Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #376369

Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because

From Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because
Date 2016-10-14 12:52 +0000
Message-ID <e6c2ogFtnreU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (25 earlier) <e69kreFc5u1U1@mid.individual.net> <nto883$irv$1@dont-email.me> <ntpi5g$ji4$6@dont-email.me> <e6c0vnFt3puU1@mid.individual.net> <ntqjtq$luo$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2016-10-14, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
> Jim Polaski babbled:
>
>> On 2016-10-14, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:12:20 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do you really think I give a rats ass if you are "disappointed"?
>>>> I don't need to be defended by scum like you
>>>
>>> So now "Jim" has morphed into a "concern" troll. Isn't that precious.
>> 
>> I haven't morphed into anything. I was attacked first, by someone named
>> Chris Ahlstrom. I am simply defending myself
>
> Oh, that old lie again.

It's a fact.
You claiming otherwise however /is/ a lie.


>> and tossing the same mud
>> back into the the attackers house. Think of me as the Donald Trump of
>> COLA. Unlike others, I don't lay down and take it. I bite back.
>
> You do nothing of that sort. All you are doing is showing your dishonesty 
> and stupidity

Nope. 
The facts support my statements.

  
>> How about a piece of factual data for you. Since you enjoy talking about
>> trolls so much, please find where I attacked anyone prior to Ahlstrom's
>> unfair attack on me.
>
> He has not "unfair attacked you"
> Quit lying, "Jim"

Yes he did.
Go look for yourself.
Oh, I know, you never do any research. Something that is quite obvious 
based upon your lack of comprehension and incorrect conclusions.

Look at it this way, it's 100 percent impossible to have a reasonable, 
adult conversation with you k00ks. You expect people to remain silent 
when you bait, attack and antagonize people and when then defend 
themselves you boldly complain "see that, the troll has revealed 
himself". 
It's a no win situation and it's at least partially responsible for the 
obvious observation which is there are about 4 people total, that's 
/four people/ who claim to be Linux advocates.

That is pitiful especially considering this is an open group and appears 
in Google Groups.
And looking at older posts in Google it has been like this for years.
You so called Linux advocates can blame yourselves for that one.
 

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Linux Fails Because Bozzo Rink <bozzo@graduate.org> - 2016-10-06 04:33 +0000
  Re: Linux Fails Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-06 09:49 +0200
    Re: Linux Fails Because Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 10:08 -0700
  Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-06 06:30 -0400
    Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-06 10:04 -0400
      Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-06 10:15 -0400
        Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-06 10:29 -0400
          Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-06 12:16 -0400
            Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-07 13:51 -0400
              Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-07 14:13 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-07 15:24 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-07 19:30 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-07 20:13 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 00:53 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 05:35 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-08 13:34 +0100
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-10-08 08:44 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 08:57 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 15:16 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 15:39 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-08 22:35 +0100
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 21:52 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 20:40 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 01:07 +0000
                Linux Trolls Succeed when you help them bypass filters Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-09 08:12 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-09 13:16 +0100
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 10:16 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 10:23 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-10-08 10:36 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 15:38 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-08 21:12 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 17:27 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 21:37 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 20:38 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-10 18:02 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 00:04 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 15:10 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 15:21 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 11:31 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 11:22 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 11:26 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 15:31 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 11:40 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 16:38 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 09:42 -0700
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-11 18:54 +0200
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 16:56 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 11:33 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-11 17:56 +0200
                Linux Trolls Fail Because They Are Satire-Impaired Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-11 19:11 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because They Are Satire-Impaired Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-10-11 19:32 -0400
                Linux Trolls Fail Because They Are MAD Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-12 06:13 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because They Are Satire-Impaired chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 07:14 -0500
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 16:04 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 12:18 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 16:55 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 13:04 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-11 19:10 +0200
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 13:19 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 17:18 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-11 19:19 +0200
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-11 12:25 -0500
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 17:28 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 18:02 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 18:00 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-11 20:57 +0200
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 15:12 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 19:49 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-11 19:18 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 13:24 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 18:42 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 15:09 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 16:29 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 14:08 -0700
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 17:38 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 14:45 -0700
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 19:01 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-22 10:05 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-25 10:03 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-28 08:28 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-28 14:56 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-29 09:02 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-20 12:01 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 18:00 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-12 06:05 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 20:28 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-12 20:32 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 12:49 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 15:01 +0200
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 13:23 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 15:51 +0200
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 14:19 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 16:32 +0200
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 14:42 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 17:12 +0200
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 10:45 -0500
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 15:51 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-17 11:34 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 15:49 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 03:07 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-14 12:22 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-14 14:43 +0200
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-14 12:52 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-13 09:40 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-13 15:07 +0100
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 16:16 +0200
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 09:30 -0500
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 03:06 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-14 06:59 -0500
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 07:31 -0700
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-22 09:17 -0700
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 08:59 -0500
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 16:05 +0200
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-14 20:18 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 03:05 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-20 20:19 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-08 17:40 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-08 22:41 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-08 18:49 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-08 23:04 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-08 19:13 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 20:39 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-08 10:42 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-08 15:47 +0100
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-08 12:13 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-08 20:49 +0200
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 15:17 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 15:21 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-08 16:43 +0100
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 15:50 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 15:10 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 19:49 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-09 10:13 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-09 10:19 -0400
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 15:22 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 15:20 +0000
                Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-07 17:19 -0400
  Re: Linux Fails Because Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 11:11 -0700

csiph-web