Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #354536 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sandman <mr@sandman.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-10 18:22 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-05-16 09:54 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 109 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-10 18:22 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-10 13:35 -0500
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 17:53 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 17:53 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-11 15:51 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-11 17:26 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 10:40 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 12:16 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-11 22:57 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 18:02 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 19:12 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-12 13:27 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-12 08:48 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 06:21 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-12 08:42 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:29 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-12 21:47 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-12 23:14 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-13 08:52 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 09:12 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 15:38 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 09:50 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 18:06 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 09:15 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 18:26 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 09:37 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-05-13 09:39 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Alan Bundis <birdwatcheralanbundis@mymail.net> - 2016-05-13 17:34 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 10:39 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 10:57 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 18:38 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 14:44 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 11:56 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 20:07 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 09:04 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-14 21:35 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 19:20 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 14:29 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 23:37 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 15:24 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 21:39 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-13 23:19 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-13 21:09 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 21:13 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 14:23 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <PeteM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 11:23 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-14 15:59 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 16:28 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 09:30 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 13:07 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <PeteM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 12:55 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 17:22 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 15:11 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 20:52 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 18:14 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-15 00:29 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 19:43 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 23:20 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 19:36 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 23:57 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 20:18 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 00:29 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 21:00 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 01:13 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 09:54 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 14:41 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 09:47 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-15 08:21 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 09:59 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Alan Bundis <birdwatcheralanbundis@mymail.net> - 2016-05-13 17:37 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-25 17:23 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 15:39 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-25 20:23 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 08:21 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-14 22:00 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 10:24 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-15 14:30 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 18:48 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-15 15:03 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-15 12:16 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 19:32 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-16 15:13 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-16 19:22 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-16 16:01 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-16 21:27 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 12:06 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 14:08 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 16:31 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 19:46 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-14 08:47 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-15 13:04 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-18 09:01 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-16 07:41 -0500
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-18 09:03 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 10:28 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 13:44 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-16 07:36 -0500
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-12 08:37 -0700
Snit digest 236 / 2016-05-12 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-12 16:06 +0000
Re: Snit digest 236 / 2016-05-12 tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:32 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-12 08:36 -0700
Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-12 16:02 +0000
Re: Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:32 -0700
Re: Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:37 -0700
Re: Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 18:28 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-18 11:29 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 18:12 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-05-16 13:57 +0100
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-16 09:54 -0700
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
| From | "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 20:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nh8f1t$83q$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355379 |
"owl" wrote in message news:hjga30af.3ar@rooftop.invalid... Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "owl" wrote in message news:ghnvjckfi93.ar3@rooftop.invalid... > > Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> "owl" wrote in message news:fhjg0af.aa34@rooftop.invalid... >> >> Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> "owl" wrote in message news:fhjd0p3raf.g@rooftop.invalid... >>> >>> Moustache Pete <PeteM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "owl" wrote in message news:fhgjf03a.fjig@rooftop.invalid... >>>> >>>> Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >>>>> In article <nh7fn6$kss$1@dont-email.me>, Moustache Pete wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Snit must have really PWND you. You should accept your defeat and >>>>>> fuck off. Your incessant rants about Snit reinforce what an asshole >>>>>> you really are. >>>>> >>>>> Hello Michael! >>>>> >>>>> And no, citizens of COLA, this isn't Michael Glasser, this is Michael >>>>> Patelmo >>>>> from Stuart Florida. He must have grown bored of being ignored in CSMA >>>>> and >>>>> wanted to troll COLA a bit. >>>>> >>>>> When using your Eternal September account, Michael, don't use it with >>>>> the >>>>> same >>>>> IP you use to post to CSMA :-D >>>>> >>>>> 09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c = >>>>> 2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06 >>>>> >>>> >>>>>Are Michael and Walter the same person? >>>> >>>> Nah. He's just obsessed and stupid. Really stupid, as you can see by >>>> his >>>> posts. >>>> >>> >>>>How so? Your IP appears in posts by "Michael" and "Walter Myer." >>> >>> Posts by "Michael", haven't seen any of those. Walter Meyer, yes I've >>> seen >>> them. Am I either? No. >>> >> >>>So you are just using their headers to appear to be them. If so, remove >>>the incriminating header and reply to this post. >> >> There is no "incriminating" header. I am using the server I was >> instructed >> to use. >> > >>Of course there is. See below. > >> You referred to "them". I know for a fact that no one called "Michael" >> has >> posted here. Maybe you can point me to one of "Michaels" posts. >> > >>Sure. See below. > >> Anything else that I can help with? >> > >>Sure. Help me understand why you say you are not "Michael" and "Walter >>Meyer." I gave you the opportunity to claim that you forged the >>incriminating >>header, and instead you claim that it does not exist. That means that you >>did not forge it, the header is real, and you are "Michael" and "Walter >>Meyer." > > Whatever makes you happy wasting your time. > > Anything else? > >Yeah. What the hell is a "Popkin"? Beats me. What? > snipped errors. > snipped non-essential.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-15 00:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gkbm97.cvx@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #355381 |
Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "owl" wrote in message news:hjga30af.3ar@rooftop.invalid... > > Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Anything else? >>> > >>Yeah. What the hell is a "Popkin"? > > > Beats me. What? > http://emerald.tufts.edu/alumni/magazine/spring2007/images/features/A4763_NS.jpg > > snipped non-essential. > Better snipped than explained, right Popkin? "Popkin" -- what kind of fuckard name is that? Mommy's little Popkin. LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 21:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nh8hg1$ed2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355386 |
"owl" wrote in message news:gkbm97.cvx@rooftop.invalid... Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "owl" wrote in message news:hjga30af.3ar@rooftop.invalid... > > Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Anything else? >>> > >>Yeah. What the hell is a "Popkin"? > > > Beats me. What? > >http://emerald.tufts.edu/alumni/magazine/spring2007/images/features/A4763_NS.jpg > > snipped non-essential. > >Better snipped than explained, right Popkin? I really don't have an explanation for a bunch of useless numbers with names attached, proving nothing and changing even less. >"Popkin" -- what kind of fuckard name is that? Had you Googled it; You might have gotten some answers. The correct one in this case escaped me. But it does seem to be a name that seems to get assholes upset. >Mommy's little Popkin. LOL! FYI: Mommy called me "dear". BTW: you can think I am whoever you want. It just doesn't matter. What you think or do, does not enrich me or harm me, in any way. Now that we have settled that; can I do anything else for you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-15 01:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ghjdv03.ae@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #355390 |
Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "owl" wrote in message news:gkbm97.cvx@rooftop.invalid... > > Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> "owl" wrote in message news:hjga30af.3ar@rooftop.invalid... >> >> Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Anything else? >>>> >> >>>Yeah. What the hell is a "Popkin"? >> >> >> Beats me. What? >> > >>http://emerald.tufts.edu/alumni/magazine/spring2007/images/features/A4763_NS.jpg > >> >> snipped non-essential. >> > >>Better snipped than explained, right Popkin? > > > I really don't have an explanation for a bunch of useless numbers with names > attached, proving nothing and changing even less. > They prove you're Popkin. > >>"Popkin" -- what kind of fuckard name is that? > > > Had you Googled it; You might have gotten some answers. The correct one in > this case escaped me. But it does seem to be a name that seems to get > assholes upset. > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=popkin <quote> popkin To be the center of attention while 4+ men slap there cocks off your face hard leaving red marks A adult movie - after you have shot your load getting swaffled on the face - argghhh lets popkin her face - yeh </quote> > >>Mommy's little Popkin. LOL! > > > FYI: Mommy called me "dear". > > > BTW: you can think I am whoever you want. It just doesn't matter. What you > think or do, does not enrich me or harm me, in any way. > > > Now that we have settled that; can I do anything else for you? > Now that I know where you got your nickname, I'll pass.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-15 09:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nh9url$f11$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355395 |
"owl" wrote in message news:ghjdv03.ae@rooftop.invalid... Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "owl" wrote in message news:gkbm97.cvx@rooftop.invalid... > > Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> "owl" wrote in message news:hjga30af.3ar@rooftop.invalid... >> >> Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Anything else? >>>> >> >>>Yeah. What the hell is a "Popkin"? >> >> >> Beats me. What? >> > >>http://emerald.tufts.edu/alumni/magazine/spring2007/images/features/A4763_NS.jpg > >> >> snipped non-essential. >> > >>Better snipped than explained, right Popkin? > > > I really don't have an explanation for a bunch of useless numbers with > names > attached, proving nothing and changing even less. > >They prove you're Popkin. uh huh, whatever makes you happy. > >>"Popkin" -- what kind of fuckard name is that? > > > Had you Googled it; You might have gotten some answers. The correct one > in > this case escaped me. But it does seem to be a name that seems to get > assholes upset. > >http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=popkin ><quote> >popkin >To be the center of attention while 4+ men slap there cocks off your >face hard leaving red marks I seem to recall that. Your mother, sister and wife were the main attractions. But the guys were real gentlemen, they only dick slapped them very easy. One of the rags liked to rub the cock heads all around her lips. One of the bitches got a load in her eye!! As for me, I wouldn't touch them with your dick. But I'm sure you never had a problem. >A adult movie - after you have shot your load getting swaffled on the >face - argghhh lets popkin her face - yeh ></quote> I remember that movie...your mother, sister and wife were the stars. It was called, if my memory is correct, " Big cocks fucking scabby cunts". And they looked pretty scabby. > >>Mommy's little Popkin. LOL! > > > FYI: Mommy called me "dear". > > > BTW: you can think I am whoever you want. It just doesn't matter. What > you > think or do, does not enrich me or harm me, in any way. > > > Now that we have settled that; can I do anything else for you? > >Now that I know where you got your nickname, I'll pass. OK, suits me, bye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-15 14:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sfhjv03af.ki@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #355464 |
Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "owl" wrote in message news:ghjdv03.ae@rooftop.invalid... > >> Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> "owl" wrote in message news:gkbm97.cvx@rooftop.invalid... >>> ... >>>> Better snipped than explained, right Popkin? >>>> >>> >>> I really don't have an explanation for a bunch of useless numbers with >>> names >>> attached, proving nothing and changing even less. >>> >> >>They prove you're Popkin. >> > > uh huh, whatever makes you happy. > > > >> It's not about making me happy, Popkin. But if you want to make me happy, you can fix your brain-dead newsreader, which appears to be "Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331" and which is having some kind of problem with the quote prefix. I tried to tidy things up. Now, back to the story... Popkin: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/vRasX2FRHiM/Jv7Hu2x_LQAJ <quote> posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; </quote> Moustache Pete: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/yCxFgtKF4w8/zsSRwp_DBQAJ <quote> posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; </quote> Does that clear it up for you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-15 09:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5fff575f-ad48-46e2-9da6-f5d83317da8d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #355475 |
On Sunday, May 15, 2016 at 8:41:45 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > "owl" wrote in message news:ghjdv03.ae@rooftop.invalid... > > > >> Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> "owl" wrote in message news:gkbm97.cvx@rooftop.invalid... > >>> > > ... > > >>>> Better snipped than explained, right Popkin? > >>>> > >>> > >>> I really don't have an explanation for a bunch of useless numbers with > >>> names > >>> attached, proving nothing and changing even less. > >>> > >> > >>They prove you're Popkin. > >> > > > > uh huh, whatever makes you happy. > > > > > > > >> > > It's not about making me happy, Popkin. But if you want to make me happy, > you can fix your brain-dead newsreader, which appears to be "Microsoft Windows > Live Mail 16.4.3528.331" and which is having some kind of problem with > the quote prefix. I tried to tidy things up. > > Now, back to the story... > > Popkin: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/vRasX2FRHiM/Jv7Hu2x_LQAJ > <quote> > posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; > </quote> > > Moustache Pete: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/yCxFgtKF4w8/zsSRwp_DBQAJ > <quote> > posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; > </quote> > > Does that clear it up for you? He stopped caring about being caught years ago.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sandman <mr@sandman.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-15 08:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sandman-d636a17e5072f8c6d00123edd5c87a2c@individual.net> |
| In reply to | #355300 |
In article <fhgjf03a.fjig@rooftop.invalid>, owl wrote: > > > Moustache Pete: > > > Snit must have really PWND you. You should accept your defeat > > > and fuck off. Your incessant rants about Snit reinforce what an > > > asshole you really are. > > > > Sandman: > > Hello Michael! > > > And no, citizens of COLA, this isn't Michael Glasser, this is > > Michael Patelmo from Stuart Florida. He must have grown bored of > > being ignored in CSMA and wanted to troll COLA a bit. > > > When using your Eternal September account, Michael, don't use it > > with the same IP you use to post to CSMA :-D > > > 09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c = > > 2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06 > > Are Michael and Walter the same person? Yes, Walter Myer is the currently most used gym of Michael Patelmo, 80 years old guy from Stuart, Florida. He mostly post to CSMA so it was strange to see him here :) -- Sandman
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-15 09:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nh9v4c$fvi$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355439 |
"Sandman" wrote in message news:sandman-d636a17e5072f8c6d00123edd5c87a2c@individual.net... In article <fhgjf03a.fjig@rooftop.invalid>, owl wrote: > > > Moustache Pete: > > > Snit must have really PWND you. You should accept your defeat > > > and fuck off. Your incessant rants about Snit reinforce what an > > > asshole you really are. > > > > Sandman: > > Hello Michael! > > > And no, citizens of COLA, this isn't Michael Glasser, this is > > Michael Patelmo from Stuart Florida. He must have grown bored of > > being ignored in CSMA and wanted to troll COLA a bit. > > > When using your Eternal September account, Michael, don't use it > > with the same IP you use to post to CSMA :-D > > > 09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c = > > 2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06 > > Are Michael and Walter the same person? >Yes, Walter Myer is the currently most used gym of Michael Patelmo, 80 >years >old guy from Stuart, Florida. He mostly post to CSMA so it was strange to >see >him here :) Yeah, he do mostly post to CSMA. :) And he in a wheelchair and too old to go to the gym. :) Where did you learn Ebonics? :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Bundis <birdwatcheralanbundis@mymail.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-13 17:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nh53bt$dc3$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355109 |
On Fri, 13 May 2016 09:39:05 -0700, Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-05-13, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > > Steve, would you email me? One other thing. There is a chance that Steve Carroll, both of them, and snit are really the same person. At one time there was a real person Steve Carroll in CSMA but at some point he stopped posting and then reappeared and shortly following that the real snit/Steve Carroll wars started up. I don't subscribe to that explanation but others do and it does seem plausible.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-25 17:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ni54su$v2f$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355107 |
On 5/13/2016 12:37 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, May 13, 2016 at 10:26:22 AM UTC-6, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> DFS should start playing with mongodb and javascript, I think >>> he'd like it. >> >> Maybe. But he is used to SQL and might have a hard time getting used to a >> document oriented DB. And his projects (as well as mine) are probably better >> served with a SQL DB. > > I agree, but he seems hell-bent on using documents. What do you mean? > Going this route would put him into browser land a bit easier, another > thing I think he'd really like; Well, I developed a few .jsp pages 15 years ago. Does that count? I will definitely be doing some web development this year. > and from there to mobile apps > via something like PhoneGap or similar. I doubt I'll ever develop mobile apps - though it would be cool to see the wife running one of my apps on her phone.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-25 15:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4c36fa41-4238-414a-9620-1b7373deaa62@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #357196 |
On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 3:23:07 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > On 5/13/2016 12:37 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Friday, May 13, 2016 at 10:26:22 AM UTC-6, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > > >>> DFS should start playing with mongodb and javascript, I think > >>> he'd like it. > >> > >> Maybe. But he is used to SQL and might have a hard time getting used to a > >> document oriented DB. And his projects (as well as mine) are probably better > >> served with a SQL DB. > > > > I agree, but he seems hell-bent on using documents. > > > What do you mean? It seemed to me that you were intent on staying away from a relational db, preferring to use a document based store instead (which is why I suggested you look at mongo). > > Going this route would put him into browser land a bit easier, another > > thing I think he'd really like; > > Well, I developed a few .jsp pages 15 years ago. Does that count? > > I will definitely be doing some web development this year. What you did counts but I think you'll like it more now, much more if you are using Python and you start using a framework. I've seen some Django and Flask tuts, good stuff. > > and from there to mobile apps > > via something like PhoneGap or similar. > > I doubt I'll ever develop mobile apps - though it would be cool to see > the wife running one of my apps on her phone. That's the thing, you don't need to write them natively... and especially so if they don't address any of the devices's hardware capabilities (i.e gyroscope). If you make your web stuff fluid and responsive, you're good to go. Your 'app' will work on computers and mobile devices of all kinds because the browser is the OS.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-25 20:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ni5fev$37q$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #357217 |
On 5/25/2016 6:39 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 3:23:07 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >> On 5/13/2016 12:37 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Friday, May 13, 2016 at 10:26:22 AM UTC-6, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> >>>>> DFS should start playing with mongodb and javascript, I think >>>>> he'd like it. >>>> >>>> Maybe. But he is used to SQL and might have a hard time getting used to a >>>> document oriented DB. And his projects (as well as mine) are probably better >>>> served with a SQL DB. >>> >>> I agree, but he seems hell-bent on using documents. >> >> >> What do you mean? > > It seemed to me that you were intent on staying away from a relational db, preferring to use a document based store instead (which is why I suggested you look at mongo). Still not following you. What gave you the idea I wanted to stay away from a relational db? >>> Going this route would put him into browser land a bit easier, another >> > thing I think he'd really like; >> >> Well, I developed a few .jsp pages 15 years ago. Does that count? >> >> I will definitely be doing some web development this year. > > What you did counts but I think you'll like it more now, much more if you are using Python and you start using a framework. I've seen some Django and Flask tuts, good stuff. Googled for 'flask tuts' and the first was: http://code.tutsplus.com/tutorials/an-introduction-to-pythons-flask-framework--net-28822 Looks interesting. (Never heard of a 'tut' before. A short or introductory tutorial?) >>> and from there to mobile apps >> > via something like PhoneGap or similar. >> >> I doubt I'll ever develop mobile apps - though it would be cool to see >> the wife running one of my apps on her phone. > > That's the thing, you don't need to write them natively... and especially so if they don't address any of the devices's hardware capabilities (i.e gyroscope). If you make your web stuff fluid and responsive, you're good to go. Your 'app' will work on computers and mobile devices of all kinds because the browser is the OS. Don't you need to do significant work to make an 'm' version? Deal with scaling and sizing, etc? I've seen a bunch of websites that look real bad on a phone.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-26 08:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <729e6915-74ef-497b-a08c-eed8cd8656d0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #357236 |
On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 6:23:24 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > On 5/25/2016 6:39 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 3:23:07 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > >> On 5/13/2016 12:37 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Friday, May 13, 2016 at 10:26:22 AM UTC-6, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> > >>>>> DFS should start playing with mongodb and javascript, I think > >>>>> he'd like it. > >>>> > >>>> Maybe. But he is used to SQL and might have a hard time getting used to a > >>>> document oriented DB. And his projects (as well as mine) are probably better > >>>> served with a SQL DB. > >>> > >>> I agree, but he seems hell-bent on using documents. > >> > >> > >> What do you mean? > > > > It seemed to me that you were intent on staying away from a relational db, preferring to use a document based store instead (which is why I suggested you look at mongo). > > > Still not following you. > > What gave you the idea I wanted to stay away from a relational db? Maybe it's the same thing that cause PK to mention "document oriented DB" ;) > >>> Going this route would put him into browser land a bit easier, another > >> > thing I think he'd really like; > >> > >> Well, I developed a few .jsp pages 15 years ago. Does that count? > >> > >> I will definitely be doing some web development this year. > > > > What you did counts but I think you'll like it more now, much more if you are using Python and you start using a framework. I've seen some Django and Flask tuts, good stuff. > > > Googled for 'flask tuts' and the first was: > > http://code.tutsplus.com/tutorials/an-introduction-to-pythons-flask-framework--net-28822 > > Looks interesting. > > > (Never heard of a 'tut' before. A short or introductory tutorial?) Yes. > >>> and from there to mobile apps > >> > via something like PhoneGap or similar. > >> > >> I doubt I'll ever develop mobile apps - though it would be cool to see > >> the wife running one of my apps on her phone. > > > > That's the thing, you don't need to write them natively... and especially so if they don't address any of the devices's hardware capabilities (i.e gyroscope). If you make your web stuff fluid and responsive, you're good to go. Your 'app' will work on computers and mobile devices of all kinds because the browser is the OS. > > Don't you need to do significant work to make an 'm' version? Deal with > scaling and sizing, etc? I've seen a bunch of websites that look real > bad on a phone. There is more work involved but it's not that difficult.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 22:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nh8l1n$l1o$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355089 |
On 5/13/2016 12:15 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, May 13, 2016 at 10:06:55 AM UTC-6, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> Yes. It does the trick, it is *short* and I don't have to write it >> myself. Why rewrite something which already exists? It is not my >> fault that your beloved VB isn't up to snuff > > You;re right, obviously... Quit lying... he failed. He used somebody else's code. > DFS should start playing with mongodb and > javascript, I think he'd like it. MongoDB seems to be doing well. Started in 2007, they have nearly 20 offices around the world. One here in Atlanta, right near where I used to work. https://www.mongodb.com/office-locations "MongoDB stores data records as BSON documents. BSON is a binary representation of JSON documents... "Specification Version 1.0 BSON is a binary format in which zero or more key/value pairs are stored as a single entity. We call this entity a document." yuck. Rows and columns ftw... How are you using MongoDB and JavaScript in real life?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-15 10:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c8021e93-704d-4a81-b6a5-516dc42c7f8f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #355403 |
On Saturday, May 14, 2016 at 8:00:48 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > On 5/13/2016 12:15 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Friday, May 13, 2016 at 10:06:55 AM UTC-6, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > > >> Yes. It does the trick, it is *short* and I don't have to write it > >> myself. Why rewrite something which already exists? It is not my > >> fault that your beloved VB isn't up to snuff > > > > You;re right, obviously... > > > Quit lying... Oh, f*ck... you're really gonna yank that outta content this way, Snit? > he failed. He used somebody else's code. Whatever you say, Acid Rainman ;) > > DFS should start playing with mongodb and > > javascript, I think he'd like it. > > > MongoDB seems to be doing well. Started in 2007, they have nearly 20 > offices around the world. One here in Atlanta, right near where I used > to work. > > https://www.mongodb.com/office-locations > > > "MongoDB stores data records as BSON documents. BSON is a binary > representation of JSON documents... > > "Specification Version 1.0 > BSON is a binary format in which zero or more key/value pairs are stored > as a single entity. We call this entity a document." > > > yuck. Maybe... but there's gold in them thar hills. > Rows and columns ftw... For some of the win, yeah... but a lot off things have changed while you were asleep, Rump(elstiltskin). > How are you using MongoDB and JavaScript in real life? Right now only in MEAN stack apps locally but it's widely used for lots of things by a lot of companies: <https://www.mongodb.com/who-uses-mongodb> (it's not the only fact file game in town)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-15 14:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nhaf19$osf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355516 |
On 5/15/2016 1:24 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Saturday, May 14, 2016 at 8:00:48 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote:
>> On 5/13/2016 12:15 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On Friday, May 13, 2016 at 10:06:55 AM UTC-6, Peter Köhlmann
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>> Yes. It does the trick, it is *short* and I don't have to write
>>>> it myself. Why rewrite something which already exists? It is
>>>> not my fault that your beloved VB isn't up to snuff
>>>
>>> You;re right, obviously...
>>
>>
>> Quit lying...
>
> Oh, f*ck... you're really gonna yank that outta content this way,
> Snit?
? All context was included.
>> he failed. He used somebody else's code.
>
> Whatever you say, Acid Rainman ;)
Did I stutter? "He failed. He used somebody else's code."
>>> DFS should start playing with mongodb and javascript, I think
>>> he'd like it.
>>
>>
>> MongoDB seems to be doing well. Started in 2007, they have nearly
>> 20 offices around the world. One here in Atlanta, right near where
>> I used to work.
>>
>> https://www.mongodb.com/office-locations
>>
>>
>> "MongoDB stores data records as BSON documents. BSON is a binary
>> representation of JSON documents...
>>
>> "Specification Version 1.0 BSON is a binary format in which zero or
>> more key/value pairs are stored as a single entity. We call this
>> entity a document."
>>
>>
>> yuck.
>
> Maybe... but there's gold in them thar hills.
gold is nice.
>> Rows and columns ftw...
>
> For some of the win, yeah... but a lot off things have changed while
> you were asleep, Rump(elstiltskin).
Sure they have... tell us again:
* "Which [Windows] users? Not to ones that are doing the majority of
their computer using mobile devices, you know the vast majority of
users."
* "The [Windows corporate and consumer] apps that are being *totally*
eclipsed by mobile app that, you know... run on Linux?"
* "Being that you can do the most common tasks, previously only done
on the desktop, on a tablet or smart phone, the average user
probably uses one of his mobile apps at a ratio of 10 to 1 with
one of his desktop apps (if it's even that close)."
* "As to the 10x number [referenced above], it's likely *way* low..."
* "The majority [of users]... people who are using WAY more apps on
mobile devices than they are running *anything* by MS."
You slunk away last time.
>> How are you using MongoDB and JavaScript in real life?
>
> Right now only in MEAN stack apps
"With MongoDB, we can store our documents in a JSON-like format, write
JSON queries on our ExpressJS and NodeJS based server, and seamlessly
pass JSON documents to our AngularJS frontend."
http://blog.mongodb.org/post/49262866911/the-mean-stack-mongodb-expressjs-angularjs-and
Is this what you're doing? Making actual money doing it?
> locally but it's widely used for
> lots of things by a lot of companies:
>
> <https://www.mongodb.com/who-uses-mongodb>
>
> (it's not the only fact file game in town)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-15 18:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ghjcu830af.jgi@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #355539 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 5/15/2016 1:24 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Saturday, May 14, 2016 at 8:00:48 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >>> On 5/13/2016 12:15 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> On Friday, May 13, 2016 at 10:06:55 AM UTC-6, Peter Köhlmann >>>> wrote: >>> >>>>> Yes. It does the trick, it is *short* and I don't have to write >>>>> it myself. Why rewrite something which already exists? It is >>>>> not my fault that your beloved VB isn't up to snuff >>>> >>>> You;re right, obviously... >>> >>> >>> Quit lying... >> >> Oh, f*ck... you're really gonna yank that outta content this way, >> Snit? > > ? All context was included. > > > >>> he failed. He used somebody else's code. >> >> Whatever you say, Acid Rainman ;) > > Did I stutter? "He failed. He used somebody else's code." > Dude, you're using nntplib in your stats thingie instead of rolling your own.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-15 15:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nhagvk$3oe$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355550 |
On 5/15/2016 2:48 PM, owl wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 5/15/2016 1:24 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Saturday, May 14, 2016 at 8:00:48 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >>>> On 5/13/2016 12:15 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> On Friday, May 13, 2016 at 10:06:55 AM UTC-6, Peter Köhlmann >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Yes. It does the trick, it is *short* and I don't have to write >>>>>> it myself. Why rewrite something which already exists? It is >>>>>> not my fault that your beloved VB isn't up to snuff >>>>> >>>>> You;re right, obviously... >>>> >>>> >>>> Quit lying... >>> >>> Oh, f*ck... you're really gonna yank that outta content this way, >>> Snit? >> >> ? All context was included. >> >> >> >>>> he failed. He used somebody else's code. >>> >>> Whatever you say, Acid Rainman ;) >> >> Did I stutter? "He failed. He used somebody else's code." >> > > Dude, you're using nntplib in your stats thingie instead of > rolling your own. SLAP! Kohlmann made fun of what I admitted was a simple gcd algorithm, and when I said 'write it yourself' the cheater came back with a call to a built-in function.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-15 12:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D35E1935.7308C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #355552 |
On 5/15/16, 12:03 PM, in article nhagvk$3oe$1@dont-email.me, "DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>> Whatever you say, Acid Rainman ;) >>> >>> Did I stutter? "He failed. He used somebody else's code." >> >> Dude, you're using nntplib in your stats thingie instead of >> rolling your own. > > SLAP! > > Kohlmann made fun of what I admitted was a simple gcd algorithm, and > when I said 'write it yourself' the cheater came back with a call to a > built-in function. One: There is no reason to suspect that Peter is an actual programmer. So keep that in mind and cut him some slack (though if he mocking you and boasting then that goes by the wayside). Two: Was there any reason to not use a built-in function? If it already exists and works well why not use it? Seems better than reinventing the wheel. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web