Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #355464
| From | "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat |
| Date | 2016-05-15 09:54 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nh9url$f11$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <hjga30af.3ar@rooftop.invalid> <nh8f1t$83q$1@dont-email.me> <gkbm97.cvx@rooftop.invalid> <nh8hg1$ed2$1@dont-email.me> <ghjdv03.ae@rooftop.invalid> |
"owl" wrote in message news:ghjdv03.ae@rooftop.invalid... Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "owl" wrote in message news:gkbm97.cvx@rooftop.invalid... > > Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> "owl" wrote in message news:hjga30af.3ar@rooftop.invalid... >> >> Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Anything else? >>>> >> >>>Yeah. What the hell is a "Popkin"? >> >> >> Beats me. What? >> > >>http://emerald.tufts.edu/alumni/magazine/spring2007/images/features/A4763_NS.jpg > >> >> snipped non-essential. >> > >>Better snipped than explained, right Popkin? > > > I really don't have an explanation for a bunch of useless numbers with > names > attached, proving nothing and changing even less. > >They prove you're Popkin. uh huh, whatever makes you happy. > >>"Popkin" -- what kind of fuckard name is that? > > > Had you Googled it; You might have gotten some answers. The correct one > in > this case escaped me. But it does seem to be a name that seems to get > assholes upset. > >http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=popkin ><quote> >popkin >To be the center of attention while 4+ men slap there cocks off your >face hard leaving red marks I seem to recall that. Your mother, sister and wife were the main attractions. But the guys were real gentlemen, they only dick slapped them very easy. One of the rags liked to rub the cock heads all around her lips. One of the bitches got a load in her eye!! As for me, I wouldn't touch them with your dick. But I'm sure you never had a problem. >A adult movie - after you have shot your load getting swaffled on the >face - argghhh lets popkin her face - yeh ></quote> I remember that movie...your mother, sister and wife were the stars. It was called, if my memory is correct, " Big cocks fucking scabby cunts". And they looked pretty scabby. > >>Mommy's little Popkin. LOL! > > > FYI: Mommy called me "dear". > > > BTW: you can think I am whoever you want. It just doesn't matter. What > you > think or do, does not enrich me or harm me, in any way. > > > Now that we have settled that; can I do anything else for you? > >Now that I know where you got your nickname, I'll pass. OK, suits me, bye.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-10 18:22 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-10 13:35 -0500
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 17:53 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 17:53 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-11 15:51 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-11 17:26 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 10:40 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 12:16 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-11 22:57 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 18:02 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 19:12 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-12 13:27 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-12 08:48 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 06:21 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-12 08:42 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:29 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-12 21:47 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-12 23:14 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-13 08:52 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 09:12 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 15:38 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 09:50 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 18:06 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 09:15 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 18:26 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 09:37 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-05-13 09:39 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Alan Bundis <birdwatcheralanbundis@mymail.net> - 2016-05-13 17:34 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 10:39 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 10:57 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 18:38 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 14:44 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 11:56 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 20:07 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 09:04 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-14 21:35 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 19:20 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 14:29 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 23:37 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 15:24 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 21:39 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-13 23:19 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-13 21:09 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 21:13 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 14:23 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <PeteM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 11:23 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-14 15:59 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 16:28 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 09:30 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 13:07 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <PeteM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 12:55 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 17:22 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 15:11 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 20:52 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 18:14 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-15 00:29 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 19:43 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 23:20 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 19:36 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 23:57 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 20:18 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 00:29 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 21:00 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 01:13 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 09:54 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 14:41 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 09:47 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-15 08:21 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 09:59 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Alan Bundis <birdwatcheralanbundis@mymail.net> - 2016-05-13 17:37 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-25 17:23 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 15:39 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-25 20:23 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 08:21 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-14 22:00 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 10:24 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-15 14:30 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 18:48 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-15 15:03 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-15 12:16 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 19:32 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-16 15:13 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-16 19:22 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-16 16:01 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-16 21:27 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 12:06 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 14:08 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 16:31 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 19:46 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-14 08:47 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-15 13:04 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-18 09:01 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-16 07:41 -0500
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-18 09:03 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 10:28 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 13:44 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-16 07:36 -0500
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-12 08:37 -0700
Snit digest 236 / 2016-05-12 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-12 16:06 +0000
Re: Snit digest 236 / 2016-05-12 tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:32 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-12 08:36 -0700
Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-12 16:02 +0000
Re: Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:32 -0700
Re: Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:37 -0700
Re: Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 18:28 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-18 11:29 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 18:12 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-05-16 13:57 +0100
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-16 09:54 -0700
csiph-web