Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #350189 > unrolled thread

[Meta] Another modest proposal

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  [Meta] Another modest proposal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 01:41 +0000
    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 21:47 -0400
      Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 18:27 -0400
    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-15 19:03 -0700
    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 02:19 +0000
      Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 02:37 +0000
        Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 02:42 +0000
          Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 02:54 +0000
            Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 03:01 +0000
              Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 23:05 -0400
                Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-15 23:06 -0400
                  Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 23:07 -0400
                    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-15 23:18 -0400
                  Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 03:15 +0000
                    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-15 23:20 -0400
                      Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 03:32 +0000
                  Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-15 23:28 -0700
                Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Silver Slimer <ahlstrom's_manhood@void.ca> - 2016-04-16 11:05 -0400
                  Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-19 21:46 +0000
                    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-19 17:05 -0700
                      Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 20:42 -0400
              Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 03:06 +0000
                Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 03:12 +0000
                  Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 03:32 +0000
                    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 03:41 +0000
                      Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-16 10:33 -0700
                    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-15 23:46 -0700
                  Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-15 23:36 -0700
            Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 23:03 -0400
              Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-15 23:06 -0400
                Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 23:08 -0400
                  Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-15 23:19 -0400
                    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 23:24 -0400
                      Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 03:43 +0000
              Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal buzzard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-15 23:10 -0400
              Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 03:16 +0000
                Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 23:23 -0400
                  Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 03:48 +0000
                    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-16 00:04 -0400
                      Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 04:15 +0000
                  Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-15 23:48 -0700
                    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal buzzard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-16 03:06 -0400
                      Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-16 00:19 -0700
                        Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal buzzard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-16 03:26 -0400
                        Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-16 09:06 -0400
                Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-18 08:14 -0500
            Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-16 09:41 +0000
        Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 22:48 -0400
    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Ron House <rhouse@smartchat.net.au> - 2016-04-16 15:35 +1000
      Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 15:26 +0000
        Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-16 11:35 -0400
    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 07:09 -0700

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#350189 — [Meta] Another modest proposal

You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big 8 
group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.

What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went full-on 
netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?

I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a course of 
action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the trolls.  Ha!

ObLinuxMetaNote: I format the Obligatory Linux(tm) man pages with a 
terminal width of 65.  If that doesn't work for some folks, I can make it 
smaller.

ObLinux:
$ man tcpdmatch
TCPDMATCH(8)        System Manager's Manual        TCPDMATCH(8)

NAME
       tcpdmatch - tcp wrapper oracle
[...]

-- 
 -v
"Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft
is doing very well. AS well as Linux." -"Slimer"

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#350194

On 16 Apr 2016 01:41:10 GMT, vallor wrote:

> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big 8 
> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
> 
> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went full-on 
> netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?

What would happen if folks went on a full court press on Yelp, Google
and other review sites pointing to problems they have experienced with
sonic.net?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350412

On 4/15/2016 9:47 PM, Omar wrote:
> On 16 Apr 2016 01:41:10 GMT, vallor wrote:
>
>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big 8
>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>
>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went full-on
>> netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>
> What would happen if folks went on a full court press on Yelp, Google
> and other review sites pointing to problems they have experienced with
> sonic.net?


Last I checked, Bloaty's company had a LOT of 1-star reviews on Yelp.

Mostly they said they couldn't understand the tech support guy 'Scott 
Doty' on the phone.  They said he always talked with his mouth full.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350199

On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 9:41:13 PM UTC-4, vallor wrote:
> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big 8 
> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
> 
> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went full-on 
> netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?

Then your Ad Hominem attacks would also be banned.


So go ahead and apply your own solution and ban yourself...because
by doing nothing, you're admitting that you're YA Linux hypocrite. 



-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350206

vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big 8 
> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
> 
> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went full-on 
> netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
> 
> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a course of 
> action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the trolls.  Ha!
> 

Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350213

On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:

> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big 8
>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>> 
>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>> 
>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a course of
>> action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the trolls.  Ha!
>> 
>> 
> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?

I don't follow, please explain yourself.

-- 
 -v
"Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft
is doing very well. AS well as Linux." -"Slimer"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350214

vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
> 
>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big 8
>>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>> 
>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>> 
>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a course of
>>> action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the trolls.  Ha!
>>> 
>>> 
>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
> 
> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
> 

Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it
was always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things
changed?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350218

On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:

> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>> 
>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big 8
>>>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>> 
>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>> 
>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a course
>>>> of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the trolls. 
>>>> Ha!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>> 
>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>> 
>> 
> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things changed?

There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of kookishness.

Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and more 
frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in regard to 
the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly 'shopped pair 
of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.

But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about opening a 
discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument 
could be had one way or the other.

But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.

Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll 
find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with 
threats.

Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his sleeve.

-- 
 -v
"Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft
is doing very well. AS well as Linux." -"Slimer"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350221

In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
> 
>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>> 
>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big 8
>>>>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a course
>>>>> of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the trolls. 
>>>>> Ha!
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>> 
>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>> 
>>> 
>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things changed?
> 
> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of kookishness.
> 
> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and more 
> frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in regard to 
> the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly 'shopped pair 
> of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
> 
> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about opening a 
> discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument 
> could be had one way or the other.
> 
> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
> 
> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll 
> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with 
> threats.
> 
> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his sleeve.
 
But seriously, in an advocacy group?  These are far more wild-west
that than any alt.* group.  Besides, without the trolls it would
be boring.  Can you imagine this group without John Gohde?  The
place was dying, and he rode in on his donkey just in time.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350224

On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:01:49 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote:

> In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>> 
>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big 8
>>>>>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a course
>>>>>> of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the trolls. 
>>>>>> Ha!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>> 
>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things changed?
>> 
>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of kookishness.
>> 
>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and more 
>> frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in regard to 
>> the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly 'shopped pair 
>> of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>> 
>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about opening a 
>> discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument 
>> could be had one way or the other.
>> 
>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>> 
>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll 
>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with 
>> threats.
>> 
>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his sleeve.
>  
> But seriously, in an advocacy group?  These are far more wild-west
> that than any alt.* group.  Besides, without the trolls it would
> be boring.  Can you imagine this group without John Gohde?  The
> place was dying, and he rode in on his donkey just in time.

Can you imagine this group with Bloaty, Ahlstrom and Poaster?

+1
+2
+3
And then Jeddiah would come along and take 5 paragraphs to explain how
a + sign is generated using keyboard scan codes.

Snooze time.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350226

On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:05:32 -0400, Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> wrote:

> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:01:49 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote:
>
>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>
>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take  
>>>>>>> big 8
>>>>>>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a  
>>>>>>> course
>>>>>>> of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the  
>>>>>>> trolls.
>>>>>>> Ha!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
>>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things changed?
>>>
>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of  
>>> kookishness.
>>>
>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and  
>>> more
>>> frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in regard  
>>> to
>>> the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly 'shopped pair
>>> of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>>
>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about  
>>> opening a
>>> discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument
>>> could be had one way or the other.
>>>
>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>>
>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>>> threats.
>>>
>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his  
>>> sleeve.
>>
>> But seriously, in an advocacy group?  These are far more wild-west
>> that than any alt.* group.  Besides, without the trolls it would
>> be boring.  Can you imagine this group without John Gohde?  The
>> place was dying, and he rode in on his donkey just in time.
>
> Can you imagine this group with Bloaty, Ahlstrom and Poaster?
>
> +1
> +2
> +3
> And then Jeddiah would come along and take 5 paragraphs to explain how
> a + sign is generated using keyboard scan codes.
>
> Snooze time.

do you like sine waves?

-- 
have you heard about the lotusLoser?
he's a loser but he still keeps on tryin'...

2nd verse: (by: bender@the.future)

have you heard about the lotusLoser
beaten by the queen of pembroke each time
have you heard about the lotusLoser
he's a luser but he still keeps on cryin'...

-

LOL

well i guess if we went to:

http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/color-summarizer/

and gave it the URL to the image THAT YOU POSTED IN POST:
<617072d3bd042b9634ebeb7c28503997@dizum.com>

<http://i.imgur.com/gchDiBs.png>

I took that on my way to eat lunch. I tried to make an index card with
backward writing so the SPANKY-SPANKY! reflection would show up with
frontward writing, but apparently I can't write backward legibly, so
you gets what you gets."

it would say "definitely not green", right???

http://i.imgur.com/1CkNIDC.png

D'OH!!!!

*SPNAKITY-SPNAKITY*

-

"People didn't cause the Great Depression, Liberal ko0kTarD. Governmental  
policy did." - Fakey in MID <7880b90ad2ecebe35ba01b4557597d80%40dizum.com>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Great_Depression
"The initial stock market crash triggered a "panic sell-off" that made the  
stock market go even lower."

so... so the "government" panicked, snickers?

funny that a bona-fide conservative horatio alger hero type would want the  
government stepping in to save the stock market.

"Current theories may be broadly classified into two main points of view  
and several heterodox points of view.

First, there are demand-driven theories, from Keynesian and institutional  
economists who argue that the depression was caused by a widespread loss  
of confidence that led to underconsumption. The demand-driven theories  
argue that the financial crisis following the 1929 crash led to a sudden  
and persistent reduction in consumption and investment spending.[1] Once  
panic and deflation set in, many people believed they could avoid further  
losses by keeping clear of the markets. Holding money therefore became  
profitable as prices dropped lower and a given amount of money bought ever  
more goods, exacerbating the drop in demand.

Second, there are the monetarists, who believe that the Great Depression  
started as an ordinary recession, but that significant policy mistakes by  
monetary authorities (especially the Federal Reserve), caused a shrinking  
of the money supply which greatly exacerbated the economic situation,  
causing a recession to descend into the Great Depression. Related to this  
explanation are those who point to debt deflation causing those who borrow  
to owe ever more in real terms."

wait?  what?  no major "third" konservative k0okTheory blaming the  
government for everything mentioned?

odd, that.  eh, lotusLoser?

-

the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160408001051/http://i.imgur.com/e3OrQSq.png

-

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://i.imgur.com/Z4p1Z55.png

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350228

On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:06:40 -0400, root@127.0.0.1 wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:05:32 -0400, Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:01:49 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote:
>>
>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take  
>>>>>>>> big 8
>>>>>>>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a  
>>>>>>>> course
>>>>>>>> of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the  
>>>>>>>> trolls.
>>>>>>>> Ha!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
>>>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things changed?
>>>>
>>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of  
>>>> kookishness.
>>>>
>>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and  
>>>> more
>>>> frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in regard  
>>>> to
>>>> the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly 'shopped pair
>>>> of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>>>
>>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about  
>>>> opening a
>>>> discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument
>>>> could be had one way or the other.
>>>>
>>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>>>
>>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>>>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>>>> threats.
>>>>
>>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his  
>>>> sleeve.
>>>
>>> But seriously, in an advocacy group?  These are far more wild-west
>>> that than any alt.* group.  Besides, without the trolls it would
>>> be boring.  Can you imagine this group without John Gohde?  The
>>> place was dying, and he rode in on his donkey just in time.
>>
>> Can you imagine this group with Bloaty, Ahlstrom and Poaster?
>>
>> +1
>> +2
>> +3
>> And then Jeddiah would come along and take 5 paragraphs to explain how
>> a + sign is generated using keyboard scan codes.
>>
>> Snooze time.
> 
> do you like sine waves?

I prefer triangle waves.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350234

On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:07:44 -0400, Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:06:40 -0400, root@127.0.0.1 wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:05:32 -0400, Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:01:49 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote:
>>>
>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take
>>>>>>>>> big 8
>>>>>>>>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a
>>>>>>>>> course
>>>>>>>>> of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the
>>>>>>>>> trolls.
>>>>>>>>> Ha!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it  
>>>>>> was
>>>>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things  
>>>>>> changed?
>>>>>
>>>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of
>>>>> kookishness.
>>>>>
>>>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and
>>>>> more
>>>>> frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in regard
>>>>> to
>>>>> the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly 'shopped  
>>>>> pair
>>>>> of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>>>>
>>>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about
>>>>> opening a
>>>>> discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument
>>>>> could be had one way or the other.
>>>>>
>>>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>>>>
>>>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>>>>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>>>>> threats.
>>>>>
>>>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his
>>>>> sleeve.
>>>>
>>>> But seriously, in an advocacy group?  These are far more wild-west
>>>> that than any alt.* group.  Besides, without the trolls it would
>>>> be boring.  Can you imagine this group without John Gohde?  The
>>>> place was dying, and he rode in on his donkey just in time.
>>>
>>> Can you imagine this group with Bloaty, Ahlstrom and Poaster?
>>>
>>> +1
>>> +2
>>> +3
>>> And then Jeddiah would come along and take 5 paragraphs to explain how
>>> a + sign is generated using keyboard scan codes.
>>>
>>> Snooze time.
>>
>> do you like sine waves?
>
> I prefer triangle waves.

i know just the guy...

-- 
have you heard about the lotusLoser?
he's a loser but he still keeps on tryin'...

2nd verse: (by: bender@the.future)

have you heard about the lotusLoser
beaten by the queen of pembroke each time
have you heard about the lotusLoser
he's a luser but he still keeps on cryin'...

-

LOL

well i guess if we went to:

http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/color-summarizer/

and gave it the URL to the image THAT YOU POSTED IN POST:
<617072d3bd042b9634ebeb7c28503997@dizum.com>

<http://i.imgur.com/gchDiBs.png>

I took that on my way to eat lunch. I tried to make an index card with
backward writing so the SPANKY-SPANKY! reflection would show up with
frontward writing, but apparently I can't write backward legibly, so
you gets what you gets."

it would say "definitely not green", right???

http://i.imgur.com/1CkNIDC.png

D'OH!!!!

*SPNAKITY-SPNAKITY*

-

"People didn't cause the Great Depression, Liberal ko0kTarD. Governmental  
policy did." - Fakey in MID <7880b90ad2ecebe35ba01b4557597d80%40dizum.com>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Great_Depression
"The initial stock market crash triggered a "panic sell-off" that made the  
stock market go even lower."

so... so the "government" panicked, snickers?

funny that a bona-fide conservative horatio alger hero type would want the  
government stepping in to save the stock market.

"Current theories may be broadly classified into two main points of view  
and several heterodox points of view.

First, there are demand-driven theories, from Keynesian and institutional  
economists who argue that the depression was caused by a widespread loss  
of confidence that led to underconsumption. The demand-driven theories  
argue that the financial crisis following the 1929 crash led to a sudden  
and persistent reduction in consumption and investment spending.[1] Once  
panic and deflation set in, many people believed they could avoid further  
losses by keeping clear of the markets. Holding money therefore became  
profitable as prices dropped lower and a given amount of money bought ever  
more goods, exacerbating the drop in demand.

Second, there are the monetarists, who believe that the Great Depression  
started as an ordinary recession, but that significant policy mistakes by  
monetary authorities (especially the Federal Reserve), caused a shrinking  
of the money supply which greatly exacerbated the economic situation,  
causing a recession to descend into the Great Depression. Related to this  
explanation are those who point to debt deflation causing those who borrow  
to owe ever more in real terms."

wait?  what?  no major "third" konservative k0okTheory blaming the  
government for everything mentioned?

odd, that.  eh, lotusLoser?

-

the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160408001051/http://i.imgur.com/e3OrQSq.png

-

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://i.imgur.com/Z4p1Z55.png

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350232

In comp.os.linux.advocacy "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:05:32 -0400, Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:01:49 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote:
>>
>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take  
>>>>>>>> big 8
>>>>>>>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a  
>>>>>>>> course
>>>>>>>> of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the  
>>>>>>>> trolls.
>>>>>>>> Ha!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
>>>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things changed?
>>>>
>>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of  
>>>> kookishness.
>>>>
>>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and  
>>>> more
>>>> frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in regard  
>>>> to
>>>> the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly 'shopped pair
>>>> of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>>>
>>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about  
>>>> opening a
>>>> discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument
>>>> could be had one way or the other.
>>>>
>>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>>>
>>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>>>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>>>> threats.
>>>>
>>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his  
>>>> sleeve.
>>>
>>> But seriously, in an advocacy group?  These are far more wild-west
>>> that than any alt.* group.  Besides, without the trolls it would
>>> be boring.  Can you imagine this group without John Gohde?  The
>>> place was dying, and he rode in on his donkey just in time.
>>
>> Can you imagine this group with Bloaty, Ahlstrom and Poaster?
>>
>> +1
>> +2
>> +3
>> And then Jeddiah would come along and take 5 paragraphs to explain how
>> a + sign is generated using keyboard scan codes.
>>
>> Snooze time.
> 
> do you like sine waves?
> 

I like them when they're closed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350236

On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:15:17 -0400, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

> In comp.os.linux.advocacy "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907  
> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907  
> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:05:32 -0400, Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:01:49 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote:
>>>
>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take
>>>>>>>>> big 8
>>>>>>>>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a
>>>>>>>>> course
>>>>>>>>> of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the
>>>>>>>>> trolls.
>>>>>>>>> Ha!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it  
>>>>>> was
>>>>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things  
>>>>>> changed?
>>>>>
>>>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of
>>>>> kookishness.
>>>>>
>>>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and
>>>>> more
>>>>> frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in regard
>>>>> to
>>>>> the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly 'shopped  
>>>>> pair
>>>>> of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>>>>
>>>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about
>>>>> opening a
>>>>> discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument
>>>>> could be had one way or the other.
>>>>>
>>>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>>>>
>>>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>>>>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>>>>> threats.
>>>>>
>>>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his
>>>>> sleeve.
>>>>
>>>> But seriously, in an advocacy group?  These are far more wild-west
>>>> that than any alt.* group.  Besides, without the trolls it would
>>>> be boring.  Can you imagine this group without John Gohde?  The
>>>> place was dying, and he rode in on his donkey just in time.
>>>
>>> Can you imagine this group with Bloaty, Ahlstrom and Poaster?
>>>
>>> +1
>>> +2
>>> +3
>>> And then Jeddiah would come along and take 5 paragraphs to explain how
>>> a + sign is generated using keyboard scan codes.
>>>
>>> Snooze time.
>>
>> do you like sine waves?
>>
>
> I like them when they're closed.
>

can you graph that in gnuplot?

-- 
have you heard about the lotusLoser?
he's a loser but he still keeps on tryin'...

2nd verse: (by: bender@the.future)

have you heard about the lotusLoser
beaten by the queen of pembroke each time
have you heard about the lotusLoser
he's a luser but he still keeps on cryin'...

-

LOL

well i guess if we went to:

http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/color-summarizer/

and gave it the URL to the image THAT YOU POSTED IN POST:
<617072d3bd042b9634ebeb7c28503997@dizum.com>

<http://i.imgur.com/gchDiBs.png>

I took that on my way to eat lunch. I tried to make an index card with
backward writing so the SPANKY-SPANKY! reflection would show up with
frontward writing, but apparently I can't write backward legibly, so
you gets what you gets."

it would say "definitely not green", right???

http://i.imgur.com/1CkNIDC.png

D'OH!!!!

*SPNAKITY-SPNAKITY*

-

"People didn't cause the Great Depression, Liberal ko0kTarD. Governmental  
policy did." - Fakey in MID <7880b90ad2ecebe35ba01b4557597d80%40dizum.com>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Great_Depression
"The initial stock market crash triggered a "panic sell-off" that made the  
stock market go even lower."

so... so the "government" panicked, snickers?

funny that a bona-fide conservative horatio alger hero type would want the  
government stepping in to save the stock market.

"Current theories may be broadly classified into two main points of view  
and several heterodox points of view.

First, there are demand-driven theories, from Keynesian and institutional  
economists who argue that the depression was caused by a widespread loss  
of confidence that led to underconsumption. The demand-driven theories  
argue that the financial crisis following the 1929 crash led to a sudden  
and persistent reduction in consumption and investment spending.[1] Once  
panic and deflation set in, many people believed they could avoid further  
losses by keeping clear of the markets. Holding money therefore became  
profitable as prices dropped lower and a given amount of money bought ever  
more goods, exacerbating the drop in demand.

Second, there are the monetarists, who believe that the Great Depression  
started as an ordinary recession, but that significant policy mistakes by  
monetary authorities (especially the Federal Reserve), caused a shrinking  
of the money supply which greatly exacerbated the economic situation,  
causing a recession to descend into the Great Depression. Related to this  
explanation are those who point to debt deflation causing those who borrow  
to owe ever more in real terms."

wait?  what?  no major "third" konservative k0okTheory blaming the  
government for everything mentioned?

odd, that.  eh, lotusLoser?

-

the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160408001051/http://i.imgur.com/e3OrQSq.png

-

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://i.imgur.com/Z4p1Z55.png

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350240

In comp.os.linux.advocacy "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:15:17 -0400, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907  
>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907  
>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:05:32 -0400, Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org>  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:01:49 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take
>>>>>>>>>> big 8
>>>>>>>>>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a
>>>>>>>>>> course
>>>>>>>>>> of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the
>>>>>>>>>> trolls.
>>>>>>>>>> Ha!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it  
>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things  
>>>>>>> changed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of
>>>>>> kookishness.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in regard
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly 'shopped  
>>>>>> pair
>>>>>> of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about
>>>>>> opening a
>>>>>> discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument
>>>>>> could be had one way or the other.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>>>>>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>>>>>> threats.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his
>>>>>> sleeve.
>>>>>
>>>>> But seriously, in an advocacy group?  These are far more wild-west
>>>>> that than any alt.* group.  Besides, without the trolls it would
>>>>> be boring.  Can you imagine this group without John Gohde?  The
>>>>> place was dying, and he rode in on his donkey just in time.
>>>>
>>>> Can you imagine this group with Bloaty, Ahlstrom and Poaster?
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>> +2
>>>> +3
>>>> And then Jeddiah would come along and take 5 paragraphs to explain how
>>>> a + sign is generated using keyboard scan codes.
>>>>
>>>> Snooze time.
>>>
>>> do you like sine waves?
>>>
>>
>> I like them when they're closed.
>>
> 
> can you graph that in gnuplot?
> 

Not me, but God might can.
http://www.answering-christianity.com/moon_s-shaped_orbit.gif
http://i.stack.imgur.com/DfAo0.jpg

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350258

In article <op.yfzr9eymtm21m2@benson.localhost>, root@127.0.0.1 says...


> 
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:05:32 -0400, Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:01:49 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote:
> >
> >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take
> >>>>>>> big 8
> >>>>>>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
> >>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a
> >>>>>>> course
> >>>>>>> of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the
> >>>>>>> trolls.
> >>>>>>> Ha!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
> >>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things changed?
> >>>
> >>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of
> >>> kookishness.
> >>>
> >>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and
> >>> more
> >>> frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in regard
> >>> to
> >>> the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly 'shopped pair
> >>> of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
> >>>
> >>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about
> >>> opening a
> >>> discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument
> >>> could be had one way or the other.
> >>>
> >>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
> >>>
> >>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
> >>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
> >>> threats.
> >>>
> >>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his
> >>> sleeve.
> >>
> >> But seriously, in an advocacy group?  These are far more wild-west
> >> that than any alt.* group.  Besides, without the trolls it would
> >> be boring.  Can you imagine this group without John Gohde?  The
> >> place was dying, and he rode in on his donkey just in time.
> >
> > Can you imagine this group with Bloaty, Ahlstrom and Poaster?
> >
> > +1
> > +2
> > +3
> > And then Jeddiah would come along and take 5 paragraphs to explain how
> > a + sign is generated using keyboard scan codes.
> >
> > Snooze time.
> 
> do you like sine waves?

What's your sine?

-- 
Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350323

On 2016-04-15 11:05 PM, Omar wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:01:49 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote:
>
>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>
>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big 8
>>>>>>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a course
>>>>>>> of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the trolls.
>>>>>>> Ha!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
>>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things changed?
>>>
>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of kookishness.
>>>
>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and more
>>> frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in regard to
>>> the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly 'shopped pair
>>> of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>>
>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about opening a
>>> discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument
>>> could be had one way or the other.
>>>
>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>>
>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>>> threats.
>>>
>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his sleeve.
>>
>> But seriously, in an advocacy group?  These are far more wild-west
>> that than any alt.* group.  Besides, without the trolls it would
>> be boring.  Can you imagine this group without John Gohde?  The
>> place was dying, and he rode in on his donkey just in time.
>
> Can you imagine this group with Bloaty, Ahlstrom and Poaster?
>
> +1
> +2
> +3
> And then Jeddiah would come along and take 5 paragraphs to explain how
> a + sign is generated using keyboard scan codes.
>
> Snooze time.

Posting on Usenet is the only thing stopping Scott Doty from eating.


-- 
Silver Slimer
The silver-tongued heel

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350883

On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 11:05:35 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote:

> On 2016-04-15 11:05 PM, Omar wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:01:49 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote:
>>
>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take
>>>>>>>> big 8 group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a
>>>>>>>> course of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll
>>>>>>>> the trolls. Ha!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it
>>>>> was always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things
>>>>> changed?
>>>>
>>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of
>>>> kookishness.
>>>>
>>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and
>>>> more frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in
>>>> regard to the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly
>>>> 'shopped pair of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>>>
>>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about
>>>> opening a discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious
>>>> argument could be had one way or the other.
>>>>
>>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>>>
>>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>>>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>>>> threats.
>>>>
>>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his
>>>> sleeve.
>>>
>>> But seriously, in an advocacy group?  These are far more wild-west
>>> that than any alt.* group.  Besides, without the trolls it would be
>>> boring.  Can you imagine this group without John Gohde?  The place was
>>> dying, and he rode in on his donkey just in time.
>>
>> Can you imagine this group with Bloaty, Ahlstrom and Poaster?
>>
>> +1
>> +2
>> +3
>> And then Jeddiah would come along and take 5 paragraphs to explain how
>> a + sign is generated using keyboard scan codes.
>>
>> Snooze time.
> 
> Posting on Usenet is the only thing stopping Scott Doty from eating.

Just a FYI: you're now up for April's Kook of the Month Award. But you're 
up against another multi-screed-a-day kook who has, among other things, a 
climate change denial fetish. It's a tossup which one of you will win.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350907

In article <nf68ur$eb1$28@dont-email.me>, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> 
wrote:

That we eat Microsoft programmers to reduce the glut of broken software?

-- 
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
If you assume the final scene is a dying delusion as Tom Cruise drowns below
the Louvre, then Edge of Tomorrow has a happy ending. Kill Tom repeat..

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web