Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #466183 > unrolled thread

OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter.

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-07 08:37 -0500
    Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 07:34 -0700
      Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-07 10:41 -0500
        Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 08:52 -0700
          Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-07 11:14 -0500
            Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 09:53 -0700
            Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-10 08:46 -0500
              Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 07:11 -0700
              Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-10 07:31 -0700
              Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 10:02 -0700
                Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-17 11:47 -0700
        Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-09-07 09:17 -0700
          Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-07 11:38 -0500
          Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 09:54 -0700
        Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-07 09:29 -0700
        Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 11:09 -0700
    Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-07 10:52 -0400
    #MeToo Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-07 12:17 -0700
      Re: #MeToo SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-07 20:51 +0000
        Re: #MeToo benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 17:29 -0400
          Re: #MeToo % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 14:32 -0600
            Re: #MeToo benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 17:47 -0400
              Re: #MeToo % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 14:55 -0600
        Re: #MeToo Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 20:10 -0700
      Re: #MeToo "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-09 13:56 -0400
    Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-07 20:48 +0000
      Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 14:59 -0700
        Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-07 23:30 +0000
          Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 08:19 -0700
            Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-08 15:41 +0000
              Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 09:00 -0700
                Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-08 10:12 -0700
                Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-08 18:23 +0000
                  Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-08 11:47 -0700
                    Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 12:12 -0700
                      Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 20:15 -0700
                  Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 11:48 -0700
                    Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-08 20:00 +0000
                      Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 13:29 -0700
                      Re: OT:  Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 21:33 -0700
              Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-08 10:10 -0700
          Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-08 09:30 -0700
          Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-09 13:32 -0400
            Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-09 17:56 +0000
              Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-09 11:08 -0700
                Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 11:36 -0700
              Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 11:21 -0700
                Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 16:18 -0700
              Pretty young girls shouting "can I suck your dick" ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-09 15:24 -0700
                Re: Pretty young girls shouting "can I suck your dick" ?! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-09 16:01 -0700
                  Pretty young girls shouting "can I suck your dick" ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-09 16:18 -0700
                    Re: Pretty young girls shouting "can I suck your dick" ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 16:34 -0700
                Re: Pretty young girls shouting "can I suck your dick" ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 16:02 -0700
                Re: Pretty young girls shouting "can I suck your dick" ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-09 23:51 +0000
                  Re: Pretty young girls shouting "can I suck your dick" ?! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 18:39 -0700
              Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-10 07:17 -0500
                Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 05:37 -0700
      Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-07 18:45 -0700

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#466183 — OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter.

This guy was an *asshole* of Hadronian proportions.

https://nypost.com/2018/09/06/steve-jobs-exposed-as-an-abusive-creep-by-his-daughter/

I recall the fanbois in here, using "logic" worthy of a "-hh" or a
"Steve Carroll", claiming that the millions of mourners "proved" how
great a man, Jobs was.  *So* much "better" than some obscure FOSS guy,
you know.

-- 
"Cancer is a real disease. The GPL is a legal delusion in Richard
Stallman's marxist mind."  -  RJack

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#466185

On Friday, September 7, 2018 at 7:37:22 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote:
> This guy was an *asshole* of Hadronian proportions.
> 
> https://nypost.com/2018/09/06/steve-jobs-exposed-as-an-abusive-creep-by-his-daughter/
> 
> I recall the fanbois in here, using "logic" worthy of a "-hh" or a
> "Steve Carroll", claiming that the millions of mourners "proved" how
> great a man, Jobs was. 

Providing you're even referencing something that I actually wrote 
(as opposed to a forgery) are you sure you haven't taken anything 
out of context? There are ways Jobs could be looked at as "great", 
depending upon who is looking at what they're looking at, but being 
a father was not one of them, as anyone who lived in Silicon Valley 
(as I did during his initial rise in the 70s) is well aware. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466190

Steve Carroll wrote:

> chrisv wrote:
>>
>> I recall the fanbois in here, using "logic" worthy of a "-hh" or a
>> "Steve Carroll", claiming that the millions of mourners "proved" how
>> great a man, Jobs was. 
>
>Providing you're even referencing something that I actually wrote 
>(as opposed to a forgery) are you sure you haven't taken anything 
>out of context? 

I didn't say that you or -highhorse made the above specific claim,
"Steve" (and if I see any hint of snittish arguing, on this point,
I'll simply snip, unread).

>There are ways Jobs could be looked at as "great", 
>depending upon who is looking at what they're looking at, but being 
>a father was not one of them, as anyone who lived in Silicon Valley 
>(as I did during his initial rise in the 70s) is well aware. 

This is beyond being a "bad father", though.  Job was a bad person.

But being a rotten bastard is a big advantage, in the business world.

-- 
'Seeing how (chrisv) automatically judges anyone who's successful as a
"liar, cheater, immoral, crook, filth, scum, dirty, etc"'  -  trolling
fsckwit "Ezekiel", lying shamelessly 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466192

On Friday, September 7, 2018 at 9:41:26 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
> > chrisv wrote:
> >>
> >> I recall the fanbois in here, using "logic" worthy of a "-hh" or a
> >> "Steve Carroll", claiming that the millions of mourners "proved" how
> >> great a man, Jobs was. 
> >
> >Providing you're even referencing something that I actually wrote 
> >(as opposed to a forgery) are you sure you haven't taken anything 
> >out of context? 
> 
> I didn't say that you or -highhorse made the above specific claim,
> "Steve" (and if I see any hint of snittish arguing, on this point,
> I'll simply snip, unread).

LOL! Why would I, or anyone, for that matter, care what you snip, claim to 
snip, plonk, etc.? Pull it together a bit, "chrisv" ;)

> >There are ways Jobs could be looked at as "great", 
> >depending upon who is looking at what they're looking at, but being 
> >a father was not one of them, as anyone who lived in Silicon Valley 
> >(as I did during his initial rise in the 70s) is well aware. 
> 
> This is beyond being a "bad father", though.  Job was a bad person.

Falsely claiming I'm among Jobs' fanbois doesn't make you a good one.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466194

Steve Carroll wrote:

>LOL! Why would I, or anyone, for that matter, care what you snip, claim to 
>snip, plonk, etc.?

Because snits hate to be ignored, "Steve".

>Falsely claiming I'm among Jobs' fanbois doesn't make you a good one.

LOL!  You just *had* to lie, like the snit you are.

Jeezez.  Does anyone wonder why I'm on my guard for a snittish attack,
any time that "Steve" joins the discussion?  He's just looking for an
opportunity to misunderstand and argue.

You need not respond, "Steve".  I will simply delete it, unread.

-- 
"And this is what Stallman's real problem with Jobs and Apple are.  He
loathes that they have success in ways he cannot even imagine."  -
some thing

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466201

On Friday, September 7, 2018 at 10:14:43 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
> >LOL! Why would I, or anyone, for that matter, care what you snip, claim to 
> >snip, plonk, etc.?
> 
> Because snits hate to be ignored, "Steve".
> 
> >Falsely claiming I'm among Jobs' fanbois doesn't make you a good one.
> 
> LOL!  You just *had* to lie, like the snit you are.

Lie? I didn't unequivocally state that you actually *did* anything. LOL!

I'm just 'suggesting' (like you did) that making a false claim isn't the 
mark of a good person, so you might not want to go down that road ;)

> Jeezez.  Does anyone wonder why I'm on my guard for a snittish attack,
> any time that "Steve" joins the discussion?  He's just looking for an
> opportunity to misunderstand and argue.

I understood that you were flapping your jaw with BS.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466631

chrisv wrote:

> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>
>> chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>> I didn't say that you or -highhorse made the above specific claim,
>>> "Steve"
>>
>> Falsely claiming I'm among Jobs' fanbois doesn't make you a good one.

What's amazing is when one considers this:  If I wanted to press the
"attack" that "Steve" is a "Jobs fanboi", I would do it.  Instead, I
explicitly state that that was *not* what I am saying.

"Steve" comes back with "you are claiming that".

Err, no, I'm not.  I am making no such claim.  I have no evidence to
support such a claim.  Can I make it any more clear?

Sheesh.  The lying assholery of a snit, like "Steve", is just off the
charts!

>LOL!  You just *had* to lie, like the snit you are.
>
>Jeezez.  Does anyone wonder why I'm on my guard for a snittish attack,
>any time that "Steve" joins the discussion?  He's just looking for an
>opportunity to misunderstand and argue.

-- 
'If you do not use (or claim to use) Linux exclusively you are deemed
a "troll" by the herd.'  -  some thing, lying shamelessly (but no one
can quote it lying)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466636

On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 6:46:23 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> chrisv wrote:
> 
> > Steve Carroll wrote:
> >>
> >> chrisv wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I didn't say that you or -highhorse made the above specific claim,
> >>> "Steve"
> >>
> >> Falsely claiming I'm among Jobs' fanbois doesn't make you a good one.
> 
> What's amazing is when one considers this:  If I wanted to press the
> "attack" that "Steve" is a "Jobs fanboi", I would do it.  Instead, I
> explicitly state that that was *not* what I am saying.
> 
> "Steve" comes back with "you are claiming that".
> 
> Err, no, I'm not.  I am making no such claim.  I have no evidence to
> support such a claim.  Can I make it any more clear?
> 
> Sheesh.  The lying assholery of a snit, like "Steve", is just off the
> charts!
> 
> >LOL!  You just *had* to lie, like the snit you are.
> >
> >Jeezez.  Does anyone wonder why I'm on my guard for a snittish attack,
> >any time that "Steve" joins the discussion?  He's just looking for an
> >opportunity to misunderstand and argue.
> 
> -- 
> 'If you do not use (or claim to use) Linux exclusively you are deemed
> a "troll" by the herd.'  -  some thing, lying shamelessly (but no one
> can quote it lying)



Proof Sandman accuses everyone of being Snit http://sandman.net/files/snit_circus.png. Sandman blames Larry Washington for what others do. Here is a list of names Jonas Eklundh has admitted he attributes to Larry Washington "Cactus Pete", "Donald", "Donald Miller", "Horace McSwain", "Hymen", "meat", "Mike Weaver", "Modena IV Drid", "Omar Murad Asfour", "Rhino Plastee", "Soapy", "SopwithCamel", "Sunny Day", "Takuya Saitoh", "The Letter Q", "tmelmosfire", "zevon". Larry Washington showed himself to be a sophist by having the pretense to not speak to Klaus Schadenfreude via vehemently screaming *plonk* and then berating him repeatedly using a 3rd party. 



--
This broke the Internet!
http://www.5z8.info/nic_cage_naked_y8b5qk_torrentEverything
https://youtu.be/GPPqvw8iEBs
http://prescottcomputerguy.com
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466638 — Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter.

On 9/10/18 6:46 AM, chrisv wrote:
> chrisv wrote:
> 
>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>
>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I didn't say that you or -highhorse made the above specific claim,
>>>> "Steve"
>>>
>>> Falsely claiming I'm among Jobs' fanbois doesn't make you a good one.
> 
> What's amazing is when one considers this:  If I wanted to press the
> "attack" that "Steve" is a "Jobs fanboi", I would do it.  Instead, I
> explicitly state that that was *not* what I am saying.
> 
> "Steve" comes back with "you are claiming that".
> 
> Err, no, I'm not.  I am making no such claim.  I have no evidence to
> support such a claim.  Can I make it any more clear?
> 
> Sheesh.  The lying assholery of a snit, like "Steve", is just off the
> charts!
> 
>> LOL!  You just *had* to lie, like the snit you are.
>>
>> Jeezez.  Does anyone wonder why I'm on my guard for a snittish attack,
>> any time that "Steve" joins the discussion?  He's just looking for an
>> opportunity to misunderstand and argue.
> 

What you said:
-----
I recall the fanbois in here, using "logic" worthy of a "-hh" or a
"Steve Carroll", claiming that the millions of mourners "proved" how
great a man, Jobs was.  *So* much "better" than some obscure FOSS guy,
you know.
-----

You damned well implied that Carroll, -hh, and I were "fanbois" and that 
our logic was faulty -- you even presented an example claim which would 
be absurd. When pressed on it, though, you have no evidence. You were 
merely trolling us.

Fair enough.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#467563

On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 7:46:23 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote:
> chrisv wrote:
> 
> > Steve Carroll wrote:
> >>
> >> chrisv wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I didn't say that you or -highhorse made the above specific claim,
> >>> "Steve"
> >>
> >> Falsely claiming I'm among Jobs' fanbois doesn't make you a good one.
> 
> What's amazing is when one considers this:  If I wanted to press the
> "attack" that "Steve" is a "Jobs fanboi", I would do it.  Instead, I
> explicitly state that that was *not* what I am saying.
> 
> "Steve" comes back with "you are claiming that".

Cite it.

This is rich, you're calling me a liar *as* you pretend to have quoted something
I wrote... that I didn't write.  Good job, Snit Jr. ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#467594 — Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter.

On 9/17/18 10:02 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 7:46:23 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote:
>> chrisv wrote:
>>
>>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>
>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't say that you or -highhorse made the above specific claim,
>>>>> "Steve"
>>>>
>>>> Falsely claiming I'm among Jobs' fanbois doesn't make you a good one.
>>
>> What's amazing is when one considers this:  If I wanted to press the
>> "attack" that "Steve" is a "Jobs fanboi", I would do it.  Instead, I
>> explicitly state that that was *not* what I am saying.
>>
>> "Steve" comes back with "you are claiming that".
> 
> Cite it.
> 
> This is rich, you're calling me a liar *as* you pretend to have quoted something
> I wrote... that I didn't write.  Good job, Snit Jr. ;)
> 

You just falsely attributed your own actions to me.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466197

On Friday, September 7, 2018 at 11:41:26 AM UTC-4, chrisv wrote:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
> > chrisv wrote:
> >>
> >> I recall the fanbois in here, using "logic" worthy of a "-hh" or a
> >> "Steve Carroll", claiming that the millions of mourners "proved" how
> >> great a man, Jobs was. 
> >
> >Providing you're even referencing something that I actually wrote 
> >(as opposed to a forgery) are you sure you haven't taken anything 
> >out of context? 
> 
> I didn't say that you or -highhorse made the above specific claim,
> "Steve" (and if I see any hint of snittish arguing, on this point,
> I'll simply snip, unread).

So then chrisv is merely admitting to an Ad Hominem innuendo.  
Motivationally, that'd be because of chronic pwnage butthurt.


> >There are ways Jobs could be looked at as "great", depending
> >upon who is looking at what they're looking at, but being a
> >father was not one of them, as anyone who lived in Silicon Valley 
> >(as I did during his initial rise in the 70s) is well aware. 
> 
> This is beyond being a "bad father", though.  Job was a bad person.
> 
> But being a rotten bastard is a big advantage, in the business world.

-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466200

-hh wrote:

> chrisv wrote:
>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>> > chrisv wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I recall the fanbois in here, using "logic" worthy of a "-hh" or a
>> >> "Steve Carroll", claiming that the millions of mourners "proved" how
>> >> great a man, Jobs was. 
>> >
>> >Providing you're even referencing something that I actually wrote 
>> >(as opposed to a forgery) are you sure you haven't taken anything 
>> >out of context? 
>> 
>> I didn't say that you or -highhorse made the above specific claim,
>> "Steve" (and if I see any hint of snittish arguing, on this point,
>> I'll simply snip, unread).
>
>So then chrisv is merely admitting to an Ad Hominem innuendo.  

Exactly!  Explain that to "Steve".

>Motivationally, that'd be because of chronic pwnage butthurt.

Keep telling yourself that, -highhorse.

There is no reason for me to read any -highhorse response, to this.
Others may, for laughs.

-- 
"Well, the plethora of posts & posters that have latched onto this
thread since I first made comment is certain proof of motivation! And
the simplest explanation (IAW Occam's Razor) is jealousy."  -  lying
asshole "-hh", lying shamelessly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466202

On Friday, September 7, 2018 at 10:17:40 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote:
> On Friday, September 7, 2018 at 11:41:26 AM UTC-4, chrisv wrote:
> > Steve Carroll wrote:
> > > chrisv wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I recall the fanbois in here, using "logic" worthy of a "-hh" or a
> > >> "Steve Carroll", claiming that the millions of mourners "proved" how
> > >> great a man, Jobs was. 
> > >
> > >Providing you're even referencing something that I actually wrote 
> > >(as opposed to a forgery) are you sure you haven't taken anything 
> > >out of context? 
> > 
> > I didn't say that you or -highhorse made the above specific claim,
> > "Steve" (and if I see any hint of snittish arguing, on this point,
> > I'll simply snip, unread).
> 
> So then chrisv is merely admitting to an Ad Hominem innuendo.  
> Motivationally, that'd be because of chronic pwnage butthurt.

CPB... has a nice ring to it and I can't think of a better poster boy than "chrisv" ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466198 — Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter.

On 9/7/18 8:41 AM, chrisv wrote:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
>> chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>> I recall the fanbois in here, using "logic" worthy of a "-hh" or a
>>> "Steve Carroll", claiming that the millions of mourners "proved" how
>>> great a man, Jobs was.
>>
>> Providing you're even referencing something that I actually wrote
>> (as opposed to a forgery) are you sure you haven't taken anything
>> out of context?
> 
> I didn't say that you or -highhorse made the above specific claim,
> "Steve" (and if I see any hint of snittish arguing, on this point,
> I'll simply snip, unread).

He was doing to you what you do to me, speaking for you, saying what he 
THINKS you would say and then blaming YOU for it.

>> There are ways Jobs could be looked at as "great",
>> depending upon who is looking at what they're looking at, but being
>> a father was not one of them, as anyone who lived in Silicon Valley
>> (as I did during his initial rise in the 70s) is well aware.
> 
> This is beyond being a "bad father", though.  Job was a bad person.
> 
> But being a rotten bastard is a big advantage, in the business world.

I cannot say if his ignored daughter is being fully truthful, but he was 
a shitty father and very immoral in how he treated Woz, at least at 
times (and others, of course). Does not mean his contributions to tech 
are less, but he is hardly a role model over all.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466311

On Friday, September 7, 2018 at 8:41:26 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
> > chrisv wrote:
> >>
> >> I recall the fanbois in here, using "logic" worthy of a "-hh" or a
> >> "Steve Carroll", claiming that the millions of mourners "proved" how
> >> great a man, Jobs was. 
> >
> >Providing you're even referencing something that I actually wrote 
> >(as opposed to a forgery) are you sure you haven't taken anything 
> >out of context? 
> 
> I didn't say that you or -highhorse made the above specific claim,
> "Steve" (and if I see any hint of snittish arguing, on this point,
> I'll simply snip, unread).
> 
> >There are ways Jobs could be looked at as "great", 
> >depending upon who is looking at what they're looking at, but being 
> >a father was not one of them, as anyone who lived in Silicon Valley 
> >(as I did during his initial rise in the 70s) is well aware. 
> 
> This is beyond being a "bad father", though.  Job was a bad person.
> 
> But being a rotten bastard is a big advantage, in the business world.
> 
> -- 
> 'Seeing how (chrisv) automatically judges anyone who's successful as a
> "liar, cheater, immoral, crook, filth, scum, dirty, etc"'  -  trolling
> fsckwit "Ezekiel", lying shamelessly



Steve Carroll doesn't know if there is a encumbered open source program to handle such tasks. 

And you do realize that it isn't impossible for Steve Carroll to be doing this, or getting help from someone with a clue? The "advocates" value the lowest common denominator above choice and productivity. 

You installed and read multiple reviews and your "intuitions" lead you to that opinion, so what? In fact Steve Carroll's lies only grew. So needless to say I regret not lashing out at Steve Carroll. While I am sure his wife appreciated it, I've not helped the situation at all. 

- 
This broke the Internet!!
http://comp.os.linux.advocacy.narkive.com/711dskzA/steven-petruzzellis-admits-he-can-not-back-his-claims-about-snit
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466186 — Re: OT: Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his daughter.

On 9/7/2018 9:37 AM, shit("moron superior")v wrote:


> This guy was an *asshole* of Hadronian proportions.


Your ex-wife and daughter will expose you as an abusive creep one day - 
bank on that, turd.



$python phrasecounter.py shitv "drop dead"

"<drop dead>", <201209301759.q8UHxbR25019@anonymous.usenet>

"<drop dead>", <201212151623.qBFGNUR16683@anonymous.usenet>

"As for his "nerves", he should drop dead and those will cease to be a", 
<3es043ho4b2pnfrn2aiv4lqsrv4tschsvl@4ax.com>

"For Quack, Rat, Fuddie, DumFSck, Flatshit, and Worthless:  Drop dead.", 
<93r4n3l8bkahgk7isr6r08qhr3fn8939us@4ax.com>

"He could drop dead.", <56ug9ctd1o6af813ah17t6do4urtni32b2@4ax.com>

"I'd prefer they just drop dead.", 
<3ic05498t8r2irvi2plp8urgbief99p5ah@4ax.com>

"I'd say that he should feel free to drop dead.", 
<a2nv151tm84r9f3udm3jm90fmuetinskst@4ax.com>

"If you and your shitty, lying, attack-dog pals were to drop dead, you", 
<af4la8pbvl4ml12125fvijd0c3n2cbko0f@4ax.com>

"Just drop dead, you POS.", <88nr04d31pg3k9upj41acg4v0mdj8lkpij@4ax.com>

"Maybe he'll do us all a favor and drop dead before he does.", 
<vrih5a51mi5bainfp9gvj443uj8bi0dtkm@4ax.com>

"One that would be better-off if you were to drop dead, Larry.", 
<2bc7f612vcmupj60f43fn36h8ou3pa0vib@4ax.com>

"So would you be, if you would just drop dead.", 
<7cntod57h01aa6jamf8tcmtcllj2b292qd@4ax.com>

"Someday, Shit will drop dead, and the "nay-sayers" in COLA will", 
<r1hcc51madoult8piclsj6q2e10si62l20@4ax.com>

"You suck.  Drop dead.", <6trb111ba4p7hqeh8pj80am3atd596esa9@4ax.com>

"all drop dead, for all I care.", 
<hur604htpt7unromb3q0r6ss20l0r0c1ts@4ax.com>

"drop dead, the world would be better off.  He's still here, by the", 
<tajprv01scfss981cmhnbcnnvcate6q03l@4ax.com>

"if they would both drop dead.", 
<0h87k7drqs04sbkqnoeud5vpcjk5vd3n43@4ax.com>

"like to see you drop dead.", <bre6i69ehgflpg6k5vtq4kmo9vothrbioj@4ax.com>

"would only stop trolling (or, better yet, drop dead).", 
<k1ccecdkarnd6go8sgi2l2g26vrofvdeag@4ax.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466210 — #MeToo

> Steve Jobs exposed as an abusive creep, by his #MeToo daughter.
> nypost.com/2018/09/06/steve-jobs-exposed-as-an-abusive-creep-by-his-daughter/

Quoting from the link:

  [ September 5th 2018, Lisa Jobs ] told the "Today" show 
  that she doesn’t hate her father -- she wishes only that 
  she had had more time with him.  

If I were Steve, I would've disowned her.

You can't, or shouldn't, condemn men for getting boners.
Most men lust after girly girls, not the Hillary Clinton types.

I don't have sex, and I don't care for girly girls,
but I _ sure _ as _ hell don't like the Hillary Clinton types.
#MeToo

With any luck, women will become so nasty, the population will drop.

You need a license to drive a motorcycle,
yet _ anyone can "conceive" nascent junkies;
and vasectomies are taboo, even in the porn industry.

The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected
in its birth rate -- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau, 
at the top, to Niger (6.49/woman) and Angola at the bottom.
  Jeff-Relf.Me/Global.Fertility.Rates.1970.2014.PNG

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466227 — Re: #MeToo

On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 12:17:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

> I don't have sex,

I'm truly astounded.

-- 
SilverSlimer
FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate
Absolute centrist, proud Catholic

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#466228 — Re: #MeToo

On 9/7/2018 4:51 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 12:17:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> 
>> I don't have sex,
> 
> I'm truly astounded.
> 
Why? Just read Rolf's posts and it all quickly falls into place.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web