Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #460637 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Helinka Svoboda <helinkasvoboda@protestant.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-31 22:51 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-08-01 22:06 +0000 |
| Articles | 19 on this page of 59 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
I don't agree with snit however... Helinka Svoboda <helinkasvoboda@protestant.com> - 2018-07-31 22:51 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 04:05 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-31 21:14 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-01 15:02 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 08:57 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-01 16:04 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 10:56 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 11:13 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Helinka Svoboda <helinkasvoboda@protestant.com> - 2018-08-01 23:20 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-01 23:33 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 18:00 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 17:59 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-08-01 21:34 -0400
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-02 01:48 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 19:45 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Helinka Svoboda <helinkasvoboda@protestant.com> - 2018-08-02 02:53 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 19:54 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-08-01 23:16 -0400
Re: I don't agree with snit however... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-02 06:47 -0500
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 13:40 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-02 11:54 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 13:40 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 08:13 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-02 15:29 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 09:44 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 10:49 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 09:46 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 10:39 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 11:27 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 12:26 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 12:40 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 12:44 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 13:03 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 13:13 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 13:26 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 13:50 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 14:12 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 14:26 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 17:45 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 08:30 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-03 14:42 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 16:06 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-03 16:16 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 16:47 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-08-03 20:04 -0400
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 17:09 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-04 17:56 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 11:42 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-03 17:09 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-03 12:32 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-03 14:27 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Helinka Svoboda <helinkasvoboda@protestant.com> - 2018-08-03 23:38 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-03 17:08 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-02 11:47 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... anonymouse <anonymousey666@swamper.org> - 2018-08-01 15:15 -0400
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 12:20 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 12:38 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 12:41 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-01 22:06 +0000
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 14:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsk0hjFp1l9U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #460975 |
On 8/3/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 6:45:14 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 8/2/18 2:26 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 3:12:13 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> >>>>>> Right... that is a good point. >>>>> >>>>> But it's not so "good" that it would, in your mind, actually have any >>>>> "impact" on a respondent >>>> >>>> A claim you made up about my views. >>> >>> If it was all that "good" a point, why wouldn't you be able to speak >>> more solidly about its "impact"? >> >> The claim you made up and attributed to was not good... and I have no >> desire to speak in detail about your lies about me. > > Pivoting... again? Why is it so important to you that I speak in detail about the claims you falsely attribute to me? >>> It's not like you're not aware people >>> *do* lie on surveys, even you've brought that into past arguments. >> >> Gee, and here you go into la-la land bringing up topics as if they have >> EVER been under contention. > > Said the guy who's questioning the "impact" of the "good point". Sigh. You really need to have someone help you understand what you read. You made a good point about a POSSIBLE confounding factor. What you did NOT do was show that this POSSIBLE confounding factor had any effect. More than that, when asked to you posted things that impact polling studies in GENERAL and could not say how any of these things were at all tied to your POSSIBLE confounding factor. >>> I'm now wondering what "good" means in your mind if it can't be >>> used to back an idea that you've already expressed when it suited >>> you. >>> >>>> So, do you have any such evidence? If not then it is an unknown, but >>>> certainly something to consider. >>> >>> Why do you believe this is an unknown for Muslims, especially on this >>> particular topic? >> >> Gee, you noted how there might be specific considerations for Muslims >> based on the bigotry they face, I agreed this was a good point, and now >> you want me to explain it to you. > > Nope. So stop asking me to! > What I want explained is your questioning of the impact as this > scenario is based solely on the respondents being Muslims. You want to know why I am questioning the level of impact, if any, of a POSSIBLE confounding factor you did not show had any ACTUAL impact, and for which YOU changed the topic from as you quoted irrelevant issues with polls. Sigh. I really do make it too easy for you to get the attention you beg for... you are not even trying to make sense... just spewing bot-generated insults and accusations and the like. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 16:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ee2034bf-ee1c-4a6f-923c-ef6a81abf94d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #461015 |
On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 3:42:14 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 8/3/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 6:45:14 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 8/2/18 2:26 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 3:12:13 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> > >>>>>> Right... that is a good point. > >>>>> > >>>>> But it's not so "good" that it would, in your mind, actually have any > >>>>> "impact" on a respondent > >>>> > >>>> A claim you made up about my views. > >>> > >>> If it was all that "good" a point, why wouldn't you be able to speak > >>> more solidly about its "impact"? > >> > >> The claim you made up and attributed to was not good... and I have no > >> desire to speak in detail about your lies about me. > > > > Pivoting... again? > > Why We all know why you pivot. > >>> It's not like you're not aware people > >>> *do* lie on surveys, even you've brought that into past arguments. > >> > >> Gee, and here you go into la-la land bringing up topics as if they have > >> EVER been under contention. > > > > Said the guy who's questioning the "impact" of the "good point". > > Sigh. You really need to have someone help you understand what you read. Nah, I got that you're now trying to sell the idea that people won't lie on surveys to any significant extent. But who isn't aware that you'll argue one thing one day and the complete opposite the next when it suits you? Who *hasn't* seen it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 16:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsk62vFq6efU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #461033 |
On 8/3/18 4:06 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: ... >> Sigh. You really need to have someone help you understand what you read. You made a good point about a POSSIBLE confounding factor. What you did NOT do was show that this POSSIBLE confounding factor had any effect. More than that, when asked to you posted things that impact polling studies in GENERAL and could not say how any of these things were at all tied to your POSSIBLE confounding factor. > > Nah, I got that you're now trying to sell the idea that people won't lie on surveys > to any significant extent. In other words, you "get" something that is not true. You are failing to understand what you read. You did the same thing with -hh, and again with him as he patiently tried to explain what you were not getting. As a "thanks" for his patience you lashed out with your bot-like insults and attacks. > But who isn't aware that you'll argue one thing one > day and the complete opposite the next when it suits you? Who *hasn't* seen it? You AGAIN insist I *must* mean what you falsely attribute to me. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 16:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8eaf4d06-de1f-4023-b444-508c2d2354ad@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #461035 |
On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 5:16:49 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 8/3/18 4:06 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > ... > >> Sigh. You really need to have someone help you understand what you read. You made a good point about a POSSIBLE confounding factor. What you did NOT do was show that this POSSIBLE confounding factor had any effect. More than that, when asked to you posted things that impact polling studies in GENERAL and could not say how any of these things were at all tied to your POSSIBLE confounding factor. > > > > Nah, I got that you're now trying to sell the idea that people won't lie on surveys > > to any significant extent. > > In other words, you "get" something that is not true. No, it's true you're a hypocrite, you prove it virtually every day.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 20:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <fsk8shFqnlaU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #461045 |
On Fri, 3 Aug 2018 16:47:18 -0700 (PDT), Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 5:16:49 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 8/3/18 4:06 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> ... >>>> Sigh. You really need to have someone help you understand what you read. You made a good point about a POSSIBLE confounding factor. What you did NOT do was show that this POSSIBLE confounding factor had any effect. More than that, when asked to you posted things that impact polling studies in GENERAL and could not say how any of these things were at all tied to your POSSIBLE confounding factor. >>> >>> Nah, I got that you're now trying to sell the idea that people won't lie on surveys >>> to any significant extent. >> >> In other words, you "get" something that is not true. > > No, it's true you're a hypocrite, you prove it virtually every day. I suspect snit is mentally retarded.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 17:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6c7231f6-a03f-4fa4-866a-430825ba8a0c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #461047 |
On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 6:04:35 PM UTC-6, GasPipe wrote: > On Fri, 3 Aug 2018 16:47:18 -0700 (PDT), Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 5:16:49 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 8/3/18 4:06 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> ... > >>>> Sigh. You really need to have someone help you understand what you read. You made a good point about a POSSIBLE confounding factor. What you did NOT do was show that this POSSIBLE confounding factor had any effect. More than that, when asked to you posted things that impact polling studies in GENERAL and could not say how any of these things were at all tied to your POSSIBLE confounding factor. > >>> > >>> Nah, I got that you're now trying to sell the idea that people won't lie on surveys > >>> to any significant extent. > >> > >> In other words, you "get" something that is not true. > > > > No, it's true you're a hypocrite, you prove it virtually every day. > > I suspect snit is mentally retarded. If there's a version of it that cause one to lie pathologically... no doubt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 17:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <LNl9D.29326$vh4.20980@fx37.iad> |
| In reply to | #461047 |
On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 20:04:33 -0400, GasPipe wrote: > On Fri, 3 Aug 2018 16:47:18 -0700 (PDT), Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 5:16:49 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 8/3/18 4:06 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> ... >>>>> Sigh. You really need to have someone help you understand what you >>>>> read. You made a good point about a POSSIBLE confounding factor. >>>>> What you did NOT do was show that this POSSIBLE confounding factor >>>>> had any effect. More than that, when asked to you posted things that >>>>> impact polling studies in GENERAL and could not say how any of these >>>>> things were at all tied to your POSSIBLE confounding factor. >>>> >>>> Nah, I got that you're now trying to sell the idea that people won't >>>> lie on surveys to any significant extent. >>> >>> In other words, you "get" something that is not true. >> >> No, it's true you're a hypocrite, you prove it virtually every day. > > I suspect snit is mentally retarded. Your suspicions have been confirmed repeatedly. I'm surprised it doesn't trouble functional people like chrisv to know that they agree with Snit on most everything politically. Maybe they will soon start talking about how Linux needs more consistency to improve productivity and reduce errors. -- SilverSlimer Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD Proudly blocking Facebook, Twitter and Youtube Liberals will be killfiled
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 11:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsmaccFa6d6U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #461133 |
On 8/4/18 10:56 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 20:04:33 -0400, GasPipe wrote: > >> On Fri, 3 Aug 2018 16:47:18 -0700 (PDT), Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 5:16:49 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 8/3/18 4:06 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> ... >>>>>> Sigh. You really need to have someone help you understand what you >>>>>> read. You made a good point about a POSSIBLE confounding factor. >>>>>> What you did NOT do was show that this POSSIBLE confounding factor >>>>>> had any effect. More than that, when asked to you posted things that >>>>>> impact polling studies in GENERAL and could not say how any of these >>>>>> things were at all tied to your POSSIBLE confounding factor. >>>>> >>>>> Nah, I got that you're now trying to sell the idea that people won't >>>>> lie on surveys to any significant extent. >>>> >>>> In other words, you "get" something that is not true. >>> >>> No, it's true you're a hypocrite, you prove it virtually every day. >> >> I suspect snit is mentally retarded. > > Your suspicions have been confirmed repeatedly. > > I'm surprised it doesn't trouble functional people like chrisv to know > that they agree with Snit on most everything politically. Maybe they will > soon start talking about how Linux needs more consistency to improve > productivity and reduce errors. > You posted about concerns of a lack of consistency just the other day. LOL! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 17:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsk95dFqpedU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #461045 |
On 8/3/18 4:47 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 5:16:49 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 8/3/18 4:06 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> ... >>>> Sigh. You really need to have someone help you understand what you read. You made a good point about a POSSIBLE confounding factor. What you did NOT do was show that this POSSIBLE confounding factor had any effect. More than that, when asked to you posted things that impact polling studies in GENERAL and could not say how any of these things were at all tied to your POSSIBLE confounding factor. >>> >>> Nah, I got that you're now trying to sell the idea that people won't lie on surveys >>> to any significant extent. >> >> In other words, you "get" something that is not true. > > No, it's true you're a hypocrite, you prove it virtually every day. > You AGAIN get called out on your lies, with quotes, and you turn it around and play victim. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 12:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vXX8D.5554$r04.1039@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #460892 |
On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 13:13:30 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 2:03:14 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> >> When I saw you spewing insults and playing victim I barely skimmed. >> > >> > I doubt it would've mattered how much time you spent trying to >> > comprehend it, >> > but, hey... any excuse in a storm, right? ;) >> > >> > >> So, no. Not even you can find a point in your tantrum. OK. > > LOL! WTF are you smoking now? I made a "point", in fact, you even > called it a "good point" as you agreed with me it "might lead to a > higher level of caution" by respondents: > > "... the bigotry against Muslims might lead to a higher level of caution > in such things. I can see that... good point." - Snit Whether the Prescott Parasite wants to admit it or not, it's _good_ for citizens to be cautious around new people. These monsters don't deserve for residents to welcome them with open arms considering the reputation they've given themselves over 1,400 years, how they continue to kill innocent people, how their leaders continue to preach hatred and how the same people have been quoted as saying that their intent, in coming to the West, is to conquer. Instead of opening your arms to all, suffering from terrorism and finding the exceptions to the rule, how about hating them all, not suffering from terrorism and embracing the exceptions to the rule? -- SilverSlimer Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD Proudly blocking Facebook, Twitter and Youtube Liberals will be killfiled
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 14:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsjvmdForj8U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #460961 |
On 8/3/18 5:32 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 13:13:30 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 2:03:14 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> >>>>> When I saw you spewing insults and playing victim I barely skimmed. >>>> >>>> I doubt it would've mattered how much time you spent trying to >>>> comprehend it, >>>> but, hey... any excuse in a storm, right? ;) >>>> >>>> >>> So, no. Not even you can find a point in your tantrum. OK. >> >> LOL! WTF are you smoking now? I made a "point", in fact, you even >> called it a "good point" as you agreed with me it "might lead to a >> higher level of caution" by respondents: >> >> "... the bigotry against Muslims might lead to a higher level of caution >> in such things. I can see that... good point." - Snit > > Whether the Prescott Parasite wants to admit it or not, it's _good_ for > citizens to be cautious around new people. And for many you are a new person. OK. > These monsters don't deserve > for residents to welcome them with open arms considering the reputation > they've given themselves over 1,400 years, how they continue to kill > innocent people, how their leaders continue to preach hatred and how the > same people have been quoted as saying that their intent, in coming to > the West, is to conquer. And you apply that just as much to Christians as to Muslims, right? > Instead of opening your arms to all, suffering from terrorism and finding > the exceptions to the rule, how about hating them all, not suffering from > terrorism and embracing the exceptions to the rule? Make a rule and apply it to Muslims, Christians, and others EQUALLY. But that goes against your desire for special entitlements for Christians. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Helinka Svoboda <helinkasvoboda@protestant.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 23:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pk2p24$l3q$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #460961 |
On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 12:32:27 +0000, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 13:13:30 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 2:03:14 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> >>> >> When I saw you spewing insults and playing victim I barely skimmed. >>> > >>> > I doubt it would've mattered how much time you spent trying to >>> > comprehend it, >>> > but, hey... any excuse in a storm, right? ;) >>> > >>> > >>> So, no. Not even you can find a point in your tantrum. OK. >> >> LOL! WTF are you smoking now? I made a "point", in fact, you even >> called it a "good point" as you agreed with me it "might lead to a >> higher level of caution" by respondents: >> >> "... the bigotry against Muslims might lead to a higher level of >> caution in such things. I can see that... good point." - Snit > > Whether the Prescott Parasite wants to admit it or not, it's _good_ for > citizens to be cautious around new people. These monsters don't deserve > for residents to welcome them with open arms considering the reputation > they've given themselves over 1,400 years, how they continue to kill > innocent people, how their leaders continue to preach hatred and how the > same people have been quoted as saying that their intent, in coming to > the West, is to conquer. > > Instead of opening your arms to all, suffering from terrorism and > finding the exceptions to the rule, how about hating them all, not > suffering from terrorism and embracing the exceptions to the rule? It cracks me up when liberals start the "this country was founded on immigration" crap. Yea. Those people accepted and worshipped, appreciated the freedom they got here in the USA. I'm talking 1800's, 1900's. Sure they kept their culture which is why we have Chinatown in San Fran and Little Italy in NYC but at the same time they adopted the culture of the USA. They certainly did not demand that the people here in USA adopt THEIR culture. That is the difference between then and now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 17:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsk948FqpedU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #461044 |
On 8/3/18 4:38 PM, Helinka Svoboda wrote: > On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 12:32:27 +0000, SilverSlimer wrote: > >> On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 13:13:30 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 2:03:14 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> >>>>>> When I saw you spewing insults and playing victim I barely skimmed. >>>>> >>>>> I doubt it would've mattered how much time you spent trying to >>>>> comprehend it, >>>>> but, hey... any excuse in a storm, right? ;) >>>>> >>>>> >>>> So, no. Not even you can find a point in your tantrum. OK. >>> >>> LOL! WTF are you smoking now? I made a "point", in fact, you even >>> called it a "good point" as you agreed with me it "might lead to a >>> higher level of caution" by respondents: >>> >>> "... the bigotry against Muslims might lead to a higher level of >>> caution in such things. I can see that... good point." - Snit >> >> Whether the Prescott Parasite wants to admit it or not, it's _good_ for >> citizens to be cautious around new people. These monsters don't deserve >> for residents to welcome them with open arms considering the reputation >> they've given themselves over 1,400 years, how they continue to kill >> innocent people, how their leaders continue to preach hatred and how the >> same people have been quoted as saying that their intent, in coming to >> the West, is to conquer. >> >> Instead of opening your arms to all, suffering from terrorism and >> finding the exceptions to the rule, how about hating them all, not >> suffering from terrorism and embracing the exceptions to the rule? > > It cracks me up when liberals start the "this country was founded on > immigration" crap. > Yea. > Those people accepted and worshipped, appreciated the freedom they got > here in the USA. The natives or the immigrants? > I'm talking 1800's, 1900's. Sure they kept their culture > which is why we have Chinatown in San Fran and Little Italy in NYC but at > the same time they adopted the culture of the USA. They certainly did not > demand that the people here in USA adopt THEIR culture. Who is? > That is the difference between then and now. What demands have been put onto you? By whom? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-02 11:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5bC8D.459$uJ7.153@fx13.iad> |
| In reply to | #460819 |
On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 02:53:57 +0000, Helinka Svoboda wrote: > On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 21:34:31 -0400, GasPipe wrote: > >> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 23:20:50 -0000 (UTC), Helinka Svoboda wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 15:02:44 +0000, SilverSlimer wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 22:51:39 +0000, Helinka Svoboda wrote: >>>> >>>>> At least snit provides data to back up his opinion. Something his >>>>> adversaries rarely do. Also I do not understand the personal attacks >>>>> waged against snit. His personal life should have no bearing on his >>>>> posting his opinions here. >>>>> I stumbled upon this group while doing some research on Muslim >>>>> immigration and found some of the posts here very interesting. I >>>>> also happen to use Linux so I guess that's a good thing although I >>>>> don't see very much discussion of Linux here. >>>> >>>> Snit is the reason we don't speak about Linux. >>>> >>>> I've taken your position before and given Snit the benefit of the >>>> doubt. >>>> Trust me when I tell you that I regret ever having done that. Even >>>> when you agree with him, he will argue with you and say that you said >>>> something which you never did. He just loves to troll. >>> >>> Looking at the volume of posts he makes I would venture a guess that >>> he is a retired or possibly disabled person who is lonely and these >>> discussion groups are his only contact with other people. >>> Whatever, I will take your and the others advice into consideration as >>> the deeper I dig the more I conclude that the general consensus is >>> that snit is a crank who is best left alone. >>> I will join the rest of you and not encourage his trolling. He's just >>> entered my bozo bin. >>> Thank you for the advice. >> >> Snit, whose real name is Michael Glasser is a complete loser who has >> convinced doctors that he suffers from numerous medical conditions >> which prevent him from working. He is a parasite who sits home and >> trolls USENET looking for victims. You are smart to ignore snit but >> just in case you need some further evidence here is a website that has >> collected posts from people who have had encounters with the snit >> troll. And this is only the tip of the iceberg as the list is outdated >> and snit has invaded other USENET groups that he has trashed but they >> are not represented in these lists. >> Have fun! >> >> "The Snit List 163 People Who Condemn Snit Michael Glasser's Psychopath >> Behaviors". >> >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >> >> "Snit Michael Glasser -- Psychopath" >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html > > OMG! > I had no idea. I don't think I have ever encountered a person who has so > many people willing to go on the record expressing their collective > disdain for another human. If you want to see it first-hand, just have a conversation with the thing. I give you a month, tops, before you want to put your hands around the pansy's neck. > Is snit a practicing Muslim? Not yet but once the population of Muslims in America reaches about 10% and they start demanding Sharia law, he will be the first to submit and convert because they raised their voice at him. > The reason I ask is because I have been studying Muslim immigration and > the socioeconomic data related to mass immigration by a single culture > and the only people I have encountered so far that defend at all costs > the Muslim immigration situation are Muslims themselves. Of course there > are others, non Muslims, who support mass immigration however when > pinned down with specific cause and effect situations they usually back > track and attempt to clarify their position which usually means they > water it down. > Snit OTOH is an unwavering spokesperson for Muslims and Muslim > immigration which in and of itself, at least in my experience, dictates > that snit is indeed a Muslim himself. > I don't know this so I'm just asking. Considering how Islam allows Muslims to lie about who they are and even pretend that they've converted to Christianity, I wouldn't put it past him to pretend to be an atheist. As long as the end goal is the growth of Islam, Muslims can turn into whatever they want as Muhammad's own followers have done. -- SilverSlimer Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD Proudly blocking Facebook, Twitter and Youtube Liberals will be killfiled
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | anonymouse <anonymousey666@swamper.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-01 15:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pjt0ta$1a4j$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #460637 |
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 22:51:39 -0000 (UTC), Helinka Svoboda wrote: > At least snit provides data to back up his opinion. Something his > adversaries rarely do. Also I do not understand the personal attacks > waged against snit. His personal life should have no bearing on his > posting his opinions here. > I stumbled upon this group while doing some research on Muslim > immigration and found some of the posts here very interesting. I also > happen to use Linux so I guess that's a good thing although I don't see > very much discussion of Linux here. I suggest that you do some additional research regarding snit because he is one of the most active trolls on Usenet. His research is usually garbage and even when he agrees with other posters he will start an argument based upon some minutia usually related to his lack of reading comprehension skills. The instant snit enters a thread, that thread is generally trashed because it turns into what we call "the snit circus". Just so you are aware, many, many, many others started out like your post and literally 99.99 percent of them ended up filtering snit. If you continue posting in this group you will end up disgusted with snit as well. It's just the way he is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-01 12:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <de4ddb7a-9fbb-451a-9790-027ad80e0974@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #460784 |
On Wednesday, August 1, 2018 at 1:16:03 PM UTC-6, anonymouse wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 22:51:39 -0000 (UTC), Helinka Svoboda wrote: > > > At least snit provides data to back up his opinion. Something his > > adversaries rarely do. Also I do not understand the personal attacks > > waged against snit. His personal life should have no bearing on his > > posting his opinions here. > > I stumbled upon this group while doing some research on Muslim > > immigration and found some of the posts here very interesting. I also > > happen to use Linux so I guess that's a good thing although I don't see > > very much discussion of Linux here. > > I suggest that you do some additional research regarding snit <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!activity/comp.os.linux.advocacy/uRlIeR3zCwAJ>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-01 12:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fseghiFgno7U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #460785 |
On 8/1/18 12:20 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, August 1, 2018 at 1:16:03 PM UTC-6, anonymouse wrote: >> On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 22:51:39 -0000 (UTC), Helinka Svoboda wrote: >> >>> At least snit provides data to back up his opinion. Something his >>> adversaries rarely do. Also I do not understand the personal attacks >>> waged against snit. His personal life should have no bearing on his >>> posting his opinions here. >>> I stumbled upon this group while doing some research on Muslim >>> immigration and found some of the posts here very interesting. I also >>> happen to use Linux so I guess that's a good thing although I don't see >>> very much discussion of Linux here. >> >> I suggest that you do some additional research regarding snit > > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!activity/comp.os.linux.advocacy/uRlIeR3zCwAJ> > > I suspected he was one of your socks causing trouble, but whatever. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-01 12:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsegmiFgno7U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #460784 |
On 8/1/18 12:15 PM, anonymouse wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 22:51:39 -0000 (UTC), Helinka Svoboda wrote: > >> At least snit provides data to back up his opinion. Something his >> adversaries rarely do. Also I do not understand the personal attacks >> waged against snit. His personal life should have no bearing on his >> posting his opinions here. >> I stumbled upon this group while doing some research on Muslim >> immigration and found some of the posts here very interesting. I also >> happen to use Linux so I guess that's a good thing although I don't see >> very much discussion of Linux here. > > I suggest that you do some additional research regarding snit because he is > one of the most active trolls on Usenet. His research is usually garbage > and even when he agrees with other posters he will start an argument based > upon some minutia usually related to his lack of reading comprehension > skills. The instant snit enters a thread, that thread is generally trashed > because it turns into what we call "the snit circus". > > Just so you are aware, many, many, many others started out like your post > and literally 99.99 percent of them ended up filtering snit. If you > continue posting in this group you will end up disgusted with snit as well. > It's just the way he is. > Judge people by what they say. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-01 22:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <0aq8D.8$UX7.3@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #460784 |
On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 15:15:56 -0400, anonymouse wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 22:51:39 -0000 (UTC), Helinka Svoboda wrote: > >> At least snit provides data to back up his opinion. Something his >> adversaries rarely do. Also I do not understand the personal attacks >> waged against snit. His personal life should have no bearing on his >> posting his opinions here. >> I stumbled upon this group while doing some research on Muslim >> immigration and found some of the posts here very interesting. I also >> happen to use Linux so I guess that's a good thing although I don't see >> very much discussion of Linux here. > > I suggest that you do some additional research regarding snit because he > is one of the most active trolls on Usenet. His research is usually > garbage and even when he agrees with other posters he will start an > argument based upon some minutia usually related to his lack of reading > comprehension skills. The instant snit enters a thread, that thread is > generally trashed because it turns into what we call "the snit circus". The only way to keep threads clean of Snit is to make sure that every participant has that turd in their killfiles. If even one of them gives that piece of excrement the benefit of the doubt, there is no restoring order. He's like some sort of Annoybot that's been permanently set to its highest setting. > Just so you are aware, many, many, many others started out like your > post and literally 99.99 percent of them ended up filtering snit. If you > continue posting in this group you will end up disgusted with snit as > well. > It's just the way he is. He's as annoying as a chihuahua with a cocaine addiction. -- SilverSlimer Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD Proudly blocking Facebook, Twitter and Youtube Liberals will be killfiled
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web