Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #461015
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: I don't agree with snit however... |
| Date | 2018-08-03 14:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsk0hjFp1l9U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (18 earlier) <eacffa6a-1a04-49dc-9285-f4ff40ec20f7@googlegroups.com> <fshad9F6aalU1@mid.individual.net> <17be7f2b-1f0e-43f4-a605-c616fc3a1f11@googlegroups.com> <fshmsnF8t23U2@mid.individual.net> <996adb08-e4dc-4af9-bd1a-64b97c237898@googlegroups.com> |
On 8/3/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 6:45:14 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 8/2/18 2:26 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 3:12:13 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> >>>>>> Right... that is a good point. >>>>> >>>>> But it's not so "good" that it would, in your mind, actually have any >>>>> "impact" on a respondent >>>> >>>> A claim you made up about my views. >>> >>> If it was all that "good" a point, why wouldn't you be able to speak >>> more solidly about its "impact"? >> >> The claim you made up and attributed to was not good... and I have no >> desire to speak in detail about your lies about me. > > Pivoting... again? Why is it so important to you that I speak in detail about the claims you falsely attribute to me? >>> It's not like you're not aware people >>> *do* lie on surveys, even you've brought that into past arguments. >> >> Gee, and here you go into la-la land bringing up topics as if they have >> EVER been under contention. > > Said the guy who's questioning the "impact" of the "good point". Sigh. You really need to have someone help you understand what you read. You made a good point about a POSSIBLE confounding factor. What you did NOT do was show that this POSSIBLE confounding factor had any effect. More than that, when asked to you posted things that impact polling studies in GENERAL and could not say how any of these things were at all tied to your POSSIBLE confounding factor. >>> I'm now wondering what "good" means in your mind if it can't be >>> used to back an idea that you've already expressed when it suited >>> you. >>> >>>> So, do you have any such evidence? If not then it is an unknown, but >>>> certainly something to consider. >>> >>> Why do you believe this is an unknown for Muslims, especially on this >>> particular topic? >> >> Gee, you noted how there might be specific considerations for Muslims >> based on the bigotry they face, I agreed this was a good point, and now >> you want me to explain it to you. > > Nope. So stop asking me to! > What I want explained is your questioning of the impact as this > scenario is based solely on the respondents being Muslims. You want to know why I am questioning the level of impact, if any, of a POSSIBLE confounding factor you did not show had any ACTUAL impact, and for which YOU changed the topic from as you quoted irrelevant issues with polls. Sigh. I really do make it too easy for you to get the attention you beg for... you are not even trying to make sense... just spewing bot-generated insults and accusations and the like. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
I don't agree with snit however... Helinka Svoboda <helinkasvoboda@protestant.com> - 2018-07-31 22:51 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 04:05 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-31 21:14 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-01 15:02 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 08:57 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-01 16:04 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 10:56 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 11:13 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Helinka Svoboda <helinkasvoboda@protestant.com> - 2018-08-01 23:20 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-01 23:33 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 18:00 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 17:59 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-08-01 21:34 -0400
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-02 01:48 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 19:45 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Helinka Svoboda <helinkasvoboda@protestant.com> - 2018-08-02 02:53 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 19:54 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-08-01 23:16 -0400
Re: I don't agree with snit however... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-02 06:47 -0500
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 13:40 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-02 11:54 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 13:40 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 08:13 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-02 15:29 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 09:44 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 10:49 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 09:46 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 10:39 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 11:27 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 12:26 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 12:40 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 12:44 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 13:03 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 13:13 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 13:26 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 13:50 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 14:12 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 14:26 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 17:45 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 08:30 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-03 14:42 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 16:06 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-03 16:16 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 16:47 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-08-03 20:04 -0400
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 17:09 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-04 17:56 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 11:42 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-03 17:09 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-03 12:32 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-03 14:27 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Helinka Svoboda <helinkasvoboda@protestant.com> - 2018-08-03 23:38 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-03 17:08 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-02 11:47 +0000
Re: I don't agree with snit however... anonymouse <anonymousey666@swamper.org> - 2018-08-01 15:15 -0400
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 12:20 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 12:38 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 12:41 -0700
Re: I don't agree with snit however... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-01 22:06 +0000
csiph-web