Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #458532 > unrolled thread
| Started by | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-20 15:18 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-07-20 14:20 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 115 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 15:18 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:29 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 16:05 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 20:58 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-21 16:13 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 09:52 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 17:18 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 12:42 -0500
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 12:53 -0500
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 18:19 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 21:08 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 14:36 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 18:17 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 11:43 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 21:16 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-21 16:25 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-23 07:22 -0500
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 05:38 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-23 08:04 -0500
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 06:10 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 08:00 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-23 14:12 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 07:28 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-23 11:07 -0500
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 09:20 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-23 17:00 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 10:22 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-23 12:35 -0500
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-23 23:01 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 02:00 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-24 07:01 -0500
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 05:23 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-24 12:24 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 06:58 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-24 07:43 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 08:00 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-24 15:13 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-25 15:04 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 16:08 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 08:30 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 08:47 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 13:14 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 14:56 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 14:58 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 15:03 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 15:12 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 15:35 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 16:29 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 17:40 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 17:42 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 15:19 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-26 22:54 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 16:19 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 16:38 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 16:34 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 17:41 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 19:24 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 12:36 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 13:18 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 13:33 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 14:31 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-28 08:25 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-28 08:35 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-28 09:04 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 22:02 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 20:44 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 13:44 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 14:31 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 12:41 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-26 07:30 -0500
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 05:57 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-26 14:16 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-23 14:30 -0500
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 12:51 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-23 23:04 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 12:43 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 12:42 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 12:38 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 13:33 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 21:06 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 16:18 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-21 16:22 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 09:32 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 13:05 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 13:49 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:33 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 12:44 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 13:02 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 13:17 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 13:19 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 16:21 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 16:31 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 18:07 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 20:35 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 17:50 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-21 21:09 -0400
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 18:48 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-21 21:50 -0400
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 18:59 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 19:13 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 03:50 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 15:34 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 10:08 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 11:06 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 18:58 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 17:24 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 17:32 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 11:28 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 12:07 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 12:39 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 12:55 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 14:52 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 01:42 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 22:21 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 14:20 -0700
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 14:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <eaad3ea1-3fc4-4f2c-bf99-697eadcb5f6d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459890 |
On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 2:33:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/27/18 1:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 1:36:24 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/27/18 12:24 PM, RonB wrote: > > > >>> Stating the obvious (that women and men are different) is "bigotry" now? > >> > >> How so? > > > > Why did you answer a question with a question? Never mind, we know why ;) > > Because the clear implication is that someone is suggesting so Uh.. that was *you* who 'suggested' it. > >>> Did > >>> they accidentally flush "Snit's" brain down the toilet when he was born? > >> > >> All too common with conservatives -- one conservative (Slimer) posts an > >> idiotic straw man and then another conservative (RonB) acts like it is > >> true. They do this out of ignorance and to kill the initial topic. > > > > LOL! Face it, Snit, there's no reason someone shouldn't come away with that > > as based on what you tried to do here. > > See, here YOU claim to come to that same false conclusion. Wow... you not only fail to comprehend what you read, you fail to do so with what you write. > Can you explain how you arrived at such an erroneous idea? To you? I highly doubt it, as the original statements and quoted material were from you and you still missed this alleged "erroneous" idea. BTW, isn't it "interesting" how you didn't address what I quoted in my last post? LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-28 08:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fs3g85F1md2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459905 |
On 7/27/18 2:31 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 2:33:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/27/18 1:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 1:36:24 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 7/27/18 12:24 PM, RonB wrote: >>> >>>>> Stating the obvious (that women and men are different) is "bigotry" now? >>>> >>>> How so? >>> >>> Why did you answer a question with a question? Never mind, we know why ;) >> >> Because the clear implication is that someone is suggesting so > > Uh.. that was *you* who 'suggested' it. > >>>>> Did >>>>> they accidentally flush "Snit's" brain down the toilet when he was born? >>>> >>>> All too common with conservatives -- one conservative (Slimer) posts an >>>> idiotic straw man and then another conservative (RonB) acts like it is >>>> true. They do this out of ignorance and to kill the initial topic. >>> >>> LOL! Face it, Snit, there's no reason someone shouldn't come away with that >>> as based on what you tried to do here. >> >> See, here YOU claim to come to that same false conclusion. > > Wow... you not only fail to comprehend what you read, you fail to do so > with what you write. > >> Can you explain how you arrived at such an erroneous idea? > > To you? I highly doubt it, as the original statements and quoted material were > from you and you still missed this alleged "erroneous" idea. > > BTW, isn't it "interesting" how you didn't address what I quoted in my last post? > > LOL! > When we had a misunderstanding about your view on mental health and mass shooters you gave a correction and I accepted it. No digging back through the thread, no trying to find "blame", no games. I just moved forward. Are you able to do the same here? You are simply not understanding me. I am not and have not said that speaking of the differences between men and women is, in itself, bigotry. Period. Are you able to move forward as I did, or are you going to focus on meta-debates, blame, and your other games? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-28 08:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e64d0514-e881-4d91-a3e6-839446f788ce@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459982 |
On Saturday, July 28, 2018 at 9:26:00 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/27/18 2:31 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 2:33:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/27/18 1:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 1:36:24 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 7/27/18 12:24 PM, RonB wrote: > >>> > >>>>> Stating the obvious (that women and men are different) is "bigotry" now? > >>>> > >>>> How so? > >>> > >>> Why did you answer a question with a question? Never mind, we know why ;) > >> > >> Because the clear implication is that someone is suggesting so > > > > Uh.. that was *you* who 'suggested' it. > > > >>>>> Did > >>>>> they accidentally flush "Snit's" brain down the toilet when he was born? > >>>> > >>>> All too common with conservatives -- one conservative (Slimer) posts an > >>>> idiotic straw man and then another conservative (RonB) acts like it is > >>>> true. They do this out of ignorance and to kill the initial topic. > >>> > >>> LOL! Face it, Snit, there's no reason someone shouldn't come away with that > >>> as based on what you tried to do here. > >> > >> See, here YOU claim to come to that same false conclusion. > > > > Wow... you not only fail to comprehend what you read, you fail to do so > > with what you write. > > > >> Can you explain how you arrived at such an erroneous idea? > > > > To you? I highly doubt it, as the original statements and quoted material were > > from you and you still missed this alleged "erroneous" idea. > > > > BTW, isn't it "interesting" how you didn't address what I quoted in my last post? > > > > LOL! > > > When we had a misunderstanding about your view We didn't you did. Being that you tried to spin it... again, the rest of your post is disqualified.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-28 09:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fs3iggF23c2U7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459985 |
On 7/28/18 8:35 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: Again you could not even quote my whole content... you felt you had to snip and play the blame game... proving me correct. ----- When we had a misunderstanding about your view on mental health and mass shooters you gave a correction and I accepted it. No digging back through the thread, no trying to find "blame", no games. I just moved forward. Are you able to do the same here? You are simply not understanding me. I am not and have not said that speaking of the differences between men and women is, in itself, bigotry. Period. Are you able to move forward as I did, or are you going to focus on meta-debates, blame, and your other games? ----- The answer is "no" -- you cannot move forward, you HAVE to play the blame game and you NEVER can move on. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 22:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6388f93a-0597-4a9a-80aa-98638e598de5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459999 |
On Saturday, July 28, 2018 at 9:04:35 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 7/28/18 8:35 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > Again you could not even quote my whole content... you felt you had to > snip and play the blame game... proving me correct. > > ----- > When we had a misunderstanding about your view on mental health and mass > shooters you gave a correction and I accepted it. No digging back > through the thread, no trying to find "blame", no games. I just moved > forward. > > Are you able to do the same here? You are simply not understanding me. I > am not and have not said that speaking of the differences between men > and women is, in itself, bigotry. Period. > > Are you able to move forward as I did, or are you going to focus on > meta-debates, blame, and your other games? > ----- > > The answer is "no" -- you cannot move forward, you HAVE to play the > blame game and you NEVER can move on. > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> Why would you want to limit all scripts on Mint to what can be done on PCs and Macs? I've worked in or with the OEM PC industry for 15 years. I have served multibillion dollar companies selling to governments and the communications industry. Never, not at any time, were we ever instructed not to offer any other OS. We sold Netware, Apple II, System V, among others as well as Windows very successfully. I thought showing someone a little generosity might help the situation. It did not. Klaus Schadenfreude and the advocates insist searching for a suggestion for a FOSS application is wrong. -- Top Six Ways Jeff Relf Trolls http://www.5z8.info/killallimmigrants_j6f7mm_gruesome-gunshot-wounds Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 20:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7ee323b8-3d33-4c51-90bf-302b54d6b031@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459985 |
On Saturday, July 28, 2018 at 8:35:03 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Saturday, July 28, 2018 at 9:26:00 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> > On 7/27/18 2:31 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 2:33:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> > >> On 7/27/18 1:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > >>> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 1:36:24 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> > >>>> On 7/27/18 12:24 PM, RonB wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>>> Stating the obvious (that women and men are different) is "bigotry" now?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> How so?
> > >>>
> > >>> Why did you answer a question with a question? Never mind, we know why ;)
> > >>
> > >> Because the clear implication is that someone is suggesting so
> > >
> > > Uh.. that was *you* who 'suggested' it.
> > >
> > >>>>> Did
> > >>>>> they accidentally flush "Snit's" brain down the toilet when he was born?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> All too common with conservatives -- one conservative (Slimer) posts an
> > >>>> idiotic straw man and then another conservative (RonB) acts like it is
> > >>>> true. They do this out of ignorance and to kill the initial topic.
> > >>>
> > >>> LOL! Face it, Snit, there's no reason someone shouldn't come away with that
> > >>> as based on what you tried to do here.
> > >>
> > >> See, here YOU claim to come to that same false conclusion.
> > >
> > > Wow... you not only fail to comprehend what you read, you fail to do so
> > > with what you write.
> > >
> > >> Can you explain how you arrived at such an erroneous idea?
> > >
> > > To you? I highly doubt it, as the original statements and quoted material were
> > > from you and you still missed this alleged "erroneous" idea.
> > >
> > > BTW, isn't it "interesting" how you didn't address what I quoted in my last post?
> > >
> > > LOL!
> > >
> > When we had a misunderstanding about your view
>
> We didn't you did. Being that you tried to spin it... again, the rest of your
> post is disqualified.
Just some names Steven Petruzzellis has used
"Evil" John *
"Evil" Snit *
Big Crotch on a Small Fish
Cornelius Munshower
CSMA Moderator
Edward Stanfield
Fretwiz *
Hitman Hero
Measles
Petruzzellis Kids
Sigmond
Slaveen
Smit
Steve C *
Steve Camoll *
Steve Carroll <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll <stevecarroll@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll <trollkiller@xxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll's Dog *
Steve Carrolll *
Steve Carrroll *
Yevette Owens
Yobo_Obyo
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB showed himself to be a charlatan by pretending to not rebut Klaus Schadenfreude by veraciously trumpeting 'score: -999' and then abusing him repeatedly through piggybacking. Windows Mobile, runs on the Cooledit kernel. So yeah, Cooledit is mobile. Cooledit is a super computer. Cooledit is a server. Cooledit is a desktop. Cooledit is growing in market share. Sadly this is what arises when seriously bad self esteem takes over Jonas Eklundh Communication AB's persona.
-
Top Six Ways Jonas Eklundh Communication AB Trolls
https://goo.gl/Fho5Nq
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 13:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6017cb14-bdfb-4831-894e-3c045216c4b2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459887 |
On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 1:18:34 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 1:36:24 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > On 7/27/18 12:24 PM, RonB wrote: > > > > Stating the obvious (that women and men are different) is "bigotry" now? > > > > How so? > > Why did you answer a question with a question? Never mind, we know why ;) > > > > Did > > > they accidentally flush "Snit's" brain down the toilet when he was born? > > > > All too common with conservatives -- one conservative (Slimer) posts an > > idiotic straw man and then another conservative (RonB) acts like it is > > true. They do this out of ignorance and to kill the initial topic. > > LOL! Face it, Snit, there's no reason someone shouldn't come away with that > as based on what you tried to do here. You'll dismiss any contrary opinion, like > the following, simply because it doesn't fit your narrative: > > "Contrary to what detractors would have you believe, women are, on average, > higher in neuroticism and agreeableness, and lower in stress tolerance." > > <https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/no-the-google-manifesto-isnt-sexist-or-anti-diversity-its-science/article35903359/> > > "Debra Soh writes about the science of human sexuality and holds a PhD in sexual neuroscience from York University." > > But she only "holds a PhD in sexual neuroscience", it's not like she's an IT Master ;) My view: Even if he was barely learning how to scam the government, the notion that acquiring know-how as being one of having "not anything" to show for it doesn't make sense because you'll have the know-how to show for it and understanding is an advantage in life. Steven Petruzzellis has a ton of know-how to show and he seems to want to write tutorials. Unfortunately, this is without a doubt the most frustrating place for doing that because too much of the responses are screaming, misleading, and other hogwash. The herd members value being like everyone else more than they do productivity. I just use an automation and do not see the posts. Sigmond's attack has made a veritable disaster of this group via GG, so I don't endeavor trolling the group with my desktop anymore. One thing he has done with this crap is that the Sigmond plonk will forever stay. Do you have a MCSE certification? Why would you want to limit all commands on Mint to what can be done on lower end systems? The only way that I could condone OS X's constant need for maintenance because of programing troubles or badly written updates is if I consumed the steady amount of pipe dreams its developers have been feeding Sigmond since 2004.It's like a front page hog. Sigmond has already decided what he is going to say before he calls. What you say is irrelevant. What Steven Petruzzellis says is irrelevant. -- E-commerce Simplified!! http://www.5z8.info/mydick_x6g9hr_nakedgrandmas.jpg Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 14:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ee32023a-3478-43bc-9643-199f0e943ff1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459887 |
On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 1:18:34 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 1:36:24 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > On 7/27/18 12:24 PM, RonB wrote: > > > > Stating the obvious (that women and men are different) is "bigotry" now? > > > > How so? > > Why did you answer a question with a question? Never mind, we know why ;) > > > > Did > > > they accidentally flush "Snit's" brain down the toilet when he was born? > > > > All too common with conservatives -- one conservative (Slimer) posts an > > idiotic straw man and then another conservative (RonB) acts like it is > > true. They do this out of ignorance and to kill the initial topic. > > LOL! Face it, Snit, there's no reason someone shouldn't come away with that > as based on what you tried to do here. You'll dismiss any contrary opinion, like > the following, simply because it doesn't fit your narrative: > > "Contrary to what detractors would have you believe, women are, on average, > higher in neuroticism and agreeableness, and lower in stress tolerance." > > <https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/no-the-google-manifesto-isnt-sexist-or-anti-diversity-its-science/article35903359/> > > "Debra Soh writes about the science of human sexuality and holds a PhD in sexual neuroscience from York University." > > But she only "holds a PhD in sexual neuroscience", it's not like she's an IT Master ;) What did you assume from the lying imbecile? That The Thing ass has nothing to squander but time. He has nothing else. Especially not a job. If you have 'some-file.pdf' open in a user space program such as LibreOffice Writer and you want to change its name to 'mack.doc' via a bash script, Klaus Schadenfreude's method might be wise. Just nonsense from The Thing. But The Thing has thoroughly left reason behind and is holding me guilty for the deeds of himself. But when the stats were run, it turns out beyond any doubt, The Thing was far more "neurotic" than Klaus Schadenfreude. -- What Every Entrepreneur Must Know http://www.5z8.info/hack-outlook_c6c9in_michaelangelo-virus Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 12:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <714fda9a-3207-41a2-a194-671f0dc762af@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459859 |
On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 12:24:34 PM UTC-7, RonB wrote: > On 2018-07-26, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:58:35 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > >> On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:56:17 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> On 7/26/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> ... > >>> > Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, > >>> > not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know > >>> > that if you read it) > >>> > >>> <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing- > > manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> > >>> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> > >>> ----- > >>> James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google > >>> message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in > >>> tech because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not > >>> because of any workplace discrimination they may experience. > >>> > >>> The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer > >>> female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by > >>> the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. > >>> ----- > >>> > >>> It was posted on the message board. > >> > >> Fine. So where is this alleged "bigotry"? > > > > James Damore suggesting that there are differences between men and women > > is "bigotry" according to the Prescott Cockroach. > > Stating the obvious (that women and men are different) is "bigotry" now? Did > they accidentally flush "Snit's" brain down the toilet when he was born? > > -- > The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux. Pull up a background check on Jonas Eklundh and you will see that he was in gaol last year. The probes can not go into that extent of specificity and public reports from his jurisdiction are private unless court ordered. Can emoji be concatenated into a string with a logical connection to the "real" world; that is the question posed recently by those astonished at the endless babbling of "advocates" and neck beard freaks. With no evidence at all, as is usual for Jonas Eklundh. Unlike the intelligent people in COLA, Jonas Eklundh relies on false news to concoct beliefs on the news. Therefore, he only is aware of and agrees to the official stories which also are the ones which describe free thought in a acutely hopeful and brave light. - I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened! http://bit.ly/2oNYRgv Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 07:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <evejld1a7f2i6rl3vsc1jpcqe56d7k3l25@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #459504 |
-hh wrote: > >> I find it hilarious that the left has deployed all of its forces to > >> defend James Gunn No it hasn't. He's got some movie-star friends. Quelle surprise. >> >> THAT is alright and the person who was fired MUST get their job back, >> >> right? Wrong. >> > Well, first of all, he's *not* gotten his job back. >> >> Yet. I will not be surprise to see him return to his role amidst standing >> ovations. Pure unsupported conjecture. The propagandist even throws-in some "standing ovation" nonsense. >Well, given his age, it is likely that he will want to work again, >rather than to retire into obscurity. Even felons get paroled, after some time. >> If a socialist makes offensive remarks, the consequences are >> usually, at best, temporary. > >Any examples of this yet? Has Al Franken regained office? The facts show that the lefties get fired, just as the righties do. The right-wing propagandist is trying to conjure-up some "double standard", where none exists. -- 'The point is this : MS have not overcharged or abused their "monopoly" (if you insist we use this word).' - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 05:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <90aaa9bf-604a-4b1f-81e3-ab1a3d7e4ef8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459599 |
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 5:30:56 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > -hh wrote: > > > > >> I find it hilarious that the left has deployed all of its forces to > > >> defend James Gunn > > No it hasn't. He's got some movie-star friends. Quelle surprise. > > >> >> THAT is alright and the person who was fired MUST get their job back, > >> >> right? > > Wrong. > > >> > Well, first of all, he's *not* gotten his job back. > >> > >> Yet. I will not be surprise to see him return to his role amidst standing > >> ovations. > > Pure unsupported conjecture. The propagandist even throws-in some > "standing ovation" nonsense. > > >Well, given his age, it is likely that he will want to work again, > >rather than to retire into obscurity. > > Even felons get paroled, after some time. > > >> If a socialist makes offensive remarks, the consequences are > >> usually, at best, temporary. > > > >Any examples of this yet? Has Al Franken regained office? > > The facts show that the lefties get fired, just as the righties do. > > The right-wing propagandist is trying to conjure-up some "double > standard", where none exists. > > -- > 'The point is this : MS have not overcharged or abused their > "monopoly" (if you insist we use this word).' - "True Linux > advocate" Hadron Quark I think we have different views completely. Ha, ha! That is the problem with millennials and less experienced teachers don't stand a chance, people from smarter generations (~60 yo) should know better than to fall for the indoctrination BS. -- Curious how these posts are made? Email: usenet@gallopinginsanity.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 14:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <HIk6D.475529$DS3.400798@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #459504 |
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:04:26 -0700, -hh wrote: < snip > >> If a socialist makes offensive remarks, the consequences are usually, >> at best, temporary. > > Any examples of this yet? Has Al Franken regained office?< Joy Reid, Stephen Colbert, Bill Maher, Samantha Bee. < snip > -- SilverSlimer Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 14:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8oacld5dahq45hq1efanqv7gl3693hriaa@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #459008 |
chrisv wrote: >Why should anyone believe the self-serving story, >that she had no idea that Jarrett was mixed-race? Frankly, it was a "racist" thing to say, even if Jarrett was white. But I will concede that it's getting a bit ridiculous that people are having their careers ended, the moment that they make such transgressions. I mean, is there no right to be an asshole, in this country? Who among us has never said anything that could be called "racist"? I suppose that it is worse, when someone who is "influential" does it... -- "Human cognitive ability cannot efficiently compare more than five options" - "-hh"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 12:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frmptnF5f0lU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459028 |
On 7/23/18 12:30 PM, chrisv wrote: > chrisv wrote: > >> Why should anyone believe the self-serving story, >> that she had no idea that Jarrett was mixed-race? > > Frankly, it was a "racist" thing to say, even if Jarrett was white. > > But I will concede that it's getting a bit ridiculous that people are > having their careers ended, the moment that they make such > transgressions. > > I mean, is there no right to be an asshole, in this country? Who > among us has never said anything that could be called "racist"? I > suppose that it is worse, when someone who is "influential" does it... > She has a right to be wrong. Others have a right to offer consequences for her being wrong. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 23:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <8at5D.439891$T14.368473@fx44.iad> |
| In reply to | #459028 |
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 14:30:44 -0500, chrisv wrote: > chrisv wrote: > >>Why should anyone believe the self-serving story, >>that she had no idea that Jarrett was mixed-race? > > Frankly, it was a "racist" thing to say, even if Jarrett was white. No, it was not. > But I will concede that it's getting a bit ridiculous that people are > having their careers ended, the moment that they make such > transgressions. > > I mean, is there no right to be an asshole, in this country? Who among > us has never said anything that could be called "racist"? I suppose > that it is worse, when someone who is "influential" does it... People nowadays are highly sensitive and yes, even a comment that mentions race or gender in a critical way is enough. -- SilverSlimer Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD Never apologize Liberalism - One picture, one thousand words: https://kek.gg/i/4xGRhd.jpg Highly recommended reading: - Big Brother: The Orwellian Nightmare Come True (https://kek.gg/u/SrmB) - Questioning Islam: Tough Questions and Honest Answers About the Muslim Religion (https://kek.gg/u/35jND) "Well, I was wrong, for once." - chrisv, being honest, for once.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 12:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frmpfgF5bquU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458998 |
On 7/23/18 7:12 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 08:04:17 -0500, chrisv wrote: > >> chrisv wrote: >> >>> SilverSlimer wrote: >>> >>>> This <http://media-3.web.britannica.com/eb-media/47/127447-050- >>>> DCFEFF78.jpg> is the person you're claiming is black. She's whiter than >>>> I am. She also didn't say that Valerie Jarrett was an ape, she says >>>> that she looks like a cross between a member of the Muslim Brotherhood >>>> and an ape from the movie... which she does. Roseanne was fired for >>>> telling the truth to someone who considers herself to be black when >>>> it's convenient. >>> >>> Well, I was wrong, for once. >> >> OMG. I feel truly stupid, now. I believed something that a right-wing >> propagandist wrote, without first researching the facts. It didn't occur >> to me that he would spew such as bald-faced *lie*. >> >> The fact is that is that one of her parents is black. So, I will repeat >> my earlier question to "Slimer": >> >> You don't think that "one of your parents was an ape" is offensive, to a >> person who is half-black? >> >> You needn't respond. You've shown what you are. As does anyone who >> agrees with you. > > Roseanne looked at a picture of Valerie Jarrett and saw a white person. > She didn't research the woman to make sure that she wasn't 1/16th black > or some other stupid shit before posting the comment. She made an > observation about her looks and posted it immediately to get some laughs > because she's a comedienne. > > To me, a person who has one black parent is mulatto, not black. If they > appear to be white, they are mulatto with no noticeable sign of African > ancestry. Valerie Jarrett has clearly _never_ been oppressed in any way > because of her appearance other than maybe being put into a cage at some > point during her youth because people truly believed that she was a > monkey. > > With that said, I want to say this to anyone who is offended by the use > of a word and this is in response to something I saw on Big Brother last > night where a midget and a black person were going back and forth about > how the use of the word "midget" and "nigger" can be offensive to them > regardless of what context they might be used in. To both of them and > anyone else offended by the word of a word, I say: grow a pair and start > behaving like a man. If the use of a word is enough to destroy you, > you're a sad sack of shit who is way too sensitive. > She almost surely made an attack fully aware of the racist tone of the insult. Her back pedaling (at least initially, I have not followed the story) was not even tied to the idea that it was not. She made a racist comment and it cost her. I have no sympathy for her on that. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 12:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frmpceF5bquU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458993 |
On 7/23/18 6:04 AM, chrisv wrote: > chrisv wrote: > >> SilverSlimer wrote: >> >>> This <http://media-3.web.britannica.com/eb-media/47/127447-050- >>> DCFEFF78.jpg> is the person you're claiming is black. She's whiter than I >>> am. She also didn't say that Valerie Jarrett was an ape, she says that >>> she looks like a cross between a member of the Muslim Brotherhood and an >>> ape from the movie... which she does. Roseanne was fired for telling the >>> truth to someone who considers herself to be black when it's convenient. >> >> Well, I was wrong, for once. > > OMG. I feel truly stupid, now. I believed something that a > right-wing propagandist wrote, without first researching the facts. > It didn't occur to me that he would spew such as bald-faced *lie*. > > The fact is that is that one of her parents is black. So, I will > repeat my earlier question to "Slimer": > > You don't think that "one of your parents was an ape" is offensive, to > a person who is half-black? > > You needn't respond. You've shown what you are. As does anyone who > agrees with you. > Slimer is pretending that Rosanne did not use an ape reference knowing full well that it was a racist attack. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-20 12:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b2f958fd-516f-4e8c-85d7-6c9561a149db@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458584 |
On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 11:42:05 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote: > > >It doesn't even have to be in reference to a black person; it just needs > >to be in proximity of a black person as Roseanne's tweet demonstrated. > >Remember, she said " 溺uslim brotherhood & planet of the apes had a > >baby=vj." Planet of the Apes, as far as I know, is not a movie about > >black people. > > Idiot. It's a movie about apes. > > You don't think that "one of your parents was an ape" is offensive, to > a black person? > > Sheesh! > > >The very fact that people would suggest that there's any > >correlation between the film and black people is racist. > > In the up-is-down, lies-are-truth world of a right-wing propagandist. > > >However, the > >constantly-offended socialists of America still managed to extract that > >from the comment and get her fired. > > It was a racist comment. > > However, I don't know if people should be immediately fired for such > things. The same with what Papa John said. Good point, looks like he was 'Snitted' (taken out of context) to me, by those with an agenda (so it's actually a double 'Snitting'). As for Valerie Jarrett, it seems not everyone views her as all that 'black', so Slimer may have a point, too: <https://medium.com/@politicspeach/why-are-black-people-defending-valerie-jarrett-b169cc2bf637>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-20 13:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fa9bf3ad-b46b-43c0-bfa9-554b076d2ba5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458605 |
On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 12:38:55 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 11:42:05 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote: > > SilverSlimer wrote: > > > > >It doesn't even have to be in reference to a black person; it just needs > > >to be in proximity of a black person as Roseanne's tweet demonstrated. > > >Remember, she said " 溺uslim brotherhood & planet of the apes had a > > >baby=vj." Planet of the Apes, as far as I know, is not a movie about > > >black people. > > > > Idiot. It's a movie about apes. > > > > You don't think that "one of your parents was an ape" is offensive, to > > a black person? > > > > Sheesh! > > > > >The very fact that people would suggest that there's any > > >correlation between the film and black people is racist. > > > > In the up-is-down, lies-are-truth world of a right-wing propagandist. > > > > >However, the > > >constantly-offended socialists of America still managed to extract that > > >from the comment and get her fired. > > > > It was a racist comment. > > > > However, I don't know if people should be immediately fired for such > > things. The same with what Papa John said. > > Good point, looks like he was 'Snitted' (taken out of context) to me, > by those with an agenda (so it's actually a double 'Snitting'). As for > Valerie Jarrett, it seems not everyone views her as all that 'black', so > Slimer may have a point, too: > > <https://medium.com/@politicspeach/why-are-black-people-defending-valerie-jarrett-b169cc2bf637> Idiot. And why the added task to debug JavaScript via an automated phone system in a mobile system? No matter, Steve Petruzzellis didn't state this as part of his unsurprisingly continually changing 'criteria' <whatever>. Why do you keep rephrasing yourself? -- One Smart Penny https://youtu.be/D_so1dvjeyI http://www.5z8.info/michaelangelo-virus_t6v2vq_molotovcocktail http://www.5z8.info/yourdick_v1o3ww_manhunter Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-20 21:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pitisa$4rf$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #458584 |
On 2018-07-20, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote: > >>It doesn't even have to be in reference to a black person; it just needs >>to be in proximity of a black person as Roseanne's tweet demonstrated. >>Remember, she said " Muslim brotherhood & planet of the apes had a >>baby=vj." Planet of the Apes, as far as I know, is not a movie about >>black people. > > Idiot. It's a movie about apes. > > You don't think that "one of your parents was an ape" is offensive, to > a black person? > > Sheesh! The point of "Planet of the Apes" is that the apes were barbaric and dangerous to humans (like Muslim terrorists). But of course a libtard, white wimp would pretend to be offended for blacks in an imaginary slight. Good grief, do libtards spend their whole lives in pursuit of ways to be offended? >>The very fact that people would suggest that there's any >>correlation between the film and black people is racist. > > In the up-is-down, lies-are-truth world of a right-wing propagandist. No, he's got a point. Not being a huge fan of Roseanne, I didn't even know what she said until now. >>However, the >>constantly-offended socialists of America still managed to extract that >>from the comment and get her fired. > > It was a racist comment. Because you say so? Because you're racist to equate the apes in the movie "Planet of the Apes" with blacks, instead of with barbarian terrorist Muslims? > However, I don't know if people should be immediately fired for such > things. The same with what Papa John said. I think it's getting close to time for a little parity here. If whites are automatically fired for *supposed* racist comments (or even genuine racist comments said in anger) than blacks should be held accountable for "honky" and "red neck." Personally I don't give a rat's ass if a black man calls me a honky, but fair is fair. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web