Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #455317 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-06-19 04:48 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-06-19 11:26 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 125 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Does this sound familiar ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-19 04:48 -0700
Re: Does this sound familiar ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-19 09:19 -0500
Karl Marx lived it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-19 08:08 -0700
Re: Karl Marx lived it. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-19 10:23 -0500
Marx lied. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-19 08:53 -0700
Re: Marx lied. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 08:59 -0700
Re: Marx lied. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-19 11:04 -0500
Re: Marx lied. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 09:11 -0700
Re: Marx lied. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-19 11:24 -0500
Re: Marx lied. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-19 11:55 -0500
Re: Marx lied. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-19 17:06 -0400
Re: Marx lied. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-20 07:50 -0500
Re: Marx lied. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-21 03:11 +0000
Somali pirates tax ships, as (para)governments do. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-21 11:36 -0700
Re: Somali pirates tax ships, as (para)governments do. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-21 17:33 -0400
It's my fault. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-21 15:20 -0700
Re: It's my fault. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 15:23 -0700
Re: It's my fault. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-21 23:29 +0100
Re: It's my fault. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 15:38 -0700
Everything decays, even gravity; hence the arrow of time. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-21 16:05 -0700
Re: Everything decays, even gravity; hence the arrow of time. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-22 00:25 +0100
The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-21 22:34 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 22:46 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-22 20:24 +0100
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 12:39 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-22 20:55 +0100
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 13:01 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-22 21:15 +0100
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 13:18 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-22 21:31 +0100
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 14:23 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-22 22:13 +0000
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 15:25 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-22 22:30 +0000
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-22 23:38 +0100
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 15:39 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 18:35 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-22 21:01 -0400
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-22 23:33 +0100
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-23 00:04 +0000
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 17:46 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-23 09:10 +0100
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-23 03:22 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-23 11:31 +0100
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-23 05:16 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-23 13:26 +0100
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 05:41 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-23 05:47 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 05:57 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-23 18:49 +0100
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 10:58 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-25 06:20 +0000
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-25 08:22 +0100
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-25 01:04 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-25 01:01 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2018-06-27 07:13 -0500
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-25 06:17 +0000
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-25 01:10 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-25 08:21 +0000
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-25 01:43 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 11:48 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 03:34 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-23 05:38 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-23 10:10 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 05:08 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-23 05:18 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-24 22:27 +0000
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 15:31 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 15:31 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-24 23:56 +0000
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 16:59 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-25 00:12 +0000
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:17 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:24 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:30 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 18:42 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 19:22 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-25 01:01 +0000
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 18:07 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-25 01:34 +0000
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 19:09 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 19:22 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 19:21 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 20:31 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-25 00:58 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 18:43 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-24 20:30 -0400
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-25 08:11 +0100
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-22 20:59 -0400
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 18:02 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 13:34 -0700
Re: The first goal of ThermoDynamics. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 12:46 -0700
Re: Everything decays, even gravity; hence the arrow of time. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 16:26 -0700
Re: It's my fault. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-21 21:24 -0400
Re: It's my fault. Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 20:39 -0700
Re: It's my fault. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-21 21:23 -0400
Re: Marx lied. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-19 16:54 -0400
Re: Marx lied. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-19 16:04 -0500
Re: Marx lied. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-19 18:31 -0400
Re: Marx lied. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-19 19:13 -0500
Re: Marx lied. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 17:34 -0700
Re: Marx lied. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 18:55 -0700
Re: Marx lied. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-19 16:52 -0400
Marxism didn't work for Marx himself, nor anyone else. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-19 17:36 -0700
Re: Marxism didn't work for Marx himself, nor anyone else. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-19 20:07 -0500
Re: Marx lied. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-19 16:46 -0400
Re: Marx lied. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-19 16:03 -0500
SuperDeterminism is a better religion. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-19 18:14 -0700
Re: SuperDeterminism is a better religion. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-20 03:21 +0000
Does "Bell's Inequality" require perfect knowledge ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-19 23:35 -0700
Re: Does "Bell's Inequality" require perfect knowledge ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-20 12:17 -0400
Re: SuperDeterminism is a better religion. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-20 12:14 -0400
Re: SuperDeterminism is a better religion. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 04:04 -0700
Re: Marx lied. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 14:15 -0700
Re: Marx lied. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-19 18:17 -0400
Re: Marx lied. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 15:29 -0700
Re: Marx lied. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 15:43 -0700
Re: Marx lied. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 19:13 -0700
Re: Marx lied. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-19 11:00 -0500
Not one of Karl Marx's 8 kids did well. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-19 17:28 -0700
Re: Not one of Karl Marx's 8 kids did well. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-19 19:34 -0500
When sane, you prefer the LeastBad "option", not perfection. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-20 01:40 -0700
Re: Karl Marx lived it. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-19 11:58 -0400
Re: Karl Marx lived it. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-19 11:09 -0500
Re: Does this sound familiar ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-19 11:26 -0400
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 17:34 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Marx lied. |
| Message-ID | <f43867f5-9160-4589-8a58-7dd672cdf574@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455411 |
On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 5:13:09 PM UTC-7, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:31:02 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "benj
> <benj@nobody.net>" determined that the following was of great
> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> <IufWC.313149$LR2.224842@fx41.iad>:
>
> >On 6/19/2018 5:04 PM, Your Friendly Neighbourhood 🐶 Whistle Holder
> >Emeritus 🐶笛 wrote:
> >>On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 16:54:27 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "benj
> >><benj@nobody.net>" determined that the following was of great
> >>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> >><94eWC.155618$Mj2.17874@fx22.iad>:
> >>>On 6/19/2018 12:24 PM, Your Friendly Neighbourhood 🐶 Whistle Holder
> >>>Emeritus 🐶笛 wrote:
> >>>>On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:11:50 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Snit
> >>>><usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>" determined that the following was of
> >>>>great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> >>>><fosoa6Fkth5U2@mid.individual.net>:
> >>>>>On 6/19/18 9:04 AM, Your Friendly Neighbourhood 🐶 Whistle Holder
> >>>>>Emeritus 🐶笛 wrote:
> >>>>>>On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 08:59:05 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Snit
> >>>>>><usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>" determined that the following was of
> >>>>>>great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> >>>>>><fosniaFkpalU1@mid.individual.net>:
> >>>>>>>On 6/19/18 8:53 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> >>>>>>>>You ("Your Friendly"[sic]) wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>marx [sic] was a sociologist who predicted the ways that economies
> >>>>>>>>>evolve
> >>>>>>>>Karl Marx's predictions were wrong, obviously. The " I know better than
> >>>>>>>>the market; every detail, always " concept is what's wrong with
> >>>>>>>>feminists and communists. Four of Karl's kids died in childhood; two
> >>>>>>>>committed suicide; Frederick Demuth ( a child of rape ? ) was
> >>>>>>>>abandoned, left in abject povery. Marx lied. If this is what you want,
> >>>>>>>>follow him. Also, if you _need_ to believe that everything is coming to
> >>>>>>>>an end; Marxist Jim Jones has some Kool Aid for you, kook.
> >>>>>>>Given how it is so rare to see ANYONE back Marx it is hard to understand
> >>>>>>>why people on the right focus on him so much for ANY reason other than
> >>>>>>>to try to pull the light off of their own unsupportable views.
> >>>>>>because marx is so "wrong" they have to ironically whinge about him and
> >>>>>>try feebly to politicise his scientific and reasoned sociological and
> >>>>>>economic principles from over 100 years ago, it seems.
> >>>>>What they are trying to do is tie anyone on the left to him, which makes
> >>>>>no sense at all.
> >>>>"clearly", because he and others suffered under a fasciocommunist regime
> >>>>he must have really liked it. conservatives are fucking dullards these
> >>>>days.
> >>>Which is why anyone who isn't among the intelligent liberal elite needs
> >>>to have government to force them to do what is "best" for them. Right?
> >>nobody is forcing you to believe reality instead of FOX news.
> >Sorry, Don't watch FOX. Who forces all you libs to worship the lies on
> >CNN?
>
> i have basic cable. no cnn, sry charlie.
>
> --
> THIS SPACE FOR RENT
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA
>
> "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this
> seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer,
> and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an
> end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell
> everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized
> country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become
> like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate)
>
> "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
> unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic
> terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
> terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what
> they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
> keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)
>
> -
>
> "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor
>
> -
>
> "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode
>
> -
>
> "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>
>
> -
>
> Golden Killfile, June 2005
> KOTM, November 2006
> Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
> Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
> Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
> Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
> Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
> Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
> Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
> AUK Mascot, September 2007
> Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
You never take responsibility for your own comments. Actions that are easily quoted and pointed out. Oh goodness, that is just tons of tripe. For all the gloating Onion Knight has done on this topic, the 'Growth Hacker' does not know how to do this. It only takes a couple seconds to select a selection and 'PDF convert' it.
--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 18:55 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Marx lied. |
| Message-ID | <fotqgjFr46uU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455416 |
OK, I said I would respond to the next few, but: 1) I do not want to wait 2) This way there is no chance you have altered it to fit my ideas better So I snipped all but your bot's comments and the first level quotes... let us see how your bot does: On 6/19/18 5:34 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> i have basic cable. no cnn, sry charlie. >> >> -- >> THIS SPACE FOR RENT >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA >> >> "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this >> seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, >> and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an >> end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell >> everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized >> country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become >> like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) >> >> "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously >> unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic >> terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie >> terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what >> they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by >> keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) >> >> - >> >> "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor >> >> - >> >> "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode >> >> - >> >> "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> >> >> - >> >> Golden Killfile, June 2005 >> KOTM, November 2006 >> Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 >> Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 >> Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 >> Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 >> Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 >> Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 >> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 >> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 >> Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 >> AUK Mascot, September 2007 >> Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 First: it has no comment until the very end of the person's post. Would be MUCH better if it AT LEAST responded to paragraphs. > You never take responsibility for your own comments. This is a generic comment... but I suppose it works well enough. > Actions that are easily quoted and pointed out. This might be tied to the sentence before... if not it at least seems to have a flow. OK, no real "meat" here but it is, after all, a bot. :) > Oh goodness, that is just tons of tripe. Same idea. > For all the gloating Onion Knight has done on this topic, the 'Growth Hacker' does not know how to do this. Why reference someone who has not posted in forever? My AIM bot tracked who it was responding to directly and others it was actively engaged with. Why not do that with yours? Have it find active names. I realize it is not a real time chat, but surely it can look to names it has talked to over the last X number of posts or whatever... people who are still active in the group. > It only takes a couple seconds to select a selection and 'PDF convert' it. I suspect you are trying to get a response from someone about PDF conversions... and given your past trolling over PDFs tweak my nose, too. :) > -- > "You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention" > Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered. You overuse "reverse psychology" and instead of sounding like it is someone else trolling you it sounds like what it is -- you playing victim. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 16:52 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Marx lied. |
| Message-ID | <x2eWC.155617$Mj2.132394@fx22.iad> |
| In reply to | #455353 |
On 6/19/2018 12:11 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 6/19/18 9:04 AM, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder
> Emeritus 🐶笛 wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 08:59:05 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Snit
>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>" determined that the following was of
>> great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
>> <fosniaFkpalU1@mid.individual.net>:
>>> On 6/19/18 8:53 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>> You ("Your Friendly"[sic]) wrote:
>>>>> marx [sic] was a sociologist who predicted the ways that economies
>>>>> evolve
>>>> Karl Marx's predictions were wrong, obviously. The " I know better than
>>>> the market; every detail, always " concept is what's wrong with
>>>> feminists and communists. Four of Karl's kids died in childhood; two
>>>> committed suicide; Frederick Demuth ( a child of rape ? ) was
>>>> abandoned, left in abject povery. Marx lied. If this is what you want,
>>>> follow him. Also, if you _need_ to believe that everything is coming to
>>>> an end; Marxist Jim Jones has some Kool Aid for you, kook.
>>>
>>> Given how it is so rare to see ANYONE back Marx it is hard to understand
>>> why people on the right focus on him so much for ANY reason other than
>>> to try to pull the light off of their own unsupportable views.
>>
>> because marx is so "wrong" they have to ironically whinge about him
>> and try feebly to politicise his scientific and reasoned sociological
>> and economic principles from over 100 years ago, it seems.
>>
>
> What they are trying to do is tie anyone on the left to him, which makes
> no sense at all.
>
Deny, deny, deny! Just as I said. Marx is thoroughly discredited so
while left still believes they try anyway they can to deny they believe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 17:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Marxism didn't work for Marx himself, nor anyone else. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.19--5.36pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #455351 |
You ("Your Friendly"[sic]) keep mentioning:
> [Marx's] scientific and reasoned sociological
> and economic principles
Correlation does not imply causation.
Marxism didn't work for Marx himself, nor anyone else.
Not one of his 8 kids did well.
The " I know better than the market; every detail, always "
concept is what's wrong with feminists and communists.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 20:07 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Marxism didn't work for Marx himself, nor anyone else. |
| Message-ID | <qZydnWAgurh-NbTGnZ2dnUU7-W3NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #455415 |
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 17:36:27 -0700 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD; "Jeff-Relf.Me @." determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.19--5.36pm.Seattle.2018>: -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 16:46 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Marx lied. |
| Message-ID | <0ZdWC.286418$Hv4.283570@fx39.iad> |
| In reply to | #455348 |
On 6/19/2018 11:59 AM, Snit wrote:
> On 6/19/18 8:53 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>> You ("Your Friendly"[sic]) wrote:
>>> marx [sic] was a sociologist who predicted the ways that economies
>>> evolve
>>
>> Karl Marx's predictions were wrong, obviously.
>> The " I know better than the market; every detail, always "
>> concept is what's wrong with feminists and communists.
>>
>> Four of Karl's kids died in childhood; two committed suicide;
>> Frederick Demuth ( a child of rape ? ) was abandoned,
>> left in abject povery. Marx lied.
>>
>> If this is what you want, follow him.
>>
>> Also, if you _need_ to believe that everything is coming to an end;
>> Marxist Jim Jones has some Kool Aid for you, kook.
>>
>
> Given how it is so rare to see ANYONE back Marx it is hard to understand
> why people on the right focus on him so much for ANY reason other than
> to try to pull the light off of their own unsupportable views.
>
Simple. Lefty Libs all still believe in Marx but because his idiotic
ideas have all been ally discredited by experiment, they all try to
cover up their beliefs by re-wording them as many ways as they can think
of and then pretend they aren't Marxism. You know. Like you are doing
right now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 16:03 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Marx lied. |
| Message-ID | <rY2dnfJ4nPcQ8rTGnZ2dnUU7-WXNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #455375 |
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 16:46:50 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "benj
<benj@nobody.net>" determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
<0ZdWC.286418$Hv4.283570@fx39.iad>:
>On 6/19/2018 11:59 AM, Snit wrote:
>>On 6/19/18 8:53 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>You ("Your Friendly"[sic]) wrote:
>>>>marx [sic] was a sociologist who predicted the ways that economies
>>>>evolve
>>>Karl Marx's predictions were wrong, obviously. The " I know better than
>>>the market; every detail, always " concept is what's wrong with
>>>feminists and communists. Four of Karl's kids died in childhood; two
>>>committed suicide; Frederick Demuth ( a child of rape ? ) was
>>>abandoned, left in abject povery. Marx lied. If this is what you
>>>want, follow him. Also, if you _need_ to believe that everything is
>>>coming to an end; Marxist Jim Jones has some Kool Aid for you, kook.
>>Given how it is so rare to see ANYONE back Marx it is hard to understand
>>why people on the right focus on him so much for ANY reason other than
>>to try to pull the light off of their own unsupportable views.
>Simple. Lefty Libs all still believe in Marx but because his idiotic
>ideas have all been ally discredited by experiment, they all try to
>cover up their beliefs by re-wording them as many ways as they can
>think of and then pretend they aren't Marxism. You know. Like you are
>doing right now.
so whatever happened to:
child labor
no weekends off work
18 hour workdays
no employer-backed healthcare for workers
slavery
intentionally dangerous or neglected work conditions
company stores (and their inherent problems)
company housing (and employers meddling in the private lives of it's workers)
???
did workers worldwide fight for more rights, or something?
so, as democracy inches toward more "social" democracy - you think that marx was wrong?
LMAO
he must be VERY VERY wrong for you to be shaking in fear of his ideas over a hundred years later.
--
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA
"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this
seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer,
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell
everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized
country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate)
"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)
-
"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor
-
"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode
-
"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 18:14 -0700 |
| Subject | SuperDeterminism is a better religion. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.19--6.14pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #455379 |
> whatever happened to slavery ? It's alive and well, thank you very much. General Relativity's four dimensional TimeScape is static, eternal, perfectly causal... it is, at once, everything _and_ nothing. All of history, every lesson ever, every advance, tells me: Randomness is ignorance, nothing more. Everyone, from the serial killer to his executer, slave and master, are best viewed under this light (SuperDeterminism), instead of assuming free will, à la Christianity. SuperDeterminism is a better religion; "God" is nature, nothing more, nothing less. We simply prefer the LeastBad "option", and we can't change what we prefer. The only difference between us and "stars/cars/monkeys" is how and what we consume... our nitch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-20 03:21 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: SuperDeterminism is a better religion. |
| Message-ID | <fotvi6FrrctU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455420 |
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:14:26 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> whatever happened to slavery ? > > It's alive and well, thank you very much. > > General Relativity's four dimensional TimeScape is static, eternal, > perfectly causal... it is, at once, everything _and_ nothing. > All of history, every lesson ever, every advance, tells me: > > Randomness is ignorance, nothing more. > > Everyone, from the serial killer to his executer, slave and master, > are best viewed under this light (SuperDeterminism), > instead of assuming free will, à la Christianity. > > SuperDeterminism is a better religion; > "God" is nature, nothing more, nothing less. > > We simply prefer the LeastBad "option", > and we can't change what we prefer. > > The only difference between us and "stars/cars/monkeys" > is how and what we consume... our nitch. It is you, gentle sir, who is "appealing to the Pope" with your "religion". (And indeed, that is exactly what you posit.) Quote: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ The implications of superdeterminism, if it is true, would bring into question the value of science itself by destroying falsifiability, as Anton Zeilinger has commented: [W]e always implicitly assume the freedom of the experimentalist... This fundamental assumption is essential to doing science. If this were not true, then, I suggest, it would make no sense at all to ask nature questions in an experiment, since then nature could determine what our questions are, and that could guide our questions such that we arrive at a false picture of nature.[5] _ _ _ _ _ _ _ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superdeterminism 5. A. Zeilinger, Dance of the Photons, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2010, p. 266. Abner Shimony, Michael Horne and John Clauser made a similar comment in replying to John Bell in their discussions in the Epistemological Letters: "In any scientific experiment in which two or more variables are supposed to be randomly selected, one can always conjecture that some factor in the overlap of the backward light cones has controlled the presumably random choices. But, we maintain, skepticism of this sort will essentially dismiss all results of scientific experimentation. Unless we proceed under the assumption that hidden conspiracies of this sort do not occur, we have abandoned in advance the whole enterprise of discovering the laws of nature by experimentation." (Shimony A, Horne M A and Clauser J F, "Comment on the theory of local beables", Epistemological Letters, 13 1 (1976), as quoted in Jan-Åke Larsson, "Loopholes in Bell inequality tests of local realism", J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47 (2014)) -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 23:35 -0700 |
| Subject | Does "Bell's Inequality" require perfect knowledge ? |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.19--11.35pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #455434 |
Quoting Anton Zeilinger ( modified by me, for clarity ): We implicitly assume " the freedom of the experimentalist " [ a.k.a. " the uncaused cause " ]... otherwise, nature determines what our questions are, obscuring our view. Yeah, our vision isn't perfect... so what ? Does "Bell's Inequality" require perfect knowledge ? Perfection was never the goal; instead, we prefer the LeastBad "option", and we can't change what we prefer. We're " natural robots ", programmed by nature to exploit our nitch, to consume, like the sun, or a car. At the start, there was no entropy, just infinite eXergy/density. [ eXergy is a type of energy that can do physical work, force * distance ] And, because " Time == Entropy ", there was no time on the clock then. Eventually, this eXergy will be consumed away, replaced with entropy; leaving us with a uniform heat bath that has all of the energy but none of the eXergy. Gravity is residual exergy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-20 12:17 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Does "Bell's Inequality" require perfect knowledge ? |
| Message-ID | <q6vWC.463586$nq5.450359@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #455461 |
On 6/20/2018 2:35 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Quoting Anton Zeilinger ( modified by me, for clarity ): > > We implicitly assume " the freedom of the experimentalist " > [ a.k.a. " the uncaused cause " ]... otherwise, > nature determines what our questions are, obscuring our view. > > Yeah, our vision isn't perfect... so what ? > Does "Bell's Inequality" require perfect knowledge ? > > Perfection was never the goal; > instead, we prefer the LeastBad "option", > and we can't change what we prefer. > > We're " natural robots ", programmed by nature > to exploit our nitch, to consume, like the sun, or a car. > > At the start, there was no entropy, just infinite eXergy/density. > [ eXergy is a type of energy that can do physical work, force * distance ] > And, because " Time == Entropy ", there was no time on the clock then. > > Eventually, this eXergy will be consumed away, replaced with entropy; > leaving us with a uniform heat bath that has all of the energy > but none of the eXergy. Gravity is residual exergy. > Rolf this is the biggest fucking fantasy I've ever heard! NONE of it agrees with reality. You are STILL an idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-20 12:14 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: SuperDeterminism is a better religion. |
| Message-ID | <t3vWC.463585$nq5.88847@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #455420 |
On 6/19/2018 9:14 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> whatever happened to slavery ? > > It's alive and well, thank you very much. > > General Relativity's four dimensional TimeScape is static, eternal, > perfectly causal... it is, at once, everything _and_ nothing. > All of history, every lesson ever, every advance, tells me: Rolf you moron I've already pointed out that the GR Spacetime is NOT static at all. That makes your theory WRONG. No three Nobels for you. You are STILL an idiot. <raps knuckles on Rolf's forehead> Are you listening to me?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-21 04:04 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: SuperDeterminism is a better religion. |
| Message-ID | <1bb01cbd-9cfd-464d-9dc7-4477e795e308@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455485 |
On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 9:14:20 AM UTC-7, benj wrote: > On 6/19/2018 9:14 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > >> whatever happened to slavery ? > > > > It's alive and well, thank you very much. > > > > General Relativity's four dimensional TimeScape is static, eternal, > > perfectly causal... it is, at once, everything _and_ nothing. > > All of history, every lesson ever, every advance, tells me: > > Rolf you moron I've already pointed out that the GR > Spacetime is NOT static at all. That makes your theory WRONG. > No three Nobels for you. > > You are STILL an idiot. > > <raps knuckles on Rolf's forehead> > Are you listening to me? So why the requirement to time a script via an automated phone system in an embedded system? Predictably, he didn't define this as part of his unsurprisingly never ending expansion of 'specification' <eyeroll>. I think the point is more than to get people to listen to him. The point is likely to piss Steven Carroll off for flooding outside groups he knows I frequent. It was Sigmond who flooded Steven Carroll's site millions of times and pretended he did not do it. Gee, imagine Sigmond trying to pin his trash on Steven Carroll, no one has ever seen that before. The Mack has more streamlined workflows. Meanwhile Linux has no tasks it handles better. -- This broke the Internet! https://youtu.be/Z5wo5aE7MUk https://redd.it/6sfhq6 https://youtu.be/D_so1dvjeyI Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 14:15 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Marx lied. |
| Message-ID | <fota3jFoatfU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455375 |
On 6/19/18 1:46 PM, benj wrote:
> On 6/19/2018 11:59 AM, Snit wrote:
>> On 6/19/18 8:53 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>> You ("Your Friendly"[sic]) wrote:
>>>> marx [sic] was a sociologist who predicted the ways that economies
>>>> evolve
>>>
>>> Karl Marx's predictions were wrong, obviously.
>>> The " I know better than the market; every detail, always "
>>> concept is what's wrong with feminists and communists.
>>>
>>> Four of Karl's kids died in childhood; two committed suicide;
>>> Frederick Demuth ( a child of rape ? ) was abandoned,
>>> left in abject povery. Marx lied.
>>>
>>> If this is what you want, follow him.
>>>
>>> Also, if you _need_ to believe that everything is coming to an end;
>>> Marxist Jim Jones has some Kool Aid for you, kook.
>>>
>>
>> Given how it is so rare to see ANYONE back Marx it is hard to
>> understand why people on the right focus on him so much for ANY reason
>> other than to try to pull the light off of their own unsupportable views.
>>
> Simple. Lefty Libs all still believe in Marx but because his idiotic
> ideas have all been ally discredited by experiment, they all try to
> cover up their beliefs by re-wording them as many ways as they can think
> of and then pretend they aren't Marxism. You know. Like you are doing
> right now.
Who brought up Marx? Not I.
Why not spend time supporting your own ideas and not lying about the
ideas of others?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 18:17 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Marx lied. |
| Message-ID | <RhfWC.95787$Kp4.67851@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #455385 |
On 6/19/2018 5:15 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 6/19/18 1:46 PM, benj wrote:
>> On 6/19/2018 11:59 AM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 6/19/18 8:53 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>> You ("Your Friendly"[sic]) wrote:
>>>>> marx [sic] was a sociologist who predicted the ways that economies
>>>>> evolve
>>>>
>>>> Karl Marx's predictions were wrong, obviously.
>>>> The " I know better than the market; every detail, always "
>>>> concept is what's wrong with feminists and communists.
>>>>
>>>> Four of Karl's kids died in childhood; two committed suicide;
>>>> Frederick Demuth ( a child of rape ? ) was abandoned,
>>>> left in abject povery. Marx lied.
>>>>
>>>> If this is what you want, follow him.
>>>>
>>>> Also, if you _need_ to believe that everything is coming to an end;
>>>> Marxist Jim Jones has some Kool Aid for you, kook.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Given how it is so rare to see ANYONE back Marx it is hard to
>>> understand why people on the right focus on him so much for ANY
>>> reason other than to try to pull the light off of their own
>>> unsupportable views.
>>>
>> Simple. Lefty Libs all still believe in Marx but because his idiotic
>> ideas have all been ally discredited by experiment, they all try to
>> cover up their beliefs by re-wording them as many ways as they can
>> think of and then pretend they aren't Marxism. You know. Like you are
>> doing right now.
>
> Who brought up Marx? Not I.
>
> Why not spend time supporting your own ideas and not lying about the
> ideas of others?
>
Because dear liberal, your fantasies are not reality. Even MY fantasies
are not reality. Reality is important. That's why we try to discuss it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 15:29 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Marx lied. |
| Message-ID | <fotee4Fp58fU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455392 |
On 6/19/18 3:17 PM, benj wrote:
> On 6/19/2018 5:15 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 6/19/18 1:46 PM, benj wrote:
>>> On 6/19/2018 11:59 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>> On 6/19/18 8:53 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>>> You ("Your Friendly"[sic]) wrote:
>>>>>> marx [sic] was a sociologist who predicted the ways that economies
>>>>>> evolve
>>>>>
>>>>> Karl Marx's predictions were wrong, obviously.
>>>>> The " I know better than the market; every detail, always "
>>>>> concept is what's wrong with feminists and communists.
>>>>>
>>>>> Four of Karl's kids died in childhood; two committed suicide;
>>>>> Frederick Demuth ( a child of rape ? ) was abandoned,
>>>>> left in abject povery. Marx lied.
>>>>>
>>>>> If this is what you want, follow him.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, if you _need_ to believe that everything is coming to an end;
>>>>> Marxist Jim Jones has some Kool Aid for you, kook.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Given how it is so rare to see ANYONE back Marx it is hard to
>>>> understand why people on the right focus on him so much for ANY
>>>> reason other than to try to pull the light off of their own
>>>> unsupportable views.
>>>>
>>> Simple. Lefty Libs all still believe in Marx but because his idiotic
>>> ideas have all been ally discredited by experiment, they all try to
>>> cover up their beliefs by re-wording them as many ways as they can
>>> think of and then pretend they aren't Marxism. You know. Like you are
>>> doing right now.
>>
>> Who brought up Marx? Not I.
>>
>> Why not spend time supporting your own ideas and not lying about the
>> ideas of others?
>>
> Because dear liberal, your fantasies are not reality. Even MY fantasies
> are not reality. Reality is important. That's why we try to discuss it.
That is not an excuse for you to make up stories about the views of others.
Let me be clear: I do not support the ideas you claim I do.
Got it?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 15:43 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Marx lied. |
| Message-ID | <3714bba7-182b-4eb1-836a-5cb2fd335679@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455395 |
On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 3:29:27 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 6/19/18 3:17 PM, benj wrote:
> > On 6/19/2018 5:15 PM, Snit wrote:
> >> On 6/19/18 1:46 PM, benj wrote:
> >>> On 6/19/2018 11:59 AM, Snit wrote:
> >>>> On 6/19/18 8:53 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> >>>>> You ("Your Friendly"[sic]) wrote:
> >>>>>> marx [sic] was a sociologist who predicted the ways that economies
> >>>>>> evolve
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Karl Marx's predictions were wrong, obviously.
> >>>>> The " I know better than the market; every detail, always "
> >>>>> concept is what's wrong with feminists and communists.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Four of Karl's kids died in childhood; two committed suicide;
> >>>>> Frederick Demuth ( a child of rape ? ) was abandoned,
> >>>>> left in abject povery. Marx lied.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If this is what you want, follow him.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Also, if you _need_ to believe that everything is coming to an end;
> >>>>> Marxist Jim Jones has some Kool Aid for you, kook.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Given how it is so rare to see ANYONE back Marx it is hard to
> >>>> understand why people on the right focus on him so much for ANY
> >>>> reason other than to try to pull the light off of their own
> >>>> unsupportable views.
> >>>>
> >>> Simple. Lefty Libs all still believe in Marx but because his idiotic
> >>> ideas have all been ally discredited by experiment, they all try to
> >>> cover up their beliefs by re-wording them as many ways as they can
> >>> think of and then pretend they aren't Marxism. You know. Like you are
> >>> doing right now.
> >>
> >> Who brought up Marx? Not I.
> >>
> >> Why not spend time supporting your own ideas and not lying about the
> >> ideas of others?
> >>
> > Because dear liberal, your fantasies are not reality. Even MY fantasies
> > are not reality. Reality is important. That's why we try to discuss it.
>
> That is not an excuse for you to make up stories about the views of others.
>
> Let me be clear: I do not support the ideas you claim I do.
>
> Got it?
>
> --
> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
>
> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
>
> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
Currently there are too many "it just works" Linux users and not enough users with the skills to help the people with psychological problems. You likely think Mint handles the desktop well. Nope. Not compared to anything else, really. Rambling cretin. His dream is to see me annoyed by nonstop flooding. And hey, that could or could not... you know what I mean.
--
This Trick Gets Women Hot For You!!
https://youtu.be/VxLiH-x0aeY
http://prescottcomputerguy.com
Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 19:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Marx lied. |
| Message-ID | <fotriiFr9f2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455398 |
On 6/19/18 3:43 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 3:29:27 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
>> On 6/19/18 3:17 PM, benj wrote:
>>> On 6/19/2018 5:15 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>> On 6/19/18 1:46 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>> On 6/19/2018 11:59 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/19/18 8:53 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>>>>> You ("Your Friendly"[sic]) wrote:
>>>>>>>> marx [sic] was a sociologist who predicted the ways that economies
>>>>>>>> evolve
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Karl Marx's predictions were wrong, obviously.
>>>>>>> The " I know better than the market; every detail, always "
>>>>>>> concept is what's wrong with feminists and communists.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Four of Karl's kids died in childhood; two committed suicide;
>>>>>>> Frederick Demuth ( a child of rape ? ) was abandoned,
>>>>>>> left in abject povery. Marx lied.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If this is what you want, follow him.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, if you _need_ to believe that everything is coming to an end;
>>>>>>> Marxist Jim Jones has some Kool Aid for you, kook.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Given how it is so rare to see ANYONE back Marx it is hard to
>>>>>> understand why people on the right focus on him so much for ANY
>>>>>> reason other than to try to pull the light off of their own
>>>>>> unsupportable views.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Simple. Lefty Libs all still believe in Marx but because his idiotic
>>>>> ideas have all been ally discredited by experiment, they all try to
>>>>> cover up their beliefs by re-wording them as many ways as they can
>>>>> think of and then pretend they aren't Marxism. You know. Like you are
>>>>> doing right now.
>>>>
>>>> Who brought up Marx? Not I.
>>>>
>>>> Why not spend time supporting your own ideas and not lying about the
>>>> ideas of others?
>>>>
>>> Because dear liberal, your fantasies are not reality. Even MY fantasies
>>> are not reality. Reality is important. That's why we try to discuss it.
>>
>> That is not an excuse for you to make up stories about the views of others.
>>
>> Let me be clear: I do not support the ideas you claim I do.
>>
>> Got it?
>>
>> --
>> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
>> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
>> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
>>
>> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
>>
>> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
OK, one last one:
> Currently there are too many "it just works" Linux users and not enough users with the skills to help the people with psychological problems.
OK, for COLA you are pulling in Linux and your obsession with my
degree... but other than the sentence sounding like your "Mad Lib" view
it is not bad. Instead of "psychological problems" you likely should
stick to "not enough experience" or whatever.
> You likely think Mint handles the desktop well. Nope. Not compared to anything else, really.
Again, pulling in Linux users. OK.
> Rambling cretin. His dream is to see me annoyed by nonstop flooding. And hey, that could or could not... you know what I mean.
More COLA insults... makes as much sense as many.
> --
> This Trick Gets Women Hot For You!!
Again I do not get your .sig. Makes no sense to me.
> https://youtu.be/VxLiH-x0aeY
> http://prescottcomputerguy.com
> Jonas Eklundh Communication
More focus on Sandman and myself. WHY? Other than Google seeding I do
not see the value of this... and it looks VERY bot-like. I would kill
that if I were you.
Anyway, that should give you some idea of what I have been talking about:
* Respond to sentences... not just after the full content
* Try to use names that are active in the group
* Have topics refer to the text in the post you respond to. Sure, you
will not do so like a human but what you do is pretty bad.
* Your .sig is just meaningless. Why have it do what it does?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 11:00 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Marx lied. |
| Message-ID | <BpqdnY5di580tbTGnZ2dnUU7-RHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #455346 |
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 08:53:38 -0700 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD;
"Jeff-Relf.Me @." determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
<Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.19--8.53am.Seattle.2018>:
>You ("Your Friendly"[sic]) wrote:
>>marx [sic] was a sociologist who predicted the ways that economies
>>evolve
>
>Karl Marx's predictions were wrong, obviously. The " I know better than
>the market; every detail, always " concept is what's wrong with
>feminists and communists.
>
>Four of Karl's kids died in childhood; two committed suicide; Frederick
>Demuth ( a child of rape ? ) was abandoned, left in abject povery.
>Marx lied.
>
>If this is what you want, follow him.
>
>Also, if you _need_ to believe that everything is coming to an end;
>Marxist Jim Jones has some Kool Aid for you, kook.
if his predictions are "wrong" as you say, then you have absolutely nothing to worry about. no more "red scare". problem solved.
right?
--
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA
"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this
seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer,
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell
everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized
country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate)
"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)
-
"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor
-
"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode
-
"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 17:28 -0700 |
| Subject | Not one of Karl Marx's 8 kids did well. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.19--5.28pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #455350 |
You ("Your Friendly"[sic]) replied ( to me ):
> > Karl Marx's predictions were wrong, obviously.
> > The " I know better than the market; every detail, always "
> > concept is what's wrong with feminists and communists.
>
> if his predictions are "wrong" as you say,
> then you have absolutely nothing to worry about.
Nevermind me, I worry about "you" ( the mainstream ).
Not one of Karl Marx's 8 kids did well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web