Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #454786 > unrolled thread

Snit vsThe Retard.

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Snit vsThe Retard. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 02:08 +0000
    Re: Snit vsThe Retard. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 19:35 -0700

#454786 — Snit vsThe Retard.

Another snit trait that mimics retards is the ability to dwell on simple 
differences that normal people just adapt to and move on.

So, something most people don't realize is that major software 
manufacturers hire mentally challenged people to perform simple scripted 
tasks within the UI of the software program that is being developed.
Why?
Because the retard will focus on the inconsequential every time.

So for example, let's say within a single software program that in some 
dialog boxes the choice to leave is labeled "Exit" but in other parts of 
the same program it's labeled "Quit".

A person of normal intelligence will subconsciously equate the two and be 
able to exit the program or module of the program.

A retard OTOH will be flummoxed by this and won't be able to equate the 
exit with quit and will thus fail the test.
It comes down to the way the retard processes data compared to a normal 
person.

So snit, fits into the retard category, by a long shot.
He is always making noise about seemingly minor to everyone else details 
and differences in programs.

 Wear your badge with honor snit!

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#454793

On 6/10/18 7:08 PM, simon singh wrote:
> So for example, let's say within a single software program that in some
> dialog boxes the choice to leave is labeled "Exit" but in other parts of
> the same program it's labeled "Quit".
> 
> A person of normal intelligence will subconsciously equate the two and be
> able to exit the program or module of the program.

Peter failed that test. :)

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web