Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #454786

Snit vsThe Retard.

From simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy, talk.politics.guns
Subject Snit vsThe Retard.
Date 2018-06-11 02:08 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <pfklit$pv3$3@dont-email.me> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Another snit trait that mimics retards is the ability to dwell on simple 
differences that normal people just adapt to and move on.

So, something most people don't realize is that major software 
manufacturers hire mentally challenged people to perform simple scripted 
tasks within the UI of the software program that is being developed.
Why?
Because the retard will focus on the inconsequential every time.

So for example, let's say within a single software program that in some 
dialog boxes the choice to leave is labeled "Exit" but in other parts of 
the same program it's labeled "Quit".

A person of normal intelligence will subconsciously equate the two and be 
able to exit the program or module of the program.

A retard OTOH will be flummoxed by this and won't be able to equate the 
exit with quit and will thus fail the test.
It comes down to the way the retard processes data compared to a normal 
person.

So snit, fits into the retard category, by a long shot.
He is always making noise about seemingly minor to everyone else details 
and differences in programs.

 Wear your badge with honor snit!

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Snit vsThe Retard. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 02:08 +0000
  Re: Snit vsThe Retard. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 19:35 -0700

csiph-web