Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366134 > unrolled thread

If you see a liberal

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-20 22:17 +0000
    Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 16:56 -0700
      Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 00:18 +0000
        Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 17:27 -0700
          Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 00:49 +0000
            Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 18:38 -0700
              Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 01:51 +0000
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 19:44 -0700
                  Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 03:08 +0000
                    Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 20:15 -0700
                      Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 03:34 +0000
                        Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 21:02 -0700
                          Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 04:22 +0000
                            Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 22:14 -0700
                              Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 05:21 +0000
                                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 22:50 -0700
                                  Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 06:00 +0000
                                    Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 23:16 -0700
                                      Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 06:35 +0000
                                        Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 10:01 -0700
                                  Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 07:58 -0400
                                    Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:19 -0700
              Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 07:54 -0400
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:16 -0700
            Re: If you see a liberal DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 01:07 -0400
              Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 05:15 +0000
                Re: If you see a liberal DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 09:35 -0400
                  Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 15:13 +0000
                  Re: If you see a liberal Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-21 12:22 -0400
                    Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-21 11:06 -0600
                    Re: If you see a liberal DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 18:38 -0400
                      Re: If you see a liberal Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-21 19:08 -0400
                        Re: If you see a liberal chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-22 06:59 -0500
                          So, now you are an outhouse attendent? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-22 12:23 -0600
          Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-21 11:04 -0600
            Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 10:08 -0700
              Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 18:42 +0000
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 12:25 -0700
                Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-22 12:25 -0600
                  Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 11:39 -0700
                    Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 11:53 -0600
                      Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:07 -0700
                        Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:54 -0600
                          Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:40 -0700
                  Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 08:36 -0400
                    Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:24 -0700
              Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-22 12:24 -0600
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 11:26 -0700
                  Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 11:55 -0600
                    Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:05 -0700
                      Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:54 -0600
                        Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:38 -0700
                    Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:09 -0400
                      Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:25 -0700
                      Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 14:09 -0600
                        Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:20 -0700
          Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 07:52 -0400
            Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:15 -0700
    Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-21 11:03 -0600
    Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 07:49 -0400
      Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 15:54 +0000
      Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:19 -0700
        Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 17:33 +0000
          Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:39 -0700
            Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 17:46 +0000
              Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:01 -0700
              Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:41 -0400
                Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:51 -0700
                Re: If you see a liberal Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 12:22 -0700
                  Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 16:00 -0400
                    Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:04 -0700
          Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:39 -0400
            Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 18:54 +0000

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

#366633

On 2016-08-21 1:50 AM, Snit wrote:
> On 8/20/16, 10:21 PM, in article fhjcis983.ajfu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>
> ...
>>>> I don't shun the rule of law.
>>>
>>> Look at the start of the thread. You threw law and morality away to not only
>>> wish death on people but to call on others to engage in violence based on a
>>> video you saw depicting a small number of people acting poorly.
>>
>> You libtard monkeys act like that everywhere you go.
>
> See: from you we get name calling and attacks against whole groups of people
> based on the action of a very few. Reminds me of how many in the US attack
> all Muslims. A tiny, tiny fraction act poorly so ALL are deemed bad. Same
> with other groups: Christians, blacks, whites, atheists, etc.
>
> It is reprehensible and AGAINST the rule of law and basic morality.

Statistics don't support your statement. Muslims in the United States 
and Europe were polled not too long ago to determine to what extent they 
support terrorism, Sharia and the Islamic State. Regardless of whether 
they themselves committed any kind of terrorism, the reality is that a 
_significant_ amount of them support all three of the above. They truly 
do see the West as a problem and want to see it replaced by the 
Middle-Aged bullshit they follow in their own countries. Shia Muslims 
are a lot more receptive to the West, but Sunnis are overwhelmingly 
against it and should not be allowed anywhere near North America or Europe.

< snip >

-- 
Silver Slimer
Linux is the technological equivalent of a Chrysler; it looks nice 
enough but catches fire once you use it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366701

On 8/25/16, 4:58 AM, in article npmmhq$cvg$3@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:

> On 2016-08-21 1:50 AM, Snit wrote:
>> On 8/20/16, 10:21 PM, in article fhjcis983.ajfu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>> ...
>>>>> I don't shun the rule of law.
>>>> 
>>>> Look at the start of the thread. You threw law and morality away to not
>>>> only
>>>> wish death on people but to call on others to engage in violence based on a
>>>> video you saw depicting a small number of people acting poorly.
>>> 
>>> You libtard monkeys act like that everywhere you go.
>> 
>> See: from you we get name calling and attacks against whole groups of people
>> based on the action of a very few. Reminds me of how many in the US attack
>> all Muslims. A tiny, tiny fraction act poorly so ALL are deemed bad. Same
>> with other groups: Christians, blacks, whites, atheists, etc.
>> 
>> It is reprehensible and AGAINST the rule of law and basic morality.
> 
> Statistics don't support your statement. Muslims in the United States
> and Europe were polled not too long ago to determine to what extent they
> support terrorism, Sharia and the Islamic State. Regardless of whether
> they themselves committed any kind of terrorism, the reality is that a
> _significant_ amount of them support all three of the above.

I have read such stats and talked about them in the past. I find them
troubling. I also find it troubling how Christians in the US support lesser
rights for atheists, the attacks against Muslim nations, and other rather
abhorrent things! Even then, the Christian extremism is less so than what is
shown in polls about Muslims. I do not deny that. But to generalize these
things to all Christians or all Muslims is wrong.

> They truly do see the West as a problem and want to see it replaced by the
> Middle-Aged bullshit they follow in their own countries. Shia Muslims are a
> lot more receptive to the West, but Sunnis are overwhelmingly against it and
> should not be allowed anywhere near North America or Europe.

People should be judged for who they are, not if they are Christian or
Muslim or Sunni or Shia or Catholic or Morman.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366632

On 2016-08-20 9:38 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 8/20/16, 5:49 PM, in article fhjvbdmafjd873.ajif8@perch.invalid,
> "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 8/20/16, 5:18 PM, in article hjgua030ga4.gary77@perch.invalid, "Octavian
>>> W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 8/20/16, 3:17 PM, in article ghjadiw93r.age@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> If you see a liberal, kill it.
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424
>>>>>>
>>>>> Not surprised you advocate violence.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Did you watch the video?
>>>>
>>> Yes. Still not surprising to see you advocate violence, nor to see you take
>>> such an illogical stance against such a large group of people.
>>
>> Not surprising you having nothing to say about the actual documented
>> liberal violence in that video.
>
> I do not back it in any way... but I am commenting on your irrational
> stretching of that poor behavior by a few to a whole group.
>
>> Liberals are a plague on humanity, and they will pay a heavy price when the
>> lights go out.  Even now, the only thing keeping humans from completely
>> annihilating liberals is the rule of law.  When that is gone, bye bye violent
>> snowflakes. Your Gay Fuckes masks will not protect you.
>
> You advocate the LACK of the rule of law as you pretend to support it. You
> advocate violence and anger, not law and peace.

Much like every other liberal on the planet, rather than commenting on 
the actual content of the video, you decided to focus on the comment he 
made in sharing it. In other words, like Hillary and the establishment 
protecting her, when you can't dismiss the crime committed, you'll try 
to discredit the source.

-- 
Silver Slimer
Linux is the technological equivalent of a Chrysler; it looks nice 
enough but catches fire once you use it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366700

On 8/25/16, 4:54 AM, in article npmm8q$cvg$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:

> On 2016-08-20 9:38 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 8/20/16, 5:49 PM, in article fhjvbdmafjd873.ajif8@perch.invalid,
>> "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> On 8/20/16, 5:18 PM, in article hjgua030ga4.gary77@perch.invalid, "Octavian
>>>> W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/20/16, 3:17 PM, in article ghjadiw93r.age@perch.invalid, "Octavian
>>>>>> W.
>>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If you see a liberal, kill it.
>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Not surprised you advocate violence.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Did you watch the video?
>>>>> 
>>>> Yes. Still not surprising to see you advocate violence, nor to see you take
>>>> such an illogical stance against such a large group of people.
>>> 
>>> Not surprising you having nothing to say about the actual documented
>>> liberal violence in that video.
>> 
>> I do not back it in any way... but I am commenting on your irrational
>> stretching of that poor behavior by a few to a whole group.
>> 
>>> Liberals are a plague on humanity, and they will pay a heavy price when the
>>> lights go out.  Even now, the only thing keeping humans from completely
>>> annihilating liberals is the rule of law.  When that is gone, bye bye
>>> violent
>>> snowflakes. Your Gay Fuckes masks will not protect you.
>> 
>> You advocate the LACK of the rule of law as you pretend to support it. You
>> advocate violence and anger, not law and peace.
> 
> Much like every other liberal on the planet, rather than commenting on
> the actual content of the video, you decided to focus on the comment he
> made in sharing it.

I do not agree with the actions in the video... but the bigger issue is
Owl's extreme bigotry as he pisses on the rule of law as he pretends to
support it.

> In other words, like Hillary and the establishment
> protecting her, when you can't dismiss the crime committed, you'll try
> to discredit the source.

I do not in any way defend the actions in the video... or support them.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366152

On 8/20/2016 8:49 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 8/20/16, 5:18 PM, in article hjgua030ga4.gary77@perch.invalid, "Octavian
>> W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> On 8/20/16, 3:17 PM, in article ghjadiw93r.age@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If you see a liberal, kill it.
>>>>> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424
>>>>>
>>>> Not surprised you advocate violence.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Did you watch the video?
>>>
>> Yes. Still not surprising to see you advocate violence, nor to see you take
>> such an illogical stance against such a large group of people.
>>
>
> Not surprising you having nothing to say about the actual documented
> liberal violence in that video.  Liberals are a plague on humanity,
> and they will pay a heavy price when the lights go out.  Even now,
> the only thing keeping humans from completely annihilating liberals
> is the rule of law.  When that is gone, bye bye violent snowflakes.
> Your Gay Fuckes masks will not protect you.


A 2-beer night, eh?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366155

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 8/20/2016 8:49 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 8/20/16, 5:18 PM, in article hjgua030ga4.gary77@perch.invalid, "Octavian
>>> W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 8/20/16, 3:17 PM, in article ghjadiw93r.age@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> If you see a liberal, kill it.
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424
>>>>>>
>>>>> Not surprised you advocate violence.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Did you watch the video?
>>>>
>>> Yes. Still not surprising to see you advocate violence, nor to see you take
>>> such an illogical stance against such a large group of people.
>>>
>>
>> Not surprising you having nothing to say about the actual documented
>> liberal violence in that video.  Liberals are a plague on humanity,
>> and they will pay a heavy price when the lights go out.  Even now,
>> the only thing keeping humans from completely annihilating liberals
>> is the rule of law.  When that is gone, bye bye violent snowflakes.
>> Your Gay Fuckes masks will not protect you.
> 
> 
> A 2-beer night, eh?
> 

I don't drink.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtCVLtcfLi4 
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366165

On 8/21/2016 1:15 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> On 8/20/2016 8:49 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> On 8/20/16, 5:18 PM, in article hjgua030ga4.gary77@perch.invalid, "Octavian
>>>> W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/20/16, 3:17 PM, in article ghjadiw93r.age@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you see a liberal, kill it.
>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not surprised you advocate violence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you watch the video?
>>>>>
>>>> Yes. Still not surprising to see you advocate violence, nor to see you take
>>>> such an illogical stance against such a large group of people.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not surprising you having nothing to say about the actual documented
>>> liberal violence in that video.  Liberals are a plague on humanity,
>>> and they will pay a heavy price when the lights go out.  Even now,
>>> the only thing keeping humans from completely annihilating liberals
>>> is the rule of law.  When that is gone, bye bye violent snowflakes.
>>> Your Gay Fuckes masks will not protect you.
>>
>>
>> A 2-beer night, eh?
>>
>
> I don't drink.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtCVLtcfLi4


A different kind of liquid courage, then.  You sprayed on some 'Empire 
By Trump'.

https://www.amazon.com/Empire-Donald-Trump-Toilette-Spray/dp/B013UKO2SC

Note: "it makes you smell 'young and successful'".  You could use some 
of both...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366173

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 8/21/2016 1:15 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> On 8/20/2016 8:49 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 8/20/16, 5:18 PM, in article hjgua030ga4.gary77@perch.invalid, "Octavian
>>>>> W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/20/16, 3:17 PM, in article ghjadiw93r.age@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you see a liberal, kill it.
>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not surprised you advocate violence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you watch the video?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. Still not surprising to see you advocate violence, nor to see you take
>>>>> such an illogical stance against such a large group of people.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not surprising you having nothing to say about the actual documented
>>>> liberal violence in that video.  Liberals are a plague on humanity,
>>>> and they will pay a heavy price when the lights go out.  Even now,
>>>> the only thing keeping humans from completely annihilating liberals
>>>> is the rule of law.  When that is gone, bye bye violent snowflakes.
>>>> Your Gay Fuckes masks will not protect you.
>>>
>>>
>>> A 2-beer night, eh?
>>>
>>
>> I don't drink.
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtCVLtcfLi4
> 
> 
> A different kind of liquid courage, then.  You sprayed on some 'Empire 
> By Trump'.
> 
> https://www.amazon.com/Empire-Donald-Trump-Toilette-Spray/dp/B013UKO2SC
> 
> Note: "it makes you smell 'young and successful'".  You could use some 
> of both...
> 

I didn't realize Hillary had one too.
http://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0028/6332/products/C97330-HI-11_large.jpg?v=1333114651
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366176

DFS wrote:

> A different kind of liquid courage, then.  You sprayed on some 'Empire 
> By Trump'.
> 
> https://www.amazon.com/Empire-Donald-Trump-Toilette-Spray/dp/B013UKO2SC
> 
> Note: "it makes you smell 'young and successful'".  You could use some 
> of both...

I bought some KISS cologne once. (Hey, it was a LONG time ago). It had so
much cumin in it that it smelled like a burrito platter.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366184

On 08/21/16 10:22, Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> DFS wrote:
>
>> A different kind of liquid courage, then.  You sprayed on some 'Empire
>> By Trump'.
>>
>> https://www.amazon.com/Empire-Donald-Trump-Toilette-Spray/dp/B013UKO2SC
>>
>> Note: "it makes you smell 'young and successful'".  You could use some
>> of both...
>
> I bought some KISS cologne once. (Hey, it was a LONG time ago). It had so
> much cumin in it that it smelled like a burrito platter.

ROFLMAO!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366207

On 8/21/2016 12:22 PM, Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> DFS wrote:
>
>> A different kind of liquid courage, then.  You sprayed on some 'Empire
>> By Trump'.
>>
>> https://www.amazon.com/Empire-Donald-Trump-Toilette-Spray/dp/B013UKO2SC
>>
>> Note: "it makes you smell 'young and successful'".  You could use some
>> of both...
>
> I bought some KISS cologne once. (Hey, it was a LONG time ago). It had so
> much cumin in it that it smelled like a burrito platter.

ha!

https://www.walmart.com/ip/Kiss-Him-By-Kiss-Cologne-Spray-3.-4-Oz/25519725

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366211

DFS wrote:

> ha!
> 
> https://www.walmart.com/ip/Kiss-Him-By-Kiss-Cologne-Spray-3.-4-Oz/25519725

Wow, they still make it? Amazing.

<quote>
 Black Cumin, White Pepper...
</quote>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366237

Tattoo Vampire wrote:

> Dumfsck wrote:
>>
>> ha!
>> 
>> https://www.walmart.com/ip/Kiss-Him-By-Kiss-Cologne-Spray-3.-4-Oz/25519725
>
>Wow, they still make it? Amazing.

Dumfsck uses that chemical that they use in outhouses, to keep the
stench down.

-- 
"GPLed software is free but with numerous strings attached making it
only partially free in practice. Compared to licenses where free
really is free, what's so great about that?"  -  "Black Dragon"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366278 — So, now you are an outhouse attendent?

On 08/22/16 05:59, chrisv wrote:
> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>
>> Dumfsck wrote:
>>>
>>> ha!
>>>
>>> https://www.walmart.com/ip/Kiss-Him-By-Kiss-Cologne-Spray-3.-4-Oz/25519725
>>
>> Wow, they still make it? Amazing.
>
> Dumfsck uses that chemical that they use in outhouses, to keep the
> stench down.
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366182

On 08/20/16 18:27, Snit wrote:
> On 8/20/16, 5:18 PM, in article hjgua030ga4.gary77@perch.invalid, "Octavian
> W. Lagrange"<olagrang@perch.invalid>  wrote:
>
>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>  wrote:
>>> On 8/20/16, 3:17 PM, in article ghjadiw93r.age@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>> Lagrange"<olagrang@perch.invalid>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> If you see a liberal, kill it.
>>>> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424
>>>>
>>> Not surprised you advocate violence.
>>>
>>
>> Did you watch the video?
>>
> Yes. Still not surprising to see you advocate violence, nor to see you take
> such an illogical stance against such a large group of people.
>
>
I'd say that the liberals are the ones going ballistic.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366186

On 8/21/16, 10:04 AM, in article npcmuj$ipb$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
<mist@cumulus.com> wrote:

> On 08/20/16 18:27, Snit wrote:
>> On 8/20/16, 5:18 PM, in article hjgua030ga4.gary77@perch.invalid, "Octavian
>> W. Lagrange"<olagrang@perch.invalid>  wrote:
>> 
>>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>  wrote:
>>>> On 8/20/16, 3:17 PM, in article ghjadiw93r.age@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>>> Lagrange"<olagrang@perch.invalid>  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> If you see a liberal, kill it.
>>>>> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424
>>>>> 
>>>> Not surprised you advocate violence.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Did you watch the video?
>>> 
>> Yes. Still not surprising to see you advocate violence, nor to see you take
>> such an illogical stance against such a large group of people.
>> 
>> 
> I'd say that the liberals are the ones going ballistic.
> 

I am noting Owl's stance here: "If you see a liberal, kill it."

That is him promoting violence against others for merely disagreeing.

Overall, I would say liberals are far less likely to promote violence... but
with support for Clinton they have shown a very pro-war stance. Worse than
that, they have accepted that election fraud and voter manipulation is an
acceptable way to "play" politics. To me that is repressible. I do not
defend that in any way.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366189

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/21/16, 10:04 AM, in article npcmuj$ipb$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote:
> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> I'd say that the liberals are the ones going ballistic.
>> 
> 
> I am noting Owl's stance here: "If you see a liberal, kill it."
> 
> That is him promoting violence against others for merely disagreeing.
> 
> Overall, I would say liberals are far less likely to promote violence...

LOL!  It is the LIBERALS who riot and attack people.  Every time.
At every rally.  It is always the LIBERALS who are the troublemakers,
instigators, attackers.  It is their nature.  They are criminals at
the core.  That's why so many of them are in prison.  The Democrat party
knows this and that is why Terry McCauliffe tries to restore felons'
voting rights in VA.  That is why they turn a blind eye to Hillary
Clinton's flamboyant criminality.  You, Snit, align yourself with these
disgusting criminals out of some misplaced sense of social justice.
You are brainwashed and pathetic, and you better get one of your bloods
to put you in touch with pair of Nikes, because one day soon you're
going to be doing a lot of running.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366191

On 8/21/16, 11:42 AM, in article fhjcsfoe973.ag@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 8/21/16, 10:04 AM, in article npcmuj$ipb$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> I'd say that the liberals are the ones going ballistic.
>>> 
>> 
>> I am noting Owl's stance here: "If you see a liberal, kill it."
>> 
>> That is him promoting violence against others for merely disagreeing.
>> 
>> Overall, I would say liberals are far less likely to promote violence...
> 
> LOL!  It is the LIBERALS who riot and attack people.  Every time.


An absolutely absurd claim but even if true would not mean all liberals do
this. Does not in any way excuse your pissing on the rule of law with your
call of violence against people for MERELY disagreeing with you.

    "If you see a liberal, kill it."

If you want to say you meant that colloquially as a sign of disagreeing with
the liberal worldview then, sure, you can dig yourself out of the hole you
have dug. But you have worked against that at every chance.

Below you make a bunch of completely unsupported, absurd, and irrelevant
accusations to try to defend your desire to piss on the rule of law and be
thought police.

You DO sound like a conservative! :)

> At every rally.  It is always the LIBERALS who are the troublemakers,
> instigators, attackers.  It is their nature.  They are criminals at
> the core.  That's why so many of them are in prison.  The Democrat party
> knows this and that is why Terry McCauliffe tries to restore felons'
> voting rights in VA.  That is why they turn a blind eye to Hillary
> Clinton's flamboyant criminality.  You, Snit, align yourself with these
> disgusting criminals out of some misplaced sense of social justice.
> You are brainwashed and pathetic, and you better get one of your bloods
> to put you in touch with pair of Nikes, because one day soon you're
> going to be doing a lot of running.
> 



-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366280

On 08/21/16 12:42, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>  wrote:
>> On 8/21/16, 10:04 AM, in article npcmuj$ipb$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>> <mist@cumulus.com>  wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I'd say that the liberals are the ones going ballistic.
>>>
>>
>> I am noting Owl's stance here: "If you see a liberal, kill it."
>>
>> That is him promoting violence against others for merely disagreeing.
>>
>> Overall, I would say liberals are far less likely to promote violence...
>
> LOL!  It is the LIBERALS who riot and attack people.  Every time.
> At every rally.  It is always the LIBERALS who are the troublemakers,
> instigators, attackers.  It is their nature.  They are criminals at
> the core.  That's why so many of them are in prison.  The Democrat party
> knows this and that is why Terry McCauliffe tries to restore felons'
> voting rights in VA.  That is why they turn a blind eye to Hillary
> Clinton's flamboyant criminality.  You, Snit, align yourself with these
> disgusting criminals out of some misplaced sense of social justice.
> You are brainwashed and pathetic, and you better get one of your bloods
> to put you in touch with pair of Nikes, because one day soon you're
> going to be doing a lot of running.
>
That's because they don't want to see the status quo go away... you 
know, welfare.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366287

On 8/22/16, 11:25 AM, in article npfg2b$ciu$4@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
<mist@cumulus.com> wrote:

> On 08/21/16 12:42, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>  wrote:
>>> On 8/21/16, 10:04 AM, in article npcmuj$ipb$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>>> <mist@cumulus.com>  wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> I'd say that the liberals are the ones going ballistic.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I am noting Owl's stance here: "If you see a liberal, kill it."
>>> 
>>> That is him promoting violence against others for merely disagreeing.
>>> 
>>> Overall, I would say liberals are far less likely to promote violence...
>> 
>> LOL!  It is the LIBERALS who riot and attack people.  Every time.
>> At every rally.  It is always the LIBERALS who are the troublemakers,
>> instigators, attackers.  It is their nature.  They are criminals at
>> the core.  That's why so many of them are in prison.  The Democrat party
>> knows this and that is why Terry McCauliffe tries to restore felons'
>> voting rights in VA.  That is why they turn a blind eye to Hillary
>> Clinton's flamboyant criminality.  You, Snit, align yourself with these
>> disgusting criminals out of some misplaced sense of social justice.
>> You are brainwashed and pathetic, and you better get one of your bloods
>> to put you in touch with pair of Nikes, because one day soon you're
>> going to be doing a lot of running.
>> 
> That's because they don't want to see the status quo go away... you
> know, welfare.
> 
Liberals want to REDUCE welfare... keep in mind that most of the welfare of
this country goes to the rich. I worked out the numbers at one point:
assuming you want what most want, meaning tax money going to help support
mentally handicapped orphans and others truly in need, then the money that
goes to the poor that you do not want is somewhere around one penny for
every dollar that goes to the rich.

We, as a society, focus on this one ill gotten penny and not the dollar that
is the real problem.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web