Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366701
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: If you see a liberal |
| Date | 2016-08-25 09:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E4688B.7A120%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <fhjau0v83.ag32tt@perch.invalid> <D3DE86AC.79BBC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <fhjcis983.ajfu@perch.invalid> <D3DE8F53.79BC3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <npmmhq$cvg$3@dont-email.me> |
On 8/25/16, 4:58 AM, in article npmmhq$cvg$3@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2016-08-21 1:50 AM, Snit wrote: >> On 8/20/16, 10:21 PM, in article fhjcis983.ajfu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >> ... >>>>> I don't shun the rule of law. >>>> >>>> Look at the start of the thread. You threw law and morality away to not >>>> only >>>> wish death on people but to call on others to engage in violence based on a >>>> video you saw depicting a small number of people acting poorly. >>> >>> You libtard monkeys act like that everywhere you go. >> >> See: from you we get name calling and attacks against whole groups of people >> based on the action of a very few. Reminds me of how many in the US attack >> all Muslims. A tiny, tiny fraction act poorly so ALL are deemed bad. Same >> with other groups: Christians, blacks, whites, atheists, etc. >> >> It is reprehensible and AGAINST the rule of law and basic morality. > > Statistics don't support your statement. Muslims in the United States > and Europe were polled not too long ago to determine to what extent they > support terrorism, Sharia and the Islamic State. Regardless of whether > they themselves committed any kind of terrorism, the reality is that a > _significant_ amount of them support all three of the above. I have read such stats and talked about them in the past. I find them troubling. I also find it troubling how Christians in the US support lesser rights for atheists, the attacks against Muslim nations, and other rather abhorrent things! Even then, the Christian extremism is less so than what is shown in polls about Muslims. I do not deny that. But to generalize these things to all Christians or all Muslims is wrong. > They truly do see the West as a problem and want to see it replaced by the > Middle-Aged bullshit they follow in their own countries. Shia Muslims are a > lot more receptive to the West, but Sunnis are overwhelmingly against it and > should not be allowed anywhere near North America or Europe. People should be judged for who they are, not if they are Christian or Muslim or Sunni or Shia or Catholic or Morman. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-20 22:17 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 16:56 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 00:18 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 17:27 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 00:49 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 18:38 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 01:51 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 19:44 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 03:08 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 20:15 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 03:34 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 21:02 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 04:22 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 22:14 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 05:21 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 22:50 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 06:00 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 23:16 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 06:35 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 10:01 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 07:58 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:19 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 07:54 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:16 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 01:07 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 05:15 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 09:35 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 15:13 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-21 12:22 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-21 11:06 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 18:38 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-21 19:08 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-22 06:59 -0500
So, now you are an outhouse attendent? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-22 12:23 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-21 11:04 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 10:08 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 18:42 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 12:25 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-22 12:25 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 11:39 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 11:53 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:07 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:54 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:40 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 08:36 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:24 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-22 12:24 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 11:26 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 11:55 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:05 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:54 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:38 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:09 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:25 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 14:09 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:20 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 07:52 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:15 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-21 11:03 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 07:49 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 15:54 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:19 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 17:33 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:39 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 17:46 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:01 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:41 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:51 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 12:22 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 16:00 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:04 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:39 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 18:54 +0000
csiph-web