Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #365289 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-12 19:31 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-08-13 13:11 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 123 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-12 19:31 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-12 19:39 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-13 02:51 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-12 20:22 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 23:36 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-08-13 06:42 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 08:57 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-13 07:28 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-15 09:37 -0500
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 10:45 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-15 16:35 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-16 00:17 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-16 04:36 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-16 22:15 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 15:49 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-17 13:56 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 18:15 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 08:40 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 15:54 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-18 12:55 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-17 12:26 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-16 22:14 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-17 07:49 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 15:45 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-17 14:05 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 18:16 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-17 18:19 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-17 21:58 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 08:39 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-18 12:57 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 13:47 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-18 16:48 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 21:31 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-18 16:59 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 23:18 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-19 13:30 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-19 18:25 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-19 23:33 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-19 19:50 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-20 00:03 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-20 12:56 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-20 12:54 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-17 12:36 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-17 12:35 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 20:15 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-17 21:59 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-17 20:22 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-17 22:06 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-17 12:33 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 17:05 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 13:08 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-15 10:22 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 13:53 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-16 00:09 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 08:36 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 19:28 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-15 12:59 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice kubuntuking@gmail.com - 2016-08-15 14:50 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-16 22:17 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 17:55 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 03:47 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-15 21:02 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-08-16 13:55 +0100
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-16 00:07 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 10:39 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 14:00 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 12:22 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 17:54 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-15 14:34 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-15 15:42 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-15 15:50 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-15 17:14 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-15 17:44 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-15 17:54 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-15 18:04 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-16 01:18 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-15 18:22 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-16 22:19 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 15:58 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-17 09:16 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-17 12:36 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-15 18:28 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-15 18:38 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-15 19:08 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-15 19:11 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-15 19:24 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-15 19:28 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-15 19:35 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-16 02:43 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-15 19:58 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 18:51 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-15 16:09 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-15 17:16 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-15 17:34 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 22:43 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-15 19:59 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-15 21:27 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-15 18:30 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 22:47 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-15 19:49 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 22:54 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-15 19:56 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 23:01 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-15 20:05 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 03:49 +0000
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-15 21:02 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-16 06:52 -0500
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-16 07:07 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 22:45 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-16 07:12 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 08:37 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-16 22:24 -0600
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-15 12:17 -0500
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-15 14:30 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-16 00:08 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-15 21:21 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-13 09:26 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-13 09:27 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 09:42 -0400
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 07:18 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 07:07 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-13 09:35 -0700
Re: Lithuania goes LibreOffice DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-13 13:11 -0400
Page 2 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-17 12:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <np2a9f$h5m$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #365792 |
On 08/17/16 11:56, DFS wrote: > On 8/16/2016 12:36 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 8/15/2016 12:35 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> "owl" wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The choices: >>>>>>> 1. MS Office. >>>>>>> 2. LibreOffice, guns, body armor. >>>>> >>>>> It's really quite stunning that, in these times, more places are not >>>>> dumping MSO to save money. >>>>> >>>>> Windows I can understand can be difficult for an organization to >>>>> leave. But MSO? Just dump it! >>>>> >>>> >>>> MS Office is just plain dangerous. >>>> https://vid.me/WtqO >>> >>> >>> More dangerous than the massively, supremely, stupendously idiotic >>> Donald Trump? >>> >>> >>> >>> <quote> >>> In a GOP debate, Trump was asked which leg of the nuclear triad was most >>> important to him and how he would prioritise funding – to the >>> submarines, bombers or missiles. In a rambling answer that was so >>> incoherent it sent shock waves across the globe Trump managed to say >>> something that made sense. >>> >>> He warned viewers of the dangerous possibility of "having some maniac, >>> having some madman go out and get a nuclear weapon," and said "that's in >>> my opinion, that is the single biggest problem that our country faces >>> right now." >>> </quote> >>> >>> http://www.smh.com.au/comment/memo-donald-trump-the-very-point-of-nuclear-weapons-is-that-they-are-never-used-20160812-gqqysb.html >>> >>> >> >> Those morons apparently haven't been paying attention for the last >> 70 years. The US has always reserved the right to launch a first >> strike. The point of nuclear weapons is not that they will never >> be used, but that they *will* be used if you fuck with us. >> >> http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304620304575166263632513790 >> <quote> >> Updated April 6, 2010 12:01 a.m. ET >> WASHINGTON—The Obama administration will release a new national >> nuclear-weapons strategy Tuesday that makes only modest changes to >> U.S. nuclear forces, leaving intact the longstanding U.S. threat to use >> nuclear weapons first, even against non-nuclear nations. >> </quote> > > > > Some more Trump idiocy: > > http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/his-words-19-notable-thoughts-donald-trump-n630446 > > > The guy's a lunatic and an embarrassment to the United States - > definitely not fit to serve as President. I agree more with his > "policies" (in quotes because most of it is made up on the spot - then > later changed) than with Clinton's, but neither of them will get my vote. > > Have you seen him and Hannity babbling about Clinton having a seizure or > stroke, and being in ill health? How ridiculous can grown men get? > > His lies and dodges about his tax returns should be enough for most > people to disqualify him. 100 to 1 his tax filings prove he's just > lying, that he's not as wealthy or successful as he claims. > > > <quote> > In his 92-page financial disclosure to the Federal Election Commission > (F.E.C.) in July 2015 and in a second, 104-page disclosure last May, in > both of which he calls himself “President of the United States of > America” (Hillary humbly calls herself “Candidate for President”), he > lists at least $1.5 billion in hard assets. Of this, a minimum of $787 > million is in hotels and real estate such as Trump Tower, in Manhattan. > There are also 16 golf-related businesses valued at more than $550 > million, aircraft worth at least $58 million, $6 million in vineyards, > and $4.3 million in entertainment ventures. These are lower-bound > numbers: categories include “over $50 million,” with no upper limit. > (The main purpose of these disclosures isn’t to build a full picture of > a candidate’s finances but to identify conflicts of interest.) Trump > claimed to me that his net worth is “much more than $10 billion…. I > don’t know how much more.” A Trump press release in July 2015 also > claimed his net worth was “in excess of TEN BILLION DOLLARS,” though > Fortune in May estimated it at $3.9 billion, and Bloomberg News reckoned > it at $2.9 billion last July. (Michael Bloomberg, by comparison, is > worth $45 billion, according to Forbes.) > </quote> > > http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/06/the-great-trump-tax-mysteries > > > Clinton lies, too, but nothing like Trump. > > Vote your conscience is all I have to say. I'll be writing-in another > name, probably a Republican, definitely not a Dem. > Trump hasn't lied in a long time. Are you still listening to the main stream media lies where Clinton is in the back pocket of George Soros that owns the media? Alternative news is telling the truth. Hilliary has brain cancer and can barely walk. Trump is a mason... the ones that created the U.S. Constitution.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 22:14 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <np0ob0$okc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #365602 |
On 08/15/16 22:17, DFS wrote: > On 8/15/2016 12:35 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> "owl" wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The choices: >>>>> 1. MS Office. >>>>> 2. LibreOffice, guns, body armor. >>> >>> It's really quite stunning that, in these times, more places are not >>> dumping MSO to save money. >>> >>> Windows I can understand can be difficult for an organization to >>> leave. But MSO? Just dump it! >>> >> >> MS Office is just plain dangerous. >> https://vid.me/WtqO > > > More dangerous than the massively, supremely, stupendously idiotic > Donald Trump? > > > > <quote> > In a GOP debate, Trump was asked which leg of the nuclear triad was most > important to him and how he would prioritise funding – to the > submarines, bombers or missiles. In a rambling answer that was so > incoherent it sent shock waves across the globe Trump managed to say > something that made sense. > > He warned viewers of the dangerous possibility of "having some maniac, > having some madman go out and get a nuclear weapon," and said "that's in > my opinion, that is the single biggest problem that our country faces > right now." > </quote> > > http://www.smh.com.au/comment/memo-donald-trump-the-very-point-of-nuclear-weapons-is-that-they-are-never-used-20160812-gqqysb.html > > > I can't determine whether you are pro trump or pro hilliary. Don't forget that she has serious health issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-17 07:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <np1j1i$voh$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #365718 |
On 8/17/2016 12:14 AM, GreyCloud wrote: > On 08/15/16 22:17, DFS wrote: > I can't determine whether you are pro trump or pro hilliary. They both make me ill, but I'm trying to find a way to support Trump because I like his blunt talk and some of his policies. But I don't trust him whatsoever - he won't even reveal his tax returns. A lot of the time he doesn't even seem to be taking his candidacy seriously. I've always voted Republican, and I don't see that changing. This election I'll very likely write-in a conservative. > Don't forget that she has serious health issues. No, she doesn't. That's just the lies and idiocy of morons trying to smear her. I'd bet anything that Trump is less healthy. Her doctor cleared her - where's Trump's doctor?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-17 15:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjgus943.agj8i@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #365747 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/17/2016 12:14 AM, GreyCloud wrote: >> On 08/15/16 22:17, DFS wrote: > >> I can't determine whether you are pro trump or pro hilliary. > > They both make me ill, but I'm trying to find a way to support Trump > because I like his blunt talk and some of his policies. But I don't > trust him whatsoever - he won't even reveal his tax returns. A lot of > the time he doesn't even seem to be taking his candidacy seriously. > > I've always voted Republican, and I don't see that changing. This > election I'll very likely write-in a conservative. > You Romneytards are determined to get Hillary elected, aren't you? Listen closely. Ted Cruz lost. To quote a great man, "We don't want you." Get over the butthurt already, unless you want Cankles appointing three or four Supreme Court justices. > > >> Don't forget that she has serious health issues. > > No, she doesn't. That's just the lies and idiocy of morons trying to > smear her. She does have health issues. She had a blood clot on her brain. It's still affecting her. > I'd bet anything that Trump is less healthy. Her doctor > cleared her - where's Trump's doctor? > OMG. You are a Hillary supporter.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-17 14:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <np2917$csa$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #365775 |
On 8/17/2016 11:45 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > OMG. You are a Hillary supporter. You're her fashion consultant and waterboy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-17 18:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <afakvjc83.a@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #365794 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/17/2016 11:45 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > > >> OMG. You are a Hillary supporter. > > > You're her fashion consultant and waterboy. > Careful. Being on her shitlist is potentially fatal.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-17 18:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <np2nut$4sq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #365798 |
On 8/17/2016 2:16 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 8/17/2016 11:45 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> >> >>> OMG. You are a Hillary supporter. >> >> >> You're her fashion consultant and waterboy. >> > > Careful. Being on her shitlist is potentially fatal. I know... how does she even find time to campaign between cutting up all those bodies? Does Chelsea help her?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-17 21:58 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <np3bp3$jhj$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #365829 |
On 08/17/16 16:19, DFS wrote: > On 8/17/2016 2:16 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 8/17/2016 11:45 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>> >>> >>>> OMG. You are a Hillary supporter. >>> >>> >>> You're her fashion consultant and waterboy. >>> >> >> Careful. Being on her shitlist is potentially fatal. > > > I know... how does she even find time to campaign between cutting up all > those bodies? Does Chelsea help her? > > Nah. She lets the CIA do that gruesome work.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 08:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <np4a9u$8u6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #365867 |
On 8/17/2016 11:58 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > On 08/17/16 16:19, DFS wrote: >> On 8/17/2016 2:16 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/17/2016 11:45 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> OMG. You are a Hillary supporter. >>>> >>>> >>>> You're her fashion consultant and waterboy. >>>> >>> >>> Careful. Being on her shitlist is potentially fatal. >> >> >> I know... how does she even find time to campaign between cutting up all >> those bodies? Does Chelsea help her? >> >> > Nah. She lets the CIA do that gruesome work. You probably do believe that. Talk about being brainwashed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 12:57 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <np50er$ud6$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #365889 |
On 08/18/16 06:39, DFS wrote: > On 8/17/2016 11:58 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> On 08/17/16 16:19, DFS wrote: >>> On 8/17/2016 2:16 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/17/2016 11:45 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> OMG. You are a Hillary supporter. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You're her fashion consultant and waterboy. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Careful. Being on her shitlist is potentially fatal. >>> >>> >>> I know... how does she even find time to campaign between cutting up all >>> those bodies? Does Chelsea help her? >>> >>> >> Nah. She lets the CIA do that gruesome work. > > > You probably do believe that. Talk about being brainwashed. > > Hardly. At least I worked in that arena a long time ago. The FBI hates the CIA and the CIA hates the NSA. Nice bunch of people watching over this country while the CIA is selling dope on the streets so that they don't have to rely on congressional budget probes, which funds their illegitimate operations. The only brainwashed people are the ones that listen to the MSM. All total fabrications.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 13:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c57abd9d-1ee1-4629-90a5-9de70ea47037@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #365962 |
On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 12:57:34 PM UTC-6, GreyCloud wrote: > On 08/18/16 06:39, DFS wrote: > > On 8/17/2016 11:58 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > >> On 08/17/16 16:19, DFS wrote: > >>> On 8/17/2016 2:16 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > >>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > >>>>> On 8/17/2016 11:45 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> OMG. You are a Hillary supporter. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> You're her fashion consultant and waterboy. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Careful. Being on her shitlist is potentially fatal. > >>> > >>> > >>> I know... how does she even find time to campaign between cutting up all > >>> those bodies? Does Chelsea help her? > >>> > >>> > >> Nah. She lets the CIA do that gruesome work. > > > > > > You probably do believe that. Talk about being brainwashed. > > > > > Hardly. At least I worked in that arena a long time ago. > The FBI hates the CIA and the CIA hates the NSA. > Nice bunch of people watching over this country while the CIA is selling > dope on the streets so that they don't have to rely on congressional > budget probes, which funds their illegitimate operations. > > The only brainwashed people are the ones that listen to the MSM. This looks like it might be a form of brainwashing: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Queah3jAxeE>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 16:48 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <np5dvl$fmd$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #365978 |
On 08/18/16 14:47, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 12:57:34 PM UTC-6, GreyCloud wrote: >> On 08/18/16 06:39, DFS wrote: >>> On 8/17/2016 11:58 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> On 08/17/16 16:19, DFS wrote: >>>>> On 8/17/2016 2:16 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>>> DFS<nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/17/2016 11:45 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OMG. You are a Hillary supporter. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You're her fashion consultant and waterboy. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Careful. Being on her shitlist is potentially fatal. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I know... how does she even find time to campaign between cutting up all >>>>> those bodies? Does Chelsea help her? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Nah. She lets the CIA do that gruesome work. >>> >>> >>> You probably do believe that. Talk about being brainwashed. >>> >>> >> Hardly. At least I worked in that arena a long time ago. >> The FBI hates the CIA and the CIA hates the NSA. >> Nice bunch of people watching over this country while the CIA is selling >> dope on the streets so that they don't have to rely on congressional >> budget probes, which funds their illegitimate operations. >> >> The only brainwashed people are the ones that listen to the MSM. > > This looks like it might be a form of brainwashing: > > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Queah3jAxeE> > Coulda sworn that was New York City. :-))
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 21:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sfjgie03.ago4@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #365962 |
GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > On 08/18/16 06:39, DFS wrote: >> On 8/17/2016 11:58 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> On 08/17/16 16:19, DFS wrote: >>>> On 8/17/2016 2:16 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 8/17/2016 11:45 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> OMG. You are a Hillary supporter. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You're her fashion consultant and waterboy. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Careful. Being on her shitlist is potentially fatal. >>>> >>>> >>>> I know... how does she even find time to campaign between cutting up all >>>> those bodies? Does Chelsea help her? >>>> >>>> >>> Nah. She lets the CIA do that gruesome work. >> >> >> You probably do believe that. Talk about being brainwashed. >> >> > Hardly. At least I worked in that arena a long time ago. > The FBI hates the CIA and the CIA hates the NSA. > Nice bunch of people watching over this country while the CIA is selling > dope on the streets so that they don't have to rely on congressional > budget probes, which funds their illegitimate operations. > > The only brainwashed people are the ones that listen to the MSM. > All total fabrications. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDCfTIapds0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 16:59 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <np5ek5$i4o$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #365984 |
On 08/18/16 15:31, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > GreyCloud<mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> On 08/18/16 06:39, DFS wrote: >>> On 8/17/2016 11:58 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> On 08/17/16 16:19, DFS wrote: >>>>> On 8/17/2016 2:16 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>>> DFS<nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/17/2016 11:45 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OMG. You are a Hillary supporter. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You're her fashion consultant and waterboy. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Careful. Being on her shitlist is potentially fatal. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I know... how does she even find time to campaign between cutting up all >>>>> those bodies? Does Chelsea help her? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Nah. She lets the CIA do that gruesome work. >>> >>> >>> You probably do believe that. Talk about being brainwashed. >>> >>> >> Hardly. At least I worked in that arena a long time ago. >> The FBI hates the CIA and the CIA hates the NSA. >> Nice bunch of people watching over this country while the CIA is selling >> dope on the streets so that they don't have to rely on congressional >> budget probes, which funds their illegitimate operations. >> >> The only brainwashed people are the ones that listen to the MSM. >> All total fabrications. >> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDCfTIapds0 > Hehe... That was around the time I was working for the NSA at the time. CIA was heavily funded by all the street dope heads at that time, so they really didn't care if congress cut all of their budget. I remember while being in Panama that the Air Force C-130s were leaving fully loaded with cocaine heading for the U.S. The military didn't have customs searching anything at their air bases in the U.S., so tons of dope were divided up to various DEA agents and passed on to the various drug king pins around the country. No way could that much dope end up in all major cities without this kind of a distribution network. During that time, earlier in 1968, the panamanian military coup the news agencies took the only feed available to them was from the military Intel bunch. The news feed was carefully crafted to not contain any actual numbers or types of tanks that the panamanian government had and just said that they had many tanks... yeah, like two old rusty M-80s from WWII, but they knew that the public would envision many Abrahms style tanks instead. It is these little lies that distorts the truth. That's why the vast majority of people have never been educated about the real nature of journalism, if that is what they want to call it. Remember Bill Clintons nuance of speech "Depends on what you mean by IS." He knew. So as Michael Savage said, "There are no real journalists today." Which is the basis of propaganda today.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 23:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjciae983.8@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #365999 |
GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > On 08/18/16 15:31, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> GreyCloud<mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>> On 08/18/16 06:39, DFS wrote: >>>> On 8/17/2016 11:58 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>> On 08/17/16 16:19, DFS wrote: >>>>>> On 8/17/2016 2:16 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>>>> DFS<nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 8/17/2016 11:45 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> OMG. You are a Hillary supporter. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You're her fashion consultant and waterboy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Careful. Being on her shitlist is potentially fatal. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I know... how does she even find time to campaign between cutting up all >>>>>> those bodies? Does Chelsea help her? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Nah. She lets the CIA do that gruesome work. >>>> >>>> >>>> You probably do believe that. Talk about being brainwashed. >>>> >>>> >>> Hardly. At least I worked in that arena a long time ago. >>> The FBI hates the CIA and the CIA hates the NSA. >>> Nice bunch of people watching over this country while the CIA is selling >>> dope on the streets so that they don't have to rely on congressional >>> budget probes, which funds their illegitimate operations. >>> >>> The only brainwashed people are the ones that listen to the MSM. >>> All total fabrications. >>> >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDCfTIapds0 >> > Hehe... That was around the time I was working for the NSA at the time. > CIA was heavily funded by all the street dope heads at that time, so > they really didn't care if congress cut all of their budget. I remember > while being in Panama that the Air Force C-130s were leaving fully > loaded with cocaine heading for the U.S. The military didn't have > customs searching anything at their air bases in the U.S., so tons of > dope were divided up to various DEA agents and passed on to the various > drug king pins around the country. No way could that much dope end up > in all major cities without this kind of a distribution network. > > During that time, earlier in 1968, the panamanian military coup the news > agencies took the only feed available to them was from the military > Intel bunch. The news feed was carefully crafted to not contain any > actual numbers or types of tanks that the panamanian government had and > just said that they had many tanks... yeah, like two old rusty M-80s > from WWII, but they knew that the public would envision many Abrahms > style tanks instead. It is these little lies that distorts the truth. > That's why the vast majority of people have never been educated about > the real nature of journalism, if that is what they want to call it. > Remember Bill Clintons nuance of speech "Depends on what you mean by > IS." He knew. So as Michael Savage said, "There are no real > journalists today." Which is the basis of propaganda today. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anderson_Cooper <quote> During college, Cooper spent two summers as an intern at the Central Intelligence Agency. Although he has no formal journalistic education, he opted to pursue a career in journalism rather than stay with the agency after school,[14][15] having been a self-proclaimed "news junkie since [he] was in utero."[16] </quote>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-19 13:30 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <np7mo8$ccj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366004 |
On 08/18/16 17:18, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > GreyCloud<mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> On 08/18/16 15:31, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>> GreyCloud<mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>>> On 08/18/16 06:39, DFS wrote: >>>>> On 8/17/2016 11:58 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>> On 08/17/16 16:19, DFS wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/17/2016 2:16 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>>>>> DFS<nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 8/17/2016 11:45 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> OMG. You are a Hillary supporter. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You're her fashion consultant and waterboy. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Careful. Being on her shitlist is potentially fatal. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I know... how does she even find time to campaign between cutting up all >>>>>>> those bodies? Does Chelsea help her? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Nah. She lets the CIA do that gruesome work. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You probably do believe that. Talk about being brainwashed. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Hardly. At least I worked in that arena a long time ago. >>>> The FBI hates the CIA and the CIA hates the NSA. >>>> Nice bunch of people watching over this country while the CIA is selling >>>> dope on the streets so that they don't have to rely on congressional >>>> budget probes, which funds their illegitimate operations. >>>> >>>> The only brainwashed people are the ones that listen to the MSM. >>>> All total fabrications. >>>> >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDCfTIapds0 >>> >> Hehe... That was around the time I was working for the NSA at the time. >> CIA was heavily funded by all the street dope heads at that time, so >> they really didn't care if congress cut all of their budget. I remember >> while being in Panama that the Air Force C-130s were leaving fully >> loaded with cocaine heading for the U.S. The military didn't have >> customs searching anything at their air bases in the U.S., so tons of >> dope were divided up to various DEA agents and passed on to the various >> drug king pins around the country. No way could that much dope end up >> in all major cities without this kind of a distribution network. >> >> During that time, earlier in 1968, the panamanian military coup the news >> agencies took the only feed available to them was from the military >> Intel bunch. The news feed was carefully crafted to not contain any >> actual numbers or types of tanks that the panamanian government had and >> just said that they had many tanks... yeah, like two old rusty M-80s >> from WWII, but they knew that the public would envision many Abrahms >> style tanks instead. It is these little lies that distorts the truth. >> That's why the vast majority of people have never been educated about >> the real nature of journalism, if that is what they want to call it. >> Remember Bill Clintons nuance of speech "Depends on what you mean by >> IS." He knew. So as Michael Savage said, "There are no real >> journalists today." Which is the basis of propaganda today. >> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anderson_Cooper > <quote> > During college, Cooper spent two summers as an intern at the Central > Intelligence Agency. Although he has no formal journalistic education, he > opted to pursue a career in journalism rather than stay with the agency > after school,[14][15] having been a self-proclaimed "news junkie since > [he] was in utero."[16] > </quote> > LOL!!! So typical of the CIA. Give em a degree and then they believe it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-19 18:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <np811j$h5h$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #365962 |
On 8/18/2016 2:57 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > On 08/18/16 06:39, DFS wrote: >> On 8/17/2016 11:58 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> On 08/17/16 16:19, DFS wrote: >>>> On 8/17/2016 2:16 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 8/17/2016 11:45 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> OMG. You are a Hillary supporter. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You're her fashion consultant and waterboy. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Careful. Being on her shitlist is potentially fatal. >>>> >>>> >>>> I know... how does she even find time to campaign between cutting up >>>> all >>>> those bodies? Does Chelsea help her? >>>> >>>> >>> Nah. She lets the CIA do that gruesome work. >> >> >> You probably do believe that. Talk about being brainwashed. >> >> > Hardly. At least I worked in that arena a long time ago. What does 'worked in that arena' mean? And you don't honestly think the CIA sends out teams of hit men to kill the Clintons' enemies, do you? It's one of the most moronic conspiracy theories I've ever heard. And course there's not a single shred of evidence to support it. > The FBI hates the CIA and the CIA hates the NSA. > Nice bunch of people watching over this country while the CIA is selling > dope on the streets so that they don't have to rely on congressional > budget probes, which funds their illegitimate operations. > > The only brainwashed people are the ones that listen to the MSM. > All total fabrications. So show me how your "alternative media" - or whatever paranoid dreck you and owl read - is honest, factual and unbiased.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-19 23:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjavidue892.y@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366085 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/18/2016 2:57 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> On 08/18/16 06:39, DFS wrote: >>> On 8/17/2016 11:58 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> On 08/17/16 16:19, DFS wrote: >>>>> On 8/17/2016 2:16 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/17/2016 11:45 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OMG. You are a Hillary supporter. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You're her fashion consultant and waterboy. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Careful. Being on her shitlist is potentially fatal. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I know... how does she even find time to campaign between cutting up >>>>> all >>>>> those bodies? Does Chelsea help her? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Nah. She lets the CIA do that gruesome work. >>> >>> >>> You probably do believe that. Talk about being brainwashed. >>> >>> >> Hardly. At least I worked in that arena a long time ago. > > > What does 'worked in that arena' mean? > > And you don't honestly think the CIA sends out teams of hit men to kill > the Clintons' enemies, do you? > > It's one of the most moronic conspiracy theories I've ever heard. And > course there's not a single shred of evidence to support it. > > > >> The FBI hates the CIA and the CIA hates the NSA. >> Nice bunch of people watching over this country while the CIA is selling >> dope on the streets so that they don't have to rely on congressional >> budget probes, which funds their illegitimate operations. >> >> The only brainwashed people are the ones that listen to the MSM. >> All total fabrications. > > > So show me how your "alternative media" - or whatever paranoid dreck you > and owl read - is honest, factual and unbiased. > That's quite a vagina you're growing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-19 19:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <np8618$ujd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366094 |
On 8/19/2016 7:33 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > That's quite a vagina you're growing. Trump has already turned you into a moron, and he hasn't even been defeated.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-20 00:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ghjdau93.ppg@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366097 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/19/2016 7:33 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > > >> That's quite a vagina you're growing. > > > Trump has already turned you into a moron, and he hasn't even been defeated. > Speaking of morons, why would anybody store top-secret emails as plaintext?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web