Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366369 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-23 17:51 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-08-25 14:00 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 113 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:51 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:18 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 18:32 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:43 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 19:13 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 12:29 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 19:53 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 13:07 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 20:33 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 13:41 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 21:01 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 14:14 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:01 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:12 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:43 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:50 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 23:26 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 16:57 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:41 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 18:56 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 03:16 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 20:23 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 03:40 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 20:46 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 04:10 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:29 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 04:44 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 07:56 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:45 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:49 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 16:00 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:15 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 16:42 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:50 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 17:58 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:12 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 18:54 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 12:06 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:25 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 12:41 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:55 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:13 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:29 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:34 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:50 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:55 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:59 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:02 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:09 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:14 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:27 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:32 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:47 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:56 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 23:51 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:00 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:28 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:32 -0700
An example Owl asked for 5 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for 5 "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:38 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for 5 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:59 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 15:04 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 00:00 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:03 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:28 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:33 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:52 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 19:01 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 02:49 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:06 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:27 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:24 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:21 -0600
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:51 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:27 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:23 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-25 07:04 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:56 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 19:03 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:00 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:19 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:32 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:25 -0700
An example Owl asked for 6 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for 6 "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:39 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for 6 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:58 -0700
An example Owl asked for 4 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
An example Owl asked for 3 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:30 -0700
An example Owl asked for 2 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:30 -0700
An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:29 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:33 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:40 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:45 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:58 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 21:07 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:09 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:30 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:38 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:28 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:33 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 09:44 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:19 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:32 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:16 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:31 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 09:42 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 13:05 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:17 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 11:06 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:51 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 12:56 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 16:54 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:00 -0700
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 20:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E3B1BB.7A04B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366596 |
On 8/24/16, 8:00 PM, in article hjavd.k9pll3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 8/24/16, 6:56 PM, in article hguaove.37u@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> On 8/24/16, 5:00 PM, in article fhjba004.agae3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Just answer the question,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Read what you snipped:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Two replies and still no answer.
>>>>
>>>> I owe you no answer to your irrelevant questions but gave you one anyway:
>>>>
>>>
>>> Again afraid to answer a simple "Yes" or "No" question because you
>>> know the answer will show your RACISM in full light.
>>>
>>> Would you say this to a black man:
>>>
>>> "Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
>>> entitled to."
>>>
>>> Yes or No?
>>>
>> You feel entitled not only to DEMAND I answer your irrelevant question
>> (which I finally did!) but that I do so with a single word answer
>
>
> Because it is a simple YES or NO question.
You feel entitled to get an answer other than the very clear one you have
gotten. Boo hoo for you and your entitlement world view.
-----
Because it is not relevant... but, hey, just to shove your
nonsense in your face even more, ANYONE who says that simply
supporting equality shows you are racist against them is being
absurd and showing a sense of entitlement and privilege.
There may be disagreements on how to achieve equality based on
historic and current conditions, but you just went with EQUALITY
itself being somehow "racist" against you. This absolutely shows
you having a sense of entitlement and privilege. No doubt. And you
keep doing it.
Meanwhile you just lash out with insults you cannot even begin to
back.
-----
>> when doing so would be to feed into your false dichotomy AS you spew baseless
>> insults about me.
>
> Yes, words have consequences.
Sure. I called you out on your gross sense of entitlement and privilege and
now you are lashing out with anger and dishonesty and blaming me. I am not
surprised by it.
Look below where you lash out with baseless accusations of racism, hatred,
whining about me not giving into your sense of entitlement and giving you a
single word answer to your false dichotomy, your lies about my views, etc.
You are proving, time and time again, how even you know your stance is
completely indefensible... hence why you try to put me on the defensive with
such nonsense. Do you think that is working well for you... yes or no? LOL!
> That's why some words, such as that hateful spew of yours, are deemed RACIST.
> The fact that you refuse to answer a simple YES or NO question as whether or
> not you would make that statement to a black man is telling.
>
> There is in my mind no doubt that your answer is "No", but you refuse to admit
> it, because then the next question would be, "Why then would you make such a
> statement to a white man?"
>
> If instead you were to answer "Yes", then it would be obviously racist. I
> mean, how dare a white man tell a black man: "Boo hoo for you feeling like you
> are not getting what you think you are entitled to."
>
>
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 03:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hgup033.af3@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366604 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/24/16, 8:00 PM, in article hjavd.k9pll3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/24/16, 6:56 PM, in article hguaove.37u@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Again afraid to answer a simple "Yes" or "No" question because you >>>> know the answer will show your RACISM in full light. >>>> >>>> Would you say this to a black man: >>>> >>>> "Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are >>>> entitled to." >>>> >>>> Yes or No? >>>> >>> You feel entitled not only to DEMAND I answer your irrelevant question >>> (which I finally did!) but that I do so with a single word answer >> >> >> Because it is a simple YES or NO question. > > You feel entitled to get an answer other than the very clear one you have > gotten. Boo hoo for you and your entitlement world view. > We know your answer. Your answer is "No." You stepped in a tar pit, moron. Learn how to debate. You are terrible at it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 21:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E3C15B.7A065%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366610 |
On 8/24/16, 8:32 PM, in article hgup033.af3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/24/16, 8:00 PM, in article hjavd.k9pll3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/24/16, 6:56 PM, in article hguaove.37u@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Again afraid to answer a simple "Yes" or "No" question because you >>>>> know the answer will show your RACISM in full light. >>>>> >>>>> Would you say this to a black man: >>>>> >>>>> "Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you >>>>> are >>>>> entitled to." >>>>> >>>>> Yes or No? >>>>> >>>> You feel entitled not only to DEMAND I answer your irrelevant question >>>> (which I finally did!) but that I do so with a single word answer >>> >>> >>> Because it is a simple YES or NO question. >> >> You feel entitled to get an answer other than the very clear one you have >> gotten. Boo hoo for you and your entitlement world view. >> > > We know your answer. Your answer is "No." > You stepped in a tar pit, moron. > Learn how to debate. You are terrible at it. You are AGAIN lying about my views to try to change the topic from your view that equality is racist against YOU... proving you have a strong sense of entitlement and privilege. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700 |
| Subject | An example Owl asked for 6 |
| Message-ID | <D3E4A3BE.7A22B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366578 |
On 8/24/16, 5:00 PM, in article fhjba004.agae3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
...
>>> Just answer the question,
>>
>> Read what you snipped:
>>
>
> Two replies and still no answer.
I owe you no answer to your irrelevant questions but gave you one anyway:
-----
Because it is not relevant... but, hey, just to shove your
nonsense in your face even more, ANYONE who says that simply
supporting equality shows you are racist against them is being
absurd and showing a sense of entitlement and privilege.
There may be disagreements on how to achieve equality based on
historic and current conditions, but you just went with EQUALITY
itself being somehow "racist" against you. This absolutely shows
you having a sense of entitlement and privilege. No doubt. And you
keep doing it.
Meanwhile you just lash out with insults you cannot even begin to
back.
-----
When faced with that you resort to name calling and insults and accusations
you will NEVER back.
Keep in mind, YOU have repeatedly shown you think work toward equality MEANS
being unfair to you. You show a deep sense of entitlement and privilege.
> RACIST COWARD.
>
> You feel comfortable saying racist things to me, because you are OK
> with anti-white racism, but you would NEVER say something like that
> to a black man.
Read the text you snipped... your claim is a lie.
> And I guarantee you would only say it once to my
> face, and then you'd be picking your teeth up off the ground.
>
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 20:39 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: An example Owl asked for 6 |
| Message-ID | <fhbjaiv9.3@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366823 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/24/16, 5:00 PM, in article fhjba004.agae3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > > ... >>>> Just answer the question, >>> >>> Read what you snipped: >>> >> >> Two replies and still no answer. > > I owe you no answer to your irrelevant questions but gave you one anyway: > So not answering twice was not enough. You decide to not answer a third time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 13:58 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: An example Owl asked for 6 |
| Message-ID | <D3E4A9F9.7A24C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366831 |
On 8/25/16, 1:39 PM, in article fhbjaiv9.3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/24/16, 5:00 PM, in article fhjba004.agae3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >> ... >>>>> Just answer the question, >>>> >>>> Read what you snipped: >>>> >>> >>> Two replies and still no answer. >> >> I owe you no answer to your irrelevant questions but gave you one anyway: >> > > So not answering twice was not enough. You decide to not answer a third > time. > All comes down to you think equality is somehow unfair to you... which shows your sense of entitlement and privilege. Why try to make it more complex than that? Why try to bring in a million side issues? Why keep moving goal posts? Seems you are ashamed of your own sense of entitlement and privilege. If so then even you know it is wrong... and that is good. You can work toward changing it. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700 |
| Subject | An example Owl asked for 4 |
| Message-ID | <D3E4A39D.7A229%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366571 |
On 8/24/16, 2:47 PM, in article ahjfvu03a.38@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/24/16, 2:27 PM, in article ahjuv9ad3.ajvu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> THAT quote from you is in response to me speaking of equality. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It was in direct response to you saying, "Boo hoo for you." >>>>>>>>> IOW, Boo hoo whitey, you gots to pay. Check your privilege. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are >>>>>>>> entitled to. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Would you say that to a black man? >>>>>> >>>>>> Irrelevant... but clearly you THINK I would not... meaning you feel >>>>>> entitled >>>>>> to not being called out on your sense of entitlement and privilege. >>>>> >>>>> It's absolutely relevant. Would you say that to a black man? >>>> >>>> See above. You keep showing off your sense of entitlement and privilege. >>>> >>>> THAT is the issue here. >>>> >>> >>> So you refuse to answer a simple question >> >> Because it is not relevant... > > Just answer the question, RACIST. I did answer... and instead of responding in a reasonable way you repeatedly call me a racist. The fact you are lashing out like this is a sure sign of you feeling angry and insecure. Keep in mind it is YOU, not I, who repeatedly insists EQUALITY is unfair to YOU... showing your sense of entitlement and privilege. > You said this to me: > > "Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are > entitled to." Yeah, because equality is not good enough for you... you want more. You feel entitled to more. > Once again, would you say that to a black man? Already answered... even though it is not even slightly relevant. Below you make up stories about me... lying to try to put me on the defensive because even you, when facing a mirror, are ashamed of yourself. I am happy to have been able to hold up that mirror for you to look into. > Since you are likely to dodge yet again, I'll answer for you. Of course > you would NEVER say that to a BLACK man. But you feel COMFORTABLE saying > it to a WHITE man. That's because ANTI-WHITE RACISM is ACCEPTABLE to you. > And its acceptance at large is being pushed by the RACIST KKK DEMOCRAT > PARTY agenda of maintaining INSTITUTIONAL RACISM in America. > > Your HATRED is SICKENING. You disgusting BIGOT! > -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 13:30 -0700 |
| Subject | An example Owl asked for 3 |
| Message-ID | <D3E4A36E.7A228%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366491 |
On 8/24/16, 9:00 AM, in article hjgus93b.akio@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/24/16, 8:45 AM, in article fhjavd.vj9@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >> ... >>>> See how you lash out... no evidence of me being racist... esp. against >>>> whites. But you are angry, clearly, that you absolute bigotry has been >>>> shown. >>> >>> You'll never get it. >> >> Oh, I get it very well that you have gone into attack mode merely because I >> pointed out a solid, irrefutable fact: I spoke of EQUALITY -- nobody being >> given privileges based on color or sex or religion > > But giving privileges based on color or sex is exactly what you support. I said no such thing. You made that up to try to back out of your repulsive position that somehow (though you cannot say how) EQUALITY is a form of racism against YOU. You are the walking poster child of thinking you deserve privilege. > So long as the person is not white or male. >> or the like and your response was to claim that this was somehow racist / >> bigoted by nature... and even more that you think it is against you! For >> others to have what YOU have is, > > Plenty of blacks have what I have, and more. *All* blacks have more > Government-sanctioned privileges than I do, based simply on their being > black. It is written into law that blacks are to receive preferential > treatment just because they are black. You playing victim backs what I am noting. OK. >> to your sick way of thinking, unfair. You think you deserve more >> based on your color or race or religion or sex or whatever. You react with >> anger to the mere idea of equality. > > I think that Government forms should not be allowed to ask for your > race. That in your distorted mind makes me a racist. I never said any such thing. You are, again, making things up. >> And I find that reprehensible. I noted before I do not generally like the >> use of the word "privilege" in such conversations, but you showed the >> concept very well. You think you deserve privileges others do not. > > I think that I deserve fair and equal treatment under the law. You claimed equality was a form of racism against you. Period. > You support something else. I support equality... the best we can do. At times there is no perfect answer, but equality is the goal. You can twist my words all you want -- and you will -- but it comes down to you lashing out with lies because you do not like what you have admitted. > I'm not sure where your confusion started, but it must have happened at some > point during your communist indoctrination. Random insult from you to try to put me on the defensive. >> Why? >> >> Of course you will not answer and will simply lash out with false >> accusations and name calling -- see below for examples: >> >>> You are a brainwashed libtard mush-head who lives in a town with less than 1 >>> percent black population, yet you like to throw around the terms "bigot" and >>> "racist" as if you have the first clue what they mean. Institutional racism >>> exists today, and it is in the form of Government-sanctioned discrimination >>> and hatred focused against white people. >>> >>> http://www.binghamtonreview.com/2016/08/stopwhitepeople2k16-is-an-official-p >>> ar >>> t-of-residential-assistant-training/ > > As expected, you just don't get it. > > Oh, I get it very well that you have gone into attack mode merely because I pointed out a solid, irrefutable fact: I spoke of EQUALITY -- nobody being given privileges based on color or sex or religion or the like and your response was to claim that this was somehow racist / bigoted by nature... and even more that you think it is against you! For others to have what YOU have is, to your sick way of thinking, unfair. You think you deserve more based on your color or race or religion or sex or whatever. You react with anger to the mere idea of equality. And I find that reprehensible. I noted before I do not generally like the use of the word "privilege" in such conversations, but you showed the concept very well. You think you deserve privileges others do not. Why? Of course you will not answer and will simply lash out with false accusations and name calling -- see above for examples. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 13:30 -0700 |
| Subject | An example Owl asked for 2 |
| Message-ID | <D3E4A35B.7A227%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366456 |
On 8/23/16, 9:44 PM, in article fhjavid98983.aji@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/16, 9:10 PM, in article hjgadie892.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/23/16, 8:40 PM, in article hjguasd93.ajifu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>>>>> Find a way to deal with the wealth disadvantage. Institutional >>>>>>> racism against whites is not the answer to the wealth problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> I talk about EQUALITY and you deem that to be racism against whites. >>>>>> >>>>>> For others to have what you have you deem to be agaisnt you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Wow. >>>>> >>>>> You are a BIGOT. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM against >>>>> whites. >>>> >>>> More baseless attacks by you not based on ANY view of mine. Remember: I >>>> spoke of EQUALITY. People being equal... people being judged by the content >>>> of their character. >>>> >>>> You deemed that unfair to YOU. YOU want things to be easier for YOU. >>>> >>>> You want, I suppose the word works: privilege. >>> >>> You are a DEMOCRAT KKK RACIST AshkeNAZI. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM >>> against whites. According to you, wealth means NOTHING. The child of a >>> BLACK NBA PLAYER should be given preferential treatment by the GOVERNMENT >>> over a WHITE child of POVERTY specifically because of his RACE. >>> >> See how you just lash out with anger and humiliation when your own claims >> are pointed out. > > You haven't seen lashing out yet. Wait till I start double-spacing. LOL! You have gone into attack mode merely because I pointed out a solid, irrefutable fact. I spoke of EQUALITY: nobody being given privileges based on color or sex or religion or the like... and your response was to claim that this was somehow racist / bigoted by nature... that you think it is against you. For others to have what YOU have is, to you, unfair. You think you deserve more based on your color or race or religion or sex or whatever. You react with anger to the mere idea of equality. And I find that reprehensible. >> You claim I am racist but give NO example. Remember, I have >> said I support equality... but to you equality IS racist by nature because >> you, used to privilege, > > That right there. "Privilege." That term is RACIST. Of note: I said I was not fond of that word and did not use it until you showed you felt you deserved it... when you showed you thought equality was unfair to YOU. When you said that equality was not good enough for you. That, Owl, is by definition you saying you think you should be privileged. You think you should have more... based on race or color or religion or sex or whatever. I am sure you will not say specifically, but your focus at the time was race. > You assume that just because I am white I come from privilege. I said no such thing... and even rejected the use of the word until you directly noted you felt you should be privileged. > Being white, contrary to your brainwashing, means DISADVANTAGES at the > INSTITUTIONAL level. In a way no evidence shows. Um, whatever. Heck, when you can show that an equal percentage of whites and blacks institutionalized I might even start to consider that whites are treated as poorly on an institutional level. Until then your claim is a complete non-starter. > Not only that, you think that a BLACK child from a > WEALTHY family should be given AFFIRMATIVE ACTION preference over a poor white > soot-faced child from Appalachia just because of his RACE. I never said any such thing. You made that up. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqDVObM1kxc > > >> will end up being treated as an equal. >> >> How can you even begin to justify this? Oh, you cannot... hence why you lash >> out. Interesting conversation... > > Why are you so RACIST against whites? Is it because of the Holohoax? See how you lash out... no evidence of me being racist... esp. against whites. But you are angry, clearly, that you absolute bigotry has been shown. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 13:29 -0700 |
| Subject | An example Owl asked for |
| Message-ID | <D3E4A34A.7A226%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366444 |
On 8/23/16, 9:10 PM, in article hjgadie892.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/16, 8:40 PM, in article hjguasd93.ajifu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >> ... >> >>>>> Find a way to deal with the wealth disadvantage. Institutional >>>>> racism against whites is not the answer to the wealth problem. >>>> >>>> I talk about EQUALITY and you deem that to be racism against whites. >>>> >>>> For others to have what you have you deem to be agaisnt you. >>>> >>>> Wow. >>> >>> You are a BIGOT. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM against >>> whites. >> >> More baseless attacks by you not based on ANY view of mine. Remember: I >> spoke of EQUALITY. People being equal... people being judged by the content >> of their character. >> >> You deemed that unfair to YOU. YOU want things to be easier for YOU. >> >> You want, I suppose the word works: privilege. > > You are a DEMOCRAT KKK RACIST AshkeNAZI. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM > against whites. According to you, wealth means NOTHING. The child of a > BLACK NBA PLAYER should be given preferential treatment by the GOVERNMENT > over a WHITE child of POVERTY specifically because of his RACE. > See how you just lash out with anger and humiliation when your own claims are pointed out. You claim I am racist but give NO example. Remember, I have said I support equality... but to you equality IS racist by nature because you, used to privilege, will end up being treated as an equal. How can you even begin to justify this? Oh, you cannot... hence why you lash out. Interesting conversation... -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 20:33 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: An example Owl asked for |
| Message-ID | <hjguv93.agel32@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366817 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16, 9:10 PM, in article hjgadie892.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/23/16, 8:40 PM, in article hjguasd93.ajifu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> >>>>>> Find a way to deal with the wealth disadvantage. Institutional >>>>>> racism against whites is not the answer to the wealth problem. >>>>> >>>>> I talk about EQUALITY and you deem that to be racism against whites. >>>>> >>>>> For others to have what you have you deem to be agaisnt you. >>>>> >>>>> Wow. >>>> >>>> You are a BIGOT. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM against >>>> whites. >>> >>> More baseless attacks by you not based on ANY view of mine. Remember: I >>> spoke of EQUALITY. People being equal... people being judged by the content >>> of their character. >>> >>> You deemed that unfair to YOU. YOU want things to be easier for YOU. >>> >>> You want, I suppose the word works: privilege. >> >> You are a DEMOCRAT KKK RACIST AshkeNAZI. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM >> against whites. According to you, wealth means NOTHING. The child of a >> BLACK NBA PLAYER should be given preferential treatment by the GOVERNMENT >> over a WHITE child of POVERTY specifically because of his RACE. >> > See how you just lash out with anger and humiliation when your own claims > are pointed out. You claim I am racist but give NO example. Remember, I have > said I support equality... but to you equality IS racist by nature because > you, used to privilege, will end up being treated as an equal. > > How can you even begin to justify this? Oh, you cannot... hence why you lash > out. Interesting conversation... > Your subject change says that this is an "example." What is it an example of?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 13:40 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: An example Owl asked for |
| Message-ID | <D3E4A5BE.7A241%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366825 |
On 8/25/16, 1:33 PM, in article hjguv93.agel32@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/16, 9:10 PM, in article hjgadie892.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/23/16, 8:40 PM, in article hjguasd93.ajifu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>>>>> Find a way to deal with the wealth disadvantage. Institutional >>>>>>> racism against whites is not the answer to the wealth problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> I talk about EQUALITY and you deem that to be racism against whites. >>>>>> >>>>>> For others to have what you have you deem to be agaisnt you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Wow. >>>>> >>>>> You are a BIGOT. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM against >>>>> whites. >>>> >>>> More baseless attacks by you not based on ANY view of mine. Remember: I >>>> spoke of EQUALITY. People being equal... people being judged by the content >>>> of their character. >>>> >>>> You deemed that unfair to YOU. YOU want things to be easier for YOU. >>>> >>>> You want, I suppose the word works: privilege. >>> >>> You are a DEMOCRAT KKK RACIST AshkeNAZI. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM >>> against whites. According to you, wealth means NOTHING. The child of a >>> BLACK NBA PLAYER should be given preferential treatment by the GOVERNMENT >>> over a WHITE child of POVERTY specifically because of his RACE. >>> >> See how you just lash out with anger and humiliation when your own claims >> are pointed out. You claim I am racist but give NO example. Remember, I have >> said I support equality... but to you equality IS racist by nature because >> you, used to privilege, will end up being treated as an equal. >> >> How can you even begin to justify this? Oh, you cannot... hence why you lash >> out. Interesting conversation... >> > > Your subject change says that this is an "example." What is it > an example of? > What you have been asking me to show you an example of! You accuse me of racism because I back equality. NO other reason. Well, above you also assume I am a Democrat (which I am not and would not back the idea of racism) and push the anti-Semitic idea that Ashkenazi Jews must be racist. You are really showing yourself to be a charmer! -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 20:45 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: An example Owl asked for |
| Message-ID | <hjgvxcf.dkog883@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366832 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/25/16, 1:33 PM, in article hjguv93.agel32@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/23/16, 9:10 PM, in article hjgadie892.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/23/16, 8:40 PM, in article hjguasd93.ajifu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>>>>> Find a way to deal with the wealth disadvantage. Institutional >>>>>>>> racism against whites is not the answer to the wealth problem. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I talk about EQUALITY and you deem that to be racism against whites. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For others to have what you have you deem to be agaisnt you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wow. >>>>>> >>>>>> You are a BIGOT. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM against >>>>>> whites. >>>>> >>>>> More baseless attacks by you not based on ANY view of mine. Remember: I >>>>> spoke of EQUALITY. People being equal... people being judged by the content >>>>> of their character. >>>>> >>>>> You deemed that unfair to YOU. YOU want things to be easier for YOU. >>>>> >>>>> You want, I suppose the word works: privilege. >>>> >>>> You are a DEMOCRAT KKK RACIST AshkeNAZI. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM >>>> against whites. According to you, wealth means NOTHING. The child of a >>>> BLACK NBA PLAYER should be given preferential treatment by the GOVERNMENT >>>> over a WHITE child of POVERTY specifically because of his RACE. >>>> >>> See how you just lash out with anger and humiliation when your own claims >>> are pointed out. You claim I am racist but give NO example. Remember, I have >>> said I support equality... but to you equality IS racist by nature because >>> you, used to privilege, will end up being treated as an equal. >>> >>> How can you even begin to justify this? Oh, you cannot... hence why you lash >>> out. Interesting conversation... >>> >> >> Your subject change says that this is an "example." What is it >> an example of? >> > > What you have been asking me to show you an example of! You accuse me of > racism because I back equality. Well I don't see myself anywhere in this post saying what you claim I said. So you lied.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 13:58 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: An example Owl asked for |
| Message-ID | <D3E4A9EE.7A24B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366834 |
On 8/25/16, 1:45 PM, in article hjgvxcf.dkog883@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> See how you just lash out with anger and humiliation when your own claims >>>> are pointed out. You claim I am racist but give NO example. Remember, I >>>> have >>>> said I support equality... but to you equality IS racist by nature because >>>> you, used to privilege, will end up being treated as an equal. >>>> >>>> How can you even begin to justify this? Oh, you cannot... hence why you >>>> lash >>>> out. Interesting conversation... >>>> >>> >>> Your subject change says that this is an "example." What is it >>> an example of? >>> >> >> What you have been asking me to show you an example of! You accuse me of >> racism because I back equality. > > Well I don't see myself anywhere in this post saying what you claim I said. > So you lied. I showed seven examples, NOT including the subject line of your thread where you accuse me of being racist, giving NO evidence other than I back equality. None. All comes down to you think equality is somehow unfair to you... which shows your sense of entitlement and privilege. Why try to make it more complex than that? Why try to bring in a million side issues? Why keep moving goal posts? Seems you are ashamed of your own sense of entitlement and privilege. If so then even you know it is wrong... and that is good. You can work toward changing it. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 21:07 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: An example Owl asked for |
| Message-ID | <hjguv0a3.3afg3@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366838 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/25/16, 1:45 PM, in article hjgvxcf.dkog883@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> See how you just lash out with anger and humiliation when your own claims >>>>> are pointed out. You claim I am racist but give NO example. Remember, I >>>>> have >>>>> said I support equality... but to you equality IS racist by nature because >>>>> you, used to privilege, will end up being treated as an equal. >>>>> >>>>> How can you even begin to justify this? Oh, you cannot... hence why you >>>>> lash >>>>> out. Interesting conversation... >>>>> >>>> >>>> Your subject change says that this is an "example." What is it >>>> an example of? >>>> >>> >>> What you have been asking me to show you an example of! You accuse me of >>> racism because I back equality. >> >> Well I don't see myself anywhere in this post saying what you claim I said. >> So you lied. > > I showed seven examples, NOT including the subject line of your thread where > you accuse me of being racist, giving NO evidence other than I back > equality. > My calling you a racist, and your interpreting what ever else I said to mean that I "called you a racist because you back equality" might speak to your inability to comprehend what you read, but it is NOT a quote of me saying that thing, which is what is required in order for you to prove that I said it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 14:09 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: An example Owl asked for |
| Message-ID | <D3E4ACB5.7A261%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366844 |
On 8/25/16, 2:07 PM, in article hjguv0a3.3afg3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: ... >> I showed seven examples, NOT including the subject line of your thread where >> you accuse me of being racist, giving NO evidence other than I back >> equality. > > My calling you a racist, and your interpreting what ever else I said > to mean that I "called you a racist because you back equality" might > speak to your inability to comprehend what you read, but it is NOT > a quote of me saying that thing, which is what is required in order > for you to prove that I said it. The ONLY thing you based your accusation on was my noting I back equality. Well, you later tried tying it to me having Jewish heritage! That was reprehensible of you as well. More proof of your bigotry. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 09:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npmrug$vpa$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366421 |
On 2016-08-23 7:26 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/16, 3:43 PM, in article hjfua9383.agji@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/23/16, 3:01 PM, in article hgoo9a8f.jai8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>>>> So my noting you know nothing about a topic means, to you, that someone in >>>>>> a >>>>>> video is not qualified to teach. WTF?!?!? >>>>> >>>>> Damn, you are an idiot. You still don't even see what the problem is >>>>> about of. Moron! >>>> >>>> The problem is you are making a bunch of baseless assumptions about a video >>>> we know essentially nothing about. Add to that you keep talking about >>>> teaching but show no expertise on the topic. >>>> >>>> That and people have to pee. That is your big issue. Wow. Tied to you think >>>> you get to define how others see THEMSELVES. >>> >>> That's the gist of it. You don't get to "define" yourself as a man or >>> a woman. You either are one, or you are not. (deformities excepted). >> >> You mean YOU get to define people as YOU wish, but others do not get the >> same rights. This is about YOU. YOU want to control others. >> > > The doctor who delivered me correctly observed me to be male. Oh dear, is Snit defending the idea that men should pee in women's washrooms? Ugh. >> What gives you the right? > > It has nothing to do with "rights". You are either a man or a woman. > Period. (again, excepting deformities). It doesn't matter what you > "identify" as in some mentally ill state of mind. No doubt there > are trannies. They are of course mentally ill. Absolutely. Snit seems to ignore the fact that pedophiles are currently taking advantage of this stupidity to enter women's washrooms and spy on little girls. As long as they tell the authorities that they identify as women, they are defended by not only retarded liberals but by the media. >> What harm does it cause for someone else to pee in >> the same bathroom as you? Why is this even an issue? >> > > I don't personally care who comes in the bathroom I'm in. > I am able to defend myself. But little girls and most > women are not able to defend themselves from predators > who would take advantage of such an open-door policy. Absolutely agreed. < snip redundancy > -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 09:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E46D14.7A144%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366660 |
On 8/25/16, 6:30 AM, in article npmrug$vpa$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: ... >>>> That's the gist of it. You don't get to "define" yourself as a man or >>>> a woman. You either are one, or you are not. (deformities excepted). >>> >>> You mean YOU get to define people as YOU wish, but others do not get the >>> same rights. This is about YOU. YOU want to control others. >>> >> >> The doctor who delivered me correctly observed me to be male. > > Oh dear, is Snit defending the idea that men should pee in women's > washrooms? Ugh. I am defending people's right to pee in a way that is completely non-harmful and non-threatening to you or anyone else. I am advocating freedom and lack of a police state where we have the government dictate minutia. How would one even enforce such a law to stop this... have someone hired to conduct a penis-check at the door of each bathroom? Insist that there be cameras in bathroom stalls? The mind boggles at those who think such things are needed, no less right. >>> What gives you the right? >> >> It has nothing to do with "rights". You are either a man or a woman. >> Period. (again, excepting deformities). It doesn't matter what you >> "identify" as in some mentally ill state of mind. No doubt there >> are trannies. They are of course mentally ill. > > Absolutely. Snit seems to ignore the fact that pedophiles are currently > taking advantage of this stupidity to enter women's washrooms and spy on > little girls. As long as they tell the authorities that they identify as > women, they are defended by not only retarded liberals but by the media. I am not in any way defending pedophiles - nor are the relevant to this discussion. Heck, and why bring up the concern now in relation to girls and not boys? It is a side issue that is brought up to try to control people who are not in any way harming you or others. Note I have repeatedly spoken of people who are NOT harming others in any way... and you move the topic to pedophiles. They ARE harming people (at least those that act on such impulses). To suggest otherwise is absurd. >>> What harm does it cause for someone else to pee in >>> the same bathroom as you? Why is this even an issue? >>> >> >> I don't personally care who comes in the bathroom I'm in. >> I am able to defend myself. But little girls and most >> women are not able to defend themselves from predators >> who would take advantage of such an open-door policy. > > Absolutely agreed. And little boys are? And men are? What? And from whom... remember, the topic is about people peeing... not people harming others. I think we all agree such harm is wrong. > < snip redundancy > -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 09:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npmrp2$vpa$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366415 |
On 2016-08-23 6:43 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/16, 3:01 PM, in article hgoo9a8f.jai8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >> ... >>>> So my noting you know nothing about a topic means, to you, that someone in a >>>> video is not qualified to teach. WTF?!?!? >>> >>> Damn, you are an idiot. You still don't even see what the problem is >>> about of. Moron! >> >> The problem is you are making a bunch of baseless assumptions about a video >> we know essentially nothing about. Add to that you keep talking about >> teaching but show no expertise on the topic. >> >> That and people have to pee. That is your big issue. Wow. Tied to you think >> you get to define how others see THEMSELVES. > > That's the gist of it. You don't get to "define" yourself as a man or > a woman. You either are one, or you are not. (deformities excepted). > > Here's how a bathroom trip should go. > You walk up to the two doors. One says "Men" or has a man icon. > The other says "Women" or has a woman icon. If you have ever seen your > pecker/hoohoo, then you know which door to open. > > >> All about YOU having control of >> the world. Then you whine about others having the audacity to think THEY >> should be able to think for themselves. The nerve! >> >> Oh, and you are offended that some people are easily offended... which is >> ironic in a way you show no understanding of. :) >> > > I love it when people are easily offended. > >> ... >>>>>>> Love the murderous jihadis. >>>>>> >>>>>> Other than being based on you grouping all Muslims based on your bigotry >>>>>> what are you even talking about? >>>>> >>>>> I say "jihadis" and you hear "Muslim." Who's the bigot here again? >>>> >>>> Who the hell are you talking about then? >>> >>> That's right. Double-down on that bigotry. >> >> You snipped... and refuse to say what you were talking about. Again: if you >> are willing to say you did NOT mean Muslims as a whole and do not think >> Islam is an issue I am happy to take back my comment and apologize. >> > > Why apologize to me? I'm not a moslem. Maybe you should volunteer > for some community service. Or just accept the sharia punishment > for insulting the prophet (piss be upon him). Piss wouldn't be enough. Muhammad (steaming excrement be upon his head) was a murderous pedophile and is somehow used as an "example to follow" for sand parasites in general but Sharia proponents especially. < snip > >> Ah, so you do not understand the issues involving police. Got it. >> > > I understand that whites are killed by police at a higher rate > than blacks. Where's the WLM? Oh, right, that would be racist. Statistics support your statement. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 09:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E46BE1.7A132%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366658 |
On 8/25/16, 6:28 AM, in article npmrp2$vpa$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> You snipped... and refuse to say what you were talking about. Again: if you >>> are willing to say you did NOT mean Muslims as a whole and do not think >>> Islam is an issue I am happy to take back my comment and apologize. >>> >> >> Why apologize to me? I'm not a moslem. Maybe you should volunteer >> for some community service. Or just accept the sharia punishment >> for insulting the prophet (piss be upon him). > > Piss wouldn't be enough. Muhammad (steaming excrement be upon his head) > was a murderous pedophile and is somehow used as an "example to follow" > for sand parasites in general but Sharia proponents especially. Meanwhile many Christians follow the Bible... as an outsider looking at these groups it is astonishing. > < snip > > >>> Ah, so you do not understand the issues involving police. Got it. >>> >> >> I understand that whites are killed by police at a higher rate >> than blacks. Where's the WLM? Oh, right, that would be racist. > > Statistics support your statement. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web