Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366818

An example Owl asked for 2

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject An example Owl asked for 2
Date 2016-08-25 13:30 -0700
Message-ID <D3E4A35B.7A227%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References (9 earlier) <hjguasd93.ajifu@perch.invalid> <D3E266A3.79EBD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <hjgadie892.a@perch.invalid> <D3E270A8.79EC3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <fhjavid98983.aji@perch.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw

On 8/23/16, 9:44 PM, in article fhjavid98983.aji@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 8/23/16, 9:10 PM, in article hjgadie892.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> On 8/23/16, 8:40 PM, in article hjguasd93.ajifu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> ...
>>>> 
>>>>>>> Find a way to deal with the wealth disadvantage.  Institutional
>>>>>>> racism against whites is not the answer to the wealth problem.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I talk about EQUALITY and you deem that to be racism against whites.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> For others to have what you have you deem to be agaisnt you.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Wow.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You are a BIGOT.  You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM against
>>>>> whites. 
>>>> 
>>>> More baseless attacks by you not based on ANY view of mine. Remember: I
>>>> spoke of EQUALITY. People being equal... people being judged by the content
>>>> of their character.
>>>> 
>>>> You deemed that unfair to YOU. YOU want things to be easier for YOU.
>>>> 
>>>> You want, I suppose the word works: privilege.
>>> 
>>> You are a DEMOCRAT KKK RACIST AshkeNAZI.  You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM
>>> against whites.  According to you, wealth means NOTHING.  The child of a
>>> BLACK NBA PLAYER should be given preferential treatment by the GOVERNMENT
>>> over a WHITE child of POVERTY specifically because of his RACE.
>>> 
>> See how you just lash out with anger and humiliation when your own claims
>> are pointed out.
> 
> You haven't seen lashing out yet.  Wait till I start double-spacing.

LOL! You have gone into attack mode merely because I pointed out a solid,
irrefutable fact.

I spoke of EQUALITY: nobody being given privileges based on color or sex or
religion or the like... and your response was to claim that this was somehow
racist / bigoted by nature... that you think it is against you. For others
to have what YOU have is, to you, unfair. You think you deserve more based
on your color or race or religion or sex or whatever. You react with anger
to the mere idea of equality.

And I find that reprehensible.

>> You claim I am racist but give NO example. Remember, I have
>> said I support equality... but to you equality IS racist by nature because
>> you, used to privilege,
> 
> That right there.  "Privilege."  That term is RACIST.

Of note: I said I was not fond of that word and did not use it until you
showed you felt you deserved it... when you showed you thought equality was
unfair to YOU. When you said that equality was not good enough for you.
That, Owl, is by definition you saying you think you should be privileged.
You think you should have more... based on race or color or religion or sex
or whatever. I am sure you will not say specifically, but your focus at the
time was race.

> You assume that just because I am white I come from privilege.

I said no such thing... and even rejected the use of the word until you
directly noted you felt you should be privileged.

> Being white, contrary to your brainwashing, means DISADVANTAGES at the
> INSTITUTIONAL level.

In a way no evidence shows. Um, whatever. Heck, when you can show that an
equal percentage of whites and blacks institutionalized I might even start
to consider that whites are treated as poorly on an institutional level.
Until then your claim is a complete non-starter.

> Not only that, you think that a BLACK child from a
> WEALTHY family should be given AFFIRMATIVE ACTION preference over a poor white
> soot-faced child from Appalachia just because of his RACE.

I never said any such thing. You made that up.

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqDVObM1kxc
> 
> 
>> will end up being treated as an equal.
>> 
>> How can you even begin to justify this? Oh, you cannot... hence why you lash
>> out. Interesting conversation...
> 
> Why are you so RACIST against whites?  Is it because of the Holohoax?

See how you lash out... no evidence of me being racist... esp. against
whites. But you are angry, clearly, that you absolute bigotry has been
shown. 


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:51 +0000
  Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:18 -0700
    Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 18:32 +0000
      Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:43 -0700
        Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 19:13 +0000
          Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 12:29 -0700
            Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 19:53 +0000
              Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 13:07 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 20:33 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 13:41 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 21:01 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 14:14 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:01 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:12 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:43 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:50 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 23:26 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 16:57 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:41 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 18:56 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 03:16 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 20:23 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 03:40 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 20:46 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 04:10 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:29 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 04:44 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 07:56 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:45 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:49 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 16:00 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:15 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 16:42 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:50 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 17:58 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:12 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 18:54 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 12:06 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:25 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 12:41 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:55 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:13 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:29 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:34 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:50 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:55 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:59 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:02 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:09 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:14 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:27 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:32 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:47 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:56 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 23:51 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:00 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:28 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:32 -0700
                An example Owl asked for 5 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
                Re: An example Owl asked for 5 "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:38 +0000
                Re: An example Owl asked for 5 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:59 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 15:04 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 00:00 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:03 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:28 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:33 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:52 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 19:01 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 02:49 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:06 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:27 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:24 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:21 -0600
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:51 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:27 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:23 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-25 07:04 -0400
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:56 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 19:03 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:00 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:19 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:32 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:25 -0700
                An example Owl asked for 6 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
                Re: An example Owl asked for 6 "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:39 +0000
                Re: An example Owl asked for 6 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:58 -0700
                An example Owl asked for 4 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
                An example Owl asked for 3 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:30 -0700
                An example Owl asked for 2 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:30 -0700
                An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:29 -0700
                Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:33 +0000
                Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:40 -0700
                Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:45 +0000
                Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:58 -0700
                Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 21:07 +0000
                Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:09 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:30 -0400
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:38 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:28 -0400
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:33 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 09:44 -0700
              Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:19 -0400
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:32 -0700
          Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:16 -0400
            Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:31 -0700
              Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 09:42 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 13:05 -0400
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:17 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 11:06 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:51 -0400
                Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 12:56 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 16:54 -0400
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:00 -0700

csiph-web