Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #156777 > unrolled thread
| Started by | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-01-08 09:52 +0000 |
| Last post | 2013-01-13 12:45 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 22 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-08 09:52 +0000
Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns spike1@freenet.co.uk - 2013-01-08 10:29 +0000
Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2013-01-08 08:05 -0500
Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-01-08 08:29 -0500
Re: Pierce Morgan on guns Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2013-01-09 14:29 +0000
Re: Pierce Morgan on guns chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-01-09 08:40 -0600
Re: Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-09 20:06 +0000
Re: Pierce Morgan on guns Big Steel <ZekeGregory222222@netscape222222.net> - 2013-01-09 16:34 -0500
Re: Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-09 21:45 +0000
Re: Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-09 21:44 +0000
Re: Pierce Morgan on guns Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-01-09 07:52 -0800
Re: Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-09 20:04 +0000
Re: Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-09 20:15 +0000
Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-09 20:11 +0000
Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns "Phil Da Lick!" <phil_the_lick@SPAMMERSKISSMYARSE.hotmail.com> - 2013-01-08 11:08 +0000
Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-09 20:08 +0000
Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-01-09 07:52 -0800
Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-09 20:07 +0000
Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-01-09 12:21 -0800
Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-09 20:32 +0000
Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns Nobody <invalid@invalid.com> - 2013-01-13 03:30 -0600
Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-13 12:45 +0000
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-08 09:52 +0000 |
| Subject | Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns |
| Message-ID | <eut84.a0r@rooftop.invalid> |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVXx-NejsK8 <quote> manny123041 26 minutes ago Piss off you pompous Brit wanker piece of shit. Our Constitution is what gave us our government that let us pull away from a shit hole country that is England. Imperialist pieces of shit. Go stick your shit stained nose in some other countries business, Oh wait here is an idea Worry about your miserable economy. Don't worry about our rights and what you believe we should do with our guns. </quote> 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/deport-british-citizen-piers-morgan-attacking-2nd-amendment/prfh5zHD
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | spike1@freenet.co.uk |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-08 10:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <r09tr9-q7h.ln1@librarian.sky.com> |
| In reply to | #156777 |
And verily, didst owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> hastily babble thusly: > 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat: 100% of brits want him to stay exactly where he is. -- | spike1@freenet.co.uk | | | Andrew Halliwell BSc | "ARSE! GERLS!! DRINK! DRINK! DRINK!!!" | | in | "THAT WOULD BE AN ECUMENICAL MATTER!...FECK!!!! | | Computer Science | - Father Jack in "Father Ted" |
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-08 08:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kch5i6$kni$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #156783 |
On 1/8/2013 5:29 AM, spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote: > And verily, didst owl<owl@rooftop.invalid> hastily babble thusly: >> >105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat: > 100% of brits want him to stay exactly where he is. > > -- | spike1@freenet.co.uk | | | Andrew Halliwell BSc | "ARSE! GERLS!! > DRINK! DRINK! DRINK!!!" | | in | "THAT WOULD BE AN ECUMENICAL > MATTER!...FECK!!!! | | Computer Science | - Father Jack in "Father Ted" | You have a BSc in Computer Science?!?!?! Just so you could be on the dole for half your life?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-08 08:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1rmnccoj33mru.1fjszgn8s3vfg.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #156783 |
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:29:15 +0000, spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote: > And verily, didst owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> hastily babble thusly: >> 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat: > > 100% of brits want him to stay exactly where he is. lol ! -- flatfish+++ PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS: http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Homer <usenet@slated.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-09 14:29 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Pierce Morgan on guns |
| Message-ID | <ffb0s9-9qr.ln1@sky.matrix> |
| In reply to | #156783 |
Verily I say unto thee that spike1@freenet.co.uk spake thusly: > And verily, didst owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> hastily babble thusly: >> >> 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat: > > 100% of brits want him to stay exactly where he is. With any luck he'll do the same thing to the American gun lobby that he did to the British "music" industry. -- K. | "You see? You cannot kill me. There is no flesh http://slated.org | and blood within this cloak to kill. There is Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on šky | only an idea. And ideas are bulletproof." kernel 2.6.31.5, up 77 days | ~ V for Vendetta.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-09 08:40 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Pierce Morgan on guns |
| Message-ID | <h80re8d1cig9r5r7332hblu1uh4h1kebl0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #157018 |
>> owl wrote: >>> >>> 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat: Bigotry documented.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-09 20:06 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Pierce Morgan on guns |
| Message-ID | <rye8.39px5@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #157023 |
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> owl wrote: > >>> > >>> 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat: > Bigotry documented. Next you can document my nuts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Steel <ZekeGregory222222@netscape222222.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-09 16:34 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Pierce Morgan on guns |
| Message-ID | <pcKdnVELt_jof3DNnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #157084 |
On 1/9/2013 4:26 PM, DFS wrote: > On 1/9/2013 3:06 PM, owl wrote: >> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> owl wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat: >> >>> Bigotry documented. >> >> Next you can document my nuts. > > > chrisv would enjoy the texture more than the taste... > Hey big daddy, you shouldn't slurp him too hard, because you might hurt him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-09 21:45 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Pierce Morgan on guns |
| Message-ID | <rhue83.t8@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #157127 |
Big Steel <ZekeGregory222222@netscape222222.net> wrote: > On 1/9/2013 4:26 PM, DFS wrote: > > On 1/9/2013 3:06 PM, owl wrote: > >> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> owl wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat: > >> > >>> Bigotry documented. > >> > >> Next you can document my nuts. > > > > > > chrisv would enjoy the texture more than the taste... > > > Hey big daddy, you shouldn't slurp him too hard, because you might hurt > him. And along comes Super Fly, right on cue. LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-09 21:44 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Pierce Morgan on guns |
| Message-ID | <trye8.3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #157084 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 1/9/2013 3:06 PM, owl wrote: > > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>> owl wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat: > > > >> Bigotry documented. > > > > Next you can document my nuts. > chrisv would enjoy the texture more than the taste... The documented liar chrisv would just lie about it though.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-09 07:52 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Pierce Morgan on guns |
| Message-ID | <e28ee7d4-c06d-4a6d-ad1c-1f3765fe840d@j4g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #157018 |
On Jan 9, 7:29 am, Homer <use...@slated.org> wrote: > Verily I say unto thee that spi...@freenet.co.uk spake thusly: > > > And verily, didst owl <o...@rooftop.invalid> hastily babble thusly: > > >> 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat: > > > 100% of brits want him to stay exactly where he is. > > With any luck he'll do the same thing to the American gun lobby that he > did to the British "music" industry. Steal early American Blues?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-09 20:04 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Pierce Morgan on guns |
| Message-ID | <eytr83.39@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #157018 |
Homer <usenet@slated.org> wrote: > Verily I say unto thee that spike1@freenet.co.uk spake thusly: > > And verily, didst owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> hastily babble thusly: > >> > >> 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat: > > > > 100% of brits want him to stay exactly where he is. > With any luck he'll do the same thing to the American gun lobby that he > did to the British "music" industry. I read that the Queen can legally dissolve Parliament. What a joke the UK is. Bunch of faggots sipping tea with their pinky in air. Too bad you fags don't have the constitutional *right* to bear arms. At least you have a violent crime rate that is twice that of the US, so you do beat the US at something.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-09 20:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Pierce Morgan on guns |
| Message-ID | <ehru3.er9@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #157018 |
Homer <usenet@slated.org> wrote: > Verily I say unto thee that spike1@freenet.co.uk spake thusly: > > And verily, didst owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> hastily babble thusly: > >> > >> 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat: > > > > 100% of brits want him to stay exactly where he is. > With any luck he'll do the same thing to the American gun lobby that he > did to the British "music" industry. Oh and by the way, learn how to post to usenet, you fucktard. You don't get to change the subject line just because it offends your girlie sensibilities.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-09 20:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <eyr8305.p@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #156783 |
spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote: > And verily, didst owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> hastily babble thusly: > > 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat: > 100% of brits want him to stay exactly where he is. Everybody hates his ass over here. I read that his ratings are so low that not only does he get beat by his Fox News competition in his time slot (9-10 pm), but that the 3 am repeat of that same Fox show also beats his prime time numbers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Phil Da Lick!" <phil_the_lick@SPAMMERSKISSMYARSE.hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-08 11:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <SaydnTdmttS7Y3bNnZ2dnUVZ8t-dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #156777 |
On 08/01/2013 09:52, owl wrote: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVXx-NejsK8 > <quote> > manny123041 26 minutes ago > > Piss off you pompous Brit wanker piece of shit. Our Constitution is > what gave us our government that let us pull away from a shit hole > country that is England. Imperialist pieces of shit. Go stick your shit > stained nose in some other countries business, Oh wait here is an idea > Worry about your miserable economy. Don't worry about our rights and > what you believe we should do with our guns. > > </quote> > > 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat: > https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/deport-british-citizen-piers-morgan-attacking-2nd-amendment/prfh5zHD > Well part of me thinks that as a resident of the US he is entitled to his opinion. The overall majority of me though is glad that annoying pompous prick is now a resident of the US. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-09 20:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kpeyr83.39@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #156784 |
Phil Da Lick! <phil_the_lick@spammerskissmyarse.hotmail.com> wrote: > On 08/01/2013 09:52, owl wrote: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVXx-NejsK8 > > <quote> > > manny123041 26 minutes ago > > > > Piss off you pompous Brit wanker piece of shit. Our Constitution is > > what gave us our government that let us pull away from a shit hole > > country that is England. Imperialist pieces of shit. Go stick your shit > > stained nose in some other countries business, Oh wait here is an idea > > Worry about your miserable economy. Don't worry about our rights and > > what you believe we should do with our guns. > > > > </quote> > > > > 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat: > > https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/deport-british-citizen-piers-morgan-attacking-2nd-amendment/prfh5zHD > > > Well part of me thinks that as a resident of the US he is entitled to > his opinion. The overall majority of me though is glad that annoying > pompous prick is now a resident of the US. :) Did he always slobber so much when he talks? I can barely understand what the fucker is saying when he gets riled up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-09 07:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <588eb4fe-478f-407e-9596-f8b59588e750@u19g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #156777 |
On Jan 8, 2:52 am, owl <o...@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVXx-NejsK8 > <quote> > manny123041 26 minutes ago > > Piss off you pompous Brit wanker piece of shit. Our Constitution is > what gave us our government that let us pull away from a shit hole > country that is England. Imperialist pieces of shit. Go stick your shit > stained nose in some other countries business, Oh wait here is an idea > Worry about your miserable economy. Don't worry about our rights and > what you believe we should do with our guns. > > </quote> > > 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat:https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/deport-british-citizen-pier... Interesting that Piers is asking about dealing with the divide over how the 2nd amendment is "interpreted". Anyone with a passing glint of historical perspective knows Ice T's "interpretation" is factual and the other side of the divide (duck hunting or no guns at all) fantasy. Here's an over zealous (almost mouth foaming;) interviewee with Piers where Piers is putting up, what I believe to be, a bogus premise... that of 35 gun deaths vs thousand. I say it's bogus because it doesn't look at the real comparison (which is the very reason the 2nd amendment exists), that being, the tens or hundreds of millions of gun deaths by tyrannical government vs gun death numbers in the U.S. (which often misstated by including suicide and gang on gang violence to a high percentage). I don't think we should look at changing anything without looking at the drugs we are prescribing. Personally, I don't see the need for war type weapons to be available to the general population. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtyKofFih8Y
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-09 20:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <eyr83033.30@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #157041 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 8, 2:52 am, owl <o...@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVXx-NejsK8 > > <quote> > > manny123041 26 minutes ago > > > > Piss off you pompous Brit wanker piece of shit. Our Constitution is > > what gave us our government that let us pull away from a shit hole > > country that is England. Imperialist pieces of shit. Go stick your shit > > stained nose in some other countries business, Oh wait here is an idea > > Worry about your miserable economy. Don't worry about our rights and > > what you believe we should do with our guns. > > > > </quote> > > > > 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat:https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/deport-british-citizen-pier... > Interesting that Piers is asking about dealing with the divide over > how the 2nd amendment is "interpreted". Anyone with a passing glint of > historical perspective knows Ice T's "interpretation" is factual and > the other side of the divide (duck hunting or no guns at all) fantasy. > Here's an over zealous (almost mouth foaming;) interviewee with Piers > where Piers is putting up, what I believe to be, a bogus premise... > that of 35 gun deaths vs thousand. I say it's bogus because it > doesn't look at the real comparison (which is the very reason the 2nd > amendment exists), that being, the tens or hundreds of millions of gun > deaths by tyrannical government vs gun death numbers in the U.S. > (which often misstated by including suicide and gang on gang violence > to a high percentage). I don't think we should look at changing > anything without looking at the drugs we are prescribing. Personally, > I don't see the need for war type weapons to be available to the > general population. > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtyKofFih8Y We need "war type weapons" so we can wage war.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-09 12:21 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3f4647ae-15c0-4770-bc81-65e967b1946e@y5g2000pbi.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #157041 |
On Jan 9, 8:52 am, Steve Carroll <fretwiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 8, 2:52 am, owl <o...@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVXx-NejsK8 > > <quote> > > manny123041 26 minutes ago > > > Piss off you pompous Brit wanker piece of shit. Our Constitution is > > what gave us our government that let us pull away from a shit hole > > country that is England. Imperialist pieces of shit. Go stick your shit > > stained nose in some other countries business, Oh wait here is an idea > > Worry about your miserable economy. Don't worry about our rights and > > what you believe we should do with our guns. > > > </quote> > > > 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat:https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/deport-british-citizen-pier... > > Interesting that Piers is asking about dealing with the divide over > how the 2nd amendment is "interpreted". Anyone with a passing glint of > historical perspective knows Ice T's "interpretation" is factual and > the other side of the divide (duck hunting or no guns at all) fantasy. > Here's an over zealous (almost mouth foaming;) interviewee with Piers > where Piers is putting up, what I believe to be, a bogus premise... > that of 35 gun deaths vs thousand. I say it's bogus because it > doesn't look at the real comparison (which is the very reason the 2nd > amendment exists), that being, the tens or hundreds of millions of gun > deaths by tyrannical government vs gun death numbers in the U.S. > (which often misstated by including suicide and gang on gang violence > to a high percentage). I don't think we should look at changing > anything without looking at the drugs we are prescribing. Personally, > I don't see the need for war type weapons to be available to the > general population. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtyKofFih8Y For informational purposes, that last statement I made was to contrast statements made by certain people who have stated their belief that the right to own a weapon as powerful as a nuclear bomb is granted to them by the U.S. Constitution: "The Constitution tells me I have the right to bear arms. Even if nukes were weapons, I must be able to own them, as the Constitution tells me so." https://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ba4b4236411479a5 Of course, the rest of us realize that the U.S. Constitution is a framework (which doesn't mention many things, nukes included) for which certain "rights" are denied (for practical purposes) via subsequent legislation. (cue up whining that the above quote was 'sarcasm', 'taken out of context', a 'joke', a 'typo' or some other kind of 'mistake') I'm sure it's obvious who wrote that quote ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-09 20:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e7ri3pwp.3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #157091 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 9, 8:52 am, Steve Carroll <fretwiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jan 8, 2:52 am, owl <o...@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVXx-NejsK8 > > > <quote> > > > manny123041 26 minutes ago > > > > > Piss off you pompous Brit wanker piece of shit. Our Constitution is > > > what gave us our government that let us pull away from a shit hole > > > country that is England. Imperialist pieces of shit. Go stick your shit > > > stained nose in some other countries business, Oh wait here is an idea > > > Worry about your miserable economy. Don't worry about our rights and > > > what you believe we should do with our guns. > > > > > </quote> > > > > > 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat:https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/deport-british-citizen-pier... > > > > Interesting that Piers is asking about dealing with the divide over > > how the 2nd amendment is "interpreted". Anyone with a passing glint of > > historical perspective knows Ice T's "interpretation" is factual and > > the other side of the divide (duck hunting or no guns at all) fantasy. > > Here's an over zealous (almost mouth foaming;) interviewee with Piers > > where Piers is putting up, what I believe to be, a bogus premise... > > that of 35 gun deaths vs thousand. I say it's bogus because it > > doesn't look at the real comparison (which is the very reason the 2nd > > amendment exists), that being, the tens or hundreds of millions of gun > > deaths by tyrannical government vs gun death numbers in the U.S. > > (which often misstated by including suicide and gang on gang violence > > to a high percentage). I don't think we should look at changing > > anything without looking at the drugs we are prescribing. Personally, > > I don't see the need for war type weapons to be available to the > > general population. > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtyKofFih8Y > For informational purposes, that last statement I made was to contrast > statements made by certain people who have stated their belief that > the right to own a weapon as powerful as a nuclear bomb is granted to > them by the U.S. Constitution: > "The Constitution tells me I have the right to bear arms. Even if > nukes were weapons, I must be able to own them, as the Constitution > tells me so." > https://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ba4b4236411479a5 > Of course, the rest of us realize that the U.S. Constitution is a > framework (which doesn't mention many things, nukes included) for > which certain "rights" are denied (for practical purposes) via > subsequent legislation. > (cue up whining that the above quote was 'sarcasm', 'taken out of > context', a 'joke', a 'typo' or some other kind of 'mistake') > I'm sure it's obvious who wrote that quote ;) For me, it means any weapon that an infantry soldier might be expected to carry into battle.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web