Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #157097

Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns

Show all headers | View raw

Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 9, 8:52 am, Steve Carroll <fretwiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 8, 2:52 am, owl <o...@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVXx-NejsK8
> > > <quote>
> > > manny123041 26 minutes ago
> >
> > > Piss off you pompous Brit wanker piece of shit. Our Constitution is
> > > what gave us our government that let us pull away from a shit hole
> > > country that is England. Imperialist pieces of shit. Go stick your shit
> > > stained nose in some other countries business, Oh wait here is an idea
> > > Worry about your miserable economy. Don't worry about our rights and
> > > what you believe we should do with our guns.
> >
> > > </quote>
> >
> > > 105,785 now want this faggot to get on a boat:https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/deport-british-citizen-pier...
> >
> > Interesting that Piers is asking about dealing with the divide over
> > how the 2nd amendment is "interpreted". Anyone with a passing glint of
> > historical perspective knows Ice T's "interpretation" is factual and
> > the other side of the divide (duck hunting or no guns at all) fantasy.
> > Here's an over zealous (almost mouth foaming;) interviewee with Piers
> > where Piers is putting up, what I believe to be, a bogus premise...
> > that of 35 gun deaths vs  thousand. I say it's bogus because it
> > doesn't look at the real comparison (which is the very reason the 2nd
> > amendment exists), that being, the tens or hundreds of millions of gun
> > deaths by tyrannical government vs gun death numbers in the U.S.
> > (which often misstated by including suicide and gang on gang violence
> > to a high percentage). I don't think we should look at changing
> > anything without looking at the drugs we are prescribing. Personally,
> > I don't see the need for war type weapons to be available to the
> > general population.
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtyKofFih8Y

> For informational purposes, that last statement I made was to contrast
> statements made by certain people who have stated their belief that
> the right to own a weapon as powerful as a nuclear bomb is granted to
> them by the U.S. Constitution:

> "The Constitution tells me I have the right to bear arms.  Even if
> nukes were weapons, I must be able to own them, as the Constitution
> tells me so."

> https://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ba4b4236411479a5

> Of course, the rest of us realize that the U.S. Constitution is a
> framework (which doesn't mention many things, nukes included) for
> which certain "rights" are denied (for practical purposes) via
> subsequent legislation.

> (cue up whining that the above quote was 'sarcasm',  'taken out of
> context', a 'joke', a 'typo' or some other kind of 'mistake')

> I'm sure it's obvious who wrote that quote ;)

For me, it means any weapon that an infantry soldier might be expected
to carry into battle.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-08 09:52 +0000
  Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns spike1@freenet.co.uk - 2013-01-08 10:29 +0000
    Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2013-01-08 08:05 -0500
    Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-01-08 08:29 -0500
    Re: Pierce Morgan on guns Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2013-01-09 14:29 +0000
      Re: Pierce Morgan on guns chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-01-09 08:40 -0600
        Re: Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-09 20:06 +0000
          Re: Pierce Morgan on guns Big Steel <ZekeGregory222222@netscape222222.net> - 2013-01-09 16:34 -0500
            Re: Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-09 21:45 +0000
          Re: Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-09 21:44 +0000
      Re: Pierce Morgan on guns Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-01-09 07:52 -0800
      Re: Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-09 20:04 +0000
      Re: Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-09 20:15 +0000
    Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-09 20:11 +0000
  Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns "Phil Da Lick!" <phil_the_lick@SPAMMERSKISSMYARSE.hotmail.com> - 2013-01-08 11:08 +0000
    Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-09 20:08 +0000
  Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-01-09 07:52 -0800
    Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-09 20:07 +0000
    Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-01-09 12:21 -0800
      Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-09 20:32 +0000
  Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns Nobody <invalid@invalid.com> - 2013-01-13 03:30 -0600
    Re: Fat British girl Pierce Morgan on guns owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-13 12:45 +0000

csiph-web