Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #486886 > unrolled thread
| Started by | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-06 22:16 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-02-12 09:26 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 117 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-02-06 22:16 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-02-06 15:03 -0800
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-08 07:40 -0600
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-08 14:49 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-08 10:28 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-08 17:56 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-08 13:19 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-08 13:32 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-08 12:35 -0600
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:23 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-08 13:00 -0600
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-09 03:21 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 18:55 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:29 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 18:54 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:34 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? tom <tom@0.0.0.0> - 2019-02-09 20:23 -0800
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-10 19:34 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 01:06 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-03-14 04:39 +0000
When I see "malware", the phrase "clueless idiot" pops into my head. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-03-13 21:49 -0700
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? tom <tom@0.0.0.0> - 2019-02-09 20:22 -0800
Please kill yourself on the way out of the door Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:46 -0800
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-10 15:02 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2019-02-10 21:32 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 21:48 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-10 23:04 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 23:15 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-10 23:23 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 23:37 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-10 23:39 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 23:50 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 00:29 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 01:01 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 10:24 +0100
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 03:44 -0800
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 13:26 +0100
To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-11 04:46 -0800
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-11 10:41 -0500
Re: π«π«π«β° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! β°π«π«π« Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" π«π«π«β° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! β°π«π«π«β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 09:57 -0600
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 10:29 -0600
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 10:38 -0600
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 11:08 -0600
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-02-11 13:22 -0500
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 12:56 -0600
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 16:44 +0000
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 09:11 -0800
Re: β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 12:59 -0600
Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-11 12:10 -0700
Re: β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 13:20 -0600
Re: β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 12:22 -0700
Re: Re: β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 14:51 -0600
Re: β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 13:55 -0700
Re: Re: β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 14:59 -0600
Re: β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 15:35 -0600
Re: Re: β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-12 10:56 -0600
Re: β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. β Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake ββ Snowflake β Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-12 11:12 -0600
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 09:41 -0600
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 13:47 -0500
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 13:04 -0800
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 15:39 -0600
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 17:56 +0000
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 13:03 -0800
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 15:53 -0600
To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-11 13:57 -0800
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 15:03 -0700
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 22:03 +0000
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 17:07 -0600
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 15:38 -0800
Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 17:14 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 06:10 -0800
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 16:38 +0100
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 10:39 -0800
*You* can't, I can. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-11 14:00 -0800
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 13:50 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-10 19:36 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 01:12 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-03-14 19:05 -0400
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 07:11 -0600
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 06:35 -0800
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-08 18:53 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-08 14:26 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-08 19:59 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-09 03:26 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 19:00 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 18:59 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-09 19:58 -0800
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 07:17 -0600
Signatures are for posts with ZERO informational content Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 05:27 -0800
Re: Signatures are for posts with ZERO informational content chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 07:33 -0600
A person could actually grow old waiting to be enlighten on COLA about Linux. Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 05:36 -0800
Re: A person could actually grow old waiting to be enlighten on COLA about Linux. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-11 13:52 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 06:12 -0800
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 08:33 -0600
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-10 12:23 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-09 21:54 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2019-02-10 14:16 +0000
Russell's shitty attitude is the PROBLEM, rather than the solution Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 06:29 -0800
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:36 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-09 22:03 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 14:52 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-10 13:14 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 18:18 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2019-02-23 14:59 +0000
There is stupid, then there is vallor stupid Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-09 05:25 -0800
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 18:48 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:40 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-10 19:31 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 01:05 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-09 21:47 -0500
The Linux Advocates on COLA are total ass-holes Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:51 -0800
Re: The Linux Advocates on COLA are total ass-holes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-10 08:13 -0500
Time to drop a MOAB on COLA Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 04:52 -0800
Re: The Linux Advocates on COLA are total ass-holes Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2019-02-16 02:41 +0000
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-11 14:47 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-11 14:49 -0500
Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-02-12 09:26 +0000
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-06 22:16 +0000 |
| Subject | Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? |
| Message-ID | <gc14mrFrsg8U2@mid.individual.net> |
Mr. Ahlstrom said the group was moribund. Not quite, but close. I'm sitting here at my Linux desktop at my Linux job doing Linux things, and I don't have anything to say about it except that it is happening. "But you use Windows in your company!" So? That's what our customer's use, so why wouldn't customer-facing technicians and support personnel use the same environment? Even so, operations folks -- systems and networking -- are as likely as not to be using a Linux desktop. And for those who don't, it would be surprising for them not to be running Linux in a virt, or even with the Windows Subsystem for Linux. As if that mattered: this isn't comp.os.linux.desktop, it is comp.os.linux.advocacy. So why would we not tout its strengths, rather than its weaknesses? Linux is strong on servers. Very strong. One can do exciting things with it. Trolls don't want to talk about that. So, let's talk about that. ;) So a few months ago, I finished a shell server for our customers where each customer lives in their own chroot _and_ all their directory shares are mounted using sshfs. That was an interesting project. Not sure how I would even approach that with Windows, even if there was a solid concept of a "shell user" on Windows. (I guess that would be more of a "remote desktop user" type situation with Cytrix? Or powershell over sshd? Beats me.) -- -v
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-06 15:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6bb616a6-1b67-47da-9d56-ee24c14b6197@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #486886 |
On Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 3:17:02 PM UTC-7, vallor wrote: > Mr. Ahlstrom said the group was moribund. Not quite, but close. It's pretty damn close ;) > I'm sitting here at my Linux desktop at my Linux job doing Linux things, > and I don't have anything to say about it except that it is happening. > > "But you use Windows in your company!" > > So? That's what our customer's use, so why wouldn't customer-facing > technicians and support personnel use the same environment? > > Even so, operations folks -- systems and networking -- are as likely as > not to be using a Linux desktop. And for those who don't, it would be > surprising for them not to be running Linux in a virt, or even with the > Windows Subsystem for Linux. > > As if that mattered: this isn't comp.os.linux.desktop, it is > comp.os.linux.advocacy. So why would we not tout its strengths, rather > than its weaknesses? Why not? My take: I think there's a huge difference between the 'we' you're talking about and the Linux 'advocates' in COLA. While you're out there in 'programmer' land... people like Feeb are scratching around with regex, crowing about how he's a REAL 'programming' MAN. Meanwhile, there are newbs like me who use 'servers' like node.js to do lightweight crap with goofy databases (mongoDB) that people with more experience than Feeb (DFS, for one) look down their noses at. so COLA goes from posers like me, with crap like this... <https://streamable.com/54zg9> (FWIW... not much ;) there are only 3 output statements creating variety: <https://imgur.com/a/mCtgg6P>) ... to DFS with his python/SQL stuff, to owl with whatever sc/GUI magic he's messing with on any given day, to Feeb, who swears he's better than all of us, to people who mainly talk about politics, etc. IOW, who would you tout to ... or with for that matter? > Linux is strong on servers. Very strong. It is, but since Marek left no one talks much about it. > One can do exciting things > with it. Trolls don't want to talk about that. So, let's talk about > that. ;) > > So a few months ago, I finished a shell server for our customers where > each customer lives in their own chroot _and_ all their directory shares > are mounted using sshfs. That was an interesting project. Not sure how > I would even approach that with Windows, even if there was a solid > concept of a "shell user" on Windows. (I guess that would be more of a > "remote desktop user" type situation with Cytrix? Or powershell over > sshd? Beats me.) Nice! OK, I don't understand it all but nice ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 07:40 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <oe1r5e5n28qsu3em031ehr7r6qigan00pq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #486886 |
vallor wrote: >I'm sitting here at my Linux desktop at my Linux job doing Linux things, >and I don't have anything to say about it except that it is happening. > >"But you use Windows in your company!" > >So? That's what our customer's use, so why wouldn't customer-facing >technicians and support personnel use the same environment? Lesson one of the Micro$oft propaganda guide is to attack advocates of software Freedom as "hypocrites" if they use any closed-source software. Of course, such illogical assholery immediately shows them for what they are... -- "Tell us again how you use Windows during the day to make an income turd." - "Hadron", taking his best shot
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 14:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <UFg7E.310451$x85.100115@fx37.iad> |
| In reply to | #486978 |
On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 07:40:32 -0600, chrisv wrote: > vallor wrote: > >>I'm sitting here at my Linux desktop at my Linux job doing Linux things, >>and I don't have anything to say about it except that it is happening. >> >>"But you use Windows in your company!" >> >>So? That's what our customer's use, so why wouldn't customer-facing >>technicians and support personnel use the same environment? > > Lesson one of the Micro$oft propaganda guide is to attack advocates of > software Freedom as "hypocrites" if they use any closed-source software. > Of course, such illogical assholery immediately shows them for what > they are... Wrong. That would be lesson two. Lesson one is to let the Linux zealots bubble to the top and spout their religion. Kind of like you are doing right now. They do far more damage to themselves and Linux's reputation than any Microsoft propagandist could ever do. -- Ratchet Jaw The Locked and Loaded Jew
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 10:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <eeh7E.190918$nO2.98609@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #486983 |
On 2/8/2019 9:49 AM, Ratchetjaw wrote: > On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 07:40:32 -0600, chrisv wrote: > >> vallor wrote: >> >>> I'm sitting here at my Linux desktop at my Linux job doing Linux things, >>> and I don't have anything to say about it except that it is happening. >>> >>> "But you use Windows in your company!" >>> >>> So? That's what our customer's use, so why wouldn't customer-facing >>> technicians and support personnel use the same environment? >> >> Lesson one of the Micro$oft propaganda guide is to attack advocates of >> software Freedom as "hypocrites" if they use any closed-source software. >> Of course, such illogical assholery immediately shows them for what >> they are... > > Wrong. > That would be lesson two. > Lesson one is to let the Linux zealots bubble to the top and spout their > religion. Kind of like you are doing right now. They do far more damage > to themselves and Linux's reputation than any Microsoft propagandist > could ever do. shitv is lying, as usual. Most everyone these days uses a mix of closed- and open source software. What makes them hypocrites is making a living with Windows by day, but sliming onto cola at night and lying about and insulting MS and Windows. Most Linux "advocates" on cola, now and in the past, do this. It just shows their commitment to Linux/FOSS begins and ends at their wallet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 17:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q3kfrn01mku@news2.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #486986 |
On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:28:16 -0500, DFS vomited this verbiage that I considered to be worthy of my attention for one of a variety of possible reasons: > > What makes them hypocrites is making a living with Windows by day, but > sliming onto cola at night and lying about and insulting MS and Windows. > What a pathetically lame and irrational idiot! I make a living by mopping the floors after hours at various establishments. The agency buys Chinese-made mops that are highly inferior in quality to American-made brands. My co-workers and I complain about this sad fact all the time. At home, where we also mop our own floors, we use the American-made brands because we don't cut corners where it counts: our personal living spaces. According to the stupid stooge this makes us all "hypocrites" (which is the stooge's favorite word probably because it's the only concept he can more than minimally understand). But we also know that the stooge is dumber than a developmentally challenged schoolgirl, so we place no value whatsoever in his ignorant babbles. Microshit Winblows is monumental JUNK that is kept alive only by total IDIOTS. The case is closed. Hail Linux! Hail GNU and the FSF! Hail Stallman!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 13:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <cLj7E.306105$f65.133060@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #486996 |
On 2/8/2019 12:56 PM, F. Russell wrote: > I complain about this sad fact all the time. You complain but you do nothing about it, because what REALLY matters to you is money, comfort and convenience. In the face of a bigger paycheck or a longer drive to work, your bullshit babbling about "Fuck Microshit and all of its degenerate supporters." immediately flies out the Windows (tm). Fact is, you would be supremely pissed if you were stuck using GuhNoo/Linux crapware all day at work. > Microshit Winblows is monumental JUNK that is kept alive only by > total IDIOTS. ie you, your employer, your family, and your friends Screw GuhNoo Fuck the FSF Jail Stallman
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 13:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <BXj7E.481$Sw5.58@fx06.iad> |
| In reply to | #486996 |
On 2/8/2019 12:56 PM, F. Russell wrote: > I make a living by mopping the floors after hours at various > establishments. The agency buys Chinese-made mops that are > highly inferior in quality to American-made brands. My co-workers > and I complain about this sad fact all the time. At home, where > we also mop our own floors, we use the American-made brands > because we don't cut corners where it counts: our personal living spaces. FAIL. Because your reality is the opposite of this stupid analogy: At work you use good software like AutoCAD and MS Office, and you don't complain because you know it's the best. And everyone would think you're more stupid than usual. At home you run FOSS junk like FreeCAD and LibreOffice, and you don't complain because it costs you nothing. https://itsfoss.com/cad-software-linux/ <quote> Jan 2019 And for the advanced professionals, these tools are simply not up to the mark when weβre talking about industry standards. </quote> No reputable engineering firm would be caught dead running that hobby GPL slopware. Grow a conscience, moron.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 12:35 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <a5ir5e5oajdof0j61o7q1rj4ov4dfekog7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #486996 |
> some dumb fsck wrote: >> >> What makes them hypocrites is Stop lying. I've been called a "hypocrite", *many* times, simply for using Agent. You have called me a "hypocrite" because I don't work for free! You POS. >> lying about The cola advocates have, with some exceptions, been reasonable and correct, regarding MS and Windows. Much more so than shitty liars, like you, have been regarding Linux and other FOSS. You hypocrite. > and insulting MS and Windows. Absolutely nothing wrong with criticizing a tool that one uses on the job, or the company that makes it. You dumb fscking liar. -- "You Linux/OSS wackjobs should be held liable for spreading viruses and malware across the world, via your sendmail and postfix crapware." - DumFSck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 02:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <MWL7E.306137$zE8.84992@fx48.iad> |
| In reply to | #487002 |
On 2019-02-08, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> some dumb fsck wrote: >>> >>> What makes them hypocrites is > > Stop lying. I've been called a "hypocrite", *many* times, simply for > using Agent. Agent the Windows newsreader? I wouldn't call you a hypocrite. You're more of a troll. > You POS. Anger management problems?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 13:00 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n5kr5elssphndkjicf324o9qspr9tg97ia@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #486996 |
F. Russell wrote: >I make a living by mopping the floors after hours at various >establishments. The agency buys Chinese-made mops that are >highly inferior in quality to American-made brands. My co-workers >and I complain about this sad fact all the time. Now, imagine of the company that makes the mops that you use was a monopoly, controlling 90% of the market, and many mop buckets only worked with those mops, making them pretty-much unavoidable. Shitty, lying bastards like Dumfsck will call you a "hypocrite" if you don't quit your job for "the cause". -- "Linux developers are held to no standards whatsoever." - DumFSck, lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-09 03:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <0Hr7E.426321$Aq8.291645@fx47.iad> |
| In reply to | #487005 |
On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 13:00:32 -0600, chrisv wrote: > F. Russell wrote: > >>I make a living by mopping the floors after hours at various >>establishments. The agency buys Chinese-made mops that are highly >>inferior in quality to American-made brands. My co-workers and I >>complain about this sad fact all the time. > > Now, imagine of the company that makes the mops that you use was a > monopoly, controlling 90% of the market, and many mop buckets only > worked with those mops, making them pretty-much unavoidable. Yawn. Yet you and other Linux zealots have no problem spouting to whomever will listen, how great Linux is. The truth is Linux is free and if it was a decent replacement for desktop Windows it would be more popular. It's not and it isn't. Yet Linux server thrives. Android thrives. Ask yourself why. Then ask yourself why Linux desktop hasn't reached that same level. > Shitty, lying bastards like Dumfsck will call you a "hypocrite" if you > don't quit your job for "the cause". A hypocrite is someone like you chrisv who uses Windows to post to this group while at the same time takes every opportunity to tell others that they are Windows idiots. So why can't you post from Linux? Answer that one, hypocrite. -- Ratchet Jaw The Locked and Loaded Jew
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-09 18:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q3nql8$ev3$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #487015 |
Ratchetjaw wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > You're an idiot. Not worth reading. Completely out of touch with the realities of the world. -- The smallest worm will turn being trodden on. -- William Shakespeare, "Henry VI"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 02:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <k0M7E.145996$wz4.115175@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #487031 |
On 2019-02-09, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > Ratchetjaw wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> > > You're an idiot. Not worth reading. Completely out of touch with the > realities of the world. And you snipped what I said. I'll paraphrase for you: The realities of the world are that Android is a massive success. Linux as a server operating system is a massive success. Linux as a desktop operating system is a massive failure. Reasons include applications, pre-loaded Windows and the fact that Linux and it's community is a huge turnoff to someone interested in Linux. And in case you haven't notice, I use Linux, unlike the person you are supporting, chrisv who posts from Windows. I don't know you but you sound like another zealot which is just what the Linux community does not need. Zealots are bad. They are bad for Apple (ever see the idiots standing in line to pay for overpriced gadgets?), they are bad for Microsoft as well. At least you seem to be using Linux which is a good thing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-09 18:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q3nqir$ev3$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #486996 |
F. Russell wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:28:16 -0500, DFS vomited this verbiage that I > considered to be worthy of my attention for one of a variety of possible > reasons: > >> What makes them hypocrites is making a living with Windows by day, but >> sliming onto cola at night and lying about and insulting MS and Windows. > > What a pathetically lame and irrational idiot! Indeed. If your Corp forces you to use Windows, what choice do you have? Find a company that allows you to use Linux? How do you figure that out before you apply? Windows is basically locked in at most companies. A sad fact, but true. However, one can still use Linux in a VM, or in the Linux subsystem of Windows (will DFS ever call Microsoft "hypocrites" for supporting it? Of course not! He's an asshole, bent as a boomerang!) Or even use something like Git Bash, MSYS2, or a virtual machine. Of course, your Corp may have complete say-so over that, and prevent you from running anything not allowed by the corporate crapware. Powerbroker, anyone? -- You're being followed. Cut out the hanky-panky for a few days.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 02:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <V4M7E.145997$wz4.128280@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #487030 |
On 2019-02-09, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > F. Russell wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:28:16 -0500, DFS vomited this verbiage that I >> considered to be worthy of my attention for one of a variety of possible >> reasons: >> >>> What makes them hypocrites is making a living with Windows by day, but >>> sliming onto cola at night and lying about and insulting MS and Windows. >> >> What a pathetically lame and irrational idiot! > > Indeed. > > If your Corp forces you to use Windows, what choice do you have? > Find a company that allows you to use Linux? How do you figure that out > before you apply? > > Windows is basically locked in at most companies. A sad fact, but true. > > However, one can still use Linux in a VM, or in the Linux subsystem of > Windows (will DFS ever call Microsoft "hypocrites" for supporting it? Of > course not! He's an asshole, bent as a boomerang!) Or even use something > like Git Bash, MSYS2, or a virtual machine. > > Of course, your Corp may have complete say-so over that, and prevent you > from running anything not allowed by the corporate crapware. > > Powerbroker, anyone? > I agree with you on this one. For years my company provided me with a German manufacturer's car to use. I worked for that company so that's how it was. I had to drive it. I hated it mostly because it was always broken in one form or another. I also had to use Windows because all of my clients used Windows. But in my downtime, I use Linux. Why? Because I like it. It makes me think and it's gotten very good in recent versions. However, when a person who seems to have a deep rooted hate for Windows users can't even manage to post from Linux then I call troll or at the least troublemaker. Linux may not have Autocad, but it certainly has some very capable news programs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tom <tom@0.0.0.0> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-09 20:23 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <20190209202334.7e6f4663@viridi> |
| In reply to | #487043 |
On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 02:34:29 GMT
Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote:
> Linux may not have Autocad, but it certainly has some very capable
> news programs.
LibreCAD for 2d stuff and OpenSCAD for 3d stuff works extremely well.
Also KiCAD for EDA work.
--
_______________________________________
/ I know things about TROY DONAHUE that \
\ can't even be PRINTED!! /
---------------------------------------
\
\
/\ /\
//\\_//\\ ____
\_ _/ / /
/ * * \ /^^^]
\_\O/_/ [ ]
/ \_ [ /
\ \_ / /
[ [ / \/ _/
_[ [ \ /_/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 19:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q3qhbf$e4m$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #487043 |
Ratchetjaw wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 2019-02-09, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >> F. Russell wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:28:16 -0500, DFS vomited this verbiage that I >>> considered to be worthy of my attention for one of a variety of possible >>> reasons: >>> >>>> What makes them hypocrites is making a living with Windows by day, but >>>> sliming onto cola at night and lying about and insulting MS and Windows. >>> >>> What a pathetically lame and irrational idiot! >> >> Indeed. >> >> If your Corp forces you to use Windows, what choice do you have? >> Find a company that allows you to use Linux? How do you figure that out >> before you apply? >> >> Windows is basically locked in at most companies. A sad fact, but true. >> >> However, one can still use Linux in a VM, or in the Linux subsystem of >> Windows (will DFS ever call Microsoft "hypocrites" for supporting it? Of >> course not! He's an asshole, bent as a boomerang!) Or even use something >> like Git Bash, MSYS2, or a virtual machine. >> >> Of course, your Corp may have complete say-so over that, and prevent you >> from running anything not allowed by the corporate crapware. >> >> Powerbroker, anyone? >> > > I agree with you on this one. For years my company provided me with a > German manufacturer's car to use. I worked for that company so that's > how it was. I had to drive it. I hated it mostly because it was always > broken in one form or another. > I also had to use Windows because all of my clients used Windows. > But in my downtime, I use Linux. > Why? > Because I like it. > It makes me think and it's gotten very good in recent versions. > > However, when a person who seems to have a deep rooted hate for Windows > users can't even manage to post from Linux then I call troll or at the > least troublemaker. > > Linux may not have Autocad, but it certainly has some very capable news > programs. Since Linux has Catia, why would it need AutoCAD, which has fewer features? :-) -- Q: What do you get when you cross a mobster with an international standard? A: You get someone who makes you an offer that you can't understand!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-11 01:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <GU38E.218354$o84.194398@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #487086 |
On 2019-02-11, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > Ratchetjaw wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On 2019-02-09, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>> F. Russell wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:28:16 -0500, DFS vomited this verbiage that I >>>> considered to be worthy of my attention for one of a variety of possible >>>> reasons: >>>> >>>>> What makes them hypocrites is making a living with Windows by day, but >>>>> sliming onto cola at night and lying about and insulting MS and Windows. >>>> >>>> What a pathetically lame and irrational idiot! >>> >>> Indeed. >>> >>> If your Corp forces you to use Windows, what choice do you have? >>> Find a company that allows you to use Linux? How do you figure that out >>> before you apply? >>> >>> Windows is basically locked in at most companies. A sad fact, but true. >>> >>> However, one can still use Linux in a VM, or in the Linux subsystem of >>> Windows (will DFS ever call Microsoft "hypocrites" for supporting it? Of >>> course not! He's an asshole, bent as a boomerang!) Or even use something >>> like Git Bash, MSYS2, or a virtual machine. >>> >>> Of course, your Corp may have complete say-so over that, and prevent you >>> from running anything not allowed by the corporate crapware. >>> >>> Powerbroker, anyone? >>> >> >> I agree with you on this one. For years my company provided me with a >> German manufacturer's car to use. I worked for that company so that's >> how it was. I had to drive it. I hated it mostly because it was always >> broken in one form or another. >> I also had to use Windows because all of my clients used Windows. >> But in my downtime, I use Linux. >> Why? >> Because I like it. >> It makes me think and it's gotten very good in recent versions. >> >> However, when a person who seems to have a deep rooted hate for Windows >> users can't even manage to post from Linux then I call troll or at the >> least troublemaker. >> >> Linux may not have Autocad, but it certainly has some very capable news >> programs. > > Since Linux has Catia, why would it need AutoCAD, which has fewer > features? :-) Good question. Why not ask the people who are pushing AutoCad. -- Ratchet Jaw The Locked and Loaded Jew
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-14 04:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q6clus$5kb$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #487090 |
On 2019-02-11, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote: > On 2019-02-11, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >> Ratchetjaw wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> On 2019-02-09, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>> F. Russell wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:28:16 -0500, DFS vomited this verbiage that I >>>>> considered to be worthy of my attention for one of a variety of possible >>>>> reasons: >>>>> >>>>>> What makes them hypocrites is making a living with Windows by day, but >>>>>> sliming onto cola at night and lying about and insulting MS and Windows. >>>>> >>>>> What a pathetically lame and irrational idiot! >>>> >>>> Indeed. >>>> >>>> If your Corp forces you to use Windows, what choice do you have? >>>> Find a company that allows you to use Linux? How do you figure that out >>>> before you apply? >>>> >>>> Windows is basically locked in at most companies. A sad fact, but true. >>>> >>>> However, one can still use Linux in a VM, or in the Linux subsystem of >>>> Windows (will DFS ever call Microsoft "hypocrites" for supporting it? Of >>>> course not! He's an asshole, bent as a boomerang!) Or even use something >>>> like Git Bash, MSYS2, or a virtual machine. >>>> >>>> Of course, your Corp may have complete say-so over that, and prevent you >>>> from running anything not allowed by the corporate crapware. >>>> >>>> Powerbroker, anyone? >>>> >>> >>> I agree with you on this one. For years my company provided me with a >>> German manufacturer's car to use. I worked for that company so that's >>> how it was. I had to drive it. I hated it mostly because it was always >>> broken in one form or another. >>> I also had to use Windows because all of my clients used Windows. >>> But in my downtime, I use Linux. >>> Why? >>> Because I like it. >>> It makes me think and it's gotten very good in recent versions. >>> >>> However, when a person who seems to have a deep rooted hate for Windows >>> users can't even manage to post from Linux then I call troll or at the >>> least troublemaker. >>> >>> Linux may not have Autocad, but it certainly has some very capable news >>> programs. >> >> Since Linux has Catia, why would it need AutoCAD, which has fewer >> features? :-) > > Good question. > Why not ask the people who are pushing AutoCad. And so it goes ... Linux ... uh ... no Microshit Office (thank goodness) and ... uh ... ummm ... no ... uh ... Photoshop and ummm ... no ummmm ... uh ... AutoCad. But, more importantly, no malware. And, on Windows, malware is not a niche product. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web