Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #486886

Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund?

From vallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund?
Date 2019-02-06 22:16 +0000
Message-ID <gc14mrFrsg8U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

Mr. Ahlstrom said the group was moribund.  Not quite, but close.

I'm sitting here at my Linux desktop at my Linux job doing Linux things, 
and I don't have anything to say about it except that it is happening.

"But you use Windows in your company!"

So?  That's what our customer's use, so why wouldn't customer-facing 
technicians and support personnel use the same environment?

Even so, operations folks -- systems and networking -- are as likely as 
not to be using a Linux desktop.  And for those who don't, it would be 
surprising for them not to be running Linux in a virt, or even with the 
Windows Subsystem for Linux.

As if that mattered:  this isn't comp.os.linux.desktop, it is 
comp.os.linux.advocacy.  So why would we not tout its strengths, rather 
than its weaknesses?

Linux is strong on servers.  Very strong.  One can do exciting things 
with it.  Trolls don't want to talk about that.  So, let's talk about 
that. ;)

So a few months ago, I finished a shell server for our customers where 
each customer lives in their own chroot _and_ all their directory shares 
are mounted using sshfs.  That was an interesting project.  Not sure how 
I would even approach that with Windows, even if there was a solid 
concept of a "shell user" on Windows.  (I guess that would be more of a 
"remote desktop user" type situation with Cytrix?  Or powershell over 
sshd?  Beats me.)

-- 
-v

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-02-06 22:16 +0000
  Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-02-06 15:03 -0800
  Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-08 07:40 -0600
    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-08 14:49 +0000
      Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-08 10:28 -0500
        Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-08 17:56 +0000
          Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-08 13:19 -0500
          Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-08 13:32 -0500
          Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-08 12:35 -0600
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:23 +0000
          Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-08 13:00 -0600
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-09 03:21 +0000
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 18:55 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:29 +0000
          Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 18:54 -0500
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:34 +0000
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? tom <tom@0.0.0.0> - 2019-02-09 20:23 -0800
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-10 19:34 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 01:06 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-03-14 04:39 +0000
                When I see "malware", the phrase "clueless idiot" pops into my head. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-03-13 21:49 -0700
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? tom <tom@0.0.0.0> - 2019-02-09 20:22 -0800
              Please kill yourself on the way out of the door Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:46 -0800
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-10 15:02 -0500
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2019-02-10 21:32 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 21:48 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-10 23:04 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 23:15 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-10 23:23 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 23:37 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-10 23:39 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 23:50 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 00:29 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 01:01 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 10:24 +0100
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 03:44 -0800
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 13:26 +0100
                To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-11 04:46 -0800
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-11 10:41 -0500
                Re: ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 09:57 -0600
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 10:29 -0600
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 10:38 -0600
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 11:08 -0600
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-02-11 13:22 -0500
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 12:56 -0600
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 16:44 +0000
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 09:11 -0800
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 12:59 -0600
                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-11 12:10 -0700
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 13:20 -0600
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 12:22 -0700
                Re: Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 14:51 -0600
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 13:55 -0700
                Re: Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 14:59 -0600
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 15:35 -0600
                Re: Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-12 10:56 -0600
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-12 11:12 -0600
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 09:41 -0600
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 13:47 -0500
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 13:04 -0800
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 15:39 -0600
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 17:56 +0000
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 13:03 -0800
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 15:53 -0600
                To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-11 13:57 -0800
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 15:03 -0700
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 22:03 +0000
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 17:07 -0600
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 15:38 -0800
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 17:14 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 06:10 -0800
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 16:38 +0100
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 10:39 -0800
                *You* can't, I can. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-11 14:00 -0800
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 13:50 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-10 19:36 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 01:12 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-03-14 19:05 -0400
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 07:11 -0600
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 06:35 -0800
        Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-08 18:53 +0000
          Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-08 14:26 -0500
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-08 19:59 +0000
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-09 03:26 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 19:00 -0500
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 18:59 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-09 19:58 -0800
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 07:17 -0600
                Signatures are for posts with ZERO informational content Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 05:27 -0800
                Re: Signatures are for posts with ZERO informational content chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 07:33 -0600
                A person could actually grow old waiting to be enlighten on COLA about Linux. Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 05:36 -0800
                Re: A person could actually grow old waiting to be enlighten on COLA about Linux. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-11 13:52 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 06:12 -0800
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 08:33 -0600
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-10 12:23 -0500
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-09 21:54 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2019-02-10 14:16 +0000
                Russell's shitty attitude is the PROBLEM, rather than the solution Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 06:29 -0800
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:36 +0000
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-09 22:03 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 14:52 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-10 13:14 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 18:18 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2019-02-23 14:59 +0000
  There is stupid, then there is vallor stupid Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-09 05:25 -0800
  Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 18:48 -0500
    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:40 +0000
      Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-10 19:31 -0500
        Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 01:05 +0000
    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-09 21:47 -0500
    The Linux Advocates on COLA are total ass-holes Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:51 -0800
      Re: The Linux Advocates on COLA are total ass-holes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-10 08:13 -0500
        Time to drop a MOAB on COLA Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 04:52 -0800
        Re: The Linux Advocates on COLA are total ass-holes Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2019-02-16 02:41 +0000
    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-11 14:47 -0500
  Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-11 14:49 -0500
    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-02-12 09:26 +0000

csiph-web