Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #348402 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-02 18:29 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-04-13 05:37 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 109 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Linux advocates don't support their own. Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-02 18:29 -0700
Re: Linux advocates don't support their own. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-02 21:41 -0400
Re: Linux advocates don't support their own. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-04-02 22:16 -0400
Re: Linux advocates don't support their own. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-02 22:19 -0400
Is that you, Snit? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 04:00 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-03 17:23 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? "Dr. John Grubor" <dr.john.grubor@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 18:42 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-04-12 12:28 -0500
Re: Is that you, Snit? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 10:38 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-12 10:42 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <fat.linux.loser@linux.is.sh.it> - 2016-04-12 14:50 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-12 13:06 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-12 17:12 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-12 14:43 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-12 17:55 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-12 19:41 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-13 08:27 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-13 12:04 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-13 21:57 +0200
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-13 13:25 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-13 22:31 +0200
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-13 16:36 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-13 17:21 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-13 16:33 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <maGNUm@lin.sux> - 2016-04-13 19:39 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-13 17:02 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <maGNUm@lin.sux> - 2016-04-14 11:00 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 08:09 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-14 11:57 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 12:26 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-14 12:45 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-14 11:40 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 14:46 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 15:06 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-14 15:28 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 15:32 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-14 12:45 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 13:10 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 16:12 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 13:17 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 16:31 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 13:35 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 16:41 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-14 20:42 +0000
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 16:44 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 13:56 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:00 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 14:05 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:14 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 20:21 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 20:40 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-15 02:43 +0200
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 21:01 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 21:18 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 21:24 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 17:18 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 17:12 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 14:16 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:23 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 14:24 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:26 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-14 23:09 +0100
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 20:21 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:21 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 20:27 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 20:59 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 21:25 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 21:40 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-15 08:19 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 13:00 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 17:16 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:25 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 09:28 -0700
The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-14 05:53 +0000
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-14 01:55 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-14 07:04 -0500
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Silver Slimer <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-14 12:17 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 09:36 -0700
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-14 17:48 +0100
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 13:03 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 10:46 -0700
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 14:17 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 14:55 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 12:57 -0700
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 16:08 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 17:15 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:19 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 17:04 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.invalid> - 2016-04-15 01:11 +0000
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 21:25 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-15 03:35 +0200
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-15 07:18 +0000
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-15 03:39 -0700
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-16 08:15 +0200
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-16 00:04 -0700
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-16 11:27 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-17 07:29 +0200
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-17 01:48 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 19:21 -0700
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-15 09:59 +0100
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 08:27 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-14 11:55 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 17:08 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-14 15:34 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <fat.linux.loser@linux.is.sh.it> - 2016-04-12 14:47 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.invalid> - 2016-04-12 23:45 +0000
Me Sham who is Snit is a total Ass Wipe! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 04:34 -0700
Re: Me Sham who is Snit is a total Ass Wipe! Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-13 08:29 -0400
Me Sham who is Snit is a total Ass Wipe! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 05:37 -0700
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
| From | Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 17:26 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Is that you, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <nep1oe$4l2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #349911 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:24:46 -0700, Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-04-14, Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> wrote: > A nine year old can install Linux. What's your excuse? I'm not nine years old.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 23:09 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Is that you, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <71h5uc-tv5.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #349904 |
It was reported that Marek Novotny posted: > On 2016-04-14, Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> wrote: > >> 've given Lunix so many damned chances since 994 and it has done nothing >> but disappoint me or fuck up my partitions nd hardware. Every time I was >> told that I did this or that wrong or sed the wrong distribution but even >> if I did EXACTLY what was ecommended, the issues piled up one after the >> other. It is complete arbage and anyone who advocates it is nothing more >> than a lying loser. hey might not like the label but it's no less true. > > You can't even install Linux!! HAHAHHAHAHAHA Oh man you are dumb. A rock has more intelligence than that lame-assed fuckwit. Makes you wonder who turns his pc on for him. -- openSUSE 13.2 64-bit KDE 4.14.9 Kernel: 4.5.0-10.1.gb98c3d3-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Apr 11 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux This message is virus free, as absolutely NO Micro$oft products were used in its preparation. "If you do want to clean your computer of malware, the first software to delete is Windows." http://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-microsoft.en.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 20:21 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Is that you, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <nepc0g$6tg$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #349904 |
On 2016-04-14 5:16 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-04-14, Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> wrote: > >> 've given Lunix so many damned chances since 994 and it has done nothing >> but disappoint me or fuck up my partitions nd hardware. Every time I was >> told that I did this or that wrong or sed the wrong distribution but even >> if I did EXACTLY what was ecommended, the issues piled up one after the >> other. It is complete arbage and anyone who advocates it is nothing more >> than a lying loser. hey might not like the label but it's no less true. > > You can't even install Linux!! HAHAHHAHAHAHA Oh man you are dumb. Yep, that's it. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 17:21 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Is that you, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <nep1em$3sl$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #349901 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:12:51 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 2016-04-14 3:06 PM, Omar wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:46:03 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 2016-04-14 2:40 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 4/14/16, 8:00 AM, in article neob3d$c3m$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" >>>> <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2016-04-13 8:02 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>>> On 2016-04-13, Silver Slimer <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: >>>>>>> It's sad too because some of their products are awesome. Youtube, for >>>>>>> one, revolutionized the Internet no matter how much people might >>>>>>> downplay it. >>>>>> >>>>>> yeah, they wrote a check for $1.1 billion when they bought it. That took >>>>>> brains, huh.... >>>>> >>>>> Regardless of who _created_ it, the fact remains that Google _owns_ it >>>>> and is therefore legally allowed to take credit for what the company >>>>> might have done before they took it over. In an advocate's mind, such a >>>>> concept is foreign but people who live in reality understand this. >>>>> >>>> They own it and have changed it. And collect the data from it. And put the >>>> ads on it. >>>> >>>> Yes, it is a Google tool now. No doubt. >>> >>> I find it amazing how these lying Linux losers will even attempt to >>> change the definition of words or manipulate the interpretation of laws >>> to make Linux look good. It's like someone polishing a turd and putting >>> a clearcoat on it in the hope that it will convince people that it's >>> worth something. >> >> Have you ever met an honest Linux user in any of these forums? >> The Linux - FOSS community attracts pathological liars by the barge. > > And I kept falling for it. We all have. > I've given Lunix so many damned chances since > 1994 and it has done nothing but disappoint me or fuck up my partitions > and hardware. As have had all of us. > Every time I was told that I did this or that wrong or > used the wrong distribution but even if I did EXACTLY what was > recommended, the issues piled up one after the other. It is complete > garbage and anyone who advocates it is nothing more than a lying loser. > They might not like the label but it's no less true. The problem is the Linux losers will always blame everything but the real source of the problem which is Linux. The label "Linux loser" is the perfect description of these freaks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 20:27 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Is that you, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <nepca9$7n7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #349909 |
On 2016-04-14 5:21 PM, Omar wrote: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:12:51 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > >> On 2016-04-14 3:06 PM, Omar wrote: >>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:46:03 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> >>>> On 2016-04-14 2:40 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 4/14/16, 8:00 AM, in article neob3d$c3m$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" >>>>> <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2016-04-13 8:02 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>>>> On 2016-04-13, Silver Slimer <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: >>>>>>>> It's sad too because some of their products are awesome. Youtube, for >>>>>>>> one, revolutionized the Internet no matter how much people might >>>>>>>> downplay it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> yeah, they wrote a check for $1.1 billion when they bought it. That took >>>>>>> brains, huh.... >>>>>> >>>>>> Regardless of who _created_ it, the fact remains that Google _owns_ it >>>>>> and is therefore legally allowed to take credit for what the company >>>>>> might have done before they took it over. In an advocate's mind, such a >>>>>> concept is foreign but people who live in reality understand this. >>>>>> >>>>> They own it and have changed it. And collect the data from it. And put the >>>>> ads on it. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, it is a Google tool now. No doubt. >>>> >>>> I find it amazing how these lying Linux losers will even attempt to >>>> change the definition of words or manipulate the interpretation of laws >>>> to make Linux look good. It's like someone polishing a turd and putting >>>> a clearcoat on it in the hope that it will convince people that it's >>>> worth something. >>> >>> Have you ever met an honest Linux user in any of these forums? >>> The Linux - FOSS community attracts pathological liars by the barge. >> >> And I kept falling for it. > > We all have. I WANTED to believe that these were the good guys but looking back, Microsoft has always been the one doing the good stuff. They hired my high school's best friend and gave him a primo job which was much deserved when NVIDIA passed on him, they gave us a great browser to replace the horrendous Netscape for free when we needed one, they gave free e-mail at a time when nobody could get an address anywhere but from their ISP. Now they're giving us shitloads of online space, an online calendar, a free upgrade to Windows 10 and even a free anti-virus in that operating system while Linux only offers us headaches within an ugly interface attached to gigantic losers who will only blame us if things don't work right. >> I've given Lunix so many damned chances since >> 1994 and it has done nothing but disappoint me or fuck up my partitions >> and hardware. > > As have had all of us. It was a lot of wasted time which I will simply never get back. >> Every time I was told that I did this or that wrong or >> used the wrong distribution but even if I did EXACTLY what was >> recommended, the issues piled up one after the other. It is complete >> garbage and anyone who advocates it is nothing more than a lying loser. >> They might not like the label but it's no less true. > > The problem is the Linux losers will always blame everything but the > real source of the problem which is Linux. > > The label "Linux loser" is the perfect description of these freaks. There is no other way to describe a fat midget who cleans toilets for a living like William Poaster, a man-child married to a insect-like freak like Chris Ahlstrom and a stand-in for Jabba the Hutt like Scott Doty (vallor). -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 20:59 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Is that you, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <nepe6p$cb1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #349940 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:27:00 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 2016-04-14 5:21 PM, Omar wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:12:51 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 2016-04-14 3:06 PM, Omar wrote: >>>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:46:03 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2016-04-14 2:40 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 4/14/16, 8:00 AM, in article neob3d$c3m$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" >>>>>> <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2016-04-13 8:02 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2016-04-13, Silver Slimer <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: >>>>>>>>> It's sad too because some of their products are awesome. Youtube, for >>>>>>>>> one, revolutionized the Internet no matter how much people might >>>>>>>>> downplay it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> yeah, they wrote a check for $1.1 billion when they bought it. That took >>>>>>>> brains, huh.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regardless of who _created_ it, the fact remains that Google _owns_ it >>>>>>> and is therefore legally allowed to take credit for what the company >>>>>>> might have done before they took it over. In an advocate's mind, such a >>>>>>> concept is foreign but people who live in reality understand this. >>>>>>> >>>>>> They own it and have changed it. And collect the data from it. And put the >>>>>> ads on it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, it is a Google tool now. No doubt. >>>>> >>>>> I find it amazing how these lying Linux losers will even attempt to >>>>> change the definition of words or manipulate the interpretation of laws >>>>> to make Linux look good. It's like someone polishing a turd and putting >>>>> a clearcoat on it in the hope that it will convince people that it's >>>>> worth something. >>>> >>>> Have you ever met an honest Linux user in any of these forums? >>>> The Linux - FOSS community attracts pathological liars by the barge. >>> >>> And I kept falling for it. >> >> We all have. > > I WANTED to believe that these were the good guys but looking back, > Microsoft has always been the one doing the good stuff. They hired my > high school's best friend and gave him a primo job which was much > deserved when NVIDIA passed on him, they gave us a great browser to > replace the horrendous Netscape for free when we needed one, they gave > free e-mail at a time when nobody could get an address anywhere but from > their ISP. Now they're giving us shitloads of online space, an online > calendar, a free upgrade to Windows 10 and even a free anti-virus in > that operating system while Linux only offers us headaches within an > ugly interface attached to gigantic losers who will only blame us if > things don't work right. The first thing you learn after installing Linux is what a bunch of liars, freaks and kooks fill the Linux community and blogosphere. That comes after you learn how much Linux sucks of course. Linux is pure crap. It always has been and if things keep progressing in a state of mass confusion it always will be. The interesting thing is that these so called Linux advocate, freaky Friday Linux zealots always seem to be hanging around like gadflies waiting to attack the person attempting to get help with Linux. These social outcasts will never admit Linux's faults, will never point out another one of their cult who lies and certainly will never tell the truth because they themselves are liars as well. And you can easily find this type of dysfunctional behavior all over the net. Post a negative Linux article and like a billion white blood cells attacking a germ they will descend upon you as if you were Lizzie Borden and just whacked their mother and father. Take a close look at these freaks. Especially those in COLA. These types didn't become kooks overnight. They were born like this and their early years, childhood, formative years, are responsible for their adult life and the path it has taken them on. What is really interesting is how they have all collected like one huge pile of sewage in the septic tank of Linux. There is a reason why Linux attracts this particular type of loser. I don't know what it is, I doubt anyone really knows, but the facts demonstrate the end result. >>> I've given Lunix so many damned chances since >>> 1994 and it has done nothing but disappoint me or fuck up my partitions >>> and hardware. >> >> As have had all of us. > > It was a lot of wasted time which I will simply never get back. The saying is "Linux is free when your time has no value". If you read any of these forums you will quickly come to the conclusion that Linux users fuck around with their computer a hell of a lot more than they use it for productive work. And while that is bad enough by itself, most of the time they are fucking around and inventing complicated solutions for problems that don't exist on other OS platforms. Linux is a huge waste of time. That's a fact. >>> Every time I was told that I did this or that wrong or >>> used the wrong distribution but even if I did EXACTLY what was >>> recommended, the issues piled up one after the other. It is complete >>> garbage and anyone who advocates it is nothing more than a lying loser. >>> They might not like the label but it's no less true. >> >> The problem is the Linux losers will always blame everything but the >> real source of the problem which is Linux. >> >> The label "Linux loser" is the perfect description of these freaks. > > There is no other way to describe a fat midget who cleans toilets for a > living like William Poaster, a man-child married to a insect-like freak > like Chris Ahlstrom and a stand-in for Jabba the Hutt like Scott Doty > (vallor). William Poaster is a janitor? That's priceless. I thought the other guy was kidding when he said William Poaster won a golden plunger award. Chris Ahlstrom is really married? I find that difficult to believe. What kind of woman would marry an extreme loser like him? I've already seen some pictures of vallor. He has a serious weight problem. He should go on a diet of 500 calories a day immediately and maybe in 2 years he will still be alive. And what is with this "oblinux" weirdo-speak gibberish he posts? Another Star Wars fanatic? Linux attracts those screwballs as well as the Star Trek nuts. Quite odd.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 21:25 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Is that you, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <nepfn1$etl$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #349957 |
On 2016-04-14 8:59 PM, Omar wrote: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:27:00 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > >> On 2016-04-14 5:21 PM, Omar wrote: >>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:12:51 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> >>>> On 2016-04-14 3:06 PM, Omar wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:46:03 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2016-04-14 2:40 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 4/14/16, 8:00 AM, in article neob3d$c3m$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" >>>>>>> <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2016-04-13 8:02 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2016-04-13, Silver Slimer <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> It's sad too because some of their products are awesome. Youtube, for >>>>>>>>>> one, revolutionized the Internet no matter how much people might >>>>>>>>>> downplay it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> yeah, they wrote a check for $1.1 billion when they bought it. That took >>>>>>>>> brains, huh.... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regardless of who _created_ it, the fact remains that Google _owns_ it >>>>>>>> and is therefore legally allowed to take credit for what the company >>>>>>>> might have done before they took it over. In an advocate's mind, such a >>>>>>>> concept is foreign but people who live in reality understand this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> They own it and have changed it. And collect the data from it. And put the >>>>>>> ads on it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, it is a Google tool now. No doubt. >>>>>> >>>>>> I find it amazing how these lying Linux losers will even attempt to >>>>>> change the definition of words or manipulate the interpretation of laws >>>>>> to make Linux look good. It's like someone polishing a turd and putting >>>>>> a clearcoat on it in the hope that it will convince people that it's >>>>>> worth something. >>>>> >>>>> Have you ever met an honest Linux user in any of these forums? >>>>> The Linux - FOSS community attracts pathological liars by the barge. >>>> >>>> And I kept falling for it. >>> >>> We all have. >> >> I WANTED to believe that these were the good guys but looking back, >> Microsoft has always been the one doing the good stuff. They hired my >> high school's best friend and gave him a primo job which was much >> deserved when NVIDIA passed on him, they gave us a great browser to >> replace the horrendous Netscape for free when we needed one, they gave >> free e-mail at a time when nobody could get an address anywhere but from >> their ISP. Now they're giving us shitloads of online space, an online >> calendar, a free upgrade to Windows 10 and even a free anti-virus in >> that operating system while Linux only offers us headaches within an >> ugly interface attached to gigantic losers who will only blame us if >> things don't work right. > > The first thing you learn after installing Linux is what a bunch of > liars, freaks and kooks fill the Linux community and blogosphere. > That comes after you learn how much Linux sucks of course. I have not counted A SINGLE media management program in Linux that was worth a damn. It has something like 32 but not one manages to do the whole job WELL. > Linux is pure crap. It always has been and if things keep progressing > in a state of mass confusion it always will be. > > The interesting thing is that these so called Linux advocate, freaky > Friday Linux zealots always seem to be hanging around like gadflies > waiting to attack the person attempting to get help with Linux. > > These social outcasts will never admit Linux's faults, will never > point out another one of their cult who lies and certainly will never > tell the truth because they themselves are liars as well. > > And you can easily find this type of dysfunctional behavior all over > the net. > Post a negative Linux article and like a billion white blood cells > attacking a germ they will descend upon you as if you were Lizzie > Borden and just whacked their mother and father. > > Take a close look at these freaks. > Especially those in COLA. > These types didn't become kooks overnight. They were born like this > and their early years, childhood, formative years, are responsible for > their adult life and the path it has taken them on. > > What is really interesting is how they have all collected like one > huge pile of sewage in the septic tank of Linux. > There is a reason why Linux attracts this particular type of loser. > I don't know what it is, I doubt anyone really knows, but the facts > demonstrate the end result. Vile creatures these Linux losers. I imagine that they live in sewers. >>>> I've given Lunix so many damned chances since >>>> 1994 and it has done nothing but disappoint me or fuck up my partitions >>>> and hardware. >>> >>> As have had all of us. >> >> It was a lot of wasted time which I will simply never get back. > > The saying is "Linux is free when your time has no value". > If you read any of these forums you will quickly come to the > conclusion that Linux users fuck around with their computer a hell of > a lot more than they use it for productive work. > And while that is bad enough by itself, most of the time they are > fucking around and inventing complicated solutions for problems that > don't exist on other OS platforms. > > Linux is a huge waste of time. > That's a fact. Things that can EASILY be accomplished with proprietary programs or a proprietary operating system ALWAYS require something counter-intuitive and faulty in Linux to be accomplished. Just converting music is a mess and fucks up (a lot of my music files were corrupted using SoundConverter whereas ffmpeg lost the tag information) and handling e-mail encryption is a joke in comparison to Windows in Outlook. Truly pathetic stuff. >>>> Every time I was told that I did this or that wrong or >>>> used the wrong distribution but even if I did EXACTLY what was >>>> recommended, the issues piled up one after the other. It is complete >>>> garbage and anyone who advocates it is nothing more than a lying loser. >>>> They might not like the label but it's no less true. >>> >>> The problem is the Linux losers will always blame everything but the >>> real source of the problem which is Linux. >>> >>> The label "Linux loser" is the perfect description of these freaks. >> >> There is no other way to describe a fat midget who cleans toilets for a >> living like William Poaster, a man-child married to a insect-like freak >> like Chris Ahlstrom and a stand-in for Jabba the Hutt like Scott Doty >> (vallor). > > William Poaster is a janitor? > That's priceless. > I thought the other guy was kidding when he said William Poaster won a > golden plunger award. It's all true. > Chris Ahlstrom is really married? > I find that difficult to believe. > What kind of woman would marry an extreme loser like him? Jayne Ahlstrom. Here's a picture <http://frame.musc.edu/Apps/ProfileDirectory/ProfileImages/ahlstrjb.jpg> . In her spare time, she enjoys eating crickets and emasculating her husband. > I've already seen some pictures of vallor. He has a serious weight > problem. He should go on a diet of 500 calories a day immediately and > maybe in 2 years he will still be alive. > And what is with this "oblinux" weirdo-speak gibberish he posts? > Another Star Wars fanatic? > Linux attracts those screwballs as well as the Star Trek nuts. > Quite odd. Scott Doty never got over the fact that they stopped making Star Wars movies in the 1980s and did not need him to stand in for Jabba the Hutt anymore. When they started digitizing the fat fuck, he lost whatever marbles he had left and installed Linux. -- Silver Slimer The silver-tongued heel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 21:40 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Is that you, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <nepgjl$gai$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #349973 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 21:25:00 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 2016-04-14 8:59 PM, Omar wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:27:00 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 2016-04-14 5:21 PM, Omar wrote: >>>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:12:51 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2016-04-14 3:06 PM, Omar wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:46:03 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2016-04-14 2:40 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 4/14/16, 8:00 AM, in article neob3d$c3m$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" >>>>>>>> <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2016-04-13 8:02 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2016-04-13, Silver Slimer <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> It's sad too because some of their products are awesome. Youtube, for >>>>>>>>>>> one, revolutionized the Internet no matter how much people might >>>>>>>>>>> downplay it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> yeah, they wrote a check for $1.1 billion when they bought it. That took >>>>>>>>>> brains, huh.... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regardless of who _created_ it, the fact remains that Google _owns_ it >>>>>>>>> and is therefore legally allowed to take credit for what the company >>>>>>>>> might have done before they took it over. In an advocate's mind, such a >>>>>>>>> concept is foreign but people who live in reality understand this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They own it and have changed it. And collect the data from it. And put the >>>>>>>> ads on it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, it is a Google tool now. No doubt. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I find it amazing how these lying Linux losers will even attempt to >>>>>>> change the definition of words or manipulate the interpretation of laws >>>>>>> to make Linux look good. It's like someone polishing a turd and putting >>>>>>> a clearcoat on it in the hope that it will convince people that it's >>>>>>> worth something. >>>>>> >>>>>> Have you ever met an honest Linux user in any of these forums? >>>>>> The Linux - FOSS community attracts pathological liars by the barge. >>>>> >>>>> And I kept falling for it. >>>> >>>> We all have. >>> >>> I WANTED to believe that these were the good guys but looking back, >>> Microsoft has always been the one doing the good stuff. They hired my >>> high school's best friend and gave him a primo job which was much >>> deserved when NVIDIA passed on him, they gave us a great browser to >>> replace the horrendous Netscape for free when we needed one, they gave >>> free e-mail at a time when nobody could get an address anywhere but from >>> their ISP. Now they're giving us shitloads of online space, an online >>> calendar, a free upgrade to Windows 10 and even a free anti-virus in >>> that operating system while Linux only offers us headaches within an >>> ugly interface attached to gigantic losers who will only blame us if >>> things don't work right. >> >> The first thing you learn after installing Linux is what a bunch of >> liars, freaks and kooks fill the Linux community and blogosphere. >> That comes after you learn how much Linux sucks of course. > > I have not counted A SINGLE media management program in Linux that was > worth a damn. It has something like 32 but not one manages to do the > whole job WELL. I wouldn't trust Linux to manage my media. That's just asking for trouble. When I test Linux, I set up a directory and copy over a few thousand mp3 files and let Linux perform it's "magic" on the copies and not the originals. Linux never fails to fuck something up. Tagging errors, corruption, lost files you name it. >> Linux is pure crap. It always has been and if things keep progressing >> in a state of mass confusion it always will be. >> >> The interesting thing is that these so called Linux advocate, freaky >> Friday Linux zealots always seem to be hanging around like gadflies >> waiting to attack the person attempting to get help with Linux. >> >> These social outcasts will never admit Linux's faults, will never >> point out another one of their cult who lies and certainly will never >> tell the truth because they themselves are liars as well. >> >> And you can easily find this type of dysfunctional behavior all over >> the net. >> Post a negative Linux article and like a billion white blood cells >> attacking a germ they will descend upon you as if you were Lizzie >> Borden and just whacked their mother and father. >> >> Take a close look at these freaks. >> Especially those in COLA. >> These types didn't become kooks overnight. They were born like this >> and their early years, childhood, formative years, are responsible for >> their adult life and the path it has taken them on. >> >> What is really interesting is how they have all collected like one >> huge pile of sewage in the septic tank of Linux. >> There is a reason why Linux attracts this particular type of loser. >> I don't know what it is, I doubt anyone really knows, but the facts >> demonstrate the end result. > > Vile creatures these Linux losers. I imagine that they live in sewers. That's a good place for them. It keeps the stench away from normal human beings. >>>>> I've given Lunix so many damned chances since >>>>> 1994 and it has done nothing but disappoint me or fuck up my partitions >>>>> and hardware. >>>> >>>> As have had all of us. >>> >>> It was a lot of wasted time which I will simply never get back. >> >> The saying is "Linux is free when your time has no value". >> If you read any of these forums you will quickly come to the >> conclusion that Linux users fuck around with their computer a hell of >> a lot more than they use it for productive work. >> And while that is bad enough by itself, most of the time they are >> fucking around and inventing complicated solutions for problems that >> don't exist on other OS platforms. >> >> Linux is a huge waste of time. >> That's a fact. > > Things that can EASILY be accomplished with proprietary programs or a > proprietary operating system ALWAYS require something counter-intuitive > and faulty in Linux to be accomplished. Just converting music is a mess > and fucks up (a lot of my music files were corrupted using > SoundConverter whereas ffmpeg lost the tag information) and handling > e-mail encryption is a joke in comparison to Windows in Outlook. Truly > pathetic stuff. I had Amarok decide all on it's own to auto-tag, or should I say RE-auto-tag my entire collection. I never told it to do that. Fortunately like I said above it fucked up copies and not the originals. It was probably some default setting somewhere that I missed. I've never encountered a Windows program doing anything like that all on it's own. >>>>> Every time I was told that I did this or that wrong or >>>>> used the wrong distribution but even if I did EXACTLY what was >>>>> recommended, the issues piled up one after the other. It is complete >>>>> garbage and anyone who advocates it is nothing more than a lying loser. >>>>> They might not like the label but it's no less true. >>>> >>>> The problem is the Linux losers will always blame everything but the >>>> real source of the problem which is Linux. >>>> >>>> The label "Linux loser" is the perfect description of these freaks. >>> >>> There is no other way to describe a fat midget who cleans toilets for a >>> living like William Poaster, a man-child married to a insect-like freak >>> like Chris Ahlstrom and a stand-in for Jabba the Hutt like Scott Doty >>> (vallor). >> >> William Poaster is a janitor? >> That's priceless. >> I thought the other guy was kidding when he said William Poaster won a >> golden plunger award. > > It's all true. Fuck. No wonder he is so bitter. Let's face it, people of normal intelligence don't go through life aspiring to be a janitor. It's kind of something one ends up in after failing at every other career. >> Chris Ahlstrom is really married? >> I find that difficult to believe. >> What kind of woman would marry an extreme loser like him? > > Jayne Ahlstrom. Here's a picture > <http://frame.musc.edu/Apps/ProfileDirectory/ProfileImages/ahlstrjb.jpg> > . In her spare time, she enjoys eating crickets and emasculating her > husband. That's a woman? Looks like a gay male. >> I've already seen some pictures of vallor. He has a serious weight >> problem. He should go on a diet of 500 calories a day immediately and >> maybe in 2 years he will still be alive. >> And what is with this "oblinux" weirdo-speak gibberish he posts? >> Another Star Wars fanatic? >> Linux attracts those screwballs as well as the Star Trek nuts. >> Quite odd. > > Scott Doty never got over the fact that they stopped making Star Wars > movies in the 1980s and did not need him to stand in for Jabba the Hutt > anymore. When they started digitizing the fat fuck, he lost whatever > marbles he had left and installed Linux. ROTFLMAO! I'd wager he ate his marbles. Along with everything else in sight.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 08:19 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Is that you, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <neqm1o$svp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #349978 |
On 2016-04-14 9:40 PM, Omar wrote: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 21:25:00 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > >> On 2016-04-14 8:59 PM, Omar wrote: >>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:27:00 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> >>>> On 2016-04-14 5:21 PM, Omar wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:12:51 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2016-04-14 3:06 PM, Omar wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:46:03 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2016-04-14 2:40 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 4/14/16, 8:00 AM, in article neob3d$c3m$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" >>>>>>>>> <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2016-04-13 8:02 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-04-13, Silver Slimer <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> It's sad too because some of their products are awesome. Youtube, for >>>>>>>>>>>> one, revolutionized the Internet no matter how much people might >>>>>>>>>>>> downplay it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> yeah, they wrote a check for $1.1 billion when they bought it. That took >>>>>>>>>>> brains, huh.... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regardless of who _created_ it, the fact remains that Google _owns_ it >>>>>>>>>> and is therefore legally allowed to take credit for what the company >>>>>>>>>> might have done before they took it over. In an advocate's mind, such a >>>>>>>>>> concept is foreign but people who live in reality understand this. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They own it and have changed it. And collect the data from it. And put the >>>>>>>>> ads on it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes, it is a Google tool now. No doubt. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I find it amazing how these lying Linux losers will even attempt to >>>>>>>> change the definition of words or manipulate the interpretation of laws >>>>>>>> to make Linux look good. It's like someone polishing a turd and putting >>>>>>>> a clearcoat on it in the hope that it will convince people that it's >>>>>>>> worth something. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Have you ever met an honest Linux user in any of these forums? >>>>>>> The Linux - FOSS community attracts pathological liars by the barge. >>>>>> >>>>>> And I kept falling for it. >>>>> >>>>> We all have. >>>> >>>> I WANTED to believe that these were the good guys but looking back, >>>> Microsoft has always been the one doing the good stuff. They hired my >>>> high school's best friend and gave him a primo job which was much >>>> deserved when NVIDIA passed on him, they gave us a great browser to >>>> replace the horrendous Netscape for free when we needed one, they gave >>>> free e-mail at a time when nobody could get an address anywhere but from >>>> their ISP. Now they're giving us shitloads of online space, an online >>>> calendar, a free upgrade to Windows 10 and even a free anti-virus in >>>> that operating system while Linux only offers us headaches within an >>>> ugly interface attached to gigantic losers who will only blame us if >>>> things don't work right. >>> >>> The first thing you learn after installing Linux is what a bunch of >>> liars, freaks and kooks fill the Linux community and blogosphere. >>> That comes after you learn how much Linux sucks of course. >> >> I have not counted A SINGLE media management program in Linux that was >> worth a damn. It has something like 32 but not one manages to do the >> whole job WELL. > > I wouldn't trust Linux to manage my media. That's just asking for > trouble. When I test Linux, I set up a directory and copy over a few > thousand mp3 files and let Linux perform it's "magic" on the copies > and not the originals. > > Linux never fails to fuck something up. > Tagging errors, corruption, lost files you name it. That's exactly what happened. Luckily, I always have a backup of my music on my cell phone and was able to recover everything. I could live without the tags (even though it's a nuisance for the operating system to remove them) but I can't live without the ratings I give the songs. I want the program to maintain that something is a 5-star or 3-star song and Lunix NEVER cares. >>> Linux is pure crap. It always has been and if things keep progressing >>> in a state of mass confusion it always will be. >>> >>> The interesting thing is that these so called Linux advocate, freaky >>> Friday Linux zealots always seem to be hanging around like gadflies >>> waiting to attack the person attempting to get help with Linux. >>> >>> These social outcasts will never admit Linux's faults, will never >>> point out another one of their cult who lies and certainly will never >>> tell the truth because they themselves are liars as well. >>> >>> And you can easily find this type of dysfunctional behavior all over >>> the net. >>> Post a negative Linux article and like a billion white blood cells >>> attacking a germ they will descend upon you as if you were Lizzie >>> Borden and just whacked their mother and father. >>> >>> Take a close look at these freaks. >>> Especially those in COLA. >>> These types didn't become kooks overnight. They were born like this >>> and their early years, childhood, formative years, are responsible for >>> their adult life and the path it has taken them on. >>> >>> What is really interesting is how they have all collected like one >>> huge pile of sewage in the septic tank of Linux. >>> There is a reason why Linux attracts this particular type of loser. >>> I don't know what it is, I doubt anyone really knows, but the facts >>> demonstrate the end result. >> >> Vile creatures these Linux losers. I imagine that they live in sewers. > > That's a good place for them. It keeps the stench away from normal > human beings. Except that they eat the excrement normally reserved for rats and the latter have started to protest. >>>>>> I've given Lunix so many damned chances since >>>>>> 1994 and it has done nothing but disappoint me or fuck up my partitions >>>>>> and hardware. >>>>> >>>>> As have had all of us. >>>> >>>> It was a lot of wasted time which I will simply never get back. >>> >>> The saying is "Linux is free when your time has no value". >>> If you read any of these forums you will quickly come to the >>> conclusion that Linux users fuck around with their computer a hell of >>> a lot more than they use it for productive work. >>> And while that is bad enough by itself, most of the time they are >>> fucking around and inventing complicated solutions for problems that >>> don't exist on other OS platforms. >>> >>> Linux is a huge waste of time. >>> That's a fact. >> >> Things that can EASILY be accomplished with proprietary programs or a >> proprietary operating system ALWAYS require something counter-intuitive >> and faulty in Linux to be accomplished. Just converting music is a mess >> and fucks up (a lot of my music files were corrupted using >> SoundConverter whereas ffmpeg lost the tag information) and handling >> e-mail encryption is a joke in comparison to Windows in Outlook. Truly >> pathetic stuff. > > I had Amarok decide all on it's own to auto-tag, or should I say > RE-auto-tag my entire collection. I never told it to do that. > Fortunately like I said above it fucked up copies and not the > originals. > It was probably some default setting somewhere that I missed. > I've never encountered a Windows program doing anything like that all > on it's own. Auto-tag is especially dangerous because it doesn't necessarily recognize a song properly and can end up renaming and re-tagging something like Welcome to the Jungle by Guns N' Roses to Copa Cabana by Barry Manilow. At least the programs which offer the feature in Windows ASK you if the changes they are about to make are logical. >>>>>> Every time I was told that I did this or that wrong or >>>>>> used the wrong distribution but even if I did EXACTLY what was >>>>>> recommended, the issues piled up one after the other. It is complete >>>>>> garbage and anyone who advocates it is nothing more than a lying loser. >>>>>> They might not like the label but it's no less true. >>>>> >>>>> The problem is the Linux losers will always blame everything but the >>>>> real source of the problem which is Linux. >>>>> >>>>> The label "Linux loser" is the perfect description of these freaks. >>>> >>>> There is no other way to describe a fat midget who cleans toilets for a >>>> living like William Poaster, a man-child married to a insect-like freak >>>> like Chris Ahlstrom and a stand-in for Jabba the Hutt like Scott Doty >>>> (vallor). >>> >>> William Poaster is a janitor? >>> That's priceless. >>> I thought the other guy was kidding when he said William Poaster won a >>> golden plunger award. >> >> It's all true. > > Fuck. > No wonder he is so bitter. Let's face it, people of normal > intelligence don't go through life aspiring to be a janitor. It's kind > of something one ends up in after failing at every other career. The janitors I know are all pretty nice people but yeah, let's face it, they're not renowned for their intelligence. Geoff "William Poaster" Fitton has yet to demonstrate any. >>> Chris Ahlstrom is really married? >>> I find that difficult to believe. >>> What kind of woman would marry an extreme loser like him? >> >> Jayne Ahlstrom. Here's a picture >> <http://frame.musc.edu/Apps/ProfileDirectory/ProfileImages/ahlstrjb.jpg> >> . In her spare time, she enjoys eating crickets and emasculating her >> husband. > > That's a woman? > Looks like a gay male. She's like a praying mantis to me. >>> I've already seen some pictures of vallor. He has a serious weight >>> problem. He should go on a diet of 500 calories a day immediately and >>> maybe in 2 years he will still be alive. >>> And what is with this "oblinux" weirdo-speak gibberish he posts? >>> Another Star Wars fanatic? >>> Linux attracts those screwballs as well as the Star Trek nuts. >>> Quite odd. >> >> Scott Doty never got over the fact that they stopped making Star Wars >> movies in the 1980s and did not need him to stand in for Jabba the Hutt >> anymore. When they started digitizing the fat fuck, he lost whatever >> marbles he had left and installed Linux. > > ROTFLMAO! > > I'd wager he ate his marbles. Along with everything else in sight. Some people would sell their mom for a quarter, Scott Doty just ate her. -- Silver Slimer The silver-tongued heel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 13:00 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Is that you, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <EZidnULnCuR6a5LKnZ2dnUU7-b2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #349871 |
On 2016-04-14, Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> wrote: > I find it amazing how these ... Dude, someone with your brain power would be chasing a dot I move all over the way with a laser pointer. I'm sure you and a dog that chases its own tail have much in common. Don't worry little man, if you catch on I'll give you a gold star. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 17:16 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Is that you, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <nep14r$13j$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #349883 |
On 2016-04-14 4:00 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-04-14, Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> wrote: >> I find it amazing how these ... > > Dude, someone with your brain power would be chasing a dot I move all > over the way with a laser pointer. I'm sure you and a dog that chases > its own tail have much in common. > > Don't worry little man, if you catch on I'll give you a gold star. Looking forward to it! -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 17:25 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Is that you, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <nep1lm$4kb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #349905 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:16:22 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 2016-04-14 4:00 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: >> On 2016-04-14, Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> wrote: >>> I find it amazing how these ... >> >> Dude, someone with your brain power would be chasing a dot I move all >> over the way with a laser pointer. I'm sure you and a dog that chases >> its own tail have much in common. >> >> Don't worry little man, if you catch on I'll give you a gold star. > > Looking forward to it! Coming from a Linux loser expect that "gold" to be iron disulfide (FeS2).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 09:28 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Is that you, Snit? |
| Message-ID | <34f76b00-6f47-416f-9d40-d4a2176af789@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #349871 |
On Thursday, April 14, 2016 at 12:46:03 PM UTC-6, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 2016-04-14 2:40 PM, Snit wrote: > > On 4/14/16, 8:00 AM, in article neob3d$c3m$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" > > <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: > > > >> On 2016-04-13 8:02 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: > >>> On 2016-04-13, Silver Slimer <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: > >>>> It's sad too because some of their products are awesome. Youtube, for > >>>> one, revolutionized the Internet no matter how much people might > >>>> downplay it. > >>> > >>> yeah, they wrote a check for $1.1 billion when they bought it. That took > >>> brains, huh.... > >> > >> Regardless of who _created_ it, the fact remains that Google _owns_ it > >> and is therefore legally allowed to take credit for what the company > >> might have done before they took it over. In an advocate's mind, such a > >> concept is foreign but people who live in reality understand this. > >> > > They own it and have changed it. And collect the data from it. And put the > > ads on it. > > > > Yes, it is a Google tool now. No doubt. > > I find it amazing how these lying Linux losers will even attempt to > change the definition of words or manipulate the interpretation of LOL! As written to Snit that's pretty funny ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 05:53 +0000 |
| Subject | The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting |
| Message-ID | <dn8pitF62o6U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #349731 |
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 19:39:57 -0400, "Silver Slimer" the jackass wrote: [snipakook] Oh look...the "Slimer" kook is back, and this time, nymshifting to stay out of killfiles. On ES, no less. Someone wanna 'splain things to him? -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 01:55 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting |
| Message-ID | <op.yfwaqf1vtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #349779 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 01:53:33 -0400, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 19:39:57 -0400, "Silver Slimer" the jackass wrote:
>
> [snipakook]
>
> Oh look...the "Slimer" kook is back, and this time, nymshifting to stay
> out of killfiles.
>
> On ES, no less.
>
> Someone wanna 'splain things to him?
>
well, first i'd need to inspect his gables.
--
have you heard about the lotusLoser?
he's a loser but he still keeps on tryin'...
2nd verse: (by: bender@the.future)
have you heard about the lotusLoser
beaten by the queen of pembroke each time
have you heard about the lotusLoser
he's a luser but he still keeps on cryin'...
-
LOL
well i guess if we went to:
http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/color-summarizer/
and gave it the URL to the image THAT YOU POSTED IN POST:
<617072d3bd042b9634ebeb7c28503997@dizum.com>
<http://i.imgur.com/gchDiBs.png>
I took that on my way to eat lunch. I tried to make an index card with
backward writing so the SPANKY-SPANKY! reflection would show up with
frontward writing, but apparently I can't write backward legibly, so
you gets what you gets."
it would say "definitely not green", right???
http://i.imgur.com/1CkNIDC.png
D'OH!!!!
*SPNAKITY-SPNAKITY*
-
"People didn't cause the Great Depression, Liberal ko0kTarD. Governmental
policy did." - Fakey in MID <7880b90ad2ecebe35ba01b4557597d80%40dizum.com>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Great_Depression
"The initial stock market crash triggered a "panic sell-off" that made the
stock market go even lower."
so... so the "government" panicked, snickers?
funny that a bona-fide conservative horatio alger hero type would want the
government stepping in to save the stock market.
"Current theories may be broadly classified into two main points of view
and several heterodox points of view.
First, there are demand-driven theories, from Keynesian and institutional
economists who argue that the depression was caused by a widespread loss
of confidence that led to underconsumption. The demand-driven theories
argue that the financial crisis following the 1929 crash led to a sudden
and persistent reduction in consumption and investment spending.[1] Once
panic and deflation set in, many people believed they could avoid further
losses by keeping clear of the markets. Holding money therefore became
profitable as prices dropped lower and a given amount of money bought ever
more goods, exacerbating the drop in demand.
Second, there are the monetarists, who believe that the Great Depression
started as an ordinary recession, but that significant policy mistakes by
monetary authorities (especially the Federal Reserve), caused a shrinking
of the money supply which greatly exacerbated the economic situation,
causing a recession to descend into the Great Depression. Related to this
explanation are those who point to debt deflation causing those who borrow
to owe ever more in real terms."
wait? what? no major "third" konservative k0okTheory blaming the
government for everything mentioned?
odd, that. eh, lotusLoser?
-
the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160408001051/http://i.imgur.com/e3OrQSq.png
-
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://i.imgur.com/Z4p1Z55.png
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 07:04 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting |
| Message-ID | <1h1vgbplh4cuvv2hufq0fc59ahbcrir5m9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #349779 |
vallor wrote: >On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 19:39:57 -0400, "Silver Slimer" the jackass wrote: > >[snipakook] > >Oh look...the "Slimer" kook is back, and this time, nymshifting to stay >out of killfiles. It didn't work, here... >On ES, no less. > >Someone wanna 'splain things to him? That it's best if he slices lengthwise, you mean? -- 'That's an extremely stupid "feature".' - some dumb fsck, critiquing the work of the designers of UNIX
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 12:17 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting |
| Message-ID | <neofl1$tja$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #349779 |
On 2016-04-14 1:53 AM, vallor wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 19:39:57 -0400, "Silver Slimer" the jackass wrote: > > [snipakook] > > Oh look...the "Slimer" kook is back, and this time, nymshifting to stay > out of killfiles. > > On ES, no less. > > Someone wanna 'splain things to him? I'm only changing e-mail addresses to piss losers like you off because you have none of my respect. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 09:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting |
| Message-ID | <6_udnexqKIpkW5LKnZ2dnUU7-N2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #349832 |
On 2016-04-14, Silver Slimer <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > I'm only changing e-mail addresses to piss losers like you off because > you have none of my respect. Respect is a two-way street. And anyway you're just making excuses. You're just an asshole and make up excuses to justify being an asshole. Stay behind the monitor little man. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 17:48 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting |
| Message-ID | <j8u4uc-47e.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #349835 |
It was reported that Marek Novotny posted: > On 2016-04-14, Silver Slimer <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >> I'm only changing e-mail addresses to piss losers like you off because >> you have none of my respect. > > Respect is a two-way street. And anyway you're just making excuses. > You're just an asshole and make up excuses to justify being an asshole. > Stay behind the monitor little man. AFAIC the trolling fuckwit can change his e-mail address as much as he likes. I only see his drivel *if* someone bothers to reply to the wintroll. -- openSUSE 13.2 64-bit KDE 4.14.9 Kernel: 4.5.0-10.1.gb98c3d3-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Apr 11 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux This message is virus free, as absolutely NO Micro$oft products were used in its preparation. "If you do want to clean your computer of malware, the first software to delete is Windows." http://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-microsoft.en.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 13:03 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting |
| Message-ID | <neoi9t$6q2$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #349835 |
On 2016-04-14 12:36 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-04-14, Silver Slimer <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >> I'm only changing e-mail addresses to piss losers like you off because >> you have none of my respect. > > Respect is a two-way street. And anyway you're just making excuses. > You're just an asshole and make up excuses to justify being an asshole. > Stay behind the monitor little man. I'm all but too willing to move away from the monitor, "big man." -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web