Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #320962 > unrolled thread

An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails!

Started byLloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com>
First post2015-09-15 19:04 +0000
Last post2015-09-16 15:11 -0500
Articles 20 on this page of 142 — 15 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 19:04 +0000
    Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-15 19:48 -0500
      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-15 20:57 -0400
        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 01:04 +0000
      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 01:02 +0000
        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-15 20:11 -0500
          Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 01:18 +0000
            Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-15 20:26 -0500
              Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 12:20 +0000
      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-16 10:12 -0500
        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-16 10:43 -0700
        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 18:25 +0000
          Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-16 21:50 +0000
            Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 22:16 +0000
              Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-16 22:27 +0000
                Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 22:35 +0000
                  Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-16 23:08 +0000
                    Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 23:18 +0000
                      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-16 23:35 +0000
                        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2015-09-16 18:46 -0500
                          Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-17 00:22 +0000
                            Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 00:44 +0000
                              Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-16 18:01 -0700
                                Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-17 09:36 +0200
                                  Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-17 14:06 +0200
                                    Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:39 +0000
                                      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-17 08:08 -0500
                                        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 10:39 -0700
                                      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 10:53 -0700
                                    Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 10:41 -0700
                                    Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-18 07:52 -0500
                                      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 07:57 -0700
                                        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-18 17:56 +0200
                                          Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 09:11 -0700
                                          Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-18 12:39 -0500
                                            Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 11:17 -0700
                                        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-18 12:46 -0400
                                          Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 10:26 -0700
                                    Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-18 15:24 +0200
                                      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-18 08:42 -0500
                                        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-18 16:04 +0200
                                          Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 08:01 -0700
                                      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 08:05 -0700
                                  Peter Köhlmann thinks UNIX did not exist before OS X Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 10:49 -0700
                                    Snit Michael Glasser lying his ass off (again) Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-17 21:47 +0200
                                      Re: Snit Michael Glasser lying his ass off (again) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 13:04 -0700
                                  Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-17 11:09 -0700
                                    Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2015-09-17 13:13 -0500
                                      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 13:07 -0700
                                        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-17 14:03 -0700
                              Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-17 03:25 +0000
                                Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2015-09-17 08:02 -0500
                                  Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-17 13:45 +0000
                                    Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 17:14 +0000
                            Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-16 17:33 -0700
                              Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-17 03:17 +0000
                                Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-16 20:50 -0700
                                  Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-17 09:44 +0200
                                    Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 10:52 -0700
                                      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-17 21:50 +0200
                                        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 13:04 -0700
                                        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 22:49 +0000
                                          Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 16:05 -0700
                                        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 19:25 -0500
                                          Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 17:33 -0700
                                  Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-17 14:23 +0000
                                    Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 10:43 -0700
                            Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-17 08:09 -0400
                              Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-17 13:50 +0000
                                Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 17:07 +0000
                                Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-17 22:03 -0400
                        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-16 17:24 -0700
                      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-17 01:40 +0200
                        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2015-09-16 18:46 -0500
                        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 00:45 +0000
                          Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 00:48 +0000
                            Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 23:55 -0500
                              Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:36 +0000
                                Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:44 +0000
                                Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 19:01 -0500
                                  Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 00:05 +0000
                                    Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 20:36 -0500
                                      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 18:44 -0700
                                      Re: An example of how/why bitter iCultists fail! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:55 +0000
                                        Re: An example of how/why bitter iCultists fail! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 18:00 +0000
                                        Re: An example of how/why bitter iCultists fail! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-18 13:56 -0500
                                          Re: An example of how/why bitter iCultists fail! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 19:11 +0000
                                          Re: An example of how/why bitter iCultists fail! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 13:13 -0700
                                          Re: An example of how/why bitter iCultists fail! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 20:42 +0000
                                            Re: An example of how/why bitter iCultists fail! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 13:59 -0700
                                            Re: An example of how/why bitter iCultists fail! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 21:07 +0000
                                              Re: An example of how/why bitter iCultists fail! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-18 15:47 -0600
                                              Re: An example of how/why bitter iCultists fail! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-18 17:17 -0700
                                                Re: An example of how/why bitter iCultists fail! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 17:40 -0700
                                              Re: An example of how/why bitter iCultists fail! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-18 17:24 -0700
                                        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-18 20:55 -0400
                              Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-18 07:49 -0500
                                Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 13:09 +0000
                                Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-18 09:26 -0400
                                  Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-18 10:01 -0400
                                Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:42 +0000
                                  Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:58 +0000
                          Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-16 18:02 -0700
                          Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 23:21 -0500
                            Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:34 +0000
                              Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 19:04 -0500
                    Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-16 19:44 -0400
                      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2015-09-16 18:48 -0500
                      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-17 03:32 +0000
                        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-16 20:53 -0700
                          Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-17 08:45 -0400
                            Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:51 +0000
                              Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 11:04 -0700
                            Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 10:55 -0700
                        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-17 08:40 -0400
                          Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-17 14:29 +0000
                            Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-17 12:35 -0400
                              Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-17 18:51 +0200
                                Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 17:05 +0000
                            Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 17:05 +0000
                  Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-16 17:22 -0700
        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-17 06:49 -0700
          Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-17 14:05 +0000
            Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-17 07:48 -0700
              Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-17 15:35 +0000
            Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-17 12:32 -0400
              Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-17 10:42 -0700
              Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-17 19:54 +0000
            Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 17:09 +0000
              Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-17 19:48 +0000
                Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2015-09-17 14:59 -0500
                  Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-17 22:15 +0000
                    Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 22:19 +0000
                      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-17 22:33 +0000
                        Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 15:54 -0700
                      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 15:55 -0700
                      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-17 19:20 -0700
                    Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 15:52 -0700
                  Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 19:24 -0500
                Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 13:06 -0700
              Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-17 13:07 -0700
      Re: An example of how/why commercial linux desktop fails! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-16 15:11 -0500

Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8  Next page →


#321200

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2015-09-17 00:22 +0000
Message-ID<adfmn8v.dj@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#321195
Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote:
> On 16 Sep 2015 23:35, owl wrote:
>> Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote:
>>

>>> Are you really that dumb?
>>
>> That's pretty bold, coming from a Mactard.
>>
>>
> You mean a 'mactard' that uses OSX, Linux, Windows 8/10, iOS, Android and
> Windows Phone?  I'd say that makes me much more knowledgeable about the
> comparisons of the various OS's.

Lloyd, I have currently about 70 different virtual machines composed
of various OSes including NetBSD, OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Solaris, multiple
versions of Linux and practically every version of Windows and Windows
Server ever made.  I've got some old SCO Open Server and BeOS disks lying
around somewhere too.  Maybe I'll VM them one day.  I am quite familiar
with the different computing environments that are now (and have been)
available.  I've used Macs at work and *hated* them, because I like Unix
and OS X just doesn't cut it as a Unix.  I've been using Linux for about
20 years now, and I haven't found a reason not to like it yet.

So if you come from a Windows/Mack environment and dabble with Linux
a little and then all you do is whine about how it's not dumbed down
enough for you, then yeah, you're a Mactard.

Oh, and Android, Windows Phone, and iOS are irrelevant to a discussion of
desktop OSes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321203

FromLloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-17 00:44 +0000
Message-ID<d5ugntF2om4U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#321200
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:22:45 +0000, owl wrote:

> Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> wrote:
>> On 16 Sep 2015 23:35, owl wrote:
>>> Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Are you really that dumb?
>>>
>>> That's pretty bold, coming from a Mactard.
>>>
>>>
>> You mean a 'mactard' that uses OSX, Linux, Windows 8/10, iOS, Android
>> and Windows Phone?  I'd say that makes me much more knowledgeable about
>> the comparisons of the various OS's.
> 
> Lloyd, I have currently about 70 different virtual machines composed of
> various OSes including NetBSD, OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Solaris, multiple
> versions of Linux and practically every version of Windows and Windows
> Server ever made.  I've got some old SCO Open Server and BeOS disks
> lying around somewhere too.  Maybe I'll VM them one day.  I am quite
> familiar with the different computing environments that are now (and
> have been) available.  I've used Macs at work and *hated* them, because
> I like Unix and OS X just doesn't cut it as a Unix.  I've been using
> Linux for about 20 years now, and I haven't found a reason not to like
> it yet.
> 
> So if you come from a Windows/Mack environment and dabble with Linux a
> little and then all you do is whine about how it's not dumbed down
> enough for you, then yeah, you're a Mactard.
> 
> Oh, and Android, Windows Phone, and iOS are irrelevant to a discussion
> of desktop OSes.

I think you miss my point.  I have no issues with Linux from a technical 
viewpoint.  I'm talking about what it takes to get in accepted in a 
commercial/consumer marketplace.  It doesn't need dumbing down for that 
and frankly changing UIs around isn't all that big a deal to me.  But the 
various distros and UIs make for a terrible marketing problem.

I came from a TurboDOS (MP/M alike) background and moved to DOS/Windows 
as the changing market killed off the S-100 systems we were building and 
selling.  Macs didn't come into play until OSX came out in public beta, 
never liked previous versions of MacOS at all.  Used and loved OS/2 when 
those particular wars were going on.

I built and configured Unix systems back in the day too.  We didn't do 
much Unix business as our target markets were small business and later 
schools.  At the time Unix just wasn't the right product for much of that.

So I'm not a WinDrone or MacTard, those came much later in my various 
careers.




-- 
Lloyd

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321208

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-09-16 18:01 -0700
Message-ID<D21F5F14.5C151%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#321203
On 9/16/15, 5:44 PM, in article d5ugntF2om4U1@mid.individual.net, "Lloyd
Parsons" <lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote:

>> So if you come from a Windows/Mack environment and dabble with Linux a
>> little and then all you do is whine about how it's not dumbed down
>> enough for you, then yeah, you're a Mactard.
>> 
>> Oh, and Android, Windows Phone, and iOS are irrelevant to a discussion
>> of desktop OSes.
> 
> I think you miss my point.  I have no issues with Linux from a technical
> viewpoint.  I'm talking about what it takes to get in accepted in a
> commercial/consumer marketplace.  It doesn't need dumbing down for that
> and frankly changing UIs around isn't all that big a deal to me.  But the
> various distros and UIs make for a terrible marketing problem.
> 
> I came from a TurboDOS (MP/M alike) background and moved to DOS/Windows
> as the changing market killed off the S-100 systems we were building and
> selling.  Macs didn't come into play until OSX came out in public beta,
> never liked previous versions of MacOS at all.  Used and loved OS/2 when
> those particular wars were going on.
> 
> I built and configured Unix systems back in the day too.  We didn't do
> much Unix business as our target markets were small business and later
> schools.  At the time Unix just wasn't the right product for much of that.
> 
> So I'm not a WinDrone or MacTard, those came much later in my various
> careers.

I am one of the few people who literally started working with UNIX, PCs, and
Macs all on the same day (sometime in Sept. 1987). Maybe that ties into my
perspective that the OS wars are a bit silly, that each has benefits, and
that people are best off knowing some of each and using what they like based
on an informed position.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321233

FromPeter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Date2015-09-17 09:36 +0200
Message-ID<mtdqe5$isu$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#321208
Snit wrote:

> On 9/16/15, 5:44 PM, in article d5ugntF2om4U1@mid.individual.net, "Lloyd
> Parsons" <lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>> So if you come from a Windows/Mack environment and dabble with Linux a
>>> little and then all you do is whine about how it's not dumbed down
>>> enough for you, then yeah, you're a Mactard.
>>> 
>>> Oh, and Android, Windows Phone, and iOS are irrelevant to a discussion
>>> of desktop OSes.
>> 
>> I think you miss my point.  I have no issues with Linux from a technical
>> viewpoint.  I'm talking about what it takes to get in accepted in a
>> commercial/consumer marketplace.  It doesn't need dumbing down for that
>> and frankly changing UIs around isn't all that big a deal to me.  But the
>> various distros and UIs make for a terrible marketing problem.
>> 
>> I came from a TurboDOS (MP/M alike) background and moved to DOS/Windows
>> as the changing market killed off the S-100 systems we were building and
>> selling.  Macs didn't come into play until OSX came out in public beta,
>> never liked previous versions of MacOS at all.  Used and loved OS/2 when
>> those particular wars were going on.
>> 
>> I built and configured Unix systems back in the day too.  We didn't do
>> much Unix business as our target markets were small business and later
>> schools.  At the time Unix just wasn't the right product for much of
>> that.
>> 
>> So I'm not a WinDrone or MacTard, those came much later in my various
>> careers.
> 
> I am one of the few people who literally started working with UNIX, PCs,
> and Macs all on the same day (sometime in Sept. 1987). 

Pull the other one. At that time there was no OSX. That came 14 years later

So you had no "Unix" to play with, and the Macs of that time could do 
absolutely nothing the other PCs did. It ran 0% of the PC software

So quit boasting and lying about your "achievements". Its simply pathetic

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321246

FromMelzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>
Date2015-09-17 14:06 +0200
Message-ID<mteac6$tie$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#321233
On 9/17/15 9:36 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> Snit wrote:
>
>> On 9/16/15, 5:44 PM, in article d5ugntF2om4U1@mid.individual.net, "Lloyd
>> Parsons" <lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> So if you come from a Windows/Mack environment and dabble with Linux a
>>>> little and then all you do is whine about how it's not dumbed down
>>>> enough for you, then yeah, you're a Mactard.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, and Android, Windows Phone, and iOS are irrelevant to a discussion
>>>> of desktop OSes.
>>>
>>> I think you miss my point.  I have no issues with Linux from a technical
>>> viewpoint.  I'm talking about what it takes to get in accepted in a
>>> commercial/consumer marketplace.  It doesn't need dumbing down for that
>>> and frankly changing UIs around isn't all that big a deal to me.  But the
>>> various distros and UIs make for a terrible marketing problem.
>>>
>>> I came from a TurboDOS (MP/M alike) background and moved to DOS/Windows
>>> as the changing market killed off the S-100 systems we were building and
>>> selling.  Macs didn't come into play until OSX came out in public beta,
>>> never liked previous versions of MacOS at all.  Used and loved OS/2 when
>>> those particular wars were going on.
>>>
>>> I built and configured Unix systems back in the day too.  We didn't do
>>> much Unix business as our target markets were small business and later
>>> schools.  At the time Unix just wasn't the right product for much of
>>> that.
>>>
>>> So I'm not a WinDrone or MacTard, those came much later in my various
>>> careers.
>>
>> I am one of the few people who literally started working with UNIX, PCs,
>> and Macs all on the same day (sometime in Sept. 1987).
>
> Pull the other one. At that time there was no OSX. That came 14 years later
>
> So you had no "Unix" to play with, and the Macs of that time could do
> absolutely nothing the other PCs did. It ran 0% of the PC software
>
> So quit boasting and lying about your "achievements". Its simply pathetic
>
Who knows what Snit thinks when he says "Unix" ;)
He should be master of command line by now, but he don't know to use it 
still ;)
I first saw AT&T Unix on Motorola workstation and it aint'got GUI, just 
wyse terminals ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321267

Fromronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-17 12:39 +0000
Message-ID<mtec9t$imu$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#321246
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 14:06:30 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote:

> Who knows what Snit thinks when he says "Unix"

Heck, for that matter, who knows what "Snit" "thinks" when he says the 
word "blue?"

-- 
Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321279

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2015-09-17 08:08 -0500
Message-ID<olelvah8r0d13trbouelh1avibn499tbbl@4ax.com>
In reply to#321267
ronb wrote:

> Melzzzzz wrote:
>>
>> Who knows what Snit thinks when he says "Unix"
>
>Heck, for that matter, who knows what "Snit" "thinks" when he says the 
>word "blue?"

For some people, the label is more important than the function.

Similar to having the fruity logo on one's machine.

-- 
"This is what happens when you have a user base of 7 people all of
whom wont help QA it."  -  "Hadron", sneering at OpenSUSE

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321309

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-09-17 10:39 -0700
Message-ID<D22048E4.5C306%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#321279
On 9/17/15, 6:08 AM, in article olelvah8r0d13trbouelh1avibn499tbbl@4ax.com,
"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

> ronb wrote:
> 
>> Melzzzzz wrote:
>>> 
>>> Who knows what Snit thinks when he says "Unix"
>> 
>> Heck, for that matter, who knows what "Snit" "thinks" when he says the
>> word "blue?"
> 
> For some people, the label is more important than the function.
> 
> Similar to having the fruity logo on one's machine.

I have no clue why you and your herd obsess over logos. Maybe you are
sexually attracted to Tux?


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321317

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-09-17 10:53 -0700
Message-ID<D2204C29.5C323%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#321267
On 9/17/15, 5:39 AM, in article mtec9t$imu$5@dont-email.me, "ronb"
<ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 14:06:30 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote:
> 
>> Who knows what Snit thinks when he says "Unix"
> 
> Heck, for that matter, who knows what "Snit" "thinks" when he says the
> word "blue?"

Hey, at least unlike Peter I do not think UNIX did not exist until Apple
released OS X!

That was a great post by him!


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321310

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-09-17 10:41 -0700
Message-ID<D220493F.5C308%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#321246
On 9/17/15, 5:06 AM, in article mteac6$tie$1@news.albasani.net, "Melzzzzz"
<mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:

... 
>>> I am one of the few people who literally started working with UNIX, PCs,
>>> and Macs all on the same day (sometime in Sept. 1987).
>> 
>> Pull the other one. At that time there was no OSX. That came 14 years later
>> 
>> So you had no "Unix" to play with, and the Macs of that time could do
>> absolutely nothing the other PCs did. It ran 0% of the PC software
>> 
>> So quit boasting and lying about your "achievements". Its simply pathetic
>> 
> Who knows what Snit thinks when he says "Unix" ;)

But we do know Peter thinks of OS X! He made that clear... I noted how I
used UNIX in 1987 and he jumped to OS X!

LOL!

...


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321434

FromJEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet>
Date2015-09-18 07:52 -0500
Message-ID<slrnmvo28e.mbk.jedi@nomad.mishnet>
In reply to#321246
On 2015-09-17, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> On 9/17/15 9:36 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/16/15, 5:44 PM, in article d5ugntF2om4U1@mid.individual.net, "Lloyd
>>> Parsons" <lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>

[deletia]

>>> I am one of the few people who literally started working with UNIX, PCs,
>>> and Macs all on the same day (sometime in Sept. 1987).
>>
>> Pull the other one. At that time there was no OSX. That came 14 years later
>>
>> So you had no "Unix" to play with, and the Macs of that time could do
>> absolutely nothing the other PCs did. It ran 0% of the PC software
>>
>> So quit boasting and lying about your "achievements". Its simply pathetic
>>
> Who knows what Snit thinks when he says "Unix" ;)
> He should be master of command line by now, but he don't know to use it 
> still ;)
> I first saw AT&T Unix on Motorola workstation and it aint'got GUI, just 
> wyse terminals ;)

    My 2nd Unix had graphics and a GUI (in 1988).

    It was my first Unix that had not GUI. Although I wasn't really using
the shell on that one. I was just using BBS software that just happened to
run on Unix.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321456

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-09-18 07:57 -0700
Message-ID<D2217480.5C475%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#321434
On 9/18/15, 5:52 AM, in article slrnmvo28e.mbk.jedi@nomad.mishnet,
"JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote:

> On 2015-09-17, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>> On 9/17/15 9:36 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>> Snit wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 9/16/15, 5:44 PM, in article d5ugntF2om4U1@mid.individual.net, "Lloyd
>>>> Parsons" <lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
> 
> [deletia]
> 
>>>> I am one of the few people who literally started working with UNIX, PCs,
>>>> and Macs all on the same day (sometime in Sept. 1987).
>>> 
>>> Pull the other one. At that time there was no OSX. That came 14 years later
>>> 
>>> So you had no "Unix" to play with, and the Macs of that time could do
>>> absolutely nothing the other PCs did. It ran 0% of the PC software
>>> 
>>> So quit boasting and lying about your "achievements". Its simply pathetic
>>> 
>> Who knows what Snit thinks when he says "Unix" ;)
>> He should be master of command line by now, but he don't know to use it
>> still ;)
>> I first saw AT&T Unix on Motorola workstation and it aint'got GUI, just
>> wyse terminals ;)
> 
>     My 2nd Unix had graphics and a GUI (in 1988).
> 
>     It was my first Unix that had not GUI. Although I wasn't really using
> the shell on that one. I was just using BBS software that just happened to
> run on Unix.

I started using Macs, PCs, and UNIX on the same day in 1987 when I got a job
working in a computer lab at a college (UNLV). I had worked with Apple IIe
systems before but had never touched any of those. Still managed to get a
job as a computer tutor and had to learn each to help others. Six years
later I was running an education cluster of labs (three of them) and running
classes for high school students and seminars for college instructors.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321466

FromPeter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Date2015-09-18 17:56 +0200
Message-ID<mthc2u$9cr$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#321456
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled:

> On 9/18/15, 5:52 AM, in article slrnmvo28e.mbk.jedi@nomad.mishnet,
> "JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote:
> 
>> On 2015-09-17, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>> On 9/17/15 9:36 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 9/16/15, 5:44 PM, in article d5ugntF2om4U1@mid.individual.net,
>>>>> "Lloyd Parsons" <lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>> 
>> [deletia]
>> 
>>>>> I am one of the few people who literally started working with UNIX,
>>>>> PCs, and Macs all on the same day (sometime in Sept. 1987).
>>>> 
>>>> Pull the other one. At that time there was no OSX. That came 14 years
>>>> later
>>>> 
>>>> So you had no "Unix" to play with, and the Macs of that time could do
>>>> absolutely nothing the other PCs did. It ran 0% of the PC software
>>>> 
>>>> So quit boasting and lying about your "achievements". Its simply
>>>> pathetic
>>>> 
>>> Who knows what Snit thinks when he says "Unix" ;)
>>> He should be master of command line by now, but he don't know to use it
>>> still ;)
>>> I first saw AT&T Unix on Motorola workstation and it aint'got GUI, just
>>> wyse terminals ;)
>> 
>>     My 2nd Unix had graphics and a GUI (in 1988).
>> 
>>     It was my first Unix that had not GUI. Although I wasn't really using
>> the shell on that one. I was just using BBS software that just happened
>> to run on Unix.
> 
> I started using Macs, PCs, and UNIX on the same day in 1987 when I got a
> job 

Quit lying. You would not know what a "job" (much less a "paid job") is when 
it bit you right into your unwashed stinking ass

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321474

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-09-18 09:11 -0700
Message-ID<D22185B2.5C4A2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#321466
On 9/18/15, 8:56 AM, in article mthc2u$9cr$2@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann"
<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:

>>>> Who knows what Snit thinks when he says "Unix" ;)
>>>> He should be master of command line by now, but he don't know to use it
>>>> still ;)
>>>> I first saw AT&T Unix on Motorola workstation and it aint'got GUI, just
>>>> wyse terminals ;)
>>> 
>>>     My 2nd Unix had graphics and a GUI (in 1988).
>>> 
>>>     It was my first Unix that had not GUI. Although I wasn't really using
>>> the shell on that one. I was just using BBS software that just happened
>>> to run on Unix.
>> 
>> I started using Macs, PCs, and UNIX on the same day in 1987 when I got a
>> job 
> 
> Quit lying. You would not know what a "job" (much less a "paid job") is when
> it bit you right into your unwashed stinking ass

See, all you can do is make stories up when I post direct quotes of you
denying UNIX existed until OS X and quotes of me talking about UNIX from
well before it (sorry, no quotes from 1987, as far as I know there is no
Usenet archive of all posts from back then... Google certainly does not have
them all):

  Peter Köhlmann:
    -----
    | I am one of the few people who literally started working with
    | UNIX, PCs, and Macs all on the same day (sometime in Sept.
    | 1987). 
    Pull the other one. At that time there was no OSX. That came 14
    years later So you had no "Unix" to play with...
    -----
Peter shows he thought UNIX did not exist before Apple released OS X!
In COLA in 1995 I spoke of my UNIX use: <https://goo.gl/TCRJCd>.

Message-ID: mtdqe5$isu$1@dont-email.me
<https://goo.gl/sXbJLw>


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321509

FromJEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet>
Date2015-09-18 12:39 -0500
Message-ID<slrnmvoj1l.h9m.jedi@nomad.mishnet>
In reply to#321466
On 2015-09-18, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled:
>
>> On 9/18/15, 5:52 AM, in article slrnmvo28e.mbk.jedi@nomad.mishnet,
>> "JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2015-09-17, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>> On 9/17/15 9:36 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 9/16/15, 5:44 PM, in article d5ugntF2om4U1@mid.individual.net,
>>>>>> "Lloyd Parsons" <lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> [deletia]
>>> 
>>>>>> I am one of the few people who literally started working with UNIX,
>>>>>> PCs, and Macs all on the same day (sometime in Sept. 1987).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Pull the other one. At that time there was no OSX. That came 14 years
>>>>> later
>>>>> 
>>>>> So you had no "Unix" to play with, and the Macs of that time could do
>>>>> absolutely nothing the other PCs did. It ran 0% of the PC software
>>>>> 
>>>>> So quit boasting and lying about your "achievements". Its simply
>>>>> pathetic
>>>>> 
>>>> Who knows what Snit thinks when he says "Unix" ;)
>>>> He should be master of command line by now, but he don't know to use it
>>>> still ;)
>>>> I first saw AT&T Unix on Motorola workstation and it aint'got GUI, just
>>>> wyse terminals ;)
>>> 
>>>     My 2nd Unix had graphics and a GUI (in 1988).
>>> 
>>>     It was my first Unix that had not GUI. Although I wasn't really using
>>> the shell on that one. I was just using BBS software that just happened
>>> to run on Unix.
>> 
>> I started using Macs, PCs, and UNIX on the same day in 1987 when I got a
>> job 
>
> Quit lying. You would not know what a "job" (much less a "paid job") is when 
> it bit you right into your unwashed stinking ass

   He should have been exposed to all of those earlier than "when he got a job".

   Although I didn't see a NeXT machine until "I got a job". DOS and Macs were
common enough out in the wild and Unix was big in academia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321516

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-09-18 11:17 -0700
Message-ID<D221A367.5C4ED%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#321509
On 9/18/15, 10:39 AM, in article slrnmvoj1l.h9m.jedi@nomad.mishnet,
"JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote:

>>>>     My 2nd Unix had graphics and a GUI (in 1988).
>>>> 
>>>>     It was my first Unix that had not GUI. Although I wasn't really using
>>>> the shell on that one. I was just using BBS software that just happened
>>>> to run on Unix.
>>> 
>>> I started using Macs, PCs, and UNIX on the same day in 1987 when I got a
>>> job 
>> 
>> Quit lying. You would not know what a "job" (much less a "paid job") is when
>> it bit you right into your unwashed stinking ass
> 
>    He should have been exposed to all of those earlier than "when he got a
> job".
> 
>    Although I didn't see a NeXT machine until "I got a job". DOS and Macs were
> common enough out in the wild and Unix was big in academia.

In 1987 I got a job working in a computer lab at UNLV where they had all
three (PCs, Macs, and UNIX systems).

I had used Apple IIe systems before that but none of those.

Peter is just trolling to troll... and as he did so showed he did not even
think UNIX existed until OS X:

  Peter Köhlmann <https://goo.gl/sXbJLw>:
    -----
    | I am one of the few people who literally started working with
    | UNIX, PCs, and Macs all on the same day (sometime in Sept.
    | 1987). 
    Pull the other one. At that time there was no OSX. That came 14
    years later So you had no "Unix" to play with...
    -----
Peter shows he thought UNIX did not exist before Apple released OS X!
In COLA in 1995 I spoke of my UNIX use: <https://goo.gl/TCRJCd>.



-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321478

From"A.M" <.m@nsn.s>
Date2015-09-18 12:46 -0400
Message-ID<mthf20$mhg$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#321456
On 2015-09-18 10:57 AM, Snit wrote:
> On 9/18/15, 5:52 AM, in article slrnmvo28e.mbk.jedi@nomad.mishnet,
> "JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote:
> 
>> On 2015-09-17, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>> On 9/17/15 9:36 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/16/15, 5:44 PM, in article d5ugntF2om4U1@mid.individual.net, "Lloyd
>>>>> Parsons" <lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>
>> [deletia]
>>
>>>>> I am one of the few people who literally started working with UNIX, PCs,
>>>>> and Macs all on the same day (sometime in Sept. 1987).
>>>>
>>>> Pull the other one. At that time there was no OSX. That came 14 years later
>>>>
>>>> So you had no "Unix" to play with, and the Macs of that time could do
>>>> absolutely nothing the other PCs did. It ran 0% of the PC software
>>>>
>>>> So quit boasting and lying about your "achievements". Its simply pathetic
>>>>
>>> Who knows what Snit thinks when he says "Unix" ;)
>>> He should be master of command line by now, but he don't know to use it
>>> still ;)
>>> I first saw AT&T Unix on Motorola workstation and it aint'got GUI, just
>>> wyse terminals ;)
>>
>>     My 2nd Unix had graphics and a GUI (in 1988).
>>
>>     It was my first Unix that had not GUI. Although I wasn't really using
>> the shell on that one. I was just using BBS software that just happened to
>> run on Unix.
> 
> I started using Macs, PCs, and UNIX on the same day in 1987 when I got a job
> working in a computer lab at a college (UNLV). I had worked with Apple IIe
> systems before but had never touched any of those. Still managed to get a
> job as a computer tutor and had to learn each to help others. Six years
> later I was running an education cluster of labs (three of them) and running
> classes for high school students and seminars for college instructors.

Is there any reason you are no longer doing the same kind of job? You'd
make an excellent high school teacher in my opinion.


-- 
A.M

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321491

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-09-18 10:26 -0700
Message-ID<D2219760.5C4BF%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#321478
On 9/18/15, 9:46 AM, in article mthf20$mhg$1@dont-email.me, "A.M" <.m@nsn.s>
wrote:

>>>> Who knows what Snit thinks when he says "Unix" ;)
>>>> He should be master of command line by now, but he don't know to use it
>>>> still ;)
>>>> I first saw AT&T Unix on Motorola workstation and it aint'got GUI, just
>>>> wyse terminals ;)
>>> 
>>>     My 2nd Unix had graphics and a GUI (in 1988).
>>> 
>>>     It was my first Unix that had not GUI. Although I wasn't really using
>>> the shell on that one. I was just using BBS software that just happened to
>>> run on Unix.
>> 
>> I started using Macs, PCs, and UNIX on the same day in 1987 when I got a job
>> working in a computer lab at a college (UNLV). I had worked with Apple IIe
>> systems before but had never touched any of those. Still managed to get a
>> job as a computer tutor and had to learn each to help others. Six years
>> later I was running an education cluster of labs (three of them) and running
>> classes for high school students and seminars for college instructors.
> 
> Is there any reason you are no longer doing the same kind of job? You'd
> make an excellent high school teacher in my opinion.

Thanks. I did teach face to face for years after that, both in K-12 (private
and "normal" public and charter), and also in the corporate world.

Health issues made it hard for me to work in face-to-face classes for some
time... not going to go into my specific symptoms in here (already get
attacked for my health issues) but I have something similar to this:

<http://www.dinet.org/index.php/information-resources/pots-place/pots-sympto
ms>

Mine is deemed "atypical" in that some of my testing results were bizarre
even for what is "expected" with dysautonomia. They gave me a test to rule
out MS... part of that testing was having electrode needles shoved into
muscles and then testing electrical speed and strength. In MS those tend to
be reduced. For me I was off-the-charts high... the Mayo clinic (where I was
tested) had never seen anything like it.

I have done some face to face classes now that I better understand what is
going on and how to treat it... but there really is no cure and I can only
manage symptoms. A big part of it was increasing salt and fluid intake (I
drink at least 10.5 cups of water a day now... usually more... part of my
challenge is my body works to dehydrate itself).



-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321440

FromPeter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Date2015-09-18 15:24 +0200
Message-ID<mth363$60e$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#321246
Melzzzzz wrote:

> On 9/17/15 9:36 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/16/15, 5:44 PM, in article d5ugntF2om4U1@mid.individual.net, "Lloyd
>>> Parsons" <lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> So if you come from a Windows/Mack environment and dabble with Linux a
>>>>> little and then all you do is whine about how it's not dumbed down
>>>>> enough for you, then yeah, you're a Mactard.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, and Android, Windows Phone, and iOS are irrelevant to a discussion
>>>>> of desktop OSes.
>>>>
>>>> I think you miss my point.  I have no issues with Linux from a
>>>> technical
>>>> viewpoint.  I'm talking about what it takes to get in accepted in a
>>>> commercial/consumer marketplace.  It doesn't need dumbing down for that
>>>> and frankly changing UIs around isn't all that big a deal to me.  But
>>>> the various distros and UIs make for a terrible marketing problem.
>>>>
>>>> I came from a TurboDOS (MP/M alike) background and moved to DOS/Windows
>>>> as the changing market killed off the S-100 systems we were building
>>>> and
>>>> selling.  Macs didn't come into play until OSX came out in public beta,
>>>> never liked previous versions of MacOS at all.  Used and loved OS/2
>>>> when those particular wars were going on.
>>>>
>>>> I built and configured Unix systems back in the day too.  We didn't do
>>>> much Unix business as our target markets were small business and later
>>>> schools.  At the time Unix just wasn't the right product for much of
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> So I'm not a WinDrone or MacTard, those came much later in my various
>>>> careers.
>>>
>>> I am one of the few people who literally started working with UNIX, PCs,
>>> and Macs all on the same day (sometime in Sept. 1987).
>>
>> Pull the other one. At that time there was no OSX. That came 14 years
>> later
>>
>> So you had no "Unix" to play with, and the Macs of that time could do
>> absolutely nothing the other PCs did. It ran 0% of the PC software
>>
>> So quit boasting and lying about your "achievements". Its simply pathetic
>>
> Who knows what Snit thinks when he says "Unix" ;)

What should he think? He is lying
By 1987 there was no OpenSource unix around, they were all commercial.
And they were expensive. Snit Michael Glasser would never have the means to 
buy a MacIntosh then, plus a machine powerful enough to run a Unix of that 
time. The Mac would have been expensive enough, but a Unix machine (with the 
price of a commercial Unix) would have been way past his limited "funds" he 
was leeching off his wife.
And what would he have used it for? The Unix machines of that time were 
nothing a idiot like that Glasser swine would have had any use for. And he 
could not (and still can't) program his way out of a wet paper bag. So that 
route was also not available to him

I know how the Unix of that time looked. I worked professionally with Unix 
machines (also with the only Multics machine in germany) and I had a Unix 
machine at home, running a MicroPort Unix.
Glasser would not have the faintest of clues how to do *anything* with such 
a machine

> He should be master of command line by now, but he don't know to use it
> still ;)
> I first saw AT&T Unix on Motorola workstation and it aint'got GUI, just
> wyse terminals ;)

Because that was the norm then. X11 was released in September 1987, the 
previous X version X10 was incompatible to it. But it was still commercial, 
and the configuration would have been *way* beyond the capabilities of the 
"worst IT teacher of all time"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#321448

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2015-09-18 08:42 -0500
Message-ID<p15ovap8fg5aop2s2dh3abkq9ad6tq0ba5@4ax.com>
In reply to#321440
Peter Köhlmann wrote:

>I know how the Unix of that time looked. I worked professionally with Unix 
>machines (also with the only Multics machine in germany) and I had a Unix 
>machine at home, running a MicroPort Unix.

Well then, how is that you still don't know how to view a youtube
video?    
  
  :-D

-- 
"Peter admits viewing a YouTube video is too challenging for him! LOL!
That is just priceless!"  -  some thing, that no one can quote lying

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web