Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366298 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-22 20:04 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-08-25 08:38 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 382 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:35 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:47 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:51 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:07 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:32 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:38 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 22:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 15:22 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 23:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 16:13 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 09:11 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:22 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 09:37 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:54 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 10:14 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:21 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 10:29 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:43 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:03 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:51 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:17 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:05 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:51 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:01 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 18:27 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:46 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:17 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:07 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:41 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 20:06 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 00:13 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 20:33 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 01:24 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:14 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:26 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:10 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-26 09:07 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 13:37 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-26 09:56 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:42 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:23 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:29 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:41 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:23 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:17 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:08 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:17 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:32 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 09:24 -0700
Re: Another day chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-26 11:27 -0500
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:36 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:45 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:52 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 13:43 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:18 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 14:39 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 18:42 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 17:24 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 00:09 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 17:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:29 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:08 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:26 -0600
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-27 04:21 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 21:46 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 05:15 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 05:42 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 00:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:09 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:27 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:06 -0700
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 09:20 +0200
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 10:04 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:06 -0700
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 10:23 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:39 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:09 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:27 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:10 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 21:58 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 13:17 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:28 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:15 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:38 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 22:22 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 13:37 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-27 19:10 -0400
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 03:20 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:35 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:16 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 10:03 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:02 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:19 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 15:34 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 19:03 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:28 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:27 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:06 -0700
Re: Another day -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-27 15:30 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:20 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:24 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:01 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:42 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 07:39 -0700
Re: Another day William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-08-28 16:22 +0100
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 09:50 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 15:29 -0400
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 20:16 +0000
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 17:40 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 15:14 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 18:19 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:18 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:40 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:42 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:44 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:56 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:59 -0400
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 18:16 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:08 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:17 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-29 09:06 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:42 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 08:12 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 11:50 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 10:00 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 19:22 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 16:57 -0700
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-29 18:39 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 15:43 -0700
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 23:12 +0000
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 23:15 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:09 -0700
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-29 20:52 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 18:13 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-29 19:34 -0400
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 01:49 +0200
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 01:46 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:21 -0700
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 02:26 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:33 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-30 09:16 -0400
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 15:26 +0200
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-28 12:38 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:16 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 14:23 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:20 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 15:35 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 18:38 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 01:50 +0200
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 20:13 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 09:19 +0200
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:35 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:15 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-29 11:02 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 08:08 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:10 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:21 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:36 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:43 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:00 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:08 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:32 +0000
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:39 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:04 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:39 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:53 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 14:26 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 12:23 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:06 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 19:11 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:22 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:11 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:29 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:12 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 19:19 +0000
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:20 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:27 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 14:04 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:18 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:40 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:26 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:37 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:42 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:49 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 14:08 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:18 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:47 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 12:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:13 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:57 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:31 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:44 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 23:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 16:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:25 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:40 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:22 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:39 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:59 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:41 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:14 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:50 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:39 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 12:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:44 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:17 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:07 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:02 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:59 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:25 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:16 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:16 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:34 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:09 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:08 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:10 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:28 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:12 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:03 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:20 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:41 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 12:29 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:55 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:11 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 13:20 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:33 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:45 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:50 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:02 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:54 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:10 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:19 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:32 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 10:54 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 11:08 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 12:03 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 12:47 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:19 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 11:59 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:16 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:59 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:13 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:18 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:29 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:14 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:33 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 07:56 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:23 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:43 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:53 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:10 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:22 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:26 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:36 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:46 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:58 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:14 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:18 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:47 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:24 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:48 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 05:06 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:27 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:24 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:34 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:14 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:00 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:58 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 09:24 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:31 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 12:16 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:51 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 13:17 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:56 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 20:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:16 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:49 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:48 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:09 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:55 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:13 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:15 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:44 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:22 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:48 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 07:57 -0400
Re: Another day -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 06:41 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:35 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:51 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:17 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 13:03 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:36 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:09 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 09:27 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:33 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:44 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:44 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:14 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:10 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:48 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:16 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:24 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:28 -0600
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-25 07:10 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:46 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:28 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:54 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:47 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:08 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:45 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:03 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:12 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:09 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:37 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:50 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:07 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 19:23 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:25 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:44 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:47 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:58 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:04 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:05 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:37 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:38 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:39 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:26 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:42 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:47 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:53 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:04 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 19:20 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:24 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:36 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:37 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 07:53 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:56 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 11:04 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:53 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:16 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 23:22 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:24 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 23:37 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:26 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 02:51 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 22:54 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:59 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:01 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 21:19 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:56 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 20:31 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 22:29 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 02:50 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:57 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 20:31 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:22 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 07:58 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:26 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:44 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:43 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:15 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:19 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:51 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:42 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 08:38 -0400
Page 6 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 20 Next page →
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 12:27 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npsm39$prp$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367147 |
Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-08-26, GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > > // snip > >> The point is that chrisv doesn't use linux at all to post here. >> So, in your view, what does that make him? >> I've yet to see him/her advocate linux at all. > > Me personally, I don't care at all. And I'll back that up a little with > something you can look into for yourself. One of the smartest guys I > know in the Ubuntu group is Jonathan, and he has never posted from Linux > that I can see. Yet he has posted very helpful, and detailed posts on > all manner of Linux issues including a fair amount a very good shell > script. That is helpful advocacy in this case. And people appreciate the help. It's a positive experience. > > If you read him even for a little while, it will be clear to you he's a > Linux user. I think he volunteers for for a library where he manages a > bunch of a Linux boxes. Anyway, the point is, his contributions are all > great. I'd say he's in the top 2 or 3 of people I have grown to respect > over the last three years. And every post has been from NT thunderbird. > > So, do I really care what you used to post? No. Not at all. I care more > about the content. So do I, and when you get him/her mad and starts calling people foul names, it ruins any credibility of advocacy. I've yet to see him/her help anybody with a linux problem in all the years I've been here. > > Now, that's not to say that if I see someone trolling that I don't look > at the headers. That would be a lie. I do look. Because I am painting a > picture of the person. If they go on and on about how awesome Windows is > and the post from Windows, that matches up. If they go on and on about > how Linux sucks, yet post from Linux, that's weird. Why use it if you > hate it... So on that count alone I agree it is odd. But do I discredit > someone entirely based on what the post from? No. It's merely one of the > data points I would use to try an paint of a picture of the person. > > The bottom line is that the content is king. And if you think I'm lying > you're welcome read though all my posts on the Ubuntu group where I have > already chimed in on this same issue at least a few times over the years > and I have said the same thing I am saying now. And Chrisv didn't have a > damn thing to do with those posts. They were about other people > entirely. In each case I have mentioned Jonathan. He's simply a very > good example of why you can't judge a poster by the header of the post. > His content speaks volumes. I don't care what he posts with. Not even a > little. > I take your word that you aren't lying. It is the hypocrite chrisv that is the liar. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 12:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <VdWdnfq4GdFMeVzKnZ2dnUU7-KfNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367246 |
On 2016-08-27, GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > Marek Novotny wrote: > >> On 2016-08-26, GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> >> // snip >> >>> The point is that chrisv doesn't use linux at all to post here. >>> So, in your view, what does that make him? >>> I've yet to see him/her advocate linux at all. >> >> Me personally, I don't care at all. And I'll back that up a little with >> something you can look into for yourself. One of the smartest guys I >> know in the Ubuntu group is Jonathan, and he has never posted from Linux >> that I can see. Yet he has posted very helpful, and detailed posts on >> all manner of Linux issues including a fair amount a very good shell >> script. > > That is helpful advocacy in this case. And people appreciate the help. It's > a positive experience. > >> >> If you read him even for a little while, it will be clear to you he's a >> Linux user. I think he volunteers for for a library where he manages a >> bunch of a Linux boxes. Anyway, the point is, his contributions are all >> great. I'd say he's in the top 2 or 3 of people I have grown to respect >> over the last three years. And every post has been from NT thunderbird. >> >> So, do I really care what you used to post? No. Not at all. I care more >> about the content. > > So do I, and when you get him/her mad and starts calling people foul names, > it ruins any credibility of advocacy. > I've yet to see him/her help anybody with a linux problem in all the years > I've been here. > >> >> Now, that's not to say that if I see someone trolling that I don't look >> at the headers. That would be a lie. I do look. Because I am painting a >> picture of the person. If they go on and on about how awesome Windows is >> and the post from Windows, that matches up. If they go on and on about >> how Linux sucks, yet post from Linux, that's weird. Why use it if you >> hate it... So on that count alone I agree it is odd. But do I discredit >> someone entirely based on what the post from? No. It's merely one of the >> data points I would use to try an paint of a picture of the person. >> >> The bottom line is that the content is king. And if you think I'm lying >> you're welcome read though all my posts on the Ubuntu group where I have >> already chimed in on this same issue at least a few times over the years >> and I have said the same thing I am saying now. And Chrisv didn't have a >> damn thing to do with those posts. They were about other people >> entirely. In each case I have mentioned Jonathan. He's simply a very >> good example of why you can't judge a poster by the header of the post. >> His content speaks volumes. I don't care what he posts with. Not even a >> little. >> > > I take your word that you aren't lying. > It is the hypocrite chrisv that is the liar. In all fairness to you and chrisv there is history here that plays into these views. And I'm not part of that history. So my views will never be able to fully dovetail with the views here. In my main group I am a Red Hat fan boy. Almost everyone hates their guts and I'm the guy saying how awesome they are. There is bad blood from the old days which I simply wasn't around for. So I don't have that disdain to muddy up my views. Same goes for Canonical. Some people really hate Shuttleworth. I have no problem with him at all. I've been in Linux for 3 years. August is my yearly mark. I'm not, nor will I ever be the most popular view on Linux or the people here. I'm simply too new and don't have the baggage many of you have. Just keep that in mind. You'll have to cut me a little a slack as I need to see things with my own eyes and experience them for myself. I don't just take other people's word for things. That's going to piss off people and I'm sorry that can't be helped. I'm not going to read every post that has ever posted to form an opinion of the past. So I'm going to give you a fair shot and I hope you give me a fair shot and we'll see where that takes us. If our views are not compatible that's not a problem either. If you think I'm being an asshole, I'm sure you'll let me know. If I think it is justified I am sure I'll let you know. Some people I tried to give the benefit of the doubt to immediately started to say broad things like all Linux users are asshole liars and such. Blanket statements like that I will take as if they are said directly to me personally. I might say something like there are koolaid drinkers, but I don't believe I say all Mac users are koolaid drinkers. If I do I apologies. Not all are. Some of us are forced to use the shit platform. I am a Mac user, and don't wish to be. Anyway, this is getting weird. You get the idea. Hope we're cool. We don't need more enemies. We have plenty of those already. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 15:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <deddcad7-1250-4a56-be67-1bda64ace432@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367256 |
Marek Novotny wrote: > GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > > > > I take your word that you aren't lying. > > It is the hypocrite chrisv that is the liar. > > In all fairness to you and chrisv there is history here that plays into > these views. And I'm not part of that history. So my views will never > be able to fully dovetail with the views here. Which merely serves as a note for one to be more cognizant of the point, for subsequently making up one's own decision. > In my main group I am a Red Hat fan boy. Almost everyone hates their > guts and I'm the guy saying how awesome they are.... FWIW, something that can also be problematic is when participants fail to disclose any potential conflicts of interest. For example, it would be quite reasonable to view a 'fanboy' as actually being a 'shill' if they had an undisclosed professional relationship with said company. Case in point, are you by any chance a Red Hat employee? Or in any similar fashion affiliated (to the 'reasonable person' standard) with them? >I've been in Linux for 3 years. August is my yearly mark. "in": to what degree and/or fashion, with what relevant affiliations? Emphasis on things financial. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 18:20 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nptaot$sdn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367280 |
-hh wrote: > Marek Novotny wrote: >> GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> > >> > I take your word that you aren't lying. >> > It is the hypocrite chrisv that is the liar. >> >> In all fairness to you and chrisv there is history here that plays into >> these views. And I'm not part of that history. So my views will never >> be able to fully dovetail with the views here. > > Which merely serves as a note for one to be more cognizant of the point, > for subsequently making up one's own decision. > > > In my main group I am a Red Hat fan boy. Almost everyone hates their >> guts and I'm the guy saying how awesome they are.... > > FWIW, something that can also be problematic is when participants > fail to disclose any potential conflicts of interest. For example, it > would be quite reasonable to view a 'fanboy' as actually being a 'shill' > if they had an undisclosed professional relationship with said company. > > Case in point, are you by any chance a Red Hat employee? I don't think he is. His first recommendation to me was Ubuntu Linux. I believe that is Debian based, not rpm based like RedHat. > Or in any > similar fashion affiliated (to the 'reasonable person' standard) with > them? > >>I've been in Linux for 3 years. August is my yearly mark. > > "in": to what degree and/or fashion, with what relevant affiliations? > Emphasis on things financial. > > > -hh -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 18:24 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nptb0f$sdn$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367256 |
Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-08-27, GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> Marek Novotny wrote: >> >>> On 2016-08-26, GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>> >>> // snip >>> >>>> The point is that chrisv doesn't use linux at all to post here. >>>> So, in your view, what does that make him? >>>> I've yet to see him/her advocate linux at all. >>> >>> Me personally, I don't care at all. And I'll back that up a little with >>> something you can look into for yourself. One of the smartest guys I >>> know in the Ubuntu group is Jonathan, and he has never posted from Linux >>> that I can see. Yet he has posted very helpful, and detailed posts on >>> all manner of Linux issues including a fair amount a very good shell >>> script. >> >> That is helpful advocacy in this case. And people appreciate the help. >> It's a positive experience. >> >>> >>> If you read him even for a little while, it will be clear to you he's a >>> Linux user. I think he volunteers for for a library where he manages a >>> bunch of a Linux boxes. Anyway, the point is, his contributions are all >>> great. I'd say he's in the top 2 or 3 of people I have grown to respect >>> over the last three years. And every post has been from NT thunderbird. >>> >>> So, do I really care what you used to post? No. Not at all. I care more >>> about the content. >> >> So do I, and when you get him/her mad and starts calling people foul >> names, it ruins any credibility of advocacy. >> I've yet to see him/her help anybody with a linux problem in all the >> years I've been here. >> >>> >>> Now, that's not to say that if I see someone trolling that I don't look >>> at the headers. That would be a lie. I do look. Because I am painting a >>> picture of the person. If they go on and on about how awesome Windows is >>> and the post from Windows, that matches up. If they go on and on about >>> how Linux sucks, yet post from Linux, that's weird. Why use it if you >>> hate it... So on that count alone I agree it is odd. But do I discredit >>> someone entirely based on what the post from? No. It's merely one of the >>> data points I would use to try an paint of a picture of the person. >>> >>> The bottom line is that the content is king. And if you think I'm lying >>> you're welcome read though all my posts on the Ubuntu group where I have >>> already chimed in on this same issue at least a few times over the years >>> and I have said the same thing I am saying now. And Chrisv didn't have a >>> damn thing to do with those posts. They were about other people >>> entirely. In each case I have mentioned Jonathan. He's simply a very >>> good example of why you can't judge a poster by the header of the post. >>> His content speaks volumes. I don't care what he posts with. Not even a >>> little. >>> >> >> I take your word that you aren't lying. >> It is the hypocrite chrisv that is the liar. > > In all fairness to you and chrisv there is history here that plays into > these views. And I'm not part of that history. So my views will never be > able to fully dovetail with the views here. > > In my main group I am a Red Hat fan boy. Almost everyone hates their > guts and I'm the guy saying how awesome they are. There is bad blood > from the old days which I simply wasn't around for. So I don't have that > disdain to muddy up my views. Same goes for Canonical. Some people > really hate Shuttleworth. I have no problem with him at all. I've been > in Linux for 3 years. August is my yearly mark. > > I'm not, nor will I ever be the most popular view on Linux or the > people here. I'm simply too new and don't have the baggage many of you > have. Just keep that in mind. You'll have to cut me a little a slack as > I need to see things with my own eyes and experience them for myself. I > don't just take other people's word for things. That's going to piss off > people and I'm sorry that can't be helped. I'm not going to read every > post that has ever posted to form an opinion of the past. > > So I'm going to give you a fair shot and I hope you give me a fair shot > and we'll see where that takes us. If our views are not compatible > that's not a problem either. If you think I'm being an asshole, I'm sure > you'll let me know. If I think it is justified I am sure I'll let you > know. > > Some people I tried to give the benefit of the doubt to immediately > started to say broad things like all Linux users are asshole liars and > such. Blanket statements like that I will take as if they are said > directly to me personally. I might say something like there are koolaid > drinkers, but I don't believe I say all Mac users are koolaid drinkers. > If I do I apologies. Not all are. Some of us are forced to use the shit > platform. I am a Mac user, and don't wish to be. > > Anyway, this is getting weird. You get the idea. Hope we're cool. We > don't need more enemies. We have plenty of those already. > He/she was friendly for a few years, till I dropped out of here to do caregiving for my sister and Mother. No time. So about 5 years ago or so, I purchased a new HP. Of course it had win7 on it at the time, but also, I didn't follow any of the anti-trust stuff over MS. So when I did come back in, I asked what ever happened to this anti-trust stuff against MS. To make a long story short, he/she got pissed because I didn't say any bad words about MS in all of this, plus I purchased at a discount straight from MS VS2010 Pro. They knew me from a long time ago when I helped out getting their early 90s version of Fortran features that were needed. Hence the stiff discount. But that further enraged he/she so I was then called a POS. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 19:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <DKCdnYPirvh22F_KnZ2dnUU7-KvNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367284 |
On 2016-08-28, GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > Marek Novotny wrote: > >> On 2016-08-27, GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>> Marek Novotny wrote: >>> >>>> On 2016-08-26, GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> // snip >>>> >>>>> The point is that chrisv doesn't use linux at all to post here. >>>>> So, in your view, what does that make him? >>>>> I've yet to see him/her advocate linux at all. >>>> >>>> Me personally, I don't care at all. And I'll back that up a little with >>>> something you can look into for yourself. One of the smartest guys I >>>> know in the Ubuntu group is Jonathan, and he has never posted from Linux >>>> that I can see. Yet he has posted very helpful, and detailed posts on >>>> all manner of Linux issues including a fair amount a very good shell >>>> script. >>> >>> That is helpful advocacy in this case. And people appreciate the help. >>> It's a positive experience. >>> >>>> >>>> If you read him even for a little while, it will be clear to you he's a >>>> Linux user. I think he volunteers for for a library where he manages a >>>> bunch of a Linux boxes. Anyway, the point is, his contributions are all >>>> great. I'd say he's in the top 2 or 3 of people I have grown to respect >>>> over the last three years. And every post has been from NT thunderbird. >>>> >>>> So, do I really care what you used to post? No. Not at all. I care more >>>> about the content. >>> >>> So do I, and when you get him/her mad and starts calling people foul >>> names, it ruins any credibility of advocacy. >>> I've yet to see him/her help anybody with a linux problem in all the >>> years I've been here. >>> >>>> >>>> Now, that's not to say that if I see someone trolling that I don't look >>>> at the headers. That would be a lie. I do look. Because I am painting a >>>> picture of the person. If they go on and on about how awesome Windows is >>>> and the post from Windows, that matches up. If they go on and on about >>>> how Linux sucks, yet post from Linux, that's weird. Why use it if you >>>> hate it... So on that count alone I agree it is odd. But do I discredit >>>> someone entirely based on what the post from? No. It's merely one of the >>>> data points I would use to try an paint of a picture of the person. >>>> >>>> The bottom line is that the content is king. And if you think I'm lying >>>> you're welcome read though all my posts on the Ubuntu group where I have >>>> already chimed in on this same issue at least a few times over the years >>>> and I have said the same thing I am saying now. And Chrisv didn't have a >>>> damn thing to do with those posts. They were about other people >>>> entirely. In each case I have mentioned Jonathan. He's simply a very >>>> good example of why you can't judge a poster by the header of the post. >>>> His content speaks volumes. I don't care what he posts with. Not even a >>>> little. >>>> >>> >>> I take your word that you aren't lying. >>> It is the hypocrite chrisv that is the liar. >> >> In all fairness to you and chrisv there is history here that plays into >> these views. And I'm not part of that history. So my views will never be >> able to fully dovetail with the views here. >> >> In my main group I am a Red Hat fan boy. Almost everyone hates their >> guts and I'm the guy saying how awesome they are. There is bad blood >> from the old days which I simply wasn't around for. So I don't have that >> disdain to muddy up my views. Same goes for Canonical. Some people >> really hate Shuttleworth. I have no problem with him at all. I've been >> in Linux for 3 years. August is my yearly mark. >> >> I'm not, nor will I ever be the most popular view on Linux or the >> people here. I'm simply too new and don't have the baggage many of you >> have. Just keep that in mind. You'll have to cut me a little a slack as >> I need to see things with my own eyes and experience them for myself. I >> don't just take other people's word for things. That's going to piss off >> people and I'm sorry that can't be helped. I'm not going to read every >> post that has ever posted to form an opinion of the past. >> >> So I'm going to give you a fair shot and I hope you give me a fair shot >> and we'll see where that takes us. If our views are not compatible >> that's not a problem either. If you think I'm being an asshole, I'm sure >> you'll let me know. If I think it is justified I am sure I'll let you >> know. >> >> Some people I tried to give the benefit of the doubt to immediately >> started to say broad things like all Linux users are asshole liars and >> such. Blanket statements like that I will take as if they are said >> directly to me personally. I might say something like there are koolaid >> drinkers, but I don't believe I say all Mac users are koolaid drinkers. >> If I do I apologies. Not all are. Some of us are forced to use the shit >> platform. I am a Mac user, and don't wish to be. >> >> Anyway, this is getting weird. You get the idea. Hope we're cool. We >> don't need more enemies. We have plenty of those already. >> > > He/she was friendly for a few years, till I dropped out of here to do > caregiving for my sister and Mother. No time. So about 5 years ago or so, > I purchased a new HP. Of course it had win7 on it at the time, but also, I > didn't follow any of the anti-trust stuff over MS. So when I did come back > in, I asked what ever happened to this anti-trust stuff against MS. To make > a long story short, he/she got pissed because I didn't say any bad words > about MS in all of this, plus I purchased at a discount straight from MS > VS2010 Pro. They knew me from a long time ago when I helped out getting > their early 90s version of Fortran features that were needed. Hence the > stiff discount. But that further enraged he/she so I was then called a POS. I don't actually care what people use at all. It used to be that was the fun part. Learning what others were doing and with what hardware and I hoped it was different. Otherwise, there was nothing to talk about. When I had a commodore 64 I loved talking to PC DOS users. Every time I met someone who had a PC and wanted to check it out. The screen was sooo nice compared to my C= 64. I had PC envy big time. When I got an Amiga, I used to stop by this shop near my apartment and check out the Atari 520 ST. The mono display was so crisp and clean. Again, evny. I got some promotional tape on Sun's Open Look a long time ago and started dreaming about how cool that might be. Now we're older and we have money. We can buy whatever we like. And so I have tried everything. At this point I know what I like and what I don't like. But I'd still like to see something completely different. When I heard HP was making some fundamentally new architecture I wanted it without even knowing what it was. And now I understand they won't be bringing it out. Whatever it was. I love to explore. I'd love to see something totally new and different. I'd buy one, learn it and that right there would be fun. Would I like it more than Linux? Don't know. But finding out would be so fun. I'm kinda bummed out that all we get are revisions and updates. Faster, smaller, less power. Yawn... It ain't like when I was a kid. There was something completely different every where you turned. Not now. :( -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 19:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hIudnW52r6oF0l_KnZ2dnUU7-TednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367289 |
On 2016-08-28, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/27/16, 7:01 PM, in article > DKCdnYPirvh22F_KnZ2dnUU7-KvNnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" ><marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > > ... >>> He/she was friendly for a few years, till I dropped out of here to do >>> caregiving for my sister and Mother. No time. So about 5 years ago or so, >>> I purchased a new HP. Of course it had win7 on it at the time, but also, I >>> didn't follow any of the anti-trust stuff over MS. So when I did come back >>> in, I asked what ever happened to this anti-trust stuff against MS. To make >>> a long story short, he/she got pissed because I didn't say any bad words >>> about MS in all of this, plus I purchased at a discount straight from MS >>> VS2010 Pro. They knew me from a long time ago when I helped out getting >>> their early 90s version of Fortran features that were needed. Hence the >>> stiff discount. But that further enraged he/she so I was then called a POS. >> >> I don't actually care what people use at all. > > No offense but that is bullshit beyond belief. You have been working to save > your delicate ego by going on and on and on and on and on about how while I > was able to do a task far better than you that I was somehow wrong in my > doing so based on the tools I used. > > You have been telling me in mad rants how I should be using more "technical" > tools EVEN IF those tools would take longer and, based on your own example, > would produce not just slightly lower quality output but output that is so > bad as to be laughable (and for which can be done in other tools MUCH > faster). > >> It used to be that was the fun part. Learning what others were doing and with >> what hardware and I hoped it was different. Otherwise, there was nothing to >> talk about. > > You are still obsessed with it... so much so that you show no understanding > of the task that needs to be done because you cannot see past the tools > being used. Dude, you are so clueless.... Get over it.... Watching you self nuke today is fucking hilarious. And you're still doing it. Don't let me stop you. Copy and paste and another ten or twenty re-posts if you like. I got a bitcoin riding you dude. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-28 07:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ONadnQ9NBOcGal_KnZ2dnUU7-TednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367294 |
On 2016-08-28, William Poaster <wp@dev.null> wrote: > Marek Novotny wrote: > >> On 2016-08-28, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/27/16, 7:01 PM, in article >>> DKCdnYPirvh22F_KnZ2dnUU7-KvNnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" >>><marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>>> He/she was friendly for a few years, till I dropped out of here to do >>>>> caregiving for my sister and Mother. No time. So about 5 years ago or so, >>>>> I purchased a new HP. Of course it had win7 on it at the time, but also, I >>>>> didn't follow any of the anti-trust stuff over MS. So when I did come back >>>>> in, I asked what ever happened to this anti-trust stuff against MS. To make >>>>> a long story short, he/she got pissed because I didn't say any bad words >>>>> about MS in all of this, plus I purchased at a discount straight from MS >>>>> VS2010 Pro. They knew me from a long time ago when I helped out getting >>>>> their early 90s version of Fortran features that were needed. Hence the >>>>> stiff discount. But that further enraged he/she so I was then called a POS. >>>> >>>> I don't actually care what people use at all. >>> >>> No offense but that is bullshit beyond belief. You have been working to save >>> your delicate ego by going on and on and on and on and on about how while I >>> was able to do a task far better than you that I was somehow wrong in my >>> doing so based on the tools I used. >>> >>> You have been telling me in mad rants how I should be using more "technical" >>> tools EVEN IF those tools would take longer and, based on your own example, >>> would produce not just slightly lower quality output but output that is so >>> bad as to be laughable (and for which can be done in other tools MUCH >>> faster). >>> >>>> It used to be that was the fun part. Learning what others were doing and with >>>> what hardware and I hoped it was different. Otherwise, there was nothing to >>>> talk about. >>> >>> You are still obsessed with it... so much so that you show no understanding >>> of the task that needs to be done because you cannot see past the tools >>> being used. >> >> Dude, you are so clueless.... Get over it.... Watching you self nuke >> today is fucking hilarious. And you're still doing it. Don't let me stop >> you. Copy and paste and another ten or twenty re-posts if you like. I >> got a bitcoin riding you dude. > > "You have been working to save your delicate ego..." Priceless coming > from Michael Snit Glasser!! Absolutely fucking priceless! ROTFL > > "You have been telling me in mad rants.." LMAO > > Absolutely hilarious! It is. I thought guys were just saying he's on glue to piss him off. Now I think he must be on glue or something... Don't know what it is but if he stands on street corners and sells it, he'll make a few bucks. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-28 16:22 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <b7cb9d-lf7.ln1@debian.machineone.org> |
| In reply to | #367314 |
Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-08-28, William Poaster <wp@dev.null> wrote: >> Marek Novotny wrote: <snipped for brevity> >>>> You are still obsessed with it... so much so that you show no understanding >>>> of the task that needs to be done because you cannot see past the tools >>>> being used. >>> >>> Dude, you are so clueless.... Get over it.... Watching you self nuke >>> today is fucking hilarious. And you're still doing it. Don't let me stop >>> you. Copy and paste and another ten or twenty re-posts if you like. I >>> got a bitcoin riding you dude. >> >> "You have been working to save your delicate ego..." Priceless coming >> from Michael Snit Glasser!! Absolutely fucking priceless! ROTFL >> >> "You have been telling me in mad rants.." LMAO >> >> Absolutely hilarious! > > It is. I thought guys were just saying he's on glue to piss him off. > Now I think he must be on glue or something... No, in the replies I've seen back to Snit/Glasser, IMO it's been evident for quite some time that he's been on something, or completely off his head. Or maybe, completely off his head *on* something! > Don't know what it is but if he stands on street corners and sells it, > he'll make a few bucks. I dunno, but I reckon that if we could sell tickets for watching Glasser making a spectacle of himself, we'd make a fortune! And that's not to mention selling beer & popcorn! LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-28 09:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <H8SdneyoYov-i17KnZ2dnUU7-a-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367317 |
On 2016-08-28, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: HAHAHAHA cut and paste. Someone owes me a bitcoin!! -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-28 15:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npve34$et$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367317 |
On 8/28/2016 11:22 AM, William Poaster wrote: > Marek Novotny wrote: > >> On 2016-08-28, William Poaster <wp@dev.null> wrote: >>> Marek Novotny wrote: > > <snipped for brevity> > >>>>> You are still obsessed with it... so much so that you show no understanding >>>>> of the task that needs to be done because you cannot see past the tools >>>>> being used. >>>> >>>> Dude, you are so clueless.... Get over it.... Watching you self nuke >>>> today is fucking hilarious. And you're still doing it. Don't let me stop >>>> you. Copy and paste and another ten or twenty re-posts if you like. I >>>> got a bitcoin riding you dude. >>> >>> "You have been working to save your delicate ego..." Priceless coming >>> from Michael Snit Glasser!! Absolutely fucking priceless! ROTFL >>> >>> "You have been telling me in mad rants.." LMAO >>> >>> Absolutely hilarious! >> >> It is. I thought guys were just saying he's on glue to piss him off. >> Now I think he must be on glue or something... > > No, in the replies I've seen back to Snit/Glasser, IMO it's been > evident for quite some time that he's been on something, or completely > off his head. Or maybe, completely off his head *on* something! He's on various medications and when he mixes the drugs with alcohol and the glue he huffs, strange things happen. >> Don't know what it is but if he stands on street corners and sells it, >> he'll make a few bucks. > > I dunno, but I reckon that if we could sell tickets for watching Glasser > making a spectacle of himself, we'd make a fortune! > And that's not to mention selling beer & popcorn! LOL You should have been in CSMA a few years ago when he had a massive mental break down. The sock puppets were crawling out of every nook and cranny. One way to drive snit crazy is to talk about him but disengage from communicating with him. It drives him crazy. Well, crazier than he already is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-28 20:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <npvgrp$92j$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367345 |
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 15:29:38 -0400, Andy Rains wrote: > You should have been in CSMA a few years ago when he had a massive > mental break down. The sock puppets were crawling out of every nook and > cranny. > > One way to drive snit crazy is to talk about him but disengage from > communicating with him. It drives him crazy. Well, crazier than he > already is. How would you gauge that level of craziness? I think it would peg just about any conceivable meter (from the old analog days). And I think you're right about not talking to him. He does seem to particularly hate that. -- Zero tolerance for iCultists and WinDrones
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-28 17:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npvloc$pm5$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367350 |
On 8/28/2016 4:16 PM, ronb wrote: > On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 15:29:38 -0400, Andy Rains wrote: > >> You should have been in CSMA a few years ago when he had a massive >> mental break down. The sock puppets were crawling out of every nook and >> cranny. >> >> One way to drive snit crazy is to talk about him but disengage from >> communicating with him. It drives him crazy. Well, crazier than he >> already is. > > How would you gauge that level of craziness? I think it would peg just > about any conceivable meter (from the old analog days). And I think > you're right about not talking to him. He does seem to particularly hate > that. It's off the scale. Ever see those sci-fi movies from the 50's where there is some earthquake at the bottom of the ocean that is going to wipe out the planet? The meters in the scientists labs are pegging against the stops. That's snit. He is off the charts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-28 15:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2535e9dc-3268-4eb4-9aee-262ea6f210fb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367350 |
On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 8:23:11 PM UTC, Snit wrote: > On 8/28/16, 1:16 PM, in article npvgrp$92j$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" > <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 15:29:38 -0400, Andy Rains wrote: > > > >> You should have been in CSMA a few years ago when he had a massive > >> mental break down. The sock puppets were crawling out of every nook and > >> cranny. > >> > >> One way to drive snit crazy is to talk about him but disengage from > >> communicating with him. It drives him crazy. Well, crazier than he > >> already is. > > > > How would you gauge that level of craziness? I think it would peg just > > about any conceivable meter (from the old analog days). And I think > > you're right about not talking to him. He does seem to particularly hate > > that. > > Here is why the herd is in frenzy mode right now: Marek MASSIVELY self-nuked > and proved he had to run away from Linux to do even an EASY task poorly! > > 1) Marek hand-picked a task that had been discussed: > <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/bar512/> > Note the requirements are CLEARLY listed. This is your task gluey. You can push it onto Marek all you want but it still is your stupid task. You made something you thought was amazing when it really was stupid. Marek talked about it in that context. You did nothing other than take a screenshot of Numbers and then asked to be paid for it, assuming you even had a customer. Frankly that seems like bullshit to me. > 2) Marek went on and on and on about how easy it is. Cool! It was > not meant to be hard or require great technical skill. Bullshit. It was meant to show off your 'lete skills. You do the same with Dreamweaver which makes sites with templates and simple point and click alternation and produces fucked up code. > 3) Marek tried it but had to leave Linux behind and he STILL choked: > <https://www.dropbox.com/s/nv2vkhw03kp59gx/Comp1.mp4> His is technically a whole hell of a lot better than anything you can do. He was rubbing your nose in your crap. You being too stupid to figure that out is not his fault. > 4) Just to show him how trivial his "attempt" was I did similar things: > <https://youtu.be/OSygJ0NaO_4> You copied Marek after he shows you how to do it. How amazing of you. Why not use Numbers and ScreenFlow for your work now as you were before he educated you? > & <https://youtu.be/IlcmjR9JcmA> What "task" does this complete, gluey? > And since Marek went on and on about how I did not design Apple's Numbers > (WTF!) He did no such thing, liar. > and was not designing my own 3D items, I showed him these: an older > one of mine: <https://youtu.be/xltfGTNHtLI> I doubt you made that. Even if you did you use an image of a pie which is not yours. You give no credit. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/3/13/1193773/-State-Tax-Cuts-Take-a-Bite-Out-of-Pennsylvania-s-Budget-Pie Is there any time when you are honest, Snit? > and one I made just for him: > <https://youtu.be/1J1k7gQQ3oo>. The background looks like something you saw when you were sniffing glue. > Nothing fancy or great but FAR better than > what he showed... but it is not even a competition to see who has the best > skills! That is just Marek pushing his ego onto COLA! Says you as you try to show off your 'lete skills. Cut the bullshit, Snit. Your Psychology degree is not worth the money you spent on it. > Marek choked HARD and even to do that he had to leave Linux behind... on a > task HE focused on and HE deemed easy! He did not leave Linux behind but use what he thought was the best tool for him, something you claim to support. Now you attack him for it liar. > Man, what a horrid self-nuke from Marek. Just amazing. And absolutely > predictable that the herd will dive in to try to rescue him. People will call you on your crap and you are preparing by saying you will copy and paste the same shit so you do not have to deal with it. > As I have said, COLA is an interesting place to watch the psychology of > people! The psychology of you after you sniff glue.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-28 18:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npvo16$4f8$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367366 |
On 8/28/2016 6:14 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 8:23:11 PM UTC, Snit wrote: >> On 8/28/16, 1:16 PM, in article npvgrp$92j$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" >> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 15:29:38 -0400, Andy Rains wrote: >>> >>>> You should have been in CSMA a few years ago when he had a massive >>>> mental break down. The sock puppets were crawling out of every nook and >>>> cranny. >>>> >>>> One way to drive snit crazy is to talk about him but disengage from >>>> communicating with him. It drives him crazy. Well, crazier than he >>>> already is. >>> >>> How would you gauge that level of craziness? I think it would peg just >>> about any conceivable meter (from the old analog days). And I think >>> you're right about not talking to him. He does seem to particularly hate >>> that. >> >> Here is why the herd is in frenzy mode right now: Marek MASSIVELY self-nuked >> and proved he had to run away from Linux to do even an EASY task poorly! >> >> 1) Marek hand-picked a task that had been discussed: >> <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/bar512/> >> Note the requirements are CLEARLY listed. > > This is your task gluey. You can push it onto Marek all you want but it still is your stupid task. You made something you thought was amazing when it really was stupid. Marek talked about it in that context. You did nothing other than take a screenshot of Numbers and then asked to be paid for it, assuming you even had a customer. Frankly that seems like bullshit to me. > >> 2) Marek went on and on and on about how easy it is. Cool! It was >> not meant to be hard or require great technical skill. > > Bullshit. It was meant to show off your 'lete skills. You do the same with Dreamweaver which makes sites with templates and simple point and click alternation and produces fucked up code. > >> 3) Marek tried it but had to leave Linux behind and he STILL choked: >> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/nv2vkhw03kp59gx/Comp1.mp4> > > His is technically a whole hell of a lot better than anything you can do. He was rubbing your nose in your crap. You being too stupid to figure that out is not his fault. > >> 4) Just to show him how trivial his "attempt" was I did similar things: >> <https://youtu.be/OSygJ0NaO_4> > > You copied Marek after he shows you how to do it. How amazing of you. Why not use Numbers and ScreenFlow for your work now as you were before he educated you? > >> & <https://youtu.be/IlcmjR9JcmA> > > What "task" does this complete, gluey? > >> And since Marek went on and on about how I did not design Apple's Numbers >> (WTF!) > > He did no such thing, liar. > >> and was not designing my own 3D items, I showed him these: an older >> one of mine: <https://youtu.be/xltfGTNHtLI> > > I doubt you made that. Even if you did you use an image of a pie which is not yours. You give no credit. > > http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/3/13/1193773/-State-Tax-Cuts-Take-a-Bite-Out-of-Pennsylvania-s-Budget-Pie > > Is there any time when you are honest, Snit? > >> and one I made just for him: >> <https://youtu.be/1J1k7gQQ3oo>. > > The background looks like something you saw when you were sniffing glue. > >> Nothing fancy or great but FAR better than >> what he showed... but it is not even a competition to see who has the best >> skills! That is just Marek pushing his ego onto COLA! > > Says you as you try to show off your 'lete skills. Cut the bullshit, Snit. Your Psychology degree is not worth the money you spent on it. > >> Marek choked HARD and even to do that he had to leave Linux behind... on a >> task HE focused on and HE deemed easy! > > He did not leave Linux behind but use what he thought was the best tool for him, something you claim to support. Now you attack him for it liar. > >> Man, what a horrid self-nuke from Marek. Just amazing. And absolutely >> predictable that the herd will dive in to try to rescue him. > > People will call you on your crap and you are preparing by saying you will copy and paste the same shit so you do not have to deal with it. > >> As I have said, COLA is an interesting place to watch the psychology of >> people! > > The psychology of you after you sniff glue. Interesting how snit is accusing "the herd", whatever that is, of being in a frenzy when he is the one posting the same message over and over again. Seems to me it's snit that is in a frenzy. The rest of us are having a good laugh at his expense.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-28 16:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c5e880fa-72ce-4c5c-a8c8-50e0c6300d03@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367372 |
On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 4:19:20 PM UTC-6, Andy Rains wrote: > On 8/28/2016 6:14 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 8:23:11 PM UTC, Snit wrote: > >> On 8/28/16, 1:16 PM, in article npvgrp$92j$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" > >> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 15:29:38 -0400, Andy Rains wrote: > >>> > >>>> You should have been in CSMA a few years ago when he had a massive > >>>> mental break down. The sock puppets were crawling out of every nook and > >>>> cranny. > >>>> > >>>> One way to drive snit crazy is to talk about him but disengage from > >>>> communicating with him. It drives him crazy. Well, crazier than he > >>>> already is. > >>> > >>> How would you gauge that level of craziness? I think it would peg just > >>> about any conceivable meter (from the old analog days). And I think > >>> you're right about not talking to him. He does seem to particularly hate > >>> that. > >> > >> Here is why the herd is in frenzy mode right now: Marek MASSIVELY self-nuked > >> and proved he had to run away from Linux to do even an EASY task poorly! > >> > >> 1) Marek hand-picked a task that had been discussed: > >> <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/bar512/> > >> Note the requirements are CLEARLY listed. > > > > This is your task gluey. You can push it onto Marek all you want but it still is your stupid task. You made something you thought was amazing when it really was stupid. Marek talked about it in that context. You did nothing other than take a screenshot of Numbers and then asked to be paid for it, assuming you even had a customer. Frankly that seems like bullshit to me. > > > >> 2) Marek went on and on and on about how easy it is. Cool! It was > >> not meant to be hard or require great technical skill. > > > > Bullshit. It was meant to show off your 'lete skills. You do the same with Dreamweaver which makes sites with templates and simple point and click alternation and produces fucked up code. > > > >> 3) Marek tried it but had to leave Linux behind and he STILL choked: > >> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/nv2vkhw03kp59gx/Comp1.mp4> > > > > His is technically a whole hell of a lot better than anything you can do. He was rubbing your nose in your crap. You being too stupid to figure that out is not his fault. > > > >> 4) Just to show him how trivial his "attempt" was I did similar things: > >> <https://youtu.be/OSygJ0NaO_4> > > > > You copied Marek after he shows you how to do it. How amazing of you. Why not use Numbers and ScreenFlow for your work now as you were before he educated you? > > > >> & <https://youtu.be/IlcmjR9JcmA> > > > > What "task" does this complete, gluey? > > > >> And since Marek went on and on about how I did not design Apple's Numbers > >> (WTF!) > > > > He did no such thing, liar. > > > >> and was not designing my own 3D items, I showed him these: an older > >> one of mine: <https://youtu.be/xltfGTNHtLI> > > > > I doubt you made that. Even if you did you use an image of a pie which is not yours. You give no credit. > > > > http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/3/13/1193773/-State-Tax-Cuts-Take-a-Bite-Out-of-Pennsylvania-s-Budget-Pie > > > > Is there any time when you are honest, Snit? > > > >> and one I made just for him: > >> <https://youtu.be/1J1k7gQQ3oo>. > > > > The background looks like something you saw when you were sniffing glue. > > > >> Nothing fancy or great but FAR better than > >> what he showed... but it is not even a competition to see who has the best > >> skills! That is just Marek pushing his ego onto COLA! > > > > Says you as you try to show off your 'lete skills. Cut the bullshit, Snit. Your Psychology degree is not worth the money you spent on it. > > > >> Marek choked HARD and even to do that he had to leave Linux behind... on a > >> task HE focused on and HE deemed easy! > > > > He did not leave Linux behind but use what he thought was the best tool for him, something you claim to support. Now you attack him for it liar. > > > >> Man, what a horrid self-nuke from Marek. Just amazing. And absolutely > >> predictable that the herd will dive in to try to rescue him. > > > > People will call you on your crap and you are preparing by saying you will copy and paste the same shit so you do not have to deal with it. > > > >> As I have said, COLA is an interesting place to watch the psychology of > >> people! > > > > The psychology of you after you sniff glue. > > Interesting how snit is accusing "the herd", whatever that is, of being > in a frenzy when he is the one posting the same message over and over again. FYI, here, you are responding to Snit... who forged my name again. > Seems to me it's snit that is in a frenzy. He gets like that now and then. > The rest of us are having a good laugh at his expense. Marek did a great job ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-28 19:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npvsom$i0u$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367379 |
On 8/28/2016 7:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 4:19:20 PM UTC-6, Andy Rains wrote: >> On 8/28/2016 6:14 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 8:23:11 PM UTC, Snit wrote: >>>> On 8/28/16, 1:16 PM, in article npvgrp$92j$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" >>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 15:29:38 -0400, Andy Rains wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> You should have been in CSMA a few years ago when he had a massive >>>>>> mental break down. The sock puppets were crawling out of every nook and >>>>>> cranny. >>>>>> >>>>>> One way to drive snit crazy is to talk about him but disengage from >>>>>> communicating with him. It drives him crazy. Well, crazier than he >>>>>> already is. >>>>> >>>>> How would you gauge that level of craziness? I think it would peg just >>>>> about any conceivable meter (from the old analog days). And I think >>>>> you're right about not talking to him. He does seem to particularly hate >>>>> that. >>>> >>>> Here is why the herd is in frenzy mode right now: Marek MASSIVELY self-nuked >>>> and proved he had to run away from Linux to do even an EASY task poorly! >>>> >>>> 1) Marek hand-picked a task that had been discussed: >>>> <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/bar512/> >>>> Note the requirements are CLEARLY listed. >>> >>> This is your task gluey. You can push it onto Marek all you want but it still is your stupid task. You made something you thought was amazing when it really was stupid. Marek talked about it in that context. You did nothing other than take a screenshot of Numbers and then asked to be paid for it, assuming you even had a customer. Frankly that seems like bullshit to me. >>> >>>> 2) Marek went on and on and on about how easy it is. Cool! It was >>>> not meant to be hard or require great technical skill. >>> >>> Bullshit. It was meant to show off your 'lete skills. You do the same with Dreamweaver which makes sites with templates and simple point and click alternation and produces fucked up code. >>> >>>> 3) Marek tried it but had to leave Linux behind and he STILL choked: >>>> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/nv2vkhw03kp59gx/Comp1.mp4> >>> >>> His is technically a whole hell of a lot better than anything you can do. He was rubbing your nose in your crap. You being too stupid to figure that out is not his fault. >>> >>>> 4) Just to show him how trivial his "attempt" was I did similar things: >>>> <https://youtu.be/OSygJ0NaO_4> >>> >>> You copied Marek after he shows you how to do it. How amazing of you. Why not use Numbers and ScreenFlow for your work now as you were before he educated you? >>> >>>> & <https://youtu.be/IlcmjR9JcmA> >>> >>> What "task" does this complete, gluey? >>> >>>> And since Marek went on and on about how I did not design Apple's Numbers >>>> (WTF!) >>> >>> He did no such thing, liar. >>> >>>> and was not designing my own 3D items, I showed him these: an older >>>> one of mine: <https://youtu.be/xltfGTNHtLI> >>> >>> I doubt you made that. Even if you did you use an image of a pie which is not yours. You give no credit. >>> >>> http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/3/13/1193773/-State-Tax-Cuts-Take-a-Bite-Out-of-Pennsylvania-s-Budget-Pie >>> >>> Is there any time when you are honest, Snit? >>> >>>> and one I made just for him: >>>> <https://youtu.be/1J1k7gQQ3oo>. >>> >>> The background looks like something you saw when you were sniffing glue.. >>> >>>> Nothing fancy or great but FAR better than >>>> what he showed... but it is not even a competition to see who has the best >>>> skills! That is just Marek pushing his ego onto COLA! >>> >>> Says you as you try to show off your 'lete skills. Cut the bullshit, Snit. Your Psychology degree is not worth the money you spent on it. >>> >>>> Marek choked HARD and even to do that he had to leave Linux behind... on a >>>> task HE focused on and HE deemed easy! >>> >>> He did not leave Linux behind but use what he thought was the best tool for him, something you claim to support. Now you attack him for it liar. >>> >>>> Man, what a horrid self-nuke from Marek. Just amazing. And absolutely >>>> predictable that the herd will dive in to try to rescue him. >>> >>> People will call you on your crap and you are preparing by saying you will copy and paste the same shit so you do not have to deal with it. >>> >>>> As I have said, COLA is an interesting place to watch the psychology of >>>> people! >>> >>> The psychology of you after you sniff glue. >> >> Interesting how snit is accusing "the herd", whatever that is, of being >> in a frenzy when he is the one posting the same message over and over again. > > FYI, here, you are responding to Snit... who forged my name again. > >> Seems to me it's snit that is in a frenzy. > > He gets like that now and then. > >> The rest of us are having a good laugh at his expense. > > Marek did a great job ;) > How did snit forge your name?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-28 16:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6d2e9dff-e2b1-409f-90fc-ef0bc589c7fc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367386 |
On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 5:40:07 PM UTC-6, Andy Rains wrote: > On 8/28/2016 7:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 4:19:20 PM UTC-6, Andy Rains wrote: > >> On 8/28/2016 6:14 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 8:23:11 PM UTC, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 8/28/16, 1:16 PM, in article npvgrp$92j$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" > >>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 15:29:38 -0400, Andy Rains wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> You should have been in CSMA a few years ago when he had a massive > >>>>>> mental break down. The sock puppets were crawling out of every nook and > >>>>>> cranny. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> One way to drive snit crazy is to talk about him but disengage from > >>>>>> communicating with him. It drives him crazy. Well, crazier than he > >>>>>> already is. > >>>>> > >>>>> How would you gauge that level of craziness? I think it would peg just > >>>>> about any conceivable meter (from the old analog days). And I think > >>>>> you're right about not talking to him. He does seem to particularly hate > >>>>> that. > >>>> > >>>> Here is why the herd is in frenzy mode right now: Marek MASSIVELY self-nuked > >>>> and proved he had to run away from Linux to do even an EASY task poorly! > >>>> > >>>> 1) Marek hand-picked a task that had been discussed: > >>>> <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/bar512/> > >>>> Note the requirements are CLEARLY listed. > >>> > >>> This is your task gluey. You can push it onto Marek all you want but it still is your stupid task. You made something you thought was amazing when it really was stupid. Marek talked about it in that context. You did nothing other than take a screenshot of Numbers and then asked to be paid for it, assuming you even had a customer. Frankly that seems like bullshit to me. > >>> > >>>> 2) Marek went on and on and on about how easy it is. Cool! It was > >>>> not meant to be hard or require great technical skill. > >>> > >>> Bullshit. It was meant to show off your 'lete skills. You do the same with Dreamweaver which makes sites with templates and simple point and click alternation and produces fucked up code. > >>> > >>>> 3) Marek tried it but had to leave Linux behind and he STILL choked: > >>>> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/nv2vkhw03kp59gx/Comp1.mp4> > >>> > >>> His is technically a whole hell of a lot better than anything you can do. He was rubbing your nose in your crap. You being too stupid to figure that out is not his fault. > >>> > >>>> 4) Just to show him how trivial his "attempt" was I did similar things: > >>>> <https://youtu.be/OSygJ0NaO_4> > >>> > >>> You copied Marek after he shows you how to do it. How amazing of you. Why not use Numbers and ScreenFlow for your work now as you were before he educated you? > >>> > >>>> & <https://youtu.be/IlcmjR9JcmA> > >>> > >>> What "task" does this complete, gluey? > >>> > >>>> And since Marek went on and on about how I did not design Apple's Numbers > >>>> (WTF!) > >>> > >>> He did no such thing, liar. > >>> > >>>> and was not designing my own 3D items, I showed him these: an older > >>>> one of mine: <https://youtu.be/xltfGTNHtLI> > >>> > >>> I doubt you made that. Even if you did you use an image of a pie which is not yours. You give no credit. > >>> > >>> http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/3/13/1193773/-State-Tax-Cuts-Take-a-Bite-Out-of-Pennsylvania-s-Budget-Pie > >>> > >>> Is there any time when you are honest, Snit? > >>> > >>>> and one I made just for him: > >>>> <https://youtu.be/1J1k7gQQ3oo>. > >>> > >>> The background looks like something you saw when you were sniffing glue.. > >>> > >>>> Nothing fancy or great but FAR better than > >>>> what he showed... but it is not even a competition to see who has the best > >>>> skills! That is just Marek pushing his ego onto COLA! > >>> > >>> Says you as you try to show off your 'lete skills. Cut the bullshit, Snit. Your Psychology degree is not worth the money you spent on it. > >>> > >>>> Marek choked HARD and even to do that he had to leave Linux behind... on a > >>>> task HE focused on and HE deemed easy! > >>> > >>> He did not leave Linux behind but use what he thought was the best tool for him, something you claim to support. Now you attack him for it liar. > >>> > >>>> Man, what a horrid self-nuke from Marek. Just amazing. And absolutely > >>>> predictable that the herd will dive in to try to rescue him. > >>> > >>> People will call you on your crap and you are preparing by saying you will copy and paste the same shit so you do not have to deal with it. > >>> > >>>> As I have said, COLA is an interesting place to watch the psychology of > >>>> people! > >>> > >>> The psychology of you after you sniff glue. > >> > >> Interesting how snit is accusing "the herd", whatever that is, of being > >> in a frenzy when he is the one posting the same message over and over again. > > > > FYI, here, you are responding to Snit... who forged my name again. > > > >> Seems to me it's snit that is in a frenzy. > > > > He gets like that now and then. > > > >> The rest of us are having a good laugh at his expense. > > > > Marek did a great job ;) > > > How did snit forge your name? Badly ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-28 19:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npvt0g$i0u$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367389 |
On 8/28/2016 7:42 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 5:40:07 PM UTC-6, Andy Rains wrote: >> On 8/28/2016 7:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 4:19:20 PM UTC-6, Andy Rains wrote: >>>> On 8/28/2016 6:14 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 8:23:11 PM UTC, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 8/28/16, 1:16 PM, in article npvgrp$92j$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" >>>>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 15:29:38 -0400, Andy Rains wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You should have been in CSMA a few years ago when he had a massive >>>>>>>> mental break down. The sock puppets were crawling out of every nook and >>>>>>>> cranny. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> One way to drive snit crazy is to talk about him but disengage from >>>>>>>> communicating with him. It drives him crazy. Well, crazier than he >>>>>>>> already is. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How would you gauge that level of craziness? I think it would peg just >>>>>>> about any conceivable meter (from the old analog days). And I think >>>>>>> you're right about not talking to him. He does seem to particularly hate >>>>>>> that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is why the herd is in frenzy mode right now: Marek MASSIVELY self-nuked >>>>>> and proved he had to run away from Linux to do even an EASY task poorly! >>>>>> >>>>>> 1) Marek hand-picked a task that had been discussed: >>>>>> <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/bar512/> >>>>>> Note the requirements are CLEARLY listed. >>>>> >>>>> This is your task gluey. You can push it onto Marek all you want but it still is your stupid task. You made something you thought was amazing when it really was stupid. Marek talked about it in that context. You did nothing other than take a screenshot of Numbers and then asked to be paid for it, assuming you even had a customer. Frankly that seems like bullshit to me. >>>>> >>>>>> 2) Marek went on and on and on about how easy it is. Cool! It was >>>>>> not meant to be hard or require great technical skill. >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit. It was meant to show off your 'lete skills. You do the same with Dreamweaver which makes sites with templates and simple point and click alternation and produces fucked up code. >>>>> >>>>>> 3) Marek tried it but had to leave Linux behind and he STILL choked: >>>>>> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/nv2vkhw03kp59gx/Comp1.mp4> >>>>> >>>>> His is technically a whole hell of a lot better than anything you can do. He was rubbing your nose in your crap. You being too stupid to figure that out is not his fault. >>>>> >>>>>> 4) Just to show him how trivial his "attempt" was I did similar things: >>>>>> <https://youtu.be/OSygJ0NaO_4> >>>>> >>>>> You copied Marek after he shows you how to do it. How amazing of you. Why not use Numbers and ScreenFlow for your work now as you were before he educated you? >>>>> >>>>>> & <https://youtu.be/IlcmjR9JcmA> >>>>> >>>>> What "task" does this complete, gluey? >>>>> >>>>>> And since Marek went on and on about how I did not design Apple's Numbers >>>>>> (WTF!) >>>>> >>>>> He did no such thing, liar. >>>>> >>>>>> and was not designing my own 3D items, I showed him these: an older >>>>>> one of mine: <https://youtu.be/xltfGTNHtLI> >>>>> >>>>> I doubt you made that. Even if you did you use an image of a pie which is not yours. You give no credit. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/3/13/1193773/-State-Tax-Cuts-Take-a-Bite-Out-of-Pennsylvania-s-Budget-Pie >>>>> >>>>> Is there any time when you are honest, Snit? >>>>> >>>>>> and one I made just for him: >>>>>> <https://youtu.be/1J1k7gQQ3oo>. >>>>> >>>>> The background looks like something you saw when you were sniffing glue.. >>>>> >>>>>> Nothing fancy or great but FAR better than >>>>>> what he showed... but it is not even a competition to see who has the best >>>>>> skills! That is just Marek pushing his ego onto COLA! >>>>> >>>>> Says you as you try to show off your 'lete skills. Cut the bullshit, Snit. Your Psychology degree is not worth the money you spent on it. >>>>> >>>>>> Marek choked HARD and even to do that he had to leave Linux behind.... on a >>>>>> task HE focused on and HE deemed easy! >>>>> >>>>> He did not leave Linux behind but use what he thought was the best tool for him, something you claim to support. Now you attack him for it liar. >>>>> >>>>>> Man, what a horrid self-nuke from Marek. Just amazing. And absolutely >>>>>> predictable that the herd will dive in to try to rescue him. >>>>> >>>>> People will call you on your crap and you are preparing by saying you will copy and paste the same shit so you do not have to deal with it. >>>>> >>>>>> As I have said, COLA is an interesting place to watch the psychology of >>>>>> people! >>>>> >>>>> The psychology of you after you sniff glue. >>>> >>>> Interesting how snit is accusing "the herd", whatever that is, of being >>>> in a frenzy when he is the one posting the same message over and over again. >>> >>> FYI, here, you are responding to Snit... who forged my name again. >>> >>>> Seems to me it's snit that is in a frenzy. >>> >>> He gets like that now and then. >>> >>>> The rest of us are having a good laugh at his expense. >>> >>> Marek did a great job ;) >>> >> How did snit forge your name? > > Badly ;) > Specifically how. IOW, what differentiates a legitimate post from you vs a fake from snit, or someone else?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-28 16:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8fb227c5-25ef-4ed2-865a-85cccb9b091c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367391 |
On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 5:44:18 PM UTC-6, Andy Rains wrote: > On 8/28/2016 7:42 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 5:40:07 PM UTC-6, Andy Rains wrote: > >> On 8/28/2016 7:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 4:19:20 PM UTC-6, Andy Rains wrote: > >>>> On 8/28/2016 6:14 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>> On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 8:23:11 PM UTC, Snit wrote: > >>>>>> On 8/28/16, 1:16 PM, in article npvgrp$92j$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" > >>>>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 15:29:38 -0400, Andy Rains wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You should have been in CSMA a few years ago when he had a massive > >>>>>>>> mental break down. The sock puppets were crawling out of every nook and > >>>>>>>> cranny. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> One way to drive snit crazy is to talk about him but disengage from > >>>>>>>> communicating with him. It drives him crazy. Well, crazier than he > >>>>>>>> already is. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> How would you gauge that level of craziness? I think it would peg just > >>>>>>> about any conceivable meter (from the old analog days). And I think > >>>>>>> you're right about not talking to him. He does seem to particularly hate > >>>>>>> that. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Here is why the herd is in frenzy mode right now: Marek MASSIVELY self-nuked > >>>>>> and proved he had to run away from Linux to do even an EASY task poorly! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 1) Marek hand-picked a task that had been discussed: > >>>>>> <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/bar512/> > >>>>>> Note the requirements are CLEARLY listed. > >>>>> > >>>>> This is your task gluey. You can push it onto Marek all you want but it still is your stupid task. You made something you thought was amazing when it really was stupid. Marek talked about it in that context. You did nothing other than take a screenshot of Numbers and then asked to be paid for it, assuming you even had a customer. Frankly that seems like bullshit to me. > >>>>> > >>>>>> 2) Marek went on and on and on about how easy it is. Cool! It was > >>>>>> not meant to be hard or require great technical skill. > >>>>> > >>>>> Bullshit. It was meant to show off your 'lete skills. You do the same with Dreamweaver which makes sites with templates and simple point and click alternation and produces fucked up code. > >>>>> > >>>>>> 3) Marek tried it but had to leave Linux behind and he STILL choked: > >>>>>> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/nv2vkhw03kp59gx/Comp1.mp4> > >>>>> > >>>>> His is technically a whole hell of a lot better than anything you can do. He was rubbing your nose in your crap. You being too stupid to figure that out is not his fault. > >>>>> > >>>>>> 4) Just to show him how trivial his "attempt" was I did similar things: > >>>>>> <https://youtu.be/OSygJ0NaO_4> > >>>>> > >>>>> You copied Marek after he shows you how to do it. How amazing of you. Why not use Numbers and ScreenFlow for your work now as you were before he educated you? > >>>>> > >>>>>> & <https://youtu.be/IlcmjR9JcmA> > >>>>> > >>>>> What "task" does this complete, gluey? > >>>>> > >>>>>> And since Marek went on and on about how I did not design Apple's Numbers > >>>>>> (WTF!) > >>>>> > >>>>> He did no such thing, liar. > >>>>> > >>>>>> and was not designing my own 3D items, I showed him these: an older > >>>>>> one of mine: <https://youtu.be/xltfGTNHtLI> > >>>>> > >>>>> I doubt you made that. Even if you did you use an image of a pie which is not yours. You give no credit. > >>>>> > >>>>> http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/3/13/1193773/-State-Tax-Cuts-Take-a-Bite-Out-of-Pennsylvania-s-Budget-Pie > >>>>> > >>>>> Is there any time when you are honest, Snit? > >>>>> > >>>>>> and one I made just for him: > >>>>>> <https://youtu.be/1J1k7gQQ3oo>. > >>>>> > >>>>> The background looks like something you saw when you were sniffing glue.. > >>>>> > >>>>>> Nothing fancy or great but FAR better than > >>>>>> what he showed... but it is not even a competition to see who has the best > >>>>>> skills! That is just Marek pushing his ego onto COLA! > >>>>> > >>>>> Says you as you try to show off your 'lete skills. Cut the bullshit, Snit. Your Psychology degree is not worth the money you spent on it. > >>>>> > >>>>>> Marek choked HARD and even to do that he had to leave Linux behind.... on a > >>>>>> task HE focused on and HE deemed easy! > >>>>> > >>>>> He did not leave Linux behind but use what he thought was the best tool for him, something you claim to support. Now you attack him for it liar. > >>>>> > >>>>>> Man, what a horrid self-nuke from Marek. Just amazing. And absolutely > >>>>>> predictable that the herd will dive in to try to rescue him. > >>>>> > >>>>> People will call you on your crap and you are preparing by saying you will copy and paste the same shit so you do not have to deal with it. > >>>>> > >>>>>> As I have said, COLA is an interesting place to watch the psychology of > >>>>>> people! > >>>>> > >>>>> The psychology of you after you sniff glue. > >>>> > >>>> Interesting how snit is accusing "the herd", whatever that is, of being > >>>> in a frenzy when he is the one posting the same message over and over again. > >>> > >>> FYI, here, you are responding to Snit... who forged my name again. > >>> > >>>> Seems to me it's snit that is in a frenzy. > >>> > >>> He gets like that now and then. > >>> > >>>> The rest of us are having a good laugh at his expense. > >>> > >>> Marek did a great job ;) > >>> > >> How did snit forge your name? > > > > Badly ;) > > > Specifically how. > IOW, what differentiates a legitimate post from you vs a fake from snit, > or someone else? The headers are a good start... and the fact that Snit is a known user of TOR.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web