Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #370938 > unrolled thread

Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-09-14 23:07 +0000
    Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 00:44 +0000
      Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-09-15 14:53 +0000
        Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 16:19 +0000
          Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-09-15 17:03 +0000
          Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-09-15 12:19 -0600
            Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 18:48 +0000
              Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-09-15 21:17 -0600
      Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-15 15:29 +0000
        Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 16:21 +0000
          Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-15 16:36 +0000
            Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 17:41 +0000
              Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-15 18:08 +0000
                Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 18:47 +0000
                  Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-15 19:19 +0000
                    Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 19:26 +0000
                      Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-15 19:56 +0000
                        Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 20:16 +0000
                          Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-15 15:28 -0500
                          Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 14:10 -0700
                          Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-15 21:44 +0000
                            Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 03:39 +0000
                    Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-15 21:21 +0000
                      Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 00:27 +0200
                      Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-15 23:58 +0000
    Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-14 20:46 -0400
      Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-09-15 14:31 +0000
        Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-16 20:15 -0400
          Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-09-17 17:25 +0000
            Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-17 22:00 -0400
    Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-15 02:01 +0000
    re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks "Drummer"<drummer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 07:00 +0200
    Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-18 14:43 -0400
      Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-09-18 14:52 -0400
        Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-18 16:16 -0400
        Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-18 20:05 -0400
          Re: Video Demo of GNU/Linux Superiority -- Essential Tasks Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 17:12 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#371252

Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
> On 2016-09-15, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>>> On 2016-09-15, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> // snip
>>> 
>>>>> It does seem that the center is the center of the universe now. What's
>>>>> the first app most people reach for these days? I'll bet it is the
>>>>> browser. And you'll want that wheel, huh? I get it. Just miss the old
>>>>> days when it comes to mice. 
>>>>
>>>> Of course it goes without saying that web browsing benefits greatly from
>>>> the wheel, but the wheel is also good for scrolling in terminals that
>>>> support it.  But middle-click paste is a much smoother operation without
>>>> a wheel, so the idea of separating the wheel from the middle button
>>>> seems like the best of both worlds. 
>>>>
>>>> Also, blender makes heavy use of both the middle button and the scroll
>>>> wheel for separate navigation functions, and it was actually some blender
>>>> forum where I first saw mention of this mouse.
>>> 
>>> Ah well then you have a purpose in mind. How's Blender? Still
>>> interesting? 
>>> 
>>
>> It's a fun app.  I need to alter my approach to learning it though.
>> I've just been dabbling with it, thinking of "how do i do x?" then
>> looking around for how to do x.  That sometimes is successful, but
>> for the most part it leaves me with huge holes in my understanding
>> of what's going on.  I bought a book, but finding the discipline
>> to go through it and all the tutorials online is a different matter.
>> It also doesn't help that it includes two different render engines,
>> each with its own set of options.
>>
>> Also, i'm afraid it's going to take a render farm to do anything
>> really fun animation-wise.  This laptop takes 10-20 minutes to
>> render a single frame with anything approaching decent detail,
>> so I haven't even bothered try video rendering yet.  The animated
>> stuff I've posted so far was sort of a preview, and not actually
>> rendered.
> 
> I used to use Maxxon Cinema 4D back in the G4/G5 era. I had to come up
> with creative ways to do this. I was just screwing around with basic
> shapes and started making something that looked like a Jet Engine. So I
> kept at it and made a jet engine, then copied it and made a jet to go
> with it. 
> 
> Anyway, I wanted to fly it but that would be a bit much on the 867 MHz
> G4 at the time. I found a very nice plugin for After Effects called 
> tsunami which makes the process of making fairly real water scenes
> simple enough. I took a 2d picture of the San Francisco skyline such
> that you're facing that. Made the water under the view. Then rendered
> what looks like you heading towards the city. The water movement under
> gave the perception of moving. I rendered about 30 seconds of that. Then
> placed that already rendered scene back into After Effects and placed my
> 3D jet into the scene and simply moved it slowly giving the perception
> of altitude. So the jet was only rendered once for one frame and
> superimposed on a rendered scene. 
> 

Do objects (or parts of objects) outside of the camera view add complexity
to the render?  For instance, assuming your jet cockpit or whatever, if
you rendered it in every frame along with the scene, would the render have
to take the entire jet object into its calculations during the render?


> You'll have to think in those kinds of ways. How to cheat a little and
> get the same result. It's fun for a while. I wanted to enter a contest
> once where I was making something similar to the 20th Century Fox
> spotline demo you watch before a movie starts. I had it all done in wire
> frame and let a machine run for a week and it was going no where. The
> contest came and went and I had almost nothing. Today I would have done
> live action and superimposed the search light after. 
> 
> Again, think in those terms. Use less polygons to do the same job. Do
> the minimum needed to get what you visually want. 
> 

Thanks.  I'll keep those things in mind.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#371304

On 2016-09-15, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>> On 2016-09-15, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2016-09-15, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> // snip
>>>> 
>>>>>> It does seem that the center is the center of the universe now. What's
>>>>>> the first app most people reach for these days? I'll bet it is the
>>>>>> browser. And you'll want that wheel, huh? I get it. Just miss the old
>>>>>> days when it comes to mice. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course it goes without saying that web browsing benefits greatly from
>>>>> the wheel, but the wheel is also good for scrolling in terminals that
>>>>> support it.  But middle-click paste is a much smoother operation without
>>>>> a wheel, so the idea of separating the wheel from the middle button
>>>>> seems like the best of both worlds. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, blender makes heavy use of both the middle button and the scroll
>>>>> wheel for separate navigation functions, and it was actually some blender
>>>>> forum where I first saw mention of this mouse.
>>>> 
>>>> Ah well then you have a purpose in mind. How's Blender? Still
>>>> interesting? 
>>>> 
>>>
>>> It's a fun app.  I need to alter my approach to learning it though.
>>> I've just been dabbling with it, thinking of "how do i do x?" then
>>> looking around for how to do x.  That sometimes is successful, but
>>> for the most part it leaves me with huge holes in my understanding
>>> of what's going on.  I bought a book, but finding the discipline
>>> to go through it and all the tutorials online is a different matter.
>>> It also doesn't help that it includes two different render engines,
>>> each with its own set of options.
>>>
>>> Also, i'm afraid it's going to take a render farm to do anything
>>> really fun animation-wise.  This laptop takes 10-20 minutes to
>>> render a single frame with anything approaching decent detail,
>>> so I haven't even bothered try video rendering yet.  The animated
>>> stuff I've posted so far was sort of a preview, and not actually
>>> rendered.
>> 
>> I used to use Maxxon Cinema 4D back in the G4/G5 era. I had to come up
>> with creative ways to do this. I was just screwing around with basic
>> shapes and started making something that looked like a Jet Engine. So I
>> kept at it and made a jet engine, then copied it and made a jet to go
>> with it. 
>> 
>> Anyway, I wanted to fly it but that would be a bit much on the 867 MHz
>> G4 at the time. I found a very nice plugin for After Effects called 
>> tsunami which makes the process of making fairly real water scenes
>> simple enough. I took a 2d picture of the San Francisco skyline such
>> that you're facing that. Made the water under the view. Then rendered
>> what looks like you heading towards the city. The water movement under
>> gave the perception of moving. I rendered about 30 seconds of that. Then
>> placed that already rendered scene back into After Effects and placed my
>> 3D jet into the scene and simply moved it slowly giving the perception
>> of altitude. So the jet was only rendered once for one frame and
>> superimposed on a rendered scene. 
>> 
>
> Do objects (or parts of objects) outside of the camera view add complexity
> to the render?  For instance, assuming your jet cockpit or whatever, if
> you rendered it in every frame along with the scene, would the render have
> to take the entire jet object into its calculations during the render?

I don't think so. Just what the camera sees. Just lower the polygon
count and watch it speed up. 

>> You'll have to think in those kinds of ways. How to cheat a little and
>> get the same result. It's fun for a while. I wanted to enter a contest
>> once where I was making something similar to the 20th Century Fox
>> spotline demo you watch before a movie starts. I had it all done in wire
>> frame and let a machine run for a week and it was going no where. The
>> contest came and went and I had almost nothing. Today I would have done
>> live action and superimposed the search light after. 
>> 
>> Again, think in those terms. Use less polygons to do the same job. Do
>> the minimum needed to get what you visually want. 
>
> Thanks.  I'll keep those things in mind.

:)

-- 
Marek Novotny
https://github.com/marek-novotny

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#371247

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 9/15/16, 12:19 PM, in article ahdjgsd9e.gjidu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
> 
>> But middle-click paste is a much smoother operation without
>> a wheel, so the idea of separating the wheel from the middle button
>> seems like the best of both worlds.
> 
> I could easily create a "paste" button if I wanted to... but have no desire.
> Still, for those who want it I am glad it is there.
> 

Can you implement copy-on-select in a Mac?  If not, then the workflow
would not be as streamlined as X11's select/middle-click process for
copy/paste.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#371265

Snit wrote:

> On 9/15/16, 2:21 PM, in article hjag3eago.aldo9@perch.invalid, "Octavian
> W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 9/15/16, 12:19 PM, in article ahdjgsd9e.gjidu@perch.invalid,
>>> "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> But middle-click paste is a much smoother operation without
>>>> a wheel, so the idea of separating the wheel from the middle button
>>>> seems like the best of both worlds.
>>> 
>>> I could easily create a "paste" button if I wanted to... but have no
>>> desire. Still, for those who want it I am glad it is there.
>> 
>> Can you implement copy-on-select in a Mac?
> 
> Not that I know of... but you can for terminals. I could set it to one
> button on my mouse, though.
> 
>> If not, then the workflow would not be as streamlined as X11's
>> select/middle-click process for copy/paste.
> 
> But it is more consistent. Still, for those who like copy on select, Linux
> has an advantage in that.
> 
> Also, OS X does not lose the buffer / clipboard when you quit a program.
> On Linux that often happens.
> 

No, it does not. If you are running KDE, for example.
You even have the latest clipboard after a reboot then

Gnome/Unity have the same capabilities

Why are you always that utterly wrong about computing things, Mr "IT 
specialist"?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#371288

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 9/15/16, 2:21 PM, in article hjag3eago.aldo9@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 9/15/16, 12:19 PM, in article ahdjgsd9e.gjidu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> But middle-click paste is a much smoother operation without
>>>> a wheel, so the idea of separating the wheel from the middle button
>>>> seems like the best of both worlds.
>>> 
>>> I could easily create a "paste" button if I wanted to... but have no desire.
>>> Still, for those who want it I am glad it is there.
>> 
>> Can you implement copy-on-select in a Mac?
> 
> Not that I know of... but you can for terminals.

Between terminals?  From other apps to a terminal?

> I could set it to one
> button on my mouse, though.
> 

One button for copy after text is selected, I assume.


>> If not, then the workflow would not be as streamlined as X11's
>> select/middle-click process for copy/paste.
> 
> But it is more consistent.

How?

> Still, for those who like copy on select, Linux
> has an advantage in that.
>

Everybody who tries it likes it.
 
> Also, OS X does not lose the buffer / clipboard when you quit a program. On
> Linux that often happens.
> 
> 

The primary selection gets lost, but I haven't seen clipboard contents
get lost (i.e., copy/paste with select/right-click->copy).  Also, if you
need the primary, and for some reason you need to close the app before
pasting, you can use xcb and keep it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#370970

On 9/14/2016 7:07 PM, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote:


> https://vid.me/Ig27


It's amazing how incompetent you are (unable to resize windows), and how 
much you whine about the tiniest things.

How come you don't whine about your inability to make a living with 
"New"/Linux?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#371112

On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 20:46:03 -0400, DFS wrote:

> 
> and how much you whine about the tiniest things.
> 

It's amazing how you are compelled to defend Microshit
against all evidence and reason.

But this time there is NO denying.  Microshit fails
in a H-U-U-U-G-E way.

Any highly creative and productive person will copy
and paste hundreds of times per day and this "tiny"
issue quickly becomes a BIG, GIGANTIC, HUMONGOUS
problem.  GNU/Linux provides a smooth and natural
interface that facilitates such activity, but Microshit
gives only that clunky UI that actually IMPEDES
the copy/paste operation.

Notice how the GNU/Linux UI grants complete control
over ALL window behaviors, whereas Microshit locks
the user into a single clunky and junky framework.

To a do-nothing like you it's a "tiny" issue, but to
a CREATIVE and PRODUCTIVE person it make a TREMENDOUS
difference.

The dumb-fuck shill loses again.  Now watch as he invents
some inane defense to obscure the ugly reality that is
Microshit.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#371574

On 9/15/2016 10:31 AM, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote:


> Any highly creative and productive person will copy
> and paste hundreds of times per day


A creative and productive person would automate that kind of manual 
drudgery on day one.

As a brainless GuhNoo CLI flunky, you're lost unless you have a piece of 
crap like CoolEdit in front of you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#371627

On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 20:15:09 -0400, DFS wrote:

> 
> A creative and productive person would ...
> 

Only a creative and productive person knows what a creative
and productive person would or would not do.

You do NOT qualify.

Therefore, shut the fuck up and return to your Microshit
prison.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#371681

On 9/17/2016 1:25 PM, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 20:15:09 -0400, DFS wrote:
>
>>
>> A creative and productive person would ...

not snip and run.  But you're the moronic Feeb Russell - it's your style.



> Only a creative and productive person knows what a creative
> and productive person would or would not do.

If you were creative you wouldn't accept a Windows job.

If you were productive you wouldn't accept a Linux job.



> You do NOT qualify.
   >
> Therefore, shut the fuck up and return to your Microshit
> prison.

Where you live M-F 8-5.

Hey, is it the Windows money or the Windows work you like the most? 
Probably the money; "advocates" always go for the MS money.

Like the founder of Gentoo - he went to work for Microsoft.  You would, 
too, if the money was right.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#370995

Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> wrote:
> When it comes to the performance of a most fundamental task
> this video demo shows that GNU/Linux is far superior to that
> piece-of-junk OS knows as Microshit.
> 
> Happy viewing.
> 
> https://vid.me/Ig27
> 

Fabtard, GNU is pronounced, "gah noo."
Otherwise, awesome video.  Funny as hell.
BTW, have you seen Gohde anywhere?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#371021

nym shifting Fabian Russell wrote:
>
> his video demo shows that GNU/Linux
>

A fagtard video from the lifelong virgin and his squeaky little voice.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#371750

On 9/14/2016 7:07 PM, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote:
> When it comes to the performance of a most fundamental task
> this video demo shows that GNU/Linux is far superior to that
> piece-of-junk OS knows as Microshit.
>
> Happy viewing.
>
> https://vid.me/Ig27


With this transcript, you can enjoy the spoken eloquence of a drunk, 
medicated, 12-year-old Linux advocate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
OK OK good evening ladies and gentlemen
Welcome back to "New Linux The Power Thereof"
This time we're gonna take a look at essential tasks.
And this time we shall see beyond all doubt, with extreme clarity,
just how fucking superior New Linux is compared to Microsoft Windows

This time we're gonna do an extremely simple task, extremely simple but 
very, very important.  We have two windows here, that we've positioned 
like this so they overlap, and it's our our job to to transfer some 
information over from this window to this window by first selecting it - 
selecting something in this window and then pasting it over there.  And 
uh something else here we'll just select, and we'll paste.  Verrryyy 
quickly, very simple, very smooth, very natural

Now, let me just say that what I've just done is FUCKING IMPOSSIBLE to 
do on Microsoft Windows.  FUCKING IMPOSSIBLE.  For one thing, after you 
select something in this window, you then have to do something like 
Ctrl+C or something to uh copy it and then you have to go over here and 
do a Ctrl+V to paste.  when when.  You don't have to do that with Linux, 
you don't have to do that.  Just just select with the mouse, and then 
middle-mouse button here to paste.  Very simple.

But that's not the important thing, really.  The important thing is, 
here, that if you did try, if you tried to do this with with Microsoft 
Windows, after you got your your windows all lined up, ya know, if you 
went to this window here on the left and clicked with the mouse what 
would happen would be this... it would do, it would focus the window and 
raise it... and now you can select it and you can copy it, but then, now 
you gotta go back over here and you gotta raise this fuckin' window, and 
it it's been you know it's been obliterated all that time then you then 
you guh then you go back over here and same thing. See?  It just. You know.

Whereas with Linux it doesn't do it. (mumble) it stays.  It stays that 
way... until you tell it otherwise.  Until you tell it otherwise it 
stays that way.  IT STAYS THAT WAY.  IT STAYS UNDER.  IT STAYS FUCKING 
UNDER UNTIL YOU TELL IT NOT TO.  But with Windows, nope, soon as you 
click in there "oop dere it goes!" you obliterate you know (mumbling) 
back over here and gotta do the same fucking thing over here.  FUCKIN' 
FUCKIN' SHIT!  WHAT IS THIS SHIT?  STAY DOWN THERE!  STAY DOWN THERE 
WHERE I PUT YOU FIRST TIME!  STAY DOWN THERE WHERE I PUT YOU THE FIRST 
GODDAMN FUCKIN' TIME!  But no, it doesn't do it.  Doesn't fucking do it. 
   Because Microsoft is a piece of fucking shit!  A simple task like 
this?  Very smoooth, very very fucking smooth, no problem, no fuckin' 
problem.  Just copy, copy all you fuckin' want.  They stay, they stay 
(mumble) where you put 'em.  With Microsoft they can be jumpin' like 
that, jumpin' back and forth like a (mumble).  It's it's really 
annoying.  It's DISTRACTING, annoying, DISTRACTING, annoying.  Make me 
fuckin' wanna SCREAM!

No sorry, sorry.  When it comes to essential tasks... New Linux has the 
power.  And only New Linux.  So all you Microsoft users and all you 
Microsoft supporters... all we can say to you... is this... FAHCK YOU! 
FAHCK YOU!

Be a real man for Christ's sake... for the first time in your life be a 
REAL FUCKIN' man... use New Linux... always.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#371751

DFS wrote:

> OK OK good evening ladies and gentlemen
> Welcome back to "New Linux The Power Thereof"
> This time we're gonna take a look at essential tasks.
> And this time we shall see beyond all doubt, with extreme clarity,
> just how fucking superior New Linux is compared to Microsoft Windows

Oh, my. And I thought Snit's videos were a laugh riot.

"Fabian" simply has to be a troll.

Where can I find New Linux? I'm tired of Old Linux.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#371756

Tattoo Vampire wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> DFS wrote:
>
>> OK OK good evening ladies and gentlemen
>> Welcome back to "New Linux The Power Thereof"
>> This time we're gonna take a look at essential tasks.
>> And this time we shall see beyond all doubt, with extreme clarity,
>> just how fucking superior New Linux is compared to Microsoft Windows
>
> Oh, my. And I thought Snit's videos were a laugh riot.
>
> "Fabian" simply has to be a troll.

No doubt.  Never was a doubt.

-- 
An avocado-tone refrigerator would look good on your resume.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#371774

On 9/18/2016 2:52 PM, Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> DFS wrote:
>
>> OK OK good evening ladies and gentlemen
>> Welcome back to "New Linux The Power Thereof"
>> This time we're gonna take a look at essential tasks.
>> And this time we shall see beyond all doubt, with extreme clarity,
>> just how fucking superior New Linux is compared to Microsoft Windows
>
> Oh, my. And I thought Snit's videos were a laugh riot.
>
> "Fabian" simply has to be a troll.


He's an angry weirdo with delusions that Linux and Islam will both "gain 
global ascendancy".

He also hopes to get laid before he dies.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#371778

On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 6:06:02 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote:
> On 9/18/2016 2:52 PM, Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> > DFS wrote:
> >
> >> OK OK good evening ladies and gentlemen
> >> Welcome back to "New Linux The Power Thereof"
> >> This time we're gonna take a look at essential tasks.
> >> And this time we shall see beyond all doubt, with extreme clarity,
> >> just how fucking superior New Linux is compared to Microsoft Windows
> >
> > Oh, my. And I thought Snit's videos were a laugh riot.
> >
> > "Fabian" simply has to be a troll.
> 
> 
> He's an angry weirdo with delusions that Linux and Islam will both "gain 
> global ascendancy".

Linux already has, just not on the desktop GUI based OS. As for Islam:

<http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/04/23/why-muslims-are-the-worlds-fastest-growing-religious-group/>

> He also hopes to get laid before he dies.

Probably ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web