Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #481333 > unrolled thread

The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-13 20:45 -0500
    Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-14 02:02 +0000
      Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-12-14 01:13 -0700
    Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-13 22:36 -0500
      Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 20:45 -0700
      Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-14 10:05 +0000
      Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-14 15:51 -0500
        Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-17 08:50 -0500
          Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-17 07:31 -0800
            Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-17 10:54 -0500
              Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-17 12:06 -0500
                Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-17 12:39 -0500
                  Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-17 19:10 +0000
                    Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-17 11:39 -0800
                    Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-17 14:11 -0600
                      Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-17 20:30 +0000
                    Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-17 17:08 -0500
                      Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-18 03:41 +0000
                        Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-18 22:10 -0500
                Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-17 11:50 -0600
          Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-17 11:26 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#481333 — The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards

Left side of piehole:

The GNU/Linux community rejects standardization.  An attempt at creating 
standards, the LSB or Linux Standards Base, is ignored by most distros 
-- as it should be.



Right side of piehole:

GNU/Linux and open source software are ruled by specifications and 
standards.




Back and forth goes the jackass, taking one side then the other.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#481336

On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 20:45:07 -0500, DFS wrote:

> Left side of piehole:
> 

No, no!  That's the RIGHT side!

Idiot.

> 
> Right side of piehole:
> 

No, no!  That's the LEFT side!

Imbecile.


The stooge, being the supreme dumb fuck, always fails to comprehend
the true and undeniable reality:

I am large.  I contain MULTITUDES.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481343

On 12/13/2018 7:02 PM, F. Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 20:45:07 -0500, DFS wrote:
> 
>> Left side of piehole:
>>
> 
> No, no!  That's the RIGHT side!
> 
> Idiot.
> 
>>
>> Right side of piehole:
>>
> 
> No, no!  That's the LEFT side!
> 
> Imbecile.
> 
> 
> The stooge, being the supreme dumb fuck, always fails to comprehend
> the true and undeniable reality:
> 
> I am large.  I contain MULTITUDES.

I've noticed none of it is palatable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481338

On 2018-12-13 8:45 p.m., DFS wrote:
> 
> Left side of piehole:
> 
> The GNU/Linux community rejects standardization.  An attempt at creating 
> standards, the LSB or Linux Standards Base, is ignored by most distros 
> -- as it should be.
> 
> 
> 
> Right side of piehole:
> 
> GNU/Linux and open source software are ruled by specifications and 
> standards.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Back and forth goes the jackass, taking one side then the other.

All I know for sure is that LibreOffice documents can be saved to PDF if 
I choose and everyone knows how to open that kind of document.

-- 
SilverSlimer
Free software advocate
Minds: @silverslimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481339

On 12/13/18 8:36 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On 2018-12-13 8:45 p.m., DFS wrote:
>>
>> Left side of piehole:
>>
>> The GNU/Linux community rejects standardization.  An attempt at 
>> creating standards, the LSB or Linux Standards Base, is ignored by 
>> most distros -- as it should be.
>>
>>
>>
>> Right side of piehole:
>>
>> GNU/Linux and open source software are ruled by specifications and 
>> standards.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Back and forth goes the jackass, taking one side then the other.
> 
> All I know for sure is that LibreOffice documents can be saved to PDF if 
> I choose and everyone knows how to open that kind of document.
> 

Is there ANY word processor that cannot save to PDF these days? Any 
program with printable output? At least on macOS I cannot think of a 
single one. Heck, I can "print" the terminal to PDF.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481344

On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 22:36:30 -0500, SilverSlimer wrote:

> 
> All I know for sure is that LibreOffice documents can be saved to PDF if 
> I choose and everyone knows how to open that kind of document.
>

Microshit Orifice, since 2007, can handle the Open Document format
that is produced by LibreOffice.

I'm not sure, however (I'll have to check) if the default program
on Microshit for handling Open Document format is set to MS Orifice.
If it is, then all a Microshit user has to do is click on the ODF
file to be able to open it -- and clicking is ALL that a Microshit
user knows how to do.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481377

On 12/13/2018 10:36 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On 2018-12-13 8:45 p.m., DFS wrote:
>>
>> Left side of piehole:
>>
>> The GNU/Linux community rejects standardization.  An attempt at 
>> creating standards, the LSB or Linux Standards Base, is ignored by 
>> most distros -- as it should be.
>>
>>
>>
>> Right side of piehole:
>>
>> GNU/Linux and open source software are ruled by specifications and 
>> standards.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Back and forth goes the jackass, taking one side then the other.
> 
> All I know for sure is that LibreOffice documents can be saved to PDF if 
> I choose and everyone knows how to open that kind of document.


Available for MS Office for 11 years (since ver 2007).

Even if it weren't in MS Office, save to .pdf is not nearly enough to 
recommend LibreOffice.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481442

On 2018-12-14 3:51 p.m., DFS wrote:
> On 12/13/2018 10:36 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>> On 2018-12-13 8:45 p.m., DFS wrote:
>>>
>>> Left side of piehole:
>>>
>>> The GNU/Linux community rejects standardization.  An attempt at 
>>> creating standards, the LSB or Linux Standards Base, is ignored by 
>>> most distros -- as it should be.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Right side of piehole:
>>>
>>> GNU/Linux and open source software are ruled by specifications and 
>>> standards.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Back and forth goes the jackass, taking one side then the other.
>>
>> All I know for sure is that LibreOffice documents can be saved to PDF 
>> if I choose and everyone knows how to open that kind of document.
> 
> 
> Available for MS Office for 11 years (since ver 2007).
> 
> Even if it weren't in MS Office, save to .pdf is not nearly enough to 
> recommend LibreOffice.

I'm not the type to demand perfection from free products. To me, a free 
product is kind of like an inexpensive car; you know it'll get you to 
where you want to go, but you might have to fact a few issues along the 
way. That's LibreOffice for me.

However, I know that I will eventually get the feature free of charge.

-- 
SilverSlimer
Free software advocate
Minds: @silverslimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481460

On Monday, December 17, 2018 at 8:50:37 AM UTC-5, SilverSlimer wrote:

> 
> I'm not the type to demand perfection from free products. To me, a free 
> product is 
>

That's a very bad attitude.  Free software is not "free" as in beer
but "free" as in freedom.

But then a freeloading idiot like you could not comprehend this
most essential difference.

You probably regularly buy lottery tickets.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481466

On 12/17/2018 10:31 AM, fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, December 17, 2018 at 8:50:37 AM UTC-5, SilverSlimer wrote:
> 
>>
>> I'm not the type to demand perfection from free products. To me, a free
>> product is
>>
> 
> That's a very bad attitude.  Free software is not "free" as in beer
> but "free" as in freedom.
> 
> But then a freeloading idiot like you could not comprehend this
> most essential difference.
> 
> You probably regularly buy lottery tickets.


Your mother is your lottery, asshole.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481479

On 2018-12-17 10:54 a.m., DFS wrote:
> On 12/17/2018 10:31 AM, fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Monday, December 17, 2018 at 8:50:37 AM UTC-5, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'm not the type to demand perfection from free products. To me, a free
>>> product is
>>>
>>
>> That's a very bad attitude.  Free software is not "free" as in beer
>> but "free" as in freedom.
>>
>> But then a freeloading idiot like you could not comprehend this
>> most essential difference.
>>
>> You probably regularly buy lottery tickets.
> 
> 
> Your mother is your lottery, asshole.

Meh, I already filtered him a while back. I don't see a point to reading 
his repetitive garbage.

-- 
SilverSlimer
Free software advocate
Minds: @silverslimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481487

On 12/17/2018 12:06 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On 2018-12-17 10:54 a.m., DFS wrote:
>> On 12/17/2018 10:31 AM, fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Monday, December 17, 2018 at 8:50:37 AM UTC-5, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not the type to demand perfection from free products. To me, a free
>>>> product is
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's a very bad attitude.  Free software is not "free" as in beer
>>> but "free" as in freedom.
>>>
>>> But then a freeloading idiot like you could not comprehend this
>>> most essential difference.
>>>
>>> You probably regularly buy lottery tickets.
>>
>>
>> Your mother is your lottery, asshole.
> 
> Meh, I already filtered him a while back. I don't see a point to reading 
> his repetitive garbage.


Feeb's a serious asshole, but he's smart and committed to the crapware 
(for hobby use only) and likes to argue and insult, and so he's my only 
real foil here.

shitv is a 3rd-party replying lamer.  owl's gotten so old he's only 
interested in gardening and birdwatching and calligraphy.  Carroll is 
busy playing street guitar and holding out a GPL donation cup.

cola is truly on life support.  We desperately need new blood.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481493

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> owl's gotten so old he's only 
> interested in gardening and birdwatching and calligraphy.

I don't know what those things are, but I know yesterday was
leg day, so today it's chest and shoulders baby.  Ooh rah!
Damn, I don't know how the wimmins handle my fine self.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481494

On Monday, December 17, 2018 at 2:10:39 PM UTC-5, owl wrote:

>
> Damn, I don't know how the wimmins handle my fine self.
>

I hope you've gotten the papilloma vaccine.

It is estimated that 20% of American bitches are infected with
the papilloma virus.  It is a veritable epidemic.

But that's 20% of ALL bitches.  If we consider only the good-lookers
then the frequency is probably close to 80-90%.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481495

owl wrote:

>I know yesterday was
>leg day, so today it's chest and shoulders baby.  Ooh rah!
>Damn, I don't know how the wimmins handle my fine self.

Maybe it's your face.

-- 
'So it really boils down to "I hate Microsoft and I hate Apple"
because they aren't free.'  -  some POS that calls itself "GreyCloud",
lying shamelessly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481497

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> owl wrote:
> 
>>I know yesterday was
>>leg day, so today it's chest and shoulders baby.  Ooh rah!
>>Damn, I don't know how the wimmins handle my fine self.
> 
> Maybe it's your face.
> 

Could be.  Ask your mom for me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481506

On 12/17/2018 2:10 PM, owl wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> owl's gotten so old he's only
>> interested in gardening and birdwatching and calligraphy.
> 
> I don't know what those things are, but I know yesterday was
> leg day, so today it's chest and shoulders baby.  Ooh rah!

Go easy on the TRT there, fella!


> Damn, I don't know how the wimmins handle my fine self.

Two bags.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481524

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 12/17/2018 2:10 PM, owl wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> owl's gotten so old he's only
>>> interested in gardening and birdwatching and calligraphy.
>> 
>> I don't know what those things are, but I know yesterday was
>> leg day, so today it's chest and shoulders baby.  Ooh rah!
> 
> Go easy on the TRT there, fella!
> 

Maybe I should get mine checked.  Can you have too much?

> 
>> Damn, I don't know how the wimmins handle my fine self.
> 
> Two bags.


I didn't know jelly came in bags.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481573

On 12/17/2018 10:41 PM, owl wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> On 12/17/2018 2:10 PM, owl wrote:
>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>> owl's gotten so old he's only
>>>> interested in gardening and birdwatching and calligraphy.
>>>
>>> I don't know what those things are, but I know yesterday was
>>> leg day, so today it's chest and shoulders baby.  Ooh rah!
>>
>> Go easy on the TRT there, fella!
>>
> 
> Maybe I should get mine checked.  Can you have too much?


Yes.  I cut back on the T when I began looking like this:

https://imgur.com/a/0V2eBYe


Now I'm more svelte:

https://imgur.com/a/RZMJGMO



>>> Damn, I don't know how the wimmins handle my fine self.
>>
>> Two bags.
> 
> 
> I didn't know jelly came in bags.

Two paper bags: one on your head, one on hers in case yours falls off...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#481489

SilverSlimer wrote:

> Dumfsck wrote:
>>
>> Fabian wrote:
>>>
>>> You probably regularly buy lottery tickets.
>> 
>> Your mother is your lottery, asshole.
>
>Meh, I already filtered him a while back. I don't see a point to reading 
>his repetitive garbage.

Yet you read Dumfsck's posts.  How many times has that dumb fsck, and
his shitty pals, repeated their "you can't even give it away" garbage,
over the years?

-- 
How long has Linux been around?
About 15 years?
And Linux is free?
Linux must be defective.

             - flathead

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web