Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #481339
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards |
| Date | 2018-12-13 20:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g7gna9F7el5U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <NXDQD.5973$gU6.298@fx33.iad> <2zFQD.228$mm5.3@fx09.iad> |
On 12/13/18 8:36 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On 2018-12-13 8:45 p.m., DFS wrote: >> >> Left side of piehole: >> >> The GNU/Linux community rejects standardization. An attempt at >> creating standards, the LSB or Linux Standards Base, is ignored by >> most distros -- as it should be. >> >> >> >> Right side of piehole: >> >> GNU/Linux and open source software are ruled by specifications and >> standards. >> >> >> >> >> Back and forth goes the jackass, taking one side then the other. > > All I know for sure is that LibreOffice documents can be saved to PDF if > I choose and everyone knows how to open that kind of document. > Is there ANY word processor that cannot save to PDF these days? Any program with printable output? At least on macOS I cannot think of a single one. Heck, I can "print" the terminal to PDF. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-13 20:45 -0500
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-14 02:02 +0000
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-12-14 01:13 -0700
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-13 22:36 -0500
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-13 20:45 -0700
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-14 10:05 +0000
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-14 15:51 -0500
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-17 08:50 -0500
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-17 07:31 -0800
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-17 10:54 -0500
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-17 12:06 -0500
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-17 12:39 -0500
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-17 19:10 +0000
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-17 11:39 -0800
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-17 14:11 -0600
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-17 20:30 +0000
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-17 17:08 -0500
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-18 03:41 +0000
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-18 22:10 -0500
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-17 11:50 -0600
Re: The ridiculous Feeb Russell: on standards Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-17 11:26 -0700
csiph-web