Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #329096 > unrolled thread

64-bit Linux ... What a Joke!

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 04:17 -0700
    Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-28 19:30 +0000
      Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-28 20:49 +0100
        Köhlmann, try removing that bug that crawled up your arse some 20-years ago. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 14:11 -0700
          Re: Köhlmann, try removing that bug that crawled up your arse some 20-years ago. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 17:25 -0400
        Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-28 22:02 +0000
          Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-29 07:05 -0500
            Re: Another Idiot Troll ... What a Joke! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:28 +0000
              Re: Another Idiot Troll ... What a Joke! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 08:51 -0700
            Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-29 19:00 -0500
              Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 20:24 -0400
                Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-30 01:26 +0100
                  Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 20:31 -0400
                    Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-30 01:39 +0100
                      Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 21:18 -0400
                    Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-10-29 20:46 -0400
                      The mind/body weakens with age. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-10-30 01:20 -0700
                  Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-10-29 20:41 -0400
                    Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 21:22 -0400
                      Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 21:42 -0400
                      Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 15:52 -0600
                    Old&Ugly. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-10-30 00:52 -0700
                      Re: Old&Ugly. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 06:11 -0700
                      Re: Old&Ugly. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 09:32 -0400
                  Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-29 20:13 -0500
                    Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 21:26 -0400
      Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 14:08 -0700
      Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-28 20:13 -0500
        Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 19:11 -0700
          Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-29 10:05 +0100
        Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-29 06:14 -0400
    Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 20:56 -0700
      Re: 64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 22:36 -0700
        Takuya Saitoh, as previously exposed by Moi, is a Linux Fraud.  Where is your Linux Distro, Putz? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 06:25 -0700
          Re: Takuya Saitoh, as previously exposed by Moi, is a Linux Fraud.  Where is your Linux Distro, Putz? Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 08:37 -0700
      Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 06:23 -0700
        Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 10:46 -0400
        Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 13:06 -0700
          Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 14:02 -0700
            Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 21:49 +0000
              Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 15:21 -0700
                Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-31 08:12 +0000
                  Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 03:38 -0700
            Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 15:08 -0700
              Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 15:12 -0700
            Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 15:22 -0700
              Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 19:27 -0400
                Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 17:59 -0700
              Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 17:31 -0700
              Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 10:31 -0600
                Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 12:06 -0800
                  Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 17:38 -0500
                    Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 16:09 -0800
                Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 22:51 -0800
                  Why do Fucking Morons like you always manage to congregate in Linux circles? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 05:26 -0800
      Re: Another Idiot Troll ... What a Joke! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:26 +0000
    64-bit Linux ... What a Joke! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 10:31 -0700

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#329865

On 10/29/15 19:39, Snit wrote:
> On 10/29/15, 6:22 PM, in article n0ugkm$2s2$2@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna"
> <.m@nsn.s>  wrote:
>
>> On 2015-10-29 8:41 PM, Ezekiel wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Melzzzzz"<mel@zzzzz.com>  wrote in message
>>>> news:20151030012658.1236bf43@maxa-pc...
>>>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 20:24:14 -0400
>>>> Charmed Tuna<.m@nsn.s>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But not enough to break him out of my KF.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, you have enough of your own socks to complain about and
>>>>> killfile.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> John is big kook, but biggest kook title goes to Jeff Relf.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There's nothing wrong with someone being different. The problem with Gohde
>>> is that he's a broken record. All he can do is repeat the same stupidity for
>>> weeks.
>>
>> Maybe he and Snit should get married?
>
> It is now legal!
>
>
Oh-oh... you just opened up Pandoras' box.  Watch out for the herd.

-- 
When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old
Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you
could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the
bottom, and have a longer blanket."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329665 — Old&Ugly.

Melzzz and Ezekiel wrote:
> > [John_Gohde] is big kook, 
> > but biggest kook title goes to Jeff Relf.
> 
> There's nothing wrong with someone being different. 
> The problem with Gohde is that he's a broken record. 
> All he can do is repeat the same stupidity for weeks.

John_Gohde has brain damage; 
his memory is really, really bad.

I'm not as old&ugly as him, 
but I'm getting there fast.

I avoid Melzzz's posts, usually,
so I don't know why he thinks I'm a "kook".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329685 — Re: Old&Ugly.

On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 3:52:47 AM UTC-4, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> Melzzz and Ezekiel wrote:
> > > [John_Gohde] is big kook, 
> > > but biggest kook title goes to Jeff Relf.
> > 
> > There's nothing wrong with someone being different. 
> > The problem with Gohde is that he's a broken record. 
> > All he can do is repeat the same stupidity for weeks.
> 
> John_Gohde has brain damage; 
> his memory is really, really bad.
> 
> I'm not as old&ugly as him, 
> but I'm getting there fast.
> 
> I avoid Melzzz's posts, usually,
> so I don't know why he thinks I'm a "kook".


Jeff-Relf.Me needs to buy eyeglasses and STOP screwing up my monitor with his huge fonts.

Je suis Moi, posted from Mint.
Created his 1st pet Linux distribution, so that it looked and behaved *exactly* the way that he wanted it to, in October 2014, but was wise enough to move on. Sadly, you cannot believe what ANY Linux person is claiming at face value most of the time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bVDQ4rVrM4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329696 — Re: Old&Ugly.

On 2015-10-30 3:52 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> Melzzz and Ezekiel wrote:
>>> [John_Gohde] is big kook, 
>>> but biggest kook title goes to Jeff Relf.
>>
>> There's nothing wrong with someone being different. 
>> The problem with Gohde is that he's a broken record. 
>> All he can do is repeat the same stupidity for weeks.
> 
> John_Gohde has brain damage; 
> his memory is really, really bad.

We noticed.

> I'm not as old&ugly as him, 
> but I'm getting there fast.

Sorry.

> I avoid Melzzz's posts, usually,
> so I don't know why he thinks I'm a "kook".

Melzzzz can be entertaining when he's not in advocretin mode.

-- 
Charmed Tuna

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329610

On 10/29/2015 7:26 PM, Melzzzzz wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 20:24:14 -0400
> Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>
>> On 2015-10-29 8:00 PM, Nobody wrote:
>>> On 10/29/2015 7:05 AM, chrisv wrote:
>>>> William Poaster wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Peter Köhlmann posted:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> vallor wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John Gohde wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <snip troll drivel>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is bullshit.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, it's complete & utter bullshit
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not just that. *Every* claim he made about 64bits is total
>>>>>> bollocks.
>>>>>
>>>>> As is he.
>>>>
>>>> "John" aspires to be the biggest kook in cola.
>>>>
>>>> Which is *quite* ambitious.
>>>
>>> But not enough to break him out of my KF.
>>
>> Yeah, you have enough of your own socks to complain about and
>> killfile.
>>
>>
>
> John is big kook, but biggest kook title goes to Jeff Relf.
>
He's in my KF too.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329618

On 2015-10-29 9:13 PM, Nobody wrote:
> On 10/29/2015 7:26 PM, Melzzzzz wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 20:24:14 -0400
>> Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2015-10-29 8:00 PM, Nobody wrote:
>>>> On 10/29/2015 7:05 AM, chrisv wrote:
>>>>> William Poaster wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter Köhlmann posted:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> vallor wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> John Gohde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <snip troll drivel>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is bullshit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, it's complete & utter bullshit
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not just that. *Every* claim he made about 64bits is total
>>>>>>> bollocks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As is he.
>>>>>
>>>>> "John" aspires to be the biggest kook in cola.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which is *quite* ambitious.
>>>>
>>>> But not enough to break him out of my KF.
>>>
>>> Yeah, you have enough of your own socks to complain about and
>>> killfile.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> John is big kook, but biggest kook title goes to Jeff Relf.
>>
> He's in my KF too.

Hi, Drew P. Bawls!

-- 
Charmed Tuna

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329275

On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 3:32:53 PM UTC-4, vallor wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:17:10 -0700, John Gohde wrote:
> 
> > Moi found out that most of the Linux Applets do NOT work in 64-bit
> > Cinnamon Mint, on day one.
> > 
> > In other words, using 64-bit Linux is a joke since far too many of the
> > Linux APPs don't work in it.  Furthermore, 64t-bit APPs are not properly
> > segregated from the 32-bit ONLY APPs in any Linux Desktop distro.
> > 
> > Any body using a 64-bit Linux desktop is lying about how great it is. 
> > Why is Moi NOT surprised?
> > 
> > Yeah, these Linux clowns can barely produce 32-bit APPs that update
> > properly, let alone fool with 64-bit versions.  Maybe in another
> > 20-years - LOL?
> 
> This is bullshit.


Fits right in with the other bullshit on COLA, huh?

Je suis Moi, posted from Mint.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bVDQ4rVrM4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329345

On 2015-10-28, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:17:10 -0700, John Gohde wrote:
>
>> Moi found out that most of the Linux Applets do NOT work in 64-bit
>> Cinnamon Mint, on day one.
>> 
>> In other words, using 64-bit Linux is a joke since far too many of the
>> Linux APPs don't work in it.  Furthermore, 64t-bit APPs are not properly

    Bullshit.

>> segregated from the 32-bit ONLY APPs in any Linux Desktop distro.

    Why would that even be an issue EVER (in any OS).

    The only example I can think of that even makes any sense is the
32-bit versus 64-bit ODBC configurator in Windows.

>> 
>> Any body using a 64-bit Linux desktop is lying about how great it is. 
>> Why is Moi NOT surprised?
>> 
>> Yeah, these Linux clowns can barely produce 32-bit APPs that update
>> properly, let alone fool with 64-bit versions.  Maybe in another
>> 20-years - LOL?
>
> This is bullshit.
>

   ...yeah, more nonsense. Verbose nonsense, but nonsense.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329347

On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 9:30:12 PM UTC-4, JEDIDIAH wrote:
> On 2015-10-28, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:17:10 -0700, John Gohde wrote:
> >
> >> Moi found out that most of the Linux Applets do NOT work in 64-bit
> >> Cinnamon Mint, on day one.
> >> 
> >> In other words, using 64-bit Linux is a joke since far too many of the
> >> Linux APPs don't work in it.  Furthermore, 64t-bit APPs are not properly
> 
>     Bullshit.
> 
> >> segregated from the 32-bit ONLY APPs in any Linux Desktop distro.
> 
>     Why would that even be an issue EVER (in any OS).
> 
>     The only example I can think of that even makes any sense is the
> 32-bit versus 64-bit ODBC configurator in Windows.
> 
> >> 
> >> Any body using a 64-bit Linux desktop is lying about how great it is. 
> >> Why is Moi NOT surprised?
> >> 
> >> Yeah, these Linux clowns can barely produce 32-bit APPs that update
> >> properly, let alone fool with 64-bit versions.  Maybe in another
> >> 20-years - LOL?
> >
> > This is bullshit.
> >
> 
>    ...yeah, more nonsense. Verbose nonsense, but nonsense.


Ah! Evidence of delusional thinking among the EXTREME Linux Kooks!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329357

John Gohde wrote:

> On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 9:30:12 PM UTC-4, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>> On 2015-10-28, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:17:10 -0700, John Gohde wrote:
>> >
>> >> Moi found out that most of the Linux Applets do NOT work in 64-bit
>> >> Cinnamon Mint, on day one.
>> >> 
>> >> In other words, using 64-bit Linux is a joke since far too many of the
>> >> Linux APPs don't work in it.  Furthermore, 64t-bit APPs are not
>> >> properly
>> 
>>     Bullshit.
>> 
>> >> segregated from the 32-bit ONLY APPs in any Linux Desktop distro.
>> 
>>     Why would that even be an issue EVER (in any OS).
>> 
>>     The only example I can think of that even makes any sense is the
>> 32-bit versus 64-bit ODBC configurator in Windows.
>> 
>> >> 
>> >> Any body using a 64-bit Linux desktop is lying about how great it is.
>> >> Why is Moi NOT surprised?
>> >> 
>> >> Yeah, these Linux clowns can barely produce 32-bit APPs that update
>> >> properly, let alone fool with 64-bit versions.  Maybe in another
>> >> 20-years - LOL?
>> >
>> > This is bullshit.
>> >
>> 
>>    ...yeah, more nonsense. Verbose nonsense, but nonsense.
> 
> 
> Ah! Evidence of delusional thinking among the EXTREME Linux Kooks!

No. Evidence of abject stupidity on your part

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329361

JEDIDIAH wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2015-10-28, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:17:10 -0700, John Gohde wrote:
>>
>>> Moi found out that most of the Linux Applets do NOT work in 64-bit
>>> Cinnamon Mint, on day one.
>>> 
>>> In other words, using 64-bit Linux is a joke since far too many of the
>>> Linux APPs don't work in it.  Furthermore, 64t-bit APPs are not properly
>
>     Bullshit.
>
>>> segregated from the 32-bit ONLY APPs in any Linux Desktop distro.
>
>     Why would that even be an issue EVER (in any OS).
>
>     The only example I can think of that even makes any sense is the
> 32-bit versus 64-bit ODBC configurator in Windows.

Uhhh, that particular bit of "code" makes sense only if you think
it proper that a programmer couldn't make an single application that 
can handle <laughing> 32-bit versus 64-bit "ODBC".

Maybe some pointy-hair at Microsoft thought it would "cause confusion"
or take too much "testing".

>    ...yeah, more nonsense. Verbose nonsense, but nonsense.

Not even the other trolls support this particular wackjob.

-- 
You will be a winner today.  Pick a fight with a four-year-old.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329351

On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:17:10 -0700, John Gohde wrote:

> Moi found out that most of the Linux Applets do NOT work in 64-bit
> Cinnamon Mint, on day one.


No idea what you're calling an "applet" in this context, but Applications 
work just fine in 64-bit mode.  

> In other words, using 64-bit Linux is a joke since far too many of the
> Linux APPs don't work in it.  Furthermore, 64t-bit APPs are not properly
> segregated from the 32-bit ONLY APPs in any Linux Desktop distro.

Why segregate them at all?  There's little need to.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329356

On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 1:08:11 PM UTC+9, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:17:10 -0700, John Gohde wrote:
> 
> > Moi found out that most of the Linux Applets do NOT work in 64-bit
> > Cinnamon Mint, on day one.
> 
> 
> No idea what you're calling an "applet" in this context, but Applications 
> work just fine in 64-bit mode.  
> 
> > In other words, using 64-bit Linux is a joke since far too many of the
> > Linux APPs don't work in it.  Furthermore, 64t-bit APPs are not properly
> > segregated from the 32-bit ONLY APPs in any Linux Desktop distro.
> 
> Why segregate them at all?  There's little need to.

GodHesDumb is an idiot who cannot install proper support for 32bit only apps in his Mint let to compile applications in 64bit mode...

Dumpster hardware is still 32bit only in Richmond, not in Japan though ;-)

Moi is aging as fast as the 32bit world...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329384 — Takuya Saitoh, as previously exposed by Moi, is a Linux Fraud. Where is your Linux Distro, Putz?

On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 1:36:48 AM UTC-4, Takuya Saitoh wrote:
> On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 1:08:11 PM UTC+9, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:17:10 -0700, John Gohde wrote:
> > 
> > > Moi found out that most of the Linux Applets do NOT work in 64-bit
> > > Cinnamon Mint, on day one.
> > 
> > 
> > No idea what you're calling an "applet" in this context, but Applications 
> > work just fine in 64-bit mode.  
> > 
> > > In other words, using 64-bit Linux is a joke since far too many of the
> > > Linux APPs don't work in it.  Furthermore, 64t-bit APPs are not properly
> > > segregated from the 32-bit ONLY APPs in any Linux Desktop distro.
> > 
> > Why segregate them at all?  There's little need to.
> 
> GodHesDumb is an idiot who cannot install proper support for 32bit only apps in his Mint let to compile applications in 64bit mode...
> 
> Dumpster hardware is still 32bit only in Richmond, not in Japan though ;-)
> 
> Moi is aging as fast as the 32bit world...


Takuya Saitoh, as previously exposed by Moi, is a Linux Fraud.  Where is your Linux Distro, Putz?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329433 — Re: Takuya Saitoh, as previously exposed by Moi, is a Linux Fraud. Where is your Linux Distro, Putz?

On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 10:25:19 PM UTC+9, John Gohde wrote:
> On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 1:36:48 AM UTC-4, Takuya Saitoh wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 1:08:11 PM UTC+9, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
> > > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:17:10 -0700, John Gohde wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Moi found out that most of the Linux Applets do NOT work in 64-bit
> > > > Cinnamon Mint, on day one.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > No idea what you're calling an "applet" in this context, but Applications 
> > > work just fine in 64-bit mode.  
> > > 
> > > > In other words, using 64-bit Linux is a joke since far too many of the
> > > > Linux APPs don't work in it.  Furthermore, 64t-bit APPs are not properly
> > > > segregated from the 32-bit ONLY APPs in any Linux Desktop distro.
> > > 
> > > Why segregate them at all?  There's little need to.
> > 
> > GodHesDumb is an idiot who cannot install proper support for 32bit only apps in his Mint let to compile applications in 64bit mode...
> > 
> > Dumpster hardware is still 32bit only in Richmond, not in Japan though ;-)
> > 
> > Moi is aging as fast as the 32bit world...
> 
> 
> Takuya Saitoh, as previously exposed by Moi, is a Linux Fraud.  Where is your Linux Distro, Putz?

Hey Dumbass, you cannot even comprehend how to run 32bit apps in your Mint which is designed for stupid people, how could then yo Moi understand "my Distro"?

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Multilib

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329383 — Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole.

On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 12:08:11 AM UTC-4, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:17:10 -0700, John Gohde wrote:
> 
> > Moi found out that most of the Linux Applets do NOT work in 64-bit
> > Cinnamon Mint, on day one.
> 
> 
> No idea what you're calling an "applet" in this context, but Applications 
> work just fine in 64-bit mode.  


Are you shitting me?

Applets are a feature that clearly makes the Linux Desktop extremely distinctive.  Yet this MORON proudly proclaims that he has absolutely no idea what an Applet is.

I wrote Applet. There is no context dribble require. An Applet is an Applet, Putz! What the fuck do you think that I was talking about?  One too many vaccinations, no doubt.

Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole.  The arrogance of the delusional Linux people is truly astounding.

To repeat, I started out using 64-bit Linux Mint Cinnamon Edition and it wont worth a fuck, IMHO, precisely because as I had previously stated: far too many, if not most, of the Applets simply refused to work.

Ergo, I installed 32-bit Mint and the Applet problem was corrected.

Linux Mint simply did a piss poor job of segregating what worked in 64-bit Linux, vs. what did NOT. ONLY a mentally ill delusional person could possible deny that indisputable fact.

Those trolls on COLA constantly going on about their 64-bit Linux whatever are lying through their teeth, plain and simple.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329407 — Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole.

On 2015-10-29 9:23 AM, John Gohde wrote:
> On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 12:08:11 AM UTC-4, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:17:10 -0700, John Gohde wrote:
>>
>>> Moi found out that most of the Linux Applets do NOT work in 64-bit
>>> Cinnamon Mint, on day one.
>>
>>
>> No idea what you're calling an "applet" in this context, but Applications 
>> work just fine in 64-bit mode.  
> 
> 
> Are you shitting me?
> 
> Applets are a feature that clearly makes the Linux Desktop extremely distinctive.  Yet this MORON proudly proclaims that he has absolutely no idea what an Applet is.
> 
> I wrote Applet. There is no context dribble require. An Applet is an Applet, Putz! What the fuck do you think that I was talking about?  One too many vaccinations, no doubt.
> 
> Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole.  The arrogance of the delusional Linux people is truly astounding.
> 
> To repeat, I started out using 64-bit Linux Mint Cinnamon Edition and it wont worth a fuck, IMHO, precisely because as I had previously stated: far too many, if not most, of the Applets simply refused to work.
> 
> Ergo, I installed 32-bit Mint and the Applet problem was corrected.
> 
> Linux Mint simply did a piss poor job of segregating what worked in 64-bit Linux, vs. what did NOT. ONLY a mentally ill delusional person could possible deny that indisputable fact.
> 
> Those trolls on COLA constantly going on about their 64-bit Linux whatever are lying through their teeth, plain and simple.

Yes... yes... John Gohde. Allow the hate to fill your heart. Join the
dark side... the bitches here are loose.


-- 
Charmed Tuna

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329833 — Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole.

On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:23:40 -0700, John Gohde wrote:

> On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 12:08:11 AM UTC-4, Kelsey Bjarnason
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:17:10 -0700, John Gohde wrote:
>> 
>> > Moi found out that most of the Linux Applets do NOT work in 64-bit
>> > Cinnamon Mint, on day one.
>> 
>> 
>> No idea what you're calling an "applet" in this context, but
>> Applications work just fine in 64-bit mode.
> 
> 
> Are you shitting me?

Yes, except you have the pronouns reversed.


> Applets are a feature that clearly makes the Linux Desktop extremely
> distinctive. 

Every application I use makes my desktop distinctive.  Sometimes I even 
run desktop widgets for the purpose.  The fact you choose to use a term 
such as "applet" which could mean any of a dozen different things doesn't 
show you are communicating meaningfully, it means you're being needlessly 
opaque.  Not surprising.


> Yet this MORON proudly proclaims that he has absolutely no
> idea what an Applet is.

I see you can't read, either.

Tell you what, when you learn to read, go re-read what I actually wrote, 
then try responding to that.

Or are you in fact too brain damaged to actually learn to read?  If so, 
just let me know, because there's no point even trying to communicate in 
a written medium with someone who cannot read.

PS: whomever is reading this stuff to John, perhaps *you* could let us 
know if he's up to the challenge.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329840 — Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole.

On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 4:08:09 PM UTC-4, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:23:40 -0700, John Gohde wrote:
> 
> > On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 12:08:11 AM UTC-4, Kelsey Bjarnason
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:17:10 -0700, John Gohde wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Moi found out that most of the Linux Applets do NOT work in 64-bit
> >> > Cinnamon Mint, on day one.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> No idea what you're calling an "applet" in this context, but
> >> Applications work just fine in 64-bit mode.
> > 
> > 
> > Are you shitting me?
> 
> Yes, except you have the pronouns reversed.
> 
> 
> > Applets are a feature that clearly makes the Linux Desktop extremely
> > distinctive. 
> 
> Every application I use makes my desktop distinctive.  Sometimes I even 
> run desktop widgets for the purpose.  The fact you choose to use a term 
> such as "applet" which could mean any of a dozen different things doesn't 
> show you are communicating meaningfully, it means you're being needlessly 
> opaque.  Not surprising.


What a joke!  Thank you for vindicating my position. :)

First, your long delay before responding clearly marks you as a basket case.

Thanks for confirming your inability to recognize what an Applet is in Linux.  That fact is truly astounding.  Applets, of course, are the most distinguishing feature of the Linux Desktop.

http://cinnamon.linuxmint.com/
How about this, "Applets (which are little apps you can place in the panels)."

Then ...
http://cinnamon-spices.linuxmint.com/applets

Notice, the clear separation of 32-bit ONLY Applets from 64-bit Applets - NOT.

In Linux Mint Cinnamon Edition, at least, their Applets are all jumbled together and NOT properly segregated in the least.

Now, you may return to your coma.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#329863 — Re: Kelsey Bjarnason is just another COLA ass hole.

John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 4:08:09 PM UTC-4, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:23:40 -0700, John Gohde wrote:
>> 
>> > On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 12:08:11 AM UTC-4, Kelsey Bjarnason
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:17:10 -0700, John Gohde wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > Moi found out that most of the Linux Applets do NOT work in 64-bit
>> >> > Cinnamon Mint, on day one.
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> No idea what you're calling an "applet" in this context, but
>> >> Applications work just fine in 64-bit mode.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Are you shitting me?
>> 
>> Yes, except you have the pronouns reversed.
>> 
>> 
>> > Applets are a feature that clearly makes the Linux Desktop extremely
>> > distinctive. 
>> 
>> Every application I use makes my desktop distinctive.  Sometimes I even 
>> run desktop widgets for the purpose.  The fact you choose to use a term 
>> such as "applet" which could mean any of a dozen different things doesn't 
>> show you are communicating meaningfully, it means you're being needlessly 
>> opaque.  Not surprising.
> 
> 
> What a joke!  Thank you for vindicating my position. :)
> 
> First, your long delay before responding clearly marks you as a basket case.
> 
> Thanks for confirming your inability to recognize what an Applet is in Linux.  That fact is truly astounding.  Applets, of course, are the most distinguishing feature of the Linux Desktop.
> 
> http://cinnamon.linuxmint.com/
> How about this, "Applets (which are little apps you can place in the panels)."
> 
> Then ...
> http://cinnamon-spices.linuxmint.com/applets
> 
> Notice, the clear separation of 32-bit ONLY Applets from 64-bit Applets - NOT.
> 
> In Linux Mint Cinnamon Edition, at least, their Applets are all jumbled together and NOT properly segregated in the least.
> 
> Now, you may return to your coma.
> 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EQ6eHeBrhM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web