Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #382077 > unrolled thread

This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017.....

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-24 20:15 -0500
    Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-11-25 01:30 +0000
      Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:40 -0700
    Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-24 21:12 -0500
      Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-24 21:15 -0500
      Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:41 -0700
      Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-11-25 14:04 -0700
        Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-26 09:47 -0500
          Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-26 10:31 -0700
            Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:58 -0800
              Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 10:29 -0800
                Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 10:52 -0800
                  Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 10:59 -0800
                    Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-26 12:04 -0700
                      Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 11:10 -0800
                        Facts about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 13:29 -0800
                          Re: Facts about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 15:12 -0800
                    Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 11:07 -0800
                Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-26 11:32 -0700
                  Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 11:03 -0800
    Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-11-25 08:37 +0100
      Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-25 07:55 -0500
        The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... (was: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017.....) flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-25 09:35 -0500
          Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-25 10:17 -0500
            Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-11-25 16:42 +0100
              Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-11-25 10:44 -0500
                Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-11-25 18:33 +0100
                  Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:47 -0700
                Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:46 -0700
              Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-25 12:21 -0500
              Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:46 -0700
            Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:45 -0700
          Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... (was: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017.....) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:43 -0700
      Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:43 -0700
      Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-11-28 07:19 -0600
        Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-28 09:07 -0700
      Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-11-28 10:32 -0600
        Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-28 09:46 -0700
          Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 09:04 -0800
    Rot in Hell, Maggot! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-11-25 02:11 -0800
      Re: Rot in Hell, Maggot! Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 23:46 -0800
    Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-11-25 06:25 -0500
      Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-11-25 11:42 +0000
        Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-11-25 07:57 -0500
        Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-11-25 16:15 +0000
    Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:40 -0700
    Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-11-25 18:35 -0500
      Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-11-26 00:47 +0000
      Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-11-25 20:01 -0500
        Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-25 17:03 -0800
        Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-11-27 09:13 -0500
          Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-11-27 17:20 +0000
            Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-11-27 15:22 -0500
        Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-11-28 08:03 -0600
      Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 21:48 -0700
    70 known posters are "plonked" ( AutoIgnored ). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-11-25 16:38 -0800
      70 posters are "Dropped" ( AutoIgnored ). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-11-25 17:27 -0800
        "Noisy Kids" are limited to their 5 most recent posts, last 24 hours. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-11-25 17:34 -0800
      Re: 70 known posters are "plonked" ( AutoIgnored ). Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-26 09:53 -0500
      Re: 70 known posters are "plonked" ( AutoIgnored ). DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-11-27 09:53 -0500
        Re: 70 known posters are "plonked" ( AutoIgnored ). Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-11-27 17:21 +0000
        MrDFS's hallucinations. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-11-27 15:10 -0800
          Re: MrDFS's hallucinations. flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-27 18:20 -0500
          Re: MrDFS's hallucinations. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-28 09:23 -0500
          Re: MrDFS's hallucinations. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-12-05 14:56 -0500
            She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-05 19:51 -0800
              Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-12-05 22:55 -0500
                What, exactly, do you think is "weird" about me ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-05 20:39 -0800
                  Re: What, exactly, do you think is "weird" about me ? flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-12-05 23:43 -0500
                    I post whatever's on my mind, obviously. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-05 22:10 -0800
                    Re: What, exactly, do you think is "weird" about me ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-12-06 12:59 -0700
                Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-12-07 08:15 -0500
                  Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-07 07:52 -0600
                    Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-12-07 11:15 -0500
              Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 23:27 -0800
                Re: I attract people like myself: male/macho. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 06:35 -0800
                  Re: I have no desire to hoard money and/or pay off a home loan. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 08:06 -0800
                    Re: She wanted more kids, I didn't. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 11:35 -0800
                      Re: She wanted more kids, I didn't. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 15:58 -0800
                      Re: We went our separate ways. flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-12-06 19:32 -0500
                    Re: She wanted more kids, I didn't. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 15:56 -0800
                      Re: Today's women can't be trusted. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 19:43 -0800
                      Re: Today's women can't be trusted. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 21:42 -0800
              Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 08:57 -0800
              Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-12-08 18:46 -0500
                "My" kids don't miss me at all, not one bit. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-08 18:24 -0800
                  Re: "My" kids don't miss me at all, not one bit. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 19:00 -0800
                    Re: Breeders earn more, I guess. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 20:50 -0800
        Re: 70 known posters are "plonked" ( AutoIgnored ). Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-11-28 06:51 +0000

Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5  Next page →

#382272 — Re: 70 known posters are "plonked" ( AutoIgnored ).

DFS wrote:

> I really believe your Circle of +Trusted should also include Slimer,
> owl,
> GreyCloud, flattie, Melzzzzz, the raging but focused asshole known as
> Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks, Marti van Lin, DeskRabbit, Steve Carroll (non-Snit
> posts), Kohlmann (non-Snit posts), Tattoo Vampire and Sandman.

Thanks, but IIRC I told Relf a decade or so ago that he was a crank of 
the highest order.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#382303 — MrDFS's hallucinations.

You ( MrDFS ) asked me:
> >   http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Cola_Regs.HTM
> 
> Why am I +Trusted?

The "+Trusted" means I read all of your posts.
You're fairly intelligent/provocative,
and I like your computer skills.

You're the reason I put X.CPP's files into 
a .ZIP file, "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP".  Thanks !

But I could sue you for libel ( I'm not a felon ).
And your hallucinations don't end there, oh no,
you think you can control what people do here.

You wrote " quit changing MY Subject line ", for example;
my "Subject:" line is mine, proper, you don't control it.

The "Subject:" line _Should_ reflect the contents of the post.
You should know that by now, 12 years in, but you don't.

> I really believe your Circle of +Trusted should also include Slimer, 

I see him, indirectly, when others quote him;
... and that's enough for me, I don't want more.

> owl, GreyCloud, flattie, Melzzzzz, the raging but focused asshole known 
> as Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks, Marti van Lin, DeskRabbit, Steve Carroll 
> (non-Snit posts), Kohlmann (non-Snit posts), Tattoo Vampire and Sandman.

I'm picky.  Why wast time reading ridiculous stuff ?

Kohlmann has never said anything worth reading, not once.
Most of what he says is completely wrong and cringe worthy;
Maybe he hires programmers, but he sure aint one himself.

Steve Carroll and Snit insult too much, I can't take it.
When I see an insult from Snit, I skip it, marking it read.

When someone insluts, or OverQotes, I quickly skip the post.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#382310 — Re: MrDFS's hallucinations.

On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 15:10:23 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

> You ( MrDFS ) asked me:
>>>   http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Cola_Regs.HTM
>> 
>> Why am I +Trusted?
> 
> The "+Trusted" means I read all of your posts.
> You're fairly intelligent/provocative,
> and I like your computer skills.
> 
> You're the reason I put X.CPP's files into 
> a .ZIP file, "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP".  Thanks !
> 
> But I could sue you for libel ( I'm not a felon ).
> And your hallucinations don't end there, oh no,
> you think you can control what people do here.
> 
> You wrote " quit changing MY Subject line ", for example;
> my "Subject:" line is mine, proper, you don't control it.
> 
> The "Subject:" line _Should_ reflect the contents of the post.
> You should know that by now, 12 years in, but you don't.
> 
>> I really believe your Circle of +Trusted should also include Slimer, 
> 
> I see him, indirectly, when others quote him;
> ... and that's enough for me, I don't want more.
> 
>> owl, GreyCloud, flattie, Melzzzzz, the raging but focused asshole known 
>> as Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks, Marti van Lin, DeskRabbit, Steve Carroll 
>> (non-Snit posts), Kohlmann (non-Snit posts), Tattoo Vampire and Sandman.
> 
> I'm picky.  Why wast time reading ridiculous stuff ?
> 
> Kohlmann has never said anything worth reading, not once.
> Most of what he says is completely wrong and cringe worthy;
> Maybe he hires programmers, but he sure aint one himself.
> 
> Steve Carroll and Snit insult too much, I can't take it.
> When I see an insult from Snit, I skip it, marking it read.
> 
> When someone insluts, or OverQotes, I quickly skip the post.

Why are you so weird?
Permanently high on some illicit substance?


-- 
flatfish+++
mariana trench

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#382382 — Re: MrDFS's hallucinations.

On 2016-11-27 6:10 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> You ( MrDFS ) asked me:
>>>   http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Cola_Regs.HTM
>>
>> Why am I +Trusted?
> 
> The "+Trusted" means I read all of your posts.
> You're fairly intelligent/provocative,
> and I like your computer skills.
> 
> You're the reason I put X.CPP's files into 
> a .ZIP file, "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP".  Thanks !
> 
> But I could sue you for libel ( I'm not a felon ).
> And your hallucinations don't end there, oh no,
> you think you can control what people do here.
> 
> You wrote " quit changing MY Subject line ", for example;
> my "Subject:" line is mine, proper, you don't control it.
> 
> The "Subject:" line _Should_ reflect the contents of the post.
> You should know that by now, 12 years in, but you don't.
> 
>> I really believe your Circle of +Trusted should also include Slimer, 
> 
> I see him, indirectly, when others quote him;
> ... and that's enough for me, I don't want more.

Ha! You've taken the position most women of the world have.

< snip >

> Kohlmann has never said anything worth reading, not once.
> Most of what he says is completely wrong and cringe worthy;
> Maybe he hires programmers, but he sure aint one himself.

Ha! I'm looking forward to reading Peter's rebuttal of this.

> Steve Carroll and Snit insult too much, I can't take it.
> When I see an insult from Snit, I skip it, marking it read.
> 
> When someone insluts, or OverQotes, I quickly skip the post.

Lazy guy.

-- 
Silver Slimer
Fingerprint: e58428b2633833a3b0c9bb7e40819166642245b7
Gab.ai: @silverslimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#382932 — Re: MrDFS's hallucinations.

On 11/27/2016 06:10 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> You ( MrDFS ) asked me:
>>> http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Cola_Regs.HTM
>>
>> Why am I +Trusted?
>
> The "+Trusted" means I read all of your posts. You're fairly
> intelligent/provocative, and I like your computer skills.

They'd be a lot better if I used all cola-posting time to learn.


> You're the reason I put X.CPP's files into a .ZIP file,
> "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP".  Thanks !

I think I told you I got your X.EXE to run.  Funky stuff.  Do you spend
all day in it?


> But I could sue you for libel ( I'm not a felon ).


Before you waste your time and money:

* you'll have a heck of a time proving I knew you weren't a felon (I
   figured you were, given your past posts about child support and
   not seeing your children).

* you'll have a heck of a time proving your reputation was harmed by my
   statement.  Your wacky posts thru the years make you sound like a
   derelict.

Both are required to prove defamation.




> And your hallucinations don't end there, oh no, you think you can
> control what people do here.
>
> You wrote " quit changing MY Subject line ", for example; my
> "Subject:" line is mine, proper, you don't control it.
>
> The "Subject:" line _Should_ reflect the contents of the post. You
> should know that by now, 12 years in, but you don't.

The Subject line is created by the OP, and should never be changed.



>> I really believe your Circle of +Trusted should also include
>> Slimer,
>
> I see him, indirectly, when others quote him; ... and that's enough
> for me, I don't want more.
>
>> owl, GreyCloud, flattie, Melzzzzz, the raging but focused asshole
>> known as Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks, Marti van Lin, DeskRabbit, Steve
>> Carroll (non-Snit posts), Kohlmann (non-Snit posts), Tattoo Vampire
>> and Sandman.
>
> I'm picky.  Why wast time reading ridiculous stuff ?

'cause life is ridiculous?



> Kohlmann has never said anything worth reading, not once.
> Most of what he says is completely wrong and cringe worthy; Maybe he
> hires programmers, but he sure aint one himself.

I'm sure he is, even though he's afraid to post code.



> Steve Carroll and Snit insult too much, I can't take it. When I see
> an insult from Snit, I skip it, marking it read.
>
> When someone insluts, or OverQotes, I quickly skip the post.


What if the insult is the last word in the last line, felon?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#382975 — She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy.

The primary difference between you ( Mr. DFS ) and me is:

  I know that I'm ignored 99% of the time;
  and the other 1% is _random_ insults from men,
  and/or _random_ praise from women.

You replied ( to me ):
> > You're the reason I put X.CPP's files into a .ZIP file,
> > "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP".  Thanks !
> 
> I think I told you I got your X.EXE to run.  Funky stuff.
> Do you spend all day in it?

It's autoLoaded upon booting;
it's always the first app on my TaskBar;
I often have two copies running.

I add to the code ( X.CPP ) from time to time.
One of the lesser changes I made 9 days ago:

  http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Diff.PNG
  [ Red is the old code, Green is the new stuff ]

> > But I could sue you for libel ( I'm not a felon ).
> 
> You'll have a heck of a time proving I knew you weren't a felon 
> ( I figured you were, given your past posts about child support
>   and not seeing your children ).

No felony.  My ex divorced me to marry her lover.
She cried when I told her I'd stop paying Child Support;
I cried when I lost "my" kids.  That was that, thee end.

She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy.
I like it this way, alone; I don't trust women.

> You'll have a heck of a time proving your reputation was harmed by my statement.
> Your wacky posts thru the years make you sound like a derelict.

A "derelict" is not a felon; _and_ I'm not a derelict.
Likely, you are; otherwise, you wouldn't be so worried about it.
I'm a professional coder _and_ I manage a 32 unit rooming house.

> > The "Subject:" line _Should_ reflect the contents of the post.
> > You should know that by now, 12 years in, but you don't.
> 
> The Subject line is created by the OP, and should never be changed.

You don't understand Usenet, obviously.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#382977 — Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy.

On Mon, 05 Dec 2016 19:51:49 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

> The primary difference between you ( Mr. DFS ) and me is:
> 
>   I know that I'm ignored 99% of the time;

You seem like a nice guy Jeff but honestly you seem to be so freaking
weird.
What gives?

-- 
flatfish+++
mariana trench

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#382980 — What, exactly, do you think is "weird" about me ?

You ( flatfish ) replied ( to me ):
> > The primary difference between you ( Mr. DFS ) and me is:
> > 
> >   I know that I'm ignored 99% of the time;
> 
> You seem like a nice guy Jeff but honestly 
> you seem to be so freaking weird.  What gives?

I don't understand the question.
What, exactly, do you think is "weird" about me ?

Certainly, Hopefully, not everyone here is the same.
You can drop my posts, of course.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#382981 — Re: What, exactly, do you think is "weird" about me ?

On Mon, 05 Dec 2016 20:39:05 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

> You ( flatfish ) replied ( to me ):
>>> The primary difference between you ( Mr. DFS ) and me is:
>>> 
>>>   I know that I'm ignored 99% of the time;
>> 
>> You seem like a nice guy Jeff but honestly 
>> you seem to be so freaking weird.  What gives?
> 
> I don't understand the question.
> What, exactly, do you think is "weird" about me ?
> 
> Certainly, Hopefully, not everyone here is the same.
> You can drop my posts, of course.

You post all this obtuse stuff.
Bedbugs?
Really weird stuff.

Like I said you seem like a straight up guy but just waaaaay out
there.....
Like Pluto...

-- 
flatfish+++
mariana trench

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#382983 — I post whatever's on my mind, obviously.

You ( flatfish ) replied ( to me ):
> > What, exactly, do you think is "weird" about me ?
> > You can drop my posts, of course.
> 
> You post all this obtuse stuff.
> Bedbugs?  Really weird stuff.

I post whatever's on my mind, obviously.
I manage a 32 unit rooming house;
lots of people coming and going, from all over the globe.

So I've delt with it; also, I saw a (bad) Youtube video on it.
The video said the Mattress/BoxSpring encasements had to be plastic;
not true, 100% polyester is best.  etc. etc.

> Like I said, you seem like a straight up guy 
> but waaaaay out there..... Like Pluto...

Then drop my posts, if you don't want "News from Pluto".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#383018 — Re: What, exactly, do you think is "weird" about me ?

On 12/5/16, 9:43 PM, in article eamtvrF4t5dU1@mid.individual.net,
"flatfish+++" <flatfish@linuxmail.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 05 Dec 2016 20:39:05 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> 
>> You ( flatfish ) replied ( to me ):
>>>> The primary difference between you ( Mr. DFS ) and me is:
>>>> 
>>>>   I know that I'm ignored 99% of the time;
>>> 
>>> You seem like a nice guy Jeff but honestly
>>> you seem to be so freaking weird.  What gives?
>> 
>> I don't understand the question.
>> What, exactly, do you think is "weird" about me ?
>> 
>> Certainly, Hopefully, not everyone here is the same.
>> You can drop my posts, of course.
> 
> You post all this obtuse stuff.
> Bedbugs?
> Really weird stuff.
> 
> Like I said you seem like a straight up guy but just waaaaay out
> there.....
> Like Pluto...

Pluto is a "straight up guy"? :)


-- 
"When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them. The
foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them
as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God." --
Leviticus 19:33-34

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#383111 — Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy.

flatfish+++ wrote:

> You seem like a nice guy Jeff but honestly you seem to be so freaking
> weird.
> What gives?

He's just fucking weird. I binned him over a decade ago but even back then 
he was a whackjob.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#383115 — Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy.

Tattoo Vampire wrote:

> troll wrote:
>>
>>  you seem to be so freaking weird.
>> What gives?

How ironic, from some loon who has been posting the same idiocy and
lies, in here, for almost two decades.

"Linux is free but M$ has retained their dominance of the desktop.
Linux must suck." repeated literally *thousands* of times.

>He's just fucking weird. I binned him over a decade ago but even back then 
>he was a whackjob.

It's "hard" to believe a women not pursuing Relf, eh?  What a "catch"!

  :-D

-- 
'So complete freedom is doesn't actually matter - as long as you think
there are "enough freedoms."  I'm sure that the former Soviet Union
gave their citizens "enough freedoms" as well.'  -  trolling fsckwit
"Ezekiel", attacking the GPL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#383123 — Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy.

On 12/7/2016 8:52 AM, shitv wrote:


> It's "hard" to believe a women not pursuing Relf, eh?  What a "catch"!
>
>   :-D


"a women"?  Good one, Mr. Intellectually Superior.

Hey, you apparently suckered a woman into marrying you, shit-for-brains, 
so look in the mirror and :-D at yourself.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#382985 — Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy.

On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 12:51:50 PM UTC+9, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> The primary difference between you ( Mr. DFS ) and me is:
> 
>   I know that I'm ignored 99% of the time;
>   and the other 1% is _random_ insults from men,
>   and/or _random_ praise from women.
> 
> You replied ( to me ):
> > > You're the reason I put X.CPP's files into a .ZIP file,
> > > "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP".  Thanks !
> > 
> > I think I told you I got your X.EXE to run.  Funky stuff.
> > Do you spend all day in it?
> 
> It's autoLoaded upon booting;
> it's always the first app on my TaskBar;
> I often have two copies running.
> 
> I add to the code ( X.CPP ) from time to time.
> One of the lesser changes I made 9 days ago:
> 
>   http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Diff.PNG
>   [ Red is the old code, Green is the new stuff ]
> 
> > > But I could sue you for libel ( I'm not a felon ).
> > 
> > You'll have a heck of a time proving I knew you weren't a felon 
> > ( I figured you were, given your past posts about child support
> >   and not seeing your children ).
> 
> No felony.  My ex divorced me to marry her lover.

Well, yo chemistries had not been compatible then...

> She cried when I told her I'd stop paying Child Support;
> I cried when I lost "my" kids.  That was that, thee end.
>
> She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy.
> I like it this way, alone; I don't trust women.

Is that why yo cut the vasa and take predominantly male tenants?  How many kids have yo made total, Jeff?

> > You'll have a heck of a time proving your reputation was harmed by my statement.
> > Your wacky posts thru the years make you sound like a derelict.
> 
> A "derelict" is not a felon; _and_ I'm not a derelict.
> Likely, you are; otherwise, you wouldn't be so worried about it.
> I'm a professional coder _and_ I manage a 32 unit rooming house.

So it's not your house/property, right?

> > > The "Subject:" line _Should_ reflect the contents of the post.
> > > You should know that by now, 12 years in, but you don't.
> > 
> > The Subject line is created by the OP, and should never be changed.
> 
> You don't understand Usenet, obviously.

Usenet is one of yo hobbies, apparently, and yo good at it with all that fancy embedding/coding - I like it.  My guess is women are attracted to you but yo may not be completely straight guy....  Do yo have dreams?  Their contents should tell the truth from subconscious mind.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#382995 — Re: I attract people like myself: male/macho.

On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 5:22:37 PM UTC+9, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> You ( Takuya Saitoh ) replied ( to me ):
> > > My ex divorced me to marry her lover.
> > 
> > Well, yo chemistries had not been compatible then...
> 
> She had to have 6 kids; I was done after two.
> She was like: " Fine, I'll get it elsewhere ";
> and she did, six.

The evolutionary programming is so powerful especially in women.  They just go straight after money and breeding...  The strategy is to crossbreed with as many different guys as possible to maximize the evolutionary diversity and ensure at least some of their progeny survives the future cataclysmic events.  But they stupid lacking the Y-chromosome which we men posses that gives us intellectual advantage meaning having extra data/programs in our cellular ROM.  Are her other kids black, i.e. made from dindu/immigrant/mohammad sperm?

> > My guess is women are attracted to you 
> > but yo may not be completely straight guy....  
> > Do yo have dreams?  Their contents should tell 
> > the truth from subconscious mind.
> 
> I attracted to young, fit, nude women, not men;

Well it's like a virus, we programmed to seek young, fit nude women like Jeri Ryan.  After the puberty, most resources/energy is used to run the breeding program, not for the maintenance of our own bodies.  Therefore we age and get degenerative diseases...  The only period in our lives when we have superior organ maintenance, immunity, don't age and don't waste time and energy on neverending search for mates is during the elementary school years before the steroid hormones like testosterone and estrogen kick in and change us forever.  The only thing which can only partially counteract and slow down this self-destructive process is melatonin.  IMO yo get lot of melatonin while living in dark and using black background on PC monitor...

> but I know better than to act on it, of course;
> I don't trust them.
> to rest 
> > > She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy.
> > > I like it this way, alone; I don't trust women.
> > 
> > Is that why yo cut the vasa and take predominantly male tenants?
> > How many kids have yo made total, Jeff?
> 
> Two kids, a boy and a girl, 1983, 1984.
> Yes, that's why I got a vasectomy.

Wow, that must have been a hell of a breeding queen. 1 kid every year!  Are yo sure they both yours?  Normally, the body needs 2-3 years in between to replenish the minerals and nutrients for growing the next baby...
 
> I have six female tenants, in six units.
> 12 men in their twenties, in 12 units.
> 14 older men, including me, in 14 units.
> 
> Basically, I attract people like myself: male/macho.

Are yo macho, Jeff?  Do yo exercise, lifting weights?

> > > I'm a professional coder _and_ I manage a 32 unit rooming house.
> > 
> > So it's not your house/property, right?
> 
> Yes, I'm just the manager, not the owner.
> Men with wives and kids are owners; 
> that's not me, not at all, I don't want that.

Do yo plan on buying some house like John Gohde for retirement?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#383003 — Re: I have no desire to hoard money and/or pay off a home loan.

On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 12:35:04 AM UTC+9, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> You ( Takuya Saitoh ) asked me:
> > Are her other kids black, 
> > i.e. made from dindu/immigrant/mohammad sperm?
> 
> No, they are very white.
> She married a nice guy, they have plenty of money.
> 
> > > Men with wives and kids are home owners; 
> > > that's not me, not at all, I don't want that.
> > 
> > Do yo plan on buying some house like John Gohde for retirement?
> 
> No.
> I have no desire to hoard money and/or pay off a home loan.
> 
> > > I attract people like myself: male/macho.
> > 
> > Are yo macho, Jeff?  Do yo exercise, lifting weights?
> 
> No, I don't lift weights;
> still, I'm the _opposite_ of a cute little girl.
> I weigh 220 lbs and I'm quite active.
> 
> > > Two kids, a boy and a girl, 1983, 1984.
> > 
> > Wow, that must have been a hell of a breeding queen.
> > 1 kid every year!  Are yo sure they both yours?
> 
> Yes, they're mine.  1988, 4 years after our last kid,
> we were having sex 8 times a week.

She must have been a nymphomaniac, infected with the dopamine parasite Toxoplasma, or was it you, Jeff?  Anyway, it was good for yo prostate and her psychology when it lasted....  Yet she choose the money, basic instinct to ensure the survival of her progeny...

> > The only thing which can only partially counteract 
> > and slow down this self-destructive process is melatonin.
> > IMO yo get lot of melatonin while living in dark 
> > and using black background on PC monitor...
> 
> I'm not worried about it.
> Some live fast, die fast; others live slow, die slow.
> Often, it's not even a choice, one is _born_ into it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#383015 — Re: She wanted more kids, I didn't.

On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 9:18:37 AM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> You ( Takuya Saitoh ) replied ( to me ):
> > > Yes, they're mine.  1988, 4 years after our last kid,
> > > we were having sex 8 times a week.
> > 
> > She must have been a nymphomaniac, infected with 
> > the dopamine parasite Toxoplasma, or was it you, Jeff?  
> 
> Both of us; it takes two, right ?

LOL! Of course, and when you're young that's a fairly normal appetite.

> > Anyway, it was good for yo prostate 
> > and her psychology when it lasted....
> > 
> > Yet she choose the money, basic instinct 
> > to ensure the survival of her progeny...
> 
> She wanted more kids, I didn't;

There only question after that happened is:

Did you make them regret it? 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#383029 — Re: She wanted more kids, I didn't.

On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 4:35:26 AM UTC+9, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 9:18:37 AM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> > You ( Takuya Saitoh ) replied ( to me ):
> > > > Yes, they're mine.  1988, 4 years after our last kid,
> > > > we were having sex 8 times a week.
> > > 
> > > She must have been a nymphomaniac, infected with 
> > > the dopamine parasite Toxoplasma, or was it you, Jeff?  
> > 
> > Both of us; it takes two, right ?
> 
> LOL! Of course, and when you're young that's a fairly normal appetite.

not in Japan though... too much arachidonic acid and carbs fertilizers in the US

> > > Anyway, it was good for yo prostate 
> > > and her psychology when it lasted....
> > > 
> > > Yet she choose the money, basic instinct 
> > > to ensure the survival of her progeny...
> > 
> > She wanted more kids, I didn't;
> 
> There only question after that happened is:
> 
> Did you make them regret it?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#383030 — Re: We went our separate ways.

On Tue, 06 Dec 2016 15:16:39 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

> ou ( Steve Carroll ) replied ( to me ):
>>> She wanted more kids, I didn't;
>> 
>> There only question after that happened is:
>> 
>>   Did you make them regret it? 
> No, we went our separate ways.
> We both got the lives we wanted.

That's the best thing to do for both of you.

-- 
flatfish+++
mariana trench

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web