Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #382975
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics |
| Subject | She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. |
| Date | 2016-12-05 19:51 -0800 |
| Organization | Glorb Internet Services, http://www.glorb.com |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Dec.5--7.51P.Seattle.2016> (permalink) |
| References | <e9phmcF348lU1@mid.individual.net> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.25--4.38P.Seattle.2016> <o1ervp$pvh$6@dont-email.me> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.27--3.10P.Seattle.2016> <o24gnp$h4p$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
The primary difference between you ( Mr. DFS ) and me is: I know that I'm ignored 99% of the time; and the other 1% is _random_ insults from men, and/or _random_ praise from women. You replied ( to me ): > > You're the reason I put X.CPP's files into a .ZIP file, > > "Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP". Thanks ! > > I think I told you I got your X.EXE to run. Funky stuff. > Do you spend all day in it? It's autoLoaded upon booting; it's always the first app on my TaskBar; I often have two copies running. I add to the code ( X.CPP ) from time to time. One of the lesser changes I made 9 days ago: http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Diff.PNG [ Red is the old code, Green is the new stuff ] > > But I could sue you for libel ( I'm not a felon ). > > You'll have a heck of a time proving I knew you weren't a felon > ( I figured you were, given your past posts about child support > and not seeing your children ). No felony. My ex divorced me to marry her lover. She cried when I told her I'd stop paying Child Support; I cried when I lost "my" kids. That was that, thee end. She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. I like it this way, alone; I don't trust women. > You'll have a heck of a time proving your reputation was harmed by my statement. > Your wacky posts thru the years make you sound like a derelict. A "derelict" is not a felon; _and_ I'm not a derelict. Likely, you are; otherwise, you wouldn't be so worried about it. I'm a professional coder _and_ I manage a 32 unit rooming house. > > The "Subject:" line _Should_ reflect the contents of the post. > > You should know that by now, 12 years in, but you don't. > > The Subject line is created by the OP, and should never be changed. You don't understand Usenet, obviously.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-24 20:15 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-11-25 01:30 +0000
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:40 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-24 21:12 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-24 21:15 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:41 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-11-25 14:04 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-26 09:47 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-26 10:31 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:58 -0800
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 10:29 -0800
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 10:52 -0800
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 10:59 -0800
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-26 12:04 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 11:10 -0800
Facts about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 13:29 -0800
Re: Facts about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 15:12 -0800
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 11:07 -0800
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-26 11:32 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 11:03 -0800
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-11-25 08:37 +0100
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-25 07:55 -0500
The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... (was: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017.....) flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-25 09:35 -0500
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-25 10:17 -0500
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-11-25 16:42 +0100
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-11-25 10:44 -0500
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-11-25 18:33 +0100
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:47 -0700
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:46 -0700
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-25 12:21 -0500
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:46 -0700
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:45 -0700
Re: The Experiment Has Been A Success ! Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... (was: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017.....) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:43 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:43 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-11-28 07:19 -0600
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-28 09:07 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-11-28 10:32 -0600
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-28 09:46 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 09:04 -0800
Rot in Hell, Maggot! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-11-25 02:11 -0800
Re: Rot in Hell, Maggot! Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 23:46 -0800
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-11-25 06:25 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-11-25 11:42 +0000
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-11-25 07:57 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-11-25 16:15 +0000
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 10:40 -0700
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-11-25 18:35 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-11-26 00:47 +0000
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-11-25 20:01 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-25 17:03 -0800
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-11-27 09:13 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-11-27 17:20 +0000
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-11-27 15:22 -0500
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-11-28 08:03 -0600
Re: This Group Is Dead.. A Proposal for 2017..... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-25 21:48 -0700
70 known posters are "plonked" ( AutoIgnored ). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-11-25 16:38 -0800
70 posters are "Dropped" ( AutoIgnored ). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-11-25 17:27 -0800
"Noisy Kids" are limited to their 5 most recent posts, last 24 hours. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-11-25 17:34 -0800
Re: 70 known posters are "plonked" ( AutoIgnored ). Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-26 09:53 -0500
Re: 70 known posters are "plonked" ( AutoIgnored ). DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-11-27 09:53 -0500
Re: 70 known posters are "plonked" ( AutoIgnored ). Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-11-27 17:21 +0000
MrDFS's hallucinations. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-11-27 15:10 -0800
Re: MrDFS's hallucinations. flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-27 18:20 -0500
Re: MrDFS's hallucinations. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-28 09:23 -0500
Re: MrDFS's hallucinations. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-12-05 14:56 -0500
She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-05 19:51 -0800
Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-12-05 22:55 -0500
What, exactly, do you think is "weird" about me ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-05 20:39 -0800
Re: What, exactly, do you think is "weird" about me ? flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-12-05 23:43 -0500
I post whatever's on my mind, obviously. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-05 22:10 -0800
Re: What, exactly, do you think is "weird" about me ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-12-06 12:59 -0700
Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-12-07 08:15 -0500
Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-07 07:52 -0600
Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-12-07 11:15 -0500
Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 23:27 -0800
Re: I attract people like myself: male/macho. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 06:35 -0800
Re: I have no desire to hoard money and/or pay off a home loan. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 08:06 -0800
Re: She wanted more kids, I didn't. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 11:35 -0800
Re: She wanted more kids, I didn't. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 15:58 -0800
Re: We went our separate ways. flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-12-06 19:32 -0500
Re: She wanted more kids, I didn't. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 15:56 -0800
Re: Today's women can't be trusted. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 19:43 -0800
Re: Today's women can't be trusted. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 21:42 -0800
Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 08:57 -0800
Re: She didn't pursue me, I didn't pursue her; we're happy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-12-08 18:46 -0500
"My" kids don't miss me at all, not one bit. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-08 18:24 -0800
Re: "My" kids don't miss me at all, not one bit. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 19:00 -0800
Re: Breeders earn more, I guess. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 20:50 -0800
Re: 70 known posters are "plonked" ( AutoIgnored ). Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-11-28 06:51 +0000
csiph-web