Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #330005 > unrolled thread

Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 18:48 -0500
    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 02:45 +0000
      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-11-01 03:10 -0600
        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 04:17 +0000
          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 21:34 -0700
          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 10:45 -0600
            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 21:47 +0000
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 16:16 -0600
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 00:53 +0000
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 19:48 -0600
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:27 +0000
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-03 08:52 +0100
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-03 08:50 +0000
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 15:37 +0000
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 17:55 +0000
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 19:27 +0000
                            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:05 -0500
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 15:46 -0700
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-03 13:37 -0600
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:04 -0500
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:06 -0500
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 09:09 -0500
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:25 +0000
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-03 00:34 +0100
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 01:09 +0000
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 01:41 +0000
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 20:54 -0500
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 21:51 -0500
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:07 +0000
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:24 +0000
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:38 +0000
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 21:49 -0500
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 08:46 -0500
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 10:16 -0800
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 20:51 -0500
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 19:49 -0600
    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 10:44 -0600
      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 21:39 +0000
        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 14:49 -0700
        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 16:13 -0600
          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 01:07 +0000
            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 19:52 -0600
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:27 +0000
            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-03 07:37 +0000
              @ronb is fucked in the head, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-03 03:14 -0800
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-03 13:27 -0600
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:23 +0000
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 09:58 -0500
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 14:16 -0600
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 22:33 +0000
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 19:31 -0600
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:40 +0000
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-05 17:53 -0500
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:21 +0000
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 09:54 -0500
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 09:56 -0500
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 07:16 -0800
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 14:14 -0600
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 22:36 +0000
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 19:32 -0600
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:50 +0000
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-06 10:04 -0600
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-04 22:24 +0000
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 22:31 +0000
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-05 00:24 +0000
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 19:29 -0500
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 19:47 -0500
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:45 +0000
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 15:02 -0800
        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 17:52 -0500
          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 19:39 -0500
            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 19:58 -0500
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 20:46 -0500
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 21:51 -0500
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 08:39 -0500
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 17:59 +0000
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 19:32 +0000
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:06 -0500
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 13:39 -0500
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 14:49 -0500
          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 15:53 -0700
            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 19:28 -0700
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 09:35 -0500
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 09:44 -0500
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 07:02 -0800
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 10:50 -0500
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 08:06 -0800
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 12:09 -0500
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 12:34 -0500
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 10:15 -0800
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-04 09:40 -0800
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 12:44 -0500
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 13:38 -0500
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-04 09:19 -0700
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-04 16:40 -0700
        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere "vallor" <vallor@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 23:57 +0100
          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-02 18:15 -0500
          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 00:48 +0000
            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-03 07:16 +0000
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-03 06:26 -0500
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:25 +0000
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:24 +0000
          Women need choices, not enslavement. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-02 17:39 -0800
            Re: Women need choices, not enslavement. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 08:56 -0500
          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-03 07:14 +0000
            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-03 06:45 -0600
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:07 +0000
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere "JEDIDIAH" <nomad@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-04 06:47 +0100
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-04 06:45 -0600
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 15:01 +0000
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 06:42 -0800
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 15:00 +0000
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-04 10:11 -0500
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 22:29 +0000
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-04 18:55 -0500
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:46 +0000
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 07:42 -0800
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 14:19 -0600
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 15:35 -0500
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 22:34 +0000
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-05 00:26 +0100
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:35 +0000
                            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-05 17:53 -0500
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 19:34 -0600
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:51 +0000
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-05 07:17 -0600
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-05 09:23 -0500
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-04 22:45 +0000
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 19:37 -0600
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 21:25 -0500
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-05 12:58 -0700
                            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-05 17:39 -0500
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:38 +0000
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:37 +0000
                        Evolution and the RC church vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-06 00:23 +0000
                          Re: Evolution and the RC church vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-06 00:30 +0000
                            Re: Evolution and the RC church Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-05 19:47 -0500
                          Re: Evolution and the RC church ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 04:15 +0000
                            Re: Evolution and the RC church vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-06 04:36 +0000
                              Re: Evolution and the RC church Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-06 06:04 -0500
                                Re: Evolution and the RC church chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-06 07:05 -0600
                                  Re: Evolution and the RC church Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-06 08:14 -0500
                                    Re: Evolution and the RC church Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-06 10:57 -0500
                                      Re: Evolution and the RC church Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-06 11:06 -0500
                              Re: Evolution and the RC church ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 01:16 +0000
                            Re: Evolution and the RC church GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-06 16:14 -0700
                              Re: Evolution and the RC church Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 16:47 -0700
                                Re: Evolution and the RC church Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 15:53 -0800
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-06 01:34 +0000
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-05 20:37 -0500
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-06 09:13 +0100
                            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-06 09:39 -0600
                            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:19 -0700
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-06 06:02 -0500
            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:06 +0000

Page 6 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8  Next page →

#330796

On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 06:26:49 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> vallor wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:48:59 +0000, ronb wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 23:57:13 +0100, fake vallor wrote:
>>> 
>>>  <snip>
>>>
>>> I see anti-religious crankdom has made you a kind and gentle person.
>>> Now your lecture to me was about ... what?
>>
>> That was the dizum coward that forged me.
> 
> It was obvious, dunno why it didn't fire up ronb's spider-sense.

I was responding to what the forger said -- not who he was. In fairness, 
however, I should have mentioned it. 

-- 
Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330795

On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 07:16:25 +0000, vallor wrote:

> On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:48:59 +0000, ronb wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 23:57:13 +0100, vallor wrote:
>> 
>>> "ronb" <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> cried in message
>>> news:n18l7d$cl1$7@dont-email.me...
>>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 10:44:38 -0600, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> It's "batshit crazy" to defend life? Strangely enough, if a murderer
>>>> kills a pregnant woman, he's guilty of two murders. But when the
>>>> mother and an abortionist kills the baby, it's perfectly fine and
>>>> acceptable.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> Your momma should have gotten an abortion after she finished screwing
>>> that mangy dog that got her pregnant with you.
>>> 
>>> This way morons like you who are blinded by religion and don't believe
>>> in science wouldn't be ruining it for the rest of us.
>> 
>> I see anti-religious crankdom has made you a kind and gentle person.
>> Now your lecture to me was about ... what?
> 
> That was the dizum coward that forged me.

Sorry. I noticing the lack of bullshit bulls, but I failed to mention 
noticing it. I won't respond to forger in the future.

-- 
Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330558 — Women need choices, not enslavement.

Abortion benefits society, I'm sure.

Women need choices, not enslavement.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330636 — Re: Women need choices, not enslavement.

On 2015-11-02 10:30 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 11/2/15, 6:39 PM, in article Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.2{5.39P.Seattle.2015},
> "Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.> wrote:
> 
>> Abortion benefits society, I'm sure.
>>
>> Women need choices, not enslavement.
> 
> Those that oppose choice and say it is because they think the fetus has a
> right that SUPERCEDES that of a women are saying women have fewer rights
> than a fetus. It is insane. We allot more rights onto dead bodies than they
> want to grant women.

A child growing inside of a woman is not a dead body. That's pretty
disgusting of you to say. What conservatives are saying is that the
child has a right to be protected and not discarded the way a used
condom is. Also, conservatives want to discourage the use of abortion as
a contraceptive which seems to be happening more frequently because
sexually-active people are becoming increasingly stupid. Doing so
dehumanizes us completely and we're already immoral enough as it is.

> Of course, most of these people have an exception for rape and incest, where
> they rights of the fetus are the EXACT same. This shows it is really more
> about trying to control women.

It is trying to control the immorality of today's society, not the
women. If you don't want children, use a condom or go on the pill. If
you couldn't do that, live with the consequences. I don't see why the
immaturity of these men and women has to be excused with abortions. In
fact, had I gotten a woman pregnant at 20 to 26 (when I was mostly
single), I would have done the honourable thing and been happy to be a
father. I don't see why these irresponsible twats would be any different.

> And if we did not have a conservative media they would speak honestly about
> this instead of accepting the right wing view.

Your opinion is not equal to honesty. You see yourself as some sort of
intensely moral individual who is infallible but that is grossly inaccurate.

-- 
Charmed Tuna

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330601

On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 23:57:13 +0100, vallor wrote:

> "ronb" <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> cried in message
> news:n18l7d$cl1$7@dont-email.me...
>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 10:44:38 -0600, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> It's "batshit crazy" to defend life? Strangely enough, if a murderer
>> kills a pregnant woman, he's guilty of two murders. But when the mother
>> and an abortionist kills the baby, it's perfectly fine and acceptable.
>> 
>> 
> Your momma should have gotten an abortion after she finished screwing
> that mangy dog that got her pregnant with you.
> 
> This way morons like you who are blinded by religion and don't believe
> in science wouldn't be ruining it for the rest of us.

Dizum coward forgery.

-- 
 -v
Kernel:4.1.5-sd  Desktop:Xfce 4.12.2  Distro:Linux Mint 17.2 Rafaela

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330619

vallor wrote:

> some idiot forging vallor wrote:
>> 
>> Your momma should have gotten an abortion after she finished screwing
>> that mangy dog that got her pregnant with you.
>> 
>> This way morons like you who are blinded by religion and don't believe
>> in science wouldn't be ruining it for the rest of us.
>
> Dizum coward forgery.

A Linux-hater who is a forging scumbag?  Who would have guessed?

-- 
"If you wish to contribute feel free: Telling lies, nymshifting and
telling more lies is rather lame don't you think?"  -  liar and
nymshifter "Hadron"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330792

On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 06:45:56 -0600, chrisv wrote:

> vallor wrote:
> 
>> some idiot forging vallor wrote:
>>> 
>>> Your momma should have gotten an abortion after she finished screwing
>>> that mangy dog that got her pregnant with you.
>>> 
>>> This way morons like you who are blinded by religion and don't believe
>>> in science wouldn't be ruining it for the rest of us.
>>
>> Dizum coward forgery.
> 
> A Linux-hater who is a forging scumbag?  Who would have guessed?

Yeah, will wonders never cease.

-- 
Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330803

"ronb" <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> scribed news:n1c09n$d8b$5@dont-email.me...
> On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 06:45:56 -0600, chrisv wrote:
> 
>> vallor wrote:


[deletia]


>>> Dizum coward forgery.
>> 
>> A Linux-hater who is a forging scumbag?  Who would have guessed?
> 
> Yeah, will wonders never cease.
> 

Perhaps it's not a wonder after all. Sounds more like one of those fairy tale miracles Christians are so gullible for.

Why deal with scientific explanations when you can just wave your hands and proclaim a miracle.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330811

some idiot forging JEDIDIAH wrote:

>

Ignore the forger.

-- 
"I almost never insult someone unless I'm insulted first."  -
DumFSck, lying shamelessly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330836

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 06:45:14 -0600, chrisv wrote:

> some idiot forging JEDIDIAH wrote:
> 
> 
>>
> Ignore the forger.

Missed this. Sorry. 

-- 
Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330822

On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 10:56:26 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 11/3/15, 10:47 PM, in article ffeb069c600c44d471ef4e43b2935bb3@dizum.com,
> "JEDIDIAH" <nomad@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > "ronb" <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> scribed news:n1c09n$d8b$5@dont-email.me...
> >> On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 06:45:56 -0600, chrisv wrote:
> >> 
> >>> vallor wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > [deletia]
> > 
> > 
> >>>> Dizum coward forgery.
> >>> 
> >>> A Linux-hater who is a forging scumbag?  Who would have guessed?
> >> 
> >> Yeah, will wonders never cease.
> >> 
> > 
> > Perhaps it's not a wonder after all. Sounds more like one of those fairy tale
> > miracles Christians are so gullible for.
> > 
> > Why deal with scientific explanations when you can just wave your hands and
> > proclaim a miracle.
> > 
> I am OK with others believing in Zeus, God, Allah, Satan, or the FSM. Their
> right to do so. Just do not push it into public schools, courts, etc. Do not
> push it onto me.
> 
> And do not whine about science being taught in schools. You can be ignorant
> if you want, but you have no right to insist the public schools support
> ignorance. 

LOL! How could he "insist" that, fool? All he can do is state it as an opinion, providing that actually is his opinion (as opposed to one you've disingenuously created on his behalf, a thing you are prone to do). And if that is his opinion, he has every right to state it, despite your apparent suggestion that his right to freedom of speech doesn't exist, Mr. PC.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330834

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 06:47:15 +0100, JEDIDIAH wrote:

> Perhaps it's not a wonder after all. Sounds more like one of those fairy
> tale miracles Christians are so gullible for.
> 
> Why deal with scientific explanations when you can just wave your hands
> and proclaim a miracle.

Anyone who believes "just so" evolution stories, has no standing to cast 
stones.

"Why did the rabbit "evolve" big ears and long feet?" "So it could run 
away faster." "Why didn't the rabbit just evolve bigger teethe and 
sharper claws?" This convenient evolution theory -- where everything 
evolves exactly what they need "just so" -- might as well be called 
creation. There's zero scientific evidence for these "just so" stories. 
It's just circular reasoning. "How do we know rabbits evolved longer legs 
and ears?" "Because they have longer ears and legs." (And this passes as 
"science" in this idiot modernist world.)

-- 
Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330839

ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 06:47:15 +0100, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>
>> Perhaps it's not a wonder after all. Sounds more like one of those fairy
>> tale miracles Christians are so gullible for.
>> 
>> Why deal with scientific explanations when you can just wave your hands
>> and proclaim a miracle.
>
> Anyone who believes "just so" evolution stories, has no standing to cast 
> stones.
>
> "Why did the rabbit "evolve" big ears and long feet?" "So it could run 
> away faster." "Why didn't the rabbit just evolve bigger teethe and 
> sharper claws?" This convenient evolution theory -- where everything 
> evolves exactly what they need "just so" -- might as well be called 
> creation. There's zero scientific evidence for these "just so" stories. 
> It's just circular reasoning. "How do we know rabbits evolved longer legs 
> and ears?" "Because they have longer ears and legs." (And this passes as 
> "science" in this idiot modernist world.)

A total mischaracterization of natural selection and evolution.
You might want to bone up on some molecular biology, as well.

-- 
I must have a prodigious quantity of mind; it takes me as much as a
week sometimes to make it up.
		-- Mark Twain, "The Innocents Abroad"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330934

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 10:11:50 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 06:47:15 +0100, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps it's not a wonder after all. Sounds more like one of those
>>> fairy tale miracles Christians are so gullible for.
>>> 
>>> Why deal with scientific explanations when you can just wave your
>>> hands and proclaim a miracle.
>>
>> Anyone who believes "just so" evolution stories, has no standing to
>> cast stones.
>>
>> "Why did the rabbit "evolve" big ears and long feet?" "So it could run
>> away faster." "Why didn't the rabbit just evolve bigger teethe and
>> sharper claws?" This convenient evolution theory -- where everything
>> evolves exactly what they need "just so" -- might as well be called
>> creation. There's zero scientific evidence for these "just so" stories.
>> It's just circular reasoning. "How do we know rabbits evolved longer
>> legs and ears?" "Because they have longer ears and legs." (And this
>> passes as "science" in this idiot modernist world.)
> 
> A total mischaracterization of natural selection and evolution.
> You might want to bone up on some molecular biology, as well.

Okay, Chris, explain to me the true "characterization" of natural 
selection. And, really, if this is "untrue" than get hold of those who 
make the nature shows and constantly regurgitate this horse shit. I'm not 
the one who comes up with this stupidity.

-- 
Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330966

ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 10:11:50 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> 
>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 06:47:15 +0100, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>
>>>> Perhaps it's not a wonder after all. Sounds more like one of those
>>>> fairy tale miracles Christians are so gullible for.
>>>> 
>>>> Why deal with scientific explanations when you can just wave your
>>>> hands and proclaim a miracle.
>>>
>>> Anyone who believes "just so" evolution stories, has no standing to
>>> cast stones.
>>>
>>> "Why did the rabbit "evolve" big ears and long feet?" "So it could run
>>> away faster." "Why didn't the rabbit just evolve bigger teethe and
>>> sharper claws?" This convenient evolution theory -- where everything
>>> evolves exactly what they need "just so" -- might as well be called
>>> creation. There's zero scientific evidence for these "just so" stories.
>>> It's just circular reasoning. "How do we know rabbits evolved longer
>>> legs and ears?" "Because they have longer ears and legs." (And this
>>> passes as "science" in this idiot modernist world.)
>> 
>> A total mischaracterization of natural selection and evolution.
>> You might want to bone up on some molecular biology, as well.
>I 
> Okay, Chris, explain to me the true "characterization" of natural 
> selection.

I've done that before. I'm not sure the repeat would be worth the time.
It's pretty difficult for me to see how "Intelligent Design" is
a satisfactory answer for a phenomenon with such a wide range of
data.

Take a gander at Richard Dawkin's works.  He is far more eloquent
and knowledgable than I, with a relentlessly rational method.

> And, really, if this is "untrue" than get hold of those who 
> make the nature shows and constantly regurgitate this horse shit. I'm not 
> the one who comes up with this stupidity.

"Nature shows"?  While they can present useful information, they're
mostly meant as entertainment.  Even some of the "physics" shows
can be pretty shitty.  Expecting scientific rigor from those shows
is a waste of time.

I remember a Philip Jose Farmer novella, and he noted that, with
all the sources of information at a person's fingertips, they could
get a Ph.D. without taking classes.

Yeah, and we'll have atomic cars any day now.

-- 
You have been selected for a secret mission.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331169

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 18:55:58 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> "Nature shows"?  While they can present useful information, they're
> mostly meant as entertainment.  Even some of the "physics" shows can be
> pretty shitty.  Expecting scientific rigor from those shows is a waste
> of time.

Expecting "scientific rigor" from Evolutionists is also a waste of time. 
These shows quote the idiot beliefs (doctrines) of evolutionists. 

-- 
Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330843

On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 8:03:14 AM UTC-7, ronb wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 06:47:15 +0100, JEDIDIAH wrote:
> 
> > Perhaps it's not a wonder after all. Sounds more like one of those fairy
> > tale miracles Christians are so gullible for.
> > 
> > Why deal with scientific explanations when you can just wave your hands
> > and proclaim a miracle.
> 
> Anyone who believes "just so" evolution stories, has no standing to cast 
> stones.
> 
> "Why did the rabbit "evolve" big ears and long feet?" "So it could run 
> away faster." "Why didn't the rabbit just evolve bigger teethe and 
> sharper claws?" This convenient evolution theory -- where everything 
> evolves exactly what they need "just so" -- might as well be called 
> creation. There's zero scientific evidence for these "just so" stories. 
> It's just circular reasoning. "How do we know rabbits evolved longer legs 
> and ears?" "Because they have longer ears and legs." (And this passes as 
> "science" in this idiot modernist world.)

Now that's a Snit level argument if there ever was one. We have plenty of fossil record indicators that support evolution. Yes, there are holes in it, like anything else, but that doesn't knock down the entire thing. If you're going down that road then you logically have to call into question written words, any written words... and all your arguments go away, too. With nothing left to discuss... I guess you guys will have to go back to advocating Linux ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330889

On 2015-11-04, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 06:47:15 +0100, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>
>> Perhaps it's not a wonder after all. Sounds more like one of those fairy
>> tale miracles Christians are so gullible for.
>> 
>> Why deal with scientific explanations when you can just wave your hands
>> and proclaim a miracle.
>
> Anyone who believes "just so" evolution stories, has no standing to cast 
> stones.
>
> "Why did the rabbit "evolve" big ears and long feet?" "So it could run 
> away faster." "Why didn't the rabbit just evolve bigger teethe and 
> sharper claws?" This convenient evolution theory -- where everything 

    Some other creature did. We call those cats.

[deletia]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330900

On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:19:02 -0600, JEDIDIAH wrote:

> On 2015-11-04, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 06:47:15 +0100, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps it's not a wonder after all. Sounds more like one of those fairy
>>> tale miracles Christians are so gullible for.
>>> 
>>> Why deal with scientific explanations when you can just wave your hands
>>> and proclaim a miracle.
>>
>> Anyone who believes "just so" evolution stories, has no standing to cast 
>> stones.
>>
>> "Why did the rabbit "evolve" big ears and long feet?" "So it could run 
>> away faster." "Why didn't the rabbit just evolve bigger teethe and 
>> sharper claws?" This convenient evolution theory -- where everything 
> 
>     Some other creature did. We call those cats.
> 
> [deletia]

Where did the first one come from?

-- 
You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330938

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:19:02 -0600, JEDIDIAH wrote:

> On 2015-11-04, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 06:47:15 +0100, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps it's not a wonder after all. Sounds more like one of those
>>> fairy tale miracles Christians are so gullible for.
>>> 
>>> Why deal with scientific explanations when you can just wave your
>>> hands and proclaim a miracle.
>>
>> Anyone who believes "just so" evolution stories, has no standing to
>> cast stones.
>>
>> "Why did the rabbit "evolve" big ears and long feet?" "So it could run
>> away faster." "Why didn't the rabbit just evolve bigger teethe and
>> sharper claws?" This convenient evolution theory -- where everything
> 
>     Some other creature did. We call those cats.
> 
> [deletia]

Yeah sure (whatever), but why didn't rabbits "evolve" that way? Is 
"Evolution" fickle?

-- 
Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 6 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web