Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #372941 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-26 22:09 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-09-28 07:50 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 135 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-26 22:09 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-27 09:01 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-27 12:08 -0500
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 10:17 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 12:13 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:23 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 15:07 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 14:13 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 16:51 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 01:16 +0200
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 18:28 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 09:49 +0200
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-28 08:04 -0500
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 15:42 +0200
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:16 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:14 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 17:28 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-28 07:02 -0500
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 17:17 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 18:30 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 18:07 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:22 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 08:52 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 11:15 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 11:13 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 14:11 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 13:45 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:40 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 10:21 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:45 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-30 03:55 +0000
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:08 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 08:31 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:23 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 14:35 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 21:42 +0000
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 21:55 +0000
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 16:46 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 15:38 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-01 01:05 +0200
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 17:04 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:04 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 07:55 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:32 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 12:22 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 11:23 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 10:35 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 14:21 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 13:48 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:46 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 10:24 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:55 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:26 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 08:31 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:22 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 15:12 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 12:24 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 14:24 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 13:49 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:47 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 10:25 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:56 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:31 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 17:53 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 15:07 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-28 20:50 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 18:02 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:53 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:51 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-29 13:03 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 10:50 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:59 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:05 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 11:02 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 22:00 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:06 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-29 12:47 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 22:11 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 10:30 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 08:56 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 11:18 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 10:32 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 14:19 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 13:47 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:43 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 11:01 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:52 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:30 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 15:07 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 12:27 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 08:45 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-27 15:24 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 16:54 -0600
Re: You can't fix dead. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 01:15 +0200
Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 18:32 -0600
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 18:04 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:35 -0600
Re: You can't fix dead. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-28 16:49 -0400
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 14:01 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:57 -0600
Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 11:01 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 11:16 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 11:55 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 11:59 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 17:22 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 17:28 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 18:38 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-30 01:47 +0000
Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 19:33 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-30 03:52 +0000
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:07 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 20:00 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 21:52 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:56 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 19:04 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 22:16 -0600
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:31 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 14:38 -0600
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 15:39 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 19:03 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-30 06:43 -0500
Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 22:13 -0600
Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 21:35 -0700
Re: Trump is a technophobe, he "very rarely" emails. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 01:03 -0700
Re: Trump is a technophobe, he "very rarely" emails. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 08:13 -0400
Re: Too much money makes you lazy, depressed. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 10:32 -0700
Re: eXercising your brain ( and body ). Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 12:32 -0700
Re: I recently deleted about 60 entries in my "Contacts" list. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 14:42 -0700
Re: Too much money makes you lazy, depressed. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-28 17:09 -0400
Re: Too much money makes you lazy, depressed. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 14:33 -0700
Re: Too much money makes you lazy, depressed. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 14:34 -0700
Re: Ben Jacoby posts via Windows 10. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-28 20:39 -0400
Re: Too much money makes you lazy, depressed. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 14:18 -0700
Re: Living ( and dying ) slower. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 01:15 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 07:50 -0400
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 11:18 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nsgu1g$i38$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #373186 |
On 09/28/2016 09:56 AM, Snit wrote: > On 9/28/16, 8:32 AM, in article nsgnqs$rb3$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > > ... >>>> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do >>>> business. Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border. Russia >>>> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere. They only have two. So who >>>> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better >>>> deal than Hillary ever will. >>> >>> Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite. >>> >> >> It sounds like snit wants this war to happen. If he is on any kind of >> subsistence packages, this war will take it away from him. > > Remember: what "sounds" to you is not relevant to my beliefs. Your beliefs are yours. They are not mine. > >>>>> Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets? >>>> >>>> During that era, yes. But the Soviets no longer exist. Since the >>>> early 90s, the KGB was dismantled. Now, because of the dishonest >>>> manner in what this country is doing, he now has started the KGB >>>> back up. >>> >>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared of something. >>> During the Cold War, they convinced Americans that Soviets were a real >>> threat and it allowed them to spend inordinate amounts of money on the >>> military. Then, they tried to convince everyone that terrorists were a >>> problem. Then, it was North Korea. Now, it's Russia again even though >>> the Muslims (not terrorists) have shown themselves to be the real >>> issue. Having Russia as an enemy is profitable because it requires >>> real spending on military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does >>> not because all it requires is for law enforcement to do their job and >>> for administrations to deport them. Why do you think that Russia is >>> the target of all hate? The sniveling little Prescott Parasite once >>> again demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic. >> >> The media does to assuage the military industrial complex. Going to war >> is not the answer. > > Neither is Nazi-like bigotry that Slimer speaks of having. I find that > reprehensible. That is our gov. stance at the current time. Any other belief would be the ostrich with its head in the sand, not wanting to hear the real truth. > >> Trump actually wants to reduce our spending by >> cutting useless government agencies and programs. We don't need them. >> By removing our forces from all around the world we'd save an awful lot >> of expenditures. I'm not sure if he will dump the entire federal >> reserve system, but it is already being dumped by other countries >> anyway, so trump may as well dump them and save a whole lot more. I >> figure by repudiating the debt to the obscene bankers, this country >> would be out of debt, but we have to find a way to pay back to other >> countries that have bought up our debt. This is where the real problem >> in this country is today... DEBT. That's why these ranchers are being >> kicked off their land so that our government can pay off that part of >> the debt to other countries, namely China, by giving our lands away to >> china. >> >> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice warrior like snit. >> They've been totally brain-washed by the progressive movement, which in >> my opinion is a communist movement. >> His actions and methods speak louder than words ever will. > > Your first five words are the only ones of that paragraph which are true in > any way. :) > On gov. spending? Of course. And that is precisely what he is bringing to the table. We'll all benefit from it in many ways. >>> >>>>>> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your >>>>>> affairs in order as you'll get drafted. >>>>> >>>>> Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Just Clinton. Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to do >>>> so. Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech that >>>> the country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial Military >>>> Complex, mainly the big corporations that make money off of war. >>>> This JFK took to heart and started the space program so that these >>>> corporations could transition to space exploration, rather than war >>>> time production. >>> >>> Well said. >>> >> >> He's even agreed that this was a good idea, but then reverts to social >> engineering tactics that are just the opposite. >> He want's division so that the progressives can win their agenda. > > The "agenda" of equal rights. HOW HORRID! > The "agenda" of course.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 10:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D4114CD8.7EBDF%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #373198 |
On 9/28/16, 10:18 AM, in article nsgu1g$i38$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > On 09/28/2016 09:56 AM, Snit wrote: >> On 9/28/16, 8:32 AM, in article nsgnqs$rb3$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >> >> ... >>>>> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do >>>>> business. Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border. Russia >>>>> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere. They only have two. So who >>>>> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better >>>>> deal than Hillary ever will. >>>> >>>> Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite. >>>> >>> >>> It sounds like snit wants this war to happen. If he is on any kind of >>> subsistence packages, this war will take it away from him. >> >> Remember: what "sounds" to you is not relevant to my beliefs. > > Your beliefs are yours. > They are not mine. Correct: so when you say I want "this war" to happen I can unequivocally tell you that you are wrong, even if it "seems" to you otherwise. >>>>>> Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets? >>>>> >>>>> During that era, yes. But the Soviets no longer exist. Since the >>>>> early 90s, the KGB was dismantled. Now, because of the dishonest >>>>> manner in what this country is doing, he now has started the KGB >>>>> back up. >>>> >>>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared of something. >>>> During the Cold War, they convinced Americans that Soviets were a real >>>> threat and it allowed them to spend inordinate amounts of money on the >>>> military. Then, they tried to convince everyone that terrorists were a >>>> problem. Then, it was North Korea. Now, it's Russia again even though >>>> the Muslims (not terrorists) have shown themselves to be the real >>>> issue. Having Russia as an enemy is profitable because it requires >>>> real spending on military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does >>>> not because all it requires is for law enforcement to do their job and >>>> for administrations to deport them. Why do you think that Russia is >>>> the target of all hate? The sniveling little Prescott Parasite once >>>> again demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic. >>> >>> The media does to assuage the military industrial complex. Going to war >>> is not the answer. >> >> Neither is Nazi-like bigotry that Slimer speaks of having. I find that >> reprehensible. > > That is our gov. stance at the current time. Trump is pushing much of the same Nazi-like bigotry. > Any other belief would be the ostrich with its head in the sand, not > wanting to hear the real truth. > >> >>> Trump actually wants to reduce our spending by >>> cutting useless government agencies and programs. We don't need them. >>> By removing our forces from all around the world we'd save an awful lot >>> of expenditures. I'm not sure if he will dump the entire federal >>> reserve system, but it is already being dumped by other countries >>> anyway, so trump may as well dump them and save a whole lot more. I >>> figure by repudiating the debt to the obscene bankers, this country >>> would be out of debt, but we have to find a way to pay back to other >>> countries that have bought up our debt. This is where the real problem >>> in this country is today... DEBT. That's why these ranchers are being >>> kicked off their land so that our government can pay off that part of >>> the debt to other countries, namely China, by giving our lands away to >>> china. >>> >>> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice warrior like snit. >>> They've been totally brain-washed by the progressive movement, which in >>> my opinion is a communist movement. >>> His actions and methods speak louder than words ever will. >> >> Your first five words are the only ones of that paragraph which are true in >> any way. :) >> > > On gov. spending? No, when you said: "It is hard to reason..." I was being snarky in response to your insults. > Of course. And that is precisely what he is bringing > to the table. > We'll all benefit from it in many ways. > >>>> >>>>>>> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your >>>>>>> affairs in order as you'll get drafted. >>>>>> >>>>>> Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Just Clinton. Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to do >>>>> so. Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech that >>>>> the country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial Military >>>>> Complex, mainly the big corporations that make money off of war. >>>>> This JFK took to heart and started the space program so that these >>>>> corporations could transition to space exploration, rather than war >>>>> time production. >>>> >>>> Well said. >>>> >>> >>> He's even agreed that this was a good idea, but then reverts to social >>> engineering tactics that are just the opposite. >>> He want's division so that the progressives can win their agenda. >> >> The "agenda" of equal rights. HOW HORRID! >> > > The "agenda" of course. Of equal rights? That, I think, is the primary "Progressive agenda." -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 14:19 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nsh8ju$u2l$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #373207 |
On 09/28/2016 11:32 AM, Snit wrote: > On 9/28/16, 10:18 AM, in article nsgu1g$i38$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > >> On 09/28/2016 09:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>> On 9/28/16, 8:32 AM, in article nsgnqs$rb3$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>>>> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do >>>>>> business. Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border. Russia >>>>>> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere. They only have two. So who >>>>>> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better >>>>>> deal than Hillary ever will. >>>>> >>>>> Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite. >>>>> >>>> >>>> It sounds like snit wants this war to happen. If he is on any kind of >>>> subsistence packages, this war will take it away from him. >>> >>> Remember: what "sounds" to you is not relevant to my beliefs. >> >> Your beliefs are yours. >> They are not mine. > > Correct: so when you say I want "this war" to happen I can unequivocally > tell you that you are wrong, even if it "seems" to you otherwise. > Sure sounds like it. You don't want Trump in office, so you must want war. >>>>>>> Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets? >>>>>> >>>>>> During that era, yes. But the Soviets no longer exist. Since the >>>>>> early 90s, the KGB was dismantled. Now, because of the dishonest >>>>>> manner in what this country is doing, he now has started the KGB >>>>>> back up. >>>>> >>>>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared of something. >>>>> During the Cold War, they convinced Americans that Soviets were a real >>>>> threat and it allowed them to spend inordinate amounts of money on the >>>>> military. Then, they tried to convince everyone that terrorists were a >>>>> problem. Then, it was North Korea. Now, it's Russia again even though >>>>> the Muslims (not terrorists) have shown themselves to be the real >>>>> issue. Having Russia as an enemy is profitable because it requires >>>>> real spending on military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does >>>>> not because all it requires is for law enforcement to do their job and >>>>> for administrations to deport them. Why do you think that Russia is >>>>> the target of all hate? The sniveling little Prescott Parasite once >>>>> again demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic. >>>> >>>> The media does to assuage the military industrial complex. Going to war >>>> is not the answer. >>> >>> Neither is Nazi-like bigotry that Slimer speaks of having. I find that >>> reprehensible. >> >> That is our gov. stance at the current time. > > Trump is pushing much of the same Nazi-like bigotry. > What nazi-like bigotry? I haven't seen that yet. >> Any other belief would be the ostrich with its head in the sand, not >> wanting to hear the real truth. >> >>> >>>> Trump actually wants to reduce our spending by >>>> cutting useless government agencies and programs. We don't need them. >>>> By removing our forces from all around the world we'd save an awful lot >>>> of expenditures. I'm not sure if he will dump the entire federal >>>> reserve system, but it is already being dumped by other countries >>>> anyway, so trump may as well dump them and save a whole lot more. I >>>> figure by repudiating the debt to the obscene bankers, this country >>>> would be out of debt, but we have to find a way to pay back to other >>>> countries that have bought up our debt. This is where the real problem >>>> in this country is today... DEBT. That's why these ranchers are being >>>> kicked off their land so that our government can pay off that part of >>>> the debt to other countries, namely China, by giving our lands away to >>>> china. >>>> >>>> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice warrior like snit. >>>> They've been totally brain-washed by the progressive movement, which in >>>> my opinion is a communist movement. >>>> His actions and methods speak louder than words ever will. >>> >>> Your first five words are the only ones of that paragraph which are true in >>> any way. :) >>> >> >> On gov. spending? > > No, when you said: "It is hard to reason..." > > I was being snarky in response to your insults. And you weren't insulting? LOL!!! You do sound like a social warrior trying to get people to see things your way. It won't work. > >> Of course. And that is precisely what he is bringing >> to the table. >> We'll all benefit from it in many ways. >> >>>>> >>>>>>>> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your >>>>>>>> affairs in order as you'll get drafted. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Just Clinton. Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to do >>>>>> so. Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech that >>>>>> the country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial Military >>>>>> Complex, mainly the big corporations that make money off of war. >>>>>> This JFK took to heart and started the space program so that these >>>>>> corporations could transition to space exploration, rather than war >>>>>> time production. >>>>> >>>>> Well said. >>>>> >>>> >>>> He's even agreed that this was a good idea, but then reverts to social >>>> engineering tactics that are just the opposite. >>>> He want's division so that the progressives can win their agenda. >>> >>> The "agenda" of equal rights. HOW HORRID! >>> >> >> The "agenda" of course. > > Of equal rights? That, I think, is the primary "Progressive agenda." > No. The communist agenda. To overthrow this country. Of course you may not be aware of the law, that says anyone caught trying to overthrow this country may be either put in prison or shot to death. You should realize now that Progressive = Communist. You should read the Communist Manifesto. http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 13:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D4117A74.7EC62%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #373242 |
On 9/28/16, 1:19 PM, in article nsh8ju$u2l$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > On 09/28/2016 11:32 AM, Snit wrote: >> On 9/28/16, 10:18 AM, in article nsgu1g$i38$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >> >>> On 09/28/2016 09:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 9/28/16, 8:32 AM, in article nsgnqs$rb3$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>>>>> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do >>>>>>> business. Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border. Russia >>>>>>> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere. They only have two. So who >>>>>>> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better >>>>>>> deal than Hillary ever will. >>>>>> >>>>>> Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It sounds like snit wants this war to happen. If he is on any kind of >>>>> subsistence packages, this war will take it away from him. >>>> >>>> Remember: what "sounds" to you is not relevant to my beliefs. >>> >>> Your beliefs are yours. >>> They are not mine. >> >> Correct: so when you say I want "this war" to happen I can unequivocally >> tell you that you are wrong, even if it "seems" to you otherwise. >> > > Sure sounds like it. You don't want Trump in office, so you must want war. False dichotomy. >>>>>>>> Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> During that era, yes. But the Soviets no longer exist. Since the >>>>>>> early 90s, the KGB was dismantled. Now, because of the dishonest >>>>>>> manner in what this country is doing, he now has started the KGB >>>>>>> back up. >>>>>> >>>>>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared of something. >>>>>> During the Cold War, they convinced Americans that Soviets were a real >>>>>> threat and it allowed them to spend inordinate amounts of money on the >>>>>> military. Then, they tried to convince everyone that terrorists were a >>>>>> problem. Then, it was North Korea. Now, it's Russia again even though >>>>>> the Muslims (not terrorists) have shown themselves to be the real >>>>>> issue. Having Russia as an enemy is profitable because it requires >>>>>> real spending on military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does >>>>>> not because all it requires is for law enforcement to do their job and >>>>>> for administrations to deport them. Why do you think that Russia is >>>>>> the target of all hate? The sniveling little Prescott Parasite once >>>>>> again demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic. >>>>> >>>>> The media does to assuage the military industrial complex. Going to war >>>>> is not the answer. >>>> >>>> Neither is Nazi-like bigotry that Slimer speaks of having. I find that >>>> reprehensible. >>> >>> That is our gov. stance at the current time. >> >> Trump is pushing much of the same Nazi-like bigotry. > > What nazi-like bigotry? > I haven't seen that yet. We already talked about his attacks on Muslims. And then you agreed saying it is not their country... when Muslim Americans are as much citizens as you and I. >>> Any other belief would be the ostrich with its head in the sand, not >>> wanting to hear the real truth. >>> >>>> >>>>> Trump actually wants to reduce our spending by >>>>> cutting useless government agencies and programs. We don't need them. >>>>> By removing our forces from all around the world we'd save an awful lot >>>>> of expenditures. I'm not sure if he will dump the entire federal >>>>> reserve system, but it is already being dumped by other countries >>>>> anyway, so trump may as well dump them and save a whole lot more. I >>>>> figure by repudiating the debt to the obscene bankers, this country >>>>> would be out of debt, but we have to find a way to pay back to other >>>>> countries that have bought up our debt. This is where the real problem >>>>> in this country is today... DEBT. That's why these ranchers are being >>>>> kicked off their land so that our government can pay off that part of >>>>> the debt to other countries, namely China, by giving our lands away to >>>>> china. >>>>> >>>>> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice warrior like snit. >>>>> They've been totally brain-washed by the progressive movement, which in >>>>> my opinion is a communist movement. >>>>> His actions and methods speak louder than words ever will. >>>> >>>> Your first five words are the only ones of that paragraph which are true in >>>> any way. :) >>>> >>> >>> On gov. spending? >> >> No, when you said: "It is hard to reason..." >> >> I was being snarky in response to your insults. > > And you weren't insulting? LOL!!! > You do sound like a social warrior trying to get people to see things > your way. It won't work. I am using logic and reason to try to "convince" someone swayed by emotion... so, no, it will not work. >> >>> Of course. And that is precisely what he is bringing >>> to the table. >>> We'll all benefit from it in many ways. >>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your >>>>>>>>> affairs in order as you'll get drafted. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just Clinton. Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to do >>>>>>> so. Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech that >>>>>>> the country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial Military >>>>>>> Complex, mainly the big corporations that make money off of war. >>>>>>> This JFK took to heart and started the space program so that these >>>>>>> corporations could transition to space exploration, rather than war >>>>>>> time production. >>>>>> >>>>>> Well said. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> He's even agreed that this was a good idea, but then reverts to social >>>>> engineering tactics that are just the opposite. >>>>> He want's division so that the progressives can win their agenda. >>>> >>>> The "agenda" of equal rights. HOW HORRID! >>>> >>> >>> The "agenda" of course. >> >> Of equal rights? That, I think, is the primary "Progressive agenda." >> > > No. The communist agenda. To overthrow this country. Of course you > may not be aware of the law, that says > anyone caught trying to overthrow this country may be either put in > prison or shot to death. You should realize now that Progressive = > Communist. > > You should read the Communist Manifesto. > > http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html Why change the topic to Communists? Seriously, WTF? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 10:43 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nsjgbs$ajb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #373263 |
On 09/28/2016 02:47 PM, Snit wrote: > On 9/28/16, 1:19 PM, in article nsh8ju$u2l$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > >> On 09/28/2016 11:32 AM, Snit wrote: >>> On 9/28/16, 10:18 AM, in article nsgu1g$i38$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 09/28/2016 09:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 9/28/16, 8:32 AM, in article nsgnqs$rb3$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>>>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>>>>> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do >>>>>>>> business. Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border. Russia >>>>>>>> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere. They only have two. So who >>>>>>>> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better >>>>>>>> deal than Hillary ever will. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It sounds like snit wants this war to happen. If he is on any kind of >>>>>> subsistence packages, this war will take it away from him. >>>>> >>>>> Remember: what "sounds" to you is not relevant to my beliefs. >>>> >>>> Your beliefs are yours. >>>> They are not mine. >>> >>> Correct: so when you say I want "this war" to happen I can unequivocally >>> tell you that you are wrong, even if it "seems" to you otherwise. >>> >> >> Sure sounds like it. You don't want Trump in office, so you must want war. > > False dichotomy. On what grounds? I'd prefer a Mason in office over a dumb communist. > >>>>>>>>> Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> During that era, yes. But the Soviets no longer exist. Since the >>>>>>>> early 90s, the KGB was dismantled. Now, because of the dishonest >>>>>>>> manner in what this country is doing, he now has started the KGB >>>>>>>> back up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared of something. >>>>>>> During the Cold War, they convinced Americans that Soviets were a real >>>>>>> threat and it allowed them to spend inordinate amounts of money on the >>>>>>> military. Then, they tried to convince everyone that terrorists were a >>>>>>> problem. Then, it was North Korea. Now, it's Russia again even though >>>>>>> the Muslims (not terrorists) have shown themselves to be the real >>>>>>> issue. Having Russia as an enemy is profitable because it requires >>>>>>> real spending on military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does >>>>>>> not because all it requires is for law enforcement to do their job and >>>>>>> for administrations to deport them. Why do you think that Russia is >>>>>>> the target of all hate? The sniveling little Prescott Parasite once >>>>>>> again demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic. >>>>>> >>>>>> The media does to assuage the military industrial complex. Going to war >>>>>> is not the answer. >>>>> >>>>> Neither is Nazi-like bigotry that Slimer speaks of having. I find that >>>>> reprehensible. >>>> >>>> That is our gov. stance at the current time. >>> >>> Trump is pushing much of the same Nazi-like bigotry. >> >> What nazi-like bigotry? >> I haven't seen that yet. > > We already talked about his attacks on Muslims. And then you agreed saying > it is not their country... when Muslim Americans are as much citizens as you > and I. > While the muslims are raping and killing americans? You call that an attack? Guffaw!!! >>>> Any other belief would be the ostrich with its head in the sand, not >>>> wanting to hear the real truth. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Trump actually wants to reduce our spending by >>>>>> cutting useless government agencies and programs. We don't need them. >>>>>> By removing our forces from all around the world we'd save an awful lot >>>>>> of expenditures. I'm not sure if he will dump the entire federal >>>>>> reserve system, but it is already being dumped by other countries >>>>>> anyway, so trump may as well dump them and save a whole lot more. I >>>>>> figure by repudiating the debt to the obscene bankers, this country >>>>>> would be out of debt, but we have to find a way to pay back to other >>>>>> countries that have bought up our debt. This is where the real problem >>>>>> in this country is today... DEBT. That's why these ranchers are being >>>>>> kicked off their land so that our government can pay off that part of >>>>>> the debt to other countries, namely China, by giving our lands away to >>>>>> china. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice warrior like snit. >>>>>> They've been totally brain-washed by the progressive movement, which in >>>>>> my opinion is a communist movement. >>>>>> His actions and methods speak louder than words ever will. >>>>> >>>>> Your first five words are the only ones of that paragraph which are true in >>>>> any way. :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> On gov. spending? >>> >>> No, when you said: "It is hard to reason..." >>> >>> I was being snarky in response to your insults. >> >> And you weren't insulting? LOL!!! >> You do sound like a social warrior trying to get people to see things >> your way. It won't work. > > I am using logic and reason to try to "convince" someone swayed by > emotion... so, no, it will not work. It is called Propaganda. Some people think they are using logic, but they use their logic with false data, creating a false conclusion. > >>> >>>> Of course. And that is precisely what he is bringing >>>> to the table. >>>> We'll all benefit from it in many ways. >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your >>>>>>>>>> affairs in order as you'll get drafted. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just Clinton. Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to do >>>>>>>> so. Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech that >>>>>>>> the country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial Military >>>>>>>> Complex, mainly the big corporations that make money off of war. >>>>>>>> This JFK took to heart and started the space program so that these >>>>>>>> corporations could transition to space exploration, rather than war >>>>>>>> time production. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well said. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> He's even agreed that this was a good idea, but then reverts to social >>>>>> engineering tactics that are just the opposite. >>>>>> He want's division so that the progressives can win their agenda. >>>>> >>>>> The "agenda" of equal rights. HOW HORRID! >>>>> >>>> >>>> The "agenda" of course. >>> >>> Of equal rights? That, I think, is the primary "Progressive agenda." >>> >> >> No. The communist agenda. To overthrow this country. Of course you >> may not be aware of the law, that says >> anyone caught trying to overthrow this country may be either put in >> prison or shot to death. You should realize now that Progressive = >> Communist. >> >> You should read the Communist Manifesto. >> >> http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html > > Why change the topic to Communists? Seriously, WTF? > Because they are the ones pushing all this crap in our faces everyday. Like "Politically Correct Speech" as an example. I take it you don't want anybody to have liberty then.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 11:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D412A51C.7EDF2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #373394 |
On 9/29/16, 9:43 AM, in article nsjgbs$ajb$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: ... >>>>>>>>> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do >>>>>>>>> business. Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border. Russia >>>>>>>>> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere. They only have two. So who >>>>>>>>> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better >>>>>>>>> deal than Hillary ever will. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It sounds like snit wants this war to happen. If he is on any kind of >>>>>>> subsistence packages, this war will take it away from him. >>>>>> >>>>>> Remember: what "sounds" to you is not relevant to my beliefs. >>>>> >>>>> Your beliefs are yours. >>>>> They are not mine. >>>> >>>> Correct: so when you say I want "this war" to happen I can unequivocally >>>> tell you that you are wrong, even if it "seems" to you otherwise. >>>> >>> >>> Sure sounds like it. You don't want Trump in office, so you must want war. >> >> False dichotomy. > > On what grounds? Other than "logic" what are you looking for. Maybe you need to look up what a false dichotomy is? You say I either want A or B... when the reality is I want neither, and even worse it is almost certain that Trump will lead to war. Your comment is just not a logical statement on any level. > I'd prefer a Mason in office over a dumb communist. The communists do not even have a candidate they are running, no less one on any ballot. ... >> We already talked about his attacks on Muslims. And then you agreed saying >> it is not their country... when Muslim Americans are as much citizens as you >> and I. > > While the muslims are raping and killing americans? You call that an > attack? Guffaw!!! I am noting your gross bigotry and Nazi-like rhetoric. ... >> I am using logic and reason to try to "convince" someone swayed by >> emotion... so, no, it will not work. > > It is called Propaganda. Some people think they are using logic, but > they use their logic with false data, creating a false conclusion. Not relevant to my point. Again: I am focused more on logic... you on emotion. We are not going to see eye-to-eye. ... >> Why change the topic to Communists? Seriously, WTF? > > Because they are the ones pushing all this crap in our faces everyday. > Like "Politically Correct Speech" as an example. > I take it you don't want anybody to have liberty then. Not biting on your argument-by-emotion. Again, remember that I look for evidence. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 21:52 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nsknii$r61$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #373461 |
On 09/29/2016 12:01 PM, Snit wrote: > On 9/29/16, 9:43 AM, in article nsjgbs$ajb$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > > ... >>>>>>>>>> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do >>>>>>>>>> business. Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border. Russia >>>>>>>>>> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere. They only have two. So who >>>>>>>>>> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better >>>>>>>>>> deal than Hillary ever will. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It sounds like snit wants this war to happen. If he is on any kind of >>>>>>>> subsistence packages, this war will take it away from him. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Remember: what "sounds" to you is not relevant to my beliefs. >>>>>> >>>>>> Your beliefs are yours. >>>>>> They are not mine. >>>>> >>>>> Correct: so when you say I want "this war" to happen I can unequivocally >>>>> tell you that you are wrong, even if it "seems" to you otherwise. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Sure sounds like it. You don't want Trump in office, so you must want war. >>> >>> False dichotomy. >> >> On what grounds? > > Other than "logic" what are you looking for. Maybe you need to look up what > a false dichotomy is? You say I either want A or B... when the reality is I > want neither, and even worse it is almost certain that Trump will lead to > war. But that isn't what you were saying tho. You have no proof that Trump will lead us to war. Yet I showed you a video of Putin explaining this part to the bone-headed press. Hillary wants WWIII because her big donors want it... mainly the central bank. Even history has shown that, as well as General Smedley of the U.S.M.C., who said that war is a racket. Only this time everyone loses. > > Your comment is just not a logical statement on any level. > That is so typical of the CIA. >> I'd prefer a Mason in office over a dumb communist. > > The communists do not even have a candidate they are running, no less one on > any ballot. They refer to themselves as Socialists. And they are on the 2016 ballot. That's how communists lie to the public, feeling that Socialism isn't communism. > > ... >>> We already talked about his attacks on Muslims. And then you agreed saying >>> it is not their country... when Muslim Americans are as much citizens as you >>> and I. >> >> While the muslims are raping and killing americans? You call that an >> attack? Guffaw!!! > > I am noting your gross bigotry and Nazi-like rhetoric. > I am noticing your left-wing radical approach to propaganda that sits heavily against the law of the land too. > ... >>> I am using logic and reason to try to "convince" someone swayed by >>> emotion... so, no, it will not work. >> >> It is called Propaganda. Some people think they are using logic, but >> they use their logic with false data, creating a false conclusion. > > Not relevant to my point. Again: I am focused more on logic... you on > emotion. We are not going to see eye-to-eye. > Guffaw!!! Very much relevant. You just don't want to hear it is all. > ... >>> Why change the topic to Communists? Seriously, WTF? >> >> Because they are the ones pushing all this crap in our faces everyday. >> Like "Politically Correct Speech" as an example. >> I take it you don't want anybody to have liberty then. > > Not biting on your argument-by-emotion. Again, remember that I look for > evidence. > So you don't want liberty then. Fine by me, and don't forget when FEMA comes around, just hop into their van. They'll feed you and house you. Later they expect some work out of you too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 21:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D413387A.7EEC8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #373562 |
On 9/29/16, 8:52 PM, in article nsknii$r61$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: ... >>>>> Sure sounds like it. You don't want Trump in office, so you must want >>>>> war. >>>> >>>> False dichotomy. >>> >>> On what grounds? >> >> Other than "logic" what are you looking for. Maybe you need to look up what >> a false dichotomy is? You say I either want A or B... when the reality is I >> want neither, and even worse it is almost certain that Trump will lead to >> war. > > But that isn't what you were saying tho. You have no proof that Trump > will lead us to war. We cannot prove the future so this is true of anyone. > Yet I showed you a video of Putin explaining this part to the bone-headed > press. Hillary wants WWIII because her big donors want it... mainly the > central bank. And this is just silly. Same nonsense they said about Obama. Remember: I look for evidence and data and not just your feelings. > Even history has shown that, as well as General Smedley of the > U.S.M.C., who said that war is a racket. Only this time everyone loses. Both are likely to lead to war. >> Your comment is just not a logical statement on any level. > > That is so typical of the CIA. Er? >>> I'd prefer a Mason in office over a dumb communist. >> >> The communists do not even have a candidate they are running, no less one on >> any ballot. > > They refer to themselves as Socialists. The Socialists do not have a candidate, AND they are not the same as the Communists. These are simple facts. Again: your denial of facts is just silly. > And they are on the 2016 ballot. This is not true. > That's how communists lie to the public, feeling that Socialism isn't > communism. At this point you have to be trolling. ... >> I am noting your gross bigotry and Nazi-like rhetoric. > > I am noticing your left-wing radical approach to propaganda that sits > heavily against the law of the land too. Keep in mind you deem reality to be "left-wing radical"... so your comments on that are not exactly strong. :) >> ... >>>> I am using logic and reason to try to "convince" someone swayed by >>>> emotion... so, no, it will not work. >>> >>> It is called Propaganda. Some people think they are using logic, but >>> they use their logic with false data, creating a false conclusion. >> >> Not relevant to my point. Again: I am focused more on logic... you on >> emotion. We are not going to see eye-to-eye. > > Guffaw!!! Very much relevant. You just don't want to hear it is all. At some point you might actually try to support your claims. But I doubt it. :) >> ... >>>> Why change the topic to Communists? Seriously, WTF? >>> >>> Because they are the ones pushing all this crap in our faces everyday. >>> Like "Politically Correct Speech" as an example. >>> I take it you don't want anybody to have liberty then. >> >> Not biting on your argument-by-emotion. Again, remember that I look for >> evidence. > > So you don't want liberty then. LOL! See: pure emotion from you. NO logic. > Fine by me, and don't forget when FEMA comes around, just hop into their van. > They'll feed you and house you. Later they expect some work out of you too. Again: at this point you have to just be trolling. Right? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 15:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nsh4di$dst$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #373198 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-09-28 1:18 PM, the sniveling Prescott Parasite rambled: >> Neither is Nazi-like bigotry that Slimer speaks of having. I find >> that reprehensible. The only Nazi here is _you_ . You're the only twat in this newsgroup who is a brain-dead liberal who believes that things need to be done his way and that everything else is wrong. Nazism was based on censoring, propaganda and lies and that's exactly what _YOU_ do Adolf Glasser Prescott Computer Nazi. Just take note of how you very gladly told all Linux users that the way their desktop environments work is wrong and then explain to me how your position promotes freedom. Disgusting little turd. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX7BT9AAoJEIwFfgf/rr+u8rgH/1YzSwU37yl0IDhHq3DD+gaW IPofHCqCxGosXXrzw8eChxeAHjc76BBvdGj/OzrY5Ifqh6sUNYQwqgDsweV0JsvJ uy1narH34auc2QI1Ur66nMohBG/tBA+rIb9piYbb5ayx8Ueq8aQR7NYlZmw93Haa ed1zMPW/Rh26xIyAy4RBH7fJe3FRr3jXA3JaDj2JWmricqMM59P36aRgAIbhS4os j+RC1Wvwp8wgFxnBxz478zFYN+5Tap/9aRw2dEIqBXFBv62gz5JkUlom5xJ+vg+Q lBZFHjWrYWlw/j4hvN9V51U2I65nnz4c+MSxoAZTWoNUpkWHR8o+WcVuAb1/gC0= =VpYE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 12:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D41167AF.7EC25%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #373219 |
On 9/28/16, 12:07 PM, in article nsh4di$dst$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2016-09-28 1:18 PM, the sniveling Prescott Parasite rambled: > >>> Neither is Nazi-like bigotry that Slimer speaks of having. I find >>> that reprehensible. > > The only Nazi here is _you_ . You are the one who pushes Nazi-like hatred of other groups and back a candidate who speaks of using Nazi-like techniques of making groups have special IDs. You can twist and lie all you want... but that is the truth. > You're the only twat in this newsgroup who is a brain-dead liberal who > believes that things need to be done his way and that everything else is > wrong. Done whose way? > Nazism was based on censoring, propaganda and lies and that's exactly > what _YOU_ do Adolf Glasser Prescott Computer Nazi. A direct lie from you. > Just take note of how you very gladly told all Linux users that the way their > desktop environments work is wrong and then explain to me how your position > promotes freedom. Disgusting little turd. What do you even mean here? There environment is "wrong"... for what? Use what you like. Remember: I am the one who promotes equal rights... and you are the one who argues I am wrong. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 08:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D41133A2.7EB6D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #373096 |
On 9/28/16, 4:55 AM, in article nsgb42$d7b$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2016-09-27 6:51 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> On 09/27/2016 03:13 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 9/27/16, 2:07 PM, in article nsen2o$1i6$2@dont-email.me, >>> "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 09/27/2016 12:23 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 9/27/16, 11:13 AM, in article nsecr9$p2v$6@dont-email.me, >>>>> "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> This election is odd in that both parties have selected >>>>>>> their least liked, least trusted candidates. It is rather >>>>>>> insane. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But I do agree it matters little who is elected. If Trump >>>>>>> gets in then the bigots will have justification to push >>>>>>> their bigotry more... but that is about it. In four years >>>>>>> we will have a back-lash from either. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> And Putin promised that if its Hillary, then it will be >>>>>> WWIII. >>>>> >>>>> Sigh. By all means show that. >>>>> >>>>> Let me guess: no video but Alex Jones heard him personally. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Try doing a search in YouTube. >>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4ythLYtbEs >>> >>> So no actual quote or video just a blogger similar to Alex >>> Jones? >>> >>>> And many others like it on Youtube as well. >>> >>> Putin does seem to prefer Trump... which is not exactly a reason >>> to back him! > > OH MY GOD! A leader at the other side of the world who has no impact > whatsoever on the United States backs one of the candidates? No impact? LOL! I look forward to you backing THAT on! > Run for the hills! What an _idiotic_ decision not to back a candidate. Which is not what was being discussed. To be clear: you made that up. > This Prescott Parasite is truly a sponge for whatever the mainstream media > says. What? You use that line over and over but do not even show you understand what that insult means. It is like you heard Alex Jones say it as an insult, did not understand it, and now repeat it over and over. Weird. > At the very least, knowing that a foreign leader that is hard to deal > with approves of you _facilitates_ diplomacy with that nation in the future. > If anything, it's a reason *TO* back Trump you sniveling little snot. Ah, so if Iraq and Iran back a candidate that would push you to? LOL! Logic is not your strong area. :) >> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do >> business. Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border. Russia >> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere. They only have two. So who >> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better >> deal than Hillary ever will. > > Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite. Trump is not a good businessman... basic logic. But you have insults and nothing else. >>> Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets? >>> >> >> During that era, yes. But the Soviets no longer exist. Since the >> early 90s, the KGB was dismantled. Now, because of the dishonest >> manner in what this country is doing, he now has started the KGB >> back up. > > American media always wants its citizens to be scared of something. Such as Muslims. Trump is pushing that, too. Oh, and blacks and the poor. And you buy into ALL of that. It is, sadly, like watching Nazi Germany happen again -- the weakest of the population are blamed for the wrongs and you eat it up and spew your bigoted hatred. ... > Having Russia as an enemy is profitable because it requires > real spending on military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does > not because all it requires is for law enforcement to do their job and > for administrations to deport them. Deport people for their religion! Seriously, just go to hell. That is the antithesis of what America is about. That is the antithesis to reason and logic and common sense. That is the antithesis to equal rights. You are completely and absolutely against equal rights. > Why do you think that Russia is the target of all hate? What hate? Keep in mind YOU are the only one demonstrating hatred of anyone. YOU. > The sniveling little > Prescott Parasite once again demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic. Projection on your part. >>>> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your >>>> affairs in order as you'll get drafted. >>> >>> Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war. >>> >> >> Just Clinton. Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to do >> so. Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech that >> the country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial Military >> Complex, mainly the big corporations that make money off of war. >> This JFK took to heart and started the space program so that these >> corporations could transition to space exploration, rather than war >> time production. > > Well said. Trump is an emotional child who spends time in presidential debates defending his sexist attacks and denying his own record time and time again. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-27 15:24 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: You can't fix dead. |
| Message-ID | <57EAF1A3.65DE@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #372941 |
Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > You ( Michael Glasser ) replied ( to me ): > > > Hillary is better informed and more factual, > > > but Trump has more energy. > > > Bottom Line: Trump _might_ be the LeastWorst. > > > > I was with a group with a lot of side debates and discussions... > > a lot of fun but will watch it again to focus on it better. :) > > Trump is a technophobe, he's never emailed anyone. > I doubt he could Google, much less read the results. > > NoneTheLess, he makes Hillary look like a corpse. > He could _hire_ someone to Google for him, if need be. > You can't fix dead. You don't send emails to the Mafia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-27 16:54 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: You can't fix dead. |
| Message-ID | <nset9v$p9s$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #373054 |
On 09/27/2016 04:24 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> >> You ( Michael Glasser ) replied ( to me ): >>>> Hillary is better informed and more factual, >>>> but Trump has more energy. >>>> Bottom Line: Trump _might_ be the LeastWorst. >>> >>> I was with a group with a lot of side debates and discussions... >>> a lot of fun but will watch it again to focus on it better. :) >> >> Trump is a technophobe, he's never emailed anyone. >> I doubt he could Google, much less read the results. >> >> NoneTheLess, he makes Hillary look like a corpse. >> He could _hire_ someone to Google for him, if need be. >> You can't fix dead. > > > > You don't send emails to the Mafia. > A better question here is how would Jeff know what Trump can and can't do with a computer?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 01:15 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: You can't fix dead. |
| Message-ID | <nseuht$st4$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #373062 |
GreyCloud wrote: > On 09/27/2016 04:24 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>> >>> You ( Michael Glasser ) replied ( to me ): >>>>> Hillary is better informed and more factual, >>>>> but Trump has more energy. >>>>> Bottom Line: Trump _might_ be the LeastWorst. >>>> >>>> I was with a group with a lot of side debates and discussions... >>>> a lot of fun but will watch it again to focus on it better. :) >>> >>> Trump is a technophobe, he's never emailed anyone. >>> I doubt he could Google, much less read the results. >>> >>> NoneTheLess, he makes Hillary look like a corpse. >>> He could _hire_ someone to Google for him, if need be. >>> You can't fix dead. >> >> >> >> You don't send emails to the Mafia. >> > > A better question here is how would Jeff know what Trump can and can't > do with a computer? Well, he can certainly use it as a doorstep. That is basically all he can
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-27 18:32 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: You can't fix dead. |
| Message-ID | <nsf32d$7ue$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #373064 |
On 09/27/2016 05:15 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > GreyCloud wrote: > >> On 09/27/2016 04:24 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>> >>>> You ( Michael Glasser ) replied ( to me ): >>>>>> Hillary is better informed and more factual, >>>>>> but Trump has more energy. >>>>>> Bottom Line: Trump _might_ be the LeastWorst. >>>>> >>>>> I was with a group with a lot of side debates and discussions... >>>>> a lot of fun but will watch it again to focus on it better. :) >>>> >>>> Trump is a technophobe, he's never emailed anyone. >>>> I doubt he could Google, much less read the results. >>>> >>>> NoneTheLess, he makes Hillary look like a corpse. >>>> He could _hire_ someone to Google for him, if need be. >>>> You can't fix dead. >>> >>> >>> >>> You don't send emails to the Mafia. >>> >> >> A better question here is how would Jeff know what Trump can and can't >> do with a computer? > > Well, he can certainly use it as a doorstep. That is basically all he can > I think that a lot of people haven't actually watched or listened to his speeches this year. After all, he is a successful business man that the chimp ever was (G.W. Bush). I think he knows how they work. Hillary has already said she knows little of computers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-27 18:04 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: You can't fix dead. |
| Message-ID | <D4106510.7EAA0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #373074 |
On 9/27/16, 5:32 PM, in article nsf32d$7ue$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>>> You don't send emails to the Mafia. >>>> >>> >>> A better question here is how would Jeff know what Trump can and can't >>> do with a computer? >> >> Well, he can certainly use it as a doorstep. That is basically all he can >> > > I think that a lot of people haven't actually watched or listened to his > speeches this year. After all, he is a successful business man that the > chimp ever was (G.W. Bush). > I think he knows how they work. Hillary has already said she knows > little of computers. Getting a huge loan from your daddy and then handling it less well than investing in the stock market does NOT make one a good businessman. Nor does screwing over others and not caring one whit... which he basically bragged about in the debate. He does not even care about looking like a decent person. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 09:35 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: You can't fix dead. |
| Message-ID | <nsgnvp$rb3$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #373077 |
On 09/27/2016 07:04 PM, Snit wrote: > On 9/27/16, 5:32 PM, in article nsf32d$7ue$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > >>>>> You don't send emails to the Mafia. >>>>> >>>> >>>> A better question here is how would Jeff know what Trump can and can't >>>> do with a computer? >>> >>> Well, he can certainly use it as a doorstep. That is basically all he can >>> >> >> I think that a lot of people haven't actually watched or listened to his >> speeches this year. After all, he is a successful business man that the >> chimp ever was (G.W. Bush). >> I think he knows how they work. Hillary has already said she knows >> little of computers. > > Getting a huge loan from your daddy and then handling it less well than > investing in the stock market does NOT make one a good businessman. > Wrong. How big of a loan did you think he gave his son? The fact that he turned a small loan into a huge profit is a good business man. > Nor does screwing over others and not caring one whit... which he basically > bragged about in the debate. He does not even care about looking like a > decent person. > Isn't that what Hillary was doing all along?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 16:49 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: You can't fix dead. |
| Message-ID | <57ec2cf8$0$31312$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #373077 |
On 9/27/2016 9:04 PM, Snit wrote: > On 9/27/16, 5:32 PM, in article nsf32d$7ue$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > >>>>> You don't send emails to the Mafia. >>>>> >>>> >>>> A better question here is how would Jeff know what Trump can and can't >>>> do with a computer? >>> >>> Well, he can certainly use it as a doorstep. That is basically all he can >>> >> >> I think that a lot of people haven't actually watched or listened to his >> speeches this year. After all, he is a successful business man that the >> chimp ever was (G.W. Bush). >> I think he knows how they work. Hillary has already said she knows >> little of computers. > > Getting a huge loan from your daddy and then handling it less well than > investing in the stock market does NOT make one a good businessman. > > Nor does screwing over others and not caring one whit... which he basically > bragged about in the debate. He does not even care about looking like a > decent person. "screwing over" was Hillary's claim. He said he wasn't happy with the work. Of course her Marxist view (by commie mommy) is basically "soak the rich" and of course. that if you do no work and then don't get paid for doing nothing, you've been cheated. What else would you expect from a government employee type. Hey, if you are the first state Dept to get an ambassador killed since the 1800s, you still deserve your salary, right? That's the leftist way.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 14:01 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: You can't fix dead. |
| Message-ID | <D4117DC6.7EC70%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #373252 |
On 9/28/16, 1:49 PM, in article 57ec2cf8$0$31312$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com, "benj" <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 9/27/2016 9:04 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 9/27/16, 5:32 PM, in article nsf32d$7ue$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> You don't send emails to the Mafia. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> A better question here is how would Jeff know what Trump can and can't >>>>> do with a computer? >>>> >>>> Well, he can certainly use it as a doorstep. That is basically all he can >>>> >>> >>> I think that a lot of people haven't actually watched or listened to his >>> speeches this year. After all, he is a successful business man that the >>> chimp ever was (G.W. Bush). >>> I think he knows how they work. Hillary has already said she knows >>> little of computers. >> >> Getting a huge loan from your daddy and then handling it less well than >> investing in the stock market does NOT make one a good businessman. >> >> Nor does screwing over others and not caring one whit... which he basically >> bragged about in the debate. He does not even care about looking like a >> decent person. > > "screwing over" was Hillary's claim. Trump did not even pretend to pay those who worked for him. He refused... and then used the building anyway. > He said he wasn't happy with the work. So if I stay at his hotels and am not happy I need not pay. Cool! We have NO evidence the work was in any way bad. None. > Of course her Marxist view (by commie mommy) is basically "soak the rich" and > of course. WTF? Not even relevant to the conversation. We are talking about keeping your obligations. > that if you do no work and then don't get paid for doing nothing, > you've been cheated. What else would you expect from a government employee > type. Hey, if you are the first state Dept to get an ambassador killed since > the 1800s, you still deserve your salary, right? That's the leftist way. > -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 10:57 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: You can't fix dead. |
| Message-ID | <nsjh4q$c48$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #373252 |
On 09/28/2016 02:49 PM, benj wrote: > On 9/27/2016 9:04 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 9/27/16, 5:32 PM, in article nsf32d$7ue$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> You don't send emails to the Mafia. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> A better question here is how would Jeff know what Trump can and can't >>>>> do with a computer? >>>> >>>> Well, he can certainly use it as a doorstep. That is basically all >>>> he can >>>> >>> >>> I think that a lot of people haven't actually watched or listened to his >>> speeches this year. After all, he is a successful business man that the >>> chimp ever was (G.W. Bush). >>> I think he knows how they work. Hillary has already said she knows >>> little of computers. >> >> Getting a huge loan from your daddy and then handling it less well than >> investing in the stock market does NOT make one a good businessman. >> >> Nor does screwing over others and not caring one whit... which he >> basically >> bragged about in the debate. He does not even care about looking like a >> decent person. > > "screwing over" was Hillary's claim. He said he wasn't happy with the > work. Of course her Marxist view (by commie mommy) is basically "soak > the rich" and of course. that if you do no work and then don't get paid > for doing nothing, you've been cheated. What else would you expect from > a government employee type. Hey, if you are the first state Dept to get > an ambassador killed since the 1800s, you still deserve your salary, > right? That's the leftist way. > LOL!!! It sure is. I'm starting to think that Hillary enjoys watching people get killed. After all, she did say "I can't help it if people are dieing around me." She's been schooled by Saul Alinsky, a known communist inside of a University no less. As one Nun said "Give me your children and they'll stay catholic for the rest of their lives".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web