Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #450897 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-08 14:53 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-05-09 14:36 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 40 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Where do you fall on the political spectrum ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-08 14:53 -0700
Re: Where do you fall on the political spectrum ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 15:29 -0700
Re: Where do you fall on the political spectrum ? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 18:40 -0400
Re: Where do you fall on the political spectrum ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 15:43 -0700
Re: Where do you fall on the political spectrum ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 00:00 -0700
I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-08 18:18 -0700
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:09 -0400
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 19:55 -0700
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-05-09 11:12 -0500
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 06:47 -0700
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 03:07 -0700
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-09 07:53 -0400
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:26 -0500
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 10:40 -0400
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 08:24 -0700
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-09 16:15 +0000
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 12:10 -0500
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 10:12 -0700
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-09 18:27 -0400
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 06:52 -0500
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-10 11:53 -0400
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 09:05 -0700
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 09:31 -0700
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 09:37 -0700
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 09:50 -0700
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 09:51 -0700
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 10:10 -0700
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-10 16:49 +0000
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 12:27 -0500
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 10:39 -0700
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 10:57 -0700
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 10:56 -0700
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-10 17:56 +0000
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 10:58 -0700
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 08:21 -0700
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-09 18:05 -0400
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-05-09 18:49 -0400
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-09 07:46 -0400
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 08:01 -0700
Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-09 14:36 -0700
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 11:53 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <llq8fdpggvfmmtf4qqr5kc1il6l5v2jr0u@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #451018 |
On Thu, 10 May 2018 06:52:26 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >Doomsdrzej wrote: > >>She thought that her skin colour exempted her from all criminal >>actions. > >Did she really think that? From the way that she behaved after the fact, it's pretty clear to anyone listening to her that she believes it unfair or racist for a black person to be punished in the same way a white person would for the same crime.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 09:05 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <flj8thFkmseU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451018 |
On 5/10/18 4:52 AM, chrisv wrote: > Doomsdrzej wrote: > >> She thought that her skin colour exempted her from all criminal >> actions. > > Did she really think that? > I do not even know who he means, but of course not. And of course he thinks his skin color SHOULD lead to special entitlements. And his religion. He just likes to play victim. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 09:31 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <ba8c265d-d47c-40d7-b6a3-e521a5bef9d6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451039 |
On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 10:05:08 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/10/18 4:52 AM, chrisv wrote: > > Doomsdrzej wrote: > > > >> She thought that her skin colour exempted her from all criminal > >> actions. > > > > Did she really think that? > > > I do not even know who he means LOL! Don't you think it may have made sense to watch it *before* you commented? >, but of course not. While I disagree with his reasoning behind the posting of this... She's clearly playing the race card to her video audience, and doing so for being treated exactly how I've been treated when I said I wouldn't sign a ticket (in fact, this cop was *much* nicer). Like you, she suffers from delusions, she believes that she has a "right" of refusal. She certainly can choose to refuse but there is no "right", she'll pay a penalty for refusing because she has a driver's license; this means she's 'opted in' to all the rules and regulations the State imposes via your agreement with them. Her second delusion was believing she could try the case right there, a thing that undoubtedly irked the cop (who kept his composure all throughout).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 09:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <fljaqcFkujbU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451047 |
On 5/10/18 9:31 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 10:05:08 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 5/10/18 4:52 AM, chrisv wrote: >>> Doomsdrzej wrote: >>> >>>> She thought that her skin colour exempted her from all criminal >>>> actions. >>> >>> Did she really think that? >>> >> I do not even know who he means > > LOL! Don't you think it may have made sense to watch it *before* > you commented? > >> , but of course not. > > While I disagree with his reasoning behind the posting of this... > > She's clearly playing the race card to her video audience, and > doing so for being treated exactly how I've been treated when > I said I wouldn't sign a ticket (in fact, this cop was *much* nicer). Open to evidence. > Like you, she suffers from delusions, Once again you change the topic to being about your delusions of me. You only think of life in terms of me. You obsess over me. ... There is more to life than me, Carroll. Listen to your family. Heck, listen to your own warning from 2004 or whatever when you said such online nonsense can lead to families breaking apart... yours did. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 09:50 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <520e56e9-ddfd-4428-8bfb-f39964832bbf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451051 |
On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 9:37:35 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 5/10/18 9:31 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 10:05:08 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 5/10/18 4:52 AM, chrisv wrote: > >>> Doomsdrzej wrote: > >>> > >>>> She thought that her skin colour exempted her from all criminal > >>>> actions. > >>> > >>> Did she really think that? > >>> > >> I do not even know who he means > > > > LOL! Don't you think it may have made sense to watch it *before* > > you commented? > > > >> , but of course not. > > > > While I disagree with his reasoning behind the posting of this... > > > > She's clearly playing the race card to her video audience, and > > doing so for being treated exactly how I've been treated when > > I said I wouldn't sign a ticket (in fact, this cop was *much* nicer). > > Open to evidence. > > > Like you, she suffers from delusions, > > Once again you change the topic to being about your delusions of me. You > only think of life in terms of me. You obsess over me. > > ... > > There is more to life than me, Carroll. Listen to your family. Heck, > listen to your own warning from 2004 or whatever when you said such > online nonsense can lead to families breaking apart... yours did. > > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> Right, James Kuyper is pushing to market an API reference, which The Doctor can get in seconds, that does simple recursion. If he wasn't so screwed up he'd figure out how clueless he looks. He makes false accusation to an entire group of people who are mere civilians, but that's a stuck up jerk for you. What you and I care about isn't a factor. It is obvious this is an insomniac troll writing because some of them are direct responses in very specific ways which proves they are a response. IOW, while some could be automated others are definitely not. It's a decades long story, and James Kuyper is simultaneously an expert bullshiter of trolling remarks, while posting with socks with a myriad of tells. - This broke the Internet https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLU_evUKollmjeuJy5V5UMotPUs65Q7YM6 Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 09:51 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <ec63a40e-da59-4baf-b95c-9ad889bf8459@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451051 |
On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 10:37:35 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/10/18 9:31 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 10:05:08 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 5/10/18 4:52 AM, chrisv wrote: > >>> Doomsdrzej wrote: > >>> > >>>> She thought that her skin colour exempted her from all criminal > >>>> actions. > >>> > >>> Did she really think that? > >>> > >> I do not even know who he means > > > > LOL! Don't you think it may have made sense to watch it *before* > > you commented? > > > >> , but of course not. > > > > While I disagree with his reasoning behind the posting of this... > > > > She's clearly playing the race card to her video audience, and > > doing so for being treated exactly how I've been treated when > > I said I wouldn't sign a ticket (in fact, this cop was *much* nicer). > > Open to evidence. LOL! You're confused, "Open" means you would have refrained from comment until *after* you saw the evidence. You already replied to a poster *as* you admitted you hadn't seen it. You're high as a kite, arencha?;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 10:10 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <fljcndFlj6qU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451057 |
On 5/10/18 9:31 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 10:05:08 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 5/10/18 4:52 AM, chrisv wrote: >>> Doomsdrzej wrote: >>> >>>> She thought that her skin colour exempted her from all criminal >>>> actions. >>> >>> Did she really think that? >>> >> I do not even know who he means > > LOL! Don't you think it may have made sense to watch it *before* > you commented? > >> , but of course not. > > While I disagree with his reasoning behind the posting of this... > > She's clearly playing the race card to her video audience, and > doing so for being treated exactly how I've been treated when > I said I wouldn't sign a ticket (in fact, this cop was *much* nicer). Open to evidence. > Like you, she suffers from delusions, Once again you change the topic to being about your delusions of me. You only think of life in terms of me. You obsess over me. ... There is more to life than me, Carroll. Listen to your family. Heck, listen to your own warning from 2004 or whatever when you said such online nonsense can lead to families breaking apart... yours did. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 16:49 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <gy9b8983g.ayu@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #451047 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 10:05:08 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 5/10/18 4:52 AM, chrisv wrote: >> > Doomsdrzej wrote: >> > >> >> She thought that her skin colour exempted her from all criminal >> >> actions. >> > >> > Did she really think that? >> > >> I do not even know who he means > > LOL! Don't you think it may have made sense to watch it *before* > you commented? > >>, but of course not. > > While I disagree with his reasoning behind the posting of this... > > She's clearly playing the race card to her video audience, and > doing so for being treated exactly how I've been treated when > I said I wouldn't sign a ticket (in fact, this cop was *much* nicer). > Are you kidding, the cop almost lynched her right there. > Like you, she suffers from delusions, she believes that she has a > "right" of refusal. She certainly can choose to refuse but there is > no "right", she'll pay a penalty for refusing because she has a > driver's license; this means she's 'opted in' to all the rules and > regulations the State imposes via your agreement with them. > Her second delusion was believing she could try the case right > there, a thing that undoubtedly irked the cop (who kept his > composure all throughout). > You white privilege blinds you to the struggles that African Americans have had to suffer in the last couple of decades.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 12:27 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <jpu8fd94cbvtl0huishllcvjslqv8njr17@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #451055 |
owl wrote: > Steve Carroll wrote: >> >> She's clearly playing the race card to her video audience, and >> doing so for being treated exactly how I've been treated when >> I said I wouldn't sign a ticket (in fact, this cop was *much* nicer). > > (idiocy snipped) > >> Like you, she suffers from delusions, she believes that she has a >> "right" of refusal. She certainly can choose to refuse but there is >> no "right", she'll pay a penalty for refusing because she has a >> driver's license; this means she's 'opted in' to all the rules and >> regulations the State imposes via your agreement with them. >> Her second delusion was believing she could try the case right >> there, a thing that undoubtedly irked the cop (who kept his >> composure all throughout). > >You white privilege blinds you to the struggles that African Americans >have had to suffer in the last couple of decades. Something blinded owl, that's for sure. While I understand that he hopes to recruit only a few dullards and bigots with his right-wing propaganda, the recruits would have to be *incredibly* stupid to be convinced of anything by a video of a black person behaving badly. After all, everyone knows that some white people also behave badly, and that cops often do treat blacks worse than they do whites. Cue the "no they don't" denial of the truth, from the right-winger. -- 'The "advocates" said (ARM snapdragon mini computers) would replace desktops.' - Hadron Quark, lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 10:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <d310e8cf-b214-40b5-b118-595238aa0ba4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451065 |
On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 11:27:48 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote: > owl wrote: > > > Steve Carroll wrote: > >> > >> She's clearly playing the race card to her video audience, and > >> doing so for being treated exactly how I've been treated when > >> I said I wouldn't sign a ticket (in fact, this cop was *much* nicer). > > > > (idiocy snipped) > > > >> Like you, she suffers from delusions, she believes that she has a > >> "right" of refusal. She certainly can choose to refuse but there is > >> no "right", she'll pay a penalty for refusing because she has a > >> driver's license; this means she's 'opted in' to all the rules and > >> regulations the State imposes via your agreement with them. > >> Her second delusion was believing she could try the case right > >> there, a thing that undoubtedly irked the cop (who kept his > >> composure all throughout). > > > >You white privilege blinds you to the struggles that African Americans > >have had to suffer in the last couple of decades. > > Something blinded owl, that's for sure. > > While I understand that he hopes to recruit only a few dullards and > bigots with his right-wing propaganda, the recruits would have to be > *incredibly* stupid to be convinced of anything by a video of a black > person behaving badly. > > After all, everyone knows that some white people also behave badly, > and that cops often do treat blacks worse than they do whites. Sure, and when it's legit, pointing it out and getting justice is the right thing to do. When it isn't legit you're into 'HWSNBN' territory, which can only hurt those seeking redress of actual grievances in the public's eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 10:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <fljfgeFm74vU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451067 |
On 5/10/18 10:39 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 11:27:48 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote: >> owl wrote: >> >>> Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> >>>> She's clearly playing the race card to her video audience, and >>>> doing so for being treated exactly how I've been treated when >>>> I said I wouldn't sign a ticket (in fact, this cop was *much* nicer). >>> >>> (idiocy snipped) >>> >>>> Like you, she suffers from delusions, she believes that she has a >>>> "right" of refusal. She certainly can choose to refuse but there is >>>> no "right", she'll pay a penalty for refusing because she has a >>>> driver's license; this means she's 'opted in' to all the rules and >>>> regulations the State imposes via your agreement with them. >>>> Her second delusion was believing she could try the case right >>>> there, a thing that undoubtedly irked the cop (who kept his >>>> composure all throughout). >>> >>> You white privilege blinds you to the struggles that African Americans >>> have had to suffer in the last couple of decades. >> >> Something blinded owl, that's for sure. >> >> While I understand that he hopes to recruit only a few dullards and >> bigots with his right-wing propaganda, the recruits would have to be >> *incredibly* stupid to be convinced of anything by a video of a black >> person behaving badly. >> >> After all, everyone knows that some white people also behave badly, >> and that cops often do treat blacks worse than they do whites. > > Sure, and when it's legit, pointing it out and getting justice is the right > thing to do. When it isn't legit you're into 'HWSNBN' territory, which can > only hurt those seeking redress of actual grievances in the public's eye. > For Carroll's family members who are reading: When he speaks of "HWSNBN" he means "He who shall not be named", one of his many names for me. He is, again, obsessing over me. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 10:56 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <fljfdnFm74vU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451065 |
On 5/10/18 10:27 AM, chrisv wrote: > owl wrote: > >> Steve Carroll wrote: >>> >>> She's clearly playing the race card to her video audience, and >>> doing so for being treated exactly how I've been treated when >>> I said I wouldn't sign a ticket (in fact, this cop was *much* nicer). >> >> (idiocy snipped) >> >>> Like you, she suffers from delusions, she believes that she has a >>> "right" of refusal. She certainly can choose to refuse but there is >>> no "right", she'll pay a penalty for refusing because she has a >>> driver's license; this means she's 'opted in' to all the rules and >>> regulations the State imposes via your agreement with them. >>> Her second delusion was believing she could try the case right >>> there, a thing that undoubtedly irked the cop (who kept his >>> composure all throughout). >> >> You white privilege blinds you to the struggles that African Americans >> have had to suffer in the last couple of decades. > > Something blinded owl, that's for sure. Without following the thread at all, his bigotry, victim mentality, and rejection of equal rights blinds him repeatedly. > While I understand that he hopes to recruit only a few dullards and > bigots with his right-wing propaganda, the recruits would have to be > *incredibly* stupid to be convinced of anything by a video of a black > person behaving badly. > > After all, everyone knows that some white people also behave badly, > and that cops often do treat blacks worse than they do whites. > > Cue the "no they don't" denial of the truth, from the right-winger. His arguments are to hand select examples that feed into his bias. He then rejects the actual studies. <https://www.icloud.com/pages/0OxJ9LmqU3lZI9p0TBEFkbkBQ> -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 17:56 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <9as0b8803a.h@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #451065 |
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > owl wrote: > >> Steve Carroll wrote: >>> >>> She's clearly playing the race card to her video audience, and >>> doing so for being treated exactly how I've been treated when >>> I said I wouldn't sign a ticket (in fact, this cop was *much* nicer). >> >> (idiocy snipped) >> >>> Like you, she suffers from delusions, she believes that she has a >>> "right" of refusal. She certainly can choose to refuse but there is >>> no "right", she'll pay a penalty for refusing because she has a >>> driver's license; this means she's 'opted in' to all the rules and >>> regulations the State imposes via your agreement with them. >>> Her second delusion was believing she could try the case right >>> there, a thing that undoubtedly irked the cop (who kept his >>> composure all throughout). >> >>You white privilege blinds you to the struggles that African Americans >>have had to suffer in the last couple of decades. > > Something blinded owl, that's for sure. > > While I understand that he hopes to recruit only a few dullards and > bigots with his right-wing propaganda, the recruits would have to be > *incredibly* stupid to be convinced of anything by a video of a black > person behaving badly. > > After all, everyone knows that some white people also behave badly, > and that cops often do treat blacks worse than they do whites. > > Cue the "no they don't" denial of the truth, from the right-winger. > Setting aside the question of criminal tendencies, blacks get into more trouble with the cops than whites primarily because they seem to have trouble with authority, and their behavior usually ranges from not complying with instructions to flat out resisting arrest. If Mike Brown's first choice had been "hands up don't shoot" instead of trying to grab the cop's gun, he would still be alive today.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 10:58 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <fljfhkFm74vU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451070 |
On 5/10/18 10:56 AM, owl wrote: > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> owl wrote: >> >>> Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> >>>> She's clearly playing the race card to her video audience, and >>>> doing so for being treated exactly how I've been treated when >>>> I said I wouldn't sign a ticket (in fact, this cop was *much* nicer). >>> >>> (idiocy snipped) >>> >>>> Like you, she suffers from delusions, she believes that she has a >>>> "right" of refusal. She certainly can choose to refuse but there is >>>> no "right", she'll pay a penalty for refusing because she has a >>>> driver's license; this means she's 'opted in' to all the rules and >>>> regulations the State imposes via your agreement with them. >>>> Her second delusion was believing she could try the case right >>>> there, a thing that undoubtedly irked the cop (who kept his >>>> composure all throughout). >>> >>> You white privilege blinds you to the struggles that African Americans >>> have had to suffer in the last couple of decades. >> >> Something blinded owl, that's for sure. >> >> While I understand that he hopes to recruit only a few dullards and >> bigots with his right-wing propaganda, the recruits would have to be >> *incredibly* stupid to be convinced of anything by a video of a black >> person behaving badly. >> >> After all, everyone knows that some white people also behave badly, >> and that cops often do treat blacks worse than they do whites. >> >> Cue the "no they don't" denial of the truth, from the right-winger. >> > > Setting aside the question of criminal tendencies, blacks get into > more trouble with the cops than whites primarily because they seem to > have trouble with authority, and their behavior usually ranges from > not complying with instructions to flat out resisting arrest. If Mike > Brown's first choice had been "hands up don't shoot" instead of trying > to grab the cop's gun, he would still be alive today. > <https://www.icloud.com/pages/0OxJ9LmqU3lZI9p0TBEFkbkBQ> You could, if you wanted, actually research and learn about the topic you are speaking about. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 08:21 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <flgi0mF265sU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #450929 |
On 5/9/18 5:26 AM, chrisv wrote: > Doomsdrzej wrote: > >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> >>> Even though Democrats were the inventors of >>> jim Crow, KKK, segregation, lynching etc. and republicans were the >>> abolitionists etc. Through diligent lying today all unthinking people >>> think that Republicans are all racists and democrats all craving freedom >>> and diversity. Simply Amazing work! >> >> The Democrats and liberals in general want to erase all of their >> history and therefore the evidence that they were the most violently >> racist people around. Hell, don't take my word for it: >> >> <https://clashdaily.com/2014/03/allen-west-lbj-ill-nggers-voting-democratic-next-200-years/> > > Does it really matter what labels were used, a hundred years ago? > > What's important is what living people are thinking and doing. > > You and owl are thinking badly. > They are also confusing Democrat / Republican with liberal / conservative. While there is a fair amount of truth to that NOW, this has not been the case over history. The South, for example, used to be strongly Democrat. When the Republicans started to back their racist views more, and the Democrats less, they switched to being Republicans. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 18:05 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <62s6fd1liuqujptoaq647rsdlfo361cgee@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #450929 |
On Wed, 09 May 2018 07:26:37 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >Doomsdrzej wrote: > >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> >>> Even though Democrats were the inventors of >>>jim Crow, KKK, segregation, lynching etc. and republicans were the >>>abolitionists etc. Through diligent lying today all unthinking people >>>think that Republicans are all racists and democrats all craving freedom >>>and diversity. Simply Amazing work! >> >>The Democrats and liberals in general want to erase all of their >>history and therefore the evidence that they were the most violently >>racist people around. Hell, don't take my word for it: >> >><https://clashdaily.com/2014/03/allen-west-lbj-ill-nggers-voting-democratic-next-200-years/> > >Does it really matter what labels were used, a hundred years ago? First of all, Lyndon Johnson didn't live a hundred years ago. >What's important is what living people are thinking and doing. > >You and owl are thinking badly. You might be right: I'll have to start watching Rachel Maddow and Anderson Cooper so they can tell me what to think.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@volney.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 18:49 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <pcvtv8$4c5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #450977 |
On 5/9/2018 6:05 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > On Wed, 09 May 2018 07:26:37 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> > wrote: > >> Doomsdrzej wrote: >>> <https://clashdaily.com/2014/03/allen-west-lbj-ill-nggers-voting-democratic-next-200-years/> >> >> Does it really matter what labels were used, a hundred years ago? > > First of all, Lyndon Johnson didn't live a hundred years ago. Actually he did. He was 10 years old a hundred years ago (born 1908). Yes his fame was more like 55 years ago, of course.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 07:46 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <pnn5fd57kgs0p20di6hciqg65usc12fh45@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #450902 |
On Tue, 08 May 2018 18:18:48 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: >Andrzej Matuch replied ( to me ): >> > GoToQuiz.COM/politics/political-spectrum-quiz.html >> > I'm off the charts, FarRight; Libertarian. >> >> This is me: kek.gg/i/79G97X.png Dead centre > >Wow ! I thought you were right of me, not dead center. > >I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. I'm barely authoritarian. I believe that there should be laws against certain things (gay marriage and abortion) and that the mainstream media should be fined for inappropriate language and content (especially since their airwaves are available free of charge to everyone) but otherwise, I don't give much of a hoot. My province would benefit from such laws, to be honest. There's a clear downward trend in terms of morality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 08:01 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <flggq9F1rh3U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #450922 |
On 5/9/18 4:46 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > On Tue, 08 May 2018 18:18:48 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: > >> Andrzej Matuch replied ( to me ): >>>> GoToQuiz.COM/politics/political-spectrum-quiz.html >>>> I'm off the charts, FarRight; Libertarian. >>> >>> This is me: kek.gg/i/79G97X.png Dead centre >> >> Wow ! I thought you were right of me, not dead center. >> >> I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. > > I'm barely authoritarian. I believe that there should be laws against > certain things (gay marriage and abortion) and that the mainstream > media should be fined for inappropriate language and content > (especially since their airwaves are available free of charge to > everyone) but otherwise, I don't give much of a hoot. You want to control what people do in their private lives and with their bodies, and you want to limit free speech. That makes you more than just a "little" authoritarian. > My province would benefit from such laws, to be honest. There's a > clear downward trend in terms of morality. > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 14:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I confuse "authoritarianism" with the right wing. |
| Message-ID | <2dc6d811-dff0-45fe-8fc0-73c706fbb739@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #450922 |
Doomsdrzej wrote: > I'm barely authoritarian. “Barely”, where your Authoritarian score is more than double of the highest of my scores. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web