Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #243070 > unrolled thread

Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations

Started bySteve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com>
First post2014-05-11 18:49 -0700
Last post2014-05-12 08:52 -0700
Articles 17 on this page of 77 — 14 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-11 18:49 -0700
    Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 03:54 +0200
      Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-11 19:29 -0700
        Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 02:35 -0700
          Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-12 11:47 +0000
            Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:02 +0200
              Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
              Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 09:29 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 12:48 -0400
                  Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:27 -0700
                    Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:50 -0700
                    Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 11:05 -0700
                  Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 16:26 -0400
                    Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 13:31 -0700
                    Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:01 -0700
                      Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:56 -0600
                        Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:21 -0700
                          Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 17:11 -0600
                            Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:19 -0700
                            Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:52 -0700
                              Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2014-05-12 20:54 -0600
                                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 20:05 -0700
                        Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 18:58 -0400
                          Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:22 -0700
                    Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:14 -0600
                      Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:12 -0400
                        Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:18 -0700
                        Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:50 -0700
                    Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 14:45 +0200
                  Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:26 -0700
            Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
            Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 10:21 -0600
              Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 12:45 -0400
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:02 -0700
                  Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:36 -0700
                    Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:57 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:09 -0700
                  Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:57 -0600
                    Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:06 -0700
                    Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 19:00 -0400
                      Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 17:13 -0600
                        Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:19 -0700
                        Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 20:50 -0400
                        Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 20:52 -0400
                          Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:57 -0700
                          Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 18:08 -0700
                          Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2014-05-12 20:57 -0600
                            Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 20:32 -0700
                        Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 20:00 -0700
                          Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 07:57 -0700
                      Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:22 -0700
                      Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:36 -0700
                        Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:48 -0700
                    Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:16 -0700
                      Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 18:08 -0700
                      Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 10:22 -0700
                      Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 11:29 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 11:34 -0600
                  Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:36 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-12 23:04 +0000
                  Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:23 -0700
                  Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-13 10:57 +0100
                    Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-13 13:28 +0200
                      Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-13 12:59 +0100
                        Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-13 15:24 +0200
                          Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
                            Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:43 -0700
                        Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 15:39 +0200
                          Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 15:42 +0200
                            Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
                          Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
                    Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:14 -0400
                      Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
                        Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:42 -0700
                    Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
          Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
      Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:52 -0700

Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]

#243267

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-12 16:23 -0700
Message-ID<CF96A603.371B0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243252
On 5/12/14, 4:04 PM, in article XnsA32BC20273AE6tattoovampire@178.63.61.145,
"Tattoo Vampire" <sitting@this.computer> wrote:

> Silver Slimer wrote:
> 
>> I can already imagine some of the chapter titles; Chapter 5: GNU/Linux
>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 11: GNU/Linux STILL
>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 17: It's silly that
>> GNU/Linux doesn't have screencasting applications.
> 
> Chapter 3,649: I, I, I, Me, Me, Me

You guys cannot find flaw with me, so you make things up.

Funny.


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243344

FromWilliam Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net>
Date2014-05-13 10:57 +0100
Message-ID<8t694b-mo4.ln1@myhost.linuxnetworkbeta.net>
In reply to#243252
Tattoo Vampire wrote:

> Silver Slimer wrote:
>
>> I can already imagine some of the chapter titles; Chapter 5: GNU/Linux
>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 11: GNU/Linux STILL
>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 17: It's silly that
>> GNU/Linux doesn't have screencasting applications.
>
> Chapter 3,649: I, I, I, Me, Me, Me

RecordMyDesktop, Istanbul, xvidcap.

-- 
So much for Windwoes AV:
Antivirus products were developed to keep hackers out, but in today’s world, 
Symantec only keeps about 45 percent of attempted breaches from ever making it inside.
http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/1113140089/antivirus-software-dead-technology-brian-dye-symantec-050714/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243350

FromPeter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Date2014-05-13 13:28 +0200
Message-ID<lksvlr$758$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#243344
William Poaster wrote:

> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> 
>> Silver Slimer wrote:
>>
>>> I can already imagine some of the chapter titles; Chapter 5: GNU/Linux
>>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 11: GNU/Linux STILL
>>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 17: It's silly that
>>> GNU/Linux doesn't have screencasting applications.
>>
>> Chapter 3,649: I, I, I, Me, Me, Me
> 
> RecordMyDesktop, Istanbul, xvidcap.
> 

There are more. Also more capable ones.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243353

FromWilliam Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net>
Date2014-05-13 12:59 +0100
Message-ID<p2e94b-9h7.ln1@myhost.linuxnetworkbeta.net>
In reply to#243350
Peter Köhlmann wrote:

> William Poaster wrote:
>
>> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>> 
>>> Silver Slimer wrote:
>>>
>>>> I can already imagine some of the chapter titles; Chapter 5: GNU/Linux
>>>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 11: GNU/Linux STILL
>>>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 17: It's silly that
>>>> GNU/Linux doesn't have screencasting applications.
>>>
>>> Chapter 3,649: I, I, I, Me, Me, Me
>> 
>> RecordMyDesktop, Istanbul, xvidcap.
>> 
>
> There are more. Also more capable ones. 

No doubt, Peter, they are just the ones I thought of "off the top of my
head".

-- 
So much for Windwoes AV:
Antivirus products were developed to keep hackers out, but in today’s world, 
Symantec only keeps about 45 percent of attempted breaches from ever making it inside.
http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/1113140089/antivirus-software-dead-technology-brian-dye-symantec-050714/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243363

FromPeter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Date2014-05-13 15:24 +0200
Message-ID<lkt6ek$qdl$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#243353
William Poaster wrote:

> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> 
>> William Poaster wrote:
>>
>>> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Silver Slimer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I can already imagine some of the chapter titles; Chapter 5: GNU/Linux
>>>>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 11: GNU/Linux STILL
>>>>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 17: It's silly that
>>>>> GNU/Linux doesn't have screencasting applications.
>>>>
>>>> Chapter 3,649: I, I, I, Me, Me, Me
>>> 
>>> RecordMyDesktop, Istanbul, xvidcap.
>>> 
>>
>> There are more. Also more capable ones.
> 
> No doubt, Peter, they are just the ones I thought of "off the top of my
> head".
> 

They are fine enough for at least 90% of the tasks where you would need 
screencasting software. In the past I have used both RecordMyDesktop and  
Istanbul. Since some years I mostly run "RecordItNow" for the occasional 
need to do screencasting. I prefer its simplicity while at the same time it 
provides nearly everything I would need. I actually don't like software 
which tries to be everything when you can get the same result with the 
combination of simple tools. There is screencasting software which can do 
more then "RecordItNow" but for that one case in hundreds of years where it 
would not be "good enough" they can make that software better, until I think 
that its advantages outweight the disadvantages

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243384

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Message-ID<CF978426.37275%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243363
On 5/13/14, 6:24 AM, in article lkt6ek$qdl$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann"
<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:

>>>> RecordMyDesktop, Istanbul, xvidcap.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> There are more. Also more capable ones.
>> 
>> No doubt, Peter, they are just the ones I thought of "off the top of my
>> head".
>> 
> 
> They are fine enough for at least 90% of the tasks where you would need
> screencasting software.

Maybe the tasks you need - but not me! But even if they were, that does not
change the fact that your past claims on the topic have been flat out wrong:

---------------------------------------------------------------

  Snit: 
    ----- 
    Excellent screencasting software, similar to ScreenFlow.  And
    example of something I find key to its use:
    <http://youtu.be/To4v70huwAU>.  What OSS tool on desktop Linux
    has anything even close?
    ----- 
  Peter Köhlmann: 
    ----- 
    There are several more. Look up "Istanbul" for example or
    "Byzanz", or "Cankiri" The list can grow quite a bit, but
    these are the most used ones
    ----- 
No program Peter pointed to does the task shown in the video. Peter
never found *any* way on desktop Linux.

Message-ID: <jkpf9p$545$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/cLC0Mo>

---------------------------------------------------------------

  Peter Köhlmann: 
    -----
    In fact, there are at least 3 programs for screencasting which do
    either without exception *all* he "needs" or can do it combined
    with others
    -----
    | You have spoken of three programs.
    No, I have not. Your incredibly bad reading comprehension is
    rearing its ugly head again,
    -----
Both of those quotes come from the same day and the same thread and were
stated in that order. In another thread on a previous day Peter gave the
names of three screen recording programs: Istanbul, Byzanz, and Cankiri
    
Message ID: <l9scpl$fig$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/Q85TGT>
Message ID: <l9spoa$5qn$2@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/o6vJcb>
Message-ID: <jkpf9p$545$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/cLC0Mo>

---------------------------------------------------------------

> In the past I have used both RecordMyDesktop and  Istanbul. Since some years I
> mostly run "RecordItNow" for the occasional need to do screencasting. I prefer
> its simplicity while at the same time it provides nearly everything I would
> need. I actually don't like software which tries to be everything when you can
> get the same result with the combination of simple tools.

As you have been told, though, there is no combination of tools you can use
where you record with one tool and it passes on information about window
placement, keystrokes, mouse clicks, mouse movement, etc. so you can show or
hide these things as you wish in your video editor.

You, of course, claim to have secret Voldermort software that does just
this! The problem, however, is none of the screen recorders for Linux export
with any format that has these features. None I can find nor none you can
name.

And then there is the problem that done of the video editors have tools to
work with this information even it was exported.

Meaning you are simply wrong. Again.

> There is screencasting software which can do more then "RecordItNow" but for
> that one case in hundreds of years where it would not be "good enough" they
> can make that software better, until I think that its advantages outweight the
> disadvantages

You know nothing of screencasting. Fine. I am not going to claim you do.

-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243402

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2014-05-13 08:43 -0700
Message-ID<a73c2bc6-54a2-4103-8a4a-6d2c95f45a4b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#243384
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 3:11:18 PM UTC, Snit wrote:
> On 5/13/14, 6:24 AM, in article lkt6ek$qdl$1@dont-email.me, "Peter K�hlmann"
> 
> <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> >>>> RecordMyDesktop, Istanbul, xvidcap.
> 
> >>>> 
> 
> >>> 
> 
> >>> There are more. Also more capable ones.
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> No doubt, Peter, they are just the ones I thought of "off the top of my
> 
> >> head".
> 
> >> 
> 
> > 
> 
> > They are fine enough for at least 90% of the tasks where you would need
> 
> > screencasting software.
> 
> 
> 
> Maybe the tasks you need - but not me! But even if they were, that does not
> 
> change the fact that your past claims on the topic have been flat out wrong:
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
>   Snit: 
> 
>     ----- 
> 
>     Excellent screencasting software, similar to ScreenFlow.  And
> 
>     example of something I find key to its use:
> 
>     <http://youtu.be/To4v70huwAU>.  What OSS tool on desktop Linux
> 
>     has anything even close?
> 
>     ----- 
> 
>   Peter K�hlmann: 
> 
>     ----- 
> 
>     There are several more. Look up "Istanbul" for example or
> 
>     "Byzanz", or "Cankiri" The list can grow quite a bit, but
> 
>     these are the most used ones
> 
>     ----- 
> 
> No program Peter pointed to does the task shown in the video. Peter
> 
> never found *any* way on desktop Linux.
> 
> 
> 
> Message-ID: <jkpf9p$545$1@dont-email.me>
> 
> <http://goo.gl/cLC0Mo>
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
>   Peter K�hlmann: 
> 
>     -----
> 
>     In fact, there are at least 3 programs for screencasting which do
> 
>     either without exception *all* he "needs" or can do it combined
> 
>     with others
> 
>     -----
> 
>     | You have spoken of three programs.
> 
>     No, I have not. Your incredibly bad reading comprehension is
> 
>     rearing its ugly head again,
> 
>     -----
> 
> Both of those quotes come from the same day and the same thread and were
> 
> stated in that order. In another thread on a previous day Peter gave the
> 
> names of three screen recording programs: Istanbul, Byzanz, and Cankiri
> 
>     
> 
> Message ID: <l9scpl$fig$1@dont-email.me>
> 
> <http://goo.gl/Q85TGT>
> 
> Message ID: <l9spoa$5qn$2@dont-email.me>
> 
> <http://goo.gl/o6vJcb>
> 
> Message-ID: <jkpf9p$545$1@dont-email.me>
> 
> <http://goo.gl/cLC0Mo>
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> > In the past I have used both RecordMyDesktop and  Istanbul. Since some years I
> 
> > mostly run "RecordItNow" for the occasional need to do screencasting. I prefer
> 
> > its simplicity while at the same time it provides nearly everything I would
> 
> > need. I actually don't like software which tries to be everything when you can
> 
> > get the same result with the combination of simple tools.
> 
> 
> 
> As you have been told, though, there is no combination of tools you can use
> 
> where you record with one tool and it passes on information about window
> 
> placement, keystrokes, mouse clicks, mouse movement, etc. so you can show or
> 
> hide these things as you wish in your video editor.
> 
> 
> 
> You, of course, claim to have secret Voldermort software that does just
> 
> this! The problem, however, is none of the screen recorders for Linux export
> 
> with any format that has these features. None I can find nor none you can
> 
> name.
> 
> 
> 
> And then there is the problem that done of the video editors have tools to
> 
> work with this information even it was exported.
> 
> 
> 
> Meaning you are simply wrong. Again.
> 
> 
> 
> > There is screencasting software which can do more then "RecordItNow" but for
> 
> > that one case in hundreds of years where it would not be "good enough" they
> 
> > can make that software better, until I think that its advantages outweight the
> 
> > disadvantages
> 
> 
> 
> You know nothing of screencasting. Fine. I am not going to claim you do.
> 
In this very thread you keep insisting nobody is denying there is such software. You must have had a very good vat of glue today.
> 
> -- 
> 
> * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
> 
> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
> 
> * Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
> 
> * Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
> 
> * Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
> 
> * Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
> 
> * Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
> 
> * Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
> 
> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

Another forum ruined by 
Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy of Prescott, Arizona 86301 
http://prescottcomputerguy.com 
The best website design in Prescott, AZ is shown at his own site 
http://prescottcomputerguy.com/web-design.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243364

Fromtinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid>
Date2014-05-13 15:39 +0200
Message-ID<lkt79m$k6t$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#243353
op 13-05-14 13:59, William Poaster schreef:

> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>
>> William Poaster wrote:
>>
>>> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>>>
>>>> Silver Slimer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I can already imagine some of the chapter titles; Chapter 5: GNU/Linux
>>>>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 11: GNU/Linux STILL
>>>>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 17: It's silly that
>>>>> GNU/Linux doesn't have screencasting applications.
>>>>
>>>> Chapter 3,649: I, I, I, Me, Me, Me
>>>
>>> RecordMyDesktop, Istanbul, xvidcap.
>>>
>>
>> There are more. Also more capable ones.
>
> No doubt, Peter, they are just the ones I thought of "off the top of my
> head".
>
Simple Screen Recorder is also great. It's in the Ubuntu repositories 
now, so probably also on other distro's as well.

http://www.maartenbaert.be/simplescreenrecorder/

Just my two cents.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243365

Fromtinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid>
Date2014-05-13 15:42 +0200
Message-ID<lkt7h3$klb$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#243364
op 13-05-14 15:39, tinus61 schreef:

> op 13-05-14 13:59, William Poaster schreef:
>
>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>
>>> William Poaster wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Silver Slimer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I can already imagine some of the chapter titles; Chapter 5:
>>>>>> GNU/Linux
>>>>>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 11: GNU/Linux STILL
>>>>>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 17: It's silly that
>>>>>> GNU/Linux doesn't have screencasting applications.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chapter 3,649: I, I, I, Me, Me, Me
>>>>
>>>> RecordMyDesktop, Istanbul, xvidcap.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There are more. Also more capable ones.
>>
>> No doubt, Peter, they are just the ones I thought of "off the top of my
>> head".
>>
> Simple Screen Recorder is also great. It's in the Ubuntu repositories
> now, so probably also on other distro's as well.
>
> http://www.maartenbaert.be/simplescreenrecorder/
>
> Just my two cents.

Correction: it's not in the default Ubuntu repositories, it's available 
as a PPA.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243385

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Message-ID<CF97842A.37275%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243365
On 5/13/14, 6:42 AM, in article lkt7h3$klb$1@news.albasani.net, "tinus61"
<tinus61@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>>> No doubt, Peter, they are just the ones I thought of "off the top of my
>>> head".
>>> 
>> Simple Screen Recorder is also great. It's in the Ubuntu repositories
>> now, so probably also on other distro's as well.
>> 
>> http://www.maartenbaert.be/simplescreenrecorder/
>> 
>> Just my two cents.
> 
> Correction: it's not in the default Ubuntu repositories, it's available
> as a PPA.

There are screen recorders for Linux, but I do not think anyone has denied
this or even questioned it.


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243383

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Message-ID<CF978420.37275%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243364
On 5/13/14, 6:39 AM, in article lkt79m$k6t$1@news.albasani.net, "tinus61"
<tinus61@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>>> There are more. Also more capable ones.
>> 
>> No doubt, Peter, they are just the ones I thought of "off the top of my
>> head".
>> 
> Simple Screen Recorder is also great. It's in the Ubuntu repositories
> now, so probably also on other distro's as well.
> 
> http://www.maartenbaert.be/simplescreenrecorder/
> 
> Just my two cents.

There are many decent screen recorders for Linux. I do not think anyone has
suggested otherwise.


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243368

FromSilver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c>
Date2014-05-13 10:14 -0400
Message-ID<lkt9d3$cvp$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#243344
On 14-05-13 05:57 AM, William Poaster wrote:
> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> 
>> Silver Slimer wrote:
>>
>>> I can already imagine some of the chapter titles; Chapter 5: GNU/Linux
>>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 11: GNU/Linux STILL
>>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 17: It's silly that
>>> GNU/Linux doesn't have screencasting applications.
>>
>> Chapter 3,649: I, I, I, Me, Me, Me
> 
> RecordMyDesktop, Istanbul, xvidcap.

Of those, RecordMyDesktop seems to be the only one with good reviews.
However, it indeed seems that there are tools for the job.

-- 
Silver Slimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243387

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Message-ID<CF97842E.37275%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243368
On 5/13/14, 7:14 AM, in article lkt9d3$cvp$3@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
<ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote:

> On 14-05-13 05:57 AM, William Poaster wrote:
>> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>> 
>>> Silver Slimer wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I can already imagine some of the chapter titles; Chapter 5: GNU/Linux
>>>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 11: GNU/Linux STILL
>>>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 17: It's silly that
>>>> GNU/Linux doesn't have screencasting applications.
>>> 
>>> Chapter 3,649: I, I, I, Me, Me, Me
>> 
>> RecordMyDesktop, Istanbul, xvidcap.
> 
> Of those, RecordMyDesktop seems to be the only one with good reviews.
> However, it indeed seems that there are tools for the job.

Has anyone denied their are screen recorders for Linux?

-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243401

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2014-05-13 08:42 -0700
Message-ID<f0e7f57b-eb56-4464-9a3e-494a36a4980b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#243387
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 3:11:26 PM UTC, Snit wrote:
> On 5/13/14, 7:14 AM, in article lkt9d3$cvp$3@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
> 
> <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > On 14-05-13 05:57 AM, William Poaster wrote:
> 
> >> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> 
> >> 
> 
> >>> Silver Slimer wrote:
> 
> >>> 
> 
> >>>> I can already imagine some of the chapter titles; Chapter 5: GNU/Linux
> 
> >>>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 11: GNU/Linux STILL
> 
> >>>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 17: It's silly that
> 
> >>>> GNU/Linux doesn't have screencasting applications.
> 
> >>> 
> 
> >>> Chapter 3,649: I, I, I, Me, Me, Me
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> RecordMyDesktop, Istanbul, xvidcap.
> 
> > 
> 
> > Of those, RecordMyDesktop seems to be the only one with good reviews.
> 
> > However, it indeed seems that there are tools for the job.
> 
> 
> 
> Has anyone denied their are screen recorders for Linux?
> 
You have repeatedly you sniveling clit.
> 
> -- 
> 
> * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
> 
> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
> 
> * Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
> 
> * Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
> 
> * Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
> 
> * Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
> 
> * Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
> 
> * Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
> 
> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

Another forum ruined by 
Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy of Prescott, Arizona 86301 
http://prescottcomputerguy.com 
The best website design in Prescott, AZ is shown at his own site 
http://prescottcomputerguy.com/web-design.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243382

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Message-ID<CF97841C.37275%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243344
On 5/13/14, 2:57 AM, in article 8t694b-mo4.ln1@myhost.linuxnetworkbeta.net,
"William Poaster" <wp@induh-vidual.net> wrote:

> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> 
>> Silver Slimer wrote:
>> 
>>> I can already imagine some of the chapter titles; Chapter 5: GNU/Linux
>>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 11: GNU/Linux STILL
>>> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 17: It's silly that
>>> GNU/Linux doesn't have screencasting applications.
>> 
>> Chapter 3,649: I, I, I, Me, Me, Me
> 
> RecordMyDesktop, Istanbul, xvidcap.

Those are screen recorders. Sure. Nobody has suggested otherwise or that
Linux does not offer a fair number of such programs.


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243123

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
Message-ID<CF963C1B.370E8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243079
On 5/12/14, 2:35 AM, in article
c32f6dd3-14b7-4583-842a-d9ff8f78dd27@googlegroups.com, "Poisoned by Win 8.1"
<trigonometry1972@gmail.com> wrote:

... 
>> Another forum ruined by
>> 
>> Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy of Prescott, Arizona 86301
>> 
>> http://prescottcomputerguy.com
>> 
>> The best web design in Prescott, AZ is shown at his website
>> 
>> http://prescottcomputerguy.com/web-design.html
> 
> Steve, Are you missing your blowup doll? And you suspect "Snit" of
> taking it? 

LOL!


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243125

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-12 08:52 -0700
Message-ID<CF963C35.370E8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243074
On 5/11/14, 6:54 PM, in article 87zjin4v87.fsf@gmail.com, "Hadron"
<hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:

> Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> http://www.tylervigen.com/correlation_project/correlation_images/us-spending-
>> on-science-space-and-technology_suicides-by-hanging-strangulation-and-suffoca
>> tion.png
>> 
>> When you put funding into science and space you make people feel
>> insignificant. This leads to violence. It is what Snit and other
>> liberals want. Suffocate our souls until we suffocate ourselves.
> 
> You seem confused.

He is getting more and more pathetic.

If you look at the site you will find it is all about "spurious
correlations": <http://www.tylervigen.com>. No claim of causation is implied
by the chart.

>> Another forum ruined by
>> Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy of Prescott, Arizona 86301
>> http://prescottcomputerguy.com
>> The best web design in Prescott, AZ is shown at his website
>> http://prescottcomputerguy.com/web-design.html

This is just sickness... more and more efforts to harm me personally and
professionally. 

-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web