Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #243384
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations |
| Date | 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF978426.37275%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <XnsA32BC20273AE6tattoovampire@178.63.61.145> <8t694b-mo4.ln1@myhost.linuxnetworkbeta.net> <lksvlr$758$1@dont-email.me> <p2e94b-9h7.ln1@myhost.linuxnetworkbeta.net> <lkt6ek$qdl$1@dont-email.me> |
On 5/13/14, 6:24 AM, in article lkt6ek$qdl$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann"
<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>> RecordMyDesktop, Istanbul, xvidcap.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There are more. Also more capable ones.
>>
>> No doubt, Peter, they are just the ones I thought of "off the top of my
>> head".
>>
>
> They are fine enough for at least 90% of the tasks where you would need
> screencasting software.
Maybe the tasks you need - but not me! But even if they were, that does not
change the fact that your past claims on the topic have been flat out wrong:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Snit:
-----
Excellent screencasting software, similar to ScreenFlow. And
example of something I find key to its use:
<http://youtu.be/To4v70huwAU>. What OSS tool on desktop Linux
has anything even close?
-----
Peter Köhlmann:
-----
There are several more. Look up "Istanbul" for example or
"Byzanz", or "Cankiri" The list can grow quite a bit, but
these are the most used ones
-----
No program Peter pointed to does the task shown in the video. Peter
never found *any* way on desktop Linux.
Message-ID: <jkpf9p$545$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/cLC0Mo>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Köhlmann:
-----
In fact, there are at least 3 programs for screencasting which do
either without exception *all* he "needs" or can do it combined
with others
-----
| You have spoken of three programs.
No, I have not. Your incredibly bad reading comprehension is
rearing its ugly head again,
-----
Both of those quotes come from the same day and the same thread and were
stated in that order. In another thread on a previous day Peter gave the
names of three screen recording programs: Istanbul, Byzanz, and Cankiri
Message ID: <l9scpl$fig$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/Q85TGT>
Message ID: <l9spoa$5qn$2@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/o6vJcb>
Message-ID: <jkpf9p$545$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/cLC0Mo>
---------------------------------------------------------------
> In the past I have used both RecordMyDesktop and Istanbul. Since some years I
> mostly run "RecordItNow" for the occasional need to do screencasting. I prefer
> its simplicity while at the same time it provides nearly everything I would
> need. I actually don't like software which tries to be everything when you can
> get the same result with the combination of simple tools.
As you have been told, though, there is no combination of tools you can use
where you record with one tool and it passes on information about window
placement, keystrokes, mouse clicks, mouse movement, etc. so you can show or
hide these things as you wish in your video editor.
You, of course, claim to have secret Voldermort software that does just
this! The problem, however, is none of the screen recorders for Linux export
with any format that has these features. None I can find nor none you can
name.
And then there is the problem that done of the video editors have tools to
work with this information even it was exported.
Meaning you are simply wrong. Again.
> There is screencasting software which can do more then "RecordItNow" but for
> that one case in hundreds of years where it would not be "good enough" they
> can make that software better, until I think that its advantages outweight the
> disadvantages
You know nothing of screencasting. Fine. I am not going to claim you do.
--
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-11 18:49 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 03:54 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-11 19:29 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 02:35 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-12 11:47 +0000
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:02 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 09:29 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 12:48 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:27 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:50 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 11:05 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 16:26 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 13:31 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:01 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:56 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:21 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 17:11 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:19 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:52 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2014-05-12 20:54 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 20:05 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 18:58 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:22 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:14 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:12 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:18 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:50 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 14:45 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:26 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 10:21 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 12:45 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:02 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:57 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:09 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:57 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:06 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 19:00 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 17:13 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:19 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 20:50 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 20:52 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:57 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 18:08 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2014-05-12 20:57 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 20:32 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 20:00 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 07:57 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:22 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:36 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:48 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:16 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 18:08 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 10:22 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 11:29 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 11:34 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-12 23:04 +0000
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:23 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-13 10:57 +0100
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-13 13:28 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-13 12:59 +0100
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-13 15:24 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:43 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 15:39 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 15:42 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:14 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:42 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:52 -0700
csiph-web