Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #473101 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-10-22 22:44 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-10-24 21:25 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 201 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-10-22 22:44 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-23 09:06 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 06:17 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-23 09:20 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 06:47 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-23 06:54 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 07:34 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-23 08:23 -0500
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-23 10:07 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-23 10:57 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-23 11:13 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-23 17:11 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-23 13:28 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-23 19:13 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-23 12:37 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-23 18:43 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 23:21 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 10:13 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 07:16 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-23 20:02 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-23 17:53 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-23 18:18 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 10:15 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-24 08:37 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-23 18:41 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 23:20 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-23 20:03 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-23 18:12 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 10:39 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 19:54 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 17:34 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 22:23 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 18:36 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-24 16:56 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-24 21:19 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 18:27 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-24 18:37 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-24 16:32 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-24 02:05 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 19:17 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 19:32 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 02:37 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-24 08:39 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 06:14 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 10:45 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-24 15:26 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-24 08:49 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 13:03 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-24 18:45 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 19:30 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 10:53 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 13:02 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-24 18:08 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 14:15 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-24 18:19 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 14:23 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-24 18:50 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-24 16:41 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 14:00 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-24 21:01 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 14:31 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-24 06:58 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 10:49 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 08:34 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-24 08:48 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 09:05 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-23 20:00 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 17:29 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-23 17:59 -0700
What is your profession, Owl ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-23 17:07 -0700
Re: What is your profession, Owl ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-24 02:06 +0000
Are you Chris Caputo ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-23 22:53 -0700
Re: Are you Chris Caputo ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 23:13 -0700
Re: Are you Chris Caputo ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 03:09 -0700
Re: What is your profession, Owl ? DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-24 10:28 -0400
Re: What is your profession, Owl ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 07:47 -0700
What is your profession, Owl ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-24 07:53 -0700
Re: What is your profession, Owl ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-24 15:06 +0000
Re: What is your profession, Owl ? Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 20:10 +0200
Re: What is your profession, Owl ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 11:40 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-23 19:44 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-23 18:03 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 10:28 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-24 08:39 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 08:49 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 20:07 +0200
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-24 18:11 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 20:17 +0200
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-24 18:37 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-25 00:37 +0200
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 16:22 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-25 12:20 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 14:18 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-24 16:41 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-24 16:58 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-25 07:13 -0500
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-24 18:38 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-25 03:43 +0200
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-24 18:58 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 18:58 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-24 18:39 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-25 03:48 +0200
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-24 18:56 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-25 04:14 +0200
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-24 19:29 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 19:46 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-24 12:25 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-24 09:38 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 10:07 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 13:12 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-24 15:38 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 12:58 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 17:30 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 15:19 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-24 21:56 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-25 09:48 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-25 07:04 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-25 08:31 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-24 16:39 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-24 21:10 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-24 18:50 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-25 12:39 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-25 08:53 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-25 13:09 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-25 10:56 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-25 17:11 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-25 10:22 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-25 11:08 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-25 14:32 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-26 08:07 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-26 14:44 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-26 12:10 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-26 16:46 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-26 10:04 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-26 13:48 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-10-26 17:55 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-27 11:41 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-27 08:56 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-10-27 17:08 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-27 11:17 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-27 16:12 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-10-27 21:01 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-27 14:10 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-27 18:03 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-27 14:41 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-27 20:26 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-25 06:57 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-25 16:44 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-25 10:06 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-25 16:02 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-26 08:05 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-25 06:26 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-24 12:47 -0500
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 11:09 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-24 18:43 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-25 07:06 -0500
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-25 05:07 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 10:25 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 07:32 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-24 12:22 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 13:07 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 10:22 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-23 12:00 -0500
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-23 17:24 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-23 12:30 -0500
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-10-23 18:48 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-23 12:38 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-23 12:45 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 11:12 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 18:28 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-23 12:43 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 13:01 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-23 14:30 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-23 14:40 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 15:07 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 14:51 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-23 19:57 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-23 18:01 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-23 16:32 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 18:20 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 11:43 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-23 18:44 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 23:23 +0000
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 16:57 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-23 18:03 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 10:30 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-24 10:30 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-23 12:19 -0500
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 10:26 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-25 11:02 -0400
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-28 03:37 +0100
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-27 20:41 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-29 07:50 -0500
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 23:43 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-28 03:34 +0100
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-27 19:38 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-28 04:00 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-29 07:49 -0500
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-29 07:22 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 22:56 -0700
Re: Attention "Hobbyware" Accusers DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-24 21:25 -0400
Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-24 14:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e901547d-0b09-4591-b7ac-732d8502c8af@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473409 |
On Wednesday, October 24, 2018 at 2:01:38 PM UTC-7, owl wrote: > SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > > On 2018-10-24 2:15 p.m., proletariat wrote: > >> On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:08:07 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >> > >>> proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:26:43 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> wrote: > >>>>>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:39:59 -0400, SilverSlimer wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 2018-10-23 10:05 p.m., owl wrote: > >>>>>>>> proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 19:13:10 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:11:50 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 10:57:17 -0400, SilverSlimer wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-10-23 10:07 a.m., proletariat wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 08:23:18 -0500, chrisv wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proletariat wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's a rather fitting > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *plonk* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And another Stallman worshiper surfaces like a pile of shit in a toilet > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bowl floating to the surface. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To be fair to chrisv, you're clearly a troll and he has no patient for > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that. On the other hand, we can't expect any kind of objectivity from > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the guy. His behaviour on the newsgroup, over the years, has made it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear that he's an unapologetic leftist who intentionally closes his > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> eyes and ears to reality. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Just about everyone in this group is a troll, including the OP for this > >>>>>>>>>>>>> thread. However, based upon my own experiences I truly believe Linux is > >>>>>>>>>>>>> crap. At least for the tasks I need to perform. Linux should give up trying > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to be Windows and concentrate on what it does best, supercomputers, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded operating system for TV's, microwaves and such, Android and > >>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly servers. Windows and OSX run circles around Linux and no matter > >>>>>>>>>>>>> how much the bearded masses will claim Linux's superiority, the vast > >>>>>>>>>>>>> majority of people do not see it that way. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The typical Linux experience goes something like this: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. The break up with your current girlfriend. Her name is Windows. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. The discovery of a new girlfriend who does everything you deamand of her > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and doesn't cost anything or spy on you. Her name is Linux. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. The courtship and honeymoon phase with Linux. This is where Linux can do > >>>>>>>>>>>>> no wrong and you tell all your friends about how great Linux is compared to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> your old girlfriend Windows. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. The 7 month itch. This is where you start to realize all the extra hoops > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and rings you need to jump through in order to date Linux. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. The break up with Linux. You ultimately realize you have been fooling > >>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself into believing Linux is better than your last girlfriend Windows. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 6. The return to Windows. This is where you return to your previous > >>>>>>>>>>>>> girlfriend Windows because you now realize how great she is and how you > >>>>>>>>>>>>> will never leave her again. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> It happens all the time when people give Linux a try. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Back to a life of "Yes, Dear." That sounds great! Not. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Beats a life of "fix this, fix that". That's life being married to Linux. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Nope. That's Windows, which is always in need of a "fix" of some sort. > >>>>>>>>>> I never have to do the kind of annoying system maintenance with Linux > >>>>>>>>>> that the typical Windows user has to put up with on almost a daily basis. > >>>>>>>>>> Linux just runs and runs without hiccup and lets me do whatever the hell > >>>>>>>>>> I want with the system. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I rarely have problems with Windows but I build my own systems and only use > >>>>>>>>> Windows Professional so I can utilize Group Policies if I wish. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Group Policy == boring, irrelevant MS SysAdmin crap that nobody but an > >>>>>>>> IT drone in a Windows-only shop even cares about. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Judging from your posting history, you are a programmer who enjoys > >>>>>>>>> tinkering with the operating system so problems with Linux are viewed as > >>>>>>>>> challenges. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> What are these "problems with Linux"? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> You probably use vi or emacs to write emails to grandma so your opinion is > >>>>>>>>> one of an outlier. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You and grandma chit-chat about Group Policy? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Try showing your command line wizardry, a spreadsheet using sc and so forth > >>>>>>>>> to the population at large and they will probably consider you a relic from > >>>>>>>>> the stone age. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> They will laugh until I show it pwning Excel. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Much like the newspaper reporter who still writes his articles on a Royal > >>>>>>>>> typewriter. I'm sure they can be found as well but it's not mainstream. > >>>>>>>>> So basically, you like Linux for the very reason most people dislike Linux. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> What's a "newspaper reporter," Gramps? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I can imagine what his answer would be, but the problems I can cite with > >>>>>>> Linux are those related to ACPI (which developers will admit to and > >>>>>>> which were issues with Windows as well in the early 2000s) and > >>>>>>> third-party software. Only the former is actually a problem with Linux > >>>>>>> itself though. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I missed the original reply but, Group Policy Editor is a great tool. Linux > >>>>>> has nothing like it. Oh, and I can use the CLI to perform most if not all > >>>>>> of the same tasks, I choose not to because the chances of typing cryptic 40 > >>>>>> character line and getting it correct with no errors is low. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> SC is a joke. > >>>>>> I'm sure you can craft a scenario where it performs better than Excel just > >>>>>> like cli vs gui proponents can do the same. > >>>>> > >>>>> It's not a matter of performance. It's a matter of capability. SC is > >>>>> open source, which means that it can be easily modified to do far more > >>>>> than it's original intentions: > >>>>> > >>>>> https://imgur.com/a/teQndDO > >>>>> > >>>>> It is also public domain, which means a company deciding to do so is > >>>>> not restricted by any licensing at all. Hmm... maybe I'll keep my version > >>>>> closed-source and sell it to companies needing something more powerful > >>>>> than Excel. > >>>> > >>>> That and $10.00 will get you a one day CTA (Chicago Transit Authority). > >>>> Virtually nobody really cares about source code and open source for > >>>> spreadsheet programs. They care about manipulating and presenting data and > >>>> Excel is king. > >>> > >>> Excel == pwned. > >>> https://imgur.com/a/teQndDO > >> > >> Not even close. > >> You'll have a tough sell on that one. > >> > >>>> Go ask a finance student. > >>> > >>> Ask a Harvard senior when the Revolutionary War took place. > >>> Students are morons. > >> > >> Touche' > >> I can't argue with that. > > > > Off-topic but I have to ask you this: > > > > A lot of people come and go here but your posts, so far, as pretty > > reasonable. Are you planning on sticking around? > > > > Why would he leave now after all these years? Just hogwash from him. But Prescott Computer Guy has thoroughly left tech behind and is simply holding me guilty for the exploits of himself. It was Prescott Computer Guy who flooded Sandman's site dozens of times and pretended he did not do it. Despite Prescott Computer Guy's claim that he has "no skill in making enemies" (a lie as confirmed by the fact that he posts over 1000 times a month) he was quoted asking people how they would do a DDOS attack. How is Blender on Linux doing anything above the lowest common denominator? My view is beyond your understanding. Who _ doesn't_ know that this kind of phooey is Prescott Computer Guy's modus operandi, not the modus operandi of Sandman? It is all just projection... the trolling, the forging, the writing of incomprehensible idiocy, the tantrums... the false bravado and eagerness to show how butthurt he is over being kicked from the schoolyard for shitting in it again... Prescott Computer Guy can not help himself ;) Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! -- "You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention" Steve Carroll, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-24 06:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g3bc3oF358tU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #473253 |
On 10/23/18 7:05 PM, owl wrote: ... >>> Nope. That's Windows, which is always in need of a "fix" of some sort. >>> I never have to do the kind of annoying system maintenance with Linux >>> that the typical Windows user has to put up with on almost a daily basis. >>> Linux just runs and runs without hiccup and lets me do whatever the hell >>> I want with the system. >> >> I rarely have problems with Windows but I build my own systems and only use >> Windows Professional so I can utilize Group Policies if I wish. >> > > > Group Policy == boring, irrelevant MS SysAdmin crap that nobody but an > IT drone in a Windows-only shop even cares about. So something you cannot do with Linux. OK. >> Judging from your posting history, you are a programmer who enjoys >> tinkering with the operating system so problems with Linux are viewed as >> challenges. > > > What are these "problems with Linux"? My issue is the lack of choice and the issues with getting tasks done. I can go into details... but we have covered this before. And, of course, I do not mean all tasks -- there are many it is second to none with (many tasks best handled in the CLI, for example). >> You probably use vi or emacs to write emails to grandma so your opinion is >> one of an outlier. > > > You and grandma chit-chat about Group Policy? It was during the discussion about the CLI. >> Try showing your command line wizardry, a spreadsheet using sc and so forth >> to the population at large and they will probably consider you a relic from >> the stone age. > > They will laugh until I show it pwning Excel. Accept you have not. You set ABSURD "standards" based on making the worksheet (singular!) as large (and untested) as you can and then claim this as a "win". >> Much like the newspaper reporter who still writes his articles on a Royal >> typewriter. I'm sure they can be found as well but it's not mainstream. >> So basically, you like Linux for the very reason most people dislike Linux. > > What's a "newspaper reporter," Gramps? Linux is a great choice for some things... but so are other choices. Choice is good. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-24 10:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1ctavspsmeaxq.f3o4ahwtvd7t.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #473306 |
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:58:16 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 10/23/18 7:05 PM, owl wrote: > ... >>>> Nope. That's Windows, which is always in need of a "fix" of some sort. >>>> I never have to do the kind of annoying system maintenance with Linux >>>> that the typical Windows user has to put up with on almost a daily basis. >>>> Linux just runs and runs without hiccup and lets me do whatever the hell >>>> I want with the system. >>> >>> I rarely have problems with Windows but I build my own systems and only use >>> Windows Professional so I can utilize Group Policies if I wish. >>> >> >> >> Group Policy == boring, irrelevant MS SysAdmin crap that nobody but an >> IT drone in a Windows-only shop even cares about. > > So something you cannot do with Linux. OK. Yes. And with Windows I can use the cli or the group policy editor so in effect I have more choice than with Linux. >>> Judging from your posting history, you are a programmer who enjoys >>> tinkering with the operating system so problems with Linux are viewed as >>> challenges. >> >> >> What are these "problems with Linux"? > > My issue is the lack of choice and the issues with getting tasks done. I > can go into details... but we have covered this before. And, of course, > I do not mean all tasks -- there are many it is second to none with > (many tasks best handled in the CLI, for example). Same here. >>> You probably use vi or emacs to write emails to grandma so your opinion is >>> one of an outlier. >> >> >> You and grandma chit-chat about Group Policy? > > It was during the discussion about the CLI. Owl is now doing the Linux two-step. >>> Try showing your command line wizardry, a spreadsheet using sc and so forth >>> to the population at large and they will probably consider you a relic from >>> the stone age. >> >> They will laugh until I show it pwning Excel. > > Accept you have not. You set ABSURD "standards" based on making the > worksheet (singular!) as large (and untested) as you can and then claim > this as a "win". Like I said, anyone can cherry pick examples to make their choice look good. However when it comes down to using sc vs Excel for day to day spreadsheet tasks, it's ludicrous to believe people would choose SC over Excel. >>> Much like the newspaper reporter who still writes his articles on a Royal >>> typewriter. I'm sure they can be found as well but it's not mainstream. >>> So basically, you like Linux for the very reason most people dislike Linux. >> >> What's a "newspaper reporter," Gramps? > > Linux is a great choice for some things... but so are other choices. > Choice is good. Yes. Mainstream desktop computing is not one of the things Linux does well. Supercomputer operating systems is one thing Linux does well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-24 08:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bb811664-3e63-41c8-9e9f-5f73f3d61c6d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473327 |
On Wednesday, October 24, 2018 at 7:49:24 AM UTC-7, proletariat wrote: > On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:58:16 -0700, Snit wrote: > > > On 10/23/18 7:05 PM, owl wrote: > > ... > >>>> Nope. That's Windows, which is always in need of a "fix" of some sort. > >>>> I never have to do the kind of annoying system maintenance with Linux > >>>> that the typical Windows user has to put up with on almost a daily basis. > >>>> Linux just runs and runs without hiccup and lets me do whatever the hell > >>>> I want with the system. > >>> > >>> I rarely have problems with Windows but I build my own systems and only use > >>> Windows Professional so I can utilize Group Policies if I wish. > >>> > >> > >> > >> Group Policy == boring, irrelevant MS SysAdmin crap that nobody but an > >> IT drone in a Windows-only shop even cares about. > > > > So something you cannot do with Linux. OK. > > Yes. > And with Windows I can use the cli or the group policy editor so in effect > I have more choice than with Linux. > > >>> Judging from your posting history, you are a programmer who enjoys > >>> tinkering with the operating system so problems with Linux are viewed as > >>> challenges. > >> > >> > >> What are these "problems with Linux"? > > > > My issue is the lack of choice and the issues with getting tasks done. I > > can go into details... but we have covered this before. And, of course, > > I do not mean all tasks -- there are many it is second to none with > > (many tasks best handled in the CLI, for example). > > Same here. > > >>> You probably use vi or emacs to write emails to grandma so your opinion is > >>> one of an outlier. > >> > >> > >> You and grandma chit-chat about Group Policy? > > > > It was during the discussion about the CLI. > > Owl is now doing the Linux two-step. > > > >>> Try showing your command line wizardry, a spreadsheet using sc and so forth > >>> to the population at large and they will probably consider you a relic from > >>> the stone age. > >> > >> They will laugh until I show it pwning Excel. > > > > Accept you have not. You set ABSURD "standards" based on making the > > worksheet (singular!) as large (and untested) as you can and then claim > > this as a "win". > > Like I said, anyone can cherry pick examples to make their choice look > good. However when it comes down to using sc vs Excel for day to day > spreadsheet tasks, it's ludicrous to believe people would choose SC over > Excel. > > > >>> Much like the newspaper reporter who still writes his articles on a Royal > >>> typewriter. I'm sure they can be found as well but it's not mainstream. > >>> So basically, you like Linux for the very reason most people dislike Linux. > >> > >> What's a "newspaper reporter," Gramps? > > > > Linux is a great choice for some things... but so are other choices. > > Choice is good. > > Yes. > Mainstream desktop computing is not one of the things Linux does well. > Supercomputer operating systems is one thing Linux does well. See: I quoted specific examples of Larry Washington holding me accountable for the actions of others -- lying, etc. His response: to double down on your lies. It is clear from the way Larry Washington complained - by demanding fundamentals of the operating system and so on - he has never understood a graphically complex challenge before. If he had he'd have understood the requirements of learning to use the && and || operators! Larry Washington claims to be the Linux-expert, let's see him put up an example but lacking the shipping/handling procedures.How Larry Washington determines when to use his annoying flood script: http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snit_flood. -- What Every Entrepreneur Must Know https://youtu.be/iztSc_msHuo http://www.5z8.info/mydick_x6g9hr_nakedgrandmas.jpg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhOfBmWwCVY Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-24 08:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g3bihvF4h7nU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #473327 |
On 10/24/18 7:49 AM, proletariat wrote: > On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:58:16 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 10/23/18 7:05 PM, owl wrote: >> ... >>>>> Nope. That's Windows, which is always in need of a "fix" of some sort. >>>>> I never have to do the kind of annoying system maintenance with Linux >>>>> that the typical Windows user has to put up with on almost a daily basis. >>>>> Linux just runs and runs without hiccup and lets me do whatever the hell >>>>> I want with the system. >>>> >>>> I rarely have problems with Windows but I build my own systems and only use >>>> Windows Professional so I can utilize Group Policies if I wish. >>>> >>> >>> >>> Group Policy == boring, irrelevant MS SysAdmin crap that nobody but an >>> IT drone in a Windows-only shop even cares about. >> >> So something you cannot do with Linux. OK. > > Yes. > And with Windows I can use the cli or the group policy editor so in effect > I have more choice than with Linux. I do not do much with Group Policy but I recognize it as a good tool... even for small networks (or, really, on a single computer with "Local Group Policy"). >>>> Judging from your posting history, you are a programmer who enjoys >>>> tinkering with the operating system so problems with Linux are viewed as >>>> challenges. >>> >>> >>> What are these "problems with Linux"? >> >> My issue is the lack of choice and the issues with getting tasks done. I >> can go into details... but we have covered this before. And, of course, >> I do not mean all tasks -- there are many it is second to none with >> (many tasks best handled in the CLI, for example). > > Same here. My challenge to people who like ANY tool is to show what they can do with it and HOW. >>>> You probably use vi or emacs to write emails to grandma so your opinion is >>>> one of an outlier. >>> >>> >>> You and grandma chit-chat about Group Policy? >> >> It was during the discussion about the CLI. > > Owl is now doing the Linux two-step. Right... things he does not like cannot be done by "Grandma", a stand-in for the general user, but almost NOTHING he shows can be done by that general user. Does not mean he is wrong to do things in ways different than the norm, but he sometimes goes FAR out of his way to make convoluted methods to do simple things. My favorite example is when he made thousands of premade files which were largely the same except for color settings so he could pick those "instead" of directly picking colors. It would be like making a second drive have soft links / shortcuts / aliases to files on a first drive so you can pick those pointer files and claim you did not pick the files themselves. He challenged me to do something similar... so I made a script that looked at the current desktop image and selected colors to match that. Unlike his solution I could use ANY desktop image I wanted on the fly... no pre-setting what ones to use. And I am NOT a programmer. Not even a good scripter. >>>> Try showing your command line wizardry, a spreadsheet using sc and so forth >>>> to the population at large and they will probably consider you a relic from >>>> the stone age. >>> >>> They will laugh until I show it pwning Excel. >> >> Accept you have not. You set ABSURD "standards" based on making the >> worksheet (singular!) as large (and untested) as you can and then claim >> this as a "win". > > Like I said, anyone can cherry pick examples to make their choice look > good. However when it comes down to using sc vs Excel for day to day > spreadsheet tasks, it's ludicrous to believe people would choose SC over > Excel. Exactly right. It would be like me picking Numbers and claiming it is better than Excel because it does some things better. For many home users Numbers is better, esp. those with low needs in a spreadsheet, but for any even moderately serious number crunching Excel blows Numbers away. >>>> Much like the newspaper reporter who still writes his articles on a Royal >>>> typewriter. I'm sure they can be found as well but it's not mainstream. >>>> So basically, you like Linux for the very reason most people dislike Linux. >>> >>> What's a "newspaper reporter," Gramps? >> >> Linux is a great choice for some things... but so are other choices. >> Choice is good. > > Yes. > Mainstream desktop computing is not one of the things Linux does well. > Supercomputer operating systems is one thing Linux does well. Largely agreed (though if someone wants to use Linux as their desktop computer and they say it serves them well I have no issue with that). -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-24 09:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <acfba3b3-1c68-44a2-92f2-e6d6068f20db@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473341 |
On Wednesday, October 24, 2018 at 8:48:19 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 10/24/18 7:49 AM, proletariat wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:58:16 -0700, Snit wrote: > > > >> On 10/23/18 7:05 PM, owl wrote: > >> ... > >>>>> Nope. That's Windows, which is always in need of a "fix" of some sort. > >>>>> I never have to do the kind of annoying system maintenance with Linux > >>>>> that the typical Windows user has to put up with on almost a daily basis. > >>>>> Linux just runs and runs without hiccup and lets me do whatever the hell > >>>>> I want with the system. > >>>> > >>>> I rarely have problems with Windows but I build my own systems and only use > >>>> Windows Professional so I can utilize Group Policies if I wish. > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Group Policy == boring, irrelevant MS SysAdmin crap that nobody but an > >>> IT drone in a Windows-only shop even cares about. > >> > >> So something you cannot do with Linux. OK. > > > > Yes. > > And with Windows I can use the cli or the group policy editor so in effect > > I have more choice than with Linux. > > I do not do much with Group Policy but I recognize it as a good tool... > even for small networks (or, really, on a single computer with "Local > Group Policy"). > > >>>> Judging from your posting history, you are a programmer who enjoys > >>>> tinkering with the operating system so problems with Linux are viewed as > >>>> challenges. > >>> > >>> > >>> What are these "problems with Linux"? > >> > >> My issue is the lack of choice and the issues with getting tasks done. I > >> can go into details... but we have covered this before. And, of course, > >> I do not mean all tasks -- there are many it is second to none with > >> (many tasks best handled in the CLI, for example). > > > > Same here. > > My challenge to people who like ANY tool is to show what they can do > with it and HOW. > > >>>> You probably use vi or emacs to write emails to grandma so your opinion is > >>>> one of an outlier. > >>> > >>> > >>> You and grandma chit-chat about Group Policy? > >> > >> It was during the discussion about the CLI. > > > > Owl is now doing the Linux two-step. > > Right... things he does not like cannot be done by "Grandma", a stand-in > for the general user, but almost NOTHING he shows can be done by that > general user. Does not mean he is wrong to do things in ways different > than the norm, but he sometimes goes FAR out of his way to make > convoluted methods to do simple things. My favorite example is when he > made thousands of premade files which were largely the same except for > color settings so he could pick those "instead" of directly picking > colors. It would be like making a second drive have soft links / > shortcuts / aliases to files on a first drive so you can pick those > pointer files and claim you did not pick the files themselves. > > He challenged me to do something similar... so I made a script that > looked at the current desktop image and selected colors to match that. > Unlike his solution I could use ANY desktop image I wanted on the fly... > no pre-setting what ones to use. > > And I am NOT a programmer. Not even a good scripter. > > >>>> Try showing your command line wizardry, a spreadsheet using sc and so forth > >>>> to the population at large and they will probably consider you a relic from > >>>> the stone age. > >>> > >>> They will laugh until I show it pwning Excel. > >> > >> Accept you have not. You set ABSURD "standards" based on making the > >> worksheet (singular!) as large (and untested) as you can and then claim > >> this as a "win". > > > > Like I said, anyone can cherry pick examples to make their choice look > > good. However when it comes down to using sc vs Excel for day to day > > spreadsheet tasks, it's ludicrous to believe people would choose SC over > > Excel. > > Exactly right. It would be like me picking Numbers and claiming it is > better than Excel because it does some things better. For many home > users Numbers is better, esp. those with low needs in a spreadsheet, but > for any even moderately serious number crunching Excel blows Numbers away. > > >>>> Much like the newspaper reporter who still writes his articles on a Royal > >>>> typewriter. I'm sure they can be found as well but it's not mainstream. > >>>> So basically, you like Linux for the very reason most people dislike Linux. > >>> > >>> What's a "newspaper reporter," Gramps? > >> > >> Linux is a great choice for some things... but so are other choices. > >> Choice is good. > > > > Yes. > > Mainstream desktop computing is not one of the things Linux does well. > > Supercomputer operating systems is one thing Linux does well. > > Largely agreed (though if someone wants to use Linux as their desktop > computer and they say it serves them well I have no issue with that). > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> My view is beyond your understanding. Android, runs on the GnuPG kernel. So yeah, GnuPG is mobile. GnuPG is a super computer. GnuPG is a server. GnuPG is a desktop. GnuPG is growing in market share. Steven Carroll's posts are nothing but an inconsequential word salad. Any inconsolable wounded druggie could easily do the same. This is something beyond you. The whole burlesque is full of goofy gaps and counts heavily on Steven Carroll's 'riding Jeff Relf's ass' claim. Steven Carroll would have to have dementia to be unsure of if he "once had" developed a program. Ring any bells? When someone can't tell the same tale one day and the next and employs false, self-image saving bull later, it's extremely obvious what his tactic is. He lies that he uses GnuPG, while really he never timed it on the fly and faithfully played with it. -- This broke the Internet!! http://bit.ly/2oNYRgv http://www.5z8.info/freeanimalporn.com-start-download_s9j7do_dogporn https://youtu.be/iztSc_msHuo Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-23 20:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <wCOzD.961819$RN2.178457@fx40.iad> |
| In reply to | #473195 |
On 2018-10-23 3:13 p.m., owl wrote: > proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> wrote: >> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:11:50 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >> >>> proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> wrote: >>>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 10:57:17 -0400, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2018-10-23 10:07 a.m., proletariat wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 08:23:18 -0500, chrisv wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> proletariat wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's a rather fitting >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *plonk* >>>>>> >>>>>> And another Stallman worshiper surfaces like a pile of shit in a toilet >>>>>> bowl floating to the surface. >>>>> >>>>> To be fair to chrisv, you're clearly a troll and he has no patient for >>>>> that. On the other hand, we can't expect any kind of objectivity from >>>>> the guy. His behaviour on the newsgroup, over the years, has made it >>>>> clear that he's an unapologetic leftist who intentionally closes his >>>>> eyes and ears to reality. >>>> >>>> Just about everyone in this group is a troll, including the OP for this >>>> thread. However, based upon my own experiences I truly believe Linux is >>>> crap. At least for the tasks I need to perform. Linux should give up trying >>>> to be Windows and concentrate on what it does best, supercomputers, >>>> embedded operating system for TV's, microwaves and such, Android and >>>> possibly servers. Windows and OSX run circles around Linux and no matter >>>> how much the bearded masses will claim Linux's superiority, the vast >>>> majority of people do not see it that way. >>>> >>>> The typical Linux experience goes something like this: >>>> >>>> 1. The break up with your current girlfriend. Her name is Windows. >>>> >>>> 2. The discovery of a new girlfriend who does everything you deamand of her >>>> and doesn't cost anything or spy on you. Her name is Linux. >>>> >>>> 3. The courtship and honeymoon phase with Linux. This is where Linux can do >>>> no wrong and you tell all your friends about how great Linux is compared to >>>> your old girlfriend Windows. >>>> >>>> 4. The 7 month itch. This is where you start to realize all the extra hoops >>>> and rings you need to jump through in order to date Linux. >>>> >>>> 5. The break up with Linux. You ultimately realize you have been fooling >>>> yourself into believing Linux is better than your last girlfriend Windows. >>>> >>>> 6. The return to Windows. This is where you return to your previous >>>> girlfriend Windows because you now realize how great she is and how you >>>> will never leave her again. >>>> >>>> It happens all the time when people give Linux a try. >>> >>> Back to a life of "Yes, Dear." That sounds great! Not. >> >> Beats a life of "fix this, fix that". That's life being married to Linux. > > Nope. That's Windows, which is always in need of a "fix" of some sort. > I never have to do the kind of annoying system maintenance with Linux > that the typical Windows user has to put up with on almost a daily basis. > Linux just runs and runs without hiccup and lets me do whatever the hell > I want with the system. I have to say that Linux indeed will just keep on running once you're done setting it up. The updates don't change the operating system's behaviour all too much the way that they do in Windows and MacOS and whatever performance you had post install is the same you'll have three years down the line. Of course, most people won't care because the software they "need" is only available in Windows. It's a shame because I'm a part of that crowd and need certain programs for work-related tasks. Linux also tends to ignore my RAID set up (2x128GB M.2 in RAID 0 + 2x256GB in RAID 0) for whatever reason forcing me into Windows for proper support. I'm sure that there's some sort of workaround but it's a shame it's not detected from the get-go. -- SilverSlimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-23 17:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d56e53f6-44bd-49a8-a3f4-66449c341741@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473234 |
On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 5:00:30 PM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On 2018-10-23 3:13 p.m., owl wrote:
> > proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:11:50 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote:
> >>
> >>> proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 10:57:17 -0400, SilverSlimer wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 2018-10-23 10:07 a.m., proletariat wrote:
> >>>>>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 08:23:18 -0500, chrisv wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> proletariat wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It's a rather fitting
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> *plonk*
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And another Stallman worshiper surfaces like a pile of shit in a toilet
> >>>>>> bowl floating to the surface.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To be fair to chrisv, you're clearly a troll and he has no patient for
> >>>>> that. On the other hand, we can't expect any kind of objectivity from
> >>>>> the guy. His behaviour on the newsgroup, over the years, has made it
> >>>>> clear that he's an unapologetic leftist who intentionally closes his
> >>>>> eyes and ears to reality.
> >>>>
> >>>> Just about everyone in this group is a troll, including the OP for this
> >>>> thread. However, based upon my own experiences I truly believe Linux is
> >>>> crap. At least for the tasks I need to perform. Linux should give up trying
> >>>> to be Windows and concentrate on what it does best, supercomputers,
> >>>> embedded operating system for TV's, microwaves and such, Android and
> >>>> possibly servers. Windows and OSX run circles around Linux and no matter
> >>>> how much the bearded masses will claim Linux's superiority, the vast
> >>>> majority of people do not see it that way.
> >>>>
> >>>> The typical Linux experience goes something like this:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. The break up with your current girlfriend. Her name is Windows.
> >>>>
> >>>> 2. The discovery of a new girlfriend who does everything you deamand of her
> >>>> and doesn't cost anything or spy on you. Her name is Linux.
> >>>>
> >>>> 3. The courtship and honeymoon phase with Linux. This is where Linux can do
> >>>> no wrong and you tell all your friends about how great Linux is compared to
> >>>> your old girlfriend Windows.
> >>>>
> >>>> 4. The 7 month itch. This is where you start to realize all the extra hoops
> >>>> and rings you need to jump through in order to date Linux.
> >>>>
> >>>> 5. The break up with Linux. You ultimately realize you have been fooling
> >>>> yourself into believing Linux is better than your last girlfriend Windows.
> >>>>
> >>>> 6. The return to Windows. This is where you return to your previous
> >>>> girlfriend Windows because you now realize how great she is and how you
> >>>> will never leave her again.
> >>>>
> >>>> It happens all the time when people give Linux a try.
> >>>
> >>> Back to a life of "Yes, Dear." That sounds great! Not.
> >>
> >> Beats a life of "fix this, fix that". That's life being married to Linux.
> >
> > Nope. That's Windows, which is always in need of a "fix" of some sort.
> > I never have to do the kind of annoying system maintenance with Linux
> > that the typical Windows user has to put up with on almost a daily basis.
> > Linux just runs and runs without hiccup and lets me do whatever the hell
> > I want with the system.
>
> I have to say that Linux indeed will just keep on running once you're
> done setting it up. The updates don't change the operating system's
> behaviour all too much the way that they do in Windows and MacOS and
> whatever performance you had post install is the same you'll have three
> years down the line. Of course, most people won't care because the
> software they "need" is only available in Windows.
>
> It's a shame because I'm a part of that crowd and need certain programs
> for work-related tasks. Linux also tends to ignore my RAID set up
> (2x128GB M.2 in RAID 0 + 2x256GB in RAID 0) for whatever reason forcing
> me into Windows for proper support. I'm sure that there's some sort of
> workaround but it's a shame it's not detected from the get-go.
>
>
> --
> SilverSlimer
Did he think that was clever?
Just some names Carroll has used
"Evil" John *
"Evil" Snit *
Big Crotch on a Small Fish
Cornelius Munshower
CSMA Moderator
Edward Stanfield
Fretwiz *
Hitman Hero
Measles
Petruzzellis Kids
Sigmond
Slaveen
Smit
Steve C *
Steve Camoll *
Steve Carroll <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll <stevecarroll@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll <trollkiller@xxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll's Dog *
Steve Carrolll *
Steve Carrroll *
Yevette Owens
Yobo_Obyo
No no hell no. He never agreed to stop flooding. He lied about his trolling just as you would expect. Fool! If Snit has 'a.doc' open in a program such as Cooledit and Steven 'Super Troll' Petruzzellis wants to change its name to 'mack.doc' via a GUI menu item, Snit's method might be OK.
--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened
http://www.5z8.info/michaelangelo-virus_t6v2vq_molotovcocktail
https://www.facebook.com/jenny.eklund
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-23 17:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g39ufmFoojnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #473234 |
On 10/23/18 5:00 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: ... >>> Beats a life of "fix this, fix that". That's life being married to >>> Linux. >> >> Nope. That's Windows, which is always in need of a "fix" of some sort. >> I never have to do the kind of annoying system maintenance with Linux >> that the typical Windows user has to put up with on almost a daily basis. >> Linux just runs and runs without hiccup and lets me do whatever the hell >> I want with the system. > > I have to say that Linux indeed will just keep on running once you're > done setting it up. The updates don't change the operating system's > behaviour all too much the way that they do in Windows and MacOS and > whatever performance you had post install is the same you'll have three > years down the line. Of course, most people won't care because the > software they "need" is only available in Windows. What changes do you think macOS users have had to "endure" or whatever? I mean the big "change" this update was (gasp!) Dark Mode and different accent colors (lots of places made a big deal of this... I find that odd). There were also updates to some views (which can be helpful but are mostly optional) and(another yawner to me) a "dynamic" desktop that changes based on time of day. And this was a "big visual change" update. It had a lot more than most! > It's a shame because I'm a part of that crowd and need certain programs > for work-related tasks. Linux also tends to ignore my RAID set up > (2x128GB M.2 in RAID 0 + 2x256GB in RAID 0) for whatever reason forcing > me into Windows for proper support. I'm sure that there's some sort of > workaround but it's a shame it's not detected from the get-go. > > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-23 17:07 -0700 |
| Subject | What is your profession, Owl ? |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.23--5.07pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #473195 |
Owl: > Linux just runs and runs without hiccup and lets me do > whatever the hell I want with the system. Same with Windows 10, if you know what you're doing. With Windows 10 you can actually _ buy solutions. I have _ never owned a smart phone or a laptop. My editors: Visual Studio Community 2017 / Microsoft Word. My shell: Jeff-Relf.Me/X.HTM ( Visual C++ ) My mouse: Jeff-Relf.Me/g600.PNG What is your profession, Owl ? What does your mouse look like ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-24 02:06 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What is your profession, Owl ? |
| Message-ID | <kl8a908b9z.ab9oa@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #473237 |
Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Owl: >> Linux just runs and runs without hiccup and lets me do >> whatever the hell I want with the system. > > Same with Windows 10, if you know what you're doing. > With Windows 10 you can actually _ buy solutions. > I have _ never owned a smart phone or a laptop. > > My editors: Visual Studio Community 2017 / Microsoft Word. > > My shell: Jeff-Relf.Me/X.HTM ( Visual C++ ) > > My mouse: Jeff-Relf.Me/g600.PNG > > What is your profession, Owl ? That's classified. > What does your mouse look like ? https://www.3dconnexion.com/products/cadmouse.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-23 22:53 -0700 |
| Subject | Are you Chris Caputo ? |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.23--10.53pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #473254 |
> > What is your profession, Owl ? > > That's classified. Why, are you Chris Caputo ? If so, we should do lunch. I'd love to know your history.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-23 23:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Are you Chris Caputo ? |
| Message-ID | <781d1d30-ab62-490a-bf02-984fffeed7a3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473270 |
On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 10:53:23 PM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > > What is your profession, Owl ? > > > > That's classified. > > Why, are you Chris Caputo ? > > If so, we should do lunch. > I'd love to know your history. Did Flooder Steve Carroll think that was clever? Really, what lie? It was Flooder Steve Carroll who stated that he and his hired winos used to trespass all the time and it was just fun. -- My Snoring Solution http://www.5z8.info/nic_cage_naked_y8b5qk_torrentEverything http://www.5z8.info/gruesome-gunshot-wounds_t5z0au_cockdock.gif http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/BilkHelp.html Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-24 03:09 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Are you Chris Caputo ? |
| Message-ID | <13ff96b9-d9c4-4d9d-b2ab-fd45f42726c2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473270 |
On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 10:53:23 PM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > > What is your profession, Owl ? > > > > That's classified. > > Why, are you Chris Caputo ? > > If so, we should do lunch. > I'd love to know your history. Lines of text containing your own words reflected in a funhouse mirror. Where did you go to school? You are bright as a steamed rutabaga. Frankly I do not really mind. Snit Glasser conned Troll Master Steve Carroll as much as he deserves, big fucking deal. Why be a blubbering ass about it? The cult-like herd of convenient friends value conformity instead of choice. Troll Master Steve Carroll's posts are nothing but an incomprehensible mess. -- Best CMS Solution of 2017 http://www.5z8.info/--INITIATE-CREDIT-CARD-XFER--_k7s1jt_inject_worm https://youtu.be/m37dF5X2S-4 http://www.5z8.info/boobs_j0v3qo_dont-just-drizzle Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-24 10:28 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: What is your profession, Owl ? |
| Message-ID | <ok%zD.392645$UI2.333192@fx18.iad> |
| In reply to | #473254 |
On 10/23/2018 10:06 PM, owl wrote:
> Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>
>> What is your profession, Owl ?
>
> That's classified.
<owl_quotes>
Jun 2015: "I'm sitting on my ass at the moment, but at my last job it
was a combination of debian and centos servers, and debian laptops with
win 7 vms. It was a dev shop, but I was primarily an admin. Occasional
grunt work programming during crunch times. Idiotic boss insisted on
running Sid on our servers and had insane requirements such as matching
uids on all boxes. I had enough after a while."
May 2015: "I worked for the USPS for about 10 years..."
Sep 2015: "I did 30 years in the USMC. Retired as a Lt General."
Nov 2015:
DFS: ps except for owl, who claims he bedded tons of hot babes.
owl: *shrug* What can I say. I love women.
DFS: Well, for one thing, you can say the truth. How many was it?
owl: I have no idea. Fifteen years of bar-hopping practically every
night in my 20s and 30s.
</owl_quotes>
I mention his /astounding/ sexual conquests because we all need heroes...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-24 07:47 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: What is your profession, Owl ? |
| Message-ID | <ed31f099-45cf-445d-95de-b659df037cb3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473314 |
On Wednesday, October 24, 2018 at 7:28:39 AM UTC-7, DFS wrote: > On 10/23/2018 10:06 PM, owl wrote: > > Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >> > >> What is your profession, Owl ? > > > > That's classified. > > > <owl_quotes> > > Jun 2015: "I'm sitting on my ass at the moment, but at my last job it > was a combination of debian and centos servers, and debian laptops with > win 7 vms. It was a dev shop, but I was primarily an admin. Occasional > grunt work programming during crunch times. Idiotic boss insisted on > running Sid on our servers and had insane requirements such as matching > uids on all boxes. I had enough after a while." > > May 2015: "I worked for the USPS for about 10 years..." > > Sep 2015: "I did 30 years in the USMC. Retired as a Lt General." > > Nov 2015: > DFS: ps except for owl, who claims he bedded tons of hot babes. > owl: *shrug* What can I say. I love women. > DFS: Well, for one thing, you can say the truth. How many was it? > owl: I have no idea. Fifteen years of bar-hopping practically every > night in my 20s and 30s. > > </owl_quotes> > > > I mention his /astounding/ sexual conquests because we all need heroes... I have known dogs who argue better than you do. Translation of Jeff Relf speak: Jeff Relf's "debugging expertise" blinded him to an add-on he needs that Steve Carroll found in under a minute for MATE. I am not annoyed, he wants me to be but I'm enjoying watching because Jeff Relf's trolling is so absurd. He actively didn't introduce all the tasks that he would inevitably mock... and we all know why, Jeff Relf made that much clear. At least he has his shills to back him. Steve Carroll created at least twenty virtual machines in the last year or so. Let us all have a moment of silence as we honor his accomplishments! The only way that I could overlook MATE's constant need for maintenance because of UI complications or flaky design flaws is if I enjoyed the unending number of lies its community have been feeding Jeff Relf since 1996.You wanting something false to be true does not make it true. - Eight things to never feed your dog http://www.5z8.info/stalin-will-rise-again_j3h5uj_nakedgrandmas.jpg https://youtu.be/E3m_i-x92D0 Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-24 07:53 -0700 |
| Subject | What is your profession, Owl ? |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.24--7.53am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #473314 |
> > > What is your profession, Owl ? > > May 2015: "I worked for the USPS for about 10 years..." > Sep 2015: "I did 30 years in the USMC. Retired as a Lt General." Thanks Mr. DFS. > "Fifteen years of bar-hopping practically every night in my 20s and 30s." He's not doing that now, I'm sure.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-24 15:06 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What is your profession, Owl ? |
| Message-ID | <88basb.3yp@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #473314 |
DFS <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: > On 10/23/2018 10:06 PM, owl wrote: >> Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>> >>> What is your profession, Owl ? >> >> That's classified. > > > <owl_quotes> > > Jun 2015: "I'm sitting on my ass at the moment, but at my last job it > was a combination of debian and centos servers, and debian laptops with > win 7 vms. It was a dev shop, but I was primarily an admin. Occasional > grunt work programming during crunch times. Idiotic boss insisted on > running Sid on our servers and had insane requirements such as matching > uids on all boxes. I had enough after a while." > > May 2015: "I worked for the USPS for about 10 years..." > > Sep 2015: "I did 30 years in the USMC. Retired as a Lt General." > > Nov 2015: > DFS: ps except for owl, who claims he bedded tons of hot babes. > owl: *shrug* What can I say. I love women. > DFS: Well, for one thing, you can say the truth. How many was it? > owl: I have no idea. Fifteen years of bar-hopping practically every > night in my 20s and 30s. > > </owl_quotes> > > > I mention his /astounding/ sexual conquests because we all need heroes... > Damn, I forgot how awesome I was. Thanks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-24 20:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: What is your profession, Owl ? |
| Message-ID | <87va5r6wsa.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #473314 |
DFS <nospam@nospam.com> writes: > On 10/23/2018 10:06 PM, owl wrote: > DFS: ps except for owl, who claims he bedded tons of hot babes. > owl: *shrug* What can I say. I love women. > DFS: Well, for one thing, you can say the truth. How many was it? > owl: I have no idea. Fifteen years of bar-hopping practically every > night in my 20s and 30s. > > </owl_quotes> > > > I mention his /astounding/ sexual conquests because we all need heroes... > Not all heroes wear capes. Owl is indeed a legend in his own lunchtime. -- chrisv alias turdv is a turd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-24 11:40 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: What is your profession, Owl ? |
| Message-ID | <d31d36f5-6bf0-4f76-b393-7fc1b10e5437@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473369 |
On Wednesday, October 24, 2018 at 11:10:15 AM UTC-7, Hadron Quark wrote: > DFS <nospam@nospam.com> writes: > > > On 10/23/2018 10:06 PM, owl wrote: > > DFS: ps except for owl, who claims he bedded tons of hot babes. > > owl: *shrug* What can I say. I love women. > > DFS: Well, for one thing, you can say the truth. How many was it? > > owl: I have no idea. Fifteen years of bar-hopping practically every > > night in my 20s and 30s. > > > > </owl_quotes> > > > > > > I mention his /astounding/ sexual conquests because we all need heroes... > > > > Not all heroes wear capes. Owl is indeed a legend in his own lunchtime. > > -- > chrisv alias turdv is a turd Nobody is being controlled by Microsoft. Asking Sockboy to stop flooding, a thing I didn't do, is not the same as pointing out his trolling. My meaning was that good people show up here so that they can face bullies. It isn't as if we all do not know what this forum is, Flatfish especially. I am an absolute advocate of Linux, because that's where all the stimulating usability improvements are happening. To my way of thinking, spending effort researching a problem is never wasted time. Insisting you know all and attempting to 'prove' others that it is true? That is a waste. -- This Trick Gets Women Hot For You!! http://www.5z8.info/dont-just-drizzle_y8q4ut_5waystokillwithamelon https://youtu.be/OffkiSAsYo8 Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web