Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #481496 > unrolled thread

Another Junk Javashit Site

Started byfr314159@gmail.com
First post2018-12-17 12:25 -0800
Last post2018-12-18 07:48 -0800
Articles 20 on this page of 83 — 16 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  Another Junk Javashit Site fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-17 12:25 -0800
    Re: Another Junk Javashit Site Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-17 20:45 +0000
      Re: Another Junk Javashit Site fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-17 13:02 -0800
        Re: Another Junk Javashit Site DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-17 17:07 -0500
          Re: Another Junk Javashit Site "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-17 23:55 +0000
            Re: Another Junk Javashit Site DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-17 19:20 -0500
              Re: Another Junk Javashit Site "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-18 00:36 +0000
        Re: Another Junk Javashit Site Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-12-17 22:16 +0000
          Re: Another Junk Javashit Site "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-17 23:52 +0000
            Re: Another Junk Javashit Site Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-17 18:24 -0800
          Re: Another Junk Javashit Site Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-17 15:59 -0800
    Re: Another Junk Javashit Site Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-17 16:01 -0800
      Re: Another Junk Javashit Site "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-18 00:42 +0000
        Re: Another Junk Javashit Site owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-18 01:23 +0000
          Re: Another Junk Javashit Site "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-18 01:52 +0000
            Re: Another Junk Javashit Site owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-18 02:32 +0000
              Re: Another Junk Javashit Site RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 03:30 +0000
            Re: Another Junk Javashit Site RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 03:27 +0000
          Re: Another Junk Javashit Site SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-18 10:17 -0500
            Re: Another Junk Javashit Site chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-18 09:26 -0600
              Re: Another Junk Javashit Site owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-18 16:53 +0000
                Re: Another Junk Javashit Site SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-18 12:07 -0500
                  Re: Another Junk Javashit Site owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-18 17:23 +0000
                    Re: Another Junk Javashit Site SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-18 13:27 -0500
                      Re: Another Junk Javashit Site owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-18 18:41 +0000
                        Re: Another Junk Javashit Site SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-12-18 20:51 -0500
                Re: Another Junk Javashit Site RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 03:34 +0000
              Re: Another Junk Javashit Site RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 03:33 +0000
                Re: Another Junk Javashit Site chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-19 07:02 -0600
                  Re: Another Junk Javashit Site Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 07:10 -0700
            Re: Another Junk Javashit Site RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 03:31 +0000
          Re: Another Junk Javashit Site RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 03:25 +0000
            Re: Another Junk Javashit Site chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-19 07:08 -0600
              Re: Another Junk Javashit Site chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-19 07:27 -0600
              Re: Another Junk Javashit Site fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-19 06:11 -0800
                Re: Another Junk Javashit Site chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-19 08:38 -0600
                  Re: Another Junk Javashit Site fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-19 10:40 -0800
                    Re: Another Junk Javashit Site chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-19 13:43 -0600
                  Re: Another Junk Javashit Site vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-19 21:29 +0000
                    Re: Another Junk Javashit Site % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 14:39 -0700
                      Re: Another Junk Javashit Site vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-19 22:12 +0000
                    Re: Another Junk Javashit Site "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-20 00:02 +0000
                    Re: Another Junk Javashit Site DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-19 19:04 -0500
                      Re: Another Junk Javashit Site vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-20 00:46 +0000
                        Re: Another Junk Javashit Site owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-20 01:42 +0000
                          Re: Another Junk Javashit Site % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 18:59 -0700
                        Re: Another Junk Javashit Site DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-12-20 10:21 -0500
                          Re: Another Junk Javashit Site vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-21 14:04 +0000
                            Re: Another Junk Javashit Site snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-21 14:19 +0000
                      Re: Another Junk Javashit Site Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 09:58 +0100
                        Re: Another Junk Javashit Site vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-20 09:13 +0000
                          Re: Another Junk Javashit Site chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-20 06:52 -0600
                    Re: Another Junk Javashit Site Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-12-26 15:43 -0500
                      Re: Another Junk Javashit Site owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-26 21:44 +0000
                        Re: Another Junk Javashit Site "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-26 23:06 +0000
                          Re: Another Junk Javashit Site owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:56 +0000
                            Re: Another Junk Javashit Site Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-12-27 07:14 -0500
                              Re: Another Junk Javashit Site chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 08:12 -0600
                                Re: Another Junk Javashit Site Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-12-29 10:23 -0500
                                  Re: Another Junk Javashit Site owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-29 23:59 +0000
                                    Re: Another Junk Javashit Site Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-12-30 07:04 -0500
                            Re: Another Junk Javashit Site "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2018-12-27 19:23 +0000
                              Re: Another Junk Javashit Site owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-27 19:50 +0000
                                Re: Another Junk Javashit Site % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 13:03 -0700
                                Re: Another Junk Javashit Site "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2018-12-27 20:24 +0000
                                  Re: Another Junk Javashit Site owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-27 21:03 +0000
                        Re: Another Junk Javashit Site Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-12-27 07:13 -0500
                          Re: Another Junk Javashit Site owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:56 +0000
                            Re: Another Junk Javashit Site Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-12-29 10:21 -0500
                              Re: Another Junk Javashit Site owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-29 23:52 +0000
                                Re: Another Junk Javashit Site Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-12-30 07:00 -0500
                                  Re: Another Junk Javashit Site owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-30 23:59 +0000
                                    Re: Another Junk Javashit Site Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-12-31 12:43 -0500
                Re: Another Junk Javashit Site owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-19 18:07 +0000
                  Re: Another Junk Javashit Site fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-12-19 10:34 -0800
                    Re: Another Junk Javashit Site owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-19 21:58 +0000
                      Re: Another Junk Javashit Site "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-19 23:50 +0000
                        Re: Another Junk Javashit Site owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-12-20 00:59 +0000
                      Re: Another Junk Javashit Site "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-12-20 00:11 +0000
                  Re: Another Junk Javashit Site RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 02:26 +0000
                    Re: Another Junk Javashit Site Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-20 07:16 -0700
        Re: Another Junk Javashit Site Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-17 17:27 -0800
          Re: Another Junk Javashit Site Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 07:48 -0800

Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →


#481544

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2018-12-18 16:53 +0000
Message-ID<z0a08b83ga.aho32h@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#481534
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> SilverSlimer wrote:
> 
>> owl wrote:
>>>
>>> F. Russell wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The fact is that handguns, or firearms in general, have no place
>>>> in an advanced civilized society.
>>> 
>>> Yeah, take away guns from law abiding citizens.  That sounds like
>>> a great plan.
>>
>>Fabian seems unaware of Wounded Knee where the authorities took guns 
>>away from the natives "for their safety and protection" before 
>>slaughtering the lot of them.
> 
> The white man did that?  "Fake news"!
> 

The indians kept weapons concealed and fired the first shot.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481548

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-12-18 12:07 -0500
Message-ID<0P9SD.9456$qN7.73@fx12.iad>
In reply to#481544
On 2018-12-18 11:53 a.m., owl wrote:
> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>
>>> owl wrote:
>>>>
>>>> F. Russell wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The fact is that handguns, or firearms in general, have no place
>>>>> in an advanced civilized society.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, take away guns from law abiding citizens.  That sounds like
>>>> a great plan.
>>>
>>> Fabian seems unaware of Wounded Knee where the authorities took guns
>>> away from the natives "for their safety and protection" before
>>> slaughtering the lot of them.
>>
>> The white man did that?  "Fake news"!
> 
> The indians kept weapons concealed and fired the first shot.
> Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

No matter how you look at the event, it is a lesson in the reasons why 
people insist on holding onto their guns. Even if one Native 
accidentally fired as the most popular tale tells, there is no reason 
for ALL of the Natives to have been slaughtered the way that they were.

-- 
SilverSlimer
Free software advocate
Minds: @silverslimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481551

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2018-12-18 17:23 +0000
Message-ID<9a08z08b3g.ah3@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#481548
SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> On 2018-12-18 11:53 a.m., owl wrote:
>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>
>>>> owl wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> F. Russell wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fact is that handguns, or firearms in general, have no place
>>>>>> in an advanced civilized society.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, take away guns from law abiding citizens.  That sounds like
>>>>> a great plan.
>>>>
>>>> Fabian seems unaware of Wounded Knee where the authorities took guns
>>>> away from the natives "for their safety and protection" before
>>>> slaughtering the lot of them.
>>>
>>> The white man did that?  "Fake news"!
>> 
>> The indians kept weapons concealed and fired the first shot.
>> Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
> 
> No matter how you look at the event, it is a lesson in the reasons why 
> people insist on holding onto their guns.

The stupidity was starting a deadly fight after volutarily disarming.

> Even if one Native 
> accidentally fired as the most popular tale tells, there is no reason 
> for ALL of the Natives to have been slaughtered the way that they were.
> 

Some kept rifles under blankets and started firing on the soldiers.
That sort of deception can lead to an overkill reaction.

The "native americans" were not peace-loving innocents.  They did their
share of massacres for centuries before and after the coming of the
white man.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481556

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-12-18 13:27 -0500
Message-ID<K_aSD.32443$BG6.16202@fx01.iad>
In reply to#481551
On 2018-12-18 12:23 p.m., owl wrote:
> SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
>> On 2018-12-18 11:53 a.m., owl wrote:
>>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> owl wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> F. Russell wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The fact is that handguns, or firearms in general, have no place
>>>>>>> in an advanced civilized society.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, take away guns from law abiding citizens.  That sounds like
>>>>>> a great plan.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fabian seems unaware of Wounded Knee where the authorities took guns
>>>>> away from the natives "for their safety and protection" before
>>>>> slaughtering the lot of them.
>>>>
>>>> The white man did that?  "Fake news"!
>>>
>>> The indians kept weapons concealed and fired the first shot.
>>> Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
>>
>> No matter how you look at the event, it is a lesson in the reasons why
>> people insist on holding onto their guns.
> 
> The stupidity was starting a deadly fight after volutarily disarming.

The fact that the act was so stupid is the reason I don't believe that's 
the way that it happened. I sincerely believe that the Natives disarmed 
voluntarily but that a shot was accidentally fired or simply not fired 
at all. I believe that the event was closer to a genocide than a 
misunderstanding.

>> Even if one Native
>> accidentally fired as the most popular tale tells, there is no reason
>> for ALL of the Natives to have been slaughtered the way that they were.
>>
> 
> Some kept rifles under blankets and started firing on the soldiers.
> That sort of deception can lead to an overkill reaction.
> 
> The "native americans" were not peace-loving innocents.  They did their
> share of massacres for centuries before and after the coming of the
> white man.

Agreed but this event in particular seems out of the ordinary.

-- 
SilverSlimer
Free software advocate
Minds: @silverslimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481557

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2018-12-18 18:41 +0000
Message-ID<sz0b803ga.ghuio3@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#481556
SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> On 2018-12-18 12:23 p.m., owl wrote:
>> SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
>>> On 2018-12-18 11:53 a.m., owl wrote:
>>>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> owl wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> F. Russell wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The fact is that handguns, or firearms in general, have no place
>>>>>>>> in an advanced civilized society.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, take away guns from law abiding citizens.  That sounds like
>>>>>>> a great plan.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fabian seems unaware of Wounded Knee where the authorities took guns
>>>>>> away from the natives "for their safety and protection" before
>>>>>> slaughtering the lot of them.
>>>>>
>>>>> The white man did that?  "Fake news"!
>>>>
>>>> The indians kept weapons concealed and fired the first shot.
>>>> Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
>>>
>>> No matter how you look at the event, it is a lesson in the reasons why
>>> people insist on holding onto their guns.
>> 
>> The stupidity was starting a deadly fight after volutarily disarming.
> 
> The fact that the act was so stupid is the reason I don't believe that's 
> the way that it happened. I sincerely believe that the Natives disarmed 
> voluntarily but that a shot was accidentally fired or simply not fired 
> at all. I believe that the event was closer to a genocide than a 
> misunderstanding.
> 

https://www.pbs.org/weta/thewest/resources/archives/eight/wklakota.htm
<quote>
Lakota Accounts of the Massacre at Wounded Knee
...

TURNING HAWK...
When the guns were thus taken and the men thus separated, there was
a crazy man, a young man of very bad influence and in fact a nobody,
among that bunch of Indians fired his gun, and of course the firing
of a gun must have been the breaking of a military rule of some sort,
because immediately the soldiers returned fire and indiscriminate
killing followed.

...

SPOTTED HORSE. This man shot an officer in the army; the first shot
killed this officer. I was a voluntary scout at that encounter and I saw
exactly what was done, and that was what I noticed; that the first shot
killed an officer.

</quote>


>>> Even if one Native
>>> accidentally fired as the most popular tale tells, there is no reason
>>> for ALL of the Natives to have been slaughtered the way that they were.
>>>
>> 
>> Some kept rifles under blankets and started firing on the soldiers.
>> That sort of deception can lead to an overkill reaction.
>> 
>> The "native americans" were not peace-loving innocents.  They did their
>> share of massacres for centuries before and after the coming of the
>> white man.
> 
> Agreed but this event in particular seems out of the ordinary.
> 

Shit gets out of hand sometimes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481572

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-12-18 20:51 -0500
Message-ID<duhSD.74060$h57.11757@fx38.iad>
In reply to#481557
On 2018-12-18 1:41 p.m., owl wrote:
> SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
>> On 2018-12-18 12:23 p.m., owl wrote:
>>> SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
>>>> On 2018-12-18 11:53 a.m., owl wrote:
>>>>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> owl wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> F. Russell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The fact is that handguns, or firearms in general, have no place
>>>>>>>>> in an advanced civilized society.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, take away guns from law abiding citizens.  That sounds like
>>>>>>>> a great plan.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fabian seems unaware of Wounded Knee where the authorities took guns
>>>>>>> away from the natives "for their safety and protection" before
>>>>>>> slaughtering the lot of them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The white man did that?  "Fake news"!
>>>>>
>>>>> The indians kept weapons concealed and fired the first shot.
>>>>> Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
>>>>
>>>> No matter how you look at the event, it is a lesson in the reasons why
>>>> people insist on holding onto their guns.
>>>
>>> The stupidity was starting a deadly fight after volutarily disarming.
>>
>> The fact that the act was so stupid is the reason I don't believe that's
>> the way that it happened. I sincerely believe that the Natives disarmed
>> voluntarily but that a shot was accidentally fired or simply not fired
>> at all. I believe that the event was closer to a genocide than a
>> misunderstanding.
>>
> 
> https://www.pbs.org/weta/thewest/resources/archives/eight/wklakota.htm
> <quote>
> Lakota Accounts of the Massacre at Wounded Knee
> ...
> 
> TURNING HAWK...
> When the guns were thus taken and the men thus separated, there was
> a crazy man, a young man of very bad influence and in fact a nobody,
> among that bunch of Indians fired his gun, and of course the firing
> of a gun must have been the breaking of a military rule of some sort,
> because immediately the soldiers returned fire and indiscriminate
> killing followed.
> 
> ...
> 
> SPOTTED HORSE. This man shot an officer in the army; the first shot
> killed this officer. I was a voluntary scout at that encounter and I saw
> exactly what was done, and that was what I noticed; that the first shot
> killed an officer.
> 
> </quote>

Well then, I guess there were Snits amongst the Natives as well.

>>>> Even if one Native
>>>> accidentally fired as the most popular tale tells, there is no reason
>>>> for ALL of the Natives to have been slaughtered the way that they were.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Some kept rifles under blankets and started firing on the soldiers.
>>> That sort of deception can lead to an overkill reaction.
>>>
>>> The "native americans" were not peace-loving innocents.  They did their
>>> share of massacres for centuries before and after the coming of the
>>> white man.
>>
>> Agreed but this event in particular seems out of the ordinary.
>>
> 
> Shit gets out of hand sometimes.

Agreed, and the simplest solution is always the firing of bullets.

-- 
SilverSlimer
Free software advocate
Minds: @silverslimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481579

FromRonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-19 03:34 +0000
Message-ID<pvce7d$v0p$6@dont-email.me>
In reply to#481544
On 2018-12-18, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>> 
>>> owl wrote:
>>>>
>>>> F. Russell wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The fact is that handguns, or firearms in general, have no place
>>>>> in an advanced civilized society.
>>>> 
>>>> Yeah, take away guns from law abiding citizens.  That sounds like
>>>> a great plan.
>>>
>>>Fabian seems unaware of Wounded Knee where the authorities took guns 
>>>away from the natives "for their safety and protection" before 
>>>slaughtering the lot of them.
>> 
>> The white man did that?  "Fake news"!
>> 
>
> The indians kept weapons concealed and fired the first shot.
> Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

Indians did get screwed and lied to, but they weren't Pollyanas who never 
hurt anyone either. 

-- 
The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481578

FromRonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-19 03:33 +0000
Message-ID<pvce5c$v0p$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#481534
On 2018-12-18, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> SilverSlimer wrote:
>
>> owl wrote:
>>>
>>> F. Russell wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The fact is that handguns, or firearms in general, have no place
>>>> in an advanced civilized society.
>>> 
>>> Yeah, take away guns from law abiding citizens.  That sounds like
>>> a great plan.
>>
>>Fabian seems unaware of Wounded Knee where the authorities took guns 
>>away from the natives "for their safety and protection" before 
>>slaughtering the lot of them.
>
> The white man did that?  "Fake news"!
>
> Careful, or some right-winger will accuse you of using "racist
> anti-white hate speech".

Why is it that you're so hung on race? Liberals want to play the victim 
24/7, unless the victim is white. Then it's, "he should have listened to the 
cop."

-- 
The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481584

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-12-19 07:02 -0600
Message-ID<h6gk1ehdq3rqtdkgpn8jholos3rcb5gva0@4ax.com>
In reply to#481578
RonB wrote:

>Why is it that you're so hung on race? 

I'm no more "hung on race" than anyone else.

>Liberals want

Nope.  Not true.

-- 
'Down here in the South USA we used to call that "nigger-rigged" or
"Afro-engineered".'  -  DumFSck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481630

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-12-20 07:10 -0700
Message-ID<g81m7hFta1gU4@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#481584
On 12/19/18 6:02 AM, chrisv wrote:
> RonB wrote:
> 
>> Why is it that you're so hung on race?
> 
> I'm no more "hung on race" than anyone else.
> 
>> Liberals want
> 
> Nope.  Not true.
> 

RonB feels the need to speak for others because he cannot refute what 
they actually believe.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481577

FromRonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-19 03:31 +0000
Message-ID<pvce2o$v0p$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#481533
On 2018-12-18, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> On 2018-12-17 8:23 p.m., owl wrote:
>> F. Russell <fr@random.info> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 16:01:30 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The problems on that page have nothing to do with the
>>>> language that was misused.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sure.  The murder rate has also nothing to do with the handguns
>>> that were misused.
>>>
>>> The fact is that handguns, or firearms in general, have no place
>>> in an advanced civilized society.
>>>
>> 
>> Yeah, take away guns from law abiding citizens.  That sounds like
>> a great plan.
>
> Fabian seems unaware of Wounded Knee where the authorities took guns 
> away from the natives "for their safety and protection" before 
> slaughtering the lot of them.

FR is braindead on this topic. He lives in Never-Never Land where cops are 
always there five minutes before the crime is committed. He's a dipshit.

-- 
The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481574

FromRonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-19 03:25 +0000
Message-ID<pvcdmt$v0p$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#481516
On 2018-12-18, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> F. Russell <fr@random.info> wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 16:01:30 -0800, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> The problems on that page have nothing to do with the 
>>> language that was misused.
>>>
>> 
>> Sure.  The murder rate has also nothing to do with the handguns
>> that were misused.
>> 
>> The fact is that handguns, or firearms in general, have no place
>> in an advanced civilized society.

That's OPINION not fact. Learn the difference, FR.

> Yeah, take away guns from law abiding citizens.  That sounds like
> a great plan.

First thing despotic governments do is disarm the citizenry. Wonder why?

>> The fact is that javashit, or any foreign script/program, has
>> no place executing freely on a client computer.
>> 
>> The solution is blazingly clear: 
>> 
>> Ban handguns.
>> 
>
> Nuking the Democrat-controlled murder zones would be a better plan.
>
>


-- 
The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481585

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-12-19 07:08 -0600
Message-ID<8dgk1ehvnlqi1pusekaleq34qme2p9khpe@4ax.com>
In reply to#481574
RonB wrote:

> owl wrote:
>> F. Russell wrote:
>>> 
>>> The fact is that handguns, or firearms in general, have no place
>>> in an advanced civilized society.
>
>That's OPINION not fact. Learn the difference, FR.
>
>> Yeah, take away guns from law abiding citizens.  That sounds like
>> a great plan.
>
>First thing despotic governments do is disarm the citizenry. Wonder why?

Haha.  You guys are letting Fabian troll you.

At least neither of you has stooped to claiming that he represents
"liberals".

Even those of us who believe that we would be better-off without all
the handguns are smart-enough to understand that it's too late to ban
them.

-- 
'As opposed to sheep minded freetards who are incapable of living in a
universe where someone might actually make a "choice" that's different
from their choice.'  -  trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel", lying shamelessly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481586

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-12-19 07:27 -0600
Message-ID<1khk1ehr3jjaos1b4ilki426qvqftm7tse@4ax.com>
In reply to#481585
chrisv wrote:

>Even those of us who believe that we would be better-off without all
>the handguns are smart-enough to understand that it's too late to ban
>them.

Well, some of us are smart-enough, anyway.

-- 
'Some of the "advocates" are about the same age or even older than
Gates. So why didn't they take the ball and run with it? Why didn't
they even bother trying?'  -  trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481590

Fromfr314159@gmail.com
Date2018-12-19 06:11 -0800
Message-ID<7970ae06-7495-4602-a457-719d460cfd33@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#481585
On Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 8:09:02 AM UTC-5, chrisv wrote:

> 
> At least neither of you has stooped to claiming that he represents
> "liberals".
> 

My disdain of handguns has nothing whatever to with politics.
Handguns, and firearms in general, are indicative of a regressed
mentality.  Only a stupid child could be fascinated by firearms.
To witness a "mature" adult be obsessed with gun ownership is
witnessing a neurotic moron.

Canada and Great Britain have outlawed handguns and the murder
rate is very low compared to the USA.  To commit murder in those
countries one has to get very close to the victim with a knife
and criminal are basically cowards and would be very reluctant
to get up close.

Gun owners are also cowards.

If I were dictator of the world I would confiscate ALL firearms.
Then the deprived owners would wail like a baby deprived of its
pacifier.  Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  What pathetic losers!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481591

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-12-19 08:38 -0600
Message-ID<5slk1elav5ld8f25f1nnjk1j4qc77967ju@4ax.com>
In reply to#481590
fr314159@gmail.com wrote:

>If I were dictator of the world I would confiscate ALL firearms.

Because, then, criminals would be unable to get them.

Just like people are unable to get illegal drugs, today.

-- 
"What Relf said is 100% correct and reasonable."  -  some dumb fsck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481599

Fromfr314159@gmail.com
Date2018-12-19 10:40 -0800
Message-ID<b9e59e70-3b7f-4f0d-98c6-3ea7c2c73232@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#481591
On Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 9:38:54 AM UTC-5, chrisv wrote:

> 
> Because, then, criminals would be unable to get them.
> 
> Just like people are unable to get illegal drugs, today.
> 

Heck.  If I were in charge, I would send the tanks rolling to completely
destroy the firearms factories.

Then I would send the bombers flying to destroy any manufacturing in
other nations.

I would bring back crucifixion and breaking on the wheel as punishments
for all violators.

The NRA would be nailed to a wall and allowed to rot.

If the neurotics want to play then let them find other "toys."

Society would get cleaned up and become safe very fast.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481600

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-12-19 13:43 -0600
Message-ID<gg7l1ehsqfb7m26laurnbogbovmi6dks61@4ax.com>
In reply to#481599
fr314159@gmail.com wrote:

>Society would get cleaned up and become safe very fast.

What makes you think that you'd live long-enough to see that vision
through, assuming that it was possible?

Such an unreasonable dictator would be quickly bumped-off.

Human nature cannot be suppressed via dictate.

-- 
"Additionally, the distribution doesn't automatically select [ext4] as
default. That very fact means that while a Linux distribution might
make it available, it does not offer it."  -  lying propagandist
"Slimer", redefining what it means to "offer" something.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481602

Fromvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Date2018-12-19 21:29 +0000
Message-ID<g7vridFh82hU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#481591
On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:38:52 -0600, chrisv wrote:

> fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
> 
>>If I were dictator of the world I would confiscate ALL firearms.
> 
> Because, then, criminals would be unable to get them.
> 
> Just like people are unable to get illegal drugs, today.

Oh, isn't that precious -- Feeb doesn't think people should have the 
capability of defending themselves with deadly force when necessary.

He's adorable!

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#481603

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-12-19 14:39 -0700
Message-ID<brb3c8.usq.19.3@news.alt.net>
In reply to#481602
On 2018-12-19 2:29 p.m., vallor wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:38:52 -0600, chrisv wrote:
> 
>> fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> If I were dictator of the world I would confiscate ALL firearms.
>>
>> Because, then, criminals would be unable to get them.
>>
>> Just like people are unable to get illegal drugs, today.
> 
> Oh, isn't that precious -- Feeb doesn't think people should have the
> capability of defending themselves with deadly force when necessary.
> 
> He's adorable!
> 
you come at me with deadly force and i'll shoot you

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web