Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #470064 > unrolled thread

Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-10-02 08:36 +0000
    Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 02:05 -0700
    Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 08:00 -0700
      Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-10-02 15:17 +0000
        Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 08:43 -0700
    Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-02 12:21 -0400
      Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-02 12:27 -0400
        Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-02 12:39 -0400
          Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 10:03 -0700
            Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 10:28 -0700
            Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-03 09:30 -0400
      Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 09:34 -0700
        Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 09:41 -0700
        Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-02 23:22 -0400
          Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:49 -0700
          Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 08:31 -0700
            Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-10-03 09:00 -0700
              Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 09:20 -0700
                Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 01:54 -0700
        Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-10-03 09:30 +0000
          Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 04:21 -0700
          Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 08:35 -0700
            Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-10-03 09:03 -0700
            Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-03 10:19 -0700
      Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-10-02 19:08 +0000
        Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-10-02 19:31 +0000
          Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:16 -0700
            Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:05 -0700
          Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-02 22:26 -0400
            Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 19:48 -0700
        Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-10-02 20:03 +0000
          Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-02 22:00 -0400
            Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 19:16 -0700
            Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-10-03 09:19 +0000
              Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 03:04 -0700
              Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 06:54 -0500
              Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:14 +0000
                Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:48 -0500
              Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-03 10:13 -0400
                Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-10-03 09:05 -0700
            Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-10-03 10:20 +0000
              Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 03:50 -0700
          Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-04 09:44 -0400
            Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-11 01:45 +0200
              Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 16:57 -0700
                Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-11 02:00 +0200
                  Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-10 20:08 -0400
                    Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-11 02:18 +0200
                      Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-11 00:00 -0400
                        Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 21:28 -0700
                        Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-11 13:07 +0200
                          Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-11 13:08 +0200
                            Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-11 10:46 -0400
                              Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 08:08 -0700
                              Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 08:53 -0700
                                Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-11 13:27 -0400
                                  Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 10:40 -0700
                                    Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-12 12:40 -0700
                                  Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-12 12:42 -0700
                              Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-12 12:06 +0200
                          Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 04:31 -0700
                          Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-11 06:02 -0700
                            Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-11 15:05 +0200
                        Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-12 12:35 -0700
                          Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-12 12:37 -0700
                        My voice sucks but my nose is whistling. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-14 02:41 -0700
                          Re: My voice sucks but my nose is whistling. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 03:13 -0700
                          Re: My voice sucks but my nose is whistling. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 05:32 -0700
                          Re: My voice sucks but my nose is whistling. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 06:34 -0700
                    Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 17:20 -0700
                      Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 00:52 -0700
                      Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-11 07:15 -0500
                        Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-11 08:16 -0500
                          Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-11 07:54 -0700
                            Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-11 11:44 -0400
                              Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 09:10 -0700
                              Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-11 10:06 -0700
                                Can we agree on this? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-11 12:32 -0500
                                  Re: Can we agree on this? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 10:45 -0700
                                    Stay out of this, "Steve".   chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-11 12:58 -0500
                                      Re: Stay out of this, "Steve". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 11:04 -0700
                                    Re: Can we agree on this? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 10:59 -0700
                                    Re: Can we agree on this? DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-11 15:15 -0400
                                      Re: Can we agree on this? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 12:52 -0700
                                        Re: Can we agree on this? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 13:02 -0700
                                        Re: Can we agree on this? DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-11 18:50 -0400
                                  Re: Can we agree on this? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-11 12:00 -0700
                                    Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-11 14:31 -0500
                                      Re: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-11 14:43 -0500
                                      Re: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 12:56 -0700
                                      Nope, there was an answer ... and it still hasn't changed  (Re: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-11 13:42 -0700
                                      Re: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-12 07:56 -0500
                                        BTDT  (was: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-12 08:14 -0700
                                          Re: BTDT  (was: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 08:34 -0700
                                        Re: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 09:37 -0700
                                      Re: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-12 11:40 -0500
                                        See:  Law of Holes (was: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-12 09:59 -0700
                                        Re: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 10:08 -0700
                                  Re: Can we agree on this? DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-12 20:43 -0400
                                    Re: Can we agree on this? Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-13 06:45 +0200
                                      Re: Can we agree on this? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 22:02 -0700
                                      Re: Can we agree on this? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 23:19 -0700
                                      Re: Can we agree on this? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 02:28 -0700
                          Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-11 19:11 -0400
                            Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 16:39 -0700
                            Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-12 12:05 +0200
                  Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 09:33 -0700
                    Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 10:13 -0700
                    Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-11 12:14 -0500
                      Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 10:19 -0700
                        Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-10-11 13:28 -0400
                      Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 10:28 -0700
              Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-11 07:10 -0500
                Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Silicon Vee <siliconvee1945@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-11 14:15 +0200
                  Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 05:33 -0700
                  Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-10-11 06:07 -0700
        Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:23 -0700
          Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-10-02 21:39 +0000
            Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:46 -0700
              Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-10-02 23:14 +0000
                Re: REAL MAN Linux Scripting Challenge Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 16:41 -0700

Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7  Next page →

#471583 — Re: Stay out of this, "Steve".

On Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 11:58:50 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
> > (snipped, unread)
> 
> When I want your snittish opinion, I'll ask for it.

serious question here:

Has anyone (in your entire life) *ever* cared about what you "want"? 

As crusty as you appear on COLA I'm thinking that's a 'no'. I dunno...
maybe it not you ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471582 — Re: Can we agree on this?

On Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 10:45:40 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 11:32:48 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote:
> > -hh wrote:
> > 
> > > (snipped, unread)
> > 
> > Do you agree, -highhorse, that if I have been completely correct and
> > honest about feedback and my education, that you are a piece of shit,
> > as are the other ignorant, insulting pricks who have attacked me, when
> > I've been right all-along?
> 
> Long ago, I pointed out that there is a scenario where your original 
> claim was correct, one that everyone else seemed to be overlooking 
> (at least I'm the only other poster I ever saw mention it). If you're real 
> nice, maybe DFS can use his DB magic and find it (I've looked, I can't).
> 
> > To respond, _change the subject_ to your _one-word response_: "yes" or
> > "no".
> 
> Stop with that silly sh*t already.



Facts about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll

Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is a nearly 60 year old guy who is single, broke and has no skills. He blames Klaus Schadenfreude for his loss of his wife and girlfriend. Steven is jealous of what Klaus Schadenfreude has and in a narcissistic rage repeatedly works to take it away from him. For over 10 years he has failed at even this. Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is an utter failure in life.

Of his online life Steven says

    I've been booted off by past providers before because people
    complain about me and all my bullshit. I don't want to lose my ISP
    *again* but I still need my army of sock puppets so I continually
    search usenet for whatever servers I haven't yet been booted
    from.
    
Some examples where Steven has been booted

X10 Hosting booted Steven for inappropriate activity
http://tinyurl.com/z92qmz4

Comcast booted Steven for inappropriate activity 
http://tinyurl.com/h75nh9l

FreeHostingEU booted Steven for copyright infringement http://devsite.eu.pn

AwardSpace (atwebpages.com) booted Steven for breaking terms of service
http://demsites.atwebpages.com/pokeman

Imgur took down an image for breaking terms of service http://imgur.com/yv2XppE

Had a GigaNews account which was removed for harassing Klaus Schadenfreude

Stopped posting from his fretwizzen Google account since shortly after I complained. Seems he lost that too.

His wife booted Steven to the curb for cheating on her


    
Only site Steven Petruzzellis has pointed to that has ever been available
http://web.archive.org/web/20161019062351/http://www.oldneighborhoodrestaurant.net/
https://goo.gl/DMno6J

Made by the Go Daddy Website builder and is utter crap. Later he denied he said he was merely taking credit for someone else's work but Steven is the contact person http://tinyurl.com/hcw6dul
http://web.archive.org/web/20161202192456/http://www.reservationdiary.eu/eng/reservation/d76d1156-e9f7-43c1-b77b-b07189857820

He also bragged he was working on an update and showed it here https://vid.me/u6RK

The business still failed.

He likely went to the Go Daddy Website Builder after he failed to get WordPress installed.

https://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic/13879


This is why Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll attacks Klaus Schadenfreude. 


Steven Petruzzellis was is divorced because his wife caught him screwing another woman.

Klaus Schadenfreude is married and by all appearances happily so. 
He never complains about his wife in COLA.


Steven Petruzzellis is living on charity of a friend in a single room.

Klaus Schadenfreude does not live in a mansion or even a high end home but has a house and a yard.


Steven Petruzzellis has two kids but no respect. He repeatedly called Ryan his "little screwup" and refers to his son Steve as a "dick" and worse. He says at least one of them likely hacked his computer and is a "mentally deficient child." He mocks his possible future daughter-in-law as someone who takes too many selfies and is focused only on herself

Klaus Schadenfreude has two kids (or more) and never speaks poorly of them in public. 
No reason to think they are not a happy family.


Steven Petruzzellis claims to be a stay at home dad who pays thousands of dollars for day care. Steven has no job and no purpose in life. Steven has given up and now seeks a mother-figure to date. 

Klaus Schadenfreude has his own business doing technical work and also teaches. 
Klaus Schadenfreude offers a true contribution to society. 
Teachers are truly under appreciated.

- 
Live on Kickstarter!
http://www.5z8.info/creditscore_g7f8du_launchexe
https://youtu.be/TETJEkaUoY4
http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/BilkHelp.html
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471588 — Re: Can we agree on this?

On 10/11/2018 1:45 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 11:32:48 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote:
>> -hh wrote:
>>
>>> (snipped, unread)
>>
>> Do you agree, -highhorse, that if I have been completely correct and
>> honest about feedback and my education, that you are a piece of shit,
>> as are the other ignorant, insulting pricks who have attacked me, when
>> I've been right all-along?
> 
> Long ago, I pointed out that there is a scenario where your original
> claim was correct, one that everyone else seemed to be overlooking
> (at least I'm the only other poster I ever saw mention it). If you're real
> nice, maybe DFS can use his DB magic and find it (I've looked, I can't).


<b44fb270-f04a-47b4-9942-1bb5ca709a47@v15g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>  maybe?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471593 — Re: Can we agree on this?

On Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 1:15:31 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote:
> On 10/11/2018 1:45 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 11:32:48 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote:
> >> -hh wrote:
> >>
> >>> (snipped, unread)
> >>
> >> Do you agree, -highhorse, that if I have been completely correct and
> >> honest about feedback and my education, that you are a piece of shit,
> >> as are the other ignorant, insulting pricks who have attacked me, when
> >> I've been right all-along?
> > 
> > Long ago, I pointed out that there is a scenario where your original
> > claim was correct, one that everyone else seemed to be overlooking
> > (at least I'm the only other poster I ever saw mention it). If you're real
> > nice, maybe DFS can use his DB magic and find it (I've looked, I can't).
> 
> 
> <b44fb270-f04a-47b4-9942-1bb5ca709a47@v15g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>  maybe?

COLA's statistician does it again!

Honor and honesty time: 
I actually didn't look but I figured that blurb would prompt you to ;)

What did you search on, his quote and me as the author?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471595 — Re: Can we agree on this?

On Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 12:52:24 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 1:15:31 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote:
> > On 10/11/2018 1:45 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > > On Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 11:32:48 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote:
> > >> -hh wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> (snipped, unread)
> > >>
> > >> Do you agree, -highhorse, that if I have been completely correct and
> > >> honest about feedback and my education, that you are a piece of shit,
> > >> as are the other ignorant, insulting pricks who have attacked me, when
> > >> I've been right all-along?
> > > 
> > > Long ago, I pointed out that there is a scenario where your original
> > > claim was correct, one that everyone else seemed to be overlooking
> > > (at least I'm the only other poster I ever saw mention it). If you're real
> > > nice, maybe DFS can use his DB magic and find it (I've looked, I can't).
> > 
> > 
> > <b44fb270-f04a-47b4-9942-1bb5ca709a47@v15g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>  maybe?
> 
> COLA's statistician does it again!
> 
> Honor and honesty time: 
> I actually didn't look but I figured that blurb would prompt you to ;)
> 
> What did you search on, his quote and me as the author?



With no evidence at all, as is the norm for Meat. Sheer BS by an ignorant, misleading, slippery, conspiring birdbrain who would not tell the truth even if you paid him to. I've worked for the retail business for nearly 45 years. I have done business with Fortune 500 businesses working with NASA and the health industry. Never, not at any time, was I under a contractual obligation to not load any other OS. We sold Unix, Sun, MINIX, etc. as well as Windows with no issues. 

Dropping support for System76 is common sense. 



-- 
Live on Kickstarter
https://www.facebook.com/jenny.eklund
http://www.5z8.info/hack-outlook_c6c9in_michaelangelo-virus
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.os.linux/BVpdH5KOc6s
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471608 — Re: Can we agree on this?

On 10/11/2018 3:52 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 1:15:31 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote:
>> On 10/11/2018 1:45 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 11:32:48 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote:
>>>> -hh wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> (snipped, unread)
>>>>
>>>> Do you agree, -highhorse, that if I have been completely correct and
>>>> honest about feedback and my education, that you are a piece of shit,
>>>> as are the other ignorant, insulting pricks who have attacked me, when
>>>> I've been right all-along?
>>>
>>> Long ago, I pointed out that there is a scenario where your original
>>> claim was correct, one that everyone else seemed to be overlooking
>>> (at least I'm the only other poster I ever saw mention it). If you're real
>>> nice, maybe DFS can use his DB magic and find it (I've looked, I can't).
>>
>>
>> <b44fb270-f04a-47b4-9942-1bb5ca709a47@v15g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>  maybe?
> 
> COLA's statistician does it again!
> 
> Honor and honesty time:
> I actually didn't look but I figured that blurb would prompt you to ;)

"db magic" = trigger words



> What did you search on, his quote and me as the author?

group : cola
author: Steve Carroll
dates : your first post thru today
phrase: "negative feedback"
location: body of post

Got one hit in 0.35s

Bit of luck - you had quoted 'negative feedback'.  It's not always so 
easy to find a particular post, by any means.

One fun feature in my system is the ability to see every post made 
between any 2 people.  You and shitv have 301 exchanges going back to 
Mar 17 2005 (which doesn't include a few 3rd party replies he made to 
you - the sniveling sewer rat loves to snivel at others from behind 
someone else's nym - he does it to this very day).

Two of shitv's first four replies to you were *plonks*, and he's 
*plonked* you 5x total.  What an idiot.

You and I have 1847 exchanges going back to Jun 2011.  Sadly, 421 of 
them contain 'Snit'  (something weird just happened: that 421 search 
took 6.86 seconds, and Snit's main POSTERID is 686.  spooky!)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471587 — Re: Can we agree on this?

On Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 1:32:48 PM UTC-4, chrisv wrote:
> -hh wrote:
> 
> > (snipped, unread)

Golly gee ... if chrisv didn't read it, then just how does he
know *if* I was even talking about his education to have then 
make his subsequent statement?

 
> Do you agree, -highhorse, that if I have been completely 
> correct and honest about feedback and my education, that
> you are a piece of shit, as are the other ignorant, insulting
> pricks who have attacked me, when I've been right all-along?

Looks like someone flunked English class on how to structure
a clear & understandable conditional statement!  

Case in point, are the multiple phrases within the above "if" 
statement conditionally linked with logical "and's", or are 
they to use logical "or's"?  

 
> To respond, _change the subject_ to your _one-word response_: 
> "yes" or "no".


Given the above crap-for-logic, I shouldn't commit to either.

Now since chrisv left the interpretational barn door wide open, 
I'm going to apply parsing as follows:

"Do you agree, -highhorse, that [if] I have been completely 
correct [and] honest about feedback [and] my education, [that]
you are a piece of shit, [missing] as are the other ignorant, 
[missing] insulting pricks who have attacked me, [missing]
when I've been right all-along?

Replacing [that] with [then] for a classical if-then, the 
question is if chrisv has been:

(a) completely correct, and:
(b) honest about feedback, and:
(c) honest about his education

...in order for the subsequent "then" condition(s) to apply.

Since chrisv hasn't been honest about what University he attended 
(because this denies us from being able to determine if he went 
to a legitimate, accredited school, let alone confirm that he 
did actually attend), it is trivial to conclude (c) as false.  

And since one only needs to debunk any one of these three (a-c) 
conditions in order to logically invalidate his premise, we 
don't even have to bother to consider any of the rest.


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471590 — Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts

-hh wrote:

> chrisv wrote:
>>
>>Do you agree, -highhorse, that if I have been completely correct and
>>honest about feedback and my education, that you are a piece of shit,
>>as are the other ignorant, insulting pricks who have attacked me, when
>>I've been right all-along?
>>
>>To respond, _change the subject_ to your _one-word response_: "yes" or
>>"no".
>
> (snipped, unread)

-highhorse lacks the guts to put his soul where his lying asshole
mouth is, apparently.

I think that tells us what we need to know.

Hopefully, there was not any lying about me being "the bad guy",
unwilling to read, discuss, and come to an understanding.  I explained
plenty, and provided copious and irrefutable evidence, years ago.  Not
once, have trolls demonstrated a desire to understand.  Trolls only
demonstrated that they wanted to attack and insult.  -highhorse maybe
the shittiest of them all, on this issue.

(Watch for accusations of my "self nuke" if the above paragraph was
spot-on in addressing where I thought the lying asshole might retreat.
It's not that I'm smarter and better than -highhorse.  It's that I'm
ridiculous-enough to read a post, lie about not reading it, and then
respond to it.  (Why anyone would do that, I don't know.))

Whether or not you agree to the above question, -highhorse, I know
what I am, and I know what you are.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471592 — Re: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts

chrisv wrote:

>-hh wrote:
>
>> chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>>Do you agree, -highhorse, that if I have been completely correct and
>>>honest about feedback and my education, that you are a piece of shit,
>>>as are the other ignorant, insulting pricks who have attacked me, when
>>>I've been right all-along?
>>>
>>>To respond, _change the subject_ to your _one-word response_: "yes" or
>>>"no".
>>
>> (snipped, unread)
>
>-highhorse lacks the guts to put his soul where his lying asshole
>mouth is, apparently.
>
>I think that tells us what we need to know.
>
>Hopefully, there was not any lying about me being "the bad guy",
>unwilling to read, discuss, and come to an understanding.  I explained
>plenty, and provided copious and irrefutable evidence, years ago.  Not
>once, have trolls demonstrated a desire to understand.  Trolls only
>demonstrated that they wanted to attack and insult.  -highhorse maybe
>the shittiest of them all, on this issue.
>
>(Watch for accusations of my "self nuke" if the above paragraph was
>spot-on in addressing where I thought the lying asshole might retreat.
>It's not that I'm smarter and better than -highhorse.  It's that I'm
>ridiculous-enough to read a post, lie about not reading it, and then
>respond to it.  (Why anyone would do that, I don't know.))
>
>Whether or not you agree to the above question, -highhorse, I know
>what I am, and I know what you are.

Of course, all troll responses to this and the above post will be
deleted, unread.

Unless -highhorse conjures-up some guts and changes the subject
appropriately.

How you pricks sleep at night, is a bit of a wonder.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471594 — Re: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts

On Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 1:31:12 PM UTC-6, chrisv wrote:
> -hh wrote:
> 
> > chrisv wrote:
> >>
> >>Do you agree, -highhorse, that if I have been completely correct and
> >>honest about feedback and my education, that you are a piece of shit,
> >>as are the other ignorant, insulting pricks who have attacked me, when
> >>I've been right all-along?
> >>
> >>To respond, _change the subject_ to your _one-word response_: "yes" or
> >>"no".
> >
> > (snipped, unread)
> 
> -highhorse lacks the guts to

Please... while you may disagree with him on things, *he* is not the
one lacking guts here, princess. Snap out of this 'just getting my 1st 
period' phase and recognize how embarrassing this sh*t is. Either
answer him without the Red Tent crap or ignore him.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471598 — Nope, there was an answer ... and it still hasn't changed (Re: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts)

On Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 3:31:12 PM UTC-4, chrisv wrote:
> -hh wrote:
> 
> > chrisv wrote:
> >>
> >>Do you agree, -highhorse, that if I have been completely correct and
> >>honest about feedback and my education, that you are a piece of shit,
> >>as are the other ignorant, insulting pricks who have attacked me, when
> >>I've been right all-along?
> >>
> >>To respond, _change the subject_ to your _one-word response_: "yes" or
> >>"no".
> >
> > (snipped, unread)
> 
> -highhorse lacks the guts to put his soul where his lying asshole
> mouth is, apparently.

Too bad chrisv didn't bring himself to read the content...

...and is such a gutless snowflake that he also left himself
an escape with an "apparently".

 
> I think that tells us what we need to know.

Those who read the content know better.

 
> Hopefully, there was not any lying about me being "the bad guy",
> unwilling to read, discuss, and come to an understanding.

No, it was quite specific in how you've not been honest.


>  I explained plenty, and provided copious and irrefutable 
> evidence, years ago. 

Unfortunately for you, its trivial to have made a copy of your
content where you were deficient, such that you can't later deny it.


> (Watch for accusations of my "self nuke" if the above paragraph was
> spot-on in addressing where I thought the lying asshole might retreat.

Nope, no retreat.


> It's not that I'm smarter and better than -highhorse.  

Of course its not, because that claim has never been substantiated.

  
> It's that I'm ridiculous-enough to read a post, lie about not
> reading it, and then respond to it.  (Why anyone would do that,
> I don't know.))

Not so ridiculous when one realizes emotional factors such as an
inferiority complex; overinflated ego; general frustration for not
having succeeded in life, etc. 


> Whether or not you agree to the above question, -highhorse, I 
> know what I am, and I know what you are.

Oh, please.  If you really knew (as you've just claimed), then you 
wouldn't have bragged about having only a Bachelor's Degree.  


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471676 — Re: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts

chrisv wrote:

>-highhorse lacks the guts to put his soul where his lying asshole
>mouth is, apparently.
>
>I think that tells us what we need to know.
>
>Hopefully, there was not any lying about me being "the bad guy",
>unwilling to read, discuss, and come to an understanding.  I explained
>plenty, and provided copious and irrefutable evidence, years ago.  Not
>once, have trolls demonstrated a desire to understand.  Trolls only
>demonstrated that they wanted to attack and insult.  -highhorse maybe
>the shittiest of them all, on this issue.

In <fee6a9fb-945b-4c3a-85c9-0808d747a361@googlegroups.com>, the
gutless -highhorse states: "Nope, there was an answer ... and it still
hasn't changed."  His post was, of course, deleted, unread.

I suppose that -highhorse is claiming that I didn't prove my case.
But that would be a lie, and the act of a gutless coward.  All by
itself, the photo that I posted of my college textbook proved that I
was correct.  I also referenced substantial online support for my
position.

Come on, gutless.  Take a stand (and put it in subject, where I will
see it).  

At least, admit that you don't know, in which case you should have
kept your ignorant ass out of the discussion in the first place,
instead of leaping to attack, because you're a lying asshole who tries
to tear-down those who are better than you.

-- 
'Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is
not one of them.  Just the opposite, in fact.  The more negative
feedback there is, the greater the chance of *instability*.'  -
chrisv, BSEE, 100% correct

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471687 — BTDT (was: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts)

On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 8:56:39 AM UTC-4, chrisv wrote:
> chrisv wrote:
> 
> >-highhorse lacks the guts to put his soul where his lying asshole
> >mouth is, apparently.
> >
> >I think that tells us what we need to know.
> >
> >Hopefully, there was not any lying about me being "the bad guy",
> >unwilling to read, discuss, and come to an understanding.  I explained
> >plenty, and provided copious and irrefutable evidence, years ago.  Not
> >once, have trolls demonstrated a desire to understand.  Trolls only
> >demonstrated that they wanted to attack and insult.  -highhorse maybe
> >the shittiest of them all, on this issue.
> 
> In <fee6a9fb-945b-4c3a-85c9-0808d747a361@googlegroups.com>, the
> gutless -highhorse states: "Nope, there was an answer ... and it still
> hasn't changed."  His post was, of course, deleted, unread.

Because chrisv can't confront the truth when it shows he's wrong.
 
> I suppose that -highhorse is claiming that I didn't prove my case.

Too bad chrisv didn't read the response, because it detailed
just where chrisv has failed.

> But that would be a lie, and the act of a gutless coward.  All by
> itself, the photo that I posted of my college textbook proved that I
> was correct.  I also referenced substantial online support for my
> position.

But we still don't know just what College chrisv attended, to be
able to (a) ascertain if its actually an accredited school, or
just some fly-by-night POS; (b) confirm if he actually was a
graduate, of if that recused diploma was a GIMP-created fake, etc.

As such, chrisv hasn't been _honest_ with COLA. 

 
> Come on, gutless.  Take a stand (and put it in subject, where I will
> see it).  

Already done ... hence, "Been There, Done That" (BTDT).



> At least, admit that you don't know, in which case you should have
> kept your ignorant ass out of the discussion in the first place,
> instead of leaping to attack, because you're a lying asshole who tries
> to tear-down those who are better than you.

Speaking of which, *you* made another claim which you've failed
to back up.  This was also detailed in my prior post.  Consider
this to be a "Cite, please ... second request", even though we
all know that you'll once again BRAVELY dodge! 


> 'Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" 
> is not one of them.  Just the opposite, in fact.  The more negative
> feedback there is, the greater the chance of *instability*.'  -
> chrisv, BSEE, 100% correct

FWIW, courtesy of the reference just posted, I went back to read 
again just what Steve commented on this claim by chrisv.  It 
appears that what he was pointing out to chrisv (which of course 
never got answered) is that chrisv was trying to effectively use 
a fringe case to misrepresent the general condition.

The reality of negative feedback is that it is regularly employed 
to target a signal to a desired value, as its nature is to actively 
resist change or perturbations.  Just how 'stable' a signal appears
to be is largely a question of the design of the negative feedback
loop, which includes not only the strength of the feedback, but
also the magnitude of signal dampening present.  

Thus, all that chrisv pointed out was that it is possible to have
a poor design.  Specifically, to use a 'strong' signal without also 
including adequate dampening.  With an underdamped circuit, you'll 
have overshoots & rebounds, which is what leads to higher risks of 
instability and oscillations.

The solution is simple:  don't use an underdamped design.  

Hint: there's a reason why the term "critical dampening" exists:
<http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/oscda2.html>



-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471689 — Re: BTDT (was: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts)

On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 8:14:59 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
> On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 8:56:39 AM UTC-4, chrisv wrote:
> > chrisv wrote:
> > 
> > >-highhorse lacks the guts to put his soul where his lying asshole
> > >mouth is, apparently.
> > >
> > >I think that tells us what we need to know.
> > >
> > >Hopefully, there was not any lying about me being "the bad guy",
> > >unwilling to read, discuss, and come to an understanding.  I explained
> > >plenty, and provided copious and irrefutable evidence, years ago.  Not
> > >once, have trolls demonstrated a desire to understand.  Trolls only
> > >demonstrated that they wanted to attack and insult.  -highhorse maybe
> > >the shittiest of them all, on this issue.
> > 
> > In <fee6a9fb-945b-4c3a-85c9-0808d747a361@googlegroups.com>, the
> > gutless -highhorse states: "Nope, there was an answer ... and it still
> > hasn't changed."  His post was, of course, deleted, unread.
> 
> Because chrisv can't confront the truth when it shows he's wrong.
>  
> > I suppose that -highhorse is claiming that I didn't prove my case.
> 
> Too bad chrisv didn't read the response, because it detailed
> just where chrisv has failed.
> 
> > But that would be a lie, and the act of a gutless coward.  All by
> > itself, the photo that I posted of my college textbook proved that I
> > was correct.  I also referenced substantial online support for my
> > position.
> 
> But we still don't know just what College chrisv attended, to be
> able to (a) ascertain if its actually an accredited school, or
> just some fly-by-night POS; (b) confirm if he actually was a
> graduate, of if that recused diploma was a GIMP-created fake, etc.
> 
> As such, chrisv hasn't been _honest_ with COLA. 
> 
>  
> > Come on, gutless.  Take a stand (and put it in subject, where I will
> > see it).  
> 
> Already done ... hence, "Been There, Done That" (BTDT).
> 
> 
> 
> > At least, admit that you don't know, in which case you should have
> > kept your ignorant ass out of the discussion in the first place,
> > instead of leaping to attack, because you're a lying asshole who tries
> > to tear-down those who are better than you.
> 
> Speaking of which, *you* made another claim which you've failed
> to back up.  This was also detailed in my prior post.  Consider
> this to be a "Cite, please ... second request", even though we
> all know that you'll once again BRAVELY dodge! 
> 
> 
> > 'Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" 
> > is not one of them.  Just the opposite, in fact.  The more negative
> > feedback there is, the greater the chance of *instability*.'  -
> > chrisv, BSEE, 100% correct
> 
> FWIW, courtesy of the reference just posted, I went back to read 
> again just what Steve commented on this claim by chrisv.  It 
> appears that what he was pointing out to chrisv (which of course 
> never got answered) is that chrisv was trying to effectively use 
> a fringe case to misrepresent the general condition.
> 
> The reality of negative feedback is that it is regularly employed 
> to target a signal to a desired value, as its nature is to actively 
> resist change or perturbations.  Just how 'stable' a signal appears
> to be is largely a question of the design of the negative feedback
> loop, which includes not only the strength of the feedback, but
> also the magnitude of signal dampening present.  
> 
> Thus, all that chrisv pointed out was that it is possible to have
> a poor design.  Specifically, to use a 'strong' signal without also 
> including adequate dampening.  With an underdamped circuit, you'll 
> have overshoots & rebounds, which is what leads to higher risks of 
> instability and oscillations.
> 
> The solution is simple:  don't use an underdamped design.  
> 
> Hint: there's a reason why the term "critical dampening" exists:
> <http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/oscda2.html>
> 
> 
> 
> -hh



Nobody is being controlled by the MSM. Anyone familiar with my posts knows it is not written in the way John Gohde is implying, and some of them are of course hand written. 

What it looks like can be skinned and then it is not like GNU/Linux, especially if it's web based. I'm getting a lot of killed files. I'm guessing the sock frenzy circus has gone ballistic again. My killfiles have him/her/it completely shut out. And you do realize that it isn't impossible for Klaus Schadenfreude to be doing this, or working with one of his old students who knows what they are doing. 

--
My Snoring Solution
https://redd.it/6sfkup
https://youtu.be/OffkiSAsYo8
https://youtu.be/iztSc_msHuo
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471694 — Re: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts

On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 5:56:39 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> chrisv wrote:
> 
> >-highhorse lacks the guts to put his soul where his lying asshole
> >mouth is, apparently.
> >
> >I think that tells us what we need to know.
> >
> >Hopefully, there was not any lying about me being "the bad guy",
> >unwilling to read, discuss, and come to an understanding.  I explained
> >plenty, and provided copious and irrefutable evidence, years ago.  Not
> >once, have trolls demonstrated a desire to understand.  Trolls only
> >demonstrated that they wanted to attack and insult.  -highhorse maybe
> >the shittiest of them all, on this issue.
> 
> In <fee6a9fb-945b-4c3a-85c9-0808d747a361@googlegroups.com>, the
> gutless -highhorse states: "Nope, there was an answer ... and it still
> hasn't changed."  His post was, of course, deleted, unread.
> 
> I suppose that -highhorse is claiming that I didn't prove my case.
> But that would be a lie, and the act of a gutless coward.  All by
> itself, the photo that I posted of my college textbook proved that I
> was correct.  I also referenced substantial online support for my
> position.
> 
> Come on, gutless.  Take a stand (and put it in subject, where I will
> see it).  
> 
> At least, admit that you don't know, in which case you should have
> kept your ignorant ass out of the discussion in the first place,
> instead of leaping to attack, because you're a lying asshole who tries
> to tear-down those who are better than you.
> 
> -- 
> 'Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is
> not one of them.  Just the opposite, in fact.  The more negative
> feedback there is, the greater the chance of *instability*.'  -
> chrisv, BSEE, 100% correct



Lying sack of shit AKA Larry 'The Shill' Washington does it every time. Then the deluge begins. Because the sissy just has to run to other groups to get the attention he's not getting here. 

The majority of posters in this group do programming either as a pastime or as a trade, so I am skeptical anyone here thinks of writing macros to be "witch craft". I am a total fanboi of Red Hat, because that's where all the compelling modernization is happening. 

--
This broke the Internet!!
http://www.5z8.info/mydick_x6g9hr_nakedgrandmas.jpg
http://tinyurl.com/kmqe66h
http://www.5z8.info/backyard-fireworks-disasters_t7w7pu_bombbuilding
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471695 — Re: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts

chrisv wrote:

>-highhorse lacks the guts to put his soul where his lying asshole
>mouth is, apparently.
>
>I think that tells us what we need to know.
>
>Hopefully, there was not any lying about me being "the bad guy",
>unwilling to read, discuss, and come to an understanding.  I explained
>plenty, and provided copious and irrefutable evidence, years ago.  Not
>once, have trolls demonstrated a desire to understand.  Trolls only
>demonstrated that they wanted to attack and insult.  -highhorse maybe
>the shittiest of them all, on this issue.

In <be1a1cc4-40f2-495d-9d37-aa2fbc95a746@googlegroups.com>, the
gutless -highhorse states: "BTDT", but I don't know what that refers
to.  It's probably a lie anyway, knowing -highhorse.

This is obviously a waste of time.  -highhorse is a gutless, lying
coward, and he probably always will be.  I doubt that he has the
courage to answer my "if I have been completely correct and honest"
question to himself, much less to the group.

The answer is "yes", by the way.

-- 
'Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is
not one of them.  Just the opposite, in fact.  The more negative
feedback there is, the greater the chance of *instability*.'  -
chrisv, BSEE, 100% correct

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471697 — See: Law of Holes (was: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts)

On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 12:40:47 PM UTC-4, chrisv wrote:
> chrisv wrote:
> 
> >-highhorse lacks the guts to put his soul where his lying asshole
> >mouth is, apparently.
> >
> >I think that tells us what we need to know.
> >
> >Hopefully, there was not any lying about me being "the bad guy",
> >unwilling to read, discuss, and come to an understanding.  I explained
> >plenty, and provided copious and irrefutable evidence, years ago.  Not
> >once, have trolls demonstrated a desire to understand.  Trolls only
> >demonstrated that they wanted to attack and insult.  -highhorse maybe
> >the shittiest of them all, on this issue.
> 
> In <be1a1cc4-40f2-495d-9d37-aa2fbc95a746@googlegroups.com>, the
> gutless -highhorse states: "BTDT", but I don't know what that refers
> to.  It's probably a lie anyway, knowing -highhorse.

Good news then that post's content clearly explains it.  

"There are none so blind as those who will not see. The most 
deluded people are those who choose to ignore what they already
know."
 - John Heywood (1546)


> This is obviously a waste of time. 

"The first law of holes, or the law of holes, is an adage which 
states that 'if you find yourself in a hole, stop digging'".

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_holes>


> -highhorse is a gutless, lying coward, and he probably
> always will be. 

Ironic claim from an anonymous account.


> I doubt that he has the courage to answer my "if I have
> been completely correct and honest" question to himself,
> much less to the group.

Except for how it has already been answered ... twice. 
That's why the second time was noted as "BTDT".  

 
> The answer is "yes", by the way.

Still incorrect.  



-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471698 — Re: Apparently, -highhorse lacks the guts

On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 9:40:47 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> chrisv wrote:
> 
> >-highhorse lacks the guts to put his soul where his lying asshole
> >mouth is, apparently.
> >
> >I think that tells us what we need to know.
> >
> >Hopefully, there was not any lying about me being "the bad guy",
> >unwilling to read, discuss, and come to an understanding.  I explained
> >plenty, and provided copious and irrefutable evidence, years ago.  Not
> >once, have trolls demonstrated a desire to understand.  Trolls only
> >demonstrated that they wanted to attack and insult.  -highhorse maybe
> >the shittiest of them all, on this issue.
> 
> In <be1a1cc4-40f2-495d-9d37-aa2fbc95a746@googlegroups.com>, the
> gutless -highhorse states: "BTDT", but I don't know what that refers
> to.  It's probably a lie anyway, knowing -highhorse.
> 
> This is obviously a waste of time.  -highhorse is a gutless, lying
> coward, and he probably always will be.  I doubt that he has the
> courage to answer my "if I have been completely correct and honest"
> question to himself, much less to the group.
> 
> The answer is "yes", by the way.
> 
> -- 
> 'Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is
> not one of them.  Just the opposite, in fact.  The more negative
> feedback there is, the greater the chance of *instability*.'  -
> chrisv, BSEE, 100% correct



And why the added need to recode into WebAssembly via ODBC connectivity in a web based system? Of course, he didn't initially list this as part of his inevitably continually changing 'needs'. You've proven nothing. The only way that I could overlook OS X's constant need for fixing because of dependency dilemmas or goofy design flaws is if I consumed the regular number of delusion its developers have been feeding Steve Petruzzellis since 2005.Any horribly obsessive welfare receiver could easily do the same. Are you being stupid on purpose? 



-- 
Do not click this link!!
http://www.5z8.info/dont-just-drizzle_y8q4ut_5waystokillwithamelon
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471759 — Re: Can we agree on this?

On 10/11/2018 1:32 PM, shit("I have a BSEE")v wrote:

> ... if I have been completely correct and honest about feedback ....

You being correct about negative feedback is a big, fat NO:


1. Wikipedia:
"negative feedback generally promotes stability"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_feedback

2. Wikipedia:
"Positive feedback tends to cause system instability."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_feedback

3. textbook:
"negative voltage feedback increases circuit stability"
http://books.google.com/books?id=TUhLAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA1049&lpg=PA1049#v=onepage&q&f=false

4. research paper, pg 94
"The negative feedback helps to maintain stability in a system
in spite of external changes."
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1100534/files/p73.pdf

5. What Science is and How It Works, pg 297
"Negative feedback, on the other hand, usually leads to stability.
Because it provides stability, negative feedback is often used in
engineering control systems."
http://books.google.com/books?id=Dk-xS6nABrYC&pg=PA297&lpg=PA297#v=onepage&q&f=false

6. Article about testing power supplies
"Power supplies employ negative feedback from the output back to an
error amplifier to ensure proper regulation over various operating
conditions"
http://www.edn.com/design/power-management/4412230/Testing-a-power-supply---Stability--Part-three-

7. Electropaedia
"negative feedback systems... allow the user to set a desired operating
state as a target or reference and the control system will automatically
move the system to the desired operating point and maintain it at that
point thereafter."
http://www.mpoweruk.com/motorcontrols.htm

8. MIT
"To make systems stable, we use Negative Feedback"
http://web.mit.edu/jamwno/Public/UAT/Jim_Feedback.ppt

9. MIT
"Since it's hard to make the op-amp gain stable over all operating
conditions negative feedback is used to stabilize the op-amp"
http://www.mit.edu/~godoy/6098/study/review_all.pdf

10. Oxford University
"Negative feedback is a central concept in the design of linear
amplifiers. It enables them to be designed with predictable, precise and
stable performance."
http://www-teaching.physics.ox.ac.uk/practical_course/ELManCh14.pdf

11. Princeton University
"Black used negative feedback, which reduces the gain but makes the
amplifier insensitive to variations in tube characteristics. This
invention made it possible to build stable amplifiers with linear
characteristics..."
http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/s9493.pdf

12. "While positive feedback drives an amplifier circuit toward a
point of instability (oscillations), negative feedback drives it the
opposite direction: toward a point of stability."
http://openbookproject.net/electricCircuits/Semi/SEMI_4.html#xtocid209015

13. "We have already talked about FEEDBACK in terms of NEGATIVE FEEDBACK 
to stabilize a circuit."
http://www.talkingelectronics.com/projects/TheTransistorAmplifier/TheTransistorAmplifier-P1.html




turdv, standing alone:
"Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not
one of them. Just the opposite, in fact."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#471785 — Re: Can we agree on this?

DFS <nospam@nospam.com> writes:

> On 10/11/2018 1:32 PM, shit("I have a BSEE")v wrote:
>
>> ... if I have been completely correct and honest about feedback ....
>
> You being correct about negative feedback is a big, fat NO:
>
>
> 1. Wikipedia:
> "negative feedback generally promotes stability"
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_feedback
>
> 2. Wikipedia:
> "Positive feedback tends to cause system instability."
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_feedback
>
> 3. textbook:
> "negative voltage feedback increases circuit stability"
> http://books.google.com/books?id=TUhLAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA1049&lpg=PA1049#v=onepage&q&f=false
>
> 4. research paper, pg 94
> "The negative feedback helps to maintain stability in a system
> in spite of external changes."
> http://cds.cern.ch/record/1100534/files/p73.pdf
>
> 5. What Science is and How It Works, pg 297
> "Negative feedback, on the other hand, usually leads to stability.
> Because it provides stability, negative feedback is often used in
> engineering control systems."
> http://books.google.com/books?id=Dk-xS6nABrYC&pg=PA297&lpg=PA297#v=onepage&q&f=false
>
> 6. Article about testing power supplies
> "Power supplies employ negative feedback from the output back to an
> error amplifier to ensure proper regulation over various operating
> conditions"
> http://www.edn.com/design/power-management/4412230/Testing-a-power-supply---Stability--Part-three-
>
> 7. Electropaedia
> "negative feedback systems... allow the user to set a desired operating
> state as a target or reference and the control system will automatically
> move the system to the desired operating point and maintain it at that
> point thereafter."
> http://www.mpoweruk.com/motorcontrols.htm
>
> 8. MIT
> "To make systems stable, we use Negative Feedback"
> http://web.mit.edu/jamwno/Public/UAT/Jim_Feedback.ppt
>
> 9. MIT
> "Since it's hard to make the op-amp gain stable over all operating
> conditions negative feedback is used to stabilize the op-amp"
> http://www.mit.edu/~godoy/6098/study/review_all.pdf
>
> 10. Oxford University
> "Negative feedback is a central concept in the design of linear
> amplifiers. It enables them to be designed with predictable, precise and
> stable performance."
> http://www-teaching.physics.ox.ac.uk/practical_course/ELManCh14.pdf
>
> 11. Princeton University
> "Black used negative feedback, which reduces the gain but makes the
> amplifier insensitive to variations in tube characteristics. This
> invention made it possible to build stable amplifiers with linear
> characteristics..."
> http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/s9493.pdf
>
> 12. "While positive feedback drives an amplifier circuit toward a
> point of instability (oscillations), negative feedback drives it the
> opposite direction: toward a point of stability."
> http://openbookproject.net/electricCircuits/Semi/SEMI_4.html#xtocid209015
>
> 13. "We have already talked about FEEDBACK in terms of NEGATIVE FEEDBACK to
> stabilize a circuit."
> http://www.talkingelectronics.com/projects/TheTransistorAmplifier/TheTransistorAmplifier-P1.html
>
>
>
>
> turdv, standing alone:
> "Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not
> one of them. Just the opposite, in fact."
>

The turd does not have a degree in EE if he thinks this. It's
impossible.


-- 
any of the subatomic particles (such as protons and neutrons) that are
made up of quarks and are subject to the strong force.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web