Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #330418 > unrolled thread

A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-02 13:49 -0500
    Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 13:52 -0500
    Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-02 13:04 -0600
      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 19:10 +0000
        Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-02 14:22 -0500
          Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 19:41 +0000
          Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 14:52 -0500
        Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-02 18:29 -0500
          Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 18:54 -0500
          Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 19:40 -0600
            Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-03 08:25 -0600
              Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-03 08:27 -0600
            Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-03 10:51 -0500
              Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-03 13:07 -0600
                Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-03 14:48 -0500
          Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 08:05 -0500
            Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:17 -0500
              Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-03 10:55 -0500
                Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 11:28 -0500
                  Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-03 14:53 -0500
                    Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 14:11 -0600
                      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 15:37 -0500
                        Congrats JEDIDIAH - The most ignorant statement of 2015 "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-04 16:14 -0500
                          Re: Congrats JEDIDIAH - The most ignorant statement of 2015 Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 16:38 -0500
                            Re: Congrats JEDIDIAH - The most ignorant statement of 2015 "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-04 16:47 -0500
                              Re: Congrats JEDIDIAH - The most ignorant statement of 2015 Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 16:49 -0500
                      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 13:21 -0800
                        Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 16:39 -0500
                          Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 17:43 -0500
                            Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-04 17:54 -0500
                              Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 18:44 -0500
                                Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 18:46 -0500
                      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-05 13:27 -0500
                        Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-05 14:00 -0600
                          You are nutso.  LMFAO!!!! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-05 13:48 -0700
                          Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-05 15:50 -0500
                            Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-05 15:16 -0600
                              Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-05 16:37 -0500
                                Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-05 22:40 +0100
                                  Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-05 17:23 -0500
                                  Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-05 17:46 -0500
                                  Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-05 19:58 -0500
                                    Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-05 21:19 -0500
                                  Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-06 06:47 -0600
                                    Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-06 07:05 -0600
                                      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-07 09:17 -0500
                                        Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 09:28 -0500
                                          Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-09 10:03 -0500
                                            Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-09 10:06 -0500
                                            Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 15:09 +0000
                                        Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-07 09:47 -0500
                                    Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-06 09:40 -0500
                                      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-06 09:49 -0500
                                        Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-06 11:03 -0500
                                      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-07 09:18 -0500
                                        Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-07 09:48 -0500
                                          Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-09 10:15 -0500
                                        Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 10:21 -0500
                                          Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-09 10:06 -0500
                                Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-06 09:27 -0600
                                  Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-11-06 23:09 +0000
                                    Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-06 18:48 -0500
                                      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-06 19:56 -0700
                                  The only phoney in here is you, JED. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-06 16:27 -0700
                                  Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-07 09:26 -0500
                Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 13:30 -0500
                  Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-03 14:54 -0500
                    Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 15:19 -0500
                Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-03 13:09 -0600
                  Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-03 15:10 -0500
                    Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 14:12 -0600
                      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-05 13:29 -0500
                        Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-05 14:01 -0600
                          You are a liar. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-05 13:48 -0700
                          Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-05 15:53 -0500
                            Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-05 15:16 -0600
                              Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-05 16:39 -0500
                                Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-06 16:28 -0700
                              Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-05 21:09 -0500
                              Mortimer Snerd and his usual DUH! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-06 16:29 -0700
              Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-03 16:44 -0500
              Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:18 -0500
                Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 18:39 -0500
                My how Snit babbles on so. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 06:34 -0800
      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-02 20:15 +0100
        Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-02 15:55 -0700
          Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-02 18:18 -0500
            Buh bye Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-03 06:34 -0500
              Re: Buh bye chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-03 07:56 -0600
                Re: Buh bye Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 09:04 -0500
                Re: Buh bye Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:20 -0500
                Now let Chris wipe your pee-pee, Turdv. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 16:05 -0700
              Ah, the infamous "Buh Bye" by chicken-shit Alhstrom. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 16:05 -0700
      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 14:42 -0500
      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 14:15 -0600
        Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 20:50 +0000
      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 22:02 +0000
      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-03 09:43 +0000
        Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:09 -0500
    Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-11-02 11:20 -0800
      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-02 15:57 -0700
    Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 14:10 -0600
    Troll posing as "A Linux Professional" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-02 15:53 -0500
      Re: Troll posing as "A Linux Professional" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-02 15:08 -0600
    Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 13:02 -0800
    Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 22:00 +0000
      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 18:35 -0500
      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Ron House <rhouse@smartchat.net.au> - 2015-11-03 11:32 +1000
        Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 08:08 -0500
          Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Ron House <rhouse@smartchat.net.au> - 2015-11-05 11:58 +1000
            Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-05 06:55 -0600
        Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:37 +0000
          Moi cares ... John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 06:50 -0800
    Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-02 17:49 -0500
    Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-02 15:54 -0700
    Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Ron House <rhouse@smartchat.net.au> - 2015-11-03 11:22 +1000
      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 08:07 -0500
      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-03 13:12 +0000
        Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-03 09:33 -0500
          Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:47 -0500
            Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-03 10:11 -0500
              Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 10:31 -0500
          I want to make it clear to *everybody* that crap like this is completely unacceptable John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 06:54 -0800
            Re: I want to make it clear to *everybody* that crap like this is completely unacceptable Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:58 -0500
      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-03 10:21 -0500
      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Ron House <rhouse@smartchat.net.au> - 2015-11-05 12:07 +1000
        Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-11-05 02:28 -0800
        Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-05 06:44 -0600
    Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-03 09:42 +0000
      Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 08:09 -0500
    Another idiot troll posing as "linux pro". News at 11 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-03 11:05 +0100
      Re: Another idiot troll posing as "linux pro". News at 11 Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-03 11:03 -0500
        Re: Another idiot troll posing as "linux pro". News at 11 Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 11:30 -0500
        Re: Another idiot troll posing as "linux pro". News at 11 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 16:07 -0700

Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7  Next page →

#331166

On 2015-11-05 4:40 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> Bob Loblaw wrote:
> 
>> On 2015-11-05 21:16:00 +0000, JEDIDIAH said:
>>
>>> On 2015-11-05, Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2015-11-05 20:00:48 +0000, JEDIDIAH said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2015-11-05, Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2015-11-04 20:11:21 +0000, JEDIDIAH said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2015-11-03, Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2015-11-03 16:28:29 +0000, Big Fish in a Small Crotch said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 10:55:45 -0500, Bob Loblaw wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2015-11-03 14:17:05 +0000, Charmed Tuna said:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2015-11-03 8:05 AM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [deletia]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sure is.
>>>>>>>>> And if you don't have a copy of MSOffice to test with, you will
>>>>>>>>> never know how well your documents translate when sent to others
>>>>>>>>> who are most likely using MSOffice.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It could range from embarrassing to very expensive should it be a
>>>>>>>>> legal document.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No one uses msoffice for legal documents.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> False.  My lawyers use MS Word.   Companies, governments and other
>>>>>> agencies exchange mountains of MS Word docs which are LOI's,
>>>>>> agreements, contracts, specifications, and so on and which have legal
>>>>>> bearing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not that anything of any substance in a legal document should be
>>>>>>> altered by differing text document formats.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The issue is that as soon as people begin exporting/importing across
>>>>>> systems, it becomes a distraction when minor crap has to be addressed.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no such thing as "minor crap" in a legal document.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <<<<<< Whoosh >>>>>>>>
>>>
>>>     No. You just don't understand the use case despite droning on about
>>>     it.
>>>
>>> [deletia]
>>>
>>>     Pick some other field to focus on because you don't understand this
>>>     one
>>> and you are trying to troll those that actually do.
>>
>> Horseshit.   Collaborative efforts using LO are bounf to fail as the
>> community at large uses, in the main, Word, Excel and Powerpoint.
>>
>> Most people have no clue as to what OpenOffice or LibreOffice are.
> 
> Well, if they are on your "intellectual" level, I can even believe that.
> Heated dirt seems pretty smart compared to you

Says the guy who lies and claims that openSUSE can play MP3s out of the
box (despite what openSUSE's developers say), believes that Windows 9x
didn't run on DOS and that HTML5 is pointless.

*You* are the heated dirt you speak of.


-- 
Slimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331185

"Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message 
news:n1gi7u$g9u$1@dont-email.me...
> Bob Loblaw wrote:
>
>>
>> Most people have no clue as to what OpenOffice or LibreOffice are.
>
> Well, if they are on your "intellectual" level, I can even believe that.
> Heated dirt seems pretty smart compared to you

Things must be very different in Germany and/or Europe. Here in the states 
most people have no clue that Libre Office even exists.

If someone works in IT, development or most technical fields then there's a 
good chance they do know. But that's certainly not anywhere near most 
people.

-- 
"No one uses msoffice for legal documents"

JEDIDIAH - Nov 4, 2015
<slrnn3kpj9.dek.jedi@nomad.mishnet>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331194

On 2015-11-05 7:58 PM, Ezekiel wrote:
> "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message 
> news:n1gi7u$g9u$1@dont-email.me...
>> Bob Loblaw wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Most people have no clue as to what OpenOffice or LibreOffice are.
>>
>> Well, if they are on your "intellectual" level, I can even believe that.
>> Heated dirt seems pretty smart compared to you
> 
> Things must be very different in Germany and/or Europe. Here in the states 
> most people have no clue that Libre Office even exists.
> 
> If someone works in IT, development or most technical fields then there's a 
> good chance they do know. But that's certainly not anywhere near most 
> people.

It's a shame because it's not really that bad. It's not as good as
Microsoft Office by any stretch of the imagination but it would
definitely be more than enough for something like schools and small
businesses to use.


-- 
Slimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331226

Peter Köhlmann wrote:

> troll wrote:
>> 
>> Most people have no clue as to what OpenOffice or LibreOffice are.
>
>Well, if they are on your "intellectual" level, I can even believe that.
>Heated dirt seems pretty smart compared to you

I guess if someone is too dumb to google "free office suite" then
that's there problem.  Of course, there is still the "compatability"
FUD.  

But to blindly hand-over one's money to M$, without even the tiniest
bit of research (which would inevitably lead one to OO/LO?)  That's
just fscking dumb.

-- 
"OpenOffice:
 Pros: It's free so cheapskates that live in mom's basement can use it
too.
 Cons: Everything else."
  -  trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331233

chrisv wrote:

>I guess if someone is too dumb to google "free office suite" then
>that's there problem.  Of course, there is still the "compatability"
>FUD.  

"their problem"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331469

On 2015-11-06 13:05:53 +0000, chrisv said:

> chrisv wrote:
> 
>> I guess if someone is too dumb to google "free office suite" then
>> that's there problem.  Of course, there is still the "compatability"
>> FUD.
> 
> "their problem"

Minor grammatical mistakes don't need correction (by the poster or 
anyone else).

This is usenet, not grade 9 English.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331473

On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 09:17:34 -0500, Bob Loblaw wrote:

> On 2015-11-06 13:05:53 +0000, chrisv said:
> 
>> chrisv wrote:
>> 
>>> I guess if someone is too dumb to google "free office suite" then
>>> that's there problem.  Of course, there is still the "compatability"
>>> FUD.
>> 
>> "their problem"
> 
> Minor grammatical mistakes don't need correction (by the poster or 
> anyone else).
> 
> This is usenet, not grade 9 English.

Have you met 7 yet?
Better put your grammar checker in turbo mode :)

-- 
You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331871

On 2015-11-07 14:28:58 +0000, Big Fish in a Small Crotch said:

> On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 09:17:34 -0500, Bob Loblaw wrote:
> 
>> On 2015-11-06 13:05:53 +0000, chrisv said:
>> 
>>> chrisv wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I guess if someone is too dumb to google "free office suite" then
>>>> that's there problem.  Of course, there is still the "compatability"
>>>> FUD.
>>> 
>>> "their problem"
>> 
>> Minor grammatical mistakes don't need correction (by the poster or
>> anyone else).
>> 
>> This is usenet, not grade 9 English.
> 
> Have you met 7 yet?
> Better put your grammar checker in turbo mode :)


People who point out typos and grammar on usenet need to get out of 
their mother's basement more often.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331872

On 11/9/2015 10:03 AM, Bob Loblaw wrote:
> On 2015-11-07 14:28:58 +0000, Big Fish in a Small Crotch said:
>
>> On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 09:17:34 -0500, Bob Loblaw wrote:
>>
>>> On 2015-11-06 13:05:53 +0000, chrisv said:
>>>
>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I guess if someone is too dumb to google "free office suite" then
>>>>> that's there problem.  Of course, there is still the "compatability"
>>>>> FUD.
>>>>
>>>> "their problem"
>>>
>>> Minor grammatical mistakes don't need correction (by the poster or
>>> anyone else).
>>>
>>> This is usenet, not grade 9 English.
>>
>> Have you met 7 yet?
>> Better put your grammar checker in turbo mode :)
>
>
> People who point out typos and grammar on usenet need to get out of
> their mother's basement more often.

usenet = Usenet

People who netnanny need to get out of Mom's basement for the first time.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331875

On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:03:56 -0500, Bob Loblaw wrote:

> On 2015-11-07 14:28:58 +0000, Big Fish in a Small Crotch said:
> 
>> On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 09:17:34 -0500, Bob Loblaw wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2015-11-06 13:05:53 +0000, chrisv said:
>>> 
>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I guess if someone is too dumb to google "free office suite" then
>>>>> that's there problem.  Of course, there is still the "compatability"
>>>>> FUD.
>>>> 
>>>> "their problem"
>>> 
>>> Minor grammatical mistakes don't need correction (by the poster or
>>> anyone else).
>>> 
>>> This is usenet, not grade 9 English.
>> 
>> Have you met 7 yet?
>> Better put your grammar checker in turbo mode :)
> 
> 
> People who point out typos and grammar on usenet need to get out of
> their mother's basement more often.

You obviously haven't read anything by '7' yet.



-- 
Lloyd

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331476

On 11/7/2015 9:17 AM, Bob Loblaw wrote:
> On 2015-11-06 13:05:53 +0000, shitv said:
>
>> shitv wrote:
>>
>>> I guess if someone is too dumb to google "free office suite" then
>>> that's there problem.  Of course, there is still the "compatability"
>>> FUD.
>>
>> "their problem"
>
> Minor grammatical mistakes don't need correction (by the poster or
> anyone else).
>
> This is usenet, not grade 9 English.


Grammatical mistakes made by self-proclaimed (about a dozen times) 
"intellectually superior" shitheads like shitv do need correction.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331252

On 11/6/2015 7:47 AM, shitv wrote:
> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>
>> troll wrote:
>>>
>>> Most people have no clue as to what OpenOffice or LibreOffice are.
>>
>> Well, if they are on your "intellectual" level, I can even believe that.
>> Heated dirt seems pretty smart compared to you
>
> I guess if someone is too dumb to google "free office suite" then
> that's there problem.

there = their

Another day, another self-nuke by the "intellectually superior" shitv.



> Of course, there is still the "compatability" FUD.

uh huh... it's just "FUD" when LO mangles your Word document.

Why won't your employer move off Office, turd?




> But to blindly hand-over one's money to M$, without even the tiniest
> bit of research (which would inevitably lead one to OO/LO?)  That's
> just fscking dumb.


Once you find out LO is "supported" by a community of hobbyist amateurs, 
no further research is necessary.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331253

On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 09:40:33 -0500, DFS wrote:

> On 11/6/2015 7:47 AM, shitv wrote:
>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>
>>> troll wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Most people have no clue as to what OpenOffice or LibreOffice are.
>>>
>>> Well, if they are on your "intellectual" level, I can even believe that.
>>> Heated dirt seems pretty smart compared to you
>>
>> I guess if someone is too dumb to google "free office suite" then
>> that's there problem.
> 
> there = their
> 
> Another day, another self-nuke by the "intellectually superior" shitv.
> 
> 
> 
>> Of course, there is still the "compatability" FUD.
> 
> uh huh... it's just "FUD" when LO mangles your Word document.
> 
> Why won't your employer move off Office, turd?

chrisv can't even seem to move off Windows. I've asked Gohde to assist
chrisv so he can finally get Linux installed on his PC.

> 
>> But to blindly hand-over one's money to M$, without even the tiniest
>> bit of research (which would inevitably lead one to OO/LO?)  That's
>> just fscking dumb.
> 
> 
> Once you find out LO is "supported" by a community of hobbyist amateurs, 
> no further research is necessary.

Or you get called a troll for asking. Or you get told you are running the
wrong version of Linux or Windows etc.

The Linux community is one of Linux's biggest problems.

-- 
You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331286

On 2015-11-06 9:49 AM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 09:40:33 -0500, DFS wrote:
> 
>> On 11/6/2015 7:47 AM, shitv wrote:
>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>
>>>> troll wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Most people have no clue as to what OpenOffice or LibreOffice are.
>>>>
>>>> Well, if they are on your "intellectual" level, I can even believe that.
>>>> Heated dirt seems pretty smart compared to you
>>>
>>> I guess if someone is too dumb to google "free office suite" then
>>> that's there problem.
>>
>> there = their
>>
>> Another day, another self-nuke by the "intellectually superior" shitv.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Of course, there is still the "compatability" FUD.
>>
>> uh huh... it's just "FUD" when LO mangles your Word document.
>>
>> Why won't your employer move off Office, turd?
> 
> chrisv can't even seem to move off Windows. I've asked Gohde to assist
> chrisv so he can finally get Linux installed on his PC.

cumstainv isn't even worth talking to or about. The guy should be
filtered in the same manner that people filter Snit. The guy adds
absolutely nothing to this newsgroup.

>>> But to blindly hand-over one's money to M$, without even the tiniest
>>> bit of research (which would inevitably lead one to OO/LO?)  That's
>>> just fscking dumb.
>>
>>
>> Once you find out LO is "supported" by a community of hobbyist amateurs, 
>> no further research is necessary.
> 
> Or you get called a troll for asking. Or you get told you are running the
> wrong version of Linux or Windows etc.
> 
> The Linux community is one of Linux's biggest problems.

Especially with morons like Peter the Klöwn, Wideload Porkster and
cumstainv in them.

-- 
Slimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331470

On 2015-11-06 14:40:33 +0000, DFS said:

> On 11/6/2015 7:47 AM, shitv wrote:
>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> 
>>> troll wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Most people have no clue as to what OpenOffice or LibreOffice are.
>>> 
>>> Well, if they are on your "intellectual" level, I can even believe that.
>>> Heated dirt seems pretty smart compared to you
>> 
>> I guess if someone is too dumb to google "free office suite" then
>> that's there problem.
> 
> there = their
> 
> Another day, another self-nuke by the "intellectually superior" shitv.
> 

Only losers point out other's grammatical mistakes on usenet.  It's a 
medium of communication.  Not grade 9 English.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331477

On 11/7/2015 9:18 AM, Bob Loblaw wrote:
> On 2015-11-06 14:40:33 +0000, DFS said:
>
>> On 11/6/2015 7:47 AM, shitv wrote:
>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>
>>>> troll wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Most people have no clue as to what OpenOffice or LibreOffice are.
>>>>
>>>> Well, if they are on your "intellectual" level, I can even believe
>>>> that.
>>>> Heated dirt seems pretty smart compared to you
>>>
>>> I guess if someone is too dumb to google "free office suite" then
>>> that's there problem.
>>
>> there = their
>>
>> Another day, another self-nuke by the "intellectually superior" shitv.
>>
>
> Only losers point out other's grammatical mistakes on usenet.  It's a
> medium of communication.  Not grade 9 English.


Only losers net-nanny on Usenet.

You're a loser.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331876

On 2015-11-07 14:48:18 +0000, DFS said:

> On 11/7/2015 9:18 AM, Bob Loblaw wrote:
>> On 2015-11-06 14:40:33 +0000, DFS said:
>> 
>>> On 11/6/2015 7:47 AM, shitv wrote:
>>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> troll wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Most people have no clue as to what OpenOffice or LibreOffice are.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Well, if they are on your "intellectual" level, I can even believe
>>>>> that.
>>>>> Heated dirt seems pretty smart compared to you
>>>> 
>>>> I guess if someone is too dumb to google "free office suite" then
>>>> that's there problem.
>>> 
>>> there = their
>>> 
>>> Another day, another self-nuke by the "intellectually superior" shitv.
>>> 
>> 
>> Only losers point out other's grammatical mistakes on usenet.  It's a
>> medium of communication.  Not grade 9 English.
> 
> 
> Only losers net-nanny on Usenet.
> 
> You're a loser.

Not at all.  I was being quite gracious to the poster who posted that 
he had made a mistake.  He was being overly self-critical.  No need for 
such.

Then you come in after he posted his correction and post about the 
grammar mistake that he made?  And you accuse me of being a net-nanny?  
Really?

As to your slinging gratuitous insults at people for no reason ... I'd 
put that as a severe case of underconfidence in yourself.  I'm sure you 
can find help for that locally.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331493

On 2015-11-07 9:18 AM, Bob Loblaw wrote:
> On 2015-11-06 14:40:33 +0000, DFS said:
> 
>> On 11/6/2015 7:47 AM, shitv wrote:
>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>
>>>> troll wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Most people have no clue as to what OpenOffice or LibreOffice are.
>>>>
>>>> Well, if they are on your "intellectual" level, I can even believe
>>>> that.
>>>> Heated dirt seems pretty smart compared to you
>>>
>>> I guess if someone is too dumb to google "free office suite" then
>>> that's there problem.
>>
>> there = their
>>
>> Another day, another self-nuke by the "intellectually superior" shitv.
>>
> 
> Only losers point out other's grammatical mistakes on usenet.  It's a
> medium of communication.  Not grade 9 English.

Except that not pointing it out prompts the person in question to
continue making mistakes and eventually risk becoming entirely
incomprehensible.


-- 
Slimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331873

On 2015-11-07 15:21:05 +0000, Slimer said:

> On 2015-11-07 9:18 AM, Bob Loblaw wrote:
>> On 2015-11-06 14:40:33 +0000, DFS said:
>> 
>>> On 11/6/2015 7:47 AM, shitv wrote:
>>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> troll wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Most people have no clue as to what OpenOffice or LibreOffice are.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Well, if they are on your "intellectual" level, I can even believe
>>>>> that.
>>>>> Heated dirt seems pretty smart compared to you
>>>> 
>>>> I guess if someone is too dumb to google "free office suite" then
>>>> that's there problem.
>>> 
>>> there = their
>>> 
>>> Another day, another self-nuke by the "intellectually superior" shitv.
>>> 
>> 
>> Only losers point out other's grammatical mistakes on usenet.  It's a
>> medium of communication.  Not grade 9 English.
> 
> Except that not pointing it out prompts the person in question to
> continue making mistakes and eventually risk becoming entirely
> incomprehensible.

Not at all.  The odd typo or grammar mistake is to be expected.

Given the avalanche of silly and stupid things said with perfect 
spelling, grammar and punctuation, the odd typo or so is really nothing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331270

On 2015-11-05, Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> wrote:
> On 2015-11-05 21:16:00 +0000, JEDIDIAH said:
>
>> On 2015-11-05, Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> wrote:
>>> On 2015-11-05 20:00:48 +0000, JEDIDIAH said:
>>> 
>>>> On 2015-11-05, Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2015-11-04 20:11:21 +0000, JEDIDIAH said:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2015-11-03, Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2015-11-03 16:28:29 +0000, Big Fish in a Small Crotch said:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 10:55:45 -0500, Bob Loblaw wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 2015-11-03 14:17:05 +0000, Charmed Tuna said:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 2015-11-03 8:05 AM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [deletia]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Sure is.
>>>>>>>> And if you don't have a copy of MSOffice to test with, you will never know
>>>>>>>> how well your documents translate when sent to others who are most likely
>>>>>>>> using MSOffice.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It could range from embarrassing to very expensive should it be a legal
>>>>>>>> document.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> No one uses msoffice for legal documents.
>>>>> 
>>>>> False.  My lawyers use MS Word.   Companies, governments and other
>>>>> agencies exchange mountains of MS Word docs which are LOI's,
>>>>> agreements, contracts, specifications, and so on and which have legal
>>>>> bearing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Not that anything of any substance in a legal document should be altered
>>>>>> by differing text document formats.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The issue is that as soon as people begin exporting/importing across
>>>>> systems, it becomes a distraction when minor crap has to be addressed.
>>>> 
>>>> There is no such thing as "minor crap" in a legal document.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> <<<<<< Whoosh >>>>>>>>
>> 
>>     No. You just don't understand the use case despite droning on about it.
>> 
>> [deletia]
>> 
>>     Pick some other field to focus on because you don't understand this one
>> and you are trying to troll those that actually do.
>
> Horseshit.   Collaborative efforts using LO are bounf to fail as the 

    You don't even understand why it is that you are so easy to spot as a phony.

    It was nice playing pretend with you for awhile but you no longer amuse me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web