Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #330418 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-02 13:49 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-11-03 16:07 -0700 |
| Articles | 14 on this page of 134 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-02 13:49 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 13:52 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-02 13:04 -0600
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 19:10 +0000
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-02 14:22 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 19:41 +0000
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 14:52 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-02 18:29 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 18:54 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 19:40 -0600
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-03 08:25 -0600
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-03 08:27 -0600
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-03 10:51 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-03 13:07 -0600
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-03 14:48 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 08:05 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:17 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-03 10:55 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 11:28 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-03 14:53 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 14:11 -0600
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 15:37 -0500
Congrats JEDIDIAH - The most ignorant statement of 2015 "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-04 16:14 -0500
Re: Congrats JEDIDIAH - The most ignorant statement of 2015 Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 16:38 -0500
Re: Congrats JEDIDIAH - The most ignorant statement of 2015 "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-04 16:47 -0500
Re: Congrats JEDIDIAH - The most ignorant statement of 2015 Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 16:49 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 13:21 -0800
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 16:39 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 17:43 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-04 17:54 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 18:44 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 18:46 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-05 13:27 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-05 14:00 -0600
You are nutso. LMFAO!!!! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-05 13:48 -0700
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-05 15:50 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-05 15:16 -0600
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-05 16:37 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-05 22:40 +0100
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-05 17:23 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-05 17:46 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-05 19:58 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-05 21:19 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-06 06:47 -0600
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-06 07:05 -0600
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-07 09:17 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 09:28 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-09 10:03 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-09 10:06 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 15:09 +0000
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-07 09:47 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-06 09:40 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-06 09:49 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-06 11:03 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-07 09:18 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-07 09:48 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-09 10:15 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 10:21 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-09 10:06 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-06 09:27 -0600
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-11-06 23:09 +0000
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-06 18:48 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-06 19:56 -0700
The only phoney in here is you, JED. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-06 16:27 -0700
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-07 09:26 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 13:30 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-03 14:54 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 15:19 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-03 13:09 -0600
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-03 15:10 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 14:12 -0600
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-05 13:29 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-05 14:01 -0600
You are a liar. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-05 13:48 -0700
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-05 15:53 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-05 15:16 -0600
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-05 16:39 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-06 16:28 -0700
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-05 21:09 -0500
Mortimer Snerd and his usual DUH! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-06 16:29 -0700
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-03 16:44 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:18 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 18:39 -0500
My how Snit babbles on so. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 06:34 -0800
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-02 20:15 +0100
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-02 15:55 -0700
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-02 18:18 -0500
Buh bye Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-03 06:34 -0500
Re: Buh bye chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-03 07:56 -0600
Re: Buh bye Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 09:04 -0500
Re: Buh bye Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:20 -0500
Now let Chris wipe your pee-pee, Turdv. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 16:05 -0700
Ah, the infamous "Buh Bye" by chicken-shit Alhstrom. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 16:05 -0700
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 14:42 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 14:15 -0600
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 20:50 +0000
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 22:02 +0000
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-03 09:43 +0000
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:09 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-11-02 11:20 -0800
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-02 15:57 -0700
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 14:10 -0600
Troll posing as "A Linux Professional" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-02 15:53 -0500
Re: Troll posing as "A Linux Professional" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-02 15:08 -0600
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 13:02 -0800
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 22:00 +0000
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 18:35 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Ron House <rhouse@smartchat.net.au> - 2015-11-03 11:32 +1000
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 08:08 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Ron House <rhouse@smartchat.net.au> - 2015-11-05 11:58 +1000
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-05 06:55 -0600
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:37 +0000
Moi cares ... John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 06:50 -0800
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-02 17:49 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-02 15:54 -0700
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Ron House <rhouse@smartchat.net.au> - 2015-11-03 11:22 +1000
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 08:07 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-03 13:12 +0000
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-03 09:33 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:47 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-03 10:11 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 10:31 -0500
I want to make it clear to *everybody* that crap like this is completely unacceptable John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 06:54 -0800
Re: I want to make it clear to *everybody* that crap like this is completely unacceptable Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:58 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-03 10:21 -0500
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Ron House <rhouse@smartchat.net.au> - 2015-11-05 12:07 +1000
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-11-05 02:28 -0800
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-05 06:44 -0600
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-03 09:42 +0000
Re: A Linux Professional to Linux fans and enemies Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 08:09 -0500
Another idiot troll posing as "linux pro". News at 11 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-03 11:05 +0100
Re: Another idiot troll posing as "linux pro". News at 11 Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-03 11:03 -0500
Re: Another idiot troll posing as "linux pro". News at 11 Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 11:30 -0500
Re: Another idiot troll posing as "linux pro". News at 11 GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 16:07 -0700
Page 7 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 10:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1aimh$6eq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #330656 |
"Charmed Tuna" <.m@nsn.s> wrote in message news:n1ah92$vru$1@dont-email.me... > On 2015-11-03 9:33 AM, Ezekiel wrote: >> "Desk Rabbit" <me@example.com> wrote in message >> news:n1abn4$91g$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org... >>> On 03/11/2015 02:08, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>>> On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:22:22 +1000, Ron House wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 03/11/15 04:49, Bob Loblaw wrote: >>>>>> But the one area where it is an abject useless stinkpile of garbage >>>>>> is >>>>> > ... >>>>> >>>>>> Linux fanbois ... >>>>> >>>>> Troll. Plonk. How stupid do you think people are? >>>>> >>>>> (Note to visitors: the above piece of scum is almost certainly a paid >>>>> troller. Do YOU want to buy your OS from a company that treats you >>>>> like >>>>> that?) >>>> >>>> Feel free to provide any sort of proof of your allegation. >>>> >> >> I'm sure that some sort of proof/evidence of this will be coming along >> shortly. >> >> >>> I'm amazed that these clowns seriously believe that commercially >>> successful companies need to pay someone to come into this particular >>> Linux cess pit to deride Linux Desktop when it has such a tiny market >>> penetration! >>> >>> Also, anyone with an IQ in double figures who is reading this thread >>> will >>> quickly see that the only response the so called Linux Advocates can >>> come >>> up with is some playground name calling. >> >> LOL - "almost certainly a paid troller." >> >> Shows what a paranoid idiot this guy is. I'm sure that huge companies >> have >> nothing better to do than to pay someone to post on USENET in some >> obscure >> newsgroup that about 20-30 people read. Never mind things like Facebook, >> Twitter, Instagram, etc. They're paying people to post to USENET !!!!! >> >> An excellent example that shows the lack of intelligence, logic and >> reasoning these morons have. > > But Joseph "7" Michael told me that Appile and Micro$haft do these kinds > of things routinely and "Doctor" Roy Schestowitz told me that both > companies came to him and explicitly asked for his permission! > In the mind of an "advocate", the boogie man is lurking behind every corner. -- "Linux - for IQs greater than 2000" Dumb Willy - Too stupid to know what an IQ is or how it's measured.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 10:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1ajt4$ahb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #330664 |
On 2015-11-03 10:11 AM, Ezekiel wrote: > "Charmed Tuna" <.m@nsn.s> wrote in message > news:n1ah92$vru$1@dont-email.me... >> On 2015-11-03 9:33 AM, Ezekiel wrote: >>> "Desk Rabbit" <me@example.com> wrote in message >>> news:n1abn4$91g$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org... >>>> On 03/11/2015 02:08, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:22:22 +1000, Ron House wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 03/11/15 04:49, Bob Loblaw wrote: >>>>>>> But the one area where it is an abject useless stinkpile of garbage >>>>>>> is >>>>>> > ... >>>>>> >>>>>>> Linux fanbois ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Troll. Plonk. How stupid do you think people are? >>>>>> >>>>>> (Note to visitors: the above piece of scum is almost certainly a paid >>>>>> troller. Do YOU want to buy your OS from a company that treats you >>>>>> like >>>>>> that?) >>>>> >>>>> Feel free to provide any sort of proof of your allegation. >>>>> >>> >>> I'm sure that some sort of proof/evidence of this will be coming along >>> shortly. >>> >>> >>>> I'm amazed that these clowns seriously believe that commercially >>>> successful companies need to pay someone to come into this particular >>>> Linux cess pit to deride Linux Desktop when it has such a tiny market >>>> penetration! >>>> >>>> Also, anyone with an IQ in double figures who is reading this thread >>>> will >>>> quickly see that the only response the so called Linux Advocates can >>>> come >>>> up with is some playground name calling. >>> >>> LOL - "almost certainly a paid troller." >>> >>> Shows what a paranoid idiot this guy is. I'm sure that huge companies >>> have >>> nothing better to do than to pay someone to post on USENET in some >>> obscure >>> newsgroup that about 20-30 people read. Never mind things like Facebook, >>> Twitter, Instagram, etc. They're paying people to post to USENET !!!!! >>> >>> An excellent example that shows the lack of intelligence, logic and >>> reasoning these morons have. >> >> But Joseph "7" Michael told me that Appile and Micro$haft do these kinds >> of things routinely and "Doctor" Roy Schestowitz told me that both >> companies came to him and explicitly asked for his permission! >> > > In the mind of an "advocate", the boogie man is lurking behind every corner. 7 told me that Micro$haft and Appile were responsible for the massive gang rapes in Sweden too. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 06:54 -0800 |
| Subject | I want to make it clear to *everybody* that crap like this is completely unacceptable |
| Message-ID | <418c45ec-b4ca-431e-b54b-d87a0864853e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #330655 |
On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 9:33:14 AM UTC-5, Ezekiel wrote: > "Desk Rabbit" <me@example.com> wrote in message > news:n1abn4$91g$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org... > > On 03/11/2015 02:08, Lloyd Parsons wrote: > >> On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:22:22 +1000, Ron House wrote: > >> > >>> On 03/11/15 04:49, Bob Loblaw wrote: > >>>> But the one area where it is an abject useless stinkpile of garbage is > >>> > ... > >>> > >>>> Linux fanbois ... > >>> > >>> Troll. Plonk. How stupid do you think people are? > >>> > >>> (Note to visitors: the above piece of scum is almost certainly a paid > >>> troller. Do YOU want to buy your OS from a company that treats you like > >>> that?) > >> > >> Feel free to provide any sort of proof of your allegation. > >> > > I'm sure that some sort of proof/evidence of this will be coming along > shortly. > > > > I'm amazed that these clowns seriously believe that commercially > > successful companies need to pay someone to come into this particular > > Linux cess pit to deride Linux Desktop when it has such a tiny market > > penetration! > > > > Also, anyone with an IQ in double figures who is reading this thread will > > quickly see that the only response the so called Linux Advocates can come > > up with is some playground name calling. > > LOL - "almost certainly a paid troller." > > Shows what a paranoid idiot this guy is. I'm sure that huge companies have > nothing better to do than to pay someone to post on USENET in some obscure > newsgroup that about 20-30 people read. Never mind things like Facebook, > Twitter, Instagram, etc. They're paying people to post to USENET !!!!! > > An excellent example that shows the lack of intelligence, logic and > reasoning these morons have. At times like this, one can only quote Linus. "I want to make it clear to *everybody* that [crap] like this is completely unacceptable."--Linus, the great one https://regmedia.co.uk/2015/07/08/linus_torvalds_flips_the_bird.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 09:58 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: I want to make it clear to *everybody* that crap like this is completely unacceptable |
| Message-ID | <n1ahuu$2ve$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #330657 |
On 2015-11-03 9:54 AM, John Gohde wrote: > On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 9:33:14 AM UTC-5, Ezekiel wrote: >> "Desk Rabbit" <me@example.com> wrote in message >> news:n1abn4$91g$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org... >>> On 03/11/2015 02:08, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>>> On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:22:22 +1000, Ron House wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 03/11/15 04:49, Bob Loblaw wrote: >>>>>> But the one area where it is an abject useless stinkpile of garbage is >>>>> > ... >>>>> >>>>>> Linux fanbois ... >>>>> >>>>> Troll. Plonk. How stupid do you think people are? >>>>> >>>>> (Note to visitors: the above piece of scum is almost certainly a paid >>>>> troller. Do YOU want to buy your OS from a company that treats you like >>>>> that?) >>>> >>>> Feel free to provide any sort of proof of your allegation. >>>> >> >> I'm sure that some sort of proof/evidence of this will be coming along >> shortly. >> >> >>> I'm amazed that these clowns seriously believe that commercially >>> successful companies need to pay someone to come into this particular >>> Linux cess pit to deride Linux Desktop when it has such a tiny market >>> penetration! >>> >>> Also, anyone with an IQ in double figures who is reading this thread will >>> quickly see that the only response the so called Linux Advocates can come >>> up with is some playground name calling. >> >> LOL - "almost certainly a paid troller." >> >> Shows what a paranoid idiot this guy is. I'm sure that huge companies have >> nothing better to do than to pay someone to post on USENET in some obscure >> newsgroup that about 20-30 people read. Never mind things like Facebook, >> Twitter, Instagram, etc. They're paying people to post to USENET !!!!! >> >> An excellent example that shows the lack of intelligence, logic and >> reasoning these morons have. > > > > At times like this, one can only quote Linus. > > "I want to make it clear to *everybody* that [crap] like this is completely unacceptable."--Linus, the great one > https://regmedia.co.uk/2015/07/08/linus_torvalds_flips_the_bird.jpg I imagine that your mother has heard that line used repeatedly in reference to you. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 10:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2015110310213489398-BL@LinuxProfessionalscom> |
| In reply to | #330555 |
On 2015-11-03 01:22:22 +0000, Ron House said: > On 03/11/15 04:49, Bob Loblaw wrote: >> But the one area where it is an abject useless stinkpile of garbage is > > ... > >> Linux fanbois ... > > Troll. Plonk. How stupid do you think people are? Not stupid. Just ignorant. > > (Note to visitors: the above piece of scum is almost certainly a paid > troller. Do YOU want to buy your OS from a company that treats you like > that?) Paid to do this? Oh my! That would be nice I admit. No this is part of my volluntary contribution to the community. Pro bono. Just pointing out what the naturally blind see to those who are willfully blind.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ron House <rhouse@smartchat.net.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-05 12:07 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <563AB9F8.4070302@smartchat.net.au> |
| In reply to | #330555 |
On 03/11/15 12:08, Lloyd Parsons wrote: > On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:22:22 +1000, Ron House wrote: > >> On 03/11/15 04:49, Bob Loblaw wrote: >>> But the one area where it is an abject useless stinkpile of garbage is >> > ... >> >>> Linux fanbois ... >> >> Troll. Plonk. How stupid do you think people are? >> >> (Note to visitors: the above piece of scum is almost certainly a paid >> troller. Do YOU want to buy your OS from a company that treats you like >> that?) > > Feel free to provide any sort of proof of your allegation. > > > Oi, moron: "almost certainly" is a probability claim, not an allegation. And I have previously posted my reasons for holding this particular probability assessment. The fact that ONE person can spend more than a waking day posting to this forum, about dozens of linux variants that they claim to have tried personally, finding obscure bugs that no one using the OS in a practical, non-forensic way would ever notice, strongly indicates a huge operation behind each of these trolls. That is why I believe it is almost certain they are paid for by an outfit with deep pockets - and one that has a vested interest in keeping the OS market a near-monopoly. Now who could that be, I wonder? Anyway, I wasn't talking TO you, I was talking ABOUT you to the decent people who might be looking in. So crawl back in your hole, you won't prod me into any more replies to your dishonesty. -- Ron House
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-05 02:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <35ad30db-8343-4848-9f2d-e6f22f79eb08@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #330996 |
Ron House wrote: > Lloyd Parsons wrote: >> On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:22:22 +1000, Ron House wrote: >>> On 03/11/15 04:49, Bob Loblaw wrote: >>>> ... >>>> Linux fanbois ... >>> >>> Troll. Yup. >>> Plonk. How stupid do you think people are? Smarter than you, clearly, because you bit on the bait. >>> (Note to visitors: the above piece of scum is almost certainly a paid >>> troller. Do YOU want to buy your OS from a company that treats you >>> like that?) >> >> Feel free to provide any sort of proof of your allegation. > > Oi, moron: "almost certainly" is a probability claim, not an allegation. Incorrect: it is an allegation, which you rationalized making based on what you *believe* as "probable". Plus you then made a second leap of bias to try to attribute it to your favorite 'nefarious evil corporation', again with zero credible evidence...just the "hunch" of YA Internet troll kook. > And I have previously posted my reasons for holding this particular > probability assessment. Definitive claim: Cite, please. > The fact that ONE person can spend more than a waking day > posting to this forum, about dozens of linux variants that > they claim to have tried personally, finding obscure bugs that no one > using the OS in a practical, non-forensic way would ever notice, > strongly indicates a huge operation behind each of these trolls. It hardly takes a "huge operation" to pay for a Man-Day, or even more. And that's even before considering readily available alternatives which as per Occham's Razor are equally (or more) likely, such as media reports on ghost writers for online product reviews (IIRC, only ~$5 per review), as well as a motivation of simple boredom/entertainment. > That is why I believe it is almost certain they are paid for by an outfit > with deep pockets - and one that has a vested interest in keeping the > OS market a near-monopoly. Now who could that be, I wonder? Also flawed logic, as it could just as easily be a homeless person who spends their days on a PC in a free public library. Or someone with a medical disability who finds this outlet as their social interaction. And given the "audience" of COLA, a corporation would obviously look at the the cost:benefit of the venue, and when planted Amazon reviews are worth only $5 on the fraud/troll market, random COLA quips are a few pennies at most...beneath their significance threshold to bother with. > Anyway, I wasn't talking TO you, ... Also incorrect: it was a public post, which by definition is addressed to all. > I was talking ABOUT you to the decent people who might be looking in. Ohm the irony. > So crawl back in your hole, you won't prod me into any more replies to your dishonesty. You first...whoever you really are. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-05 06:44 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <5kjm3b1kbjnkfc2r2on3q8m6hg9qf9cb0j@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #330996 |
Ron House wrote: >The fact that ONE person can spend more than a >waking day posting to this forum, about dozens of linux variants that >they claim to have tried personally, finding obscure bugs that no one >using the OS in a practical, non-forensic way would ever notice, >strongly indicates a huge operation behind each of these trolls. I doubt it. You see, the trolls don't post about their own experiences. They just google for problems, and then pretend that they are having the problem. -- "There are enough OSS craps to moan about to keep DFS busy for years. Its the nature of the beast." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 09:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n19ve2$n0v$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> |
| In reply to | #330418 |
On 02/11/2015 18:49, Bob Loblaw wrote: > Linux is the best OS or amongst the best OS's for a lot of things. > > Databases, servers, many embedded systems, ... a long list of > applications where Linux does great and is the number one choice for > good reason. It's the OS of almost every TOP500 supercomputer running > today inlcuding all of the top 10. > > But the one area where it is an abject useless stinkpile of garbage is > office or home desktop environments. It's not just the plethora of > competing horribly ugly Linux desktop environments but the utter lack of > support from mainstream software publishers to provide their high > quality wares to a tiny sliver of the market. > > I utterly hate Windows and the company that shall not be named that > publishes that monstrosity and its companion apps. But Windows is > superior to Linux as a desktop environment. Ouch! That pains me. > > Linux is so rotten as a desktop environment that people would rather > face the legal risks of installing bootleg versions of Windows than > legally installing free Linux distros! > > OS X is obviously the superior *nix where desktop is concerned. It > exudes competent design in every detail - and it is so well designed for > ordinary users that the most computer averse grandmother from Numbnuts, > Arkansas can use it, configure it, update it, manage it and even correct > issues that occur. I, a Linux professional programmer, administrator > and entrepreneur use OS X even to develop for Linux. It's that simple > fanbois. Linux desktop is utter tripe in all its myriad forms. > Embarrasing actually. Every time I'm forced by circustance to load a > Linux desktop I find the entire experience cringeworthy. > > Even with with Apple on its knees in the late 90's and early 2000's, the > Linux "movement" could not take on the expensive Windows near monopoly > with a free *nix and desktop environment. Even with Apple's expensive > computers and often expensive companion software Linux desktop could not > take over a market despite being given away for free and usable on the > cheapest, skankiest hardware out there. > > Linux fanbois keep on embarrassing Linux professionals with the cesspool > nonsense notion that Linux is a viable desktop alternative to Windows. > > It hasn't. It isn't. It won't be. Get over it Fanbois and please stop > embarrassing the rest of us. > Well said. Here, have a standing ovation.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 08:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vrl14w8371og.ztkodacst36q$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #330608 |
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 09:42:32 +0000, Desk Rabbit wrote: > On 02/11/2015 18:49, Bob Loblaw wrote: >> Linux is the best OS or amongst the best OS's for a lot of things. >> >> Databases, servers, many embedded systems, ... a long list of >> applications where Linux does great and is the number one choice for >> good reason. It's the OS of almost every TOP500 supercomputer running >> today inlcuding all of the top 10. >> >> But the one area where it is an abject useless stinkpile of garbage is >> office or home desktop environments. It's not just the plethora of >> competing horribly ugly Linux desktop environments but the utter lack of >> support from mainstream software publishers to provide their high >> quality wares to a tiny sliver of the market. >> >> I utterly hate Windows and the company that shall not be named that >> publishes that monstrosity and its companion apps. But Windows is >> superior to Linux as a desktop environment. Ouch! That pains me. >> >> Linux is so rotten as a desktop environment that people would rather >> face the legal risks of installing bootleg versions of Windows than >> legally installing free Linux distros! >> >> OS X is obviously the superior *nix where desktop is concerned. It >> exudes competent design in every detail - and it is so well designed for >> ordinary users that the most computer averse grandmother from Numbnuts, >> Arkansas can use it, configure it, update it, manage it and even correct >> issues that occur. I, a Linux professional programmer, administrator >> and entrepreneur use OS X even to develop for Linux. It's that simple >> fanbois. Linux desktop is utter tripe in all its myriad forms. >> Embarrasing actually. Every time I'm forced by circustance to load a >> Linux desktop I find the entire experience cringeworthy. >> >> Even with with Apple on its knees in the late 90's and early 2000's, the >> Linux "movement" could not take on the expensive Windows near monopoly >> with a free *nix and desktop environment. Even with Apple's expensive >> computers and often expensive companion software Linux desktop could not >> take over a market despite being given away for free and usable on the >> cheapest, skankiest hardware out there. >> >> Linux fanbois keep on embarrassing Linux professionals with the cesspool >> nonsense notion that Linux is a viable desktop alternative to Windows. >> >> It hasn't. It isn't. It won't be. Get over it Fanbois and please stop >> embarrassing the rest of us. >> > > Well said. Here, have a standing ovation. +1000000000 -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 11:05 +0100 |
| Subject | Another idiot troll posing as "linux pro". News at 11 |
| Message-ID | <n1a0oa$qem$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #330418 |
Bob Loblaw wrote: > Linux is the best OS or amongst the best OS's for a lot of things. > > Databases, servers, many embedded systems, ... a long list of > applications where Linux does great and is the number one choice for > good reason. It's the OS of almost every TOP500 supercomputer running > today inlcuding all of the top 10. > > But the one area where it is an abject useless stinkpile of garbage is > office or home desktop environments Yes, a real "Linux profesional" Smells quite fishy. And very flat
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 11:03 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Another idiot troll posing as "linux pro". News at 11 |
| Message-ID | <2015110311033472596-BL@LinuxProfessionalscom> |
| In reply to | #330610 |
On 2015-11-03 11:41:40 +0000, William Poaster said: > It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted: > >> Bob Loblaw wrote: >> >>> Linux is the best OS or amongst the best OS's for a lot of things. >>> >>> Databases, servers, many embedded systems, ... a long list of >>> applications where Linux does great and is the number one choice for >>> good reason. It's the OS of almost every TOP500 supercomputer running >>> today inlcuding all of the top 10. >>> >>> But the one area where it is an abject useless stinkpile of garbage is >>> office or home desktop environments >> >> Yes, a real "Linux profesional" >> >> Smells quite fishy. And very flat > > And to use the troll's own words to describe its peurile post, an abject > useless stinkpile of garbage. Signature blocks like yours indicate you're pwned by your own delusions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 11:30 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Another idiot troll posing as "linux pro". News at 11 |
| Message-ID | <134ndtmutvgjj$.kxh77ijffst2.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #330674 |
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 11:03:34 -0500, Bob Loblaw wrote: > On 2015-11-03 11:41:40 +0000, William Poaster said: > >> It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted: >> >>> Bob Loblaw wrote: >>> >>>> Linux is the best OS or amongst the best OS's for a lot of things. >>>> >>>> Databases, servers, many embedded systems, ... a long list of >>>> applications where Linux does great and is the number one choice for >>>> good reason. It's the OS of almost every TOP500 supercomputer running >>>> today inlcuding all of the top 10. >>>> >>>> But the one area where it is an abject useless stinkpile of garbage is >>>> office or home desktop environments >>> >>> Yes, a real "Linux profesional" >>> >>> Smells quite fishy. And very flat >> >> And to use the troll's own words to describe its peurile post, an abject >> useless stinkpile of garbage. > > Signature blocks like yours indicate you're pwned by your own delusions. William Poaster = Geoff Fitton = janitor. Granted, Geoff has won a major award for his janitorial skills, but he's still a janitor. Albeit the best janitor in U.K. http://www.iheem.org.uk/2013-Award-Winners -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 16:07 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Another idiot troll posing as "linux pro". News at 11 |
| Message-ID | <ObCdnZSVA6ayo6TLnZ2dnUU7-YPus__v@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #330674 |
On 11/03/15 09:03, Bob Loblaw wrote: > On 2015-11-03 11:41:40 +0000, William Poaster said: > >> It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted: >> >>> Bob Loblaw wrote: >>> >>>> Linux is the best OS or amongst the best OS's for a lot of things. >>>> >>>> Databases, servers, many embedded systems, ... a long list of >>>> applications where Linux does great and is the number one choice for >>>> good reason. It's the OS of almost every TOP500 supercomputer running >>>> today inlcuding all of the top 10. >>>> >>>> But the one area where it is an abject useless stinkpile of garbage is >>>> office or home desktop environments >>> >>> Yes, a real "Linux profesional" >>> >>> Smells quite fishy. And very flat >> >> And to use the troll's own words to describe its peurile post, an abject >> useless stinkpile of garbage. > > Signature blocks like yours indicate you're pwned by your own delusions. > LOL!!! His kill file is huge, most of the inhabitants on earth is in there. -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web