Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #687801

Re: Modern cosmology's crises

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Modern cosmology's crises
Date	Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:43:33 -0500
Organization	Modern Human
Message-ID	<vrmpbl$8gd7$3@solani.org> (permalink)
References	<VsOdnVcJzYL7-Eb6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> <67DC54B4.7CAE@ix.netcom.com> <2h6cnTK-Wo2HxEH6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <67DCA1C2.1E88@ix.netcom.com> <APSdnSkTq9AawUD6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <67DDBDC3.1464@ix.netcom.com> <D3WdnahSf9Uoo0P6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Sat, 22 Mar 2025 16:43:33 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	solani.org; logging-data="278951"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent	Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock	sha1:jxlTeaSt76Y97O0PQjitUM4bTdQ=
Content-Language	en-US, fa-IR
X-User-ID	eJwFwYEBwCAIA7CXVoGC50iV/09YEkZQ6Qx6TEzWwU2e3opzRX2oyFfLcwoPBjvlXy8mlHW1iA49bY41+wdMmRVm
In-Reply-To	<D3WdnahSf9Uoo0P6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:662065 sci.physics:891957 comp.os.linux.advocacy:687801

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On 3/21/25 11:38 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 03/21/2025 12:28 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Researchers in foundations and physics know that
>>> the data thusly makes it so that the theories of
>>> mechanics and the optical sort of demand a retro-classical
>>> super-classical account of that the theory is a theory
>>> of fields of potential, and that optical light is special
>>> and is not the same as electromagnetic or nuclear radiation,
>>> and that the mechanical has "worlds turn" or for the
>>> free rotational, with space/frames and frame/spaces, and
>>> while still setting up the Galilean and Newtonian and
>>> Lorentzian in the middle, though not necessarily keeping
>>> the gravitational equivalence principle, with regards to
>>> the orbifold instead of the geodesy, and that there's
>>> that momentum isn't a conserved quantity, and that
>>> it's a continuum mechanics what makes any quantum mechanics,
>>> with wave/resonance dichotomy above particle/wave duality,
>>> so that it results the old linear classical is just a
>>> mere differential time-slice, that is itself always
>>> a sum-of-histories sum-of-potentials least-action least-gradient,
>>> theory.
>>
>>
>>
>> The truth is...particles do not behave like waves.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> And your 'one sentence paragrah' looks like it was writen by a girl with
>> her panties in a knot.
>>
>>
>>
> 
> Yeah, shut the fuck up, you frivolous moron.
> 
> 



I see Kosmanson does not like a much more efficiently active rival :)

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Modern cosmology's crises Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 11:43 -0500
  Re: Modern cosmology's crises x <x@x.org> - 2025-03-22 13:25 -0700
    Re: Modern cosmology's crises % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 13:28 -0700
      Re: Modern cosmology's crises x <x@x.org> - 2025-03-22 15:43 -0700
        Re: Modern cosmology's crises % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 16:12 -0700
          Re: Modern cosmology's crises x <x@x.org> - 2025-03-23 15:55 -0700
  Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-22 22:15 +0000
    Re: Modern cosmology's crises Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-03-23 10:25 -0400

csiph-web