Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #687820

Re: Modern cosmology's crises

From	x <x@x.org>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Modern cosmology's crises
Date	2025-03-22 15:43 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<vrnee3$u8mk$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <67DDBDC3.1464@ix.netcom.com> <D3WdnahSf9Uoo0P6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <vrmpbl$8gd7$3@solani.org> <vrn6cq$n2iq$1@dont-email.me> <oM-dna-fFY4TgEL6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 03/22/2025 01:28 PM, % wrote:
> x wrote:
>> On 03/22/2025 09:43 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>> On 3/21/25 11:38 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>> On 03/21/2025 12:28 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Researchers in foundations and physics know that
>>>>>> the data thusly makes it so that the theories of
>>>>>> mechanics and the optical sort of demand a retro-classical
>>>>>> super-classical account of that the theory is a theory
>>>>>> of fields of potential, and that optical light is special
>>>>>> and is not the same as electromagnetic or nuclear radiation,
>>>>>> and that the mechanical has "worlds turn" or for the
>>>>>> free rotational, with space/frames and frame/spaces, and
>>>>>> while still setting up the Galilean and Newtonian and
>>>>>> Lorentzian in the middle, though not necessarily keeping
>>>>>> the gravitational equivalence principle, with regards to
>>>>>> the orbifold instead of the geodesy, and that there's
>>>>>> that momentum isn't a conserved quantity, and that
>>>>>> it's a continuum mechanics what makes any quantum mechanics,
>>>>>> with wave/resonance dichotomy above particle/wave duality,
>>>>>> so that it results the old linear classical is just a
>>>>>> mere differential time-slice, that is itself always
>>>>>> a sum-of-histories sum-of-potentials least-action least-gradient,
>>>>>> theory.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The truth is...particles do not behave like waves.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And your 'one sentence paragrah' looks like it was writen by a girl 
>>>>> with
>>>>> her panties in a knot.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, shut the fuck up, you frivolous moron.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I see Kosmanson does not like a much more efficiently active rival :)
>>>
>>
>> Yea there is a religion called 'psychology' or the
>> worship of Psyche, the wife of Cupid, that has terms
>> called 'word salad'.
>>
>> There are words like 'point' and 'curve' in analytical
>> geometry, but are they supposed to be the same as
>> 'particle' or 'wave'?  Yes?  No?  Maybe?  People
>> are jumping up and down in physics and shouting 'no
>> one can understand me because I AM WORD SALAD.
>> I am not just esoteric, people should actually
>> pay me more money!!!  The second that someone
>> asks someone else - what is a particle and
>> what is a wave?  How is it similar to point
>> or curve in mathematics and how is it different?
>> Then people shout 'baby' 'baby' 'stupid' 'stupid'.
>>
>> Psychology also has come up with a term called
>> the 'Dunning Kruger effect'.  This is because
>> most people are fed lies on something called
>> 'television and radio' that constantly feed
>> them the illusion of knowledge while constantly
>> feeding them lies with only the illusion of
>> knowledge at the same time.  People are generally
>> incapable of telling the difference and this
>> constantly has destructive effects all over
>> the place.
>>
> 
> nice user name where did you steal that idea

The letter 'x' was added to the Latin 'alphabet'
when some Italians claimed that they 'owned'
Greece.  They were not capable of picking up
and carrying all of the rocks and dirt in
Greece at the time and carrying it over to
directly adjacent to the Italian peninsula.

Using a symbol in the Latin alphabet is
generally part of that symbol system.
I give you the right to use the letter 'Z'
for the 'G' sound if you want to.

Thread

Re: Modern cosmology's crises Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 11:43 -0500
  Re: Modern cosmology's crises x <x@x.org> - 2025-03-22 13:25 -0700
    Re: Modern cosmology's crises % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 13:28 -0700
      Re: Modern cosmology's crises x <x@x.org> - 2025-03-22 15:43 -0700
        Re: Modern cosmology's crises % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 16:12 -0700
          Re: Modern cosmology's crises x <x@x.org> - 2025-03-23 15:55 -0700
  Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-22 22:15 +0000
    Re: Modern cosmology's crises Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-03-23 10:25 -0400

csiph-web