Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #688961

MIT study finds that AI doesn't, in fact, have values

From "Leroy N. Soetoro" <democrat-insurrection@mail.house.gov>
Newsgroups comp.ai.philosophy, comp.os.linux.advocacy, talk.politics.guns, sac.politics, alt.society.liberalism, or.politics
Subject MIT study finds that AI doesn't, in fact, have values
Date 2025-04-13 21:19 +0000
Organization The next war will be fought against Socialists, in America and the EU.
Message-ID <lnsB2C091C146DA16F089P2473@0.0.0.2> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/09/mit-study-finds-that-ai-doesnt-in-fact-
have-values/

A study went viral several months ago for implying that, as AI becomes 
increasingly sophisticated, it develops “value systems” — systems that 
lead it to, for example, prioritize its own well-being over humans. A more 
recent paper out of MIT pours cold water on that hyperbolic notion, 
drawing the conclusion that AI doesn’t, in fact, hold any coherent values 
to speak of.

The co-authors of the MIT study say their work suggests that “aligning” AI 
systems — that is, ensuring models behave in desirable, dependable ways — 
could be more challenging than is often assumed. AI as we know it today 
hallucinates and imitates, the co-authors stress, making it in many 
aspects unpredictable.

“One thing that we can be certain about is that models don’t obey [lots 
of] stability, extrapolability, and steerability assumptions,” Stephen 
Casper, a doctoral student at MIT and a co-author of the study, told 
TechCrunch. “It’s perfectly legitimate to point out that a model under 
certain conditions expresses preferences consistent with a certain set of 
principles. The problems mostly arise when we try to make claims about the 
models, opinions, or preferences in general based on narrow experiments.”

Casper and his fellow co-authors probed several recent models from Meta, 
Google, Mistral, OpenAI, and Anthropic to see to what degree the models 
exhibited strong “views” and values (e.g., individualist versus 
collectivist). They also investigated whether these views could be 
“steered” — that is, modified — and how stubbornly the models stuck to 
these opinions across a range of scenarios.

According to the co-authors, none of the models was consistent in its 
preferences. Depending on how prompts were worded and framed, they adopted 
wildly different viewpoints.

Casper thinks this is compelling evidence that models are highly 
“inconsistent and unstable” and perhaps even fundamentally incapable of 
internalizing human-like preferences.

“For me, my biggest takeaway from doing all this research is to now have 
an understanding of models as not really being systems that have some sort 
of stable, coherent set of beliefs and preferences,” Casper said. 
“Instead, they are imitators deep down who do all sorts of confabulation 
and say all sorts of frivolous things.”

Mike Cook, a research fellow at King’s College London specializing in AI 
who wasn’t involved with the study, agreed with the co-authors’ findings. 
He noted that there’s frequently a big difference between the “scientific 
reality” of the systems AI labs build and the meanings that people ascribe 
to them.

“A model cannot ‘oppose’ a change in its values, for example — that is us 
projecting onto a system,” Cook said. “Anyone anthropomorphizing AI 
systems to this degree is either playing for attention or seriously 
misunderstanding their relationship with AI … Is an AI system optimizing 
for its goals, or is it ‘acquiring its own values’? It’s a matter of how 
you describe it, and how flowery the language you want to use regarding it 
is.”


-- 
November 5, 2024 - Congratulations President Donald Trump.  We look 
forward to America being great again.

The disease known as Kamala Harris has been effectively treated and 
eradicated.

We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so that 
stupid people won't be offended.

Durham Report: The FBI has an integrity problem.  It has none.

Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden 
fiasco, President Trump.  

Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the 
The World According To Garp.  Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood 
queer liberal democrat donors.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

MIT study finds that AI doesn't, in fact, have values "Leroy N. Soetoro" <democrat-insurrection@mail.house.gov> - 2025-04-13 21:19 +0000
  Re: MIT study finds that AI doesn't, in fact, have values --- PLO olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-04-20 15:14 -0500

csiph-web