Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #477052

Re: Why Linux haters fail

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Why Linux haters fail
Date 2018-11-12 20:01 -0700
Message-ID <g4ut3jFa09aU5@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <nhuiudtc554gq3mp275u6pnic0iqerc7rm@4ax.com> <f6e69315-7ca4-4b14-9e03-017313522d16@googlegroups.com> <u76judp1gbalmi95hblbp82nl233r52scf@4ax.com> <7a9f34ab-866b-4b04-919c-140196a47e76@googlegroups.com> <2icjuddln1rn3rn3o6iubl11ii2q9c4f4g@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 11/12/18 10:37 AM, chrisv wrote:
> lying asshole "-hh" wrote:
> 
>> chrisv wrote:
>>> -hh wrote:
>>>> Not to be *too* smug...but it is ironic then that said “idiot” keeps on beating chrisv
>>>> such as by pointing out his logical fallacies.  (snipped, unread)
>>>
>>> Hahaha!!!  Look whose talking!  Didn't we recently see you "logically"
>>> make about a half-dozen incorrect conclusions, based-upon a photo of
>>> my shoes?
>>
>> No, just one.  (snipped, unread)
> 
> If you're going to lead-off your post with a lie, I'm going to stop
> reading it, -highhorse.
> 
> Just as in your previous post, claiming that you've pointed-out
> "logical fallaices" from me, which, of course, has never happened.
> 
> Back on planet Earth, I have documented your logical fallicies
> countless times.
> 
> Is critisizing some aspects of a product's design the same as saying
> that it will not succeed in the market, -highhorse?  You felt
> strongly-enough that the one leads to another, that you accused an
> honest man of lying.  That makes you an asshole, as well as an idiot.
> 
> You well-documented Photoshop lies also come quickly to mind.  From
> our entirely reasonable, value-based opinions, you concluded that we
> "globally reject it for all possible consumers", and that we have an
> "irrational hate" of it, which demonstrates an "unfortunate
> close-mindedness".
> 
> One of your biggest laughers was when you argued that Linux users are
> more likely to pirate Windows software than Windows users are.  The
> sole piece of evidence behind this piece of  "logic" was that Windows
> has "more & better software tools".  Err...  People who need those
> tools generally just run Windows.
> 
> How about your claim that Linux distros decling to spend the money so
> that they may legally call their distro a "unix" "logically" results
> in a lack of "customer-centric expectations of quality assurance".
> 
> How about your claim that using both Windows and Linux is a dilemma,
> akin to wanting to wanting to "have your cake and eat it too"?  Funny,
> I see no similarities in the two situations.
> 
> And on what basis did you conclude that "a healthy segment of the
> advocates" use Linux "merely that it is cheap (free)"?  Because it's
> not at all true, you know.  You just *constantly* at getting it wrong,
> -highhorse.
> 
> I could go on and on...
> 

Quotes! Context!

If you can back your claims this might be fun.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why Linux haters fail chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-09 08:37 -0600
  Re: Why Linux haters fail Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 07:03 -0800
  Re: Why Linux haters fail nobody <nobodysaysitalldoesntit@nobo.org> - 2018-11-09 11:04 -0500
    Re: Why Linux haters fail Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 08:20 -0800
    Re: Why Linux haters fail chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-09 10:41 -0600
      Re: Why Linux haters fail -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-09 09:57 -0800
        Re: Why Linux haters fail Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 10:24 -0800
        Re: Why Linux haters fail chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-09 14:48 -0600
          Re: Why Linux haters fail Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-09 15:18 -0700
          Re: Why Linux haters fail RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 23:14 +0000
            Re: Why Linux haters fail Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 15:37 -0800
              Re: Why Linux haters fail Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 18:58 -0800
            Re: Why Linux haters fail Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-09 16:50 -0700
            Re: Why Linux haters fail -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-09 18:29 -0800
              Re: Why Linux haters fail Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 20:17 -0800
            Re: Why Linux haters fail chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-12 07:09 -0600
              Re: Why Linux haters fail Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 05:27 -0800
              Re: Why Linux haters fail -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-12 06:28 -0800
                Re: Why Linux haters fail Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 06:59 -0800
                Re: Why Linux haters fail chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-12 09:21 -0600
                Re: Why Linux haters fail Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 07:34 -0800
                Re: Why Linux haters fail Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-12 20:02 -0700
                Re: Why Linux haters fail -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-12 08:51 -0800
                Re: Why Linux haters fail chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-12 11:37 -0600
                Re: Why Linux haters fail chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-12 12:07 -0600
                Re: Why Linux haters fail RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 18:40 +0000
                Re: Why Linux haters fail Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 12:42 -0800
                Re: Why Linux haters fail -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-12 13:06 -0800
                Re: Why Linux haters fail Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 20:16 -0800
                Re: Why Linux haters fail Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 05:57 -0800
                Re: Why Linux haters fail Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-12 20:01 -0700
                Re: Why Linux haters fail Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 04:06 -0800
          Re: Why Linux haters fail -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-09 18:25 -0800
            Re: Why Linux haters fail Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 18:43 -0800
      Re: Why Linux haters fail Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-09 11:46 -0700
    Re: Why Linux haters fail Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-09 11:58 -0700
  Too many of the Linux Supporters in COLA are total fruits Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 08:23 -0800
    Re: Too many of the Linux Supporters in COLA are total fruits Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 09:21 -0800
  Too many of the Linux Supporters in COLA are total Linux fruits for anyone here to care Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 05:14 -0800

csiph-web