Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #328192

Re: OT: OK, what changed?

Path csiph.com!xmission!news.alt.net!not-for-mail
From owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: OT: OK, what changed?
Date Sat, 24 Oct 2015 23:41:01 +0000 (UTC)
Organization O.W.L.
Lines 89
Message-ID <fsadk9.aef@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References <c271285b-f733-4db7-8303-61849e46a4be@googlegroups.com> <sdfmnbjc83.03pp@rooftop.invalid> <D24FF750.61367%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <fscmvk93.izd@rooftop.invalid> <D250040A.613A4%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <ads.kb923@rooftop.invalid> <D2504E89.61425%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <fsa.kf93a@rooftop.invalid> <D2512776.61525%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <fsmgldo0.kig8@rooftop.invalid> <D25161FE.6156C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host boom.rooftop.invalid
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
User-Agent tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64 (x86_64))
Xref csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:328192

Show key headers only | View raw

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 10/24/15, 4:03 PM, in article fsmgldo0.kig8@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/24/15, 11:06 AM, in article fsa.kf93a@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 10/23/15, 3:43 PM, in article ads.kb923@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> ... 
>>>>>>>>> After a month rest are you better able to understand?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>   Peter Köhlmann:
>>>>>>>>>     -----
>>>>>>>>>     | For example, if I modified a BSD variant and tried to pass it
>>>>>>>>>     | off as "Linux" to people I would be stopped. I know of no
>>>>>>>>>     | example of this but I think it is pretty obvious the license
>>>>>>>>>     | holders would not allow this.
>>>>>>>>>     BSD allows such sheenigans
>>>>>>>>>     -----
>>>>>>>>> The BSD license has no power to override trademarks and "allow" this.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Message-ID: l98q2g$nj1$1@dont-email.me
>>>>>>>>> <http://goo.gl/zvo4fv>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>> ...
>>>>> The question is if you have figured out how to actually read such a quote
>>>>> yet?
>>>> 
>>>> The fact that someone would have to "figure out how to actually read such
>>>> a quote" shows its "intentionally deceptive and annoying" properties to be
>>>> self-evident.
>>> 
>>> LOL! No reasonable person would have to. I mean, really, your "logic" there
>>> is like my saying I cannot figure out what your above sentence means so thus
>>> YOU must be in the wrong.
>>> 
>>> Completely idiotic of you.
>>> ...
>> 
>> Why did you ask if I had "figured out how to actually read such a
>> quote yet" if you did not yourself recognize just how non-standard your
>> quotation style was?  But of course you recognized that: The obfuscation
>> and lack attribution were by design, and hence "intentionally deceptive
>> and annoying."
>> 
> 
> 1) I posted a quote.

One might ask why you posted that irrelevant quote, but that would surely
lead to another of your lie-filled circuses, so I'll let it go.

> 2) You admitted you were so illiterate you thought it was
>    "intentionally deceptive and annoying."

Where do I "admit that I am illiterate"?  Oh you are just lying again.
Typical Snit. 

> 3) You stopped responding to me for a month.

You were plonked for a month for your behavior in a completely separate
thread that had nothing to do with that quote.

> 4) When you started I asked if during that time you had figured out
>    how to read a simple quote without such illiteracy.

You asked this irrelevant question in reply to a post noting that
you had been plonked for a month because of your behavior in a thread
that had nothing to do with that quote that you are obsessed with.

> 5) You claim this proves your illiterate claim was right.
> 

I think the word "illiterate" could be applied to the above sentence, so  
I won't bother trying to decypher your lie, but whatever it is you are
trying to say in #5 there, I'll just go ahead and ask for proof  --
not expecting ever to see it, of course.

> That answers the question: you are functionally illiterate still.
> 
> Thank you!
> 

So you are still lost.  OK.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 12:10 -0700
  Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 21:14 +0000
    Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 14:35 -0700
      Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 21:58 +0000
        Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:16 -0700
          Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 22:46 +0000
            Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:53 -0700
              Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 22:57 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 16:11 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 23:46 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 21:10 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 21:14 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 21:58 -0700
            Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 20:57 -0700
              Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 21:55 -0700
    Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 14:40 -0700
      Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 21:53 +0000
        Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 15:34 -0700
          Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 22:43 +0000
            Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 20:52 -0700
              Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-24 18:06 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 12:17 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-24 23:03 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 16:27 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-24 23:41 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 16:57 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 00:11 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 17:17 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 00:25 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 17:47 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 12:54 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 10:36 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 18:23 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 14:32 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 18:46 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 16:45 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:08 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 11:45 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 14:54 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:18 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 15:23 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:34 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 15:37 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:58 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:01 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 20:11 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:11 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 20:27 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:27 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 20:38 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:47 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:02 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:08 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:31 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:33 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:51 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 18:07 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 22:28 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:17 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:32 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:20 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 17:28 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:37 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:21 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:15 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:14 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:23 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:13 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 17:25 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:30 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 20:06 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:12 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:22 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:11 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:13 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 08:44 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 00:39 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:42 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-25 20:58 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:53 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:46 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:56 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 23:57 -0400
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 04:46 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 22:22 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 05:43 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:05 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 21:11 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 04:48 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 22:27 -0700
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 05:51 +0000
                Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:05 -0700
          Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:47 -0700
      Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:10 -0700
        Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 22:46 -0400
          Re: OT: OK, what changed? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-10-29 00:31 +0000
            Re: OT: OK, what changed? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-29 07:10 -0500
              Re: OT: OK, what changed? Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 08:36 -0400
              Re: OT: OK, what changed? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-29 14:46 +0100
          Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-29 09:41 -0400
            Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 07:55 -0700

csiph-web