Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #328369
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: OT: OK, what changed? |
| Date | 2015-10-25 22:28 +0000 |
| Organization | O.W.L. |
| Message-ID | <fasdke8.30@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <10eyw2wsff925$.57up5qutvecn$.dlg@40tude.net> <ase93.fjaig02@rooftop.invalid> <1lb36gcnuged3$.cxx83bkqr28h$.dlg@40tude.net> <fszdklw9.r3@rooftop.invalid> <1wf5riiypvqk0.o1uicoitw8s4.dlg@40tude.net> |
Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:51:40 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:31:00 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>> >>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:02:01 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 20:38:42 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 20:27:25 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 20:11:41 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:58:19 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:34:10 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:18:46 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 18:23:53 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2015 8:25 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will let you. When are you going to start trying? Below you just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrate, again, that you are functionally illiterate. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you have no argument. None. Just repetition of nonsense. Got it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's all it takes to totally control you, Carroll, cc, Kohlmann and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And like the proverbial self-righteous ex-smoker, DFS tosses a PKB without >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full disclosure. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For me, Snit is just a convenient practice dummy that I pull from the drawer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on occasion to keep my claws sharp. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You need a better scratching post because Snit owns you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He needs all the help he can get, so it's good to see that you're doing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your part. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Boring. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you had the proper attitude, you wouldn't find school so boring. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> topic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I had written this: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [owl]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [Snit]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Key word AVERAGE. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, Snit's key words were "1 round every 0.583 seconds." FAIL! LOL! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What words were those? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Are you bad at math too? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Define bad. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For starters, if you agree with Snit that 154 rounds in 264 seconds equals >>>>>>>> an average of 1 round every 0.583 seconds, then you are bad at math. Do >>>>>>>> you agree with Snit's math? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Where did I make that claim? >>>>>>> >>>>>> I'm just asking if you agree with Snit's math or not, and for some reason >>>>>> you don't want to answer that question. >>>>> >>>>> I do not agree with snit's math as it stands. >>>> >>>> Then why did you claim that the key word was "AVERAGE" and ignore the >>>> glaring basic math error? >>> >>> Because the key word *is* average. >>> Do you disagree? >>> >> >> No. What's key is Snit's math error. > > But the key WORD is average. > Not if the division that supposedly reveals the average is wrong. Then the keyword becomes "error." > >>> >>>>> As usually the case, snit is wrong. >>>> >>>> I have to agree with you there. >>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> However in recent threads, snit has your ball sack in a twisted mess. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Surely you can quote an example of him twisting my ball sack in a recent >>>> thread. Maybe his insinuation that it would take "much developer time" to >>>> change a malloc() limit? Or his defense of his intentionally deceptive >>>> quoting style that includes no attribution for the majority of the quote? >>> >>> Your crying like a pussy over the quoting style in the latest mega thread >>> is a perfect example. >>> Snit owns you. >>> >> >> Snit dragged that quote-style bullshit back into a completely unrelated >> thread. Who knows why? Was butthurt to blame? You'll have to ask him. > > Says you. Says history. Snit dragged it into the thread in response to mention of his having been plonked for thirty days, trying to imply that discussion of this quote nonsense had been the reason for the plonk, when it truth the plonk had resulted from his behavior in a completely unrelated thread. That he suffered with butthurt those thirty days stewing over criticism of his intentionally deceptive, non-standard quoting style -- and jumped at the first opportunity to resuscitate it -- says more about him than it does about me.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 12:10 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 21:14 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 14:35 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 21:58 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:16 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 22:46 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:53 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 22:57 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 16:11 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 23:46 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 21:10 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 21:14 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 21:58 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 20:57 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 21:55 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 14:40 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 21:53 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 15:34 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 22:43 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 20:52 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-24 18:06 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 12:17 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-24 23:03 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 16:27 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-24 23:41 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 16:57 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 00:11 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 17:17 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 00:25 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 17:47 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 12:54 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 10:36 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 18:23 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 14:32 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 18:46 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 16:45 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:08 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 11:45 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 14:54 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:18 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 15:23 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:34 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 15:37 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:58 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:01 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 20:11 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:11 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 20:27 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:27 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 20:38 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:47 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:02 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:08 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:31 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:33 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:51 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 18:07 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 22:28 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:17 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:32 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:20 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 17:28 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:37 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:21 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:15 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:14 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:23 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:13 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 17:25 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:30 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 20:06 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:12 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:22 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:11 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:13 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 08:44 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 00:39 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:42 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-25 20:58 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:53 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:46 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:56 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 23:57 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 04:46 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 22:22 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 05:43 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:05 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 21:11 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 04:48 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 22:27 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 05:51 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:05 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:47 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:10 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 22:46 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-10-29 00:31 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-29 07:10 -0500
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 08:36 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-29 14:46 +0100
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-29 09:41 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 07:55 -0700
csiph-web