Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #375750
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Scary if not fake |
| Date | 2016-10-09 23:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e603c8F3bd0U3@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <ntc3t0$k64$5@dont-email.me> <e5tk9lFfoakU7@mid.individual.net> <ntcm7a$mst$1@dont-email.me> <e5v46qFqjjsU1@mid.individual.net> <ntdsl9$fs8$2@dont-email.me> |
On 2016-10-09, Silver Slimer <> wrote: > > On 2016-10-09 10:57 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >> On 2016-10-09, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> Jim Polaski wrote: >>> >>>> On 2016-10-09, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>>> ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 08 Oct 2016 15:32:08 +0000, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I suspect the Prescott Parasite and his endless army of >>>>>>> socks has something to do with their paranoia. Some of >>>>>>> them do seem a bit high strung at times. >>>>>> >>>>>> "Paranoia?" Do you even know what the word means? Not >>>>>> wanting to read a moron's idiot rants is not "paranoia" -- >>>>>> it's good sense. It's a healthy dose of prioritizing. Why >>>>>> do I want to waste my time reading stupid crap? -- or >>>>>> people who defend writers of stupid crap... >>>>> >>>>> Or gratitous quoters of stupid crap. >>>> >>>> You must have really pissed off some people for them to write >>>> about you like that. So what did you do or say to piss them >>>> off? >>> >>> Just telling those cretins what kind of bullshit they post is >>> usually enough >> >> Could be. I'm staying out of it. Looks like a few of the crybabies >> KF me anyway. Let's see how long it takes for them to start talking >> about me and replying to my messages via proxy. Too bad for them >> that I'm an independent thinker, form my own opinions based upon >> observation rather than having a mob mentality and following along >> an incorrect premise based upon false accusations. Most of them had >> very little positive to say anyway. > > sMelzzz is already treating you like a troll for expressing an > unpopular opinion. Apparently, the "advocate" version of freedom does > not include freedom of opinion, freedom of speech or freedom of choice > unless that choice is between distributions. > > > - -- > Silver Slimer > Islam is a disease > Gab.AI: @silverslimer I'm laughing my ass off watching them pile on claiming some sort of victory like a kids game. I see the replies via proxy have started already. That was certainly an easy prediction to make. It's something weak people do because they haven't the skill nor the inner fortitude to confront their opponent directly. And I'm not even their opponent although they, as a group, have conjured up false stories to convince themselves that I am. As the saying goes they are short on facts and large on bullshit. They would have been great back in Salem Massachusetts circa 1692 or so.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Scary if not fake Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-07 17:48 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-07 22:04 +0000
Re: Scary if not fake Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-07 18:29 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-07 20:16 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 00:54 +0000
Re: Scary if not fake Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 05:38 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-10-07 21:16 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 18:30 -0700
Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 02:11 +0000
Re: Scary if not fake Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 05:39 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 10:21 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 15:32 +0000
Re: Scary if not fake Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 08:47 -0700
Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 15:55 +0000
Re: Scary if not fake ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 23:28 +0000
Re: Scary if not fake Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 20:44 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 01:19 +0000
Re: Scary if not fake ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 02:09 +0000
Re: Scary if not fake Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-09 08:17 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-09 07:57 +0200
Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 14:57 +0000
Re: Scary if not fake Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-09 17:06 +0200
Re: Scary if not fake Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-09 17:10 +0200
Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 15:32 +0000
Re: Scary if not fake Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-09 19:05 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-10 01:17 +0200
Re: Scary if not fake Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-09 21:55 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-10 05:13 +0200
Re: Scary if not fake Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-09 23:35 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-10 09:21 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 15:31 +0000
Re: Scary if not fake Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-09 12:53 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 23:49 +0000
Re: Scary if not fake Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-09 10:00 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-09 16:15 +0200
Re: Scary if not fake Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-09 19:04 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-10 07:48 -0500
Re: Scary if not fake chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-10 07:59 -0500
Re: Scary if not fake Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 10:09 -0700
Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 15:11 +0000
Re: Scary if not fake Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-09 12:54 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 23:53 +0000
Re: Scary if not fake William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-09 13:25 +0100
Re: Scary if not fake Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-09 08:25 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 01:18 +0000
Re: Scary if not fake ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 02:11 +0000
Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 02:18 +0000
Re: Scary if not fake ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 02:19 +0000
Re: Scary if not fake Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-09 08:17 -0400
Re: Scary if not fake William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-09 13:25 +0100
Re: Scary if not fake William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-09 13:25 +0100
csiph-web