Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #375726

Re: Scary if not fake

From Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Scary if not fake
Date 2016-10-09 15:31 +0000
Message-ID <e5v668Fr47bU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <ntc3t0$k64$5@dont-email.me> <e5tk9lFfoakU7@mid.individual.net> <ntcm7a$mst$1@dont-email.me> <e5v46qFqjjsU1@mid.individual.net> <ntdmd7$pb4$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2016-10-09, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
> Jim Polaski wrote:
>
>> On 2016-10-09, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>> Jim Polaski wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2016-10-09, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>>>> ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 08 Oct 2016 15:32:08 +0000, Jim Polaski wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I suspect the Prescott Parasite and his endless army of socks has
>>>>>>> something to do with their paranoia. Some of them do seem a bit high
>>>>>>> strung at times.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Paranoia?" Do you even know what the word means? Not wanting to read
>>>>>> a moron's idiot rants is not "paranoia" -- it's good sense. It's a
>>>>>> healthy dose of prioritizing. Why do I want to waste my time reading
>>>>>> stupid crap? -- or people who defend writers of stupid crap...
>>>>>
>>>>> Or gratitous quoters of stupid crap.
>>>> 
>>>> You must have really pissed off some people for them to write about you
>>>> like that. So what did you do or say to piss them off?
>>>
>>> Just telling those cretins what kind of bullshit they post is usually
>>> enough
>> 
>> Could be.
>> I'm staying out of it. Looks like a few of the crybabies KF me anyway.
>> Let's see how long it takes for them to
>> start talking about me and replying to my messages via proxy.
>
> With that attitude I would say that you are indeed a troll

Well that's the game they play.
They get to attack and say anything they want about me and as soon as a 
respond by defending myself they point to the post and claim "see we 
told you so" even though the truth is I haven't attacked anyone.

It's a childish game


>> Too bad for them that I'm an independent thinker, form my own opinions
>> based upon observation rather than having a mob mentality and following
>> along an incorrect premise based upon false accusations.
>
> There were very few false accusations by linux advocates

I can only speak for myself and I have done nothing wrong nor have I 
attacked anyone.
I was attacked and I'm going to defend myself.

>> Most of them had very little positive to say anyway.
>
> Depends on your own standpoint

Correct.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Scary if not fake Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-07 17:48 -0400
  Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-07 22:04 +0000
    Re: Scary if not fake Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-07 18:29 -0400
    Re: Scary if not fake Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-07 20:16 -0400
      Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 00:54 +0000
        Re: Scary if not fake Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 05:38 -0400
      Re: Scary if not fake Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-10-07 21:16 -0400
        Re: Scary if not fake Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 18:30 -0700
        Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 02:11 +0000
          Re: Scary if not fake Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 05:39 -0400
          Re: Scary if not fake Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 10:21 -0400
            Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 15:32 +0000
              Re: Scary if not fake Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 08:47 -0700
                Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 15:55 +0000
              Re: Scary if not fake ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 23:28 +0000
                Re: Scary if not fake Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 20:44 -0400
                Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 01:19 +0000
                Re: Scary if not fake ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 02:09 +0000
                Re: Scary if not fake Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-09 08:17 -0400
                Re: Scary if not fake Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-09 07:57 +0200
                Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 14:57 +0000
                Re: Scary if not fake Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-09 17:06 +0200
                Re: Scary if not fake Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-09 17:10 +0200
                Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 15:32 +0000
                Re: Scary if not fake Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-09 19:05 -0400
                Re: Scary if not fake Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-10 01:17 +0200
                Re: Scary if not fake Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-09 21:55 -0400
                Re: Scary if not fake Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-10 05:13 +0200
                Re: Scary if not fake Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-09 23:35 -0400
                Re: Scary if not fake Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-10 09:21 -0400
                Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 15:31 +0000
                Re: Scary if not fake Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-09 12:53 -0400
                Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 23:49 +0000
                Re: Scary if not fake Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-09 10:00 -0400
                Re: Scary if not fake Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-09 16:15 +0200
                Re: Scary if not fake Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-09 19:04 -0400
                Re: Scary if not fake chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-10 07:48 -0500
                Re: Scary if not fake chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-10 07:59 -0500
                Re: Scary if not fake Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 10:09 -0700
                Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 15:11 +0000
                Re: Scary if not fake Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-09 12:54 -0400
                Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 23:53 +0000
                Re: Scary if not fake William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-09 13:25 +0100
                Re: Scary if not fake Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-09 08:25 -0400
                Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 01:18 +0000
                Re: Scary if not fake ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 02:11 +0000
                Re: Scary if not fake Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 02:18 +0000
                Re: Scary if not fake ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 02:19 +0000
                Re: Scary if not fake Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-09 08:17 -0400
                Re: Scary if not fake William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-09 13:25 +0100
                Re: Scary if not fake William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-09 13:25 +0100

csiph-web