Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #242004
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: $1m propietary costs suck, Open source costs less |
| Date | 2014-05-05 17:41 +0200 |
| Organization | gnu |
| Message-ID | <878uqguta3.fsf@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <vAv9v.258322$_t1.89633@fx31.am4> <lk89bd$6ht$1@dont-email.me> |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: > On 5/4/2014 2:23 PM, 7 wrote: >> $1m propietary costs suck, Open source costs less >> ------------------------------------------------- >> >> To fully kit up a PC with proprietary >> to the same equivalent as what a major distro >> like Ubuntu offers, it would cost $1m or more > > Yet a raving clown like you won't even pay $10. > >> to have all the software, terabytes of source code, compilers, tools, >> applications and features that open source provides >> free. Around 25,000+ minimum ranging from 3D design, >> games engines, libre office to kicad, gcc, and vi. > > Most of it - or a close equivalent - is available for Windows. For free. > > Why don't you know that already, little fraud? > > There's some good OSS, but the best code, by far, is proprietary. > > best 3d game engines: proprietary > > best office software: proprietary > > best 3d graphic/modeling software: proprietary > > best rdbms: proprietary > > best music production: proprietary > > best accounting software: proprietary > > best statistical software: proprietary > > Yeah, but any of that morph into a golden solar eagle and fly to mars with the fat walrus at the controls? No.... You seem to forget the fat sardine catcher "thinks in hex and bits and bytes"...... -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
$1m propietary costs suck, Open source costs less 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2014-05-04 19:23 +0100
Re: $1m propietary costs suck, Open source costs less flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-04 14:49 -0400
Re: $1m propietary costs suck, Open source costs less Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-04 13:34 -0700
Re: $1m propietary costs suck, Open source costs less 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2014-05-05 02:55 +0100
Re: $1m propietary costs suck, Open source costs less DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-05 11:05 -0400
Re: $1m propietary costs suck, Open source costs less Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-05 17:41 +0200
Re: $1m propietary costs suck, Open source costs less Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-05 16:51 -0700
csiph-web