Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #242557

Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mit.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs
Date	Thu, 08 May 2014 16:10:54 +0200
Organization	gnu
Lines	51
Message-ID	<871tw47441.fsf@gmail.com> (permalink)
References	<lkbsp1$dvm$1@dont-email.me> <lkdem3$fho$1@dont-email.me> <ca866661-347d-477d-8505-6cb9820225d3@googlegroups.com> <lkdoav$rqe$1@dont-email.me> <d9pkm9l5l9kg6ccfstu8tph382jodgqhj4@4ax.com> <lkebre$ep7$1@dont-email.me> <lkebuk$aui$2@dont-email.me> <sbsmm9h0sc4nogt1op95051bu40scne35k@4ax.com> <lkfubf$6gd$1@dont-email.me> <14qc2p0xms0rc.fv7pbi7oe2oj.dlg@40tude.net> <lkfuvf$ash$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain
Injection-Info	mit.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d296e68b2904788dc608824cae64f2ba"; logging-data="10571"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/zJF66ovCxyPUtLRiBlWRV5Mv5kbLOAZM="
User-Agent	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
X-Face	2h#\|\|Cd#d%FNCm59[_6/{1a@jy%;\|j>{D~4^gKg(^i%7j0IK?+<E"~~VEHpAJ&'G+cu0g& $xE$h&Kjg@6-s8\aR,(o3Z]m)d.cAU-y!i/G'}}$WId)8Uh3TpmTQSRis6,U`NQ8IWIda}W:tIo=Bb 2M]M7$V[!_PMb9YnDD@W6z9TLk7/>,/GmW&:CD5fEKb_!
Cancel-Lock	sha1:42yVDgezWAm+HKB+sVkgGyeGBQ8= sha1:vl7w0yiiTIt4C+utukiyy+D06bU=
Xref	csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:242557

Show key headers only | View raw

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes:

> On 05/08/2014 08:47 AM,  flatfish+++ wrote:
>> On Thu, 08 May 2014 08:46:38 -0400, DFS wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/08/2014 08:00 AM, chrisv wrote:
>>>>> Dumfsck wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And kicked ass in every market except one dominated by in entrenched
>>>>>>> monopoly, massively aided by the momentum of huge "compatibility"
>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Say what, turd?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your fellow lying idiot RonG said "Vista requires all new equipment and
>>>>>> applications"
>>>>
>>>> Say what, dumfsck?  That's got nothing to do with what I wrote, you
>>>> shitwit.
>>>>
>>>> "Hadron" likes you.
>>>
>>>
>>> One cola moron (you) says Windows is 'masssively aided' by compatibility
>>> with the existing Windows ecosystem.
>>>
>>> A second drooling moron (RonG) says the latest Windows (at that time)
>>> had NO compatibility with the existing Windows ecosystem.
>>>
>>> Which drooling, ignorant asshole should I believe?  And why?
>>>
>>> Too much choice for me...
>>
>> And they wonder why the Linux community is the laughing stock of the
>> computing world.
>
> I wonder if there's a single Linux user in the world who doesn't whine and lie
> about Microsoft?  Doubtful.
>

Me? Actually most "real users" don't because invariably they use a
hybrid of technologies.

You must remember that clueless wankers like turdv and wRonG aren't
representative of real SW Engineers in any shape or form.

-- 
"I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." 
The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree.
PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Thread

Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-07 01:55 +0200
  Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-06 20:39 -0400
    Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 17:42 -0700
  Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-07 10:25 +0100
    Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-07 09:36 -0600
    Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 08:39 -0700
  Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-07 10:06 -0400
    Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 09:22 -0700
      Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-07 12:51 -0400
        Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-07 12:01 -0500
          Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 10:47 -0700
            Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 13:12 -0700
          Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-07 18:24 -0400
            Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-08 00:26 +0200
              Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-07 18:38 -0400
              Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 23:39 +0000
              Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-08 07:00 -0500
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-08 08:03 -0400
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-08 10:01 -0600
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-08 13:13 +0100
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-08 08:46 -0400
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-08 08:47 -0400
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-08 08:57 -0400
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 16:10 +0200
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-08 18:15 -0400
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 10:58 -0700
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-08 10:53 -0400
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 08:02 -0700
        Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 23:36 +0000
          Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-08 10:08 -0400
      Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 23:28 +0000
        Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 16:34 -0700
    Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-07 12:33 -0400
  Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 10:14 -0700

csiph-web