Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #242541

Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs

From	DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs
Date	2014-05-08 08:46 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<lkfubf$6gd$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <lkdoav$rqe$1@dont-email.me> <d9pkm9l5l9kg6ccfstu8tph382jodgqhj4@4ax.com> <lkebre$ep7$1@dont-email.me> <lkebuk$aui$2@dont-email.me> <sbsmm9h0sc4nogt1op95051bu40scne35k@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 05/08/2014 08:00 AM, chrisv wrote:
>> Dumfsck wrote:
>>>>
>>>> And kicked ass in every market except one dominated by in entrenched
>>>> monopoly, massively aided by the momentum of huge "compatibility"
>>>> issues.
>>>
>>> Say what, turd?
>>>
>>> Your fellow lying idiot RonG said "Vista requires all new equipment and
>>> applications"
>
> Say what, dumfsck?  That's got nothing to do with what I wrote, you
> shitwit.
>
> "Hadron" likes you.

One cola moron (you) says Windows is 'masssively aided' by compatibility 
with the existing Windows ecosystem.

A second drooling moron (RonG) says the latest Windows (at that time) 
had NO compatibility with the existing Windows ecosystem.

Which drooling, ignorant asshole should I believe?  And why?

Too much choice for me...

Thread

Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-07 01:55 +0200
  Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-06 20:39 -0400
    Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-06 17:42 -0700
  Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-07 10:25 +0100
    Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-07 09:36 -0600
    Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 08:39 -0700
  Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-07 10:06 -0400
    Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 09:22 -0700
      Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-07 12:51 -0400
        Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-07 12:01 -0500
          Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 10:47 -0700
            Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 13:12 -0700
          Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-07 18:24 -0400
            Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-08 00:26 +0200
              Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-07 18:38 -0400
              Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 23:39 +0000
              Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-08 07:00 -0500
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-08 08:03 -0400
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-08 10:01 -0600
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-08 13:13 +0100
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-08 08:46 -0400
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-08 08:47 -0400
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-08 08:57 -0400
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 16:10 +0200
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-08 18:15 -0400
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 10:58 -0700
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-08 10:53 -0400
                Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 08:02 -0700
        Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 23:36 +0000
          Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-08 10:08 -0400
      Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 23:28 +0000
        Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 16:34 -0700
    Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-07 12:33 -0400
  Re: Another area linux can't compete according to the dimbulbs Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 10:14 -0700

csiph-web